One can’t help but compare the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks to that of a cat with nine lives.

Benjamin Netanyahu - that guy's still there?... Picture: AFP

They seem to die over and over again with no resolution, but how long until their luck runs out, the blood boils over and the Gaza region breaks out in all out war.

Since the establishment of the state of Israel, crisis points have come and gone and the populations of Jewish and Palestinian peoples have found no peace. Unfortunately this time will be no different.

Ongoing problems that seem to repeatedly dog the peace process are the same now as they were when the conflict started well over half a century ago.

A displaced Palestinian population scattered all over the Middle East are desperate to have a home to call their own after being violently forced from their land and homes in 1948.

This now seems like a pipe dream.

Israel now refuses to stop building Jewish settlements on the West Bank, which has resulted in increasingly violent conflict between the clashing populations leading up to the current non-direct peace talks.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu only wants peace if it comes with dominance over the Palestinian people.

According to Netanyahu who spoke on Israeli television earlier this week when asked about the current peace talks going on between the two waring sides:

“It could be we hit a wall, a wall on the topic of Jerusalem, maybe a wall on the subject of (Palestinian) refugees, it could be the result will be an interim agreement.”

We’ve heard this before.

Palestinians swiftly rejected this idea as Israel has made clear over the long process that no concessions will be made.

Israel has long enjoyed the support of the world’s most powerful nation, the United States.

A Palestinian plan to put forward a resolution to the United Nations Security Council that calls on Israel to end the building of settlements on the West Bank was rejected by the American government on Wednesday.

This has effectively ended the life of the proposal due to America’s right to veto as a permanent member of the Security Council.

The first direct peace talks in two years broke down earlier this year again due to Netanyahu’s unwillingness to give an inch. An Israeli freeze on settlement building expired and the Prime Minister, mid-negotiation, refused to put a temporary halt while discussions continued.

Pushed into a corner, Palestinian leaders believed talks could not deliver a lasting agreement as long as Israel continues to undermine Palestine’s existence by building settlements.

Israeli foreign minister Avigder Lieberman, known for his hardline stance, proposed a similar ‘interim peace deal’ with Palestine on Sunday, but went on to say:

“Israel should not negotiate peace with the West Bank regime of Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas”

By stating this, the minister questions the legitimacy of the democratically elected president and therefore undermines the Palestinian people.

Netanyahu, a right wing politician, holds power only by a thread. His coalition is made up of even further right parties that would quickly probably overthrow his position as leader if the idea of giving the Palestinians any land came to fruition.

The fact is this has all happened before. Look back to Netanyahu’s previous stint as Prime Minister from 1996-1999 and the infamous Oslo peace talks. We run into the same stubborn man refusing to make any concessions, however small and proceeding to blame Palestinians for the break down of the peace process.

So how can the peace process forge or even begin without each side looking upon each other as equals? Quite simply it can’t.

50 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      07:43am | 31/12/10

      “Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu only wants peace if it comes with dominance over the Palestinian people.”

      And the Palestinian leaders only want peace if it comes with the expulsion of the Israeli people.

      Your blame game seems a little one-sided.

    • TChong says:

      08:01am | 31/12/10

      Yes Eric, they (the palestinians) want the Israelis off their land, much like any other people would.
      Agree, spread the blame around evenly, including shining a light upon Israel and its use of collective punishments, brutal military control, and its store of nuclear weapons, which of course cant be mentioned, otherwise the default cries of “antisemitism” are used to defend the indefensable actions of Israel.

    • James says:

      08:31am | 31/12/10

      Hey TC, any ideas on what to do with those Israeli people?

    • TChong says:

      09:14am | 31/12/10

      We have an alternative govt that would turn the boats around, maybe the palestinians need a politician who advocates turn the far right nutters-settlers moving vans , with police, army escort around.
      We have issues with boat people, imagine how the palestinians view the israeli sanctioned invasion of their homeland.
      In fact, many conservative pundits would identify with the palestinian cry of letting them ( the pals) decide who arrives in their homeland, and in what manner.

    • Brutus Balan says:

      09:16am | 31/12/10

      Yes TChong, you too have a skewed understanding of Jewish history dated back 3,000 years.  You are not an anti-Semite but simply ignorant. Ignorant of even the recent offers made by previous Israeli PMs to almost all the Arab demands. Ignorant that the so called Palestinians are Jordanian Arabs spilled over to Israel during the British occupation of Jewish land and during their exile.  Ignorant that the so called Palestinians are pawns of the ‘hate Israel campaign’ by Arab nations. Instead of absorbing them into the neighboring state they are left in limbo for so long.  Where is your indignance at the Arabs?  Ignorant that there are no such thing as a Palestinian race or people and it was an invention by the Arabs to oust the Jews off their native land.  You are ignorant TChong !!!

    • Vaunted says:

      09:45am | 31/12/10

      Over 76% of the population of Israeli territory is Jewish by religion, that’s about 5,700,000 people, versus about 1,300,000 Muslims, so I’d say as far as giving Israel back to the Arabs is concerned the horse has well and truly bolted. You may as well say all white folks in Australia go back to where you came from, or for that matter, all you Normans get back to Normandy. The regional Arab population will eventually have little choice but to stop chafing and harassing the Israeli mainstream and capitulate. Is that fair? Probably not, but any well-armed legitimate government (and Israel is UN-sanctioned and well armed) has a right to assert itself in the face of terrorist insurrection, no matter how well-justified some may believe such insurrection to be. In the broad brush of historical reality, apportioning relative ‘blame’ hardly comes into it.

    • Brutus Balan says:

      10:16am | 31/12/10

      Well said Vaunted, “You may as well say all white folks in Australia go back to where you came from, or for that matter, all you Normans get back to Normandy. ”

    • TChong says:

      10:37am | 31/12/10

      Dear Brutus, i think you are playing fast and loose with the truth if you seriosly claim ther we no palestinians in the disputed area.
      Ignorant ? dont know, apologist ? - I hope your not
      Vaunted - palestinians who want the israeli military occupation to end are terrorists are they?
      Then so were the Jews in Warsaw- how dare they disrupt and object to the legitimate occupation of warsaw ( from German POV ) ?
      Outrageous!, theres differences you say?
      Like what?
      To the palestinian children and ambulance drivers shot during the last israeli invasion,by state sanctioned army snipers, they are just as dead as any of the Holocaust victims.
      Israel relies on blaming its victims.

    • Mitch says:

      11:37am | 31/12/10

      Brutus Balan, you cannot accuse others of ignorance if you believe Palestinians are just Jordanians who walked into Palestine during British rule.  Who do you think the majority of people living there have been for the past millennium and a half??  Besides that there was always transient migration between the modern day countries of Palestine, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt and Israel prior to the British coming in and creating arbitrary borders.  Kicking people off the land they own and call home is no more justified whether they are from a small or large ethnic group, and to suggest so is absurd.

      Secondly Fatah has been pushing for reinstatement of the 1967 borders for quite a while now, not the total destruction of Israel.  Even Hamas have been coming to this view over the past few years despite its militia wing actively taking part terrorist attacks and firing rockets across the border during that time.

      To the author, Fatah is not a democratically elected Government, Hamas won the last election and Fatah decided to ignore that and take control of the West Bank.

    • Marky says:

      12:25pm | 31/12/10

      Mitch, correct me if I am wrong. I very well could be. But Isn’t Mahmoud Abbas the president of the future start of Palestine and was democratically elected to that position by the PLO?

      I realise it is not exactly the same as a full and free election, but hasn’t the PLO been recognised by many countries around the world as the representative body of Palestine? Even Israel recognises them.

      I may be completely wrong, if I am, I’d love to know more

    • Brutus Balan says:

      01:47pm | 31/12/10

      TChong: Your response is even bizarre man.  I said there is no such thing as a ‘Palestinian” race but this so called Palestinians are Arabs as Mitch has pointed out.  Transient Arabs occupying the Land the Jews historical lived for 1,000s of years till their exile and diaspora.  Palestine is and was Jordan for they are the majority there.  They are the transient Arabs from elsewhere.  The transient Arabs now called Palestinians were there in Jewish land but that was never their ancestral home country.  Arafat walked away from the generous offers made at Camp David when almost all Arab demands were met by the Israeli PM for peace.  They want Israel to go into exile again.  No democratic people
      will put up with Arab-Muslim aggression who is bent on decimating the Jews openly.  You are ignorant TChong !!!

      Mitch, read more Middle east history before you comment, please.

      You are not just ignorant but you don’t pay attention to words too.  You also seem to have a problem considering the whole context but selective in truth.

    • Dan says:

      06:53pm | 31/12/10

      Eric, make no mistake, but you are no friend of Israel!

      Brutus Balan, I find that whenever someone talks about there being no such as Palestinian, they attempt to deny their rights to statehood. Make no mistake about it, the Palestinians (who are absolutely a people) are morally and legally owed a state of their own. Many of these Palestinians have ties to the land stretching back hundreds of years. They have an absolute moral and legal right to statehood.

      Also, with all your talk about Arab-Muslim aggression, has it occured to you that the dispute isn’t so black+white?

    • Gregg says:

      11:00am | 01/01/11

      @ Marky, re
      ” Mitch, correct me if I am wrong. I very well could be. But Isn’t Mahmoud Abbas the president of the future start of Palestine and was democratically elected to that position by the PLO? “
      Mahmoud was elected as President but just like you can have a lame duck President in the US, the US/Israelis and media gave him a pair of crutches for Mitch was correct.

      There were elections which Hamas won and Fatah, the PLO party had more people in the West Bank, that being separated from Gaza and the two not the best of pals, Fatah usurped control of the WB.
      Whether or not it was that Hamas have been prepared to make more of a militant stand or that in being seen as a terrorist organisation and thus less politically palatable, their win in the elections was glossed over and has received absolutely minimal further media coverage since and you can ask questions of appropriate people why.

      With the IRA saga and outcome whatever it ultimately may be, it is ironical that the Brit poodle has been some sort of an envoy in the region.

    • A Dose of Reality says:

      11:06pm | 02/01/11

      Brutus Balan

      “It is wiser to be silent and thought a fool that to speak up, and remove all doubt”

      Please, if nothing else read the above over and over.  You need to consider it - desperately.

      The palestinians are indeed a people/race, over millennia they have absorbed invading/occupying races but they are genetically a Semitic people of the Levant , mentioned in ancient text and are not only related to Jews (as are arabs) but possibly pre-date the Jews in what was referred to as “Palestine” during the English occupation of the Ottoman territory after WWI.

      Their genetic make-up and “name” is similar to how Britain’s population is genetically Celtic, although always referred to as Anglo-Saxon.

      Your view of more recent history is also completely false and rather fanciful, - refer to the quote above.

      At the time the Jews started leaving Europe to settle in palestine (after WWI) there were some Jews living there, as there always had been (The idea that they were completely dispersed is false).  There were approximately 80,000 of them.

      However there were approximately 800,000 Palestinians.

      You will find that these people were forced FROM their ancestral homes INTO Jordan and Lebanon, causing massive refugee problems. 

      As for the Jews “native land” - this is akin to the English “reclaiming” Holland and Saxony (Germany) as this is where the Saxons and Angles invaded Britain from.

      You have either one of the worst comprehensions of history I’ve come across or you simply have a racial hatred.

      I hope it is the former, that can be helped.

    • grumpy old man says:

      07:51am | 31/12/10

      this is what happens when an immovable force is hit by an unstoppable object!.
      The reality is that neither side has a compelling reason to reach any sort of workable settlement. Both leaders have political agendas that require maintaining the status quo, and continuing support of either state by foreign governments is adding fuel to the fire.

      There are really only two ways to resolve this;
      1. leave them alone to fight it out between themselves, withdraw all, and this does mean all, support, financial, moral, weapons etc, from both sides, and let them duke it out without any external support., and apply last man standing rules. Harsh, perhaps, but probably no harsher than both sides being supported to continue as they are.
      2. create a compelling reason for both sides to change their stances. I suspect that this will need to be quite harsh, something along the lines of “if you don’t stop it, I’ll bang both your heads together “and impose some foreign rules, probably UN.

      As both parties have clearly demonstrated, they have neither the appetite or incentive to change anything, and both sides of the conflict are supported by, and used by, other governments to support their own foreign policy objectives. As Hilary Clinton has clearly stated, US foreign policy is to designed to serve US interests, so their stated objective of peace in the middle east has to be viewed with this in mind.

    • marty healer says:

      09:40am | 31/12/10

      Please please please look up the history of what the palestinians have and are suffering ,it is like samson and goliath ,the zionists have never had any intention of a two state solution , palestinian land has gone from 45% to 11% in 50 yrs, the land that is left is broken up into bits and pieces ,on average there are 3 farmers killed by sniper fire every week ,just for tending THERE land .the settlers have stolen there water ,they are blockaded in illegally , 800,000 palestinians driven off there land through murder and indiscriminate killing , i challlenge you too find pics of dead israeli children on the net , yet there are 100s of the palestinians ,this is not an equal battle ,it is a slaughter ,i am anti zionist not anti semetic and i am an orthodox jew so how could i be !

    • grumpy old man says:

      11:01am | 31/12/10

      Marty,
      I spent 6 months on UN peace keeping duties in the middle east, including some time in Beirut, I have a pretty good understanding of the history…from all sides!. I also lived in Bahrain for 3 years as a child.

      The rights and wrongs are basically irrelevant at this stage, its pretty difficult to right the historical wrongs without going back to the end of the first world war, possibly earlier, and unraveling from then.

      What is needed is a solution that resolves todays issues, and my point is that neither side ( or rather should I say sides as there are at least 4), is willing to concede anything. In the absence of any goodwill from any of the players, then options for resolution are pretty limited. The involvement of foreign governments is not a help, since they are only involved to further their own objectives, and one cannot help but wonder if things might be better if everyone else butted out.
      Whilst not questioning the facts of what you say, how does your saying it further the cause of resolution? Will what you say alter the position of any of the parties involved, or will it simply act to further harden views? Moral indignation will not resolve the issues, but it will prolong the time before there is a resolution, and therefore result in more suffering.

    • Sherekahn says:

      11:05am | 01/01/11

      However, the problems of human relationships are not ready to accept diplomacy to settle issues, Israel is a living example.
      War is the only choice left for some people, so let IRAN have nuclear weapons to defend themselves and help other people in the Middle-East defend themselves against fanatics.
      So much money is wasted on diplomacy that would be better spent on a clean up after the dust settled, even Nuclear dust. Perhaps we really NEED such a wake-up call to bring us to our senses.

    • Sherekahn says:

      11:20am | 01/01/11

      I am sickened to my soul that Israel is allowed to do this!
      Any other Country but Israel would be held to account; this surely shows that power of ARMS wins over sanity. This is why Countries such as Iran MUST obtain nuclear arms to defend itself and combat Terrorism in the Middle East.
      Israelis are Western people in the middle of Non-Western people.
      This Religious Israeli sickness has no rights above other communities in the world.
      Only 6 million Jews were killed in WW II.
      44 million other people were killed.  Does anyone spare a thought for those people?
      We are; ‘sick, sick, sick.’ of Israel being the cause of 90% of the world’s problems.
      If Obama wishes to spend a second term in the Whitehouse, then he’d better stop vetoing resolutions by the rest of the world against Israeli behaviour.

    • Radagast says:

      09:18am | 31/12/10

      It’s a bit like what to do with the English. They only arrived in Britain about 1,500 years ago, but see it as their home land (religiously). Unlikely that we’ll ever get rid of them now. But it is annoying that they think it’s their own land - it isn’t, it never was, and it never will be.

    • Ben81 says:

      09:49am | 31/12/10

      It’s sure as shit their land now.  What group of people politically convenient to you should take over the place to make you feel better about things?

    • Chris L says:

      11:22am | 01/01/11

      @Ben81, I don’t think Radagast was suggesting to displace the English. He was simply pointing out the relevance of claiming land that was there before the population had ever arrived and will be there long after they have faded into obscurity.

      Or perhaps you understood the point and were reinforcing it with an adversarial point of view. Such subtleties are beyond me.

      I think the point is that everyone is where they are and they can live with it, or not live with it. I hope I can remain philisophical about it if ever the Chinese decide they want a piece of Australia.

    • TheRealDave says:

      11:08am | 31/12/10

      A wise man once said ‘There will be no peace in the Middle East until the Palestinians love their children more than they hate the Jews’.

      Its always amused me that there was no such thing as a ‘Palestinian’, a ‘Palestinian homeland’, etc till after the arse kicking of 1967 when suddenly Syria, Iran, Egypt, Jordan et al realized they had no real hope of defeating Israel militarily so they moved to using what were then Jordanians and re-labelled them ‘Palestinians’ and moved to a covert war of terrorism and murder instead of conventional military conflict.

      Why was there no movement to help free a ‘Palestinian Homeland’ before 1967? It wouldn’t be because the land was owned by Jordan would it?

      But one thing you will have to give them credit for is their brilliant PR machine, especially of late where sympathizers and a complicit western press have allowed them to carefully stage manage their propaganda for the western world. The recent low scale conflicts in both Lebanon and Gaza has beautifully illustrated this. Whether its gleefully re-publishing doctored photo’s or rushing to the press with ‘eyewitness’ stories from sources inside Hamas and Hezbollah as ‘civilian sources’ its just absurd now.

      Just as this article is taking great pains to paint Israel in a negative light. Of course the author of this piece mentions nothing of the large swaths of land Israel has handed back, the farms Jews carved out of the desert where once there never was anything only to have jubilant ‘Palestinians’ singing and burning the places to the ground within 5 minutes of the Israeli pullout and calling for the ‘onwards march to Jerusalem’. Nor will the author want to mention the fact that Israel was ready to hand complete control to Yasser Arafat back in the 1990’s of a separate independent Palestine but at the last minute Arafat knocked it back at the behest of his political masters.

      Yes, both sides have been and will be in the wrong. Any sensible view of the history of the region will illustrate that. Its just a pity that we are being force fed a load of anti-Israel, and by extension anti-US crap, by people who either have no idea about the region and are merely repeating the ‘crap de jour’ like its cool or are maliciously bending the truth.

    • Marky says:

      12:10pm | 31/12/10

      Real Dave. I think you will find the first Palestinian government was formed during the Israeli-Arab war of 1948. Sept 22, if my memory serves me correctly., by the arab league.

      I think you will find there is a rich and long history of both Palestinian and Jewish populations in the area, well before this time too.

      While this article is a little one sided. Both sides have caused huge amounts of harm to each other. You can’t deny both sides right to exist.

    • Katie says:

      06:55pm | 31/12/10

      Just because someone isn’t anti-Israel doesn’t make them anti-US, and vice-verca. Although I personally don’t think that anti-Americanism is crap.

    • stephen says:

      12:51pm | 31/12/10

      Your quote ending with ‘interim agreements’, was a response to the Palestinians, for mainly two reasons :
      Palestine’s intention to approach the UN and declare itself a State ;
      secondly,  the recognition of a Palestinian Statehood by Brazil, Argentina, and I think also Chile and Venezuela.
      Both of these, especially the former, would have greatly surprized the Israelis.
      (Remembering that the State of Israel was created precisely the same way.)
      The notion that Mr. Netanyahu is incapable to negotiate a peace plan because of his right-wing partners is a furphy. Neither he or Mr. Lieberman have any intention of easing settlements in the West Bank, and although some commentators have stressed that such a halt is unproductive, I can’t think of anything else - except maybe the easing of restrictions in Gaza - that would ecourage Mr. Abbas more.
      The Palestinians made one stupid error : when they were given Gaza in 2008 by Ariel Sharon, they immediately voted in Hamas as a governing force.
      Bad mistake
      (Actually, when you are in receipt of a charity, as they were, you, psychologically, have the upper hand. The Palestinians should have used Gaza as a stepping-stone for further concessions. I doubt even the Americans would have been non-supportive.)
      I remember one of my relatives fighting in Palestine the WW1.
      If there was a Palestine, and someone was living there, then there were Palestinians.

      The matter that will force the Israelis to the negotiating table (the Palestinians have nothing to offer, except maybe Hamas, which I believe will be an offer of goodwill and not of real bargaining strength), is pressure exerted by the Americans, and who knows if the South Americans can finally pressure them ?

    • G.David says:

      01:56pm | 31/12/10

      The Arabs already have over 99% of the land in the Middle East to live in, why can’t the Jews have as their Homeland the little postage stamp sized area with which they have strong historical and ancestral links? Must the Arabs have everything and they nothing?

    • Levi says:

      02:18pm | 31/12/10

      Too right G.David.

      The western media has grown too comfortable with labelling Israel as some sort of evil force in the middle east. Kick the Jews out of Israel and where will they go? People are all to quick to forget their history.

    • St. Michael says:

      05:20pm | 31/12/10

      Where will the Jews go from Israel?

      Probably the same place Palestinians sick of fighting have gone: spread out across the various nations of the Earth.  Which, by the way, is where the Jews went en masse the last time they had their asses handed to them militarily, albeit by the Romans—under Vespasian if I remember right.  There’s this little thing called the ‘Diaspora’ you might want to look up sometime.

      Also, G. David, it mightn’t be such a problem if the Jews were actually content to remain on the little postage stamp sized area to which they claim strong historical and ancestral links and which they occupy already.  The behaviour of Jewish “settlers” in Palestine seems to indicate otherwise - which is a big cause of the problem.

    • stephen says:

      06:31pm | 31/12/10

      The problem is, who will give it, and, whose is it to give.

    • DS says:

      06:56pm | 31/12/10

      The Palestinians are not the Arabs. The Palestinians deserve a place of their own as well.

    • Sherekahn says:

      11:23am | 01/01/11

      The Israeli’s will never try for Peace until the whole world applies sanctions on them stemming their trade.
      If the United Nations was a Democratic Organisation that would be happening now.
      Move the UN to Europe and cancel all vetoes.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      06:04pm | 31/12/10

      I’d lay money on the Palestinians winning that little affair. They’ll out breed the Isrealis. Demographics usually wins in the end….

    • Sherekahn says:

      12:16pm | 01/01/11

      As with flies, Jews are to be found in EVERY country in the world.
      If all the Jews in the world were to go to their professed ‘homeland’ ie: Israel, then Saudi Arabia,Jordan and Lebanon and possibly Syria would be required to house them!

    • olufemi Hassan says:

      03:25am | 01/01/11

      I willl enjoy tne world leader to note that ,if there is no peace in the middle east there is likelyhood of no peace in the world. It is because there is no genue effort in making the jews and palextinians live side by side peacefully that is turning most terrorrist against the interest of USA,Uk,Germany, etc.please come closser and put in genue effort and ensure peace in the middle east so tha the world can be a better place where peace, justice reign.

    • Holey Book Reader says:

      07:14am | 01/01/11

      The Jewish people are suffering from the fantasy that they are the Chosen People ane, therefore, right if everything they do.  International law means nothing to them as they refute any UN resolutions not to build in the Occupied Teritories.  Their arrogence know no bounds and they behave towards the Palestinians as if they were sub human, forgetting what the Nazis did to the Jews in WWII.

    • Gregg says:

      11:50am | 01/01/11

      One way or another you could say the problem with Israel is religion and though I do not necessarily think grumpy old men banging heads will ever fix the situation, the Grumpy Old Man is correct about WW1 and it was the League of Nations in about 1920-1922 that passed some sort of a mandate offering Israel up as some sort of homeland or promised land for those of Jewish faith.

      And that is the crux of the problem for whilst it could be held that the Vatican is the home of Catholicism and Mecca the home for Islam they are cities/locations and not countries though there are some countries which are predominantly of a particular religion and how some are governed will determine freedom of other religions or for religion at all.

      But go back well before the twentieth century, even to before King Richards Crusades if you like and you will find much history of Israel/Palestine or whatever it may have been called as a region of Syria and Wiki is as good as anywhere to start reading of history - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestine .
      There have been many centuries where people with various religious affiliations have lived peacefully side by side and that is somewhat still represented by the various religious interests at the Dome of the Rock, even though they may have a different connotation for their annual Rock festival.
      There are still in fact many of Islamic faith living in Israel though I am not quite up with what their citizen rights are nor what the latest is on some media reports re Israel looking to restrict their rights.

      But without being pro/anti semetic/muslim if you look to why there has been conflict between Jews and Arabs in current times and since WW2 it is that Israel was formed through violence and with much blood shed post WW2.
      It is too late it would seem to ever hope for a review of what was proclaimed by the league of nations though if you look at Iraq, not that any great success can be claimed, change can be attempted by force.
      Present day Iraq was formed post WW1 when the Brits and Frogs carved up the middle east and hence the various factions in the country, Kurds in Turkey and the place only being unified when you had a strong if brutal leadership and the same will likely occur again at some time in the future.

      Israel is doing it in their neck of the woods and has the military strength to maintain the upper hand even if many of their own people do weary of the conflict and so rather than a two nation solution, how brave a leader would it be to announce to the Palestinians and the Arab world:
      . Israel and Palestine should be one with equal rights for all.
      . Establish a truth and justice commission as was done post Mandella’s release and election as SA President so equality including land rights can be established.
      . UN oversight for establishing a secular government and as changes of this order are likely to take several decades to get well bedded, there should be some long term goals determined:
      . First on the list is that the UN is to oversee establishment of a constitution to enable a first government to take place and that all militant forces should be consolidated which means that the IDF, Fatah and Hamas become one.

      As difficult as that may seem there are already organisations of ex Israeli military people who are making efforts to join with Islamic people in peace.

      Initial parts of the plan should be to throw out that term ” Roadmap ” along with any hi foluting envoys that want to use it and have this process energised by people power and it will mean identifying strong leadership in all communities.
      West and East Germany have been unified as has Vietnam and it would seem to be more where separations are enforced that we have problems, n-s Korea, India and Pakistan, even Ireland and NI to mention a few.

      It may not work, it’ll be difficult to make it work but at least it’ll be no worse than where we’re heading and that’s forever into the unknown and hopefully not to Nuclear weaponry use.

    • Harquebus says:

      02:20pm | 01/01/11

      Religion is the enemy. Until that is defeated, there will be no peace.

    • P. Darvio says:

      02:53pm | 01/01/11

      The real problem is religion. Both sides claim a GOD given right to occupy the same land and they have been killing each other over their respective Gods right to land. Pathetic. There will never be any peace in this region - all because of the vile and violent religious texts of the 3 Abrahamic “faiths” and the blind sheep who practice it.

    • James P says:

      01:01pm | 02/01/11

      Palestinians already have their country.  It is the land east of the Jordan river which constitutes about 70% of the old British Mandate.  It is called Jordan.

      The israelis have their own country as well.  It is that land west of the river Jordan, including the West Bank and Gaza.

      The only reason that the Jordanians won’t take in their arab brethren from the West Bank and Gaza is political.  They would rather sacrifice those peoples in order to keep the festering Palestinian sore alive and suppurating.

      This mess has nothing to do with a Palestinian “homeland”.  It has everthing to do with the destruction of Israel.  Israel would be far better off to get it over with once and for all and expel every arab from west of the Jordan river and stuff the consequences.

    • DS says:

      03:19am | 03/01/11

      “Palestinians already have their country.”

      No, they do not. The Palestinians do not have a state of their own as yet, which they are legally and morally owed. Many of the Palestinians barely have any connection to Jordan. They need a state of their own, no matter what extremists like you think.

      “This mess has nothing to do with a Palestinian “homeland”. “

      Yes, it does, and you can not deny them statehood by putting it into inverted commas.

      ” It has everthing to do with the destruction of Israel.”

      Not quite.  However, it seems that you want the destruction of the Palestinian people.

      “Israel would be far better off to get it over with once and for all and expel every arab from west of the Jordan river and stuff the consequences. “

      Are you serious? It’s fanatics like you who are responsible for this. There is no difference between an extremist like you, and the extremists who want Israel destroyed.  I don’t know (or care) what your background or religion is, but if you are advocating the expulsion of all Arabs, and are are willing to deny the Palestinians their just statehood, then you are NO friend of Israel. You’re just a fanatic and an extremist, the sooner that the likes of you take your fanaticism elsewhere, the sooner there will be peace.

      Oh, and don’t bother to give Israel any advice. Israel doesn’t take advice from ignorant extremists who use Israel to perpetruate your hatred and Islamophobia!

    • Bigos says:

      03:59pm | 03/01/11

      DS I think you live in fantasy land. When the UN divided up the land of the British Mandate, no calls were made for a “Palestinian” state. There never was a Palestinian people, language or culture. Try finding it for yourself; What did the Palestinians trade in 1800s, what money did the use, what was their national anthem, any traditional dishes? You won’t find this information because there was never such a thing as Palestinians. It was always Arabs and Jews living in an area called Palestine by the Romans after pre-historic enemies of the Jewish people, the Philistines who were actually descendants of Greeks. The mandate was divided into Jewish and Arab areas. The Arab areas belonged to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.

    • James1 says:

      08:29am | 04/01/11

      Bigos, given that Australian is not a race, and is a constructed entity, I guess we could argue that the state of Australia has no right to exist.  Also, did the Jews living in modern Palestine call themselves Israelis in 1800?  Did they use shekels for currency?  What was their national anthem?  Why, by your own standards, are they so much more entitled than other ethnic groups like Arabs?

    • Bigos says:

      12:15pm | 04/01/11

      James1; You are right, Australian is not a race, it’s a nationality. All nation states are “constructed entities”. To answer your questions, yet the Jews of Palestine called themselves Iraelites for a long, long time. Yes they used the shekel for over 2000 years. Also I don’t have my own standard, I simply saying that the people who call themselves Palestinian never existed historically, they were just Arabs living in Palestine, as such they got their state when Jordan was created. As for entitlement, I don’t think either side it entitled to anything more then they got initially. Virtually most nation states in that region were created by fiat.

    • DS says:

      10:34pm | 04/01/11

      Bigos, the Palestinians morally and legally deserve a state of their own regardless of what you think!

    • Bigos says:

      09:37am | 05/01/11

      DS, while I am not the arbiter of morality I am saying that the land, which was called Palestine was divided into 2 states. One was Jewish and one was for the Arabs. As such the “Palestinians” have a state, this state is known as Jordan.

    • A Dose of Reality says:

      11:21pm | 02/01/11

      James P

      Palestinians have only lived in jordan en mass since they became refugees in that country (and Lebanon) after they were sacrificed by the British when the middle-east was carved up.

      That you could hold the views as you have posted saddens me for your sake.  it must be a horrible life that you have led.

    • loxy says:

      02:54pm | 03/01/11

      Poor one-sided journalism max! Both sides have been guilty at many times over this long conflict of making no concessions - after all they both want exactly the same bit of land to the exclursion of all others - not much room for concessions in that goal now is there.

      Next time actually research the history and write a real story that looks at both sides of the coin or don’t bother.

    • James1 says:

      08:26am | 04/01/11

      A bit one sided loxy.  Since the World War Two, the Arabs living in what is now Israel, Gaza, and the West Bank have made nothing but concession, even though those concessions were often forced on them.  What has Israel ever had to concede, that someone didn’t concede to them to begin with?

      What is needed for peace in that region is for Israel to stop stealing land from the Arabs and for the Arabs to renounce violence, and accept Israel as it currently exists.  Nothing less from either side will suffice, although I seriously doubt that either side has the courage to undertake such actions.

      For those of you that you are so committed to historical ownership, I suppose you will be giving your house and land to a local Aborigine..,.

    • Bigos says:

      12:10pm | 04/01/11

      James1 said:
      “I suppose you will be giving your house and land to a local Aborigine..,. “
      Yes, it’s called Native Title. And I think it’s wrong since the Aborigines didn’t believe in land ownership. They were a nomdaic people.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

This concern for Thomson won’t change the script

This concern for Thomson won’t change the script

Under pressure himself over his crusade against Craig Thomson, Tony Abbott has moved to present a softer…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter