When Fuifui Moimoi was penalised for stripping the ball from holding on to Billy Slater in last night’s NRL grand final, it brought a sudden halt to a late surge by the Eels with four minutes to play.

Not the only time Moimoi was thrown last night

Moments earlier Moimoi had scored in the corner, carrying two Storm players over the line with him on his hulking frame after barging through the defence in a 22m run. It marked the apogee of the Eels’ resurgence against a Melbourne side that was in control for most of the game.

Before the penalty, the Eels needed a converted try tie the game and force extra time. The way they were playing it looked possible. But with ball now in hand, the Storm kicked downfield and calmly positioned themselves for the field goal. Greg Inglis delivered. Job done for the Storm; fairytale over for the Eels.

Like most Sydneysiders I had nothing but good will for the Eels, who played thrilling football during this finals series.

The penalty against Moimoi was one of those moments in sport that makes you think the referee is playing for the other team.

It came just as the Eels were dominating the Storm so much they looked like they could pull off an astonishing comeback. They had a spring in their step and there was hope in the air.

But at such moments, an official’s whistle can be an elephant gun to the stampede. And Tony Archer pulled the trigger.

Referees have a strong hand in the writing of sporting annals across codes. In football, England’s legendary 1966 World Cup win hinged on a controversial goal in extra time, while Diego Maradona’s “goal of the century” against the Poms in 1986 is forever marred by the fact that he had handled the ball into the net just minutes before - and the ref had missed it.

It hasn’t been a good year for the NRL referees. A fan got a lifetime ban from the game for tackling a referee who had controversially sin-binned Wests Tigers star Benji Marshall. 

There were other game-deciding refereeing controversies, but one in particular stands out. In the first State of Origin game, when NSW fullback and Eels star Jarryd Hayne danced down the touchline to score but was adjudged to have trod on the line with his boot and the try was disallowed.

Of course, everyone in NSW could see the blade of grass between his boot and the line. The video referee couldn’t see it despite repeated replays.

The decision killed NSW’s early momentum in the game. Queensland went on to win it and the series.

But that’s sport. Infringements go by unseen by the refs; penalties are awarded, like last night, when it’s possible no foul has been occurred.

Some will say the call last night cost the Eels the game. But the result was a fair reflection of the teams on the park. The Storm outclassed the Eels for most of the game and, all things being equal, deserved to win it.

What do you think?

Now if only someone can figure out what to do with all the gold and blue paraphernalia sold in Sydney last week.

UPDATE: The referee involved said later the penalty was not for stripping, but for holding on. First paragraph amended.

57 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • artie says:

      06:14am | 05/10/09

      ...burn the parra-phernalia. it deserves it. go storm!

    • Geoff says:

      07:23am | 05/10/09

      Being there at the game, we got to see the other MASSIVE refereeing errors that Archer made that might have been missed by the TV audiences at home: there wasn’t a single set of 6 in the first half where the Storm were on-side.

      Sometimes they were three metres in front of Archer at the play of the ball. In a game where shutting down the offload and stopping the fast play of the backs was so important to stopping the Eels, it was hard to think Archer was doing anything other than playing for the Storm. When the Moimoi decision was made at the death, it just showed those at home the sort of bias we’d been seeing all game…

    • Grahame Eade says:

      07:34am | 05/10/09

      The penalty was correct. Moimoi grabbed at Slater’s legs and dragged him down as he was trying to get to his feet to play the ball. Dumb play by Moimoi.

    • Geoff says:

      07:49am | 05/10/09

      Just rewards for Inglis getting his head ripped off 10m out from the try line after kicking.

    • Greensborough Growler says:

      07:53am | 05/10/09

      Neither Keating or Haynes should have played due to last week’s indiscretions. Yet you complain about the injustice of it all.

      Suffer in your jocks.

    • Old Clive says:

      07:58am | 05/10/09

      Who cares!!!. It is not sport anymore, lets get back to district sports.

    • JACK GILBERT says:

      08:01am | 05/10/09

      I am not a supporter of either side, but I enjoyed the game very much, if people had been watching the game properly they would have seen slater tackled around the legs, and on trying to get to his feet he was grabbed again and lost the ball. the referee was right (penalty).
                                                        GREAT GAME BY BOTH SIDES

    • Wayne says:

      08:02am | 05/10/09

      Why is it that New South Welshman always seem so hard done by. Best team won on the day. FACT!!! Build a bridge and get over it you sooks….
      Go QUEENSLANDERS< four in a row…the way to go…

    • Samuel says:

      08:04am | 05/10/09

      Referee decisions tend to even themselves out in the end.  And it’s fair to say that it wasn’t a bad call that cost the Eels, it’s that they weren’t good enough in the first place.  The real question is not whether or not the ref cost them, it’s why didn’t they slide in defence better on Cooper Cronk for the second try, and why didn’t they contest the bomb that led to Inglis scoring?  It’s only until these types of issues are addressed that the ref’s performance comes into the equation.  You should be able to play well enough that a bad call won’t effect the result.

    • andy says:

      08:06am | 05/10/09

      Storm stinks NRL stinks… what a waste of time watching that game

    • Neatoboy says:

      08:06am | 05/10/09

      The best team won on the day. Congrats to Melbourne Storm!

    • rob says:

      08:07am | 05/10/09

      It just canceled out the decision a minute earlier when Slater was ruled to have knocked on when he was facing his own try line….footy Karma, what goes around comes around.

    • Go Storm says:

      08:18am | 05/10/09

      The penalty was for holding the leg/foot, not stripping the ball, according to Archer, that being the case, i think it was the right call, but never let facts get in the way of a good story, right….

      Go Storm

    • simon says:

      08:21am | 05/10/09

      The incredibly biased commentary aired on channel 9 in Melbourne during the game has been echoed since by an anti-Victorian protectorate who are an indictment on rugby league.
      Storm deserve to be feted for their consistently high performances, not to have all the wind taken out of their sails by bitter and disgraceful Sydneyites.

    • Jodie says:

      08:22am | 05/10/09

      Bias - honestly Storm couldn’t do a think right - even their tries were called soft. Face it - a better team one, they played as a well oiled machine and eels crumbled… there were alot of calls earlier in the game that went eels way, so don’t cry over the spilt milk!

    • Ben says:

      08:32am | 05/10/09

      What a bias article.  No mention of the late hit on Inglis in the first half 5 metres from the line which may have resulted in a try to the storm to go even further in front.

      And the penalty was for holding down Slater, not stripping.  You can try and sell it as that as much as you like but it won’t change the fact of it.

    • Whinger says:

      08:32am | 05/10/09

      Perhaps the author might explain to a dumb AFL follower how the Slater knock-on was possible when it bounced off his body towards the Parramatta try line? It was an error, people get over these calls and get on with the game.
      It was pleasing to hear the broadcast on Channel 9 and SEN was totally unbiased and balanced. What a pathetic bunch. When Johnson received a coathanger it was all in the game for Grand Final, the number of times Warren wanted and whinged about Parra not getting frees was incredible. I have never heard anything like it, except from Eddie McGuire when Collingwood play and he calls the game.

    • Paul says:

      08:36am | 05/10/09

      Can anyone explain to me how is this era of of supposed parity due to the salary cap, how a team can make four grand finals in a row and manage to keep all their players.

      Oh thats right they are half owned by news limited (and threfore the league owns half) and they are never going to pick apart the team they are trying to push into enemy territory

      Just like when the broncos first joined and got all the breaks now it is Melbourne’s turn.

    • O says:

      08:40am | 05/10/09

      Moimoi was not penalised for stripping the ball but not releasing the player, it was clearly indicated that way by the referee and it is typical that the Sydney media has blown it up to something that it is not.
      Go Storm

    • Ben says:

      08:47am | 05/10/09

      @Paul (8:36am) - Do it even occur to you that the storm players may have taken salary sacrifices to play together?  I don’t know if you follow AFL but Geelong have done the equivalent to the Storm (Consecutive GF’s) because their players wanted to keep the team together so accepted the pay cuts to do so.

    • grewy says:

      08:47am | 05/10/09

      well for all u melbourne supporters u better go find a replay cause tony archer called for a strip u idiots he did the actions of a strip motion and also said a strip even his confused he better watch the replay himself

    • Heléna says:

      08:51am | 05/10/09

      stripped or not - it was a ridiculous call! - the Eels were robbed

    • tags says:

      08:53am | 05/10/09

      As an AFL supporter I agree with the comment re the eddie maguire call - it was a case of severe deja vous to hear Warren use the term “we” when talking about the eels as in “we just need to get the ball…” or whatever. Bizarre.

    • John says:

      09:01am | 05/10/09

      @ grewy

      How can a ball travel forward, when you are facing your own try line, have the ball bounce off your chest, and have it called a knock on? (Slatter penalty)

    • B says:

      09:07am | 05/10/09

      Grewy is right, he indicated “strip” Archer now has seen the replay and knows it wasn’t so he’s trying to change the call. If it was for a hold down, there were lots of worse incidents during the night that weren’t penalised.

      Slater did knock on whenhe contested the high ball earlier as well.

      Personally I hate the eels, but watching the game, Melbourne still refereed softly in the ruck.

    • Alan says:

      09:10am | 05/10/09

      The refreeing has been to a poor standard all year.  Why should it be any different for the big game.
      The players are continuing to improve in fitness, skills and technical aspects of the game, and yet the refree’s appear shy away from making a decision, asking everyone else to make the decisions for them.  Two refs only allows for twice as many mistakes.  The UK Superleague seems to have a higher quality of refs.
      Also the way they talk to most players on the field is appaling.

    • Pete says:

      09:13am | 05/10/09

      Watch his (Archer) motion during the game- he motioned strip. The guy is loose with the truth at best

    • regina says:

      09:24am | 05/10/09

      oh come on.  the only reason news limited’s papers are full of this so-called penalty scandal is because it sells papers, specifically to parra supporters in sydney who are keen to maintain the rage.

      they weren’t robbed at all. the truth is storm were by far the better team on the day. they deserved to win.

    • Jeremy says:

      09:33am | 05/10/09

      yeh it was a bad call. Would there have been such uproar if it happened to a Storm player? When Moimoi scored minutes earlier it looked like his foot was clearly on the touch line. The commentators didnt mention it and obviously the video ref didn’t want to see it either. The video ref gave one of the quickest decisions they’ve made all year to award the try. Bizarre. My mates and I thought that was super weird. Didn’t Greg Inglis get taken out on the try line after a chip kick in the first half? No mention of that. We almost turned the volume on the TV off for the commentators were only watching the game with one eye open. It was almost like the audio was coming from the Parramatta coaching box! Highly un-professional but then again you don’t excpect much more from those buffoons. In the end, the better team won and it quite clearly hurts a lot for the losers on monday morning.

    • Henryk says:

      09:38am | 05/10/09

      Well,  so ends another great season where it came down to No.4 on the ladder Vs. No. 8 on the ladder.  Errors by referees and players have often featured in the results of a game.  Roll on the 2010 season.

    • Peter says:

      09:40am | 05/10/09

      The Eels lost it in the set before that penalty when attacking the Storm’s line and the lock ended up with the ball on the 5th and put in an inept kick. The half or five-eigth should have got the ball and either hoisted it high or put it in the in-goal for another six.

    • Durance says:

      09:47am | 05/10/09

      It was a correct call as it happenedl: even if incorrect that is the nature of sports - mistakes happen -

    • Dave says:

      09:52am | 05/10/09

      Whether or not the penalty was justified it certainly sank the eels chances and cost fans a very exciting couple of minutes.  I doubt it cost the eels the game and the Storm were certainly the better side for the majority of the match.

    • bot says:

      09:52am | 05/10/09

      it looked like that offside eel running thru knocked it out of billys mits anyways, rather than billy losing it clean / or fuifui holding too long. if you wanna see dirty mofos slowing the play-the-ball look no further than terry campese. that guy is a tool.

    • Tails says:

      09:55am | 05/10/09

      And if ifs and buts were beer and nuts we’d all be having a party. Pass the smoked eel terrine, there’s a good chap.

    • Lolly says:

      09:58am | 05/10/09

      Parra fans are the leagues’ worst whingers.  The Moimoi decision had no bearing on the result and yes - it was a penalty for not allowing Slater to get off the ground. Forgetting the fact that the NRL allowed Hayne and Keating to play, the Eels decision not to take Cronk’s bomb, the fact that Hayne had no influence and the fact that Melbourne were a much better side had the bearing on the result. The only thing better than Melbourne winning is listening to the Sydney biased media whingeing.

    • Andrew says:

      09:58am | 05/10/09

      stupid penalty, but no one has picked up the melbournes second try, the ball did NOT touch the ground, check your replays people. granted it would have been awarded for benefit of the doubt. but the ball did NOT touch the ground!!!!

    • Jonathan Appleyard says:

      10:13am | 05/10/09

      You have to wonder when teams become reliant on refereeing calls going their way in the 77th minute. There is no doubt the best team won.

    • Jeff says:

      10:14am | 05/10/09

      Enjoy your sour grapes, Colgan.

      The Hayne Train is obviously run by Connex - doesn’t work when the heat is on.

      (Of course, you won’t get that reference - it’s a Melbourne thing).

    • Lucas says:

      10:16am | 05/10/09

      You win some you lose some.  Remember 2006 and the Storm now gets payback.

    • Davo from St Kilda says:

      10:53am | 05/10/09

      Typical Sydney poor sports. What a disgrace they are.

    • Warwick says:

      10:54am | 05/10/09

      It was a great match - despite the obvious refing errors! Storm outworked the Eels, and they won as a result. And their unselfish team play means that awarding the Clive Churchill Medal became a joke! Giving it to the Darling of the Commentators - I have never heard so much rubbish about an average fullback who takes chances. He is not the best player in the game, no matter what the commentators say! Has everyone forgotten the pass he did during last years RL world cup?

      Hindmarsh was the single most outstanding player on the field, with Moimoi a close second! Even Inglis did more and made more of an impact than Slater did!

    • John says:

      11:09am | 05/10/09

      In the 2006 Grand Final the Storm were refereed out of it by that goose Simkins (who hasn’t reffed an NRL game since).  Where was the outrage from the press then ? Just the old Sydney - Melbourne thing kicking in again. With the A League, AFL and Sheffield Sheild all held down south, this trophy will just add to the crowd.  For God’s sake they are going to get a Super14 franchise as well !!!  Help ......

    • bc says:

      11:12am | 05/10/09

      NSW really doesn’t take losing well, do they?

    • shane geyes says:

      11:28am | 05/10/09

      Who cares? Rugby is crap! Go Melbourne Victory and Hawthorn Hawks!

    • M Watson says:

      11:44am | 05/10/09

      Why do the other states hate it when Victoria wins? Is it because we are the A-League champions, NRL champions, Cricket champions, Basketball champions, Netball champions and of course the AFL champions? Or is it because we have 5 world class stadiums and the highest sporting attendences in Australia? Or is it because we host the Australian F1 Grand Prix, the Australian Tennis Open, the Australian Moto GP and the Melbourne Cup (Horse Racing)? I don’t think so.

      I think they hate it most when we win their game. They know the NRL is their game and that no-one in Melbourne really even knows the rules. So when Melbourne Storm won their second GF after 4 straight GF’s, it killed them. Even though most Victorians would not have even tuned in to watch the game, we pride ourselves on winning a sport that isn’t ours.

      The penalty decision didn’t change the game, Melbourne were always going to win that game because we are best at every sport and always will be. Call us arrogant, call us whatever you want, but we let our trophies do the talking.

      ‘‘Here we are under these particular stars, here we stand…...Victorian.’’

    • hic says:

      11:56am | 05/10/09

      Gee, you sydneysiders will grab onto anything wont you?
      We win….you lose!

    • Matt says:

      11:59am | 05/10/09

      Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha…With how many penalties in the game, in Parra’s favour mind you. And the cry is about the last one against them. Parra had a great run and played a great game, the ref didn’t lose it for them, the Storm simply out played and beat them. Well done Storm and well done Slater.

    • Tim says:

      12:29pm | 05/10/09

      no mention of Inglis nearly having his head taken off Paul? Best team won.

    • Pk says:

      12:33pm | 05/10/09

      Give me a break - more Sydney elitist ‘we waz robbed’ crap.

      The eels were not in it except for 15 minutes in the second half when they got on a roll. The eels then gave away a penalty and dropped their bundle - that means they weren’t good enough to win.

      But let’s look at some harsh calls.

      Nathan Hindmarsh twice lost the ball in loose carries in the first half (which many people are adamant he ‘lost’ to get a penalty), and Krisnan Inu performed a dive (and got the penalty) Jared Hayne would be proud of when replays showed he was tackled across the chest (he went down clutching his face). Three dodgy calls against the storm, three dodgy penalties, and the eels still lost.

      The storm were entitled to complain, but didn’t. Why, because while the referees didn’t get every call right, he still refereed a good game. What a shame Paul, that rather than focus on the positives of the game such as some amazing hit ups and defence by FuiFui and some attacking brillance by Inglis and Slater, you choose to encourage people to rage against referees.
      What a shame.

    • Bella says:

      06:32pm | 05/10/09

      Call it karma for the Eel’s disgraceful game the previous week against Canterbury. If the only way you can make it into the grand final is to maim and cripple your opposition, you don’t deserve the trophy. Add to that, Melbourne were simply better on the day. Suck it up you Sooks!

    • Killah Kiwi says:

      07:04pm | 05/10/09

      Just for the ill-informed, the rules of rugby league state that a knock-on is when THE BALL is propelled towards the opponents goal line, not which way the player is facing. And to Shane Gays, we are talking about Rugby League, not Rugby. Nevertheless, both these codes are played by over 40 countries, compared to AFL, a sport that is only played by one country. Go the Queensland Storm (still no players from Melbourne after 10 or so years) and go the World Champion Kiwis in the four nations.

    • Michael says:

      08:20pm | 05/10/09

      M Watson says: “I think they hate it most when we win their game. They know the NRL is their game…”

      Sounds a bit familiar, but i cant quite put my finger on - - OH WAIT that’s right, it’s in the AFL. The most Melbourne-centric game despite its claims to possessing a truly national competition. In saying that, you are right. It is sour grapes on the part of the Sydney-centric “National” Rugby League supporters, but Vics shouldn’t be calling the kettle “Blue”.

    • Mr Ed Wilbur says:

      08:12am | 06/10/09

      Stop Whingeing you Parra fans, you were lucky to get even so close!!!!!

    • Ben says:

      09:06am | 06/10/09

      Killah Kiwi
      I Think people are referring to Physics, more than anything, that is a ball hit a wall (object) it to some extent bounces back, not the Rugby rules themselves, that Slater was facing his goal line seems rather suggestive unless the ball hit his back, it almost certainly went backwards, t have have gone forward, still I think the best team on the day won.

    • Micha says:

      09:34am | 13/12/09

      Aw, poor little Parra warra. Even if they did get the penalty, where’s the garantee they would have scored? They would have to convert it to stay in the game and Burt had missed one earlier from the side. And you forget, even if you had scored and converted, it wouldn’t have won you the game, you only would have lost it. Its the same when Crocker tackled the rapist Stewart in the 2007 grand final. It was a completely legal tackle. Its a violent game. Stick to soccer, Sydney. Its better you play non-contact sports, you sore losers. Here’s an egg, suck hard.
      Warrick: Yes he is the best player in the world. 4 tries in a final and a golden boot don’t go to people who just take risks.
      Kiwi: Queensland Storm my ar*e. Hoffman, White, Inglis (yes he is a NSWelshman), Finch, Quinn, Turner, Hinchcliffe, Tolman, Lima, Blair, Tandy and even Bellamy. All Queenslanders are they? Idiot

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

@AndrewCatsaras Agreed. Kills more people than AIDS. Yet tolerated. Meanwhile: Good Insiders piece again Andrew.

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @JamieTravers: I'm in Europe and don't care for Eurovision, why is my twitter feed filled with Aussies recounting the bloody thing!?

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter