Two weeks ago I argued that, as a politician, real action on reducing carbon emissions is always going to be more about what individuals do than just what Governments do.

What can you do about climate change

That’s why yesterday I was excited to learn about a new initiative called one million women (www.1millionwomen.com.au). Now I doubt I would agree with the politics of all those backing this scheme, but that’s not the point.

What I agree with is their focus on keeping the politics out of this debate and focussing on the practical choices of individual Australian women.

If I could paraphrase, it’s all about empowering Australian women to take some power back about our environmental future – and by that I don’t mean political power. They are simply providing women with tools to assist their own consumption choices and not compromise the quality of life their families enjoy.

This is an initiative that seems to be trying to bypass politics and encourage changes to mainstream behaviour. On the website I did not find any lectures about climate change, there are no ‘dob in a sceptic’ hotlines or links to the ALP website (although there are several links to State Government websites who are supporting the programme). Rather,  their supporters include BP Australia, Telstra, the Australian Womens Weekly and Margaret Fulton.

They make a good point. 70% of purchasing decisions in the home are made by women. They have the power to change more of our household behaviour than anyone. I know that’s true in my house, I live with three beautiful women – two of whom are under the age of three – so their influence will only increase.

More than 20 years ago recyclers were seen as ’tree dwellers’ and using a roll on deodorant was the equivalent of bra burning feminism. In addition, having a water tank and designing your home to manage your energy efficiency was seen as an ‘alternative lifestyle’.  Thankfully, this has all changed today, and for the better.  These decisions are now simple mainstream common sense.

While everyone gets carried away with Copenhagen and the ETS, surely the real issue remains what changes we are going to make. Electricity prices are already going up and we are all very conscious of how much we spend on petrol. Our decisions on these issues this year will have a far greater impact on what we can spend on presents for our kids this Christmas, than probably anything else.

The challenge for ‘One Million Women’ will be to protect themselves from the Climate Institutes and others, including politicians,  who will seek to peddle their political messages through this forum.

I note that their upcoming seminar series includes speakers from Labor Governments, former Labor staffers and the Greens – but no-one from the Liberal Party. In the future it would be good for them to take a more a bipartisan approach. My preference is that they keep it real by keeping the politicians and climate change warriors out of it.

The day Julia Gillard turns up on the website is the day I will start to become cynical and see this as just another Getup initiative to get out the Labor vote. I hope they prove me wrong.

Advocating the case for a renewed focus on individual action does not provide a leave pass for politicians to walk away from actions by Governments. We’ll be dealing with one of those this week. But if you seriously think we hold all the answers and everyone else can just sit back feeling self righteous about having berated the Government, the Opposition or their local MP, then you’re kidding yourself.

The end game of our actions must be to impact people’s behaviour – not convert them to some new religious cause. How you do this by insulting people who have a different view to you and going out every day preaching to your own choir about how morally superior you are, is beyond me. But this is what we are seeing from the Rudd Labor Government on their flawed ETS.

Last week in Parliament Labor had the opportunity to create some good faith with the Opposition on their proposed ETS and failed. Instead they came into the Parliament every day, hurling insults and threats and taking the opportunity to play up the politics. Yet they maintain they want to do the right thing by the environment.

Fortunately one leader in Australian politics, Malcolm Turnbull, rose above the ruck and genuinely put the long term interests of future generations first - at some political cost to himself. When was the last time you saw Kevin Rudd do that?

As Opposition Leader, Malcolm stayed focussed on the negotiations, despite the challenges and distractions. If the environment came before politics, then the Prime Minister would have sought to help rather than hinder Malcolm Turnbull from achieving an outcome that the vast majority of Australians want – action on climate change that does not prejudice jobs and our economic future – in short, giving the planet the benefit of the doubt.

The momentum for how we become conscious of our environmental decisions is always assisted when the politics come out of it and the issue is allowed to gain mainstream acceptance. At present I believe the self righteous politics of climate change, pro and con, is the main stumbling block for achieving this shift.

Most importantly it is disenfranchising and seeking to polarise the great majority of Australians, both in terms of their own views and more importantly, their own behaviour. We need to get this debate back to the individual.

It’s about informed choices and responsible action. And that’s what One Million Women seems to be trying to do. I wish them well, just keep Julia and Kevin away from your media conferences – many have tried and failed.

29 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Patrick says:

      06:37am | 23/11/09

      I think you need to be more worried about Nick “it’s all a communist plot” Minchin than the government.

    • David says:

      08:03am | 23/11/09

      Apart from keeping politics out of it and I don’t believe for one second that they can , they MUST keep that fraud Al Gore completely out of it .
      I would like them to publicly denounce him and his devotees and also to denounce the hysterical approach of the Kruddites .
      If they do that , I will support them .

    • Tim says:

      08:32am | 23/11/09

      Scott,
      A climate sceptic party is a dead party. It is as simple as that.

    • David says:

      08:55am | 23/11/09

      Scott , who cares about the politics !
      Are you a climate sceptic or a climate septic ?

    • Paul says:

      09:16am | 23/11/09

      Scott, re Governnments can’t do real action. (?) You knew for 10 years that rising ocean levels was a likely scenario - why then did the Libs allow risky rampant development on beach frontages? Why did/do the Libs allow the self interested coal lobby skew balanced debate and policy? Why did the Libs starve industry research and development funds and force some of best and brighest energy and renewable scientists to work for other countries? Sounds like a bit of a wash-your-hands of responsibility and past incompetent national planning.  Why should we believe that you want to jump on the bandwagon after a decade of dragging the chain and obstructionism? Are you going to allow energy companies to rort the community using climate as an excuse? Instead of applauding women and their efforts - what are YOU going do as a profiled community leader?

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      09:21am | 23/11/09

      When the Liberal Party or Labor Party commits to building nuclear power plants, then I will know it is serious about climate change…..

    • Charles says:

      09:58am | 23/11/09

      Scott, time to get with the rest of your sceptic mates like Nick Minchin et al before all the fraud and cover-ups perpetrated by IPCC contributing scientists starts to get some airplay.

      You might also dump all those feel-good and wishful thinking initiatives like this one which just distract from the reality and forms us into silly little groups that actually cause more grief than good.

      That is what I would do if I was a politician interested in improving the human condition, and not the human position of yourself.

    • Paul Horn says:

      10:21am | 23/11/09

      Well if one million women are behind this stunt then I am now completely convinced that this whole thing is nothing but a total lying scam. If you want to reinforce a lie then the best tactic in this day and age would be to get a million women on your side. Never ending gabfests about what we should be doing,  blaming blokes of course who are at the root of every devious right wing conspiracy all the while turning their air conditioners up and blasting around massive air conditoned shopping centres for “cofees” with girlfriends in their big 4WD’s.

      Yeah what a great idea. That just what we need a million morally superior supercilious Western women wagging their collective fingers at the patriarchy. You liberal elites make me sick!

    • Frankie V. says:

      10:24am | 23/11/09

      When the Liberal Party or Labor Party commits to building nuclear power plants, then I will know it is serious about climate change…..

      Exactly.

      How many Labor identities, while in opposition, claimed Carbon Sequestration wouldn’t work?  Now, while in government, it’s their main policy (other than more taxes).

    • Bob H says:

      10:34am | 23/11/09

      All a marketing opportunity and phoney.  If you are concerned with the environment do something about it yourself and don’t bleat on about it.  Get rid of your cars, cut yourself off the electricity grid, no travelling, no shopping malls and when you’ve done all that, well done.

    • Patrick says:

      10:48am | 23/11/09

      Peace in our time “Realist.”

    • Paul says:

      10:52am | 23/11/09

      Shane, instead of being a nuclear robot, why not readup on how the other only countries where nuclear economics ‘works’ is where the governments massively subsidises the plants. But then the taxpayers are fully liable for any leaks or cleanups because insurance companies won’t touch nuclear plants- not even the supposedly ‘safe’ latest generation of reactors. What’s wrong with that picture? Us taxpayers have shelled out massive extra taxes to subsidise the coal industry why tax us more for nuclear?

    • Eric says:

      11:27am | 23/11/09

      Paul - if you’re so dead set about opposing government subsidies for energy, then you should oppose emissions taxes being used to support “green” power.

    • Bethany says:

      11:56am | 23/11/09

      David (08:03am | 23/11/09), you’re likely to be disappointed.
      The 1 Million Women campaign is the first major national initiative of Climate Coolers, a not-for-profit, non-partisan women’s organisation that exists to engage the women of Australia on climate change and drive practical action to cut greenhouse gas pollution.
      The CEO of Climate Coolers is Natalie Isaacs, an Al Gore ambassador, personally trained by the former vice president of the United States to deliver his world famous and spectacular slide show.

    • Paul says:

      12:36pm | 23/11/09

      Eric, Yep actually I do. Mainly as I don’t believe this is about being a smart energy country, it’s about the big companies positioning themselves to protect old energy technology, their profit margins, and develop some more rorts like the ‘Green Power’ schemes electricity companies currently use. But taking the green out of the tax: I equally oppose the 10% GST scam tax to fund Lib/Labor middleclass votebuying schemes. Thats as costly, timewasting headache for a small business like me - as any green tax. Plus Rudd/Howard and Scotty here, expect me to be a free ‘tax’ collector for them! Whose debating that? What about you then Eric, do you oppose the GST scam -tax or are you like the others screaming because this tax has a green flavour to it’s marketing?

    • Eric says:

      12:56pm | 23/11/09

      The GST is not a “scam” tax—it’s a rationalisation of differing state sales taxes used to fund the states.

      As for power, I favour nuclear because it is the most practical and sustainable alternative presently available - and we happen to be sitting on a third of the world’s known uranium reserves. If it takes a little public money to kick-start the industry, I’m all for it. Better than penalising the whole economy in order to build useless windmills.

    • Frankie V. says:

      01:06pm | 23/11/09

      Australia is the 14th largest economy in the world (by nominal GDP).  Every nation above it, other than Italy which buys 10% of its electricity from French nuclear plants, generates its own nuclear energy.  Even Sweden, held up by every leftie and his pekingese as the model society, has ten nuclear plants generating 42% of its own power, and 10% of neighbouring Denmark’s.

      Australia, New Zealnd and Iceland will soon be the only nations in the OECD not using nuclear in their mix of power sources, and Australia will be the only one of those three without volcanoes.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_by_country

    • DocBud says:

      01:08pm | 23/11/09

      Actually, as of now it’s 11608 women. I’m confident that they can count out my wife, my daughters, my wife’s friends and the wives and daughters of my friends and colleagues. In fact, why don’t they have a count me out button like the science museum in the UK?

      http://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/proveit.aspx

      I’d be greatly surprised if they can muster one million genuine Aussie, gullible women, I have far more faith in the innate common sense of Aussie women coupled with their entirely appropriate desire for the finer things in life. But I could be wrong, it has surged to 11612 gullible women.

    • Frankie V. says:

      01:19pm | 23/11/09

      Don’t think of them as vote buying schemes Paul, think of them as wealth distribution schemes, in some cases distributing the wealth amongst its original and rightful owners.

      You like wealth distribution don’t you?

    • Frankie V. says:

      01:29pm | 23/11/09

      I think that should read “redistribution.”

    • Paul says:

      01:43pm | 23/11/09

      Eric, it takes little public money to kick start the nuclear industry? That’s not how the nuclear economics ‘works’ - not ever in the global history of the nuclear industry. The investment is to huge, with a long lead time til the reactor starts returning money ie 7-12ish years. And then a gi-normous power surge of mostly unsaleable oversupplied electicity when they finally switch the plant on. If the GST is a state tax, how exactly and why exactly, did Howard accrue 11 billion dollars in Canberra (taking the money effectively out of circulation out of economy ie industry wasn’t investing those billions in equipment or tech etc) a few years after the GST was brought in? It’s a scam.

    • DocBud says:

      03:01pm | 23/11/09

      Paul,

      Sea levels have been rising for 10000 years, you’d have thought the pollies would have stopped it by now.

    • Liz says:

      03:08pm | 23/11/09

      Yes,yes all good.What about where the focus really needs to be…big industry and business reducing pollution,emissions,power and water use.Let’s get real here.

    • Paul says:

      03:14pm | 23/11/09

      @frankie Whew! The old trusty Commie trap eh? Did you read my posts? And no, I don’t consider buying Aussie households widescreens or a new hastily built classroom wealth ‘redistribution’. Do you? Turning some kids into red hot inventors, engineers and scientists, and keeping them in Oz may ‘distribute’ global wealth Australias way.

    • Paul says:

      04:31pm | 23/11/09

      @Docbud And streets and townships have already been washed into the sea in the last few decades. You’d have thought politicians would’ve stopped it by now. And your point is?

    • Eric says:

      05:55pm | 23/11/09

      Calm down, Paul.

      Take a Bex and have a good lie down.

    • paul says:

      06:26pm | 23/11/09

      Thanks Eric Im already chilled brother. Living in Byron bay makes that easy except for those pesky schoolies. wink I guess you don’t get much fanmail but it is cool to test people out of their comfort zones, especially political leaders. We live in a great country and these issues deserve robust debate - thats my only angle. Are you chilled Eric?

    • Eric says:

      11:17pm | 23/11/09

      I’m quite chilled, thanks to “global warming”.

 

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

David Penberthy

@geoffb oh, diddums.

David Penberthy

@Adam_Sims hell yeah. the recent past of australian tennis is in doubt!

David Penberthy

Libs reckon the future of australian tennis is in doubt due to rudd's ETS. They're smoking the same stuff as screaming lord monckton #qt

tory_maguire

RT @penbo: Question Time live on http://www.thepunch.com.au 2pm mr straight talk vs kevin king of the kids from qanda

Gentle jabs to the ribs

US Superbowl: now with ad breaks worth watching

US Superbowl: now with ad breaks worth watching

Usually, when it comes to watching your favourite sport or movie on television, ads are the last thing… Read more

8 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter