OK, so I know the drill is that we’re meant to dust off our LPs and find the angriest Midnight Oil lyric about uranium mining or nuclear war, present it as a damning tearsheet, and then use a photograph such as the one below - taken at the Sydney protests against French nuclear tests in the Pacific in 1995 - to declare that Environment Minister Peter Garrett is the mother of all hypocrites.

Don't wanna be the one, unless compelled by Cabinet solidarity

It was certainly the position Malcolm Turnbull took last night after Garrett signed off on the Four Mile Uranium Mine in South Australia. Turnbull might be our alternative, conservative prime minister but he sounded for all the world like some campus Trotskyist as he led the sell-out charge against the former Oils frontman.

“What this approval just shows today is that Mr Garrett is as big a phoney as the Prime Minister,” Turnbull said, happily side-stepping the fact that, in endorsing Australia’s fifth uranium mine, Garrett has done the exact thing the Liberal Party has been urging him to do.

Whether you agree with uranium mining or not isn’t really the point here - for what it’s worth, my view as a South Australian is that this mine will provide another valuable boost to the state’s economic resurgence, and that the challenge of climate change and advancements in safety mean we should re-think our position on every aspect of nuclear power.

There’s a more fundamental point which goes to how a person’s opinions are allowed to evolve, and whether they should ever be permitted to adjust or compromise their beliefs in keeping with other members of their organisation.

Think back to your youth, even to a decade ago, and there would be plenty of things you believed then, or thought you knew then, which you have jettisoned entirely - some of them in embarrassment. Others you will have modified or finessed in light of gathered wisdom and experience.

This is where the Libs have played a silly game with Garrett which makes them look like petty point-scoring opportunists. For years, the conservatives have poked fun - and deservedly so - at Labor’s absurd “three mines policy”, which is the ideological equivalent of a half-pregnancy, and demanded that Labor abandon such nonsense.

Now that the party has done just that - after Garrett found himself on the losing side, despite speaking forcefully against any expansion of uranium mining at the party’s 2007 conference -  the Government is doing precisely what the Opposition has urged it to do by approving new mines.

Whether Garrett has honestly changed his mind, or is just acquiescing to party rules and cabinet solidarity, should really both be moot points for the Libs, who look juvenile for teasing the bloke for adopting the very approach they’ve been demanding for decades.

It’s a fine tactic for the Greens to adopt but for the Libs it’s just posturing which reflects more on them than it does on Garrett.

Most commented

30 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Terry P says:

      08:10am | 16/07/09

      Turnbull is “in favour” of the Uranium Mine…....He is just pointing out that Peter Garrett was “not in favour” of Uranium Mining and now he has changed his mind. Gee how you guys put so much spin on everything!

    • James says:

      08:17am | 16/07/09

      Are you a member of the Labor Party?

    • Laurel says:

      08:22am | 16/07/09

      The headline to this story doesn’t make any sence???????

    • Mervin says:

      08:31am | 16/07/09

      “but it’s the Liberals who are hypocrites” where in this story does it show that? I’m not even a Liberal suporter, but this story is rediculas.

    • Keith says:

      08:47am | 16/07/09

      Unless I’m missing something, isn’t Peter Garrett the hypocrite here?

    • Dilco says:

      09:10am | 16/07/09

      History will judge this generation as the one that messed it all up by supporting an impotent Labor goverment. If you can’t see the mess at the State level and the ‘rob from the rich and give to the poor and take it back from the poor’ tricks of the Federal government then this country deserves everything that is coming to it.

    • Mary-Ellen says:

      09:19am | 16/07/09

      Turnbull bashing gone wrong on this one. LOL

    • Eric says:

      09:22am | 16/07/09

      Good start, Pete!

      Now build some nuclear power plants.

    • Peter says:

      09:24am | 16/07/09

      The honourable option for a Minister who disagrees with a decision is to resign from Cabinet.

      Garrett has not done so.  So he was either lying in 2006, or he is now a hypocrite who enjoys the spoils of Ministerial life over personal integrity.

      Either way, he is unfit to serve.

    • Helen says:

      09:43am | 16/07/09

      Garrett you should go back to singing, because you look very uncomfortable saying things you don’t believe in!

    • Julia says:

      09:46am | 16/07/09

      Turnbull your right for once on this one…...what a silly headline?

    • Yazmine says:

      10:18am | 16/07/09

      As usual Labor showing they have no guts to stand up to anyone, always taking the easy option of agreeing to whats popular for them. Keeping voters on side! even if it means changing their mind, The only time they show some guts is when they can attack Turnbull so they can remain top of the polls.

    • Mark B says:

      10:33am | 16/07/09

      Mr Garrett is successfully emerging from Mr Rudd’s “Behaviour Modification Therapy” program. Yes, he’s a goose, but he is making the transition to adulthood. I studied Nuclear and Radiation Chemistry in the 70’s, when the Whitlam government was going to build a Nuclear Power Station at Jervis Bay. Students thought is was a bad idea, so our disgusted Professor used to carry nuclear isotopes in his pocket as a demonstration of his confidence. We just assumed he didn’t want to have any more children. Since then we’ve had Cernobyl, Three Mile Island, and half a dozen nuclear submarines sunk and now sitting on a seabed somewhere. It also hasn’t helped to hear the previous US President talking authoratively about matters “Nucular”; oh dear. But at the end of the day, times have changed, Sydney is no longer choked with coal smoke on a winter night, and nuclear power will simply be the only option for many countries because it can now be managed quite safely. As for Mr Turnbull, he is simply demonstrating what many have suspected and some have stated, he has poor judgement. He is also a political novice. The Liberals would probably still be in Government had they changed to Mr Costello in 2006; now look at the mess they are in.

    • K says:

      10:48am | 16/07/09

      David Penberthy understands hypocrisy in the same way Alanis Morrisette comprehends irony.

    • G says:

      10:56am | 16/07/09

      I don’t want to see nuclear power stations in Australia full stop.  But I do support uranium mining - it’s a commodity and good for our economic needs.  I fully support Peter Garrett in this decision as it is the best thing to do for the country and don’t believe he has compromised his principles - however Turnbull has no principles he just floats about grandstanding from one issue to the next as a political opportunist and you never really know what he believes in apart from the almighty dollar.

    • Charles says:

      11:08am | 16/07/09

      Best comment I heard was on 774ABC this morning, effectively the journalist stated that PG ‘responded to questions on how he justified his decision by saying: ‘I’m in the cabinet and must follow the party line’ .  This does not explain how he is able to justify the decision according to his formerly stated beliefs - especially those on the campaign trail.

      Peter, as others have said, was a great singer.  Yesterday however, he looked to me to be as uncomfortably self conscious ‘reeling off Kevinisms’ as a certain teenager when he was ribbed by his fellow pupils for his snowy-hair-turned-green-by-chlorine after too much time in the pool.

    • George says:

      11:16am | 16/07/09

      I thought the story was about the Liberals being hypocrites? According to the headline anyway, The story doesn’t support the headline.

    • Gerry says:

      11:20am | 16/07/09

      Garrett maybe saying and doing what Rudd tells him to do, but he looks and sounds very uncomfortable doing it.

    • Uma says:

      11:28am | 16/07/09

      Labor put Garrett where he is because he was popular,(more votes) which he was, AS A SINGER, not in politocs!

    • RT says:

      11:33am | 16/07/09

      I don’t know what made Garrett decide to join the ALP and stand for election. I’m pretty sure it was not the lure of the MP’s salary and pension. He must have thought he could achieve something useful by his own lights. Wonder how he’s feeling about that after this and other decisions he’s announced as minister?

      MarkB, glad to see your mention of the Liberal government of 40 years ago and its crazy plan to build a nuclear reactor at Jervis Bay. I was one who protested against it. It’s a long time since I lived there but it’s a comfort to know that it’s there in a relatively pristine state unsullied by a nuclear reactor.

    • watty says:

      11:47am | 16/07/09

      Turnbull knows better.Permission for new uranium mine in Aiustralia is a Cabinet decision and ironically Garrett is the messenger.

      Turnbull’s position on Kyoto and now the “Global Warming” tax is more hypocritical than any position Garrett has been FORCED to take..

      Perhaps the “Doctor’s Wives” in the Eastern Suburbs forced Malcolm to take his stance?

    • Mark B says:

      11:55am | 16/07/09

      RT I have scuba dived there many, many times and it is a beautiful place. I’m not so sure I would have done that if there was a now 35 year old nuclear power station using the water to cool reactors.

    • phil says:

      12:32pm | 16/07/09

      My god i agree with you david I hope its not the last.To the rest of the liberal hacks the point is this the liberals want uranium mining then they bag garret 4 approving it. As 4 turnbull calling people phoney it just gets worst from this clown. So were do you stand on a repubalic now malcom

    • Allen says:

      12:59pm | 16/07/09

      Phil - the Liberals want uranium mining “correct” and they bag Garrett for approving it “correct” because he was ANTI uranium mining in case you forgot.

    • Ian says:

      02:46pm | 16/07/09

      Peter Garrett: Every appearance a sell-out smile

    • Ross Grove says:

      04:17pm | 16/07/09

      There’s something to be said for representing one set of values in an election year and then implimenting another. The opposition would not be doing its job if they didn’t draw our attention to this - in fact I reckon there’d be someone criticising them for not properly holding the government to account.

    • Sean M says:

      04:21pm | 16/07/09

      “Think back to your youth, even to a decade ago, and there would be plenty of things you believed then, or thought you knew then, which you have jettisoned entirely - some of them in embarrassment. Others you will have modified or finessed in light of gathered wisdom and experience.”

      Would you mind giving us a personal example David?

    • Al says:

      04:47pm | 16/07/09

      How naive are we to argue about whether a pollie believes in his party’s policy? Most adults know politicians have to operate within boundaries and make personal compromises.
      We should appreciate the rare occasion of knowing what an MP believes in. Most of them are careerist vacuums.
      We know Garrett entered politics for the right reasons. He had more experience of the world than almost all his peers in Canberra. And he understood that he would be skewered for every move to the right of Marx.

    • Dissident says:

      06:20pm | 16/07/09

      How can you say that the Liberals are the ones being hypocrites? They are for Uranium mining and are open to the idea of adopting nuclear energy. Peter Garrett has for years been vehemently opposed to such things but is now approving them. I wouldn’t go so far as to say that he’s a hyprocrite so much as a man completely lacking in credibility, for either he would now publicly admit that the beliefs he had previously held were wrong or if he truly had conviction in them he would have resigned from the ALP when it overturned the “three mines” policy. The true hypocrites are the ALP though - for they are completely against nuclear energy and will not even entertain discussion of it, but are all for digging up Uranium!

    • Mark B says:

      09:19pm | 16/07/09

      As I stated above, I studied Nuclear and Radiation Chemistry in the late 1970’s when it was moving from a science of bomb making to energy making. We must remember that in those days it was still a dangerous science and the Labor Party embraced that reality. Mainframe computers then typically had a small fraction of the power of today’s personal computer. Monitoring a nuclear reactor was experimental. Dealing with the bi-product was experimental and largely consisted of throwing it in a drum out of sight, and hoping for a future solution. Today this has all changed and nuclear energy has become mainstream in many parts of the world, largely due to advances in science. Meanwhile we have finally faced up to the fact that injecting massive amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere is probably unwise, but there remains argument about the actual effects, be they global warming evidenced by the melting of glaciers worldwide and the northern polar icecape, increased acidity of the sea, and so on. A conservative view of the world suggests that there is now a more important debate about whether coal based energy is more costly in the long run than nuclear based energy. I don’t know the answer and there are all sorts of spruikers around, ranging from the “lefty” and “greeny” to the market traders like Goldman Sachs who are promoting a global “cap and trade” system for carbon offsets, one which they hope to have a central trading role in, and not necessarily because they are philosophically concerned about the environment. So it is difficult to know what to believe, but it is important that we shake off our individual bias and understand the issues, because this is likely to be the biggest decison in mankinds history to date.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter