Welcome to July – a month when ridiculous numbers of Australians forgo rude quantities of sleep to watch a bunch of spandexed bulgers ride bikes in a big circle round a snotty nation on the other side of the planet.

Just like George Street on a Monday morning

Bitter? Moi? I’d answer “mais oui” but that would be playing right into the hands of le enemy.

France’s annual Tour de Tighty Pants brings mixed emotions for those of us who pedal pushies about the place on a daily basis. And by mixed emotions, I mean a seething combination of bitter and twistedness.

After all, we regular riders can only dream of receiving the rapt attention given to competitors in what has become one of the most watched sporting events in the world.

Cyclists in the Tour de Straining Quads are observed with microscopic detail. Their non-regulation saddle angles, their problematic shingles, their claims to have simply consumed a clenbuterol-tainted filet mignon on a rest day…

These two-wheelerites don’t need eyeball-searing fluoro vests to maintain spectacular visibility. As far as international media audiences are concerned, they glow in the dark.

We ordinary riders, on the other hand, have very different cycling experiences.

Half the time we are invisible. Cars drivers open their doors into us, bus drivers attempt to park on top of us, and SUV-ers only register our existence once critical chunks of our flesh have accumulated in their front grills.

In fact those top secret military researchers working on invisibility cloaks should try sending test soldiers into the field on push bikes to watch them disappear magically as if by magic from the radar.

Now you see ‘em. Now you don’t.

The only problem is that, as previously mentioned, the invisibility factor only works on 50 per cent of occasions. The rest of the time bicycle riders are hyper-visible: an irritant so potent we inspire a phenomenal, toe-curling stream of both road rage and footpath fury.

The names I am called on my daily electric bike commute from Sydney’s inner west to its east break the obscenity barrier and rate a screaming 10 on the explete-o-meter.

“Get off the blanking road, you blanking blanky blank,” bellow the drivers.

“Get back on the blanking road, or I’ll stick my blanking blank so far up your blank you’ll blank when you blankety blank,” bawl the pedestrians.

My experiences are hardly unique.

Google “I hate cyclists” and the two million plus results include multiple threats of cycle-o-cide as well as computer games which encourage the whacking of bicyclists with baseball bats. There’s also the claim that lycra-wearing cyclists resemble human condoms (hurtful because it’s true).

Facebook offers a number of aggressive bike dislike pages including “Hey Cyclists, Get the F—- off my road!!!”, “Screw you Canberra cyclists! There’s a perfectly good footpath right there!” and “I bet I can find 100,000 people who hate cyclists”.

The good news for bikers is that this last group only has 11 members. The bad news is that similar sites boast much larger populations and include comments such as “legalise vehicular homicide against cyclists” and “what a delightful day to run over a cyclist”.

I’m sure I speak for cyclists everywhere when I say: ouch. And also: what the hell have we ever done to you?

Apart from helping save the planet from car fume suffocation, surely we perform an important public service by giving everyone the chance the vent their bile. And while a few of us may display crappy commuting manners, does this really justify the burqa-strength bike-ism?

Aesop’s fable about the birds, the beasts and the bats offers some insights into the reasons cyclists are so comprehensively loathed

In this short and typically brutish bestiary, a great war is about to ensue between the birds and the beasts. But when the two great armies gather, the bat won’t commit to either, telling the birds he is a beast, and the beasts he is a bird.

Peace erupts at the last moment, but when the bat attempts to join the birds’ rejoicing, he is turned away. The beasts also threaten to tear him wing from wing. “Ah, I see now,” this unfortunate dilettante concludes. “He that is neither one thing nor the other has no friends.”

Cyclists are like the friendless anti-hero of this fable, in that we are half-castes who can flit bat-like between the kingdom of the roads and the kingdom of the footpaths without committing to either.

This is not an admirable decision if we only obey green traffic lights when road riding, or if we plough through pedestrians like we own the place after curbing up. 

But many of us are actually polite, peace loving folk, who always obey the rules on the roads and who never fail to ting our “coming up behind ya” bells when we take refuge on the footpaths.

As such, I suspect that much of vitriol directed our way is jealousy of our nimble hybrid status. The rest is scapegoatism in that we provide handy receptacles for vague rage.

Well. While I don’t condone the selfish or dangerous use of any public thoroughfares, I do think that being neither one thing nor the other should carry fringe benefits as well as friendlessness.

As such, I will continue to risk fines (and so far I’ve copped only one) by sometimes riding with the beasts on the road and sometimes trundling along with the birds on the footpath.

Quiet back streets are a two-wheeled bat’s dream and I use them as much as possible. It’s amazing how much more enjoyable bike riding becomes if you’re not in constant fear of becoming road rissole.

Venturing onto most stretches of main road, however, requires a major death wish. And many of Sydney’s motley collection of bike paths seem calculated to cull as many cyclists as possible.

Some end abruptly with unsigned cement barriers or siphon riders directly into roaring traffic. Other “official” bike routes are no more than an optimistic image of a pushie painted on the road. Now that’ll keep the speeding semis at bay.

Given that a) it’s sadistic to force cyclists to ride only on the road and b) it’s eminently possible for pedallers to negotiate pedestrians with exquisitely beautiful manners, surely the time has come to give us bats a bit more breathing room and allow us – legally – to share the sidewalks.

Anyone who abuses this by racing along like they’re in the Tour de Bifurcating Buttocks should have their footpath privileges evoked immediately. But the rest of us deserve a break that doesn’t involve the fender fracturing of our femurs.

Get more Emma Jane at The Australian.

72 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Al says:

      06:38am | 11/07/11

      Emma, you are officially Awesome ... 5/5 bidons for you, not that ya need em with your Electric pushie ;P

    • centurion48 says:

      08:34am | 11/07/11

      I assume you meant ‘revoked’ rather than ‘evoked’ but it is hard to get the fingers working properly on cold mornings.
      I liked your article except for the tired barbs at cyclists who wear lycra. I am not even sure why you needed to include references to the Tour de France because it was an otherwise good article.

    • TRBNGR says:

      09:19am | 11/07/11

      “Welcome to July – a month when ridiculous numbers of Australians forgo rude quantities of sleep to watch a bunch of spandexed bulgers ride bikes in a big circle round a snotty nation on the other side of the planet.”

      What the shit is a bulger?

    • trentyn says:

      09:58am | 11/07/11

      bulge/b?lj/
      Verb: Swell or protrude to an unnatural or incongruous extent: “the veins in his neck bulged”; “bulging eyes”.
      Noun: A rounded swelling or protuberance that distorts a flat surface.

      one can assume, a bulger is one who bulges. not that this at all refers to my lycra, lawl.

    • dancan says:

      10:51am | 11/07/11

      spandexed bulgers.

      Me thinks Emma isn’t watching the race just for the cycling

    • Tanya says:

      09:24am | 11/07/11

      Excellent article. I am equally puzzled at the utter hatred that I experience from drivers, when I have actually done nothing to create it. On several occasions, I have being subject to quite deliberate actions to run me off the road, which could have resulted in serious injury or my death. I wonder if the driver would have been so tough, brave and macho as they stood in the court dock, charged with manslaughter, and looking into the eyes of my grieving husband, parents, brother, friends and family.

      Yes, sounds a bit dramatic, but it only takes a split second, a bit of impatience, too much bravado, and a one tonne vehicle travelling at 60km hour.

      I do my very best to keep myself safe while riding - that means no iPod, always lights even in daylight, visable clothing, clearly indicating turns, being hyper vigilent of drivers around me. All I ask is for a little patience and care from the drivers around me. Plenty of drivers do this, and I often thank them with a thumbs up and a smile. But the sad thing is, it only takes one loose cannon to try to kill or seriously injure me.

    • Bilby says:

      09:34am | 11/07/11

      On my 20km commute that takes me through the city, over the bridge, and up the other side I don’t get any abuse at all. Is it the area? Is it the way I ride? Could it simply be that I’m a largish bloke and people that abuse others from their cars are basically gutless?

      Btw I too ride an electric pushy which purists like to call cheating. It would be cheating, if what I wanted to do was ride some kind of primitive device for exercise instead of a fun device for transport. Each to their own I guess.

    • Al says:

      09:52am | 11/07/11

      i think it is partly the area and also the time of day i find ... riding around the central coast and lake macquarie of nsw, there’s definite spots where the aggro level is much higher. Luckily i don’t commute as those times of day up here are pretty hairy.

      the electric pushies do sound good for the commute and certainly makes this mode of transport more accessible. More people out there the better, not just for cyclists but also for motorists as its one less car. (I was only having a laugh earlier with my crack about Emma’s lack of need for bidons wink )

    • Bilby says:

      10:16am | 11/07/11

      Bottles may not be necessary, but the cage is. So long as they’re mounted on the handle bars they hold a large cappuccino very nicely wink

    • Tanya says:

      11:57am | 11/07/11

      Bilby, I don’t think it is about the way you ride. Recently, I was riding down Bondi Rd, signalling my intention to change lanes, when a car drove right up behind me (way too close for comfort, let alone legally) and beeped the horn. Scared the living daylights out of me, and almost caused me to crash. I was in a perfectly legal position, was signalling, doing all the right things…. the poor angry sod was determined to take out his hatred on me, with potentially serious consequences to my helath. And what was it for? I caught up to him in the traffic about 30 seconds later.

    • The Other Phil says:

      09:42am | 11/07/11

      I find that you’re damned if you do, and damned if you don’t when it comes to riding on the road. Obey all the road rules, and you risk getting cleaned up from behind by a car failing to stop at a stop sign or set of traffic lights, and if you ride on the footpath (even just to clear a difficult piece of road), you’re shouted off there too.

      I’d love to feel safe while riding, and I take all the precautions to make sure I’m highly visible, exhibit proper signalling etc, but getting yelled at multiple times an hour just because I’m riding a bike is just ridiculous.

    • AnthonyG says:

      10:01am | 11/07/11

      What fucking country are we living in? I’m still trying to decifer the heading

    • Shenanigans says:

      10:59am | 11/07/11

      my french is a little rusty so please forgive me if im wrong, but i believe its something to do with her loving cycling arse cracks.

    • PW says:

      01:51pm | 11/07/11

      Actually (and my French is not too flash either) a literal translation of the heading would read “I Do Not Love the Tour de Bifurcating Buttocks”. Which really has very little connection to the article’s content.

      Good article, but what are we going to do about these four-wheeled fruit loops who think they own the road? I’m getting people I’ve never met wanting to duke it out in six lanes of traffic over a couple of seconds. Some people really do need professional help.

    • Alison says:

      10:04am | 11/07/11

      Well put Emma.  As an infrequent bike commuter (who does don the lycra - sorry, it’s just more comfy!) I am all too familiar with your description of your daily ride.

      One addition from the overnight news - it seems that our Tour cyclists are also not immune to being swerved into by an impatient car. Will the car rage never end!

    • Leggy says:

      02:09pm | 12/07/11

      Yes, at least being knocked off one’s bike during the commute doesn’t usually involve a barb-wire fence. Watch out for those French journos…

    • Katie says:

      10:06am | 11/07/11

      Like bad drivers, we hate cyclists for the bad ones among you. For the cyclists who think riding three across in a lane or wobbling around in it so a car can’t pass is a good past-time (particularly on long, winding, mountain roads where we legally can’t switch lane). For the cyclists who have no idea of the road rules and don’t indicate nor wear bright clothing at night.

      Because of the cyclist who almost bowled me over the other day… on the footpath in the middle of the city. Or the one that bowled over an old lady getting off a tram at the tram-stop because he didn’t think he needed to stop…

      Many of you are highly annoying, think you’re above the law and make it difficult to get from one place to another on the road. Sure, you cop abuse and that’s not great either, but frankly, you’re a pain… and easy to pick out.

      So maybe we all need to pick up our game, you to stop being irritating, and us to stop abusing you. Fair trade?

    • Hermano says:

      10:31am | 11/07/11

      I’ll stop being irritating when cars stop killing people.  Deal?

    • Dee says:

      10:42am | 11/07/11

      So motorists can continue to be irritating?  How’s that a fair trade?

    • Mahhrat says:

      12:35pm | 11/07/11

      @Katie, did you hire Hermano and Dee to make your point for you?  They’re doing a great job, and you might consider giving them a raise.

    • PW says:

      01:55pm | 11/07/11

      Er, Katie, I hate to break this to you, but cyclists don’t have to indicate. Whenever they do so, it is as a courtesy. You see, the hands are often occupied by the brake levers on a modern bicycle.  No idea of the road rules, you were saying?

    • Benrama says:

      10:17am | 11/07/11

      Even in the tour cyclists aren’t safe from cars as Flecha and Hoogerland found out last last night.
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Fkiu7D5xHM

        And what did these two “lycra clad buldgers…(!?)” do having been just taken out, with one having his fall cushioned by a barbed wire fence? They got back up and continued in what is the the most physically arduous sporting event on the planet.

      Rugby league is for pussies.

    • fairsfair says:

      10:18am | 11/07/11

      Yesterday I was going to my parents house and the last few kms is a narrow two laned semi-rural road, with no bike lanes or verges. IE - it fits two cars, just, and is windey and hilly as a biarch. I got to the windiest patch and there were two bikers all clad in their lycra riding side-by-side in my lane. I slowed to their pace. No way could I pass them as I could not see if there were any cars coming in the opposite direction. 22km/hr they were riding. 22km/hr. So for about a kilometer I did that speed. No need to get angry I thought to myself, no need to toot, it is Sunday morning, they are just enjoying the view, maybe the can’t hear me?

      I hung back in 2nd gear and one of them looked over his shoulder and saw me. He sped forward shaking his head and when I did pass at the widest opportunity, he gave me the finger….

      WTF was that about? There are good an bad in both camps, but when you are stuck in peak hour traffic, miss a light, are forced to do 22km/hr all due to the actions of people who in no way contribute to the upkeep and safety of the roads via insurance and registration fees, it sometimes makes you angry. Particularly whem most of them don’t abide by road rules, ride straight through red lights, stop signs, in the middle of roads etc etc.

      Bikes need to be registrerd and identifiable. Bike riders need some accountability for their actions on the road and then maybe there will be some more respect. Don’t get the f-k off the road, just pay your f-cking way and abide by the f-cking rules and we’ll all be f-cking happy.

    • Hermano says:

      10:36am | 11/07/11

      Everything that cyclist did (apart from the finger) was legal.  Sounds like you need some anger management.
      I’m not going to fight against the misinformation about who pays for roads, you can look into that yourself.
      I will ask though: when you’re stuck in peak hour traffic, how often is there a bike in front of you?  From what I can tell it’s usually cars that hold cars up.  And I’m usually going faster, on my bike.  Take a deep breath, Fairsfair.  Bikes aren’t the problem.

    • Jimbo says:

      10:52am | 11/07/11

      Once again, rego doesn’t pay for the roads. Go and look at the amount taken in registration revenue compared to the amount spent on roads if you don’t believe me. All riders pay tax at some level so to say they don’t contribute to the cost of roads is absurd.

      And could you please provide a citation for your claim that ‘most of them [cyclists] don’t abide by road rules’?

    • fairsfair says:

      10:53am | 11/07/11

      I’m not angry? I didn’t get angry yesterday, he was angry at me - for nothing more than respecting his right to be riding a bike.

      My use of F-ck was a direct link with the line in the article “Hey Cyclists, Get the F—- off my road!!!”. Maybe I should have used bankety blank blank instead?

      I know registration doesn’t pay for roads (well in QLD apparently some of it is supposed to), but cars are a massive contributor to government coffers. My local council has just installed a bikeway to keep cyclists off the main road from the north - they don’t use it. I’m not talking about a $500 a year anual fee - but some sort of rego plate would be handy as it is hard to report an idiot to the cops when they were “riding a blue bike and wearing a white helmet with yellow and green lycra”. You aren’t going to get far are you?

      Every day I have bikes in front of me in traffic. I am generally Ok with them, but when the lauch off at a green light, uphill with such force (on the left leg) and inadvertently wieve into the lane, in front of your car - yep, they hold up traffic. Espectially when they form packs. Then they start weiving in amongst cars because they refuse to wait at lights.

      And nil insurance, means no coverage for damage caused. My sister had a bike ride into the side of her stationary car. Absolutely no accountability for that man who dinted and scratched up her door. Yes - drivers must give way at all times, but when they stopped at a redder and a bike rides into the side of them - it is still the drivers fault.

      It takes two to tango and riders who refuse to believe that they in some instances contribute to the problem (as demonstrated in your reply to Katie above), are probably the biggest issue.

    • Hermano says:

      11:17am | 11/07/11

      Sounds like you have issues with individuals.  Like the guy who damaged your sisters car.  And like the guy that Katie saw hitting that woman. 
      As for the rest of it, we’re entitled (and in most cases, required) to be on the road by law.  Learn a bit of patience, we all have the right to be on the road, and being held up for 2 minutes isn’t going to kill you.
      And my response to Katie was sarcastic: the mere existence of cyclists seems to annoy her.  So I guess we’ll keep annoying her then.

    • Bilby says:

      11:36am | 11/07/11

      “but when you are stuck in peak hour traffic”

      You’re not *stuck* in peak hour traffic, you *are* peak hour traffic grin

    • Blind Freddy says:

      12:25pm | 11/07/11

      As someone who both rides a bike and drives a car I have to say in my experience the car drivers are a threat to bike riders and not the other way around.

    • Wynston Cruso says:

      12:44pm | 11/07/11

      Totally agree with fairs. Also, I have a question. Why is it illegal for a motorsit to travel at 20km/h or more below the speed limit, while it is not so for cyclists who take up an entire lane 2 or more abreast? In the instance fairs describes the cyclists caused her to drive illegally.

      I have nothing against cyclists, apart from when there is a perfectly good, purpose built bike path and they decide to use the road. I’ve never beeped, but I do enjoy timing my turbo just as I overtake. What annoys me more however, are the motorists who don’t know how to overtake a single cyclist, or a few for that matter riding in single file. People need to learn how to do things properly or not at all.

    • fairsfair says:

      01:00pm | 11/07/11

      @Bilby - touche’ wink

      Seriously, Hermano - I am not angry or impatient. I may tut tut inside of my car, but I don’t swerve, drive like a tool or hurl abuse. I respect a riders right to use the roads but I also see other drivers reacting stupidly and at the same time I see some rediculous actions by riders. Its a two way street (no pun intended) even though the drivers are capable of doing so much more damage.

      @Winston, fair comment. Their must be some sort of heirachy of road rules though. As giving way to riders at all times in yesterday’s situation forced me to sit at 22km/hr in a 60 zone for an extended period and then I had to straddle a double line to get past them (even though it was safe, the law doesn’t really give a crap). So yes, interesting.

    • Shifter says:

      02:58pm | 11/07/11

      @fairs - probably should’ve uses quotations marks when paraphrasing the article. I think a few folks have misread it as you hurling abuse and got their back up about it.

      The cyclist flipping the bird has obviously misunderstood your patience. Probably due to being almost killed 5 times earlier in the same day. It gets hard sometimes when the nerves are frayed.

      You’ve done well in waiting for a safe spot to overtake. That’s all we can ask.

    • Shifter says:

      03:09pm | 11/07/11

      @Wynston - There’s a problem with a lot of the ‘perfectly good, purpose built bike paths’ which Emma states ‘Some end abruptly with unsigned cement barriers or siphon riders directly into roaring traffic’.

      Usually the reason a cyclist will opt to stay on the road is that it is quicker and safer.

    • Jimbo says:

      04:12pm | 11/07/11

      On the rego plate thing - there is nowhere on the bike you could conceivably mount it, except facing sideways as on racing bikes, where it would be hard to see. Also, cars have rego plates, and yet that doesn’t stop many motorists from flouting the road rules quite often, so to claim that it would stop cyclists from flouting the road rules is perhaps optimistic. I would also say that it is ridiculous to erect more inconvenience to people performing exercise in a country with a massive obesity problem.

      Basically I go by the 90% rule - as in 90% of people will behave reasonably 90% of the time. Most drivers are fine and go straight past leaving a reasonable gap. It is just that the consequences that one idiot motorist can inflict upon a cyclist are so huge that many cyclists are understandably on edge a lot of the time. Motorists, beyond a dented panel, are at no risk from cyclists. You got an arsehole cyclist there, but as shifter pointed out, they may well have encountered just as many bad motorists that day.

    • fairsfair says:

      05:27pm | 11/07/11

      True Jimbo, but it is the minority of both road user groups that are ruining it for the majority (as in all things in life). I have never in all my days been aggressive toward a cyclist because I get the whole I big, he small situation. You have every right to phone the police if you witness stupid driving practices (as a bike rider or a fellow motorist) and if you can be bothered you can phone the same police station to follow up on your complaint until they police can confirm that they have spoken to the driver. I guess some sort of identifiable marker would give this option to motorists. Like in my sister’s situation, that loser bounced off and rode off. She was left trapped in traffic with a busted door and not even any opportunity to speak to that idiot.

      I think there are just as many twits in both camps and asking everyone to calm the farm is a bit pointless, because neither listen. People are inherantly selfish and will swear black and blue that they do no wrong. Even in two vehicle accidents. Some clown can rear end you and it is still not their fault due to a,b,c,d and e - but you at least have some recourse.

      Yes it is dream land on my part I know, but it would only really apply to that small percentage of cyclists who have the gumption to get out and ride in traffic - I certainly don’t, so I’ll continue to potter on foot paths and designated tracks. I only wish I was brave enough to get out on the main road, and by city standards I barely even witness real traffic where I live. That is essentially the problem too, few motorists know the feeling. I am petrified of motorbikes and pushbikes in amongst cars and I can only imagine the risks faced everytime you all get out there.

    • Hermano says:

      10:29am | 11/07/11

      I commute 65kms round trip from the hills to the city, and rarely cop any abuse.
      A truck full of tradies yelled “WANKER” at me on Friday as I overtook them on the M4.  Also got beeped that morning as I overtook a stationary ute.  From this sample, I suggest I cop abuse when making my way more quickly than motorists.  Makes sense to me.

    • Paddy says:

      10:35am | 11/07/11

      See, you can write an article that brings a smile to many faces.
      The Clenbuterol in the fillet, this is so last year.
      Can we have a guessing game to nominate what it or perhaps they are and whether testing covers it or them.

    • Richard M says:

      10:37am | 11/07/11

      Try being a walker on a walking/cycle path!  The cyclists display the very same attitude towards us as they accuse motorists of having towards them.  They give no warning of their approach from behind and rush past at great pace, usually coming very close to knocking you over, or at least giving you a great fright.  Their attitude is one of assumed ownership of the path, and great irritation at your presence.  They should perhaps examine their own behaviour before criticising motorists.

    • Uncanny says:

      11:45am | 11/07/11

      Not true, Richard M. I walk my dog daily on a shared walking/cycling path - and commute daily on my bike along the same path. I ALWAYS ring my bell when approaching someone from behind - not to tell them to get the hell out of my way (as some seem to like to take it) but to let them know I’m coming up and am going to pass. And when I do pass, I give as wide a berth as is possible.
      When I’m walking my dog, I always give a little wave to acknowledge I’ve heard the cyclist coming from behind me who’s rung their bell.
      Generalisations such as yours do nothing to improve relations between the different groups. It’d be a bit like me saying all walkers on shared paths walk along with their head stuck up their own asses, render themselves effectively deaf with I-Pods and then act as though it’s the cyclist’s fault when they have don’t hear numerous bell rings and eventual shouts of ‘Excuse me’ - this being necessary because they’re walking smack dab in the middle of the path.
      That’s not you is it, Richard? Hmm?

    • Richard M says:

      12:24pm | 11/07/11

      Where do you live, Uncanny, Paradise?  This is not my experience.  And I do not walk with my head stuck up my ass, but alertly, and with courtesy towards others.  If a cyclist gives me a warning, I move aside to make space for them.  Of course, not all cyclists behave as I have described - just most, in my experience.  In my view, most cyclists are arrogant and self-righteous, both on paths and on the road.

    • Uncanny says:

      12:44pm | 11/07/11

      Actually, Richard - I live in Highbury. Which is just up the road from Paradise. My walk takes me thru Paradise daily.
      Of course - not all walkers behave as I have described (me, for one!) - just most, in my experience.
      In my view, both as a cyclist and as a fellow-walker, most walkers trundle along in a daydream and the sight or sound of a cyclist , by their mere presence, gets them all het up - usually, for no reason.
      Chill - breathe in the fresh air. Play nice and share.
      Not too hard, is it?

    • Richard M says:

      01:26pm | 11/07/11

      Uncanny, you really are apparently failing to grasp the point I am making.  In fact, I do “play nice and share”.  It is most cyclists who don’t.  They display the same egotistical self-regard on the road.

    • Bilby says:

      01:33pm | 11/07/11

      Richard - Some bike riders are AFL supporters too!! Oh the arrogance!!

    • The Other Phil says:

      10:38am | 11/07/11

      So one mans actions will sully the name of cyclists everywhere? Don’t let that sort of thinking invade your psyche, because then you might start getting angry at all cyclists and one day you might just have had enough, and BAM. There’s an accident.

      “...but when you are stuck in peak hour traffic, miss a light, are forced to do 22km/hr all due to the actions of people who in no way contribute to the upkeep and safety of the roads via insurance and registration fees, it sometimes makes you angry.”

      This bit is just blatant self entitlement, and you’re saying “I pay mine, get off my road”. Most cyclists also own at least one car and have a family to move around, so they do pay for their fair share for the upkeep of the road, and a lot of cyclists I know also have insurance through companies like Velosure.

      Bike registration cannot fit in with the current vehicle registration paradigm because the number of people who get on a bike once in a blue moon just for something to do would need to register their bikes (which would be pointless if you ride it once a month), and if they’re caught ducking down to the shops on an unregistered bike, then they would, presumably, receive the same fine as the driver of an unregistered car would, because fairs fair right?

      Take a ride on the road sometime, and just see what it’s like (walking a mile in another mans shoes and all that). You’ll be surprised how bad and how good it can be.

      Again, don’t let the actions of one rider destroy your view of all cyclists. If you’d have waited like that for me while I was riding, I’d have waved thank you. It’s just the done thing.

    • Hermano says:

      10:57am | 11/07/11

      Other Phil: cyclists owning cars is irrelevant.  What IS relevant is that cyclists pay taxes and taxes go towards road building and maintenance.  Motorists are heavily subsidised by all taxpayers, and the reason they pay rego and insurance is because they drive a couple of tonnes of vehicle that kills and maims people, pollutes the atmosphere, clogs up public space (roads) and wears the roads out.

    • fairsfair says:

      11:21am | 11/07/11

      yet its ok for a rider to let a few bad experiences tar him for all drivers?

      Far out - talk about bull the tit at my comment. What a touchy subject. I was in no way raging against bikes, mearly tyring to counter the fact that some bike riders think they can do no wrong, yet I do acknowledge that some of them are (like me) just trying to get to work.

      Both riders and drivers are at fault. There is room enough on the roads for all parties with better managment of resources. Registration of bikes (even if it is free) would be a step in the right direction. Fining bike riders who use main roads when a bikeway is present - would also be a step in the right direction.

    • Hermano says:

      01:49pm | 11/07/11

      Yeh, it is a touchy subject.  I agree that the vast majority of drivers are great.  I haven’t received any serious abuse in a while, which is nice.  And I appreciate drivers like yourself who wait until it’s safe to pass, I really do.  Looks like we’re on the same page, pretty much.  If everyone was more tolerant of each other we’d be fine.

    • Jimbo says:

      12:15pm | 12/07/11

      fairsfair, I wouldn’t say I tar all motorists with the same brush, just that the sheer damage they can inflict upon a cyclist means that I take a cautious, assume everyone else is an idiot until proven otherwise approach. I do the same when I’m driving as well, if a truck or 4WD hits you in a normal car, you are bang in trouble as well.

      Often it is a matter of motorists not understanding why cyclists do such things - for example, often there is a lot of glass and other rubbish along the edge of the road, so you have to ride out from it to avoid it to avoid slicing a tyre open. Motorists sometimes get pissed at you doing this because you aren’t keeping to the very edge of the road. Also riding 1.5 metres out from parked cars - if someone opens a door on you, you’re screwed. Potholes etc. that a car will barely notice can send you over the handle bars or bust a rim - hence we need to avoid them.

    • dancan says:

      10:49am | 11/07/11

      It always amazes me when I travel to Asia that so many countries there with far worse roads and far more people seem to cope perfectly fine with bikes being everywhere.  Yet here we struggle so badly

    • Kate says:

      12:14pm | 11/07/11

      I’ll admit to getting frustrated at bike riders, particularly the ones who ride three abreast and veer into traffic, causing everyone to drop their speed to 20km/h in a 60 zone. But I don’t think riders should cop abuse just for existing.
      However, if I see one of you run a red light or disobey road rules, you better believe I’ll be directing the F word at you.
      And don’t worry, you’re not alone in being ignored by SUV drivers. The Toorak Tractor ladies around my suburb don’t even seem to notice my hatchback so I’m not sure how large your vehicle has to be before they realise they have to actually share the road, not bulldoze past you sans indicator.

    • Ben C says:

      01:24pm | 11/07/11

      I’m all for letting cyclists use the roads, provided the follow the road rules. That includes indicating when they are turning. It is amazing how many cyclists don’t even know the basics of indicating on roads - they’ll just turn when they need to.

      To all cyclists out there: Learn to use your arms to signal your intentions. If you need refreshing, your nearest motor registry will be able to assist you.

    • Hermano says:

      01:54pm | 11/07/11

      Not being a smartarse, but in NSW a cyclist doesn’t have to indicate to turn left, only right.  I always indicate both ways anyway cos I don’t like copping abuse from someone piloting 2 tonnes of metal. 
      My nearest motor registry told me this.

    • PW says:

      02:12pm | 11/07/11

      Ben C- it seems you drive on the roads yet it appears you don’t know the road rules, or very much about bicycles for that matter. Cyclists are not required to indicate. It is optional. There is good reason for this. Brakes on the vast majority of bicycles are hand operated. You cannot indicate and brake at the same time, unless you indicate with your foot.

    • Al says:

      02:28pm | 11/07/11

      i (sorta) had a good experience with this the other day ... approaching a roundabout for a right hand turn. Car from opposite direction is decked out in driving school stickers (but one driver).

      I’m thinking great this should be sweet. So the arm goes out, she’s still moving ... i’m waiting for a slow, nope ... But then a bit of an extra wave of the hand and on go the brakes just in time. (I think she was just a bit foggy, was mid-morning i get like that too.)

      Gave her a friendly thank u wave and off i went. One thing i find in situations like that is to not assume they’ll stop ... ever. Its the old ‘defensive driving’ applied to the bike. Has saved me a few times in the past, though it shouldn’t need to to such an extent.

    • stephen says:

      06:57pm | 11/07/11

      The roads were originally built for transport, e.g. distribution of goods and services, (the truckies and commercial bus companies pay nearly all costs that cover road maintenance) so you bumpkins who drive yourselves to work running cyclists off the roads should observe that you are as much asphalt guests as is the bicycle rider.
      Mum, dad and the kids are getting a ‘free ride’ ; that’s fine, but don’t get smart about it cause we are losing patience.

    • Garet says:

      07:37pm | 12/07/11

      Stephen, I don’t know where to begin with your comments. Have you anything at all that would support your contention that commercial road users pay the bulk of road costs? Provide some evidence, but I think you’re talking out of your proverbial on that one.  And as for your limited knowledge of history, it’s more recently (the last hundred years or so) that distribution of goods has happened on the roads, because the means to do it effectively did not exist until then. Goods and services were primarily transported by ship, barge and rail.

    • Bilby says:

      02:18pm | 11/07/11

      Just so we all know, yes bicycles do have to signal when turning in NSW.

      “As such, cyclists are required to obey the road rules, including stopping at red lights or Stop signs, Giving Way as indicated by signage and giving hand signals when changing direction.”

      http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/roadsafety/bicycles/cyclingrules.html

    • Ben C says:

      03:22pm | 11/07/11

      Thank you Bilby!

      @ Hermano

      It is a requirement that you indicate when turning, but at least you are following the rules, unlike some other cyclists out there. Even if it wasn’t a rule, it’s just pure courtesy.

      @ PW

      Looks like I’m not the one who doesn’t know the road rules. Nor about me for that instance, if you think I know not much about cycling.

    • PW says:

      08:43pm | 11/07/11

      @BenC

      Rule 46 in the NSW Road Rules deals with left turn signals, and specifically excludes vehicles without turn indicators. Rule 48 doesn’t, however both these rules refer to “drivers”.

      Rule 16 defines “drivers” as not including cyclists. It seems what is on the RTA website contradicts what is in the actual legislation. I think the legislation takes precedence.

    • Bilby says:

      07:47am | 12/07/11

      PW - You’re quite right. Thanks for that. Cyclists must indicate when turning right only, except when making a hook turn (whatever that is… some kind of southern abomination from what I hear).

    • PW says:

      08:26am | 12/07/11

      Actually my reading of it is that cyclists do not even have to indicate when turning right, since we are not “drivers” as defined in Rule 16. Although in traffic its probably a courteous thing to do. If waiting to turn right (at lights or for a break in traffic) its not really feasible to hold the arm out for the entire time.

    • PW says:

      08:30am | 12/07/11

      Fairsfair- those of us with only two arms have some difficulty holding one of them out whilst simultaneously operating the brake lever intended for that hand.

    • Bilby says:

      09:40am | 12/07/11

      PW - My reading of Rule 48 is that as (5) specifically excludes bicycles when making a hook turn, I assume that in other circumstances bicycles are included. Of course I very much want to be wrong as indicating right when the throttle is on the right (electric bicycle) is a right pain in the ring wink

    • Mr A Dad says:

      03:27pm | 11/07/11

      Once again I find some many high the thou on here trying to say the bike riders are the only ones who don’t follow the road traffic act.  I should just copy and paste some of my other posts to combat all those bike haters out there.

      Cyclist are required to follow the road rule just like motorist and horse riders, tractors and the like. As my brother found out recently when a police office gave him a ticket for rolling through a stop sign, not justifying his actions just saying police pull over cyclist as well.

      Cyclist are required to follow road rules just like a car driver so let me ask you this, did you change lanes without indicating today, cross a solid white line, stop before the line at the lights/stop sign, or many of the other numerous laws in your local road traffic act, if you did good on you.

      Now to take it to the extreme like seems to occur when a story about cycling is published. ask yourselves how many times do you read, 2 cyclist killed drag racing down suburban street or 16 cyclist caught in drink driving blitz, fixed speed camera racks up $1,000,000 in cyclist fines, 3 bikes impounded following cyclist hoon driving, Cyclist imprisoned after taking police of 110 km/hour high speed chase. Or the worst Cyclist kills 3 mates in speed accident

      Once those headlines no longer appear in the papers then you can start having ago at this minority group of road users.

    • Ben C says:

      04:06pm | 11/07/11

      @ Mr A Dad

      The problem is that this minority seem to think that they don’t need to follow the rules. I’ve seen many turn without indicating, I’ve seen packs riding three abreast hogging a lane of traffic when the rules are that they must keep to the left of traffic at all times, the many that I’ve seen in the Sydney CBD weaving in and out of traffic (any driver doing that would be pulled up for dangerous driving).

      It’s not taking the high road in this case, because it does seem that there’s one rule for motorists and another for cyclists. Like I’ve stated in my earlier post, I have no problems with bikes on the roads - heck, I used to ride my bike to my mates’ houses long before I had easy access to a car (due to either licensing or availability).

      Using speed in your examples is not really the smartest way to illustrate your point. Think about giving way or stopping where required (like in your brother’s case), or indicating, or keeping left, or just riding sensibly - many instances where these rules are flouted.

    • Mr A Dad says:

      05:02pm | 11/07/11

      WOW you lose a lot when you forget words, my last line should of read :-

      “Once those headlines no longer appear in the papers about CAR DRIVERS then you can .....”

      My point being that it is motorists that are out there killing themselves and unfortunately innocent others, not the other way around. So maybe its about time everyone relaxed a bit and just learned to get along. 

      Us cyclist don’t have a cocoon of plastic and metal roll cage to protect us in an accident. So why so much hate. Do drivers give beep their horn and give the finger to a tractor going up a hill???

    • Lisa H. says:

      04:09pm | 11/07/11

      If cycling is for everybody, repeal the helmet laws for those adults using cyle paths.

    • PW says:

      08:53pm | 11/07/11

      I’m afraid I don’t understand the logic of this. You can travel quite fast enough on a cycle path to receive serious head injuries, just like anywhere else. I would be very surprised if helmet laws were repealed for bikes or motorbies, or seat belt laws for that matter.

      It really surprises me how many cyclists don’t want to wear helmets.

    • Geoff Russell says:

      04:11pm | 11/07/11

      Ah, ... every July, we see a little burst of cycling journalism in the mainstream. At least this is from someone who rides. I’ve often wondered how car drivers treat electric bike riders ... are they perhaps fooled into thinking that the engine makes “them” into “us”. Now I know. Thanks. But I can’t help doing the math. In my daily 12 km round trip commute I pass or get passed by perhaps 1-200 cars. At least 2 or 3 per day change lanes without indicating ... at no risk to me, I just see them that’s all, and about once per week someone takes it upon themselves to risk my life by (usually inadvertently) turning into or across my path or otherwise coming much closer to me than I’d like.  So most car drivers do the right thing, its just that we remember the idiots much, much, better!

      Mind you, the garcons of le tour don’t need cars to risk their lives, they are doing the job quite nicely by themselves ... with just a little help from a French TV film car who knocked 2 off last night.

    • papachango says:

      05:07pm | 11/07/11

      oh goody another cars versus cyclist war. I commute to work by bike and drive on the weekend, so which side should I take?

      Oh and sometoimes I walk so what side am I in the pedestrian vs cyclist war?

    • Nick says:

      02:48pm | 13/07/11

      Yeah joy…and fark knows about what side you should take.  We’re not even the bat.  What is it with all these haters.  I walk, run, ride bikes, drive a car, ski, snow board, own dogs, own cats, have kids etc etc…I’m supposed to hate everybody and everybody hate me but I have a good life, almost never feel aggrieved about the actions of the people around me, have lots of pleasant interactions with passersby.  Maybe I need to change my attitude or something.  For sure I meet the odd knob but not often enough to ruin my day.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

This concern for Thomson won’t change the script

This concern for Thomson won’t change the script

Under pressure himself over his crusade against Craig Thomson, Tony Abbott has moved to present a softer…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter