Every now and then life deals you a moment which overloads your emotions.

Crowds gather outside Parliament House for Sorry Day. Picture: Phil Hillyard.

You’re not sure whether to cry or cheer or run and hide just to catch your breath.

That’s how I felt standing on the sixth floor of NAB’s Melbourne headquarters when watching Kevin Rudd’s apology to my people’s stolen generation.

It was a watershed moment as we finally, and officially, acknowledged the wrongs of the past. In a strange unexpected way it has also nudged a once concerned, but not involved, corporate Australia to look in the mirror and ask what role it has to play in addressing Indigenous disadvantage.

But in the interim what has really happened? Australia, like the rest of the world, was convulsed by the Global Financial Crisis and while our economy has held up well, the financial meltdown resulted in many companies reassessing their operations. Much of this navel gazing has centred on discretionary spending and, traditionally, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) programs have been viewed as such.

CSR has always been a rubbery concept, but in a nutshell, it is how companies engage with external groups and issues not related to making the company money. Typically this has covered environmental issues and community relations, and for some companies, Indigenous engagement.

The aim has been for organisations to participate or support selected issues and groups, position themselves as good corporate citizens and build a buffer around the company’s reputation.

But since the Apology, economic pressure has forced a rethink of CSR that has lead to budget cuts and inertia.  Along with this, the proposed Emission Trading Scheme has meant promoting environmental credentials - one of the planks of CSR programs - is no longer optional. Now, a company’s green considerations are an issue of compliance.

Some corporations have seized this opportunity to make fundamental changes in their approach to CSR and refocus on what is really important. For some, that has meant embracing Indigenous programs and investing more, not less.

Indeed, some of Australia’s largest businesses, such as Qantas, Telstra and NAB, have decided they have a direct role to play in addressing the disadvantage experienced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

Most organisations formulate their approach through a Reconciliation Action Plan. The RAP program is run by Reconciliation Australia and aims to turn good intentions into action by supporting organisations to leverage their strengths and contribute to closing the 17-year life expectancy gap between Indigenous and other Australians.

There are now 165 organisations with RAPs, compared with jut 33 in January 2008. Specifically, 17 of these are companies (compared with three previously) with another 14 companies due to release their RAPs this year.

What is more, approximately 1.48 million Australians work in an organisation with a RAP, which is around 14 per cent of our working population.

RAPs are many and varied but for NAB, we have focused on three areas: promoting financial inclusion; building access to long-term jobs; and supporting within our bank understanding and respect for Indigenous Australians.

These goals and the ways we achieve them will never make front page news but that is not what this is about. Indigenous programs are important to our staff and our customers and now are part of who we are.

These programs also make a practical, tangible difference to people’s lives. For instance, helping setting up a bush foods catering business in Sydney; or assisting a Year 12 student acquire skills through a School Based Trainee program which has now landed the student a full-time role.

Small victories like these are the building blocks of Reconciliation, but added together over the long term they will create a powerful social force and that can only be a good thing for all Australians.

I encourage other Australian organisations who care about a reconciled future to start their own Reconciliation Action Plan journey and see what difference they can make.

19 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Lou says:

      01:54pm | 11/02/10

      I completely agree that responsibility for reconciliation lies with individuals as well as organisations and government. While broad policy may change relatively quickly, attitudes on the ground ted to lag behind. I can only hope that the next generation grow up aware and respectful of the rich heritage of this country, that the wounds can begin to heal, and we grow stronger together.

      ‘Through unity reconcilliation is not a dream’ - Reginald Birch OAM

    • nic says:

      02:13pm | 11/02/10

      The whole notion of Reconciliation is a worthy one but is emotive and is at best, a subtext for white business/government agencies to do a bit of hand wringing. The fact that Reconciliation seldom seems to involve action by aborigines themselves to solve some very sad problems leads me to the conclusion that such reconciliatory acts by business are racist because they assume Aboriginal people are incapable of playing a self-determinatory role in solving problems.

    • Sandra Kelly says:

      09:28pm | 12/02/10

      Well I’ve been involved with Indigenous people in this country - on a community and with another organization working WITH Aboriginal people to solve the many issues that beset them thanks to over 200 years of living under European rule, and I know for a fact that they are working very hard indeed toward reconciliation and have fought long and hard to make a better life for themselves and future generations. There’s a lot of extremely strong, intelligent indigenous people out there doing the best very they can.

    • Anthony says:

      02:41pm | 11/02/10

      Yes.  You are exactly right.  I usually don’t get caught up in Indigenous affairs (I am not of Indigenous origin myself), but I think it’s about time we moved forward together to build a better Australia for everyone.  But I also think that more has to be done.  We can’t just say:  “Yipee, Racial Harmony” and not actually do anything.  In some way or another, we all need to help each other, in order to help ourselves.

    • E says:

      03:32pm | 11/02/10

      sigh, you cant expect 1st world 21st century health and well being outcomes living a 3rd world pre stone age lifestyle (but with booze).
      Its ridiculous to talk about ‘closing the gap’ , the gap is traditional.

    • John A Neve says:

      03:32pm | 11/02/10

      Glen Brennan,
      Might like to tell us what are the “wrongs of the past”.  Was it the whites killing the blacks or the blacks killing the whites?
      There is no doubt every one in this country is better off following white settlement.
      Most, if not all racist agitators are neither black or white, they are of mixed race.  they are not concerned with right or wrong, they are just filling their pockets.
      Crying poor me, is just an easy meal ticket.

    • Luke says:

      03:46pm | 11/02/10

      I’m still waiting for the British Government to issue me with an apology for the treatment of my ancestors who were shackled, chained, flogged and treated like animals, taken away from their families then sent to the other side of the world for stealing a loaf of bread to feed themselves.

    • fluffy says:

      08:19pm | 11/02/10

      dont be dumb… they did them a favour.  difference is..  you can still go live in england, black fellas will never get their country back.

    • Affected By Racism says:

      01:44pm | 13/10/10

      Unlike Englands treatment to their citizens there wasn’t mass racism across the board with all segments of the country not being employed. Which relates directly to racism and that impowers the few the whites, as for some people with mixed orgines then you only have to look at NSW most and say being 99% of Aboriginal people are mixed and you must remeber that this was not the choice of the Aboriginal person if was forced on the Abiriginal person but even if this is so the mixed blood is still be distriminated against at such a rate that in my appinion Australia should come under the same principles as which governed South Africia during the time of APTARTIDE given the level of racism, no hope in this climate with racism

    • Wayne G says:

      11:17pm | 11/02/10

      The Rudd government is now using the apology as a justification for its policy approach in Indigenous affairs. The Federal Government had never heard of the words “close the gap”. - it was a non government agency which started building a ground swell of support to address Indigenous disadvantage. Governments only act when there’s votes to be lost. You win no votes in Indigenous Affairs. The longer Corporate Australia embraces Indigenous programs and provides social investment the longer Governments will stay interested.  We as a nation must not let the momemtum gained from the apology waver, so that the apology hasn’t accomplish anything beyond the validation of the experience of the stolen generations.

    • Peter Logue says:

      08:17am | 12/02/10

      as someone who grew up amid “the troubles” in Northern Ireland, I know how important economic security, the right to work, the right to a home and meaningful vote is. Yes, there are larger issues of identity and ownership, but economic security and opportunity for indigenous people should be a top priority.  Nice to see that at least some in the business community are finally recognising this and taking action. More please. Good article, Glen.

    • Darren says:

      09:18am | 12/02/10

      some matters in public life offer insight to national values. and others offer insight into the extent of an individual’s values. However wouldn’t it be good if there was some consistency?
      There is an authentic public service that seeks to bring the fair go to all Australians-that includes efforts by individuals, companies and organisations alike.
      How Australian is it to sledge companies/people for having a go?

    • Kel says:

      10:09am | 12/02/10

      Yaama,

      For over 13 years i have worked in the not for profit sector, chasing grants form the Government to enable our Community to forge ahead with “purely surviving”. Trying to find an Aboriginal person a job, access to traininng, support to start a business, or increasing access to essentail services has and is a difficult task. I have read Mr Brennans article, i applaud NAB on their efforts, innovative strategys and programs and that their focus for social commitment wasnt designated to one area, that they can support enterprise, employment and social inclusion within their business. i feel assured that if more Corporates followed the lead of Mr Brennan and his team, the struggle that is faced by Aboriginal people in this country day in and day out would start to decrease. Mr Brennan article reminds me that through these programs its not just a job thats an outcome, these success’ allow Aboriginal people to be included, self determining, self governing, we can start to dream, start to hope, we can celebrate achievements. Keep up the fantastic work Mr Brennan and NAB, the more leaders liek you have in this country the better our future might be!!!

    • dmulholland says:

      10:23am | 12/02/10

      Uncle Reg’ Birch is right, yet our voice and power to make decision at the top end of the society sector to corporate is made by non Aboriginal people, our voices are heard yet our directions and input are misplaced. Unity needs to be one voice from two.

    • James S says:

      11:01am | 12/02/10

      This approach is a marked improvement on previous programs from both the public and private sectors that created the welfare mentality as described by Noel Pearson. However, I think that whilst it is important to note the developments in this area of reconciliation there is a need to stop looking so narrowly at the benefits. Glen the benefits of the initiatives that you, the NAB and other such private and public organisations are implementing are not restricted to individuals or even communities. These programs are about the development of Australia as a whole and should be viewed and applauded as such.

    • Jeffrey says:

      01:14pm | 12/02/10

      Glen
      So many tears have fallen on both sides. How do we integrate indigenous australia with the avarice of white australia? Talk of the haves and the have nots, the wants and the don’t needs. The cultural differences alone will need a lot more understanding and respect, than the mere 200 years that have elapsed since the first white man, to unify indigenous australia with white australia. Would Rudds apology mean more to the older indigenous community that were directly affected by the reckless abandonment of their culture and civil rights. Obviously there is a passing on to the next generation, of the loss, fear, resentment, humiliation and degradation that the indigenous people have endured. The work required to bridge the gap needs to be sustained and expanded on, opportunity and respect!

      As to John A Neve, “There is no doubt every one in this country is better off following white settlement” 

      Better off in what way, bigger house or car, more money, more possessions…..

      All of Australia’s natural beauty throughout its resources, lands, mountains, rivers, lakes, oceans, forests and mountains were here long before and will remain long after white settlement…the only difference, it costs a hell of lot more to live in a white mans world.
      Not to talk of the white mans predilection for forcing not only its will and greed but one of their worst habits…alcohol consumption.

    • John A Neve says:

      08:46am | 13/02/10

      Jeffrey,
      One can only assume you would prefer to live at the standard prior to white settlement?
      I also take it you doubt people are better off today, than 200 years ago?
      As to Australia’s “natural beauty” how would you know what it was like
      before white settlement?

      Truth is Jeffery, your whole post is based on hearsay, the real loo-loo is your suggestion that people are forced to drink alcohol!!

      Do you spend you whole life blaming others for your shortcomings, YES your obviously do.

    • Jeffrey says:

      11:45am | 14/02/10

      John
      I assume nothing John. ASS U ME…...As a whole, indigenous people dont have the same desire to possess or own as white settlers, they shared and still share, the land and the fruits and bounty of the land, rivers and seas.

      Of course, people are better off….....
      - health - even though we fill the pharmaceutical coffers,
      - longevity of life - at times without quality or reason,
      - mental health - stress, trying to fulfill your ideal of ‘better off’,
      - lifestyle choices.
      But, does that mean that the white settlers should possess indigenous Australia, to forego and forget their culture and history all for being better housed or having material possessions.
      John, even you would not have to had lived 200 years ago to appreciate Australia’s natural beauty, contrary to your thoughts, Australia’s natural beauty was not a gift from the white settlers.
      Yes, the white settlers did in fact introduce the alcohol and as i am sure, you being an intelligent man and such, may agree, that the introduction with the segregation, slave-like treatment and at times reckless abandonment of the indigenous people contributed to the problems of today.
      I blame no-one but I do not live in denial of past deeds and how they in turn help shape the future.

    • John A Neve says:

      07:31am | 15/02/10

      Jeffrey,
      Much of what you have said I agree with. I don’t deny past mistakes, but I cannot change the past. This and other governments have, in my view, tried to correct past mistakes, in many, not all, cases those who needed help, abused this help.

      There are now many people of mixed blood who, for their own ends are continually stiring up inter racial trouble. Based on all I’ve read there are now only about 200,000 full blooded early Australians. The rest of us are Australians of mixed blood. What we are suffering is the ongoing actions of a rabid few.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

This concern for Thomson won’t change the script

This concern for Thomson won’t change the script

Under pressure himself over his crusade against Craig Thomson, Tony Abbott has moved to present a softer…

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter