By now, you’ve probably heard about Happy Feet, the ailing emperor penguin who was found near New Zealand a few months back. After rehab, Happy Feet was released this week, only to go missing somewhere in southern waters.

I am not an animaaaaal! Pic: manatees.net

Some say he was gobbled by an orca. We think he might’ve been munched by a huge manatee, even though said mammals reside only in the northern hemisphere. Hey, never let the truth get in the way of a good headline.

Dead or alive, Happy Feet has captivated everyone. This is not unusual. Animal stories are always popular in any form of media, especially online. And if you think about it, that says something gently profound about our own humanity.

Yesterday was like any other day in the media. On the online News Ltd mastheads alone, at least two new random animal stories did the rounds.

There was the herd of cows serenaded by jazz musicians, and the Malaysian orangutan who kicked her smoking habit, presumably because the habit was even more disgusting and smelly than rubbing her enormous butt in other orangutans’ faces.

And that was just yesterday. There’s always a new animal vid doing the rounds. If it’s not a surfing spider or a parachuting dog, it’s mice on bikes or a cupboard full of cockroaches who’ve formed a mariachi band.

On a simple level, these videos are charming. We love animal antics as part of our daily news mix because frankly, who can read another word on the bloody carbon tax? Was the carbon tax introduced into parliament yesterday? Who cares? Too busy watching the Marlboro monkey.

But some animal stories are much more than diversions. Sometimes, they provide a vital frame through which we consume serious news, and there have been several stunningly good examples of this in recent years.

Think back to the 2009 Victorian bushfires. The enduring image, apart from Christina Nixon’s mushroom risotto, was Sam the Koala guzzling a plastic bottle of spring water from a benevolent fire fighter.

That’s not to make light of the 173 people who died, or the towns that disappeared overnight. It’s just that people needed a symbol, a victim who was outside the realm of blame, responsibility and politics. In the 2003 Canberra bushfires, Lucky the Koala performed a similar role.

In Japan this year, the scenes after the earthquake and tsunami were so spectacularly devastating, it was as impossible to watch as it was not to watch.

Then came the Fukushima nuclear disaster, a catastrophe which was a much harder story to comprehend, especially after the unbelievable giant sea waves we’d all just watched ad nauseam on YouTube. Compared to raw tsunami footage, the threat of radiation and potential gene mutation was a heck of a hard sell as a news story.

Then along came the Fukushima Bunny. Half cute, half gross-out, this soft little white rabbit rammed home the nuclear threat like no story of human misery could.

We’ve seen the same effect in too many oil spills to mention. No matter how many fisheries are destroyed, or human livelihoods lost, it ain’t a serious oil spill till you see the doomed pelican covered in sludge.

Animal stories help us make sense of the world, even when they don’t relate directly to a particular disaster or other major news event. That’s what made Happy Feet such a good story.

Here was a classic 21st century environmental tale. Sick penguin is found eating sticks and sand. Animal rescuers do their thing, attach a transmitter, release him back into the wild and we all briefly dwell in the sheer wonder of the animal world, as this brave little penguin tries to swim his way back to Antarctica.

And then his beeper stops beeping and we all wonder what has happened. We still don’t know.

For all the intrigue behind the Happy Feet story, there is a darker side. Quite simply, why is it that we attach almost human qualities of determination and will-to-live to a penguin’s travails at sea, when we dehumanise people who make much scarier journeys on leaky boats off Australia’s northern coastline?

Remember, many of these people are fleeing regimes so evil we’ve committed our own troops to fighting them.

Seems sometimes our sense of humanity is much more easily stirred by the plight of animals than by actual humans.

66 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • stephen says:

      07:21am | 14/09/11

      People aren’t edible, which kind of discounts them as commodious fodder.
      The boaties can’t complain ; they get more attention of the kind kind than they got before they fled their homeland : A bed, food, a nurse, and The Greens.
      Whether we are undecided and a little haphazard as to the protocols of aid, well, that’s our problem, and if new arrivals want to go to law, maybe, while they’re at it, might want to check on the legal advice about hometown despots.
      We are getting taken for a ride.
      Put them in the army, train them, send them back with our lads, and let’s see what they’re made of.

    • Kika says:

      11:45am | 14/09/11

      Hey they are edible to the ancient Polynesians and Melanesians. Some tribes reportedly still do in PNG.

    • Fiddler says:

      07:26am | 14/09/11

      I seriously doubt the trip is “much scarier”, the penguins have sharks, killer whales to deal with. Maybe if the asylum seekers had an out of control tiger on board it would be an accurate comment.

      We also don’t dehumanise them, we simply don’t buy into their moral blackmail that they impose upon us after they pass through half a dozen other countries with the passports that they throw out when they jump on the boat to come here.

    • fairsfair says:

      09:08am | 14/09/11

      Yeah honestly, I am tired of being told I am “heartless” purely because I ask questions. I was watching the Drum last night and was shocked to see the panelists freely discussing how the notion that “humanity” is solely an attribute o the left. Its f* rediculous. How dare Tony Abbott attack the Malaysia Solution “from the left” on the grounds of the care of the people… argh - it is infuriating. 

      They get on a boat from Indonesia. Are they escaping adversity there? If so, why aren’t we taking thousands of Indonesian asylum seekers either via boats or legitimate channels? How come we are holidaying in Indonesia? How come we aren’t sending more aid (than we currently do) to Indonesia?

      It seems clear to me that they are safe in Indonesia, they are just gunning for Australia however and commit to the trip. You can’t blame them, I’d prefer to be here too, but that shouldn’t be how the world works.

    • iansand says:

      09:37am | 14/09/11

      fairsfair - I think that the problem is that, whenever a “humanitarian” angle is mentioned, the reflexive rightists attack it as being a lefty plot.  It happens on the Punch almost every day.  The rightists have made that particular bed for themselves.

    • fairsfair says:

      10:31am | 14/09/11

      hmm, fair point Iansand.

      I just wish there was more of a distinction between caring and looking at the bigger picture (ie longterm safety and border security. Even whether or not these things are even an issue we should be concerned about) and immediately stating that someone who is for offshore processing is a horrible jerk.

      Responding to hysteria with hysteria is not really productive.

      The Malaysian Solution is interesting though. It is receiving opposition from both sides and I don’t think that is simply political opportunity from the right (though I am sure they are not overly bummed that it is bringing some results for them). I am all for offshore processing as a disincentive, but at least the Pacific Solution saw Australia the ability to care for and monitor the treatment of the people. I personally think that dumping them in Malaysia is just as bad as turning the boat around, giving them a jerry can and saying good luck.

    • Dieter Moeckel says:

      11:32am | 14/09/11

      Dumping them anywhere is immoral. Unfortunately the whole issue is now political. From political opportunism of “we decide who ...etc” to save the boat people from themselves by putting the people smugglers out of business.”
      The real solution is bring them to Australia - imprison the ‘smugglers’ i.e. boat’s crew with mandatory sentences (not mandatory detention for asylum seekers.) Do health checks and set them free with parole provisos which if violated result I’m immediate deportation. Then process to your hearts content and send back the illegitimate asylum seekers. So simple its a no-brainer. But politics has trumped common sense.
      Nauru is the equivalent of Devil’s Island or Norfolk Island in the 19th century - simply a prison.

    • Fiddler says:

      12:36pm | 14/09/11

      for the funniest animal video go to youtube and type in the words “frog monkey” you won’t regret it

    • fairsfair says:

      12:55pm | 14/09/11

      Yes but Dieter, processing these people as a priority sends the message that it is the most time economical means to gain entry. I don’t want to use the term queue jumper, but I guess even though destroyed by rhetoric - it is an apt description. There needs to be a queue somewhere and I apprecaite that that is what the Malaysian Solution was seeking to underline, but granted Australia has no control over treatment -it is not acceptable.

      I don’t feel it right to welcome people who land on our shores illegally with open arms, irrespective of their situation. I don’t belive that that is inhumane as they are not subject to persecution and abuse in countries such as Indonesia. Immediately bringing them onshore sends a message and further delays the applications of those who are seeking asylum via legitimate means.

      I don’t know what that solution is, but swift onshore processing of those who land on Christmas Island ahead of all others is not the answer. We see some of those who are declined asylum destroy the centres, embark on hunger strikes etc. I know it is not all, but it is some and we can’t afford to keep pumping tax payer money into the actions of so very few people. It will, if anything, encourage more people to take the journey. I don’t want to see that - not because “I dont’ want them in my country” - I don’t want them to die in a rickety boat in horrible seas or shunted around this country from centre to dodgy motel, to Darwin Aparment complex to Scherger. Its just seems unfair to them, unfair to the Australian people (in that they are political bread and butter it almost seems) and even more unfair to those waiting desperately to become an Australian.

      @Fiddler - that poor frog! I do regret it!

    • Phil says:

      08:26am | 14/09/11

      Animals are innocent and have not caused their own problems, humans on the other hand are the problem.

      But be on the look out for a penguin who has used New Zealand as a back door to get in to Australia, he wont have his passport or tracker and might just wash ashore expecting to be given food, water, shelter and welfare payments, and after that im sure he will tell all his relo’s to do the same as it worked for him.

    • Steve says:

      08:50am | 14/09/11

      Phils right -we can look at an animal’s plight without judgement or questioning their own culpability. 

      With humans we have to ask what decisions (by them or us) led them into the newsowrthy situation.

    • MarkS says:

      08:56am | 14/09/11

      @Phil
      Animals are innocent? Innocent is the opposite to guilty. If one cannot be guilty one cannot be innocent. Most animals are incapable of understanding the concept of right & wrong & therefore are neitheir innocent nor guilty. Might as well call a tree innocent.

      As for Sharwood’s emotional blackmail deceit , bah humbug. Do not try to sell me a bridge, you are not as good a con man as you think.

    • Kika says:

      09:09am | 14/09/11

      Phil Kiwis aren’t entitled to Australian welfare since 2002!

    • Phil says:

      09:46am | 14/09/11

      @Mark,
      Its not about how they understand it or trying to say they are or aren’t guilty of something, its how we can view them without judgement for what they are, where they are going or what they are doing.
      An innocence of knowledge or awareness of whats going on around them.
      A tree cant make up its own mind and make decisions that affect its life, animals can so you cant say that a tree is innocent.

      I was also disappointed by the lack of links to the video of the cockroach mariachi band , gets us in with things like that and then bam, boat people.

      @Kika
      Doesnt really matter, its not the Kiwi’s expecting the dole or handouts, most of us come here and have worked hard every day since we arrived.
      It was a cheap shot at how during the later part of the 90’s there was a big movement of Asians living in NZ for the minimum time to become a citizen which then allowed them to move to AU once they were successful. Using NZ as a stop over back door to get what they really wanted.

    • Jay Santos says:

      08:42am | 14/09/11

      “...when we dehumanise people who make much scarier journeys on leaky boats off Australia’s northern coastline?...”

      People who are presumably rich enough to pay people smugglers tens of thousands of dollars but not rich enough to fly Tiger Airway’s into Darwin and simply overstay their visa like all the other “Asylum Seekers” the bleeding hearts keep banging on about.

      Sharwood’s assumption that refugees are poor illiterate dumbasses is disingenuous.

      They know exactly what they are doing.

      After being worded up by Indonesian smugglers about those soft touch Skippy’s, they arrive in Australian territorial waters; are immediately fed and clothed, given accomodation, free access to our legal system, phones and internet and the right to destroy government property with impunity.

      But destroy your ID first so they don’t know who you are.

      What’s so scary about all that?

      “...Remember, many of these people are fleeing regimes so evil we’ve committed our own troops to fighting them…”

      Explain the influx of Sri Lankan boat people then?

    • Kika says:

      09:06am | 14/09/11

      Ahhh… because the Sri Lankan government has covered up the truth about what happened up in Jaffna. There are still mines and unexploded devices everywhere and they are still discriminated against as a people in their own country.  Women were raped by the Singhalese army, men kidnapped and executed regardless of their political beliefs.  Would you leave? After 50 years of war and persecution against the Tamils I would probably say - YES!

      And… because you were questioning ID how do you get your papers together if the army has blown your town to smitherines and trying to escape from them when they are STILL denying the truth as to what actually happened would be impossible.

      I tried to go to Sri Lanka last year but apparently we were warned Tamils were still being harassed IN Colombo (road blocks, arbitrary detention of Tamils with overseas passports) so we decided against it. Probably a good thing seeing the atrocities still going on up north.

    • Shane says:

      09:13am | 14/09/11

      Gee, thanks Jay Santos. Reading through your tripe gave me the perfect insight into why I prefer animal stories. Humans (such as Jay) are much more likely to be sanctimonious prats banging on about issues they don’t - or won’t even try to - understand than that cute, innocent penguin flapping about trying to survive.

    • Anna C says:

      09:37am | 14/09/11

      “I tried to go to Sri Lanka last year but apparently we were warned Tamils were still being harassed IN Colombo (road blocks, arbitrary detention of Tamils with overseas passports) so we decided against it.”

      Well Kika, that’s because the Tamils decided to take up arms and wage war against their government for over 30 years. Although atrocities were committed by both sides it was the Tamils who lost the war and now have to deal with the consequences. To the victors go the spoils as they say.

      As far as I’m concerned you reap what you sew in life. Just because they lost the war doesn’t give them the right to now demand that they live here.  Tamil Nadu is thousands of kilometres closer to Sri Lanka then us. Why do they make the treacherous journey to Australia? Because we are known internationally as a soft touch and will give them welfare benefits, housing, a better standard of living etc.

    • Jay Santos says:

      09:53am | 14/09/11

      “...I tried to go to Sri Lanka last year…”

      I was there on holiday two months ago.

      Saw nothing.  Heard nothing.

      Are you always prone to such overblown fear-mongering?

    • Kika says:

      10:35am | 14/09/11

      Anna C - Go learn something. Nice presumption. The Tamils didn’t decide to ‘take up arms’ - they were forced too.
      Do you want me to give you a history lesson?
      1) British left Sri Lanka and decided to leave the Singhalese majority in the south in charge because that’s where they happened to have their capital
      2) The Singhalese introduced the ‘Singhalese only act’ which systematically discriminated against all other ethnicities other than Singhalese leaving opportunities only open to other Singhalese, enforced Singhalese as the only language in Sri Lanka and had rights to ALL Land regardless of who owned the land
      3) They took land from Tamils, Burghers and Moors. This lead to the exodus of most of the Burghers, but because they were Dutch they could assimilate quickly into Australia. Geoff Janz and Jamie Durie are both Sri Lankan Burghers whos families fled after the Singhalese Only Act came into force
      4) Jaffna is a predominately agricultural area with no industry, so when they started losing their land and their way of life they became angry as they had no right to public recourse as the government also removed voting rights to the Indian migrant Tamils in the parliament
      5) The education system was changed to favour Singhalese so the first political movements occurred in universties
      6) The LTTE formed, internally wiped out all other peaceful protest groups and pioneered the suicide bomber
      7) The LTTE did NOTHING to help the Tamil people but acted as their own corrupt dictatorship
      8) Ask Sri Lankan people, most are peace loving people who have many friends from every ethnicity
      9) 1983 Riots - Singhalese rioted throughout Colombo for hours before the police intervened leading to many deaths of peaceful Tamil people.
      10) Whilst the world ignored Sri Lanka for many years the Socialist Singhalese movement continued to arrest and murder Tamils
      11) Fast forward to 3 years ago the war starts up North again. Entire towns are blown to smitherines, Hospitals, Schools, Women are raped by Sri Lankan army soldiers, their farms and livelihoods are destroyed… UN turns a blind eye and doesn’t intervene…

      ALSO… Anna did you care to research how long Tamils have lived in Sri Lanka? Thousands of years. They may have even been there longer than the Singhalese. They have nothing to do with India, and the language they speak is almost unintelligible to each other. Jaffna Tamil is the equivalent of someone speaking Middle English today. Could you understand someone speaking Middle English?

      Jay Santos - So I suppose you are a tourist, and stayed down the south in the safe areas. Are you a Tamil? Did you go to Jaffna by any chance? No scare mongering on my part. We were warned by our family that the road blocks were still going on and we were still hearing from other friends of friends that other Tamils were still being arrested arbitarily and never seen again. Our mail gets B&&Dy; tampered with when we send it back there for god sakes!

    • Kika says:

      10:42am | 14/09/11

      Oh… and Anna… Not every Tamil is a terrorist or LTTE sympathiser. They did nothing for their people and made life hell for peaceful lawful citizens who just happen to be of the same ethnicity as the terrorists.

    • Anna C says:

      12:48pm | 14/09/11

      Thanks for the history lesson Kika, but I am well aware of the rampant and entrenched discrimination faced by the Tamil people in Sri Lanka. That is still no justification for war.

      No side was blameless in this 26 year civil war and atrocities were committed against Ceylonese people as well as Tamils. It’s that old saying:  “one person’s terrorist is another person’s freedom fighter.’‘

      Regardless, that doesn’t give Tamils fleeing Sri Lanka or anyone else for that matter the right to demand to live here.  Immigration to this country must be done in an orderly way with the necessary health and identification checks done. There are 30 million refugees in this world and unlike some people, not all of them have the financial means to jump the queue and arrive here by boat.

    • Dieter Moeckel says:

      01:24pm | 14/09/11

      Jay,
      Have you considered that many of the people who use boats can’t get on ‘planes Tiger or otherwise. If they could I’m sure they would.
      Many of the commentators here have not heard or read the stories of refugees in Europe after wars there - pushing a wheel barrow with what little the can salvage - I encourage people to read widely about what refugees actually go through before they land in Indonesia to get onto a rickety boat.
      Read about the refugees from Cuba to Florida - on rafts of inner tubes -
      Overloaded boats throughout the Mediterranean.
      Australia is not the only country with a refugee problem the only issue is that ours is the smallest of the lot - Border protection, queues jumpers, illegal asylum seekers, people smugglers,  these are all emotive rhetorical political terms used to persuade and motivate a nation into xenophobia - Australians are not xenophobic at heart politics has manipulated opinion by dehumanising “boat people” into queue jumpers, illegals, deprivers of the rights of others etc preying on Australian’s nature of a “fair go” and “egalitarianism.
      Beware your government is making you appear xenophobic by exploiting your gal sense of a fair go.
      No more so than the right preying on your outrage of an unfair go in comparison to our own pensioners.
      Politics and propaganda is a fearsome weapon in the hands of the unscrupulous who will demonise the weak and vulnerable to incite anger and district - Listen carefully to Alan Jones and his ilk.
      Unless dehumanised no right thinking person would persecute the asylum seekers who come here by boat. The ALP has seen this and is now using the rhetoric of mandatory detention as a means of ‘saving” future boat people from risky dangerous voyages - Listen to the propaganda and think about it ...

    • Jay Santos says:

      01:51pm | 14/09/11

      “...Have you considered that many of the people who use boats can’t get on ‘planes Tiger or otherwise. If they could I’m sure they would…”

      Your statement is laid false by ample evidence to the contrary.

      Boat arrivals pay people smugglers TENS OF THOUSANDS of dollars to get them to Australian waters.

      Arriving by plane (legally) and overstaying they are on their own and at the risk of prosecution.

      Arriving by boat affords them the opportunity to exploit our legal system and enjoy the unaccountable largesse of this government and its people.

      The Fugee Outplacement Service in this country is extraordinarliy lucrative for an imminent immigrant.

      The numbers don’t lie.

    • Kika says:

      01:59pm | 14/09/11

      Anna C - 26 year? Where did you pull this from?  It’s been happening since the Act came in which was 1956, giving the Tamils a 55 year battle to win their rights back.

    • SimpleSimon says:

      08:55am | 14/09/11

      This is one of my favourite headlines yet posted on the punch!!

    • Tails says:

      03:16pm | 14/09/11

      +1 I think it’s been lost on most.

    • adam says:

      09:30am | 14/09/11

      I so hate it when someone brings up facts

    • iansand says:

      09:39am | 14/09/11

      They are also vegetarian.  Penguins are not vegetables.

    • adam says:

      11:01am | 14/09/11

      Penguins not vegies? But they taste so nice when chipped and deep fried

    • Kika says:

      11:47am | 14/09/11

      Yeah but in the southern hemisphere aren’t they called Dugongs? Well in Australia anyway. Their tail is different to the northern hemisphere ones.

    • Dieter Moeckel says:

      01:40pm | 14/09/11

      Dugongs, Manatees they are vegetarians with an occasional deviation to carnivorousness when either they stray into the Southern ocean (they then need the extra blubber a high protein diet provides) or when a penguin deviates into equatorial waters when they mistake them for nuns and Amish missionaries. They will also devour (as a group) any Holstein cow than falls into their water ways. They leave Dexters and Angus alone because their preys must be Black and White.

    • iansand says:

      03:38pm | 14/09/11

      Which reminds me of a joke about Dopey, the Pope and a penguin.

      The seven dwarfs were in Rome and had an audience with the Pope. They were sitting near the rear and as the Pope was speaking, they whispered and giggled amongst themselves, causing quite a disturbance. All of a sudden, Dopey stands up and says, “Holy Father, are there any midget nuns in the church ?” “No,” said the Pope, “There are no midget nuns in the church.”

      A little time passed and the dwarfs were again whispering and giggling amongst themselves causing quite a disturbance and disturbing the Pope.

      Soon, Dopey stands up again and asks, “Holy Father, are there any midget nuns in the Vatican?”

      “No, my son, there are no midget nuns in the Vatican or in the church.” says the Pope. Again the dwarfs resume their annoying giggling to the dismay of the Pope

      Once again, Dopey stands up and asks “Holy Father, are there any midget nuns in Rome?”

      “No, my son, there are no midget nuns in the Rome, in the Vatican, and no midget nuns in the church.” exclaimed the Pope, obviously upset.

      The dwarfs continue their interference.

      Dopey stands up and asks, “Holy Father, are there any midget nuns in the country?”

      The Pope, totally angered, exclaims “No, my son, there are no midget nuns in the church, in the city, in the state, no midget nuns in Italy, there are no midget nuns in the whole world!!! Now sit down!!!!!”

      Soon afterwards, a soft chant can be heard from the rear of the church, “Dopey fucked a penguin. Dopey fucked a penguin. Dopey fucked a penguin.”

    • Kika says:

      09:08am | 14/09/11

      Humans schnumans. 6 billion people on the planet. The asylum seeker issue is just a political point scoring exercise and has nothing to do with the actual welfare of the people.
      What I want to know is why the Australian government can’t set up processing centres in Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia where most of the refugees flee too. Wouldn’t this save lives, time and money?

    • Anna C says:

      09:20am | 14/09/11

      Ahhh the sting in the old tail. Thought as much ... couldn’t possibly have been a whole article about fluffy bunnies and the misadventures of a penguin.  I was thinking gee it must be a slow news day if he is writing about bunnies and penguins until I read the end of the article.

      What do you want us to say Andrew, that we are bad people for wanting to protect our borders and for wanting to decide who gets to live in our country?  How are we different to any other country in wanting this? Give me a break.

    • Kika says:

      02:33pm | 14/09/11

      Well we are different in the sense that we are one of the least desired countries to seek asylum from and receive one of the smallest number of ‘illegal’ arrivals than the other western countries in the UNHCR.

    • Elphaba says:

      09:56am | 14/09/11

      The ills of the world are going to come back to one thing - population control.  We can throw all the money and concern in the world towards ‘helping’ people, but the bottom line is, we will eventually breed ourselves to the point where it’s unsustainable.  In some areas, that’s now a reality.

      I prefer to donate to a charity which helps animals, rather than people.  Animals need all the help they can get.

      As for funny animal videos, this one is my favourite:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZS_6-IwMPjM

    • Anthony Sharwood

      Anthony Sharwood says:

      10:29am | 14/09/11

      I’d like to reply to Anna C and to everyone who takes offense with the asylum seeker/penguin analogy.

      First of all, I am as strong a supporter as anybody of an orderly approach to the problem of refugees making their way to Australia, legally or otherwise. Not for a minute do I deny Australia’s basic right to protect its own borders.

      When I used the term “dehumanised, I was referring to the overall state of the debate, rather than the methods used to deter and/or process asylum seekers.

      And what I mean by that is, we have tarred so many asylum seekers with the brush of opportunism, and in so doing, we have effectively turned every single asylum seeker into an opportunist who has willingly destroyed their passport and/or paid a hefty sum to a people smuggler.

      Clearly this is not the case. Clearly there are those who are truly desperate and those who are less so.

      But I think the whole debate over these people is conducted with the most pejorative language, and attitudes to match. They are called “threats” and illegals” and “queue jumpers”, and even though many of them may be just that, they are also humans - and quite possibly humans with problems many of us cannot imagine.

      So by all means, let’s protect our borders and seek order in the processing of people who seek asylum.

      I guess the point of this piece was just to contrast the way we always coo and gush over heartwarming animal stories, but have managed to cast the vast majority of asylum seekers in the most negative, often hateful light.

      This is not yet another rant about the left and its disgusting, hypocritical self-professed mortgage on morals.

      It’s about tone, rather than what is right or wrong per se. And as anyone in a marriage or other relationship knows, the right tone always facilitates a civilised discussion. And I believe the tone is all wrong on the asylum seeker issue at the moment.

      If you made it this far, thanks for reading this diatribe - Ant

    • Kika says:

      10:40am | 14/09/11

      Well done Ant. So many assume that they are all opportunists eager to leave for a better life in a western country, and the easiest way to do that is to rip up the passport and pretend you are an asylum seeker.

      The fact is we hear little about the reality of life in these countries. Unless you have walked in anyone’s shoes, how do you know what their life has been like?

      Everyone should thank their lucky stars they were born in Australia and never have to know what it feels like to be persecuted, or to live in a country which has known war for 50 years, or to be systematically and deliberately discriminated against because of your religion and ethnicity, and to live with all these conditions under a corrupt government which covers up all of this under the blind eye of the west (who only gives a damn if there’s money to be made in those countries).

    • adam says:

      11:04am | 14/09/11

      Ant, how can we assume our normal confrontational possitions if you insist on being reasonable and well reasoned?

    • Huey says:

      11:13am | 14/09/11

      Good on you Ant!

    • Jay Santos says:

      02:18pm | 14/09/11

      “... I believe the tone is all wrong on the asylum seeker issue at the moment….”

      The problem is you are not holding anyone to account for their behaviour, their lies, their political exploitation and their disgraceful opportunism.

      On April 23, 2003, Julia Gillard issued a press statement that said of the Howard Government “Another boat on the way. Another policy failure.”

      She lied about having an agreement with East Timor.

      She lied about having an agreement with Malaysia.

      She lied about doing deals with non-signatories to the UNHCR.

      Forget the people’s ‘humanitarianism’.  Where’s your blow torch on the lies?

      The government continues to lie to its constituents on almost every issue.

      Worse, it lies with cunning deliberation and impunity.

      Putting aside Labor under Gillards willingness to forsake its own political ideology and principles in a desperate ploy to remain in power, how can ANY government in this country be trusted again?

      Expose their hypocrisy and their lies.

    • Josephine says:

      10:33am | 14/09/11

      Just because we like animal stories doesn’t mean we have can’t have feelings for humans as well. Your last sentence implies that animals aren’t worthy of sympathy because they are not human and therefore less worthy of compassion. That we shouldn’t care for them because humans are more important. My question is: Why are humans better than animals? Because we are supposedly more intelligent & can lord it over every other species? Humans aren’t facing extinction but animals are because of human activity.

      As previous commenters have said, refugees choose to travel through & by pass other countries where they could probably live quite comfortably with the money they pay people smugglers.  But once they make a bee line for Australia, they become economic refugees.

    • Jade says:

      10:42am | 14/09/11

      Great article until you had to ruin it by adding in this:

      “when we dehumanise people who make much scarier journeys on leaky boats off Australia’s northern coastline?

      Remember, many of these people are fleeing regimes so evil we’ve committed our own troops to fighting them.

      Seems sometimes our sense of humanity is much more easily stirred by the plight of animals than by actual humans”

      Personally I am more saddened by stories of animals and their plights than I am of humans.  As someone said above, animals are innocent. They are just trying to find their way in a world that us humans have destroyed and continue to destroy though overpopulation and destruction of habitat.

      I don’t think its really right to compare the two… the illegal boaties that make their way here are only after money after all.

    • CJ says:

      11:06am | 14/09/11

      Everyone gets giddy when “Migaloo” the albino whale deigns to swim near a beach, and few will forget “Colin”, the sick baby humpback that broke a million hearts when it swam into Pittwater on a suicide mission a few years back. As soon as a dolphin gets snared in a shark net, it seems the first priority is to christen it “Nungoo” or “Yarla” or some other faux indigenous name before calling in ORCA to save the day. 
      What’s I find interesting is that the ocean’s TRUE headline grabbers - the ones that generate real news stories - are assigned no such pet name, nor are they afforded the caring, sharing animal kingdom kinship reserved for the likes of Happy-effing-Feet. Instead, they’re described in cold, frightening and impersonal terms. There’s no “Mr Jolly” or “Mungalunga” nickname for them. Instead, news readers hiss about the “3m bull shark”, the “adult white pointer” or the “4m tiger shark, a known scavenger.” Why don’t we treat these magnificent, prehistoric creatures with the same fraternal respect as some dumb-arse penguin who couldn’t tell sand from snow even when chewing it? They don’t necessarily need to be cutesy names or mean “fish of many teeth” in the dialect of the Garrigal people: why not just give these genuine aquatic news-makers a standard name? Wouldn’t it be refreshing to pick up the paper and read something like ...
      Extra shark patrols will be carried out at Sydney beaches this weekend after a surfer lost his lower left leg in a shark attack yesterday.
      Bill Bloggs had been surfing at South Maroubra about 7am when he was mauled by Greg Prestwich. Several surfers witnessed the terrifying attack and helped Mr Bloggs ashore, using a leg rope as a tourniquet to stem the blood flow until paramedics arrived.
      “It was a frightening thing to see,” said local surfer Joe Blow, one of the men who went to Mr Blogg’s aid. “[Greg] Prestwich just came out of nowhere. We were sitting there waiting for waves to come in and suddenly, bang - Prestwich knocked Bill off his board and the water instantly started turning red.”
      Shark expert John West from Oceanworld at Manly said Prestwich was most likely either a bull shark or a great white - species that are common along the NSW coast at this time of year.
      The attack on Mr Bloggs comes just six months after Narrabeen teenager Timmy Thompson was savaged by Simon “Chook” Yeomans while swimming at Collaroy. Yeomans, a juvenile bull shark, was later caught and killed by local fishermen. Timmy Thompson’s wristwatch and part of his left hand were recovered from Yeomans’ digestive tract.
      NSW Fisheries Minister Ian Michael said there would be no attempt made to hunt down and kill Greg Prestwich. “Beach goers need to remember that the ocean is the natural habitat for sharks like Greg and Chook. Entering their habitat does come with risks.”
      Rant over.

    • fairsfair says:

      11:26am | 14/09/11

      That is one of the most entertaining things I have ever read. I tip my hat to thee.

    • Kika says:

      11:29am | 14/09/11

      I like it… well said. Don’t know how naming a man eating shark “Bugsy” will go down though. But I can’t see why for the rest of it we can’t name them something nice like “3 Hammerheads off Gold Coast beaches… we’ve named them Bugalugs, Benny and Bruiser”.

    • TJ says:

      11:42am | 14/09/11

      *like* very nice, I don’t understand why there is such outcry when a shark attacks, it’s not like it happened in Coles

    • Kika says:

      02:00pm | 14/09/11

      Once sharks learn to fly then we’re in big trouble… Flying Megalodons. That’s a happy thought.

    • TJ says:

      02:20pm | 14/09/11

      @Kika - that would be something to see

    • CJ says:

      01:54pm | 14/09/11

      The same thing happens when pit bulls maul people. Everyone gets named in the story: the victim, the cop who shoots the dog, the shaken neighbour, the local mayor ... everyone except the dog. It usually gets sidelined as “the three year old male pit bull” or somesuch - despite the fact it generated the story in the first place. Odds are the dog had a cool name, but because it’s savage it doesn’t get named in the press. The only time dangerous animals get a name is when they’re in a cage, and that raises another pet hate of mine: the wanky, ethnocentric cage name. Who could ever forget that cute little baby elephant born at Taronga Zoo last year? It took a while for the premature little fella to walk properly so zoo staff dubbed him Mr Shuffles, which I thought was fair enough. But it later turned out that Mr Shuffles was actually just a temporary name. Because he’s an Asian elephant, the Animal-Namers-In-Chief were adamant he had to have an Asian handle. And so it came to pass that funny little Mr Shuffles became “Pathi Harn”, meaning “miracle” in Thai. There was even an official naming ceremony/media launch, presided over by Frank Sartor. And ohhh didn’t the press lap it up? “Pathi Harn this!” and “Pathi Harn that!” they proclaimed. Anyway, what’s done is done. Fine, have your Pathi Harns and call your caged lions “Jambo” and “Kuchani”, but I reckon Australia missed a golden, historic opportunity to give Mr Shuffles a good old fashioned Aussie name (and let’s not forget the dude was actually born here in Australia). I honestly think it also would’ve given international visitors to the zoo something cool to tell the folks back home. What’s gonna be more memorable for tourists? Taking photos of a Sydney-born-and-raised elephant named Pathi Harn, or one who answers to Rhys “Tooves” Toovey? Pathi Harn or Gary McAlister? Pathi Harn or Ben “Robbo” Roberts? I know what I’d have gone with, but what’s done can’t be undone now ...

    • dw says:

      02:05pm | 14/09/11

      It’s odd we never hear much about Fukushima these days. It seemed very important at the time.

    • Fiddler says:

      02:57pm | 14/09/11

      not odd, just confirms it was a non-event. If we heard about it in the press a lot of the hysteria over nuclear power would die off.

    • iansand says:

      03:46pm | 14/09/11

      If you think that an exclusion zone of several kilometres counts as a non-event…..

      Journalists have the attention span of a goldfish with ADD.  Just because they have lost interest does not mean that nothing is happening.

    • Semi Concerned Citizen says:

      04:45pm | 14/09/11

      Dw,

      It’s not exploding , just sitting quietly radiating calmly. The media has no interest in a slow cooked meal its all about stir fries and minute steak these days.

    • Millie says:

      04:02pm | 14/09/11

      The boat people pay a huge amount of money to come to Australia and jump the queue.The people bringing them are not doing it out of kindness but to profit.Some boat people may be the type of people who would never be admitted to this country because they are criminals and some may be honest and law abiding but when they get here,they set fire to where they live,the destroy the things they are given,they get fed and housed for free,they have many extras that people who live here honestly don’t have.I wouldn’t mind someone taking care of me as well as the boat people are taken care of and they are contained until they can be cleared to be admitted or sent back because they are dubious.No one forces them here.The animals that are hurt and cared for have no choice.They are victims of what ever has happened to them.The boat people have a choice and we don’t know if they are victims or not.I know who I would help.

    • Left Turn Only says:

      04:20pm | 14/09/11

      Happy Feet ate sand instead of snow. He tasted junk food first hand!He got sick
      In real life, The Penguin used to send junkmail to Batman ! It made the Caped Crusader sick.

    • dont trust the puffins says:

      06:51pm | 14/09/11

      The moment penguins start paying other organize crime penguins
      large sums of money for a spot on a charter boat into Australian waters,
      destroy any “proof” that they are in fact penguin and not a militant puffin
      disguising its identity, Then demand their processing be speed up by burning or destroying the accommodation supplied . Then and only then will people have less compassion for them.

    • Annie says:

      07:37pm | 14/09/11

      A very thoughtful Article Anthony, touching on reality, Truth and compassion, so are others just a commodity to meet our needs, do we care about those less fortunate then us or do we do less for them,  then we do for our animals.

      Shortly before the breakout of World War II, doors throughout world began closing to Jewish refugees—leaving the Shanghai as the only place where they could enter without a visa, many went there, others has a choice to either go back to Concentration camps which often meant death or to starve to death in the boats out at sea is History repeating itself.

      Come on Aussies,  put yourself in their shoes, have a heart lend a hand, you have shown you cared before do it again.

    • right turn only says:

      08:00pm | 14/09/11

      maneating barflies are more dangerous to mankind and more numerous than manotees!

    • RED says:

      08:35am | 15/09/11

      Think about it, do you get more sad when watching a movie when a person dies or when the dog dies? #marleyandme

    • TJ says:

      09:12am | 15/09/11

      Oh goodie, another human crying out about how we don’t value other humans more… and value animals, the environment… or anything else, less. Give me a break!

    • Annie says:

      06:57pm | 16/09/11

      One day TJ you might need a break,  I hope someone has a big enough heart to give it to you,  if not and there is no one left that has compassion,  then you will be just another human crying out about how nobody values other humans.

      And those that do care now,  may not get earthly praise and recognition but their rewards will be out of this world in more ways then one.

    • Annie says:

      07:18pm | 16/09/11

      Red think about this for a moment,  it might help you get things into their proper perspective. -  Your dying and those who you consider close to you pop into to see you and the conversation goes something like this -  Sorry Red we can’t stay too long, we must hurry down to the animal hospital and be with our dearly beloved Shaggy,  it’s so very very sad, he is dying, how are we ever going to be able to go on without him. What did you say Red,  your dying too, yes we know dear but how can that be compared to our faithful Shaggy dying, there is just no comparison,  you must realise that don’t you? if not why not?

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@AndrewCatsaras Agreed. Kills more people than AIDS. Yet tolerated. Meanwhile: Good Insiders piece again Andrew.

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @JamieTravers: I'm in Europe and don't care for Eurovision, why is my twitter feed filled with Aussies recounting the bloody thing!?

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter