On the day in the August election campaign that Julia Gillard chose to announce the ``real Julia’’ would be on offer to voters, she also gave an insight into her political style, now being tested more than ever.

In the days when Gillard would be seen with a union. Picture: John Feder

It came during a conversation with SMH journalist David Marr and me on a bus ride out of Sydney, and the impetus was a joke by me which neither found funny.

I had suggested that an old anti-Vietnam war chant be adapted for Labor’s campaign: ``One is right, one is wrong, Victory to Penny Wong.’’

They couldn’t even manage polite smiles—and can’t be faulted for this—but on the positive side the failure led to a discussion of Gillard’s university days and her role as a left-wing student politician.

Essentially, she said she was a leftie because the left had the power and the numbers within the Adelaide University students’ union and the national body, the Australian Union of Students. To get things done, she went left.

She insisted that any review of her student record would show she used the factional power to look after bread and butter matters, such as student housing, campus services, and mainstream education in general.

She wasn’t always out marching for Palestinians or against uranium mining. She was an office radical, not a street fighter.

In 1983 she became vice-president of the AUS with responsibilities for education and moved to Melbourne University to complete her law degree. That same year she was elected president of the AUS.

By her own willing description, Gillard is a pragmatist, not an ideologue.

In her speech to Congress, the Prime Minister praised Ronald Reagan, the US President (1981-89) whose conservative takeover of US politics drove her left-wing colleagues to fury just when she hit the peak of student politics.

A familiar criticism of Gillard from the Coalition is that she stands for nothing. There is no Gillard vision of the world, no big-picture image of her ideal Australia, argue Liberals.

Liberals dismiss her as a ``negotiator’‘, as if this were alien to politics. But their point is that Gillard will fake anything to get her way.

She might not have a detailed political creed—apart from an emphasis on education—but the core of her approach is to get done the things that need to be done, and not be hobbled by external debates.

You have to be in government to accomplish good deeds and being pure on the sidelines is pointless.

So she accepts the protection of two of Australia’s most right-wing trade unions, and has given members of the left some of the biggest jobs the Government must complete.

Gillard is in office largely thanks to the AWU and the shoppies union, and has Greg Combet pushing climate change policy, Anthony Albanese managing tactics in the House, and Martin Ferguson negotiating with major miners.

That pragmatism is being focused on seeing through two major policy missions. One is to settle a tax on miners’ profits, and Treasurer Wayne Swan is close to putting together legislation for that, with the agreement of big mineral companies.

The other, of course, is the introduction of carbon pricing by July, 2012.

Wobbly Labor MPs and ministers are being reassured that the Prime Minister will dedicate herself to the carbon project, attending to both the attacks on her integrity and on the price flow-on of the scheme.

She will not be marketing it as a ``great moral challenge’’ as Kevin Rudd did. It will be a task to be completed on schedule for the economic, environmental and energy security benefit of the nation.

It’s not a crusade. It’s not personal. It’s business.

Plenty of Labor MPs will be watching her to measure whether she is up to the leadership test, and whether her political approach works or needs to be replaced.

106 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Erick says:

      04:59am | 11/03/11

      Turning Gillard’s opportunism and propensity for lying into a positive “pragmatism” - that’s a new one.

    • Reg says:

      06:03am | 11/03/11

      Gotta love it when people can laugh at themselves eh Erick?

      But Mal…

      “I had suggested that an old anti-Vietnam war chant be adapted for Labor’s campaign: ``One is right, one is wrong, Victory to Penny Wong.’’

      ... tell me you weren’t seriously expecting a laugh from that. That’s the sort of pointless rubbish I’ve come to expect of some of humourless right-wingers around here.  Woe the ides of March approacheth when the Sun crosseth the Equator. Keep you head down Tony.

      Gotta mention the laugh that an image of Tony doing the address to the US Congress engendered.  Lots of staring blankly and waiting and fumbling with notes.  Oh dear oh dear.

    • Adam Diver says:

      07:40am | 11/03/11

      Once again, Farr has mislead me with his title. The irony is the business approach to getting things done, is at the opposite spectrum of the current Labor government.

      If Labor was not so reactive to polls and advertising they would have an ETS, a mining tax, and a lot less lies to cover up and probably a different PM.

      “It’s not a crusade. It’s not personal. It’s business.” - Funny that business, relies so heavilyon idealogue, and so little on real world results. I wouldn’t be investing in shares with Ms Gillard as CEO.

    • Vaunted says:

      08:03am | 11/03/11

      @Reg, how on earth did you get from Malcolm’s considered observations, self evident to most Australians really, to having a crack at other Punchers and via the standard ALP group-thunk slurs at Tony Abbott; not even remotely the subject of the article and in fact one the of brightest and most broadly educated people in Parliament? It’s mindless sledging like yours that drags down the level of discussion, turning a well thought out article into a witless, boring, partisan slugfest that does you and the side you evidently support no credit whatsoever.

    • Steve of Cornubia says:

      09:35am | 11/03/11

      I’m sure he didn’t mean to, but Malcolm has described our Labor government perfectly - headed by a PM who will do anything to secure power, while the two most pressing matters of business are both implementing big new taxes…...

      Yup, that’s Labor.

    • acotrel says:

      10:51am | 11/03/11

      @Erick
      Tony Abbott has fabricated figures about the price on carbon without having reliable information. Doesn’t that constitute telling lies? He seems to make a habit of manipulating the truth!

    • Neil Campbell says:

      01:05pm | 11/03/11

      Mr. Farr - Gillard’s pragmatic, business like approach to the carbon tax will see her lose office. Not personal, not for idealogical reasons - seems a bit stupid to throw your job away just for ‘business’. Maybe it is the ‘elites’ pulling the strings.

    • Reg says:

      03:05pm | 11/03/11

      Vaunted; “self evident to most Australians really.”

      Exactly, there is nothing new in there that hasn’t already been processed and spat out in the last several days and if you think there is, then you also have been skimming. All the other responses are only another opportunity to repeat themselves.

      Stop skimming.

    • LeftRightOut says:

      06:50am | 12/03/11

      OMG, could Farr possibly be a more blatant sycophant?

      I think I threw up in my mouth reading that. Shame on you, Farr. It’s very clear [by what you write] that you’re a card carrying member of the ALP, but this one goes way too far, Farr.

    • Sarah Bath says:

      05:16am | 11/03/11

      You are so wrong.  Gillard as well as the other neocons, are the most right wing bunch.  We need to have serious change to go forward.  The Social Alliance is the best option for this government but unfortunately we live in a democracy and they will never get enough votes.  The next best thing is the Greens.
      Until the US alliance is remove , animal farming banned and veganism is encouraged and the defence force is absolved then there is no hope for the future.

      We need more importantly to legalise Gay marriage and teach gay appreciation in the schools to remove any homophobia. 

      Her sucking up to the US was disgusting. Get rid of the defence, get rid of the aliance.  Advance Australia

    • acotrel says:

      06:13am | 11/03/11

      @Sarah.  There is a movie titled ‘A town like alice’ with Virginia Mckenna.  It’s about a group of mothers who walked through Malaya during WW2 carrying their kids. There was one Japanese guard, and they werre sent from camp to camp, dying along the way!  Without the Yanks, that’s where we in Australia would have been after the Japanese conquered us!  The reality is that sort of thing could still happen even in this era.  Defence is expensive, but also important for our wellbeing. That movie was on TV again recently, and I still feel the anxiety it caused when I first saw it!  HIstory began for me during the 40s, NOT 1980!

    • dovif says:

      06:43am | 11/03/11

      and lets ban the Jews and Asians from Australia like the red neck Greens member in Marrickville wants

    • Reg says:

      07:03am | 11/03/11

      Sarah Bath; “Until the US alliance is remove , animal farming banned and veganism is encouraged and the defence force is absolved then there is no hope for the future.”

      Please Sarah, have the courage of your convictions to say that veganism should be ENFORCED. I mean, if you insist that animal farming be banned, what other option is there?

    • Ironside says:

      07:10am | 11/03/11

      @Sarah, your post is an example of why the Greens and the Socialist alliance are so dangerous.
      Absolve the Defence force (i assume you mean dissolve) is a stupid idea for more reasons than i care to mention.
      Ban animal farming and veganism encouraged? I assume you mean veganism enforced because with no animals we cant really do anything else. So you are presumably advocating not only for forced social engineering of what people eat but the wholesale slaughter of billions of animals in order to save the environment?
      Teach gay appreciation in schools? More social engineering. I don’t have any problem with homosexuals having the same rights as straight people, but that doesn’t mean i have to appreciate their lifestyle and it certainly doesn’t mean that it is right to force appreciation down children’s throats. How about you advocate the balanced provision of information about a subject and then teach critical reasoning and logic at schools, and you know what kids may then appreciate your lifestyle without having it forced on them.
      Sarah you and people like Nora are so ignorant of the way the world actually works rather than the way you wish it to work that its scary. I suggest you leave the inner city for a while, travel a bit and speak to some real people who work for a living and you will find that not a lot of people share your views.

    • Reg says:

      07:15am | 11/03/11

      Dovif; ” Asians from Australia like the red neck Greens member in Marrickville wants” 

      Huh? Something fishy there mate. How did he get elected in Marrickville on such a platform? Perhaps he WASN"T elected and you’re just creating mischief?

    • TimB says:

      07:22am | 11/03/11

      See guys, troll. Exact same crap “Nora” was on about.

    • Reg says:

      07:47am | 11/03/11

      Holy Sh*t Timmy, I bet you were a school-yard bully as well. “Gather around chaps and let’s kick some sense into Nora.” 

      If you’ve got nothing worthwhile to contribute Timmy, then pi*s off.

    • persephone says:

      07:50am | 11/03/11

      Sarah

      So we leave ourselves effectively defenceless, when we have a country with one of the largest populations in the world on our border - and have to ramp up defence spending by a couple of billion as well.

      We ban animal farming, thus ensuring the extinction of several animal species, and turning most of our farming land into monocultures (far more diversity of species in your average grazing paddock than there is in a wheatfield), and increasing health costs.

      (Vegetarianism only works as a health benefit in Western societies, where it is voluntary, and part of a wider series of life choices; in countries such as India, vegetarianism had led to increased rates of heart disease, for example).

      Without a defence force, we would be invaded. I can’t think of a sinlge country of those likely to invade us who would tolerate gay marriage.

    • dovif says:

      08:03am | 11/03/11

      Reg

      You do know the Green candidate in Marrickville wants to ban Israel food and Chinese good from Marrickville.

      If the One Nation candidate or Pauline Hanson wants to do the same thing, I would wonder about the reaction

    • Ben says:

      08:06am | 11/03/11

      @Sarah…..Cuckoo,cuckoo

    • TimB says:

      08:24am | 11/03/11

      You first Reg. I’ll measure the worthiness of my contributions against yours any day of the week.

      Given your propensity for posting indecipherable nonsense and random insults at others, I doubt it would work out well for you.

    • Elphaba says:

      08:32am | 11/03/11

      You really, really, are letting the side down.  Perfectly sane vegetarians and vegans have to put up with this militant crap from you lot.  Just eat your tofu and put a lid on it.

    • skepdad says:

      08:46am | 11/03/11

      Reality check Sarah: All of Australia above the Tropic of Capricorn is marked “Southern Irian Jaya” in Indonesian school textbooks.

      “Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay; and claims a halo for his dishonesty.” - Robert Heinlein

    • AdamC says:

      09:09am | 11/03/11

      Sarah, Julia Gillard is not a neo-con. I didn’t bother to real the rest of your trollsome comment - why read people whose elementary errors show they have no idea what they are talking about? 

      Is there some sort of spam comment bot created by GetUp! and the Greens to make nonsensical comments on blogs under names like Sarah and Nora?

    • Hamish says:

      09:53am | 11/03/11

      AdamC, I think she’s taking the piss isn’t she? Like that Composta lady…? No one is that much of a caricature surely? WTF is gay appreciation? Is that like art appreciation? And if there’s no defence, how are they going to enforce conformity in the socialist utopia?

    • Octavius says:

      11:59am | 11/03/11

      *yawn

    • malohi says:

      02:45pm | 11/03/11

      Even if Sarah is trollin’,
      Ironside just dealt a tremendous b-slap to the face.
      Well said chap.

    • Andy says:

      06:15pm | 11/03/11

      I agree with something Persephone said, quick someone shoot me!!

      ...oh, and Sarah, there is a reason people don’t vote for Socialist Alliance, and it’s the same reason they don’t vote for One Nation.

    • james milton says:

      07:26pm | 11/03/11

      @Sarah “unfortunately we live in a democracy”

      Wow, just…wow. Are all greenies as thick as you?

    • LeftRightOut says:

      12:08pm | 12/03/11

      c’mon people, Sarah Bath is taking the pi$$. Not a Composta type (too obvious for that) but sucked a few of you in none the less.

    • LC says:

      07:38pm | 20/07/11

      “unfortunately we live in a democracy”

      You know what the best thing about living in a democracy is?

      If you don’t like it, you have the freedom to LEAVE.

      (Although if you end up living in a place like, say, North Korea or China, you may not have that freedom if you find it’s not for you. smile )

    • John C says:

      05:23am | 11/03/11

      I do not know whether Malcolm intended this piece to be favorable to GIllard or not, but what I gather from it is that she presents as a person without any firmly held principles and whi is only concerned with power.

      If this is the case, it is not good. W e need leaders with principle. Right or wrong, past leaders like Whitlam, Hawke, KEating, Howard had beliefs that they stood or fell by. Rude came a gutser when the people concluded that he was a man if straw.

    • Adam Diver says:

      07:46am | 11/03/11

      I agree with you, but I also agree with this sentiment

      “You have to be in government to accomplish good deeds and being pure on the sidelines is pointless.”

      However, the issue I have with Labor, is not (so much) what they did to get in power, but what they have achieved whilst there, and what they are doing to remain in power.

      I don’t want an ETS or a mining tax, but a competant goverment with strong beliefs should have this locked in well before the last election, I have to assume, that Labors priorities is not its policy but its power.

    • acotrel says:

      12:21pm | 11/03/11

      @ Adam Diver
      ‘However, the issue I have with Labor, is not (so much) what they did to get in power, but what they have achieved whilst there, and what they are doing to remain in power. ‘

      Let’s talk about what Labor did to get into power?  They negotiated with the independents - something beyond Tony Abbott’s capability! They remain in power because their ideas are PROGRESSIVE!

    • dovif says:

      02:53pm | 11/03/11

      acrotel

      and they adoopted policies of the Greens when she promise she would not do and has now spend billiions on Winsor and Oakshoot’s seat

      Week politics at its best

    • Against the Man says:

      05:32am | 11/03/11

      The fact we have a ‘real’ and ‘fake’ Juliar should have been a clue that we were getting a whole bag of trouble with this very fake PM. C’mon ALP zombies prove me wrong and show me ALL her successful policies. HaHa good luck…......

    • Reg says:

      06:11am | 11/03/11

      Do you mean the ones that gained the support of the Greens and the Independents? Now don’t tell me you believe that the majority of politicians DON"T erect a facade of honesty and trustworthiness. Even you and JWH do THAT ATM. 

      * Upper case stresses are to assist TimB and Erick with their dyslexia. wink

    • acotrel says:

      06:15am | 11/03/11

      @ATM Show me ANY of Abbott’s policies!

    • Joan says:

      07:00am | 11/03/11

      There ain’t no real Julia only aJuliar the liar who is having trouble keeping track of lies as she fakes it through every day. Latest fake is the all choked up delivery of ` I believed Americans could do anything`  in Congress ... no one choked up about the man on the moon back in 1969 ...they marveled in joyous wonderment . The truth back in late`60`s   USA was pretty much on the nose…. with more people protesting against Australia`s involvement in Viet than sobbing about ` American can do anything`.  Leftie Gillard all choked up, fawning to USA was just another fake on the make.

    • Flexo says:

      07:08am | 11/03/11

      It is amazing how people will response by deflecting and distracting by bringing up an exPM aka John Howard or the Coalition’s Abbott. If memory serve me well, Julia Gillard is the PM, shouldn’t the focus be on her? When you avoid the questions and use the childish responses of what are the Coalition doing about it, it clearly shows that the ALP supporters are indirectly admitting their PM and ALP are useless beyond all hope.

    • Barry says:

      07:15am | 11/03/11

      Ahhhh Tony Abbott isn’t the PM at the moment . . . . the onus is more on Julia Gillard to actually be doing something, which was the original question; we are looking for successful policies.  If you can’t come up with any(I’m looking at you acotrel), don’t bother commenting because you’re just making yourself look desperate and clutching at straws.  Tony did this, and Howard did this are not valid arguments.

    • John A Neve says:

      07:15am | 11/03/11

      A the M,
      Not you again! All those buzz words of yours “real”, “fake’ and “ALP zombies” it just becomes a drone in the background.

      Come on wise one, give us of your “wisdom”.

    • Adam Diver says:

      07:52am | 11/03/11

      The lack of answers is perhaps the most telling of all.

      Julia Gillards successful policies:

      Myschool - Matter of opinion if your a fan, but it is a successful policy carried out well.

      This might be an indictment of my ideological bias, but I am seriously stuck for another broadly successful policy by Julia Gillard.

      I open the forum, for people to expose my bias, by providing other examples of Gillards successes.

      I will even generously give half marks for the BER.

    • Joan says:

      08:02am | 11/03/11

      Adam Diver .... My School…. a list of real facts ( I hope.)... not a policy.

    • Steve Smith says:

      08:09am | 11/03/11

      Against the Man
      Obviously by your coments, you have became a brainwashed clone of the Liberal party led by Tony Abbott.
      How Sad….............

    • Steve Smith says:

      08:29am | 11/03/11

      Joan
      Does “Don’t believe everything I say” and ” the statements that need to be taken absolutely as the gospel truth are those carefully prepared scripted remarks”
      The winner of the “Biggest Liar” show is Tony Abbott,who is falsely proclaiming how much a carbon price or (tax) as he likes to call it will cost everyone and add cost to every day things that people buy.
      The only problem is Joan, no price has been put on the proposed carbon price(tax) so how can Tony Abbott make claims to costs rising on everyday products should such a carbon price or (tax) be introduced.
      Tony Abbott has been caught out for his misleading lies, scaremongering and scare campaign that he has orchestrated against a Carbon Price (tax) that doesn’t even exist as yet.

    • TimB says:

      09:01am | 11/03/11

      Steve, if you don’t know how much it is, then how do you know Tony is lying? He could be dead on the money, you don’t have a clue.

      And FYI his costs are based on the figures Kevin Rudd floated for his ETS. You want to prove that Tony is “lying”? Get your beloved Queen Liar Julia to release the figures.

    • MarK says:

      09:09am | 11/03/11

      No Steve Abbott has taken the last known position of $per ton on carbon to use as his basis for comparison. Since the government has no detail it is left up to others to fill in the blanks.

      If you were fair similar criticism could be made of the government claims about compensation. If there is no plan how can they say people will be better off under it? Why are some of the government ministers saying all revenue will get returned as compensations when that is not the enunciated preface to the workprint of the guide to a draft to a working paper to a plan (perhaps) that we have now?

      Are they deliberately lying or id the government so confused and was so blindsided by Gillard that they know nothing about it themselves.

      Seems awfully like a Rudd off the rials scheme does it not soldier?

    • Steve Smith says:

      09:18am | 11/03/11

      Tim B
      No Tim, get Tony Abbott to back up his figures of what the costs might be with real facts.
      Truth is that Tony Abbott can’t back up anything that comes out of his mouth.

    • TimB says:

      09:43am | 11/03/11

      Steve, he backed them up with facts supplied by *Kevin Rudd*.

      Are you capable of understanding the significance of this?

      If you want him to use different figures *Julia* has to supply them. It isn’t Tony’s fault that she won’t. How about you take off your ALP blinkers and assign blame where it belongs?

    • acotrel says:

      10:42am | 11/03/11

      @TimB
      ‘You want to prove that Tony is “lying”? Get your beloved Queen Liar Julia to release the figures. ‘

      So you’re telling us that fabricating figures in the absence of reliable information, is not telling LIES?  Beauty is in the eye of the beholder?

    • Steve Smith says:

      11:52am | 11/03/11

      Tim B
      The fact that Tony Abbott is even claiming what the costs will be for a carbon price (tax), amounts to the fact that Tony Abbott lying and making false statements which he cannot substantiate or back up.
      What may have been Kevin Rudd’s price on carbon (tax) may not be the current Prime Minister Julia Gillards.
      Until Tony Abbott has accurate figures and proof to back up what he is saying, then his words are meaningless and empty .

    • TimB says:

      12:30pm | 11/03/11

      Steve, no they’re not.

      Labor wants to put a price on Carbon. The last time they wanted to do that the price was $26 per ton.

      Labor wants to put a price on carbon now. They wont release a price. Tony is forced to use the only one available.

      If Julia want’s to debate the price, she needs to release it. It’s all on her.

      Don’t let your hatred of Tony Abbott get in the way of facts.

    • John A Neve says:

      01:02pm | 11/03/11

      TimB,
      You are correct, however, you have fallen into the same trap. TB is baseing
      his opinion on old data, as such it has no validity does it?
      TB, like most of our pollies is in it for the money and the glory, TB in power would do next to nothing for the bulk of Australians.

    • acotrel says:

      04:43pm | 11/03/11

      @TimB Even if Tony is ‘dead on the money’ with his figure on the price of carbon, he’s simply fluked it!  He’s made definite statements where no official information has been released.  He is clearly an unmitigated LIAR.  For him and others on this forum, to claim Julia tells lies, is a travesty.

    • Tator says:

      07:54pm | 11/03/11

      Steve,
      “Because the $26 a tonne price of carbon was the price used by Treasury to model the impacts of a carbon price on the economy. Now, that was the figure the Treasury used. I think it’s perfectly reasonable for us to use that figure in estimating the impact of the carbon tax but I do make this point, this carbon tax is coming because the Prime Minister told lies to the public before the election and it’s coming because the Prime Minister is being dictated to by the Greens. So, it’s highly likely that the carbon price will be much, much higher under this carbon tax than it was under the original proposal.”
      From a door stop interview with Abbott and Hockey 1/3/11
      ( http://www.liberal.org.au/Latest-News/2011/03/01/Joint-Doorstop-Interview.aspx )

    • Bris Jack says:

      07:42am | 12/03/11

      Flexo,  when the likes of acotrel type in A and T on their computer it is programmed to attack Tony Abbott and the Libs.
      L makes it a bit more involved for them.

    • acotrel says:

      05:36am | 11/03/11

      PLEASE!  PLEASE!  For God’s sake give the Liberal party back their birthright, and let them rule the country.  Give the crown to Abbott!  This poisonous crap is becoming all too much!

    • Vaunted says:

      08:51am | 11/03/11

      Acotrel old son, your chip is showing, or maybe you’ve inadvertently picked up your old 2003 ALP standard slurs and retorts manual. Fact is, this is Australia and nothing to do with birthright. Average punters like me go head down bum up for most of our lives and don’t generally give a toss who’s in charge, as long as we believe they’re both forthright and competent. I came out of a dark cupboard around the time Kevin Rudd revealed his genuine snake oil propensities around the time of the 2020 Summit for Truly Smug and Gushing Luvvies, later watched him fall with some relief and even began to have some hope for Julia, right up to the point she emerged on the balcony with a triumphant Bob and Christine, a bitter old Windsor and the grotesquely grinning Oakeshott in tow. It’s about wanting decent, competent leadership, that’s all. Forget the spin, hidden agendas, filibustered responses to fair questions and transparent half truths. Most of us simply want leaders we feel we can believe, trust and respect, that’s all.

    • jb says:

      05:42am | 11/03/11

      Gillard the mugger as you clearly stated Malcolm should be eduction minister at best, I mean getting all teary when she talked about being a little girl watching the Americans walk on the moon.
      Wow so that is what makes her believe they are the most can do nation on the earth.
      Perhaps she should look at the achievments of our nationals and what we have done for science in the past.
      Could that moon landing money been spent in a way to better the citizens of the USA instead of the space olympics with Russia?
      You bet ya otherwise we would all have been hoping on that train to the man in the moon…

    • Charles says:

      06:36am | 11/03/11

      It seems Malcolm has found another ‘Julia’, although whether this one turns out to be a more dominant one than some of the others is questionable.

      I believe Julia Gillard is more of a populist than perhaps even Kevin Rudd.  The only objective is power, anything else is miles behind this, and there is nothing she will not compromise to achieve/retain it.

      Her big problem now though is going to be the Greens, particularly after her fawning sycophantic effort in the US the other day.  I actually rather like and admire the US, but even I felt uncomfortable to the level she went to suck up to them.  Polite behaviour would indicate keeping some semblance of distance between us and them.

      This would have however infuriated the Greens and they will respond by demanding even more from Julia Gillard, and she will be forced to give into them as she still has her main objective of power driving her.  Therefore, I think Australia could be in for a rough ride until we manage to get rid of the ALP/Greens government, as there is no such thing as integrity and honour among this bunch of thieves

    • Joel B1 says:

      07:44am | 11/03/11

      Indeed, what with at least some more knowledgeable analysts explicitly stating that we need to walk a very fine line between the ascendant PRC and the USA.

      You can clearly see this if you look at many of the comments by Americans regarding the PRC in their main media outlets. “Nuke them back to the stone-age” being fairly typical.

      The USA is not keen on the PRC but the PRC and India that are soon to be the main world players. Gillards naive “forging closer bonds” with the USA will come back to haunt us (not her but as she’ll be long gone).

    • George says:

      06:45am | 11/03/11

      Malcolm Farr and Mike Riley - ALP rah rah squad!  I wonder if ‘Jools’ promised these two a safe ALP seat in the next Federal election like Paul Howes is shamelessly auditioning for one!

    • Steve Smith says:

      08:16am | 11/03/11

      George
      It is Mark Riley, not Mike has you have written!
      Mark Riley is a hero, he stopped Abbott in his tracks, speechless and completely lost for words.
      Abbott would never make a good Leader or Prime Minister, but he would sure make a good side-show alley clown,and he has the right head movements,side to side, up and down.
      What a classic village idiot Abbott is, i would never get bored with watching re-runs of the interview that he had with Mark Riley

    • Dingo says:

      11:29am | 11/03/11

      Steve Smith, it is really offensive that you condone Mark Riley’s use of the death of an Australian solider for a cheap “gotcha” attempt on Tony Abbott. No matter what you think of Abbott it was gutter journalism at its worst.

    • Rabbott says:

      11:46am | 11/03/11

      No Dingo it was a very revealing insight into the man who would be king.
      How he reacted when shit happened tells us he is unstable.

    • Sludger says:

      01:41pm | 11/03/11

      George, Mark Riley operated in the lowest possible way. He was simply a piece of pond slime given the chance to strut his poisonous propoganda to an unwitting (so he thought) audience.  If you actually followed the feedback from that you would know people saw him for the vitrolic nastiness he was.

    • Reg says:

      06:15am | 13/03/11

      Sludge; ”  If you actually followed the feedback from that you would know people saw him for the vitrolic nastiness he was.”

      Sludge you’re only another victim of faux-liberal misinformation machine.

      A slimy attempt to make Tony Abbott’s miserable failure look respectable. All Tony did was fail to use his authority as an elected representative in support of our troops. Why wouldn’t he and his sauny supporters struggle and squirm in the glare of such a miserable performance?

      Traditional faux-liberal redirection of their failures onto the weaker. Don’t be another of their victims Sludge.

    • dovif says:

      06:49am | 11/03/11

      For me, I want a leader with a vision for Australia, a person who have believes and give us something to aspire to. Keating was the last ALP leader, who had a vision for Australia and was willing to do things he thinks was right and not what the Opinion polls tells him. He made Australia a better place

      Howard was also the same, he risked losing elections to get his GST up, make changes to the mining and waterfront sector, and workplace reform. Like him or loath him, He made Australia a better place

      Rudd and Gillard seems to only want to make popular decision, they only makes decision, when they are forced to by the greens, or if the opinion polls tells them. They do not seem to have any vision for Australia

    • persephone says:

      07:55am | 11/03/11

      Keating was a realist, just as Gillard is.

      Er….Gillard just made a decision she knew was going to lead to a hit in the polls, so I can’t see how you can say she only wants to make popular decisions.

      And this decision, to act on climate change, like her commitment to the NBN, is all about a vision for the future.

    • Dash says:

      07:56am | 11/03/11

      dovif, this is well said! I agree. This government is not a Hawke/Keating styled ALP. It is the most socialist government in our History.

      Yes, Keating can take credit for a number of excellent policies including the implementation of the financial deregulation recommendations under the Campbell report and the implementation of compulsory superannuation which pumped trillions into our economy.

      Howard was a man of principle and more of a statesman than the whole ALP front bench combined. He left this country a better place with full employment levels, envious GDP growth levels, Zero public debt, restoration of the country’s AAA rating and tax cuts over 5 consecutive years. He staked his political future on the GST which was the most significant tax reform since 1936 and lost on the basis of his fight with the costly inefficiency of the IR laws and the union movement.

      This current pack of fools have taken us backwards. Three new taxes, living costs up and set to rise, interest rates and inflation on the rise, rorting and waste of taxpayers money, the biggest defecit in our history and the biggest socialist agenda in our history! Gillard has taken the ALP backwards. 35% support when Rudd got the chop, now down to just 30%! And they’re looking to railroad a policy through parliament on the back of a deceitful lie. They are hiding behind the environment to tax us and redistribute the nations wealth to whoever they see fit!

      We need the statesman like Howard and Keating back! And we need to get rid of this pack of wasteful, incompetent, socialist morons!

    • TimB says:

      08:19am | 11/03/11

      “Er….Gillard just made a decision she knew was going to lead to a hit in the polls”

      I’m not so sure she did know that. Remember “I believe Australians want a price on carbon”?

      Or was that a lie too? Does she not really believe that?

    • MarK says:

      08:41am | 11/03/11

      “Er….Gillard just made a decision she knew was going to lead to a hit in the polls”

      Hang on she was all Neil Mitchell telling him how popular this would be.

      Which is it?

      Brave decision? Necessary reform? No pain tax? The Bill Gates lets all be billionaires together reform? Save the planet.

      What? Pick a goddam position. I am getting dizzy.

      You make stuff up so often it scares me. Spin baby spin. No wonder you forgive her the lies. Seems a valid tactic from your perspective….lying.

    • Kevin says:

      09:21am | 11/03/11

      If the Libs hadn’t elected a deranged fool as their leader, they may well have been in power now.  Unfortunately, our choice of PM is limited to the resultant winners of the internal power struggles within the two major parties.

    • persephone says:

      12:44pm | 11/03/11

      TimB

      certainly I expected Labor would take a hit in the polls over this. Almost every major government announcement which will lead to big change does.

      I think Gillard is more intelligent than I am, so I would expect she also is able to see the bleeding obvious when it’s coming down the track with its lights on and the horns blaring.

      The fact she did so many media interviews on the issue also strongly suggests she saw it coming (you don’t need to sell something which you know will be greeted with popular acclaim).

      MarK

      transcript of interview:

      http://www.pm.gov.au/press-office/transcript-interview-neil-mitchell-3aw

      She says that she believes people will come round to accepting it in time.

      Necessary decisions can also be brave decisions.

      I can’t follow the rest of your post, as you descend into gibberish. Whatever it is you’re on, can I suggest you give it up?

      I love it when you resort to saying I’m lying, especially when you don’t back it up with any sort of proof.

      I’ve seen the same reaction from kids in the playground.

    • MarK says:

      01:29pm | 11/03/11

      I know pers.

      Every time I hear you refer to kids I shudder that you teach.

      If you cannot follow my post go get some lessons. You lie. I catch you out all the time like that claim we emit the most CO2 per head of population that Labor pollies repeat.

      It is not the truth. It is not spin. It is a lie designed to support a failing policy position.

      There is the latest proof.

      I wish I was on something I really do. I long to be on something. It is a need and a intense desire. I do fight it every day though. So far so good but who knows in the future I might do a Fev.

    • persephone says:

      02:00pm | 11/03/11

      MarK

      I apologise sincerely for the flippancy of that remark.

      I had truly forgotten your personal situation, and assure you that I would never (intentionally!) make fun of that.

      I undertand (well, I don’t, no one does who hasn’t been there, but I try) what a struggle it is for you and am feeling a bit sick with myself for (inadvertently, I stress) making what looked like a snide remark about it.

      Again, apologies.

    • MarK says:

      03:33pm | 11/03/11

      I didn’t take it personally don’t worry.

      And I honestly don’t mind if people make fun of it. It really doesn’t bother me at all. I deserve to be mocked and laughed at. And I mean that sincerely.

      Please do not feel bad. I put that there not for that reason but more to be topical and “understanding” of what Fevola must be going through.

      It was not meant as a dig at you. I know you would not do that intentionally or unintentionally as the case may be. Normal argy bargy.

      No harm and no foul in my books. I apologise for making it look that way which on reflection it does. My bad.

      Forget it and don’t stress. Seriously - no problem at all.

    • fairsfair says:

      03:58pm | 11/03/11

      @MarK, @Perse - now you two have gone and made me all misty eyed.

    • CJ Morgan says:

      07:21am | 11/03/11

      Interesting that The Punch doesn’t even try to present anything like a balanced view on Australian politics.  From where many of us “lefties” sit, Gillard and her government are so far to the right that they would be indistinguishable from the Coalition if it wasn’t for the latter’s boofheaded negativity.

      At least Labor is taking baby steps in the direction of sustainability, with the assistance of the Greens.  Mind you, shame about the Tarkine and the pulp mill.

    • Adam Diver says:

      07:56am | 11/03/11

      So this article is right-bias? I could of sworn it was another fluff piece for the left.

      Differences of opinions and all that I guess.

    • MarK says:

      07:23am | 11/03/11

      So you are are now writing an apologist piece to explain the dichotomy in her kissing the collective US sphincter using the words of an Irish rocker and her “real” politics.

      She went left to get things done? She is prepared to do anything in other words. Like lie.

      Seriously weird article article. You pop in the mining tax as though all is well. You tell us how politicos is about negotiation, separate from capitulation I guess, and this is a plus.

      All you seem to do is reinforce the image of someone with no inner belief. No guts. No position she wants to fight for. A person happy to go with the flow and win the odd minor skirmish on the side and claim success.

      In other words you describe a person not suited to be a PM. What happened since yesterday? You get a phone call? You get a case of the guilts and realised that jumping off the ship would do nothing to promote your warmist cause?

      Please try and get better. This article smells like weak justification and the beginning of the desperate save Julia campaign that will be started as soon as she hits the airport in Canberra.

      Kevin says hi from Tunisia by the way. Can’t wait for more developments on our foreign policy pronouncements. Must arrange popcorn for this one. How positively quaint the PM and FM can’t get their ducks in a row.

      I suppose that is just pragmatism form her eh? Letting herself be railroaded ......again.

    • Bono says:

      12:59pm | 11/03/11

      Actually what I said was.
      “When I was a boy, my first impression of America was a man walking on the moon. I thought these Americans are mad but I thought what this country can do if they put their mind to it. It’s incredible. John F. Kennedy was the one who said in 1963:
      ‘By the end of the decade we’re going to put a man on the moon.’
      It’s what we’re asking now, from President Bush, Prime Minister Blair and the other entire world leaders to do. What we’re asking them to do is something extraordinary. Not to put a man on the moon, more like put mankind back on Earth. We have the technology, we have the resources, and we have the know-how to end the extreme poverty. If we have the will and I believe we have the will. We had the Civil Rights Movement, others ended Apartheid, and others tore back the iron-card. That’s what’s up to us, our moon-shot, our putting the man on the moon; we’re going to end extreme poverty. We’re going to make poverty history. That’s what’s up to us to do. I believe that’s not an impossible adventure. I believe in fifty years they’ll look back on this moment and they’ll say:
      ‘There were some people at a time who said: Its not ok for a child dying in the 21st century for the lack of a 20-cent immunization, its not ok for a child dying for the lack of food in its belly in the 21st century, its not ok anymore”
      ......We’re not looking for your money, we’re looking for your voice.”
      -Bono, Vertigo Tour, Live at Chicago.

    • Justin says:

      07:45am | 11/03/11

      So Gillard is pretty much the same as Rudd then? She doesn’t have the genuine factional power base & could just as easily be swept aside.

      One thing is clear, the ALP certainly isn’t the cradle of democracy.

    • Joel B1 says:

      08:12am | 11/03/11

      It’s true that recently the ALP has been a bit autocratic, Kitchen cabinet of four etc.

      But contrasted with the Greens the ALP are poster boys and girls for democracy. Bob Brown will stand for no discussion that doesn’t follow the prescribed doctrine. Green ex-members say that if you have an alternate view you are bullied into quitting. Brown even said about the deputy leadership challenge “We didn’t tell you [journalists] because you didn’t ask”.

      That’s Green democracy for you.

      PS I reckon Bob hates the Exclusive Brethren so much because they are actually so alike in many ways. Kind of like that kid who wore the same clothes as you, spoke like you, got the same marks as you and generally annoyed the crap out of you at High School?

    • danny says:

      08:13am | 11/03/11

      Can anyone tell me just who, when and why did persons unknown have Julias past removed from all records?
      She was in a communist movement with the unions years back and protested against the US and Ron Reagan.She now has the hide to pretend to the US congress that she loves America -when in fact she dispises them.

      This woman is a quisling and dangerous to boot.
      Oh and dont get me started on that embarassing imbecile Garnaut.

    • DAsh says:

      08:38am | 11/03/11

      Yep! How many members of congress knew Gillard was a member of the Socialist Forum until 2002? She only left when it became a political liability for her! And she now leads the most socialist government in our history. She is a liar and a hypocrite!

    • John A Neve says:

      02:48pm | 11/03/11

      DAsh,

      This government is many things, but it certainly isn’t “the most socialist government in our history”/

      If you really believe that? Perhaps you’d like to explain why you so think?

    • Earth says:

      08:19am | 11/03/11

      It’s not me but myself. It’s not me but I.

    • Anna C says:

      08:44am | 11/03/11

      Why do people like Julia Gillard bother getting involved in politics if they obviously don’t have a vision for Australia?  It seems to me she is only interested in in power for power’s sake as is the Labor Party in general.  If I was in her position I couldn’t wait to put my vision into practise but she is so wishy washy about everything; I suppose it isn’t helped that she has the Greens to contend with. But what a wasted opportunity?  Why can’t we have some leaders with vision in this country?

    • Reg Whiteman says:

      09:31am | 11/03/11

      Anna, we do have a leader with vision and his name is Dr Bob Brown.

      Dr Bob’s vision is of a great new Australia where everyone gets around on bicycles, dog-carts or in horse-drawn wagons; where every industry is silent and rusting; where we all pedal our own dynamos to generate sustainable energy; where every coal mine is closed and flooded; every farm devoid of domestic animals and left to be reclaimed by the bush and no-one is allowed to chop down a tree. It will be cold in winter but we’ll soon get used to gathering roots and berries and weaving our own clothes out of hemp.

      I can’t wait!

      But best of all, men will be allowed to marry men, and women marry women. The school curriculum will be changed so that homosexuality will be seen in its well deserved positive light. Little boys will be shown how best to stick their penises up other boys arses and homophobia will disappear from the land.

      There will be no immigration department and any raving Islamic lunatic who can cross the sea will be welcome. No doubt they’ll soon acclimatise in a non-threatening, gender inclusive, multicultural way.

      Now that’s a vision for you. A nation of starving, vegan peasants sodomising each other.

      A you think we don’t have a leader with vision!

    • Vaunted says:

      09:45am | 11/03/11

      The overwhelming majority of Labor (and Green?) parliamentarians are professional politicians Anna, drawn directly from the union movement, the party machinery and/or the public sector, with very little experience of the real world the rest of us inhabit. They are programmed to climb over corpses, to use scripted speeches and professionally concocted guile to win at any cost. There’s no doubt in my mind that the ALP’s current sad decline has snowballed since the professional apparatchiks began precluding well-qualified community members from preselection, and worse, openly insulting their loyal constituents by parachuting relatives, union bosses and incompetent cult personalities into safe seats.

    • scarlet says:

      09:09am | 11/03/11

      I really think she is process-oriented, rather than results oriented. She loves ‘‘debate’’ (if you can term what occurs in parliament that) and she loves negotiating, making sleazy deals and being seen to be in the middle of it all.  What she lacks is clear vision for the future.

    • the pieman says:

      03:35pm | 12/03/11

      @ scarlet; now lets cut the bullshit; Juliar is a marxist thru and thru, we can only watch her chameleon act in The US with disbelief.
      Dont for a moment believe that she is out to help aussies at all! she is the destroyer who will enslave us with debt and taxes that my grandkids will never be able to pay off; in so doing destroy the middle class of this once great egalitarian society that we all so loved.
      Cant you see the divisiveness of her ways.
      Illegals out of control( nothing can be said because of the racism gag)
      People openly stating that they will act against Aus.
      Debt growing daily to in the vicinity of 190 000 million dollars.
      A PM that openly lies then tells another lie to pretend that she never lied
      (if we accept this we accept anything from the bottom of the garbage tip of life)
      Cover ups of racial unrest again by creepy racial laws.
      Our Churches being attacted by forces inside the coutry
      Taxes that are crippling families struggling to survive this nightmare.
      Electricity costs deliberatley driven up by these so called faceless men.

      Come on just what game do you think these toerags are playing, its certainly not deck coits.

      We all need to stand up and speak the truth in the teeth of all these lies.
      There can be no more pissing around the edges - you cant nice your way out of this fraud.

      She is the lady with the mission; of this I have no doubt.
      Are these people so stupid to make all these crackpot decisions; or are they deliberatly crafted to drag us all down?
      i believe the latter
      that is her Agenda

    • Democrat says:

      09:20am | 11/03/11

      Spot on Malcolm.  To get anything done you have to be in Office. It is all very well to be dogmatically to the left or the right but unless you have the ability to make decisions and give effect to them all the ideology in the world won’t matter a jot.  As Gough once famously said when attacking the Victorian Left who openly stated that they preferred to be in Opposition then sacrifice their principles - “certainly the impotent are pure”.  For any Liberal to attacking Gillard as somebody who stands for nothing is hypocritical to say the least.  Abbott has had more positions on climate change than there are positions in the Kama Sutra.  This also the ‘there were will be no new taxes by the Liberal Party under my leadership’ followed shortly after by the policy of a 1.55 levy to fund paid parental leave.  it is also the man who promised the Medicare Safety Net for the 2004 election then promptly once the election was held increased the thresholds for accessing it.  Abbott is a hollow man.  Gillard is getting things done - the conservatives hate it and the violence of their rhetoric displays their fears.

    • David LD says:

      10:42am | 11/03/11

      Yeah, she’s so economically left-wing.

      Since gaining office she has totally outlawed private companies and has brought everything under control of the state.

      She’s also a completely socially leftist (small-l libertarian) too.

      She’s legalised marijuana, gay marriage and voluntary euthanasia.

      Her doing all of those things so clearly undermines everything good and pure about Australia.

      Yep, what a total left-wing nutjob Julia is.

    • Squeeze the Middle says:

      11:01am | 11/03/11

      “It will be a task to be completed on schedule for the economic, environmental and energy security benefit of the nation” Fantastic.  But who pays?  That’s the question that’s holding up progress isn’t Malcolm? 

      Labor has held up completing the task because of the potilical bent it wants to put on the solution. Isn’t it Malcolm?  Drop the holier than thou stage show. It will be a task to be completed on schedule for the economic, environmental and energy security benefit of the LABOR PARTY.

    • Cate P says:

      01:14pm | 11/03/11

      A strange piece, this, but it explains a lot about the policy confusion and dysfunction in this govt. Weakness at the top. If you don’t have a strong and coherent political philosophy, you don’t have a coherent idea or vision of what the country needs or how to achieve it, so you can’t articulate it and you just swing in the breeze, buffeted about by those with stronger ideological convictions (in this case the Greens).

    • Squeeze the Middle says:

      02:06pm | 11/03/11

      “It’s not a crusade. It’s not personal. It’s business.”

      Here’s some crude calcs for you all to think about while you’re trying to work out what the nysterious business of Carbon Tax is:

      Electricity sold in ACT in 04-05 was 2717GWh and 58% was purchased by government and business.  Bear in mind that most business in the ACT services government and its employees. There’s almost zero industry that services others. ACT population was around 330K.  Hence the homes, amenities, offices and businesses servicing the delivery of government activity eminating from the ACT is roughly 8.23 MWh per person pa. Assume 10% of ACT workers live in NSW - 58% of 10% brings the number down to around 8 MWh .

      The whole nation consumed about 190,000 GWh in 04-05. Population was about 20.3M. This gives a per head consumption of 9.36 MWh per year.

      So in 04-05 the whole of Australia only consumed 17% per head more electricity than the ACTerritorians despite carrying substantially the full burden of industry.

      This is an indicative figure to point to the high likelihood that government activity in this country is the LEAST CO2 efficient activity of all. Which is probably why the numbers have been kept soooooo quiet.

      Australia is a high per capita emitter BECAUSE of our governments, NOT in spite of them.  They want us to change our behaviour but they won’t change theirs.

      Please prove that I’m wrong.

      Sources:
      http://www.environmentcommissioner.act.gov.au/publications/soe/2007actreport/indicators/energy07
      http://www.indexmundi.com/australia/electricity_consumption.html

    • Rick says:

      02:29pm | 11/03/11

      Julia Gillard: A practically left-wing PM in every way.

      Stalin too was one and I’m sure that Julia has learnt a lot from the way he has obtained absolute power by deceiving his own people ( their comrades).

    • Steve Smith says:

      05:03am | 14/03/11

      Rick
      If you want to compare Julia Gillard with Stalin, then perhaps Tony Abbott could be compared with Hitler.
      Hitler was a right wing fanatic, and Tony Abbott is from the right wing also.
      Tony Abbott was part of the former Liberal Government that brought in Workchoices And Anti-terrorism laws that were akin to laws in Hitler’s ‘Enabling Act’ of March 23d, 1933.

    • St. Michael says:

      09:25pm | 11/03/11

      The article’s point is misaimed.  In politics a pragmatist is interested only in power.  And all politicians, especially now, are pragmatists first and foremost.

      Gillard has a lot in common with Obama.  Both of them are arrivistes to their factional philosophies, and very recent arrivistes at that.  Obama’s no Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton.  He’s not even American-born.  Obama was Barry for most of his life until getting up in Chicago’s dirty but influential political games—the equivalent of modern New South Wales—turned him into Barack.  He’s thrown a lot of former patrons and supporters under the bus not when he knew their extremist politics, but when their public comments threatened his tilt at power.

      There was a saying in college football in the US when they first put blacks on the teams, with all of the racial prejudice against them.  Of one coach who was thought to be a racist and yet had a number of blacks on his team, it was said “Likes winning more than he dislikes blacks.”

      Gillard’s no different, it seems, based on this article.

      But *all* politicians are like that bar the really nutty ones with even nuttier electorates.  Does anyone really think John Howard liked the religious principles of the Exclusive Brethren as a sect so much that he passionately fought for their exemptions from workplace laws under the Workplace Relations Act? Nope; he wanted their influence, and that was their price of getting it.

      And don’t get me started on Tony Abbott, whom apparently gets a from God in that if he behaves like a Christian for one day of the week it allows him to worship power at any price for the other six.

      The attempt at making Gillard, or any politician, look redeemable on the hollow justification “s/he gets stuff done” is worthy only of sniggers, and only shows how far our democracy has sunk.

      An ideological politician—of Left or Right—I can respect if not agree with because they at least hold to some principles openly, and one might presume they’ve actually given some deep thought to their position.  If they hold to those convictions when in power the presumption can be made they think those convictions are the right way to run the country.

      A man or woman in power who has no identifiable convictions cannot be trusted, because the presumption is that he or she has put their own advancement ahead of the country’s interests.  Pragmatism is nothing more than the love of power for its own sake.

    • the pieman says:

      09:54am | 13/03/11

      @ at michael, agree with a lot of what you say.
      Sounds to me as if you study US politics- it a pity more dont down here dont.
      If they did they may come to the conclusion that we are being taken over by intentionally created debt.
      We see what happens in the US is always repeated out here- the good and bad.
      Its a terrible shame both our liiberty loving counties have been thrown under bazzas and Joo-liar marxist wheels.
      I mean- even if we ever manage to get rid of them we will be eternally saddled with the horrendous debt that has been deliberatley built by them.
      They are the destroyers of the middle class.
      And yes Julia is a liar we will never forget- she will go down as that in all records.
      Bazza the wrecker of the US; what can be said- the man is an out of control embarresing trainwreck.He is daily doing more damage to the US than any invading armie could ever dream of.

    • Peter says:

      07:58am | 12/03/11

      Thats a lot of words strung together to point Juliar is a liar and has no concience about being liar so long as her lies get what she wants.

    • gra gra says:

      09:11am | 12/03/11

      Big day! Abbott’s addressing the U.S. Congress. “Sorry”, he says,“I forgot my script. I’ll have to tell lies”.  Bloke on stage says, “You can’t tell lies here. Who do you think you are?”. Abbott glares, can’t get the words out, he’s so enraged. Then he realises that he’s not in front of his Liberal lollypops, so, no harm done, he belts the guy. Wham! (He’s an Oxford blue in boxing, so he can do that to a 78 year-old Congressman from Oklahoma). Then he strolls around the stage, hands clasped above his head, just not understanding why the crowd are booing. “I won, didn’t I?”, he asks. No, Mr Abbott, you didn’t win. Bullies and hypocrites never win.

    • JPM says:

      02:02pm | 13/03/11

      Left/Right-wing as we know it and commonly use, is fictional dichotomy; it does not actually exist. Any attempt to objectively define the values underpinning the so-called ‘left wing’ or ‘right wing’ automatically exposes the paradoxical & subjective nature of these terms.

      How does the seating arrangements of the 18th century French parliament have any relevance to the 27th Prime Minister of Australia?

      If by left-wing, you mean Julia Gillard is a revolutionary, who does not support the status quo/current regime, then perhaps your use of the words might have meaning. But she is not a revolutionary and thus she is not left-wing.

      If you insist upon using this false dichotomy, then the only reasonable characterisation of Gillard is right-wing; because she, like the French royalists, supports the current system. She is in fact, a very conservative politician when you look at the important questions such as the allocation of resources, control over the means of production, the supply of currency.

      What I really mean to say by ‘conservative’, is that is she is no different from her previous half dozen predecessors. Of course the great illusion of democracy (the ‘trick’ that makes it work) is to make the masses think that a change in leadership actually equates to a change in policy and/or a change in wielding of power. It does not.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@AndrewCatsaras Agreed. Kills more people than AIDS. Yet tolerated. Meanwhile: Good Insiders piece again Andrew.

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @JamieTravers: I'm in Europe and don't care for Eurovision, why is my twitter feed filled with Aussies recounting the bloody thing!?

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter