It is regrettable that the Gillard Labor government didn’t bear in mind the theme of this year’s National Families Week when framing its Budget. The theme of the week is “Sticking Together – families in good times and tough times.”

Tricks not treats for families. Pic: AP

The Gillard government will rip $50 million from family support services from the next financial year.

Family Relationship Centres will suffer funding cuts from January 1, 2012. Although the cut to the centres has been delayed until next year, it is estimated that 2,500 families will receive no service or wait up to three months for an initial assessment.

These are families that are likely to end up in family court litigation without early intervention services.

Bizarrely, almost $17 million will be redirected to legal assistance services. The Government is not only ‘robbing Peter to pay Paul’; it seems intent on promoting rather than discouraging costly and emotionally-draining litigation.

Instead of helping families to stick together in good times and tough times, the Gillard government is reducing funding for vital relationship services.

Services which already have long and growing waiting lists will have reduced ability to meet the demand. These are the very services which help families stick together.

Hidden away in the measures is a decision to charge families earning more than $50,000 after the first hour of attendance at a Family Relationship Centre.

In addition, marriage counselling services will have their funds cut from July 1.

Research has shown that as much as seven dollars is saved for every dollar spent on marriage counselling. An Australian Institute of Family Studies survey found that of those who were in an intact relationship, 81 per cent of women and 78 per cent of men remained together as a result of counselling.

Of those who were initially separated, 30 per cent of women and 11 per cent of men had reconciled. Three-quarters said their problem areas, personal life and relationships had improved.

A later study supported the findings, but reported that only an estimated 34 per cent of the need for counselling was being met; hence the expansion of funding and services by the Howard Government.

On top of this, funding for the AIFS being slashed.

While cost of living pressures increase, the Family Tax Benefit supplements are being frozen, hitting many Australian families.

The Gillard government’s decision to slash funding of family relationship services stands in stark contrast to the Coalition policy to increase funding.

It is Coalition policy to provide a $200 voucher to couples getting married that can be utilised on a marriage education, counselling or parenting program. This will potentially assist up to 115,000 couples per year (according to ABS data) and will be in addition to the funding already provided to family relationship agencies.

How can Labor claim to support families when it is penalising some of the most vulnerable?

62 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Erick says:

      05:43am | 19/05/11

      The Labor Party is pro-feminist. As such, it regards divorce as a desirable outcome, not one to be avoided. This goes back to the Whitlam government, which introduced the Family Court and no-fault divorce.

      Even now the Labor government is planning amendments to family law that would make it easier to separate men from their own children, and promote false accusations in court.

      Anyone who cares for the integrity of families and the well-being of children should vote against the ALP.

    • Christian Real says:

      06:58am | 19/05/11

      Erick
      Kevin Andrews obviously didn’t care about the integrity of families or the well being of children when he,as immigration Minister under the previous Liberal government, falsely arrested and imprisoned Dr Haneef, not only depriving a innocent man of his liberty, but depriving an innocent man from being with his wife and children and also costing an innocent man his job at the Gold Coast Hospital where he worked.

    • Christian Real says:

      08:15am | 19/05/11

      Erick says:
      “Even now the Labor Government is planning amendments to family law that would make it easier to seperate men from their children,and promote false accusations in court”
      Erick you are way behind the times, Kevin Andrews has already done all of that when, as immigration Minister under the former Howard Liberal Government, he falsely accused Dr Haneef of Terrorism, and seperated Dr Haneef from his children and family by falsely imprisoning Dr Haneef and revoking his visa on trumped up charges or terrorism.

    • Erick says:

      08:32am | 19/05/11

      Christian Real - Not satisfied with bringing up the same irrelevant issue just once, you’ve spammed it three times in this thread!

      Looks like desperation to me. How are those polls going?

    • The Galah from Hervey Bay says:

      09:19am | 19/05/11

      Christian , the needle seems to be stuck in the record - and worse , the repeated lines sound like a chimpanzee on speed.
      Family Tax Benefits are being frozen - the working man’s party in action.
      But oh boy !  the biggest doozy of all - the carbon tax all over our daily cost of living - the flow-on effect will be horrendous . !
      The Prime Minister Mr. Bob Brown has lots more plans for Australian families while Deputy Prime Minister Juliar Gillard will implement his grand schemes .

    • Sarah says:

      09:20am | 19/05/11

      Erick - a bit bored by your “women screw men over constantly” rhetoric. On the flip side, any of your comments that actually don’t have anti-feminist rhetoric in them are generally well thought out and make good sense.

    • Erick says:

      10:25am | 19/05/11

      Sarah, perhaps you wouldn’t have that problem if you read what I actually say, as opposed to what you imagine I’m saying.

      For example, in my comment above, I allude to feminists and the government screwing men over. Not “women”. They are not the same thing.

    • Rose says:

      10:30am | 19/05/11

      Erick, you may be sick of Christian repeating the same theme over and over (pot, kettle, black???), but Christian is right. The Howard government’s treatment of Haneef was appalling and unforgivable, and Kevin Andrews     holds most of the blame!

    • Pete says:

      12:48pm | 19/05/11

      you are a bit of a broken record yourself Erick, you have obviously not gotten over a very traumatic episode in your life. I hope you find a bit of peace

    • Erick says:

      01:08pm | 19/05/11

      @Pete - Like Sarah, you are making false assumptions and not reading what I actually write. Your preconceptions and prejudices lead you astray.

      I will continue to expose and criticise injustices in our society, regardless of your mistaken imagination.

    • The Galah from Hervey Bay says:

      01:22pm | 19/05/11

      Rose :  Just a minor detail ( for your info. ) KevinAndrews acted on intelligence supplied to him from the A.F.P. and other sourses.
      It’s well in the past now and the matter dealt with .
      Tell us Rose , what’s your take on the Brown/Gil liar d govt’s handling of illegal boat arrivals. ?

    • Rose says:

      01:34pm | 19/05/11

      Galah, I’m disgusted in the Malaysian solution,it is inhumane, inappropriate and a betrayal of all who voted Labor.That Gillard went even lower than Abbott & co in its response to the still very low numbers of asylum seekers arriving in Australia is unforgivable.  Australian politics commenced its downward spiral with Howard, most obviously when he deliberately lied about the children overboard, and it won’t improve until we see the back of most of the current mob of politicians.
      As for Andrews, if you believe he didn’t know he was sacrificing an innocent man you are a fool!

    • Kevin says:

      02:20pm | 19/05/11

      “Of those who were initially separated, 30 per cent of women and 11 per cent of men had reconciled.”
      Ummm ... assuming we’re talking about straight couples, how do those figures stack up?

    • The Galah from Hervey Bay says:

      06:03pm | 19/05/11

      Rose :  .........so you think the boats should just be allowed to keep coming , the taxpayer should keep paying the bills , providing five star accommodation to illegals .
      The Pacific Solution actually stopped the boats Rose - was abandoned by Labor and we are back to square one. Credit where it’s due , John Howard did the job , got things done - that’s what the electorate wanted and still wants.
      Your irrational tirade against Kevin Andrews is unbelievable - why in the name of common sense , would a Minister ever want to deliberately sacrifice an innocent man .  ?
      If you really are trying to claim that as a fact , i strongly suggest it is you who are a fool.

    • Christian Real says:

      10:28pm | 19/05/11

      The galah from hervey bay
      You never know Galah, I might even run into you sometimes, as I live in the Hervey Bay area also, and I must add that you have certainly picked an appropriate name for yourself.

    • Unionist says:

      06:16am | 19/05/11

      Unfortunately Mr Andrews the terroist slayer… chuckle… chuckle. Your side of politics likes to treat the electorate as if they were the pumpkin people in the picture in your submission above. The reality is all we hear from you is Blah… Blah… Blah…

    • The Galah from Hervey Bay says:

      08:40pm | 19/05/11

      Unionist :  How about the faceless P.M. slayers from Sussex St. - your side of politics likes to treat the electorate as if they were idiots . How long before the political assassins put the political knife into Gillard , after all , she has made a bigger mess than Rudd and the electorate has ticked the fail column . This federal govt. hasn’t just lost it’s way , it was never on the right path in the first place.

    • Christian Real says:

      06:49am | 19/05/11

      Kevin Andrews
      You have a poor memory,and you have the blatant audacity to critize this current Government over their budget that may affect middle class families earning a combined $150,000 or more a year.
      Kevin Andrews, you should be the last pesrdon to talk, after you ripped apart Dr Haneef’s family by falsely imprisoning him on trumped up charges of terrorism and depriving his wife of a husband and their children of a father.
      Kevin Andrews,you even went to the extreme of revoking Dr Haneef’s visa, even though you knew that you were wrong to do so.
      And even after the Director of Public Prosecutions had dropped all charges against Dr Haneef you still continued to refuse to re-instate his visa.
      Even your paltry and weak excuse that you used to attempt to justify your reasons for refusing to re-instate Dr Haneef’s visa was rejected in the Federal Court.
      Kevin Andrews, you are unfit to talk about families given your previous history as Immigration Minister and you should have stood down and resigned long ago .

    • Bunk says:

      01:08pm | 19/05/11

      No one gives a toss about Dr Haneef, get over it.

    • Christian Real says:

      07:28am | 20/05/11

      Bunk says:
      “No one gives a toss about Dr Haneef,get over it”
      The only ones that “don’t give a toss” as you say are the liberal party and their radical supporters and clone like followers, who condoned imprisonment of an innocent man, deprived him of his family,and his work as a doctor in a Gold Coast Hospital.
      By composing this blog, Kevin andrews has clearly shown that he is a hypocrite by attacking the current government, when as Minister for Immigration he clearly didn’t give a toss about Dr Haneef or his family when he trumped up charges of terrorism and revoked his visa even after the Director of Public prosecutions had dropped all charges.
      The current Leader of the Opposition, Tony Abbott was also part of that Howard Liberal Government and he also condoned this act of falsely detaining an innocent man,depriving him of his liberty, his family,friends and his work on these trumped up charges of terrorism.
      This is what former Liberal Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser had to say in a story “Nazi tones in Howard’s anti-terror laws.” in   “The Canberra Times”, on Wednesday,2 November,2005.
      “Former Liberal prime minister Malcolm Fraser has suggested parts of the Howard Government’s anti-terror package resemble measures taken by Adolf Hitler and says Kim Beasley’s handling of opposition to the package should determine his leadership.”
      In another paragraphs he says:
      “Some of the legislation is truly terrible,”  he said, “some of the analogies…one of the first pieces of legislation Hitler’s government put into place was something for ‘the good order and safety’ of the citizens of Germany: preventive detention…
      “Some parts of the [ Australian} legislation sound horribly familiar.”
      “He added preventive detention,under which suspects could not contact their families nor their employers, “seems effectively to be a law to make somebody disapear”. “I think that’s an odd law for a country like Australia Mr Fraser said.”
      Bunk:
      You ask who gives a toss?
      Australian people that was raised on respect, integrity and honesty gives a toss .

    • thatmosis says:

      07:32am | 19/05/11

      And Unionist your side of politics ikes to treat peo[ple as jokes. They will not listen to th majority or take any advice from anyone, they blatantly lie to the people time and rime again to keep office, they make deals with parties that they rally object to just to stay in power and deliver nothing but grief and higher taxes in return. Get a grip and stop smoking the silly weed and have a good look at what this Government has done to the quality of life of the average Australian and then try and justify their existance. This government makes the Whitlasm Government look good???

    • Eugene says:

      07:35am | 19/05/11

      So this is the compassionate face of new Labor - seems working families have been forgotten in Julia’s new paradigm! Get real Christian, prejudice seems to have displaced your response to the article. How many pink batts, cash for clunkers, overpriced school halls etc would have paid for these family services? Just like Labor, you have decided to attack the Opposition, rather than defend the Budget.

    • Christian Real says:

      08:41am | 19/05/11

      Eugene
      Shcool hall will pay for themselves regardsless of the liberal catcry that they were overprice.
      The value of these new buildings will be reimbused by the generations of children that will be able to use and be benefited by these hall and other school infastructure for many generations of years to come.
      Schools, roads and other vital infastructure that was ‘forgotten’ under the previous Liberal government will serve generations of families children.
      I place the value on the children that will reap the benefits of having these new halls and libraries to work and learn in, not on what the halls and liberaries cost.
      Money well spent,as these infastructure will be used by many generations of children over many years to come.
      As for the pink batts, I am happy with the ones installed in our roof, and it was only unfortunate that some of tose that employed people to put batts into peoples roofs did not train them in the proper manner,and it is people like your with your head firmly up the Liberal party’s arse that can’t see the daylight for the trees

    • nossy says:

      07:46am | 19/05/11

      Kevin your a nice chap but I have a word for you from the past that “really” helped families “Workchoices” - remember that one Kev ?

    • R says:

      10:40am | 19/05/11

      ............or ripping $1bn from the health budget, First Home Owner’s Grant which increased house prices to the point where it is increasingly difficult for people to break into the property market, wars which have killed countless people, immigration detention, the Intervention, minimum infrastructure investment including allowing schools to become increasingly run down, changing the marriage act to disallow ACT’s same sex marriage bill. Basically Howard and co attacked families left right and centre, so for Andrews’ to attack Gillard is a joke. Throwing money at people in middle-class welfare does not make up for Howard’s complete lack of structural reform.
      I don’t agree with a lot that Gillard and co are doing, but for any member of the Howard government   to attack them on commitment to family is an absolute joke, hypocrisy at it’s best!

    • dale says:

      08:00am | 19/05/11

      This service is not what a government is for!

      The government is meant to use tax dollars for vital services, police doctors nurses and infrastructure, roads rail telecommunications.

      I am so sick of subsidising this crap!

    • Pot Stirrer says:

      08:38am | 19/05/11

      If that’s the best you critics can come up with by mentioning the past of Haneef and Work Choices, you’ve clearly missed the point of this article. How about actually trying to stay on point about by agreeing or disagreeing with criticism on the budget.

    • PTom says:

      10:53am | 19/05/11

      You mean don’t use Liberal tactics against Liberals.

    • Tubesteak says:

      08:48am | 19/05/11

      Where is Against the Man on this topic because I will put this down as one of the 8 things Gillard has done that is a good thing.

      It’s not up to the gubbermint to make your life happy so I’m very happy that they are no longer wasting money on this and charging families for the privilege of having counselling.

      Now if only we could abolish all the useless other handouts families get for no productive purpose we’d be on a good track.

    • Against the Man says:

      09:12am | 19/05/11

      I’m here and have posted a reply already. Nice try Tubesteak with the one of 8 things Gilltard has done good smile

      Quick let the public know because poll numbers are dropping !!!!!!!!!!!!

      I was watching Sky news this morning and it looks like the lack of details has prevented Malaysia from signing on the dotted lines and we have asylum seekers in limbo. I see a legal battle brewing with taxpayer dollars hitting the waste bin hard.

      If this is one of those ‘good’ things that Gilltard is responsible for, God help us with the NBN cock up!

      This government is finished one way of the other, the public has had enough and they will be zero forgiveness!

      Too sweet! Too sweet indeed smile

    • Tubesteak says:

      11:42am | 19/05/11

      Yours wasn’t up when I wrote this, obviously. But I see it now.

      You have to admit, though, that is is clearly a great policy/move by Labor.

      Who care about the polls. Wait for an election as you said and see what happens then in 2013.

      Another good thing Labor has done is the reform of the MIT industry.

      Also reduction in withholding tax rates on certain items of income.

    • Against the Man says:

      07:00pm | 19/05/11

      Tubesteak you are gonna be my best mate!

      I agree with you. Who cares about the polls? Nobody right?

      Yes, the ALP keeps up with this level of performance and Gilltard counts down to her $600, 000 per year pension obtainable in June…....

      I’m hoping the polls don’t bother the ALP, and continue the way they are.

      Really I couldn’t ask for anything more.

    • Against the Man says:

      09:00am | 19/05/11

      Oh guys, just store up your anger against the ALP and unleash it at the right time. The poll numbers represent lots of dissatisfaction with the ALP, once the carbon tax is unleashed things are going to get sweeter.

      Oh union bosses, please don’t forget to keep up the atttack against Gilltard/Brown’s carbon tax policy!

      HaHaHa, the dumbest government in Australian history!

      ps: Hey Ruddy you still sitting back or going to man up and get Gilltard?

    • Tim says:

      09:02am | 19/05/11

      How about just for once, the government stayed out of people’s private lives?
      Providing vouchers for newly married couples to get counselling, what a joke.
      The government hasn’t done the right thing here… not because they haven’t given the extra funding but because they haven’t cut enough of these completely wasteful programs.

    • Janey says:

      07:18pm | 19/05/11

      vouchers, set top boxes, what’s the difference?

    • Damian Parkhill says:

      09:39am | 19/05/11

      Sorry, but I have no sympathy for families on $150k a year, having children is a choice - not a requirement like the backward thinking liberals would have us all believe.

      Also I hate them being portrayed as battlers, as a single male expected to live on $40k a year wages as a qualified trades person, hearing about how poor they are makes me want to punch kittens.

    • Tim says:

      09:58am | 19/05/11

      Yep I agree,
      If you can survive on $40K a year why can’t a family survive on say $80K a year?
      The limit of $150K for benefits is far too high and should have been slashed.

    • KH says:

      10:05am | 19/05/11

      Exactly - the median income in this country is under $60k per annum.  $150k is a hell of a lot of money.  Maybe less 4WDs and inner city houses that are massively overpriced, and they wouldn’t need all the handouts.  This is part of the problem - all these handouts mean others just charge more for services or housing, knowing that many people are getting additional funds from handouts to cover it.  People complaining about this need to have a long hard look at themselves - just about any family should be able to live on $150k comfortably.  Have a look at where your expenditure is going - if its on private school fees and the like, then tough. if its on ‘essentials’ then you are doing something very wrong.  Learn to live within your means.

    • fairsfair says:

      10:19am | 19/05/11

      punch kittens? lol… sorry, allow me to regroup….

      I completely agree. I earn significantly less than half of my brother and SIL’s household, but according to my parents and the greater world, they are worse off than me. Our mortgages are the same, I still have to pay for services, same amount of rates, insurance etc etc - but because they have spawned a child (and just the one) - they deserve all the help in the world. They are “struggling” so that equates to just dropping a few bags of groceries over to them on the odd occasion. Where are my god damned groceries mum!?!?!?

      This perception of a two income household with children doing it harder than a single income household with no kids is laughable. We should all be on a level playing field - ie nothing.

    • RyaN says:

      10:44am | 19/05/11

      @Damian Parkhill: couldn’t agree more, except that it appears that households with two parents earning 75k each are not paying the same amount of tax as a household with two parents where one is earning 150k. What is clear is that any government wanting to be fair to families and at the same time reduce the cost of administering family tax benefit part B would immediately scrap the family tax benefit part B and instead allow legally recognised couples to be taxed as a couple.

    • James1 says:

      10:46am | 19/05/11

      Coming from a two income, single child household, I agree 100% with fairs.  While our combined income is below $150000 a year, we are not struggling by any conception of the word.  I really don’t understand how anyone earning anywhere close to what we do thinks they are struggling.  In fact, I think that such people are probably pretty irresponsible, and just don’t know how to handle money.

    • fairsfair says:

      11:06am | 19/05/11

      True James. But you see paying of a Prado and a Crewman while planning the extension for the media/playroom and saving for the New York Christmas in 2012 is difficult. If they choose to lead a lifestyle like that good luck to them but I could have kicked my brother in the nuts when he expressed his horror at the budget and cracked out his tiny violin that played woe is me.

      It is this perception of being a “battler” that is the issue. They aren’t battling, but apparently they are supposed to be so they spew out the well rehersed lies on a daily basis, to the point where they now believe it to be true.

      I don’t lead a flush lifestyle by any stretch of the word, but I have a roof over my head and dinner on my plate. Until that has disappeared I don’t think I’ll be turning to anyone else for help.

    • RyaN says:

      11:25am | 19/05/11

      @James1: but you are a two income household paying so much less tax than your neighbour household who may have a personal income higher than yours yet has two or three kids and pays far more tax than your combined tax contribution.

      The real stickler is that when people are means tested they are means tested on a combined income, yet taxed as individuals.

      I am sure that any single income household will happily forgo their family tax benefit part B to be taxed as a couple.

    • James1 says:

      12:21pm | 19/05/11

      Without doubt, RyaN, those sorts of structural tax inequalities need to be dealt with and fixed.  I would certainly not dispute that.

      I would, however, dispute that anyone earning as much or more than my household is struggling financially, unless as fairs identifies they have brought that struggle on themselves through conspicuous consumption.

    • RyaN says:

      01:17pm | 19/05/11

      @James1: 100% agree, as long as you are living in Sydney.
      I mean if you have disposable income, you certainly aren’t on struggle street are you?

    • Tchom says:

      10:12am | 19/05/11

      Screw families!. Do people even have those anymore? Not like my girlfriend and I will ever be able to AFFORD to start a family in this country. Thank you, negative gearing, for ensuring we will never own a house in this country. How about the government stops trying to engineer families with incentives and rebates, and just looks after the general well-being of Australians so families can start by themselves?

    • RyaN says:

      11:30am | 19/05/11

      Apparently you have to sell your soul to the banks and your ass to the government, this is the legacy of a socialist / communist government under Gillard.

    • Pete says:

      10:41am | 19/05/11

      ok we got the negativites Kevin, but where are the alternative directions, vision and policies?????????????? 
      People dont vote for you unless they know you stand for something other than NO.  Get rid of him and put in Malcolm and then watch your poll results.

    • KH says:

      11:25am | 19/05/11

      I think that is the worst part of what we have in Parliament today - its all very well to bash the policies of the government, but they don’t seem to be offering one policy in response - just negative crap.  They are even against good things - like reducing middle class welfare.  How they can justify being against that is a mystery to me.  I suppose they are hoping to be voted in without ever having to make one promise or election policy - then they can claim a ‘mandate’ for just about anything.  I can’t see how that is a good alternative - Ive said it before - voting for a party with no policies is like handing a signed blank cheque to a stranger and getting them to fill in the amount…..........

    • St. Michael says:

      11:59am | 19/05/11

      @ KH: See Lindsay Tanner’s book for the full story about why this is so.  If politicians thought they could actually get a coherent message out there without it being twisted or turned into a soundbyte by the media, they probably wouldn’t be so scared to stick their heads up over the trenchline.  This is one of the curses of living in a 24/7 media world.

      Setting up a policy at any time more than 6 weeks before an election only gives the other side more time to find a cardboard-cutout expert to stand up and proclaim shrilly all the problems with the policy.  Hell, you can even find academic morons out there who still believe running deficits in a crisis is actually a good thing to do without then raising taxes in boom periods to pay it off.

      On the other hand, it’s my firm view you can’t trust any of the political class, because just as we (or the middle class, anyway) are getting more addicted to government welfare as America is, politicians are more and more interested only in power and holding it than serving this country’s longterm interests.  They are only interested in the next election and in buying people’s votes, not in persuading of a longterm vision of Australia.

      I do not believe anyone who willingly offers themselves for political service in this country, knowing the immense spotlight it brings with it and knowing what it takes to get and hold power—factionalism—can be primarily motivated by anything less than a desire for power driven by serious psychological issues.  Of the last 30-odd years of PMs we’ve seen, Menzies was the last one who impressed me as having any real sense of service to the country without real interest in the power as such.  I trust neither Liberals nor Labor in the present day.

      Turnbull I am inclined to ascribe slightly more competence to on his record since he’s a self-made millionaire, but at the same time he strikes me as a sort of Liberal form of Gough Whitlam - he doesn’t quite fit in with the traditional picture of his own party, which is only going to end in tears later on.

    • Markus says:

      04:30pm | 19/05/11

      So true, St Michael.
      But it makes me think that we just need a politician that has the cojones to call out the media on their rubbish.

      Everyone knows that journos are bottom-feeding scum with zero morals.
      I just get the feeling that the first politician that has the balls to publicly proclaim it would get huge support from a lot of the voting populous.

      What would Keating do? smile

    • Good Government says:

      11:23am | 19/05/11

      Sorry Kevin
      Is this the budget reply speech Abbott forgot to give?

    • Valerie Woodruffe says:

      11:38am | 19/05/11

      If you are a family on $150,000 a year you are lucky, I’m dependant on a welfare pension and have to rely on centrelink, $150,000 a year is just a dream for me, these families should quit whinging they dont know when they are well off

    • Cam says:

      11:43am | 19/05/11

      But there’s plenty of money to spend on mental health for refugees ... and health and dental and housing and welfare and legal aid to sue us if we don’t provide the above .....

    • Deeman says:

      12:01pm | 19/05/11

      Why should my tax dollars go to supporting families. I am sick and tired of wealthy families getting my tax dollars. The liberals take from the poor to give to the middle class

    • Shane from Melbourne says:

      12:27pm | 19/05/11

      I looked for one mention of singles and childless couples in Kevin Andrews little essay. Apparently as voters and taxpayers we don’t count. I’m long resigned to be a second class citizen when measured against the family unit, but it would be nice to get a mention every now and again.

    • Damian Parkhill says:

      12:56pm | 19/05/11

      @Shane

      He doesn’t mention or count us because we’re not breeding the next round of slave labor (aka under 18’s) or people for him to brainwash into becoming good little liberal voters!

    • stephen says:

      03:44pm | 19/05/11

      J. Howard’s baby bonus was an attempt at social engineering in that he expected a jump in white people having babies, assuming that migrants and newer arrivals would conceive anyway, because that’s why they came here right…to start a new life ?
      Same with this little package.
      It’s based on the moronic assumption that the family unit is inherently more stable than the marginalized ; therefore it deserves much more governmental intervention because high marriage breakdowns and single-parent families are a burden on everyone else.

      (I’d like to go on forever with this line of thinking, but suffice to round off with a capitalist slogan ditty : User Pays.)

    • Dallas Beaufort says:

      12:48pm | 19/05/11

      After 20 odd years of green labor state governments and their councils using regulation to inflate house prices through their social engineering models these same pea brains now increase all costs and add a fraudulent CO2 tax at the same time that home values are correcting. What a bunch of missing link climate change convicts.

    • Rose says:

      02:20pm | 19/05/11

      Howard’s first home owners grant is the main reason house prices are so high.

    • sam says:

      03:33pm | 19/05/11

      i see you poms are whining still about it

    • Dallas Beaufort says:

      09:59pm | 19/05/11

      5th generation Australian, Dishlick.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

This concern for Thomson won’t change the script

This concern for Thomson won’t change the script

Under pressure himself over his crusade against Craig Thomson, Tony Abbott has moved to present a softer…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter