This poster depicting Barack Obama as the Dark Knight Joker is currently causing a stir in America and the rest of the world.

The Obama Joker Socialism poster: why are people so fascinated?

Debate on the subject has been raging online and in papers on what the poster means, from those claiming it shows a backlash against Barack Obama to arguments that it is a popularised racist attack on the President.

But perhaps what is most interesting about the poster is that we’re even surprised that people are now openly mocking the American President. The debate itself is probably an indication of how incredibly popular Obama still is.

For those of you who haven’t seen or heard about the Obama Joker Socialism poster it anonymously emerged as early as April around Los Angeles freeway walls, but it has only been popularised in recent weeks. It is now reportedly showing up in other cities.

According to The Daily Mail the poster collapsed the first internet site that displayed it and is one of google’s top hot topics.

America’s Fox News Channel has publicised the poster with some right wing commentators pointing to it as beginning of a mainstream backlash against the President.

“It is starting,” says Thomas Lindfun the editor of conservative website American Thinker told The Times.

“Open mockery of Barack Obama, as disillusionment sets in with the man, his policies, and the phony image of a race-healing, brilliant, scholarly middle-of-the-roader.”

Others have justifiably pointed out that there was an entire industry of posters and t-shirts calling George W. Bush just about everything under the sun. Ditto Sarah Palin who was out and about for 30 seconds before it started.
Some Obama diehards have made rather ham-fisted attempts to denounce the poster with Earl Ofari Hutchinson, president of the Los Angeles Urban Policy Roundtable, quoted in The Times as characterising the poster as “dangerous”.

“Depicting the president as demonic and a socialist goes beyond political spoofery.

“It is mean-spirited and dangerous.

“We have issued a public challenge to the person or group that put up the poster to come forth and publicly tell why they have used this offensive depiction to ridicule President Obama.”

Of course to the call the poster dangerous is ridiculous, it’s a plain expression of democratic freedom. In a democracy people are free to dress up Barack Obama as a bee and call him a de’Medeci apologist if they so wish.

Furthermore, this argument plays perfectly into the hands of Republican critics that Democrats can’t take what they have been dishing out for years. Ofari has since watered down his comments on the Huffington Post.
Phillip Kennicott of The Washington Post devoted his entire column to the poster today. He concluded that as the imagery of Obama as the Joker did not make sense it was actually racist:

“Obama, like the Joker and like the racial stereotype of the black man, carries within him an unknowable, volatile and dangerous marker of urban violence, which could erupt at any time. The charge of socialism is secondary to the basic message that Obama can’t be trusted, not because he is a politician, but because he’s black.”

But whether Obama can be called a socialist or the poster is racist kind of misses the broader point here: why has a funky looking protest poster against Barack Obama on an LA underpass fascinated so many? 

The poster uses the same techniques of tapping into popular culture that Obama has used to his advantage against him, which does make it a particulaly interesting and pin -pointed attack.

Obama’s popularity ratings have dropped from messiah level to mere prophet status, but one could hardly argue that the appearance of a poster or two is evidence he’s on the way out.

Rather than being an indicator of an Obama backlash, it’s probably more of a sign of his on-going popularity that America and world think it so novel that some people - wait for it - don’t much like Barack Obama.

Most commented

26 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Dick says:

      05:58pm | 06/08/09

      Nice beedogs link there, Leo.

      The thing about this poster for me is that, conceptually, it’s an utter failure - unless I’m just not getting the joke? I mean, Obama looks pretty awesome as the Joker, and a lot of dumb yanks who should know better are accusing him of being a socialist - but what’s the link between those two things? I thought the Joker was more of a sociopathic bank robber than a left-wing fan of universal health care?

      I mean, when the anti-Obama crowd can’t even match the “Good Bush, Bad Bush” or “Buck Fush” t-shirts for wit, you’ve got to wonder how smart they are.

      http://dullsvillain.wordpress.com

    • Eric says:

      06:08pm | 06/08/09

      The Obama/Joker poster is highly effective—otherwise, nobody would be discussing it.

      It speaks on several levels. Obama’s narcissism and borderline psychopathology, his complete untrustworthiness, and his real agenda of socialism are just three of those.

      The image resonates, and that’s why Obama’s supporters hate it.

    • allrise says:

      07:21pm | 06/08/09

      What do you think of the new Obama poster? Well… the people took it to court, and you can be the judge http://bit.ly/obama01

    • Paul. says:

      08:02pm | 06/08/09

      To the political correctness promoting die hard Obama supporters.

      Why so serious?

    • Jonathan says:

      08:17pm | 06/08/09

      I don’t get it.

      Also, what’s wrong with socialism?  The US already has socialised education, law enforcement, military, libraries, and the list goes on.  Why not throw a bit of healthcare in there for good measure?

    • Jasper says:

      08:43pm | 06/08/09

      Eric, based on the content of your post, I think you know absolutely nothing about psychology or socialism. What exactly is his “borderline psychopathology”? he seems more-or-less just like every other politician out there - hardly pure as the driven snow but no psychopath either.

      And as for socialism, do you even know what the policy platform of socialism is, or are you using it in the American sense, where anything remotely related to giving the working poor a fair go is seen as socialism?

      Ever since Keynes anyone who wants to use the financial power of the state to stop capitalism from falling over from the short-sighted stupidity of the various corporate leaders, has been accused of being a socialist. I seem to remember that Roosevelt copped the same criticism for his New Deal policies.

      A socialist who used the financial power of the state to prop up the banks rather than nationalising the “means of production” (THAT is a real communist/socialist policy) is a very poor socialist indeed.

    • jim says:

      09:22pm | 06/08/09

      It’s just a mishmash of two contradictory, iconic images from the last year or so. A very un-big deal. People are dumbing down so much that all of their controversial mind-fill now comes from arresting images, videos on u-tube and shock-jock sound grabs.

    • Julie Coker-Godson says:

      10:03pm | 06/08/09

      Well said Jasper.  My point is very plain and simple:  its awful, ugly and downright disrespectful, IMHO.  That’s it!

    • Venise says:

      10:56pm | 06/08/09

      Unfortunately this is ART. It’s creative, striking, controversial, tasteless; whatever adjective anyone wishes to throw at it, nevertheless it is legitimate Art. And as art people are entitled to read into it anything they wish. Therefore the adjective tends to illuminate the commenter, rather than the subject matter being illuminated. As imagery it is stunning, for the good or the bad, it has to be decided by the individual.
      The real problem about this kind of image is that the viewer seldom looks at it with unadulterated eyes. By the time he or she, get to it there will have been phone calls, emails, carrier pigeons, whatever, and the viewer has an opinioin before they see the image.
      On a superficial level-and most comments tend to be superficial-there is of course, the striking imagery which the late Heath Ledger made so famous. In the majority of cases it is this image everyone remembers from seeing that final movie of that great actor.

    • Razor says:

      11:47pm | 06/08/09

      Oooooh Julie - disrespectful.

      Here is guy who, having said he would be bound by public campaign funding limits, did an about face and ended up spending over $1 billion to get elected.

      He promised not to raise taxes and now top officials are saying taxes need to rise.  How many of his appoitntees and potential appointees suddenly discover tax problems.  He is ramming legislation through that the politicians aren’t even reading.  The guy is a joke.

    • Karly says:

      12:17am | 07/08/09

      Don’t you guys see this was made to be questioned… to make you think and question preconceived thoughts and ideas

    • Chase Stevens says:

      12:17am | 07/08/09

      Honestly I think they could have done a better job with it.

    • Dan says:

      02:41am | 07/08/09

      Eric, which of Obama’s supporters hate it? Why would we? The image says nothing whatsoever.

    • DeviantDefiantMann says:

      04:53am | 07/08/09

      The picture is just a misdirection. The image you should be looking at is the word “Socialism”. Bilderberg put up that picture to distract us from the One-World, One-Government shit they have planned.

    • Zeta says:

      08:32am | 07/08/09

      How is this any different from the constant anti-Bush propaganda that artists, predominantly left wing artisits, indulged in for the last 8 years? Even here in Sydney, it seemed like you couldn’t lurk in any dark alley way without spotting some anti-Bush poster surreptiously stuck to the wall by some Socialist activist. And I should know. I lurk in a lot of dark alley ways.

    • RT says:

      09:27am | 07/08/09

      I wouldn’t place importance on any anti-Obama propaganda coming from the United States. There is even a group there dedicated to establishing that Obama was born in Kenya and his presidency therefore is illegitimate, using forged documents.
      It’s ironic in that after decades of near laissez-faire capitalism in the US, the last months of the Bush administration saw the socialisation of failing American corporations, yet it’s Obama that’s accused of socialism. Go figure, as the yanks say. In the end this sort of stuff washes over without much effect.

    • LOL says:

      09:33am | 07/08/09

      Perhaps instead of socialism (which, despite its ardent admirers, is, as history shows, the most ineffective form of government), it should’ve read: “Somewhere in Kenya a village is missing an idiot.” Now that would be funny.

    • Fry says:

      10:01am | 07/08/09

      I love that this poster can create so much controversy and unrest because someone dared to make an artistic statement against the US President, yet a nuff-nuff media commentator in the US calls our PM a ‘serial killer’ and that is somehow ok? I shudder to think what ‘air strikes’ Australia would be bombarded with if we dared to say such things about the US’s idolised top political figure.

    • LM says:

      10:18am | 07/08/09

      LOL - your comments are truly disturbing. It saddens me that you may be tax paying Australian citizen with the right to vote.

      As history shows, the fear, loathing and perceived threat of socialism is completely ineffective and a waste of time for example the Vietnam War, the McCarthy era etc. 
       
      Sadly, most Americans are uneducated and aware of how so many of their policies contradict their apparent deep rooted love of Capitalism otherwise they wouldn’t allow corporations to be bailed out by government and the would question why the American goverment has placed santions on trade with other countries?

    • Ben says:

      11:03am | 07/08/09

      I think the fuss about this image is mainly a two issues - one very much North American and the other increasingly reasonating in western socitety.

      Firstly, the majority of white people in the US simply don’t know how to deal with the issue of members black, hispanic and asian communities as mainstream society. The idea of interracial dating etc is still rare, never mind that all of a sudden the Commander in Chief sending those white boys with the buzz cuts into battle is black. In Australia (despite some undoubted racist tendencies that rarely surfaces and excluding the disgraceful but very complex issue of our indigenous population) this is no issue - there are people from different backgrounds getting together all over the place here. We don’t even think about it which is the best thing of all.

      The black social elite even have that White Party in the waspy Hamptons to highlight the issue.

      Secondly, the poster resonates because of people’s growing obsession with authenticity. People want things to be real not fake, not distorted, not come up with only to sell things. For society’s sake lets hope this wasn’t come up with a fashion industry wunderkind who goes on to make a squillion from t-shirt sales.

    • james says:

      11:20am | 07/08/09

      Actually, Eric, I hate this poster because I saw the film. It filled me with an overwhelming sense of disturbance and an irrational fear for a fictional character. The Joker undertook every psychopathic disorder and forged a new level of it.

      President Obama is a great man who has come from great circumstances. The promise held in his term is a relief to the U.S. and to the rest of the world. Behaviour like this undermines his dedication to his nation.

      This image is completely disrespectful and the association of the terrifying Joker with your President (who comes bearing hope) is a completely destructive joke and serves no purpose other than to cause havoc and incite malice among the people.

      The difference between this stunt and previous political ‘art’ is that the U.S. finally have a leader worth supporting and worth paying allegiance to, and yet her citizens pervert their freedoms by slandering those who uphold it for them. Shame.

    • Dick says:

      12:38pm | 07/08/09

      Ben, your assertions about racial integration in the US versus Australia are ludicrous. You say that “white people in the US simply don’t know how to deal with the issue of ... black… communities as mainstream society”. Um… so why elect an African American man to the top office?

      Your claim that Australia is more racially tolerant than the US because we have more “interracial dating” is bizzare and unlikely. Our demographics are way less diverse - 90%+ of Australia is “white”, versus about 75% of the US (see Wikipedia). When I lived in America, I heard less racist jokes and saw more diversity in workplaces and communities than in Australia.

      And can you imagine Australia electing a person of Asian or Aboriginal descent to the top office?

      You don’t need to clutch at straws like this if you want to bash America, mate. There’s plenty of other, legitimate reasons to do so.

      http://dullsvillain.wordpress.com

    • LOL says:

      12:56pm | 07/08/09

      Ah LM, obviously you’re one of the ardent admirers I referred to. Don’t worry they have special schools for people like you. And while you’re at it, perhaps they can teach you how to read. Your comments bear no relation to what I said re Socialism. Mentioning McCarthyism and Vietnam is, in this respect, an apropos of nothing. Socialism has proved throughout history to be the most ineffective form of government (as I said): See the collapse of the Soviet Union, Nazism, the debacles that are Cuba, North Korea, North Vietnam and the Whitlam government. Socialism does nothing but provide more to those who don’t deserve and less to those who do.

      And with respect to the socialist policies that infiltrate American society, I have to say that bailing out corporations and limiting trade are possibly the most economically irresponsible policies in history. Let the bad wood rot, as it should.

      And by the way, it saddens me that the hundreds of thousands of dollars I pay in tax each year is being spent in ways that produce morons like you.

    • Michael says:

      09:22pm | 07/08/09

      I really don’t see how making obama look like the joker is such a big deal, now if you painted McCains face black you’d be courting trouble, a great uncle of mine made the mistake of impersonating a black man for humour and it backfired on him in a rather epic fashion, hehe in hindsight he probably should have left out the noose.

    • Ben says:

      12:29am | 08/08/09

      Dick
      I don’t want to bash America.
      There will be many books written about why Americans elected Obama, few will find it was a wholehearted endorsement by white America of black America and its politicians.
      My point about interracial dating is that it an indication of a society’s perception of racial barriers or separateness. Most people who have visited the US in addition to myself would concede that while white/black and black/hispanic dating is on the increase it is still very noticable how rare it is. Australians don’t give it a second thought, which while we might be less diverse doesn’t mean we are less tolerant.
      As for an asian or aboriginal pm - your right but we have Gillard who is the surprise packet of the century in government and will our first woman PM.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

@Bogans_Heroes @1fatbogan Ha! So Adelaide, so creepy. Gilles St, then Unley, then Pembroke.

Paul Colgan

@joekiely just beat the crus. No sweat eh?

Paul Colgan

@bolgo101 Stick ROG in front of the posts and you still have white knuckles

Paul Colgan

@joekiely how far out was he?

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter