So, British tourist hot-spot Alton Towers has put the kybosh on budgie-smugglers. Well done the Poms, I say.

Apparently there's something wrong with Speedos. Photo: Angelo Soulas

The reason behind the ban on Speedo’s and ‘other tight swimwear’, the fun park says, is to ‘prevent embarrassment among fellow members of the public and to maintain the family friendly atmosphere of the resort’.

This being so, I can’t think of a more apt time to call on the Rudd government to roll-out a similar kind of initiative.

The tighty-trunks have always proved controversial: a popular fashion statement from those who are unnecessarily proud of their physique.

The whole idea of wearing such a skimpy bather comes across as an attempt by men to show off their manhood. But the whole project falls flat, with that thin piece of unforgiving fabric usually exposing their lackthereof. Not to mention that most of them are so ill fitting, and far too tight. Does the expression ‘hungry-bum syndrome’ resonate with anyone?

Australia already has a cringe-worthy public track record with the ‘barely there’ cossie’s. Remember NSW pollie Peter Debnam in those budgie smugglers during the 2007 state elections? No doubt you do, as it was, much like a childhood trauma, seared into all our memories.

Then there was Bodgie Bob at the 1975 ALP conference, all proudly oiled up in his extraordinarily tight baby briefs. And of course who can forget that other visually searing moment, when Hawkie showed off his Prime Ministerial tan and not much else when he mingled with the crowd at a charity cricket match in Canberra.

(On a separate note, someone needs to send a desperate message to all male Aussie pollies that it’s never ok to bring the boys out to the beach.)

The poster-boy of the budgie smuggler debate is none other than ‘that old guy’ we’ve all seen wandering aimlessly around the beach. You know who I mean. The sixty-something leathery-skinned aging ex-surfer dude, who patrols along the sand, without ever taking a dip, standing at the edge of the surf with hands on hips, gazing out into the sun, smugly confident that all eyes are fixed on him.

Perhaps a ban on all beaches may be a tad neurotic, but not so on venues known for their family friendly atmosphere. Like for example Neilson Park at Vaucluse Point, where the sight of paunchy geriatrics with mounds of sun fried flesh wobbling over fluorescent G-strings is out painfully out of place amongst the bucket and spade brigade.

Of course, the most popular excuse thrown around by wearers is one of comfort.

Now, I know no-one likes to be told what to wear by the fashion police, but I really, really like relaxing in my trackie-dacks. Heck, I’d wear them all the time if I could. But hey, I don’t think it’s fair of me to treat the rest of the world to such an unflattering sight.

We should all be grateful to the good sense of the citizens of Alton Towers - at least someone finally has the fashion sense to know when enough is enough.

30 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • HarlequinBeetle says:

      05:50am | 17/08/09

      Brave Natasha…and Daring.  Applause.

    • Peter says:

      07:19am | 17/08/09

      Mind you, in France, as the recent “burquini” controversy showed, apparently budgie smugglers are compulsory: no shorts or swimmers with too much cloth at your local pool.  It’s those excess bacteria you see.

    • Eric says:

      07:22am | 17/08/09

      While we’re at it, can we ban revealing swimwear for ugly women? Supermodels only, please.

    • Peter Thornton says:

      07:38am | 17/08/09

      Whether it’s, ‘the sixty-something leathery-skinned aging ex-surfer dude, who patrols along the sand, without ever taking a dip, standing at the edge of the surf with hands on hips, gazing out into the sun, smugly confident that all eyes are fixed on him’. Or the ‘paunchy geriatrics with mounds of sun fried flesh wobbling over fluorescent G-strings’, it’s always the same story: Speedos are the Devil’s own work.

      Last Saturday I sat in the (unused due to the time of year; I am not a lifeguard. I could cop the uniform) council lifeguard shed at Long Reef beach reading the paper and occasionally looking at the waves and the people on the beach. One sight I found especially irritating was that of a middle-aged man running around the beach with his young children. Nothing terribly wrong with that, however he was sporting Speedos. His exuberance coupled with the facts a) he was wearing Speedos & b) he had a fairly good build only made it more of a spectacle than anything else. It is a strangely mislead mind that convinces itself that Speedo actually look good.

      Rant over!

    • David says:

      08:41am | 17/08/09

      This is a joke…  So if you want to get rid of budgie smugglers you then don’t mind all women not wearing bikinis of any type?  This is a poorly put together argument, I would of expected you to at least address the obvious what the other 50 % of the population wheres to the beach…

    • eag says:

      09:09am | 17/08/09

      Oh Dear, live and let live hey? So judgemental!

    • W says:

      09:18am | 17/08/09

      I refuse to be oppressed!! My body is my own and it shall not be censored!  Too long has our society demeaned men due to perceived inequalities in their natural form but not longer.  We will stand tall saying we are proud of our lumpy, hairy physiques and society must accept us for what we are!

    • RT says:

      09:32am | 17/08/09

      The new prudery. Soon we will be back to being allowed to swim only after dark in neck to knee costumes like it was 100 years ago. How are you any different to the prudes of those days, Natasha? Pretending it’s humour doesn’t disguise it.

    • Jake Zanoni says:

      09:50am | 17/08/09

      Aside from the fact that the Commonwealth Government does not have jurisdiction (Federalism Natasha, learn it, love it), I’d prefer to live in a free land, even if some budgies are smuggled in the process.

      You have managed to make Tory Maguire’s recent efforts on The Punch look downright freedom loving by comparison though, so I guess that is some sort of achievement.

      I propose a ban on bans.

    • charles says:

      10:18am | 17/08/09

      Natasha - you say ban the BS, but don’t mention male G-strings.  Do you think those are OK?  I hope not:)

    • barry says:

      10:43am | 17/08/09

      I also support this endeavour. Compulsory burkinis for men!

    • Rob says:

      10:46am | 17/08/09

      Ban speedos, and ban females wearing anything that is more revealing than this:
      http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/projects/petzko/gallery/bathing_suit_ad.jpg

      Or (preferably) just shut up.

      Love it how there’s no mention of banning g strings or skimpy bikinis, and you’ve only mentioned male politicians - I doubt you’d give a sh!t if you saw someone like Sports Minister Kate Ellis in a skimpy bikini at the beach.

      You might be offended by seeing the outline of a fellas sausage & meatballs through his speedos, but I don’t see how it’s any more offensive than seeing the fat rolls & muffin tops of the average australian shiela hanging out for all to see, or sagging breasts, stretch marks and nipples visible through swimsuits that are usually 2 sizes too small.

    • EvaDiva says:

      10:55am | 17/08/09

      Come on guys…..
      How do you think it is like for us girls at the beach seeing a saggy, wrinkly, gravity deprived bodies with balls covered by a piece of material???
      There is the saying, if you got it, flaunt it, but ahem sorry to disappoint you the budgie smugglers are a bit out of date…. maybe your mums liked it but we don’t.

    • Hayley says:

      11:07am | 17/08/09

      Let’s be honest, none of us have a problem with speedo’s when it’s hot, attractive, built young men wearing them =)
      Not guys like I imagine Rob on this blog, would look like.

    • KT says:

      11:21am | 17/08/09

      Seconded.

      As for this being some kind of male-specific oppression, let it be known that I am all for oppressing women should their swimwear allow the casual onlooker an uninterupted outline of her genitalia. Mystery is king (and queen).

    • Rob says:

      11:25am | 17/08/09

      That’s just stupid, whos to judge whats hot and what’s not, where are you going to draw the line and how the heck are you going to enforce it?

      You either totally ban revealing outfits on men AND women, or you, preferably, don’t ban anything at all.

      If this was about banning fat old women wearing g bangers and too small a boob tube you’d all be crying out with your feminist equality rants.

      Hayley:

      Let’s be honest, none of us have a problem with bikinis & g strings when it’s hot attractive, busty young women wearing them =)
      Not girls like I imagine Hayley on this blog, would look like
      (like you can imagine what someone looks like from their comments on the internet!)

      EvaDiva:

      Come on girls…
      How do you think it is like for us guys at the beach seeing saggy, wrinkly, gravity deprived bodies covered by a piece of material???

    • barry saunders says:

      11:29am | 17/08/09

      i’m amused by how many people fail to get the joke. She’s not proposing confiscating your meathangers by force, people.

    • Eric says:

      12:03pm | 17/08/09

      Barry, after 40 years of male-bashing articles in the media, I do not see the “joke” anymore.

    • James says:

      12:48pm | 17/08/09

      So, this has gone from a tongue in cheek article about how some people might want to think about their appearance a little when out on the beach, to a big argument about freedoms, rights and oppression.

      It might be the ‘Australian’ thing for men to go to the beach in their budgie smugglers, but isn’t it also the ‘Australian’ thing to poke a little fun at everything?

      If we can’t handle a bit of bashing being targeted at our swimwear, then I propose we make the move to swimwear more like this: http://i27.tinypic.com/2im9vyb.jpg

    • stephen says:

      12:53pm | 17/08/09

      Outta the water it shrivels up like a bloody peanut anyway.
      (The Poms should be talking about their cricket)

    • Jake Zanoni says:

      12:59pm | 17/08/09

      No Barry, I get that it is all ‘tongue in cheek’ and ‘super clever’, I just think that it isn’t witty and speaks to a terrible evil in our society; the propensity of people to initiate force to achieve their particular political or societal goals.

    • Domenic says:

      02:22pm | 17/08/09

      Unfortunately it’s a part of the pool/beach scene in summer. why dont we just ban fat people from these places as well because there are many things that hurt my eyes when summer comes round!

    • hayley says:

      03:36pm | 17/08/09

      hmmm have hit a nerve I think, lol
      I’m pretty happy with my looks thanks Rob, and you’re right, don’t usually imagine what people on blogs look like,
      - But there was something about your o.t.t comment that had me picturing an insecure ugly dude, taking his frustrations out on the opposite sex… Just an assumption, right or wrong, i dont know =)
      Anyway, bring on summer!!! The good looking scenery & people in most parts of sydney often cancel out the bad!

    • Patrick says:

      04:01pm | 17/08/09

      Hayley, there is something about you’re comments that have me picturing some fat, pimply, skanky, ugly, smelly and insecure girl/woman taking her frustrations out on people on the internet who she doesn’t know and does not have to confront face to face.  Just an assumption, right or wrong, I don’t know =)

    • hayley says:

      04:36pm | 17/08/09

      Yes, well you’re entitled to your assumption Patrick, just as I am.
      None of the above is true though I’m afraid, and I am more than happy to confront people face to face when such comments as Rob’s arise =) 
      Assuming it is a Patrick, and not in fact Rob himself above?

    • Kim says:

      05:50pm | 17/08/09

      Bravo Natasha.

    • peter Thornton says:

      05:52pm | 17/08/09

      Fact is, women are the beautiful gender so as far as I am concerned women can wear anything (or nothing - preferably) they like.

      anyone man who does not agree should simply shut up.

    • Rob says:

      06:35am | 18/08/09

      Hayley, so you’re happy to confront people face to face to call them insecure and ugly because they’ve made a facetious comment?

      Do you not understand that, or do “Sausage and meatballs” + “rolls and muffin tops” make there way into your average discussion?  you realise that usually it’s the beautiful people that are the most arrogant? (well that’s my excuse and I’m sticking to it) haha and no, I’m not Patrick and wouldn’t stoop to your level of judging looks by text.

    • Steve B says:

      06:17pm | 18/08/09

      EvaDiva says:
      Come on guys…..
      How do you think it is like for us girls at the beach seeing a saggy, wrinkly, gravity deprived bodies with balls covered by a piece of material???

      I would suggest it’s about as appealing as the saggy, wrinkly, gravity affected camel toe that get squeezed into some 64 year old nanna’s 2 size too small one piece. Doesn’t mean we should be telling her she’s banned from wearing it though does it?

    • Mark says:

      07:02pm | 11/08/10

      Natasha Lee, where are you from, Alabama or Kansas?  Obviously you are an American spy from the US swimwear industry which is desperately trying to wipe out low cost, long lasting Speedos with overpriced swim “shorts” (which have begun to appear more like “pants” already in the US, where obesity even among children is epidemic).  Aussie guys are way more in shape than Yanks and should wear the Speedos.  Screw the Yanks and stop letting Hollywood and the big American corporations tell you what to wear and what wars to fight.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@AndrewCatsaras Agreed. Kills more people than AIDS. Yet tolerated. Meanwhile: Good Insiders piece again Andrew.

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @JamieTravers: I'm in Europe and don't care for Eurovision, why is my twitter feed filled with Aussies recounting the bloody thing!?

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter