In August 2007, Barack Obama promised that if he were elected president he would ‘travel to a major Islamic forum and deliver an address to redefine our struggle.’

His impressive speech in Cairo yesterday fulfilled that promise.

Obama is the finest orator in a generation. His national political career was kicked off by a single speech: his keynote address to the Democratic National Convention in Boston in 2004.

His remarkable candidacy for president was propelled by his oratory – and sustained by it. At the lowest point in his campaign, when he was confronted by the toxic issue of race, Obama did not buy ad time or schedule a TV interview: he rented a hall in Philadelphia and wrote some remarks.

All of Obama’s skill as a speechwriter and speechmaker was on display for those guests seated in Cairo University’s Great Hall – and for the rest of us monitoring the speech on the Internet, SMS and Twitter. The structure of the talk was clear and straightforward. The language was simple and elegant rather than highfalutin, which befitted a speech addressed to multiple and diverse audiences.

Given that his remarks were directed mainly to Muslims, Obama was appropriately respectful of their religion. He quoted the Koran knowledgeably and dropped in Arabic greetings and sayings.

He spoke fondly of his personal links to Islam – in particular his childhood in Indonesia, which is home to the world’s largest Muslim population – and enumerated the gifts of learning and music that Islam has given to civilization.

The theme of the speech – that the communities of the Middle East need to understand their opponents’ viewpoints – was hardly novel. But it was reinforced by the balance with which Obama addressed the issues.

He acknowledged, for instance, that Americans sometimes hold negative stereotypes of Muslims, but warned that Muslims also have to update their views of America. He recognised Washington’s involvement in the 1953 coup in Iran but also reminded his listeners of Tehran’s acts of violence and hostage-taking against US citizens.

Obama’s section on the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians was very finely calibrated.

Israelis will welcome his clarity on the ‘unbreakable’ bond between the US and Israel, which he characterised as the ‘Jewish homeland’; his condemnation of ‘vile’ anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial; and his warning that Palestinians must abandon violence and recognise Israel.

Palestinians will welcome his recognition that their situation is ‘intolerable’ and the strength of his statement that Washington ‘does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements’.

This speech puts Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a real bind, caught between members of his own government who support continued settlement growth and an Israeli public which puts enormous weight on rock-solid relations with the United States.

Obama concluded that the two-state solution ‘is in Israel’s interest, Palestine’s interest, America’s interest, and the world’s interest. And that is why I intend to personally pursue this outcome with all the patience and dedication that the task requires.’

Obama’s speech was lent emotional weight by the speaker’s own biography. In its optimism, though, this was a quintessentially American argument. Even Obama’s final line was a homage to his predecessor John Kennedy, who ended his inaugural address by calling on his audience to ‘go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.’

Cynics will say that you cannot fight terrorism with cue cards. That is surely true, and all the hard policy work is still to be done. But a speech can open people’s minds.

The president’s words seem to have been well-received by Muslims – and not only those in the hall chanting ‘Obama! Obama!’ An Egyptian friend of mine, the scholar and journalist Khalil al-Anani, made this comment: ‘Today might be the 12th of September, 2001, because I think he closed that chapter of 9/11 and called for a new chapter in U.S. relations with the Muslim world.’

Not every Muslim listener was so positive, of course – many were unimpressed and some were positively contemptuous. But perhaps the best indication of Obama’s success is the anger of his opponents: the attempted pre-emptive rebuttal by Al-Qaeda and the screeching from Tehran and Hezbollah. If the extremists are this worried, then the Cairo address may turn out to be one of Barack Obama’s most consequential speeches.

Most commented

14 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Daniel says:

      09:04pm | 05/06/09

      I didn’t hear the speech except for some small snips, but apparently it went down very well with the Egyptians. Obama is proving he can really put some good lines & speeches together, time will tell if he actually does something and just doesn’t talk about things.

    • watty says:

      11:38pm | 05/06/09

      “Closed that chapter of 9/11 and called fpr a new chapter”

      “Puts Israel in a bind”

      “Cannot fight terrorism with cue cards (or teleprompters)”

      Pleads for Iran to have nuclear power but rejects to it’s growth in America.

      As a spin doctor and egomaniac Obama makes our own Prime Minoister sound like a C-grader..

    • Eric says:

      09:52am | 06/06/09

      Like all Obama’s speeches, the words are fine but ultimately meaningless.

      Nobody with any sense believes a word that charlatan says. Some radical Muslims, though, will view Obama’s crawling as a sign of weakness and an incentive to attack.

    • Michael says:

      11:21am | 06/06/09

      To bring about real, sustainable change in this world, we must start somewhere.  The President’s speech in Cairo marks in someway that the starter’s gun has been fired; not that we are in a race against each other.  The time has come to let go of staunch realist thinking that we live in an Hobbesian world where war is inevitable.

      Peace is the holy grail for mankind.  Immanuel Kant wrote his thesis entitled “Perpetual Peace” nearly 300 years ago.  The world has seen two of the bloodiest wars in history in recent memory.  While fighting between states has lessened, internal wars has increased, most notably in the undeveloped nations of Africa; notwithstanding the dreadful ethnic cleansings that occurred in the former Yugoslavian republic.

      Now we have relgious extremists wishing to pursue their own interests through violence.  Parties that don’t belong to any state and yet clearly threaten our desire for a peaceful world.

      The unipolar world is coming to an end.  Richard Haas posits that we are moving into a non-polar world.  America has shown that military strength is insufficient to resolve critical issues.  No one state in this world has the power to resolve the world’s issues.  We clearly need to work together.

      Obama’s speech, I believe, marks the starting point for a collaborative effort to address critical issues across our world.  Climate change is focussed on ‘saving’ our planet and living sustainably.  We also need to ‘save’ mankind, if you will.  We need to further our liberal thinking. 

      To pinch a line from Kevin Rudd; “we are all in this together”.  We collectively need to take responsibility to achieve a safe and peaceful world.  Can we achieve this.  As Obama said many times during his election campaign, “Yes, we can”.

      Well done, Mr President.  Now for the action plan.

    • Arnold Layne says:

      12:38pm | 06/06/09

      What a difference a year makes.  Would President Bush have even countenanced going to Egypt, let alone delivering a speech like that?  As President Obama said, he can’t fix everything with one speech, but he seems to be making a genuine effort to broker peace by treating Muslims with dignity, respect and understanding.

    • Nick says:

      01:35pm | 06/06/09

      Attack what, Eric?

    • iansand says:

      01:54pm | 06/06/09

      It will be a truly great speech if he can achieve the aims he has set out.  If not, it will just be another bit of flim flam.  The speech is one thing (and an easy thing), but carrying the people of the US and Middle East with him will be the challenge.

      Still - the fact that he has made the speech is a start.

    • T.C. says:

      03:03pm | 06/06/09

      @Eric, some radical Muslims also take strong words as an overt threat and make it into an incentive to attack.

      Lets face it, radical anyones and anybodies will take anything and use it as an excuse to do whatever they wanted to do in the first place.

    • T.C. says:

      03:08pm | 06/06/09

      No doubt the anti-Obama Brigade will dissect and twist every sentence, word and punctuation mark the President used. One would think that being a brilliant orator is something to be ashamed of.

      I don’t see why anyone would knock such a gifted orator and yearn for the days of the bumbling idiot who took spoonerisms to new heights and political intellect to all-time lows.

    • David says:

      06:25pm | 06/06/09

      Oh dear. Does Fullilove really believe that? How do you say “naive”.

    • Ross says:

      10:20am | 07/06/09

      I sincerely hope that Obamas speech starts mature dialogue between the west and Islam.  Respect has to grow from both sides of the fence for it to flourish, only time will tell.

    • Eric says:

      10:26am | 07/06/09

      Fanatics see a naive weakling at the head of the United States, and hence will move to attack the US and its allies.

      As to the “Great Orator”—without a teleprompter he is worse than Bush. Furthermore, he means nothing he says—all his words are expendable.

    • Mortie says:

      06:32pm | 07/06/09

      ‘Great orator’ in English. The problem is when it gets translated into Arabic. We in the west are listening to a different speech.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

David Penberthy

@KevCorduroy @SallyHitchiner it's a great idea I doubt he'd go for it though far too laid back

ToryShepherd

. @mcguiremi is journo of the year! #samediaawards

ToryShepherd

.@mariamosco @msmarto Super Smarto. And Shirley Stott Despoja into the Hall of Fame #samediaawards

ToryShepherd

Best print journo to @mcguiremi woot! #samediaawards

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter