You can understand why Kevin Rudd wanted to take out a virtual restraining order against the NSW Labor Government.

At the time Rudd just couldn't bring himself to support Iemma. Cartoon: Warren Brown

But despite his long-standing and open contempt for the NSW ALP, it has now emerged that Kevin Rudd was still prepared to insert himself in the biggest and most important policy battle in the party’s recent history – and then squib it when he was most required.

Rudd’s ambivalence towards this motley government is easy to comprehend. “Young Labor twenty years on” is how one party figure from NSW characterises the drift into personality politics, petty bickering and abuse, aberrant conduct and, most of all, policy paralysis which has marred the past few years of Labor rule in NSW.

It’s an evocative analogy. The exodus of relatively talented frontbenchers which followed Bob Carr’s sudden resignation in 2007 – former health minister Craig Knowles, deputy premier Andrew Refshauge, Treasurer Michael Egan, to name a few – left NSW Labor’s talent pool looking seriously depleted.

It enabled the rise of two-bit party hacks and hangers-on who a couple of decades ago were shouting at each other across the refectory and trying to shaft each other in the student elections, the difference being that they are now doing it in front of an entire state.

Losing one premier is bad luck, two might be considered careless, but getting rid of three in less than three years suggests that a pretty shocking pattern of behaviour has emerged, where the government is interested only in staying in power and will remain in a permanent state of war with itself to try to eke out an improbable and undeserved fifth term in office.

This extraordinary (and extraordinarily depressing) period of Australian politics is chronicled by Daily Telegraph political correspondent and former Macquarie St bureau chief Simon Benson in his new book Betrayal: The Underbelly of Australian Labor.

The book does a brilliant job in capturing the often cinematic quality of the treachery within the ALP.

There is one scene that is straight out of a movie – shortly before he was dumped by the party in late 2008, Morris Iemma held a series of informal meetings at his western Sydney home with the widely-disliked factional puppet masters Joe Tripodi and Eddie Obeid. There were a raft of changes underway to the frontbench – John Watkins was about to quit as Deputy Premier, John Della Bosca was set for the high jump, the deeply unpopular Reba Meagher was facing demotion, and Treasurer Michael Costa was threatening to quit over the abandonment of electricity privatisation.

At one of these dinner meetings Iemma overheard Tripodi and Obeid talking about Costa, in which it was said that the party would have “to get rid of both of them”.

Iemma did not believe what he heard at the time, that there was no way the pair would have been talking about him. He now believes that they were – given that he was rolled a couple of days later you can see why. To this day it remains one of the key reasons why he refuses to talk to his former best mate Tripodi, having invited him and Obeid into his home, where his wife Santina prepared a lovely dinner for the pair, who in Iemma’s view were prepared to sit under his roof furtively discussing the destruction of his career.

Ahead of his elevation to the federal Labor leadership, Kevin Rudd was happy to tell anyone who would listen that he feared the performance of the NSW Government could hold back the party’s vote in our most populous state at the 2007 federal poll.

But for all these misgivings, Rudd was still prepared to make a promise to back in the permanently embattled former premier Morris Iemma as he mounted a noble and brave attempt to privatise the state’s power industry.

And then, having made that promise, to renege, fearing that with federal Labor so far ahead in the polls, there was little point risking a debilitating and distracting battle with the labour movement.

Benson reveals in his book that, at a meeting attended by two senior Labor staffers, the then federal Opposition Leader told Iemma :“If you help me, I’ll get elected and you will prosper. Work with me and, when the time comes, we can f ... them [the unions] together.” He subsequently pulled away from that commitment.

The revelation is a bad one for Rudd, for two reasons.

It stands as a sneak preview of the vacillation we have seen from him as Prime Minister, as someone who is too prepared to walk away from tough decisions, or to simply abandon promises once they become too expensive or inconvenient.

It also gives Rudd some personal ownership of the genuine crisis of infrastructure in NSW.

The sell-off would have raised at least $20 billion, which as anyone who’s tried to catch a train in Sydney or been stuck on a tollway would attest, could have bought a lot of desperately needed infrastructure.

If the conservatives are smart they can sheet home some of the blame for this failure to Kevin Rudd. Obviously, it’s an honour he shares with the opportunistic NSW Liberal Leader Barry O’Farrell, who for base political motives blocked the power sale in defiance of long-standing Liberal Party principles.

But having promised to back Iemma, and then running away, Rudd looks like a bit of a coward who was prepared to put political convenience ahead of hard policy work.

The saddest part of all this is that Iemma was one of the very few people in the NSW Labor Party who was trying to change the culture of the show. Bob Carr and Michael Egan had tried and failed to win support for the power sale on the floor of ALP State Conference, and it was a tremendously brave move by Iemma to bring the debate on again, and to threaten to go it alone if need be, for the good of the State.

He knew that NSW was in economic trouble, he knew that it needed a big injection of money for infrastructure, he knew that Caucus and the industrial wing of the party needed to drag itself out of tired old ideological debates and into the 20th century.

A few years later and nothing has changed, all that has happened is that Iemma is gone, making way for Nathan Rees, who made way for Kristina Keneally, who now presides over the exact same problems Iemma had been trying to address by fixing state finances through a lucrative power sale.

Courtesy of Simon Benson’s book, we can thank Kevin Rudd in no small part for the fact that NSW remains in this parlous position, and that the one bloke who was trying to fix it is a footnote in history.

Most commented

35 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Against the Man says:

      06:39am | 05/06/10

      C’mon guys lets all just admit that this country made a BIG mistake electing Rudd. He has turned out to be the PM that just keeps screwing up over. Vote him in another term and we show no respect to ourselves and future generations.

    • Kevin and Julias social Engineering says:

      01:35pm | 05/06/10

      Both Iemma and Rudd are total incompetents,they simply buy votes and the sad reality is the labor heartland are sheep and follow dogma and spin,Abbott simply could not do any worse,Workchoices was a disaster and Libs must promise not to reinstate it,if they dont we are in for a term of Julia and Bill Shorten or Tanner,the prospect of which makes my skin crawl

    • Green = Labor = harsher ETS says:

      08:41pm | 06/06/10

      er, how was Workchoices a disaster?...when we had the lowest unemployment under it getting us through the GFC and ‘fairwork’ is basicly workchoices lite?

    • Luke says:

      06:43am | 05/06/10

      This really shows the true character of Kevin Rudd. What a disgusting individual. I’m surprised there hasn’t been more media over this story? People need to know who the real Kevin Rudd is.

    • Robert Smissen , rural SA says:

      07:39pm | 06/06/10

      Luke the reasons you won’t see more media are #1 most Journos are lefties anyway & #2 they are afraid that Little Kevvy’s media minders will ban them from press conferences

    • Mike says:

      07:12am | 05/06/10

      I heard about this the other day but haven’t seen anything on the news about it. Typical Rudd style, stuff Morris, stuff NSW, it’s all about “King Kevin” and being elected. I have a feeling he won’t be so lucky this time!

    • Peter Oataway says:

      07:36am | 05/06/10

      Enough is enough regardless of who you vote for I suggest we the people meet on Sunday 4th July 2010 at 11am in front of Parliament House Sydney and give Premier Keneally the message we the people of New South Wales want an election now ! .. Happy Independence Day

    • Joan says:

      10:42am | 05/06/10

      Pretty sweet talking peachy Keneally is not enough cover for the rotten core of current Labor - if I were a NSW voter I would want an immediate election. As for Rudd his preelection fairy floss turned out to be all pure rot and like Humpty Dumpty he has shown he is just a shell of a politician- and a rotten egg at that.

    • Eric2 says:

      09:16am | 05/06/10

      Two glaring errors with this article David.
      1. There was never any case for privatisation in NSW. And there wasn’t any consultation with the public.
      2. When the opposition - The Liberals - can’t land punches for several years on the lightweight likes of Iemma and Kenneally something is wrong is structurally wrong with our “two” party democracy - a democratic dysfunction. A dysfunction that allows an ongoing basket case and merely pushes voters towards their hated enemies – The Greens. Not real smart are they?

    • Glen says:

      11:48am | 05/06/10

      I think you are dramatically overstating Rudd’s influence on NSW Labor

    • Anthony says:

      12:34pm | 05/06/10

      OK I admit it I voted labour at the last election, sorry. Can we start a support group for people like me? Please the guilt is killing me.

    • Rudd virus cure says:

      09:10pm | 06/06/10

      At least you had admitted you had a problem,take two coalitions with a hot lemon drink

    • Wayne Fehlhaber says:

      01:39pm | 05/06/10

      Australia’s Prime minister , Kevin Rudd , has much to answer for , not only in the federal sphere but , as it is being revealed , also in the state sphere.
      New South Wales , his home state Queensland , Western Australia and South Australia all have reason to call the Prime Minister to account in the coming federal election .
      N.S.W. knows Morris Iemma was shafted by Kevin Rudd when it came to the clash with unions over state privatisation of power , now the state coffers are empty they will turn on Rudd for his treachery.
      Qld , S.A. , W.A.  are seething over the effects of the RSPT proposal , which makes for an interesting three months lead up to the election.

    • Diamantina Dick says:

      03:06pm | 05/06/10

      The sad part about this is actually that Bob Carr got away with it (doing nothing usefull) for 10 years and Iemma got elected in the first place, aided and abetted by Penbo; who does not yet appear to truly regret his editorial support. The fact is Iemma should never have risen beyond health minister and then become shadow.

    • BobM says:

      04:26pm | 05/06/10

      The $2 billion that was spent on Iemma’s baby,  the desalinastion plant, could have gone a long way in fixing some of the problems in NSW schools and hospitals. Labor governments, being all ex union hacks,  are just hopeless with money (witness Kevin Rudd) - they’ve never had to actually earn it, they just know how to screw over employers or anyone with a bit of business acumen. When they magically become politicians, they transfer their ‘screwing over’ onto us, the taxpayers - we are their unwitting money tree and golden goose. Witness the metro debacle - another half a billion dollars wasted - and the money has gone to their mates, the developers.

    • Andrew says:

      05:48pm | 05/06/10

      We have a similar problem here in South Australia - and it is set to grow to the same proportions. This is why fixed terms should be abolished. It is impossible to get rid of a truly corrupt government.

    • The night cometh says:

      06:02pm | 05/06/10

      No forgiveness for this Judas.

    • Front Back says:

      07:18pm | 05/06/10

      Does Persephone only work bankers’ hours?

    • antiperspirant says:

      08:02pm | 06/06/10

      No.

      Only Labor office hours.

    • Dave says:

      07:21pm | 05/06/10

      Penbo, given the fact that electricity prices are now set to go up 50%, surely these assets are worth more than if they were sold a couple of years ago. NSW is lucky their assets weren’t sold when the state govt tried to.

    • Micko says:

      09:34am | 07/06/10

      Electricity bills are going up because the energy companies are recouping billions and billions of the capex they have had to invest in new electricity infrastructure (look for yourself at the determination by the Australian Energy Regulator on Price http://www.aer.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/728076)—a substantial proportion of which would have come from the private sector, had the asset sale gone through.  Because public money now has to go into electricity infrastructure there is no Government borrowing capacity left for public transport infrastructure or roads.  If the electricity asset sale had gone through there would be tunnelling machines busily at work across Sydney right now.

    • Daniel says:

      08:09am | 06/06/10

      As much as I hate Labor andLiberal theALP has to be the most interesting behind the scenes.I wouldlove to be a fly on the wall when all this back room deals are going on. Its fascinating.

    • JM says:

      11:49am | 06/06/10

      Getting a bit tired of all this rubbish about “we the people” and demands for “early elections”. Tea-Party-ism at its most lame and self-serving.

      Perhaps people’s memories these days are no more enduring than the last media cycle, but I seem to recall a referendum held in 1981 when Neville Wran was Premier for four-year terms. The Liberals were quite happy to capitalise on this and there was not a murmur from them when Nick Greiner came to power, especially when we endured among other events the bizarre antics of one Terry Metherell, an Education Minister so incompetent and unpopular that parents and their kids marched on Parliament House demanding he be removed. And have you already forgotten that many of the events highlighted in the Wood Royal Commission took place under subsequent Liberal Governments?

      We wouldn’t be hearing these complaints no doubt if O’ Farrell was Premier - well maybe we would, because as soon as the ink dried on the declaration of the polls the Liberal Party far right will be crawling out from where they’ve been hiding, yammering for attention and their share of the spoils anyway, and some of us may well be regretting those long terms.

      Remember the Brogden Affair? Stand by for some more blood-letting.

    • cj says:

      12:04pm | 06/06/10

      “C’mon guys lets all just admit that this country made a BIG mistake electing Rudd.”

      Oh, I don’t know about that… Howard had to go. Now Rudd. A bit of a purge across the board - not to mention 20%+ primary vote going to the Greens, independents and “others” - and maybe a few in Canberra will start to get a clue?

    • John A Neve says:

      02:47pm | 06/06/10

      CJ,

      Right on, if people vote Labor and Liberal/National, last and second last. Then give their 1 vote to the best (in their view), independent or minor party. Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum might, just might get the message.

    • Destry says:

      05:14am | 07/06/10

      Why did Howard have to go? He brought in a golden age of prosperity for the nation, and affluence for the ordinary Australian, that we’d not seen before, and certainly not since.  It will be generations before the damage done by Rudd in 1 term is undone (if ever) at great cost.  All the crap about Workchoices being bad, and the Pascific Solution as inhumane,  was rhetoric: union and leftist electioneeering that fooled the ordinary, clueless Australian voter.  Howard was strong and had belief in himself and what had to be done in the national interest, the opposite of the changeling who occupies the Lodge today. History will record the last election as a national tragedy.  Howard only “had to go” in the eyes of morons who couldn’t find their own bums using both hands.

    • Jane says:

      04:01pm | 07/06/10

      Spot on Destry!
      I wonder who is keen to admit they voted Kev ‘07 now..and wear the T-shirt down the street!! I dare them.
      You don’t know what you got until it’s gone….sadly it takes awhile for the damage to be revealed…..and if people think the damage done already is bad..wait until it and the ramifications really hit the fan.

    • bloodsportforall says:

      01:29pm | 06/06/10

      Interesting to note that “Caucus and the industrial wing of the party needed to drag itself out of tired old ideological debates and into the 20th century”. This being the 21st century.

    • Alan Stockdale. says:

      02:25pm | 06/06/10

      Silly Rudd, he relied on the good condition of the economy thanks to the Libs to get through the GFC and had the gall to parade around like a massive hero who did the hard yards to get us through. He has dumped all the seamingly attractive policies like the ETS & promises of banning political advertising & put them in the too hard basket but has pushed ahead with the ridiculous policies like putting in a great big mandatory internet filter on everything.

      The guy relied too much on Howard being unpopular at the last election, what will he use now?

    • Russell says:

      07:34am | 07/06/10

      While the NSW circus is appalling for those of us who live here, it is very good for journalists. They have -
      1. Endless colourful scandals, one after the other
      2. A fun competition; The Tele vs SMH: Who will be first to claim Kristina Keneally’s scalp?
      3. Books to write! I may even read Simon’s one…

    • Micko says:

      09:35am | 07/06/10

      The story of the failure to privatise electricity in NSW is a shocking soap opera: Rudd is responsible because he ratted Iemma, O’Farrel is responsible because he failed to support it in Parliament, the unions are responsible because they couldn’t look past their short term vested interests, the Daily Telegraph is responsible for not putting pressure on O’Farrel to support the sale, the machine men (Arbib and Bitar) are responsible for pouring petrol on the fire and giving us Rees,  and Iemma is responsible for being such a fool and trusting Rudd.

      Sad, sad, sad….what will become of NSW.

    • Micko says:

      10:29am | 07/06/10

      Oh…and I forgot….we are all responsible for being caught up in our tiny little lives to take a real interest in really important things that are going on.  As an electorate we have earned the quality of Government we deserve.

    • Macon Paine says:

      12:27pm | 07/06/10

      I like most of your points (though it really is sad to see that Rudd is such a backstabber, no one even Iemma could see that coming) but I think in hindsight O’Farrell did the right thing in denying NSW Labor the $20B+ from the part privatisation.
      They have a long history of incompetance, especially when it comes to money eg ($500M+ down the gurgler for the CBD metro that doesn’t exist, the axed metro to Rouse Hill, some $2B over budget for the near useless Epping to Chatswood line, etc) there is just no way any reasonable person could trust them to actually spend the money properly and deliver what they promise.

    • Oliver Townshend says:

      09:21pm | 07/06/10

      Barry O’Farrell plays it hard like NSW Labor for once, and denies them the opportunity to waste $20 Billion, and he’s playing base politics?  When you plan in the mud, expect dirt I suppose.  It shows he has balls (since nothing else he’s done shows anything much at all).

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Lucy Kippist

A dying boy's last wish is to meet the Queen, so Helen Mirren steps in to fill the royal shoes: http://t.co/v4bVoOsPLZ

tory_maguire

Serious question. What's your definition of "terrorism"? Was the hideousness in London this morning a terrorist attack?

Paul Colgan

Emails reveal the direct negotiations between between Steve Jobs and James Murdoch on e-book prices http://t.co/D0n5VMCGfm

ToryShepherd

RT @theheraldsun: BREAKING NEWS: Ford set to announce it will shut plants at Broadmeadows and Geelong - http://t.co/uyL9nZB4L0

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter