As Australia readies itself for a fresh debate about the legalisation of voluntary euthanasia, Dr Philip Nitschke is busy spreading his morbid gospel throughout Canada, where dozens of oldies are dying to attend his right-to-die seminars.

Would you be seen dead in this shirt? Photo: Press Association

Most of them are not literally dying, no more so than the rest of us are in that daily incremental way. They’re a bit closer to their use-by-date, but they are generally hale and hearty. They have just decided that, when their time is almost at hand, they would like to go in a manner of their choosing and with dignity.

It’s a valid and widely-held human want. One pretty strong word of caution for these Canadian folks is that if it’s dignity they want, they should see another doctor.

The news report on Canada’s nationalpost.com of Nitschke’s visit this week began as follows:

“In the basement of Paul and Deltry Zollmann’s Ottawa home is the helium canister the elderly couple purchased from a party store a few years ago. The gas, they explain, is not leftover from a fete nor is it in anticipation of any usual kind of celebration: It is stowed downstairs in case one or both choose to someday end their life.”

It’s not explained in the piece how helium can end your life – perhaps your voice becomes so hilariously high-pitched that you die laughing – but for Dr Nitschke the helium canister represents the latest addition to his arsenal of zany life-ending devices, with which I’ve developed something of an obsession.

The most recent photograph I had seen of Dr Nitschke featured him posing next to an lpg bottle for a gas barbecue, with that trademark hangdog expression on his face, looking like a cross between the Grim Reaper and the guy from the Rays Outdoors commercial.

His other inventions include “the exit bag” – his term – which is a suffocating device which, with the simple addition of a Glad-style zip-lock mechanism, means you could probably leave gran in the driveway on bin night. He also invented the laptop of death – not his term - where with three taps of the space bar you can send yourself off to the hereafter with the administering of life-ending toxins into your bloodstream.

Setting aside his cartoonish Heath W Robinson stylings, the deeply zealous Nitschke seems professionally determined to ignore a couple of things. The first is that other members of his profession already know how to hasten or end a terminally ill person’s life without any of these morbid theatrics, and do so every day.  The second is that there are many people in the community who want that process to become easier, even to be protected by law, but are left cold by Nitschke’s renegade approach.

In the mid-90s, Nitschke became the very public frontman in the campaign to let the Northern Territory’s euthanasia laws stand. When the Howard Government overrode that legislation, Nitschke burnt the bill outside the Senate entrance of Federal Parliament. It was about 3am and a bunch of us were covering it at the time. I remember Liberal Senator and stirrer Bill Heffernan walking past Nitschke at the time and shouting “Bad luck!” derisively as he went to find his Commcar.

If Nitschke is out of step with the Australian mainstream, so too are the likes of Heffernan who have an absolutist position that human life is sacrosanct, and that government should never create a power for doctors to up-end their Hippocratic Oath by ending lives instead of saving them.

The manner in which this debate has re-emerged is certainly left-field. There was no public debate during the election campaign. It has come about purely as a result of Labor’s formal alliance with the Greens, and the determination of Senator Bob Brown, a past defender of Nitschke, to place it on the national agenda.

Whatever its origins, there is string evidence that the public is overwhelmingly happy about that. A national survey by Auspoll last month found a massive 76 per cent of Australians supported voluntary euthanasia. As Auspoll CEO Ross Neilson wrote on The Punch, it’s hard to get that level of voter support for a tax cut.

If the euthanasia movement is to succeed it must this time distance itself from Nitschke and his ilk and find a much more moderate and mature figure to spearhead the debate. The likes of Heffernan, who just want the issue to go away, should be encouraging him back from Canada as soon as possible.

Most commented

27 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • T.Chong says:

      06:35am | 16/10/10

      Lightly gloss over the issue, but play the man.
      As you note Dave, overwhelming support, so , instead of focussing on that,
      its all about Dr Phil.
      You mightnt like his style, but that shouldnt overshadow the issue.
      Surely this article isnt about style over substance, is it ?

    • Just Sayin' says:

      03:53pm | 16/10/10

      I agree with you T Chong, but Penberthy has form here.  A couple of weeks ago he wrote the “Boo atheists, but yayatheism” piece, or whatever it was called.  Methinks he just doesn’t like it when someone else feels something more strongly than he does.

    • acotrel says:

      01:45pm | 17/10/10

      The euthanasia debate bores me to death!

    • Delphic Oracle says:

      07:13am | 16/10/10

      My life, my death, my funeral.

    • Wayne Fehlhaber says:

      10:11am | 16/10/10

      Delphic Oracle :
      Your family , their grief , your mess

    • Steve Smith says:

      04:20pm | 16/10/10

      Wayne, don’t confuse suicide with Euthanasia

    • cok-on-the-hill says:

      07:55am | 16/10/10

      Most of us are dying decrementally, not ‘incrementally’; but, be that as it may, I would rather be fully compos mentis and have the physical capability to be able to pull my own pin to avoid any further ‘increment’ in the suffering towards my ultimate demise.

    • Lady Fong says:

      08:31am | 16/10/10

      For once DP, I disagree w/ you very strongly. I attend Exit International meetings and what you call nutty and morbid are the result of reaction to state and federal govt policy. If euthanasia were legalized, then no one would have to resort to helium balloon packets, home made plastic bags etc. These measures were forced on people who, in great pain, distress, and extreme difficulty, want to end it all. If voluntary euthanasia were available then a small dose of nembutal would end life before you could finish taking it. Nembutal is legal for use in Australia by all vets.
          You say that the people who attend his lectures are hale and hearty. When do you want people to attend…when they are so ill they can’t move, have to be hoisted by a motorized device large as a mini-crane to use the toilet? It is when one is healthy and hale and still has one’s wits about her that she can make clear, precise and legal decisions in order that her heirs and successors are not accused of doing away with their elderly parents to acquire an early inheritance [this excuse is touted by ‘pro-life’ at any cost adherents]. It is when one is compos mentis that such a serious decision should be made. In any case, even a living will does not allow one to request death. Surely, if we have such strict rules for riding a bicycle we can devise iron-clad rules to govern a request for voluntary death. Are you playing devil’s advocate perchance?

    • GGibson says:

      08:39am | 16/10/10

      He is only in euthanasia for his name and reputation. Like many people he needed a vehicle for his pride and one day he saw it. He is just a common scoundrel.

    • stephen says:

      04:32pm | 16/10/10

      I agree with you there. I have seen and heard Dr. Nitschke a number of times on television, and under interrogation, if you like, has not given one reasonable and convincing answer to this question :
      why do you do it, and take so much vitriol from the public and authorities ?
      He says he is disheartened about suffering. I don’t believe him.
      He certainly is a doer (and for that alone, he does deserve a little respect), but i suspect his motives.

    • Chris Hartley says:

      04:43pm | 17/10/10

      What a load of garbage GGibson.  Obviously you haven’t had a close relative die an excrutiatingly painful death and asking you to help him die any way you can.  If I could have contacted Dr Nitschke and asked for his help without getting arrested, I would have taken no other option.  As it was I had to watch my dear uncle suffer abominably for five weeks until the cancer finally took him. The wretched holier- than- thou Liberals and Righttolifers took away his right to die with dignity.

    • John C says:

      09:00am | 16/10/10

      I have a lot of problems with this guy and many other fanatical proponents of euthanasia.

      I think it is valid for somebody with medical or ageing problems to be passionate about the subject, and equally for their family members and friends to be passionate, but when I see people from neither of these groups getting frothy about it, I feel a little uneasy. What barrow are they pushing?

    • Heléna says:

      11:33am | 16/10/10

      maybe compassion for people who are terminally ill and no longer want to suffer or people who want to ensure that they retain some dignity when they are no longer able to speak for themselves

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      12:21pm | 16/10/10

      Perhaps their own right to self termination?

    • Gregg says:

      11:51am | 16/10/10

      I do not know that many people will agree with you David on the Nutty Nitschke tag no more than we may feel someone is Nuts for attempting to take on the establishment.

      Would we have had the on and off and on again focus on Euthanasia without him?
      There will be many it would seem that will also agree with the concept of:
      ” Most of them are not literally dying, no more so than the rest of us are in that daily incremental way. They’re a bit closer to their use-by-date, but they are generally hale and hearty. They have just decided that, when their time is almost at hand, they would like to go in a manner of their choosing and with dignity. “

      It’s a valid and widely-held human want. One pretty strong word of caution…........and coupling your caution with description of various means!, and has the doctor stated this is what I propose you do or are these some of the means that people have to resort to because legislation denies them otherwise.

      And whilst it is known that doctors will know how to bring about an end of a life quicker, is it without a drawn out treatment and then will they do so without fear of prosecution and will all be so compliant with a patients or relatives request?

      And so with ” with that trademark hangdog expression on his face, looking like a cross between the Grim Reaper ” you ridicule him all you like DP but then have you ever been driven for a cause of such a significant weighty issue.
      Many of those that Doctor Nitschke has been associated with may have been at death’s door to the extent that he has been surrounded by death and dying in circumstances undesired and so do you not think that might be something of a drain on any person?

      You claim you have developed something of an obsession with this David and it certainly shows through with this piece of your work and many phrases;
      ” Setting aside his cartoonish Heath W Robinson stylings ” being one and is it not you attempting to portray the man as sinister and a nutter? and
      ” If the euthanasia movement is to succeed it must this time distance itself from Nitschke and his ilk and find a much more moderate and mature figure to spearhead the debate. ” is again your judgement call for regardless of how some people may consider him the Doctor is like that green label of Tasmania that has seen us get A greater green government.

    • Austin 3:16 says:

      01:13pm | 16/10/10

      “No cause is so noble that it won’t attract fuggheads.”
      Larry Niven

    • Not convinced says:

      01:38pm | 16/10/10

      Although you state that members of the medical profession are more than capable of hastening death with dignity and without all the do it yourself gadgetry, there are codes of practice that choose suffering for terminal patients.  Whilst I am aware of cancer patients who have been permitted to rely on morphine, for example, for pain relief until the doses reach the stage of inducing death, I know of one recent death of a cancer patient (pancreatic) who consented to a final futile surgical intervention attempt and was subsequently denied pain relief as she was in a surgical recovery ward.  This resulted in hours of agony for the patient and suffering by her family and friends at her side.  The debate on euthanasia must consider actual medical practice rather than assume that palliative care is the norm.

    • Ros says:

      01:48pm | 16/10/10

      As far as arguments go, David, your’s is nutty.  Your ‘argument’ kookily gives more weight to the pro death choice that the opposite. For those suffering agonisingly slow painful deaths with the loss of mind and body, your flippant treatment of the issues involved is cold and I have no idea how it advances your stance.  I hope neither you nor anyone you love is in a situation where you have a degenerative terminal condition. You won’t find it nutty or amusing.

    • Rob says:

      02:27pm | 16/10/10

      I think people like Nitschke are necessary to bring awareness of the issue to the forefront of the public mind. The amount of work he has done to amass and coordinate public support for euthanasia in Australia and internationally is second to none.

    • Bruce says:

      09:53pm | 16/10/10

      Rob: Agree. Nitschke has had the courage to continually keep forcing the euthansaia debate, not like our COWARDLY POLITICIANS who have found it, until recently, an untouchable subject.

    • Sam says:

      04:30pm | 16/10/10

      When you write “The deeply zealous Nitschke seems professionally determined to ignore a couple of things. The first is that other members of his profession already know how to hasten or end a terminally ill person’s life without any of these morbid theatrics, and do so every day.”, you overlook the small town situation, where the only doctor is a “deeply zealous” pro-lifer come catholic/liberal/control freak who is never going to alleviate the suffering of others until it’s a loved one involved.

      I vaguely remember reading recently, of a coalition mp/doctor who stated he has assisted a loved one, yet he would vote against V.E. for others.


      Oh and you go on to add “There was no public debate during the election campaign. It has come about purely as a result of Labor’s formal alliance with the Greens, and the determination of Senator Bob Brown.”  The “public debate” during the election campaign was driven largely by right wing (Murdoch) media, therefore most of the green’s platform was largely overlooked, and yet there was a strong swing to the greens.

    • Gregg says:

      06:45pm | 16/10/10

      Bill tells me he wears his devil label proudly and for what Phillip Nitschke has done for suffering people in Australia, shall we all become Catholics and petition him to be our next Saint.

    • Jules says:

      09:37am | 17/10/10

      Obliviously you have never been through the torture that is the name of death, watching a loved one suffer their last days is agonizing and a life changing experience.Get some of it before you comment about it. You have a lot to learn young David.

    • Peter Oataway, Hay, NSW says:

      10:21am | 17/10/10

      I think that someone facing a painfull terminal death including those confronting oxygen deprivation such as lung cancer sufferers should have the choice of euphenasia..not stop all feeding and stop giving water ..but a peaceful euphenased death at a time of their choice.

    • Marilyn says:

      06:07pm | 17/10/10

      I support the pro euthenasia lobby ( as about 85% of Australians do) and remember the appalling behaviour of the Howard goverment by the lack of recognition for this support.  Compare this to the lack of support for the invasion of Iraq by the Australian people, which had so little effect on his decision to support America.  Shameful!

    • Steely Dan says:

      10:34am | 18/10/10

      I don’t get it, Penbo.  What is it about Nitschke that’s ‘nutty’?  His euthanasia methods look funny?  He (and presumably all people who argue for euthanasia) are ignoring the other ways doctors can help people die soon (but not as soon as the patient would like)?  Some people don’t like his ‘renegade approach’?

      Why should these quibbles of yours sideline him from the debate again?

    • IMHO says:

      12:40pm | 18/10/10

      There’d only be a handful of people who could try to treat the issue of euthanasia humorously (which I assume was the intention of your inane post David Penberthy) and succeed in actually being funny.

      You’re not one of them!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter