There’s been a curious role reversal between Channel 10 and Channel Nine in the past 5 years or so, made even more compelling with James Packer’s new 18 percent stake in 10.

George Negus can tell his Ten colleagues about working for a Packer. Picture: Sam Ruttyn

The networks used to be opposites of the TV spectrum – Nine the heavy-weights in both budget and exposure – Ten the cut-price youngsters.  Nine had a stable of headline stars. Ten was a quiet achiever. Nine had a formidable newsroom of senior journalists. Ten had a bunch of bright, hungry 20-somethings.

Then they started morphing into each other. Nine began carving away the newsroom budget, chunk by chunk. A lot of fat was shed, then a bit more. Young, ambitious 20-somethings started to feature in the 6pm line up. The tone changed from stable, solid (and sometimes predictable) to a more American, flashy, invigorated product.

At Ten, the news team matured. You even see some of Channel 9’s old stars like Hugh Riminton on the road. And then the Network, which had made its fortunes attracting young audiences, did a very old “Nine” thing – and announced a whopping $20 million investment in news programming and 100 extra jobs.

Another former Nine star George Negus was acquired to front a 6pm national news service that would appeal to an older demographic - a traditionally Nine demographic.

Behind the scenes -Nine’s former Sydney News Director Tony Ritchie and another senior Nine newsman, Ray Dale, have been helping pull it all together.

It’s all been rubber stamped, of course, by Ten Network Chief and former Channel Nine executive Nick Falloon, via parent company PBL. The investment and planning has been more than a year in the making. But, if industry rumours are to be believed, it could all be over before it starts.

Enter – the biggest name from Nine - James Packer.  Role reversal complete.

The uncertainty in the Channel 10 newsroom right now must be excruciating. Will James Packer, with his newly acquired power in the Network use his boardroom power to oppose a broadening of the news and current affairs programming?

It wouldn’t surprise me, despite denials from inside the Network 10 camp.  James Packer always had an eye on Channel 10 and it was made clear to those of us working at Nine even when we were still “The One”.

Packer made no secret to news bosses that lessons could be learned from Ten’s “cheaper” approach to news and current affairs.  My news managers bemoaned the comparison made by their boss, but you couldn’t argue with the economics.

Ten may not have been a ratings winner, but it was making solid profits off the back of successful cheap buy-ins from the US like The Simpsons. You may not have turned to Ten when the big news broke, but their very watchable 5pm news was popular and profitable.

Ten staff have been latching onto management promises of sticking to the plan, but they must be anxious and more than a few have been asking Nine colleagues, “what’s it like to work for a Packer?”.

The answer depends on which Packer you’re referring to.

Willoughby’s Channel 9 headquarters has always been a ramshackle kind of a place with run down technology and an eclectic bunch of old buildings and cottages. From the outside, it looks far from glamorous, but Kerry Packer had the Cinderella effect. A sprinkle of his TV magic and the place shone – ready for the ball every night.

Back then, in Kerry’s day at the helm of Nine, (both times) it was well noted that most staff were paid less than their counterparts at second placed Seven. Why did we stay? Because we were winners.

Because the parties were better. Because we got a Christmas hamper.

The hamper was probably worth about $200, but it came with a card from Kerry. The loyalty it bought was priceless.  When the great man died we never saw the hampers again.  It upset people more than you can imagine. It was more than losing a hamper. It was what it represented. Nine had lost its shine. Had lost its soul. We were working for a corporation now, not a family.

The changes had come gradually and many under the charge of James Packer, whose hard nosed business sense many underestimate. But the hampers were the final blow.

I’ll take bets they won’t be introduced at 10. Sorry guys. Expect some big picture changes at 10, but not culturally.

Ten staffers wanting a real insiders perspective at what life was like under Nine need look no further than their newest recruit, George Negus. He’s never been sentimental about his former employer and laughs about Channel Nine mythology – tall, expanded stories about a time when TV really was a passion for its owners.

Negus told Gerald Stone in his book Compulsive Viewing that “I always regarded my time at Nine as mutual exploitation. They talk about loyalty all the time, loyalty, loyalty, loyalty. I don’t think they understand the meaning of the word.”

Let’s see what the future holds at the newly merged Channel 19.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Get The Punch on Facebook

22 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Foss says:

      07:50am | 22/10/10

      For James Packer, it’s all about making a dollar to maintain his various boats and stuff the viewers. from a viewer point of view, we would be better off without such greedy buggers. Please come back Kerry Packer. All is forgiven

    • Billy Whiz says:

      07:51am | 22/10/10

      Buying into 10 two days before the large turnaround in profits was announced seems extremely fortuitous, I’ve not heard any mention of this coincidence.

    • Robster says:

      09:09am | 22/10/10

      Yes I too wondered if anyone noticed that…............or rather choose to ignore it!

    • I never said it says:

      10:13am | 22/10/10

      I think powerful litigious lawyers can keep scrutiny at a very comfortable distance.

    • Jim says:

      07:59am | 22/10/10

      I stopped watching free-to-air channels at about the time the Big Brother type shows started polluting it. The only exception is for the NRL.
      I can only hope Ch10 wins the rights and gets rid of idiots like Gould, Voss and Vautin, along with the drug and alcohol addled psuedo-commentators, and brings back Big Dazza.

    • Seano says:

      08:38am | 22/10/10

      No corporation that I worked for over the years knew the meaning of the word loyalty. But they often claimed they did, and it’s amazing at how effective that pretence was in getting people to put up with being mistreated and used. I guess we all want to be loved.

      At the end of the day most coporates see you as a number in a spreedsheet. A “resource” to be used and discarded as needed. I think George was on to something with his “mutual explotation” comment.

    • Shaking Head says:

      09:13am | 22/10/10

      @Seano - was it ever any other way?

    • Seano says:

      11:37am | 22/10/10

      The myth had to start somewhere.

    • Not-So-Blind Willy says:

      10:26am | 23/10/10

      Tell me about your loyalty to the corporations that you worked for over the years Seano. It is a two way street after all, and true loyalty demonstrated by diligent and measurably productive work as well as other qualities, rarely goes unrewarded. Simply showing up at work periodically does not constitute loyalty or reason to retain a “resource”.

    • Anita says:

      09:55am | 22/10/10

      We are all at the mercy of corporate monopolies - banks, newpapers, media, supermarkets and even politics. Our choices are being stripped from us and we don’t seem to have any control over it.

    • marley says:

      07:31pm | 22/10/10

      You’re assuming that we had more choices in the past. We didn’t.

    • AdamC says:

      11:20am | 22/10/10

      Good article, Kellie.

      I have always understood that Kerry loved being a media mogul: feeling powerful and important and just enjoying the nature of the business. Big James seems a little more of a hard-edged businessman. It doesn’t matter what he sells as long as its selling. And what he is selling is more casinos in Asia than TV stations in Oz.

      Personally, I can’t see Packer Jr buying Ten, and therefore imagine the strategy won’t change too much. However, you never know.

    • ibast says:

      12:59pm | 22/10/10

      9 hasn’t changed it’s stripes too much.  It still mostly has stale, middle of the road presenters.  That is still it’s audience.

    • nosthow says:

      01:19pm | 22/10/10

      I cant see why young Packer is wasting his life on such projects when he has so much money . Does he want to end up like daddy who died a multi-billionaire at only age 68 ? Come on James do something good for mankind just like Bill Gates of Microsoft has devoted his life to doing. Channel 10 will rumble along quite peacefully with or without you fella. Man up !

    • Reggieman says:

      01:30pm | 22/10/10

      I worked in News at Nine 18 years ago. Weekly we were threatened that if we stuffed up or were unhappy with our working conditions there were 100 others out there waiting to snap up our jobs. The equipment was ten years behind the equipment of our competitors and always breaking down, the bosses were a**holes, but the journos were great guys and the stuff we did out on the road was a lot of fun for the most part, aside from the shifts at State Parliament or waiting outside the Supreme Court for 8 hours. So why did I stay? Same reason Kellie states - the Christmas parties were awesome and the hampers were amazing. When the hampers stopped my enthusiasm for the place evaporated. Now I look back and wonder why I stuck it out for so long. But hey, I worked for “The One” and there was definitely a certain gravitas attached.

    • Claire says:

      01:59pm | 22/10/10

      I’m just glad the ACC are at least taking a look into the matter of JP buying some of Channel 10. We need more diversity in media in Australia, not less.

    • MJL says:

      02:58pm | 22/10/10

      Put your house on Eddie leaving 9 and going to 10.

    • Sadiq Farris says:

      03:29pm | 22/10/10

      I would give Channel 10 And Channel 9
      9.5 instead of 19.
      Channel 19 is five short of Channel 24 and 80 short of GO

    • Sadiq farris says:

      03:32pm | 22/10/10

      Channel 7 and Channel 10 share AFL Aussie Rules
      Channel 9 has NRL Rugby League and Cricket/
      Just what do Channel 10 and Channel 9 share?

    • SM says:

      03:58pm | 22/10/10

      I used to love those hampers.  Originally introduced when Sir Frank Packer got sick of the male employees spending their xmas (cash) bonuses at the pub, and their families getting nothing. 

      “No more cash, give ‘em food”

    • stephen says:

      06:14pm | 22/10/10

      Diversity in the media comes from technology and who’s got it, which currently is nearly everybody. Hence this letter.

    • Not-So-Blind Willy says:

      10:35am | 23/10/10

      How Australians resent the corporations and the wealthy. Another France in the making.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

This concern for Thomson won’t change the script

This concern for Thomson won’t change the script

Under pressure himself over his crusade against Craig Thomson, Tony Abbott has moved to present a softer…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter