Who on earth wants to yell at their television?

On the case!

Voice activated smart TVs have been a staple of the emerging technologies I’ve seen at CES in Las Vegas this year and I must say – I just don’t get it.

So far I haven’t seen a voice activated smart TV that works as well as it’s supposed to, but even if I had - if I never have to talk to my television, I’ll be better for it.

You’ve got voice integrated remote controls that let you speak into it. Which is just like, why? Why create a voice activated remote control? Why not just create a voice activated TV? Voice activated controls for gaming have been impressive mainly, but I just don’t get why anyone would want to buy a tv or gaming console you have to talk to.

Instead of designing voice controlled televisions here are my suggestions for technology we need.

One remote to rule them all

Creating a voice controlled television is kind of like curing cancer before the common cold. All I want to do is have one remote that controls everything. One remote. That’s all. One remote to rule them all – the TV, the DVD, the Blu-Ray, cable, digital hard drives etc. Is that so much to ask for? I’d sooner buy a tv that tells me where I put the sodding remote than one I have to boss around.

A proper hands free “Siri” alternative

So Apple was the first to release a voice activated function for the smartphone that works in a way that is useful and effective (for the most part). Google “Majel” isn’t far behind.  But here’s the thing – Siri is great and all, but it’s a little counter-intuitive because to use it you still have to rifle around for your phone, press and hold the button and then prompt it to execute your command.

I want to do on my phone what I can already do on some smart TVs and gaming consoles.  I want to boss it around without ever having to touch it. Wouldn’t it be great (and safe) to be able to be driving your car, and say “Smartphone, call work, tell them I’m going to be late” – without ever having to touch it? Or ask your phone for directions so you don’t need to spend time at a traffic light punching in the coordinates.

See, CES – I’ve just found you a new marketing demographic. Drivers. Also – parents with small children. Kids require constant attention so it’s probably not a good idea to try to cradle a child on the one arm and text with the other.

Enter voice control.

Forget voice controlled televisions – give me a Siri alternative that works.

But if you must – Bluetooth headsets 

If you’re going to create televisions you can yell at – at least make them practical.

Develop a Bluetooth headset so you can interact with your television or gaming consoles from anywhere in the house. Xbox Kinect already launched voice activated controls that were rolled out with the latest update of Xbox live.

Wouldn’t it be great if while you’re cooking dinner for your friends, you can set up a movie for them to watch while you run around trying to make sure everyone’s comfortable?  How impressive would that be? You’d be a prince amongst men around your friends.

Just a little wanky earpiece with a microphone that lets you control the content on your tv from anywhere in the house. Simple. Inexpensive. Practical.

This to me is a far better reason to have voice integrated controls on televisions and gaming consoles like Xbox and Playstations.

Voice activated search shouldn’t be about sitting in front of your television giving commands. It should be about making the way you interact with your entertainment unit easier and more efficient. If you absolutely must develop voice controls – create solutions that help maximize people’s time so they don’t have to stop and stand in front of the thing and boss it around.

Practicality is key.

Most commented

57 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • PG says:

      09:25am | 13/01/12

      “All I want to do is have one remote that controls everything. One remote. That’s all. One remote to rule them all”

      They already make them, which work for any device which uses infra red with its remote. Have a look at the Logitech Harmony remotes as an example.

    • papachango says:

      10:43am | 13/01/12

      I believe this is what they call ‘first world problems’...lol

      but yea, +1 for Logitech Harmony. A little fiddly to set up, but once done it rocks! I’ve gopt six remotes that just sit in a jar, never used, unless the Logitech runs out of batteries, and even then it’s to transfer batteries from the original remotes to the Logitech.

    • TheRealDave says:

      11:23am | 13/01/12

      Not hat hard to setup. It involves looking at the back of your device and writing down the model number and brand….so you can look it up inthe logitech software.

      I just hooked up an old Barbie TV/DVD player my dughter got handed down to her from a friend and despite not having any ‘brand’ manufacturer on it I was able to trace it back, via Google and looking at pictures, to a generic chniese brand that was listed in the software and apply it to the remote inside of 5 minutes.

      Its a piece of piss.

    • neo says:

      01:05pm | 13/01/12

      I got my Bravia and my PS3, control both with the Bravia remote wink

    • PsychoHyena says:

      02:16pm | 13/01/12

      Universal remotes are great and all, on one condition, your appliance is supported by the remote. I’ve bought 4 Universal remotes and not one of them worked with my NeonIQ tv.

    • papachango says:

      04:19pm | 13/01/12

      @RealDave - true, but in mine you can set up ‘activities’ - which is a little fiddlier but well worth it.

      e.g. i set up one activitiy called “Watch TV’, and with one button press it turns on the PVR, the TV and the amplifier, switches the amplifier input source to video 2, the TV input source to HDMI. It also then also knows to use the volume buttons to control the amp not the TV, and the channel selector buttons to the PVR, not the TV.

      It took about 10 mins to set up, but each time I go to watch TV, this would have taken me 30 secs and three remotes to do previously.

    • papachango says:

      04:31pm | 13/01/12

      @PsychoHyena - even if your deivce isn’t on the universal remote’s database, unless it uses somethign other than infra-red, you can generally ‘teach’ the universal remote to operate it, but pointing the original remote at it and getting it to ‘learn’ the signals.

    • TheRealDave says:

      10:26am | 14/01/12

      @Papa - yep, my Logitechs are the same. You have a ‘Devices’ button to control the individual devices and ‘Activities’ button to setup your macros to turn various devices on/off, set the right input mode etc. Thats the beauty of it, you can set it up to be as simple or as complex as you like.

    • jim says:

      12:43pm | 14/01/12

      Thats not hard, I use a Keyboard, mouse and a real Operating System.

    • Jade says:

      09:49am | 13/01/12

      If they work as well as Siri currently does they can keep their voice controlled TV and I will stick to using the remote! smile

    • Realife says:

      09:57am | 13/01/12

      Oh dear. How do you ever make it through the day?

    • TheRealDave says:

      10:23am | 13/01/12

      I have a Logitech Harmony Remote. It controls my TV, Bluray, Windows 7 Medica Centre PC plugged into my Plasma, Airconditioner in that room and my Old DVD player I no longer use. I have another Logitech Harmony down the other end of the house for the LCD TV there, DVD player, SD Digital TV box and air con. And they weren’t ‘new’ technology when I got them 2 YEARS AGO either…

      This is what happens when you have a Journalist with a background in politics etc doing ‘technical’ articles. Probably why so many people are woefully ignorant about the NBN and technology in general. Maybe you should employ people with technology backgrounds to write your technology articles?? And by ‘technology background’ I don’t mean some knob who has an iPhone/iPad and can download an app athat makes fart noises….....

    • Kika says:

      10:30am | 13/01/12

      Really? Is it important? My Nintendo DS doesn’t recognise when I say ‘6’...I’ll stick to the old remotes.

    • HighlyDubious says:

      10:41am | 13/01/12

      It’s called a universal remote, and they’ve been around for years.. lol.

    • Paul says:

      11:02am | 13/01/12

      As an employee of a global electronics company that is showcasing these features at CES, I really think you should learn about the tech before you comment.

      Absolutely everything you have mentioned about in this article is incorrect. In fact, your recommendations are already a reality in this years range.

      All andoid phones have had voice communcations for years. You can already control your TV from any room in the house with your smart phone, and premium cars have had voice comms in them since the early 2000’s.

      Get a clue.

    • Robert S McCormick says:

      01:12pm | 13/01/12

      Paul,
      What happens if, say, you have a Stroke (yes youngsters are having them too), and are left with a severe speech impediment? Will this mean your TV etc. will have tobe re-programmed to accept your new sounds?
      Ok whilst we still can get the old-tech Remote there is no problem but, eventually, they will probably disappear & we will all be using this new technology for in a few year (month?, weeks?) new TVs etc will not be supplied with a remote & there will be no provision made for them.
      I like the idea of walking into my lounge & simply saying something which switches the TV on ‘cos even god sometimes must wonder where I put the remote after a few nice reds!

    • TheRealDave says:

      02:36pm | 13/01/12

      @Rob, yes, if you suffer a severe speech impairment then you would have to ‘re-train’ your voice commands. Same for most Voice activated systems/software.

      As for no remotes with the TV - easily done. Each brand/model has a set of infra red commands built into the remote and a receiver to accept those commands in the tv/device. They are predetermined and hardlocked. With the Logitech Harmony system they have all those codes from the manufacturers. You simply install the software on your PC, plug your remote in and add all your devices - via brand name/ model number drop down lists, and the software then puts the infra red commands directly into your ‘Universal Remote’.

      So future ‘devices’ could easily come with no remotes and you could just ‘download the codes you need’ direct to your existing universal remote/ voice activation system with a few clicks…..or voice activation commands if we go down that path wink

      Baddabing badda boom your done!

      You can ‘fine tune’ your and play aroudn with it. ANd yes you can add devices that are not currently supported by doing it the manual way ie pointing your current reote at the universal remote and ‘programming it’ like you do with non-smart universal remotes.

      I DO NOT sell or work for Logitech, but I am a huge fan of their products. I have a G35 headset (awesome), an original G11 Keyboard, G5 mouse and a 5.1 Surround Setup. I’m thinking about getitng a G13 as well…still not sure if I NEED it rather than just WANT it….the only non-Logitech peripheral I have is my Saitek X52…sorry, the Logitechs just aren’t as good as that bad boy wink

    • Justin says:

      11:05am | 13/01/12

      It’s pretty obvious why. Every new technology has to start somewhere. Voice recognition has been around for some time, but it’s still immature technology compared to where everyone wants it to be some day. This is why a female should not be commenting on technology in general.

    • Seth Brundle says:

      11:14am | 13/01/12

      “Voice activated search shouldn’t be about sitting in front of your television giving commands. It should be about making the way you interact with your entertainment unit easier and more efficient.”

      I dont get your point.  Voice Activation is all about making device interation easier and more efficient.  What do you want, a TV that can read your mind so you dont even need to speak to it ?  How much easier and more conveniant can it get beyond voice recognition?

    • Aaron says:

      11:56pm | 13/01/12

      I’m going to use Siri as an example here:

      Voice activated TV:
      *Press button to activate Siri*
      Siri, Change to channel 9
      *Beep beep*
      Changing to channel 5
      NO! Channel 9!

      Traditional remote,
      *Click* .... You’re done.

      I do see the advantage in the area of recording shows, setting reminders and things like “Play the next episode of Stargate for me” and it picks up from your library, but I doubt we’ll see that kind of integration, at least not on the level I’d require.

    • Baz says:

      11:30am | 13/01/12

      I don’t get voice activated TV, I just don’t see how it is more efficient then a remote and to anyone else sitting around it would just be annoying. The only thing that would make it more efficient is being able to bring up a channel by name, but other than that the remote is fine.

    • Miles says:

      12:42pm | 13/01/12

      I agree.  Using voice control for the TV would be ridiculous and annoying.  Are people really going to speak out each channel constantly when surfing?  It’s much easier to just press a single button.

    • Shane says:

      11:46am | 13/01/12

      Call me crazy but wouldn’t you want to cure cancer before the common cold??

    • maybe says:

      02:25pm | 13/01/12

      that one left me a bit puzzled also…

    • papachango says:

      04:25pm | 13/01/12

      I think she was trying to say, start out with the basics before getting to the fancy stuff. But since curing the cold isn’t the logical first step to curing cancer, it’s a crap simile.

      ‘Learn to crawl before you try to walk’ would have been better…

    • mmg says:

      11:56am | 13/01/12

      Voice controlled TVs are ridiculous and gimmicky.  Why replace something that works absolutely fine?  I think I will stick to a remote for my viewing as it is simple and it works.  Voice activation would work fine for things like “lights on” but for a detailed task like turning on a tv and media player and selecting the media to play and then playing it as well as adjusting the volume and possibly skipping to a particular point can all be achieved faster with your thumb than by any voice control.

    • Vivian says:

      11:57am | 13/01/12

      A number of things

      http://www.logitech.com/en-au/remotes/universal-remotes been out for years. Get one. They work.

      “Who on earth wants to yell at their television?” That is pretty obvious. People that watch Q&A specifically, Sky political reporting and the ABC in general that have an open mind tend to yell at the screen a lot. When you get another muslim regurgitating Twitter truisms the only sane response is to yell. Why does Q&A think to be representative it needs to represent Islam disproportionately?

      “Voice activated controls for gaming have been impressible mainly…” What does this mean. Impressible? What context are you using this in? It makes no sense.

      “Wouldn’t it be great if while you’re cooking dinner for your friends, you can set up a movie for them to watch while you run around trying to make sure everyone’s comfortable?  How impressive would that be? You’d be a prince amongst men around your friends.”

      Ummm what do you mean? Like using any number of wireless devices to stream movies from your PC to your TV? Or taking the 10 seconds to plug in a USB drive direct to your TV then press play? Or putting a DVD? Or accessing the hard drive of your DVD player or pay TV box for something you taped?

      I really don’t get this at all.

      How much more practical can you get than what is available now. I download a movie now, takes 15 minutes on average for the file to download, and I am on a normal copper 8mb/sec plan. I then copy that file onto a USB stick. Takes 10 seconds. I then place the USB stick into the side of my TV. A menu comes up pretty much instantly. I select the file using my universal remote. I press play. From searching for the movie I want to watching on TV total time 20 minutes. Actual manpower say 5 minutes which includes the umming and ahhing at what to download to watch. The rest of the time I can do whatever I want.

      5 minutes of actual time spent including time including decision making in front of the PC. And this is not practical already? Your cooking and hosting duties must take on the seriousness of a night incursion operation against a dug in and pre-warned enemy. You seem to treat a social experience as one to be scared of rather than savoured. How the hell can you possibly enjoy yourself if you are this stressed, uptight and worried already?

      Truly bizarre post howling at a problem that is solved by some basic knowledge.

    • DT says:

      12:32pm | 13/01/12

      Vivan - geez bud; get a life. You really spent a long time nitpicking everything and writing it all down.

    • TheRealDave says:

      02:46pm | 13/01/12

      Viv, quick tip, get a Win7 Media box and plug it into your TV via HDMIO if you’ve got the ports. Don’t worry about a huge fast HD in it either or buckets loads of ram or high end processors. Just and entry level dual core PC with an HDMI output and a Wireless N USB or card, up to you.

      That way you can stream all your media from your main box/storage directly to the TV (if you have a WAP, if not you need to go wired)  without the need for copying DivX’s and stuff around, finding USB thumb drives (mine seem to go throught he wash a lot) etc. The Harmony Remote works fine with WinXP/Vista/7 MC and you can browse all your shared media files with ease on the big screen and play what you want. Add a few customized mods like Media Browser and you get full media details, actor info, season covers, backdrops and its a gorgeous interface - all free.

      I can kick back, bring up the interface, scroll around and pick…oh lets say en episode from Season 5 of NCIS….watch it, flcik around and pick an episode frm Season 2 of the Sopranos….etc all without getting off my arse wink Awesome when you have just over 6TB of movies and TV shows wink

      Throw the portable drives away wink\

      Nice link: http://www.hack7mc.com/ for all your WIn 7 Media Centre addons and mods. The ‘Hacks’ part is a misnomer.

    • Tator says:

      05:55pm | 13/01/12

      The Real Dave,
      Got my HTPC from Ebay for $240, is an old HP Media Centre with a 1.8 ghtz Core 2 Duo with 2 gig ram and tv tuner.  I also bought a 300Mbps Wireless N modem and a Billion 7800N to connect to my $150 from ebay Linksys NAS where all my media is stored, total cost for this media setup was $510, albeit, I have just upgraded the NAS to a terabyte and have upgraded my main PC’s ram to 8 gig and moving the 4 gig that was there into the Media Centre.  So setting up a media network isn’t enormously expensive and costs a little more than a decent PVR if you hunt around.  By setting this up, I have also set up my son’s laptop so he can access the NAS and watch his favourite movies without having to risk scratching the dvds.  I had to buy a wireless mini keyboard with a track pad but having just seen the new Logitech Touch K400 , I might just upgrade to that in the future as it will be a lot easier to surf the net with.  Maybe when hard drives come back down in price after a spike since the floods in Thailand I might add a couple more terabytes to the NAS even though it is only half full.

    • TheRealDave says:

      09:01pm | 13/01/12

      Yep, thats the way we’ll all be going soon Tator. Nice fat centralized media storage and stream it all over the house. Watch what you want, when you want, where you want on whatever you want.

      I have two lappies around the house and the kids can watch their crap on it. I can also stream to my Galaxy Tab both here and when I am out and about via Subsonic. Subsonic also has an Android app so basically ANY of our Android phones can stream all my media as well - no matter where they are as long as they can get on the net.

      I’m planning on getting an XBox for the girls room, mount up a big LCD down there and they can use the extender to stream all the stuff from my main box as well. Best of all - get the Kinect and they won’t even need a remote…just wave their hands around and all their TV and movies are there wink

      See, not hard at all - if you spend more than 5 minutes reading about the technology…and not just cutting and pasting media released and whats written on the side of the box ... and getting paid to do that….

    • JohnM says:

      12:06pm | 13/01/12

      There are two things that I will look for in my next tevision purchase 1) a television that turns the volume down when the adds come on and back up again for the program and 2) a remote control locator, with 4 in the family the first thing to go missing and the lst thing to be found - is the remote.

    • Seth Brundle says:

      01:59pm | 13/01/12

      Hmm, even just a volume levelling TV would be a big advancement.  I despise the difference in volumes when the ads come on, and even in the difference between channels.

    • JohnM says:

      12:09pm | 13/01/12

      Remember the days when you had to go to the TV to select a channel adjust the volume and remember how much slimmer people were then, introduce the remote and people go lazy and obese.

    • Alicia says:

      02:13pm | 13/01/12

      Yes because the single act of no longer having to get up to change the channel every now and then has made people obese. Unless people have to run 100m to do it?

      Has nothing do with food. At all.

    • meh says:

      12:11pm | 13/01/12

      “Wouldn’t it be great (and safe) to be able to be driving your car, and say “Smartphone, call work, tell them I’m going to be late””

      You can, voice activated phone calls have been around for a long time. Admittedly you tend to call Domino’s when asking for Wife though.

      I did like the image of talking into your phone to get it to write it out into a text message.

    • Ohmy says:

      12:11pm | 13/01/12

      “Which is just like, why?” .....What the? are you still at school?

      “kind of like curing cancer before the common cold”
      Here is your homework, go and research the mortality rate of cold vs cancer. If you still don’t get it, maybe you should become an entertainment organiser which you have eluded to enjoying.

      I read your articles Claire in hope that you will get better, i have concluded that your not following your passion.

    • Nathan Explosion says:

      12:28pm | 13/01/12

      I wish there was an option on new TVs to change the channel when you can’t find the remote. Couldn’t find the DVD remote for a week and couldn’t use the player to press start or enter. Highly annoying!

    • Johnnyquid says:

      12:32pm | 13/01/12

      I’m waiting for that technology from the movies to be available where you hit something and it works. Marty got the time machine to work by headbutting it. That Russian scientist in Armageddon got the space plow to work by bashing it with a wrench. I want that option with my electronics!

    • TheRealDave says:

      02:49pm | 13/01/12

      You just need to hit it in the right spot.

      *bang*

      ‘You aint nuthin but a hound dog….’

      Aaaaayyyyyy!

    • Tator says:

      05:57pm | 13/01/12

      The correct term for that is percussive maintenance.

    • Bryan says:

      01:10pm | 13/01/12

      “but I just don’t get why anyone would want to buy a TV or gaming console you have to talk to”

      Claire, for the technically literate that have just wasted one and a half minutes reading your comments they would say - It is better to say nothing and let people think you’re a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.

      I’d take the time to point out your errors but then that would be ten minutes I would never get back from someone that would not benefit one iota!

    • Seth Brundle says:

      02:02pm | 13/01/12

      She is pretty, though.

    • Jane2 says:

      02:10pm | 13/01/12

      Personally I couldnt think of anything worse than everything being voice activated.

      Could you imagine an entire open plan office full of people talking to their computers? The noise level would be extremely annoying and it would be impossible to talk on the phone and use the computer at the same time.

      Voice activated gaming? Same issue. Most serious gaming involves having real time conversations with those you are playing with while performing independent actions on a keyboard/mouse/joystick. If you are saying “turn right, shoot shoot shoot” to get the console to do what you want, you cant say all the other things you normally say to your team mates like “duck!”

      Voice activated TV? You are having a conversation with someone else in the room and the TV keeps changing channels in the background. You have someone talking on the phone at the other end of the room and they say “7” and the TV you are watching changes.

      I have heard someone suggest that you should be able to lock it to one voice…well that is one way to control what and how much TV your kids consume as surely every parent would lock it to their voice.

      I do agree she did have a lot of errors though.

    • Gary says:

      03:02pm | 13/01/12

      Jane, firstly there will never be games like that where you tell it where to move. They will attempt to use voice intiuitively, such as in conversations, or like they did in SOCOM. Secondly, there are ways around background noises, such as xbox’s way of saying “xbox, (command)”, as well as ‘training it’. Thirdly, voice activation will never replace controls, merely enhance. An entire office would never replace its machines with pure voice activation, only when necissary.

    • Jane2 says:

      01:53pm | 13/01/12

      Considering how many fights we had as a kid where we physically got up and forcibly changed channels, and I assume kids of teh remote age had physical fights for control of the remote, wouldnt voice controlled cause even more problems?

      There would be yelling and fighting, whoever has the loudest voice has control.

    • Baz says:

      03:52pm | 13/01/12

      This could change the course of the world in fact. Imagine a world where everyone was yelling all the time, because they were brought up learning that “he who yells the loudest, has the power”. *shudder*

    • nankypoo says:

      01:56pm | 13/01/12

      I shudder to think what might happen when my wife and my mother in law are watching AFL. They seem to spend a large proportion of the game screaming “kick it, you bloody fool!”

    • Kimbo says:

      04:07pm | 13/01/12

      So, what’s a “digital hard drive”? Is there an analogue variety that I’m not aware of?

    • stephen says:

      04:47pm | 13/01/12

      I like to think of meself as a bit of a nature-boy ... you know, I ride bicycles, don’t have a car, don’t burn my rubbish, don’t throw my gum outside and just love singing, but hell I got a lot of techno.

      I got a whole bag of wires, cords, connectors and plugs of all sorts ( those green coles bags come in handy) ; got me iPod, iMac, me HP laptop, discman, (boy, didn’t spellcheck hate that one ?) me razor, then I got a recharger for my bike batteries, me batteried speakers, me mobile phone, and camera - 2 of them - then I got batteries for me laptop speakers and then i got a charger for my laptop tele. remote.
      (Plus a few other wires and stuff, and i don’t know what they for.)

      ps   Is it any wonder why folk like me don’t eat their veges.

    • ImaWestie says:

      09:59pm | 13/01/12

      I have “voice activated television remote”, three in fact: they are called “children” and were invented well before the television.

    • Andrew says:

      09:11am | 14/01/12

      Completely agree with Claire. Although, the previous posters do have a point - there are universal remotes already out there raspberry

    • Drafnel says:

      09:45am | 14/01/12

      Why? Because they can.

      Because once they have something kind of working there’s a lot of pressure to try being first to market even if the thing is still pretty unrefined. Apple’s been doing that for years.

      And because they want product differentiation. And it gives them the opportunity to charge $2,000 for something that would otherwise cost $400 (a TV).

      The free market will soon tell them whether it’s a goer or not.

    • Ian1 says:

      01:39pm | 14/01/12

      A TV with an in-build microphone?  Which hooks up to the Internet…  In everyone’s homes?  Sure.  Why not.

    • Mr. Mulgrave says:

      06:14pm | 14/01/12

      I agree. Voice control belongs in the same category as touch control, motion control and 3D; a category which belongs firmly at the bottom of a bin at the bottom of the ocean. All horribly unrefined and useless technologies in my opinion.

    • steve says:

      09:32pm | 14/01/12

      I’ve already got voice control on my TV through my xbox. I stream almost everything I watch through my xbox and its now got ABC and SBS on demand. Anyway, the voice control doesn’t work for everything, but its fantastic. Being able to say ‘xbox pause’ from my counch when the phone rings, without having to press any buttons, is great. I can’t wait till the functionality is expanded.
      The idea of a bluetooth headset to do this is ridiculous and about 10 years out of date.

    • Callum Jones says:

      02:34pm | 15/01/12

      “Just a little wanky earpiece with a microphone that lets you control the content on your tv from anywhere in the house”

      Yes, because that whole Bluetooth headset thing really took off and everybody loves some gadget hanging off their ears while looking like an idiot.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

@TheStalwart an analyst in Sydney said it was a "sad day" http://t.co/vh4Yu4OgDD. I think he was just exhausted and gave up analyzing

ToryShepherd

@CatherineDeveny @sydwritersfest A wobble

Paul Colgan

RT @NASA: Amazing views from the International Space Station of Pavlof Volcano erupting in Alaska. http://t.co/vqBkkiOful

Paul Colgan

US Google Doodle features a girl's touching depiction of her father's return from Iraq http://t.co/4LiRFOntTY

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter