I noticed on Facebook recently that there was a group called ‘I confess: I watch Question Time and I LIKE it’. 

Kevin Rudd gives what is known as QT finger

The group has surprising large membership of over three thousand highlighting the joy of Facebook; you can always find a niche!

Some of the most famous and well known Parliamentary incidents have occurred in Question time.

Remember the Paul Keating ‘I will do you slowly’ taunt to John Hewson and Peter Costello’s demolition of Labor’s Scoresby ‘free’ way broken promise or better still his dancing interpretation of Peter Garrett. 

Question time is ‘show time’ in Parliament and it has produced some of the very best and the very worst of our democratic institution.

But Question time is more than just a clever one liner and jibes between the senior players; it plays a vital role in ensuring the government of the day is answerable to the Parliament and therefore the people.

However I worry that the very strength of the institution is being tested by the treatment of Question time by the current and to a degree the former government.

Most people would be unaware that the Question time is governed by ‘standing orders’ that are set by the Parliament.  The Speaker of the House is the umpire of these rules.

The ‘standing orders’ state that Question time will be conducted every sitting day at 2pm and that answers from Ministers to the questions asked ‘must be relevant’.

Generally each day there are ten questions from the Opposition and ten questions from the Government, the most famous woman in Parliament - Dorothy Dixer. 

The practice has developed that the Dorothy questions are used to batter the opposition over their alleged failings or to make a statement about an issue the government considers important. 

Unfortunately in recent times, Dorothy has been used and abused much to the detriment of the Parliament. 

For instance during the last sitting fortnight the Prime Minister slogged his way through fifteen long minutes in answering a Dorothy.  It is little wonder the crowds are down this season!

But by far the biggest problem that has developed with Question time is the interpretation of the ‘must be relevant’ standing order.  By using the broadest definition of this rule, government ministers simply ignore the question asked and rant on about the political point they wish to make. 

Senator Alan Ferguson from my home state of South Australia has conducted an enormous amount of research on how Question time works and more importantly how it can be improved. 

Senator Ferguson for some time held the lofty position of Senate President, meaning he had responsibility for the conduct of the Question time in the Senate.

He has considered how Question time is run in other western democracies and concluded that we trail badly.  Following this research he moved to improve the situation in the Senate. 

This lead to the Senate changing how Question time is conducted, mainly in an attempt to shame the House of Representatives into following suit. 

I agree with Senator Ferguson, we need to change the way we conducted Question time.

The man in charge of Question time strategy for the Government, Anthony Albanese will say ‘welcome to opposition, enjoy your stay’ but this sort of school yard revenge politics is hardly good for our democracy.

Senator Ferguson from his study has concluded that the best system in comparable democracies is that which operates in New Zealand. 

Question time in the New Zealand Parliament permits questions to be placed on notice several hours prior to question time. 

The lead question is known allowing the government to prepare for the answer, but this is then followed by a several ‘supplementary questions’ that are relevant to the first question and are spontaneous. 

In addition the NZ Parliament has a Speaker who has the power (and the will) to sit ministers down if they are not being relevant or they have gone on for too long.

Senator Ferguson should be commended for his work but more still he should be listened to. 

Malcolm Turnbull has made the first step in engaging in a process to fix the broken practices of Question time by promising to limit answers to four minutes when we are elected to government.

But for it to continue to work, this generation of leaders must take responsibility to make changes in good faith, even if that means it will remove an advantage the current government or future governments have.

Before KRudd became Prime Minister he promised to clean up the practices in Parliament and the Speaker of the House consistently says he would support change (who could blame the poor guy!).  As a true believe in the value of the Parliament, I believe we should change.

This is change we can all believe in!

Over to you Albo.

Most commented

16 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Old Clive says:

      07:41am | 24/09/09

      Don’t hold your breath!!!!!!

    • Patrick says:

      07:45am | 24/09/09

      I note that you are a member of the Liberal party and an MP in the House of Reps. I also note that this piece isn’t (as much of) blinkered and partisan trash and spin like the pieces some of your colleagues post on here. I agree with most of the sentiments here, But having watched a great deal of question times during the tenure of of the previous government I think they where much worse in abusing question time, especially with the dixers.

      That doesn’t excuse this government from doing the same, but it is important to note that question time has been abused by the government of the day since time immemorial.

    • John M says:

      08:35am | 24/09/09

      Yep sure needs to change whether the previous Government was just as bad as this Government rah rah rah which it probably was really doesn’t matter anymore. They need to change the way it runs as Rudd promised to do before the last election.

    • Wayne says:

      08:44am | 24/09/09

      They did, we did… Who gives a flying f***. The issue is that question time is broken and needs a complete overhaul. This “speaker of the House” has lost control and should be made to reread standing orders again from front to back.  I watch this blatant waste of tax payers dollars every chance I get but it is going to give me a stroke if things don’t change.  Reminds me of when I was a kid and my mum would be screaming at the wrestlers on telly on a Sunday morning. That’s now me during question time but I am screaming at the speaker. I wan’t to hear questions answered. I don’t care what the Speaker want’s! I don’t care what Albanese want’s! I am an Australian tax payer and I wan’t my Government taken to task. Gillard, please answer a question and Mr Speaker, if she does not then sit her ar** down until she is prepared to do so. This is the only opportunity for the people to ensure our Government is acting in the interest’s of the people. Think this is a democracy? The only democratic thing is we vote them in but from that time on it is a dictatorship. Doesn’t matter what we wan’t. Defend Question time and demand it be remade relevant. It plays a very important role and is now nothing more than a joke from both side’s of politics.

    • Neil says:

      10:20am | 24/09/09

      The Government acts like a dictatorship in question time, I know this won;t be popular but Turnbull appears more professional and statesman like than Rudd does during QT, even if his questions are on the lite side of things. Rudds egomaniac, gloating, condescending and accusing attitude really shows us his real character.

    • Marcus says:

      11:15am | 24/09/09

      Having watched a lot of question time in the last 15 years, I can say that despite multiple changes of Governments, nothing much has changed.  The previous Government also “abused” question time.  And Howard’s one word answers to complex questions were equally condescending and egomaniacal as Rudd’s long winded essays.  And no one can touch Costello for being gloating.  Question Time makes intelligent, articulate people behave like brain damaged idiots.  Obviously there is no change for some people (Wilson Tuckey for example) but for most of you it’s an embarrassing circus and complaining that “the other lot” are worse is the kind of excuse I expect from school children.   

      Jamie, it’s your colleagues that are responsible for their behaviour in the chamber.  Perhaps you should stop with the interjections as well and lead by example.  You’re right; Question Time must be improved, but frankly so must the behaviour of both sides of politics.

    • pc says:

      11:28am | 24/09/09

      The honorouble member for mayo clearly does not often read the punch. “Most people would be unaware that the Question time is governed by ‘standing orders’ that are set by the Parliament.  The Speaker of the House is the umpire of these rules.”

      Many times this has been mentioned in this place, and just as many times someone has mentioned the continuity of standing orders from the last government to this one. Rather than addressing one of the many issues confronting Australians, the member for mayo would rather discuss his professional problems. He doesnt know how to do his job. Its not entirely his fault though, before Malcolm Turnbull bravely jetted off to London to make notes on David Camerons conservative campaign (couldn’t you think of it yourself malcolm?) I imagine he gave the party a rousing speech.
      “We must convince the public we are sincere, by being insincere. We must convince the public we are honest by being dishonest and me must convince the public we have policy by flat out refusing to produce any.”

      So while the Ruddbott is in New York, confronting the multiple challenges that face us - one of the signal being a treaty on climate change - Malcolm can only make it more difficult by demonstrating his bad faith by not producing ets amendments or an alternative policy before Copenhagen. On Lateline last night ALL HE talked about was the Ruddbott. We know about the Ruddbott, guys. What about your policy - or is your answer to climate change and further stimulus policy a different question time procedure?

    • SteveB says:

      11:42am | 24/09/09

      I suggest that step 1 should be appointing a speaker from outside the Parliament.
      Appointing a member of the governing party to be the supposedly ‘impartial’ umpire is always going to look like a conflict of interest and in politics the appearance of a conflict is as damaging as a real conflict.

    • Peter H says:

      11:46am | 24/09/09

      James - QT would vastly improve if the Opposition stopped jumping up and down every 5 seconds and if the junior Shadow front bench stopped acting like kindergarten kids (I’ve been there and seen how they fidget, chatter and giggle).

      The current Speaker is a vast improvement on the speakers throughout the 12 years of the previous government.  Believe me I watched every session and am well qualified to know.  Speaker Jenkins has tried to be fair in giving the Opposition POOs but I think the time has come for him to sit you all down before you start.  We may then get through questions more quickly. 

      A less rowdy, rude and disrespectful Opposition may make a big difference.

      We may feel a little pain for the Opposition when they begin to realise that they are not in Government.  The jealousy and envy of Kevin Rudd exhibited by your side is embarrassing.   

      Time to grow up and become adults.  False emails, false accusations, blatant lies about policies and deningration of the Prime Minister at every turn do your side no good,James.

      It’s not only your attitude in QT that needs to change.

    • pete says:

      01:14pm | 24/09/09

      pots calling the kettles black I think you are all as bad as each other. 

      While ever you have all that egotism in the one room, you havent got a hope, notice I was not gender specific.  I did have a glimmer of hope when the present government came into being and that they gave a firm undertaking to behave/ repair/ lift their game etc etc in question time, but then hopes dashed, you all give firm undertakings dont you, regatrdless of gender or party.

      Onto other things I particularily liked the deafening silence form all sides today, after having your printing allowance chopped a bit,  voila you all get this payrise out of the blue, funny that.  Yuri Geller would have been proud of all of you.

      Notice the heavy cynicism in all these comments.I still believe parliamentarians should have performanced based pay agreements, but that migh become embarrasing when you all start busking for pocket money outside the Canberrra Centre

    • DJG says:

      01:46pm | 24/09/09

      This was a laughable piece from a very junior opposition member. It is not just question time were appalling behaviour takes place. Who remembers the ridiculous carry on from this oppossition when the now Govt. tried to extend sitting weeks to include the Friday. They in industrial terms, had bans, walkouts, go slows and sabotage. From the mob who had imposed Workchoices it was rather funny. Under there own work place laws they should have been instantly dismissed. Jamie your side gloated and exploited every inch of the way for eleven long years. It was not ok then and its not ok now. However get used to it, you arrived at the wrong time. If Hawke/Keating did thirteen years, just think what this more talented and politically savvy gang of Ruddbots are going to do. Fifteen years? Perhaps you could take a leaf from your predeccesor and go to lunch during question time.

    • DJ says:

      02:03pm | 24/09/09

      They alredy have questions on notice, infact it’s called Question on Notice, what would be better would be if we had a non partisan speaker elected by two thirds majority of the house

    • Haven Maven says:

      03:02pm | 24/09/09

      Question time? I thought it was the end bit on Jerry Springer when the audience get to savage the guests….

    • Mr Speaker says:

      03:45pm | 24/09/09

      Order, Order!! Will the Member for Mayo return to his seat, he is making a valid point.

      Q) Who am I?
      I represent an electorate in the parliament but I only cast a vote when the vote is tied.
      I am a member of the political party with the majority in the House but I am supposedly impartial.
      I have a lot to say during Question Time but nothing to contribute to the debates.

      A) I am the Honourable Mr Speaker.

    • Benjamin G says:

      10:24pm | 24/09/09

      Very good article Jamie. I agree with you. What is an Opposition suppose to do? It is a difficult position to be in no matter what side of politics you may be on. Question Time is always dominated by the Government of the day, no doubt - it is no longer an appropriate forum to hold Governments to account, which of course is its purpose. The poor old Opposition get in trouble for interjecting, but if they do not interject and raise points of order, the Ministers are able to waffle on endlessly and do nothing but hurl insults at Opposition members. The one that annoys me is the Treasurer calling Joe Hockey “Sloppy Joe.” Surely that is out of line. And for people who say the current Opposition is rowdy and rude should take a look back to when Julia Gillard, Mark Latham and Albo were in the same position. You could not hear Howard or Costello speak without hearing Gillard in particular, interjecting.

    • Shaun says:

      08:38am | 25/09/09

      DJG: Did you actually read WorkChoices? No-one could get dismissed for taking industrial action. Check your facts.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

@ajbau @mcilveenl The latest Nielsen Answers survey. 2,872,000 readers for April. Number one by 53k on the next - Ninemsn, Yahoo7, @SMH.

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @mcilveenl: http://t.co/1Jh1nNcelR Australia's number one news website, according to latest survey. http://t.co/ZRCmNMDN35

Daniel Piotrowski

@ajbau @newscomauHQ More than everywhere else.

tory_maguire

Go @newscomauHQ!! http://t.co/cqclJ0oqrl

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter