If our linguistically challenged forefathers had the option to Tweet their grunts and moans, I’m almost certainly positive they would.

OK, maybe not. But I’m sure cavemen and women used to lay awake at night, stone and chisel in hand, thinking about the self-absorbed things they could etch for people in far away villages they would probably never meet.

Hi, my name is (@newsbee) Lanai – and I’m a Twitterholic.

For those of you who aren’t in the know, Twitter is the nifty little “social network” that allows you to vomit anything into cyberspace 140 characters or less at a time. It’s the micro-blog of all blogs, the ‘it’ party of web 2.0 and it’s basically net suicide if you’re not on it.

But at the risk of offending all my Tweeps and Twibes out there - there’s just nothing “social” about Twitter. Sure people are talking, and the communication can often go both ways but unlike Facebook and MySpace you don’t actually have to know the people you’re talking to. Chances are most of the time they’re not listening anyway.

Twitter is just one giant echo chamber for egotistical lonely people who want to tell the world their every thought 140 characters at a time. It’s self-promotion at its most shameless level.

It’s the 21st century ego-boosting equivalent of, well actually, it’s like nothing ever before it. Twitter helps those insecure celebrities and everyday people alike believe the number of “followers” they have equates to how important they are in real-life. It’s an excuse to shout into the darkness and randomly brag about the most mundane uneventful happenings in your life hoping someone else will actually care about what you have to say.

And you know what - I’m positively, absolutely 100 per cent addicted to it.

Think crack cocaine in the eighties, Hannah Montana for 13-somethings and Twilight’s Edward Cullen for possibly every vampire-loving slut and virgin on the planet and you haven’t even touched the void on how addictive Twitter can be.

Just over a year ago I had absolutely no idea what Twitter was. I remember looking at our Technology reporter’s computer screen and thinking “what the hell is that freaky little bird site and why is this person continuously checking it?”.

Now, I CAN’T STOP TWEETING. More often than not I find myself thinking in Tweets. Or thinking to myself “how could I put that into 140 characters or less?”. People at work have mentioned things around me and then seriously turned in my direction and said “Don’t Tweet that Lanai”.

Apart from news updates and commentary, my Twitter musings often include the type of food I’m eating, my thoughts on the opposite sex and the weird and wacky things I see in my everyday life

I’m a massive RT-er (Re-Tweet-er) and every now and then I’ll throw in a foreign language Tweet just to keep things interesting.

Honestly, I’m obsessed. I’m like a heroin addict. Forget about Trainspotting, it’s all about Twitterspotting for me. Requiem for a Tweet anyone?

My first twitter hit was on October 15, 2008 at precisely 13:19:45 (AEST). At last count I was “following” 347 “people”, had 811 “followers” and had clocked up 2157 “updates”. That’s on average 10 a day, every day, since I started. I can tell you now it hasn’t been that constant – and some days I’ve posted more than 20 tweets in the space of 24 hours.

Over the past week I’ve tried to stick to a self-imposed Twitter ban during work hours. A good friend at work (who is also on Twitter) and I agreed four Tweets between the hours of 9am-5pm was the maximum allowed.

Trust me when I say it’s been an ENORMOUS struggle. There have been times when all I’ve wanted was Amy Winehouse to (crawl out of her hole) come back from vacation in St. Lucia and back me up on Twitter rehab “no, no, no”.

But in the end I know I need to escape the clutches of this pseudo-social network that has me like a hungry killer python’s prey.

Now, before you all start “un-following” me, I’m not bashing Twitter completely. I think it definitely has its uses, and is absolutely revolutionary when it comes to news reporting.

Twitter has allowed journalists to make contact with people and break news events in ways that just simply weren’t possible before. The Mumbai terror attacks, Hudson River plane crash, US and Iran elections, Victoria fires and countless other events have been brought to life because of Twitter.

But the same colleague who brought Twitter into my life recently pointed out to me that while it has sped up and facilitated the spread of news it has also been useful in the spread of lies. 

Hello???? How can we forget Channel 9’s entertainment (phoney) journalist, Richard Wilkins, reporting on live TV that Hollywood actor Jeff Goldblum had fallen off a cliff in New Zealand and died. The reports turned out to be fake Twitter hype but I guess Wilko hasn’t caught onto exactly what Twitter is all about huh?.

When it gets to the point where you’re so starved for attention you tell complete strangers on Twitter how good the cupcakes you’re eating “right now” are. Or you’re that hard pressed to find a good book publisher you decide to Tweet your entire novel – I think it’s time to put down the needle and consider that jabbing your keyboard is not the way to live anymore.

Maybe we all just need to get back to a good old cup of tea and a chinwag.

21 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Sharie says:

      09:32am | 20/07/09

      SO wrong. Twitter helps us all be connected to the world so much more.

      Maybe Lanai you’re an egotistical person - but I’m certainly not.

    • Nathaniel says:

      10:59am | 20/07/09

      I can understand you’re addicted to Twitter, but I think it’s very condescending to compare it to Heroin or Cocain. I hardly think it has you stealing from your friends, wandering the streets looking for your next ‘Tweet’ fix. Drug addiction is a big problem, I don’t think it’s fair to compare it to some social networking fad.

      As for the whole Twitter thing, I think it’s being blown way out of proportion by the media and the like. I think the media realised they missed the boat on the whole Myspace and Facebook thing, saw Twitter coming, and jumped on the bandwagon. Apart from 30/40-something’s trying to keep up with the ‘latest’ technology, and celebrities riding twitter all the way to bigger paycheques - not to mention politicians trying to be ‘cool’, i mean really, Kevin Rudd does not need a twitter - there’s no-one really on there with the means of forsight to actaully say anything worthwhile.

      Twitter is the perfect example of why we shouldn’t put a microphone infront of every person and his dog who wants to stand on a soapbox.

    • Pants says:

      11:02am | 20/07/09

      I agree with Sharie.
      Many people (and myself included) use Twitter to stay connected to friends interstate and overseas in real-time. We’re not lonely people at all and certainly not ego-driven!

      There are a lot of unscrupulous users out there who believe the service is one big spammy marketing tool for them to flog their wares and promote their business to anyone who’ll follow them, but they’re definitely not indicative of the larger portion of us using Twitter for what it was designed.

      My husband and friends use it to keep in touch, let each other know what’s happening in our little sphere up to the minute and even share photos. This is something we’ve been doing since 2007!

      Because it’s a negative experience for you, please don’t tar us all with the same brush.

    • Chris says:

      11:08am | 20/07/09

      Twitter is a way to let their friends know what they are doing incase anyone is interested.

      For example - if I tweet that I am currently reading your article and strongly disagree with what you have written.. a friend of mine who follows my tweets might see that and may end up reading your article as well and may or may not agree… that person may have even been reading that same article and also agree or disagree.

      My mum follows me on twitter and tells me that she loves reading about stuff that I do in my day to day life because it helps her feel connected to me. And vice versa.

      How is an old chinwag between two people over coffee any less egotistical than posting something on twitter? Think about all the face to face conversations where you have to listen to someone name drop or talk themselves up while you politely smile and not?

      I believe that twitter takes away the bullshit by forcing you to say something in 140 characters or less.

      You are obviously do not understand social networking and should not write about things you clearly do not know about.

    • Peter says:

      12:01pm | 20/07/09

      Whist I understand the point you are trying to make, I must disagree with the analogy. Like anything in life one must pick through the rubbish to find the good stuff.

      No media, no tool, no environment (online or not) is perfect.

      It’s not unlike reading news.com.au. There are days in which I have to sort through tabloid based articles that leave me rolling my eyes, to pick out the “real news”.

      Other days there’s a wealth of great news on news.com.au.

      It can sway from bordering on an embarrassment to being an amazingly useful place to obtain one’s news. Twitter is not dis-similar.

      If you weed through the “I just put the dog out” stuff, to the more handy “I just heard on the news that a tsunami may be on the way”, twitter can be the most useful tool around. It provides a voice to those who really aren’t newsworthy. It provides a platform via which normal everyday people can interact, offer advice and indeed contribute.

      Unlike the comments section on a news site, you can weed out the idiots and have total control over who you follow. Eventually you can gain a circle of contacts via which you can gain what you desire from Twitter. I don’t believe there is another platform out there that gives you this capability to this extent.

      From a personal perspective I’ve made contacts, formed friendships, gained exposure via Twitter. I’d put a dollar value of what I’ve gained from Twitter exposure at probably about $50,000 in the past 6 months. And it’s all free!! Establishing the @BlokesLib twitter name was probably one of the most business savvy things I’ve done in years. I wish Twitter was around a few years ago.

      I believe, like most things, it must be kept in perspective. Used with a degree of common sense it can be a handy tool indeed. Go over the top and it’s probably as destructive as other addictions.

      Long live Twitter

    • harry says:

      12:07pm | 20/07/09

      Is it okay to just call you twit.

    • Courtney says:

      12:59pm | 20/07/09

      I love Twitter! If it wasn’t for that “little” website I wouldn’t have met a whole bunch of really great people. I don’t care if people think I’m a “twit”.

    • Dnee says:

      01:03pm | 20/07/09

      Nathaniel says: “there’s no-one really on there with the means of forsight to actaully say anything worthwhile”
      You’re obviously not following the right people.

    • Seth says:

      01:05pm | 20/07/09

      Is this meant to be satirical?

    • Lanai Vasek says:

      01:07pm | 20/07/09

      @Chris Wow - your Mum is on Twitter! That’s impressive.

      Why can’t she just call you everyday to see what you’ve been up to though? Wouldn’t that be more personal, or don’t you care what she has to say?

      This is a great little video that sums up my argument in animated form.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PN2HAroA12w

      My point is that Twitter actually ISN’T a social network. Everyone is just shouting in the darkness and vomiting information in 140-characters-or-less sized parcels.

      I would advocate that Twitter actually INCREASES the amount of “bullshit”. Chances are in face-to-face interactions you’re not going to say half the irrelevant things you would purge into the Twittersphere.

      I love Twitter - and I’m absolutely addicted to it. But I’m also aware of what it is - and what it reflects about me.

      My challenge for you is to see if you could stop Tweeting for a week and still be able to keep up with the important things going on in your friends lives.

      My bets are you would - you’d just know a lot less about their dietary needs.

      What’s your Twitter name by the way? I’d love to follow you.

    • Alan Watson says:

      01:08pm | 20/07/09

      yaaaaan

    • stephen says:

      02:12pm | 20/07/09

      ...first syllable babe.

    • ken says:

      03:04pm | 20/07/09

      Lania, you say that it is like nothing else before it. Well, it’s the electronic version of the CB radio without the physical contact (now that was one hell of a social networking era of the ‘70’s). Twittering is like a massive exchange of information for no reason at all. Are there really thousands of people out there wanting to know what colour socks you are wearing today because of the mood you are in, which of course you have just informed everyone of? I did sign up, I did try it, I did get bored of it very quickly. Each to their own I guess. I just hope that people don’t become ‘cyber hermits’ and glue themselves to their PC’s, laptops and mobile phones alienating themselves from the real world. Hang on . . . that’s already happening!

    • Abby says:

      03:07pm | 20/07/09

      I still don’t get twitter. I use it and follow people on it - people follow me. I just don’t understand the need for the constant updating, why is it so important to let people know you’re eating an apple THEN to follow it up with the apple is good?!

      Our business is looking into creating an account for the shop and updating on our new top picks and best sellers and so on. But i am reserved about the whole thing. Would it really be benificial for a bookshop to indulge in something like this? Is it going to generate profits or just waste time?

    • Gina says:

      04:28pm | 20/07/09

      Ken I completely agree with you - young folk these days just need to interact with the real world and get off those damn computers.

    • T says:

      03:01pm | 21/07/09

      The twubble with Twitter is that unless you have people who are interested and follow you, its basically a waste of time.  I might post that I’m currently reading X book, but unless someone says to me “oh that book is crappy” or “that book is good”, or strikes up something of a conversation, no one cares.
      Seriously, it is like yelling into a dark field and hoping someone responds.  I dont care what I’m doing, I’m the one doing it.  (i dont really care if others care what I’m doing either tbh).  This isnt limited to Twitter either, it just gets the hype, the same problem exists on Facebook, except you can track other people’s conversations better on facebook status updates, because it links them together.  I havent used Myspace so I dont know if that has a similar feature.

      I think these things are great when they work, if you have regular followers and people communicate to each other, of for family members, whatever, but the media shouldnt hype it into the new social communication revolution because it isnt.

      Unfortunately the Internet as a whole screams with ‘who cares?’ syndrome.

    • Cly says:

      11:10pm | 21/07/09

      There’s a whole world out there and you choose to Twitter so often? Wow. Sucks to be you.

    • hellonathan says:

      07:19am | 22/07/09

      Back in my day if people had something intelligent to say, it usually took more than 140 characters. In fact we used words instead of characters. And we’d put them in things called books, newspapers, magazines, journals and websites/blogs.

      Twitter reminds me of a line from a song. Am I getting stupider?

    • Reg says:

      09:30am | 22/07/09

      Lanai, I can’t read all that don’t-chew-no. All twitters are attention seekers but not I, I’m immune from such vain-glorious pursuits. Sharie may think she’s connecting to the world, but the world’s not listening. A little like the loon baying at the moon.

    • Damien says:

      12:55pm | 22/07/09

      Lanai….please get a life.
      Twitter is redicluous. No one cares that you ‘just made toast and it tastes great!!!’ Its worse than the facebook status update.
      At least youve admitted how egotistical you are to think anyone would care about the stupid little updates made 10 times a day.
      I wish you well in your recovery.

    • girard perregaux says:

      07:31pm | 12/05/10

      Well done is better than extravagantly said.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

This concern for Thomson won’t change the script

This concern for Thomson won’t change the script

Under pressure himself over his crusade against Craig Thomson, Tony Abbott has moved to present a softer…

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter