The first mummy blogger I ever read was a woman called Ree Drummond. A city girl from California who went to live on a cattle ranch in Ohio, when she met and married the man of her dreams, who also happened to be a cowboy.


Her photographs and willingness to share ALL the details of life on a ranch sucked me right in. That was four years ago and since then Drummond has gone on to have her own television show and a cookbook that made the top of the New York Times bestseller list. Now there are women like Drummond everywhere, including the approximately 200 or so currently blogging in Australia.

While that seems like a relatively small number, Aussie mummy bloggers have an impressive span of influence. Some people have described them as a “new social demographic” and they’ve even caught the eye of Julia Gillard, who invited a select few to have tea at Kirribilli House last month.

The phrase “mummy blogger” is a collective term for blogs written by women about life and motherhood, but you don’t necessarily have to be a woman or a mother to read or enjoy them. Although, it probably helps. People who consider themselves to be more “serious” bloggers often use the word in a derogatory manner.

The secret of the mummy blogger success story is simple: they know their audience back to front. And that’s mostly because they are their market: mothers busy raising families and living in the real world.

Conversation on these blogs spans everything from their own marriage, to washing, eating, cooking, shopping, friendship, babies and everything else in between. The worst are like sharing a cup of coffee with a needy neighbour, while the best are intimate, with the added voyeuristic pleasure of taking a peek into someone else’s life, warts and all.

Little wonder mummy bloggers have become an increasing target of Australian marketing companies, keen to take advantage of their influence and appeal by plying them with freebies in exchange for a plug on their website. 

It’s a method that’s gone completely gangbusters in America where some of the biggest brands spend up to three quarters of a billion dollars spruiking to the approximately four million women contributing to the mummy-blogosphere.

Here in Australia, mummy bloggers intercept anything from beauty products, car leases and baby food to interstate and sometimes overseas flights. Lucky them. Who wouldn’t jump at the chance to fly to New York, spend a weekend in the country side or feast on various types of chocolate biscuits in exchange for telling your friends about it online? Not me, that’s for sure. But not everyone agrees.

A growing group of Australian mummy bloggers have started to feel stigmatised by the reaction of some people to their foray into to the advertising world.

Veronica Foale is one of them. She has run her blog somedaywewillsleep.com for the last five years. She wrote a recent post expressing frustration at the accusations made by certain people that mummy bloggers are unethical in their approach to writing posts sponsored by advertising companies and were “selling out”.

Particular points of contention included the a piece written by Julian Lee that included a quote from an Addisons lawyer about the legal “grey area” mummy bloggers were crossing in receiving what she described as substantial non-monetary benefits.

And a blog she believes was allegedly started by Helen Razer called The Sponsored Lady that satirises the relationship between PR companies and mummy bloggers.

Foale admits that the criticism and satire are an expected part of having an online personality. But she resents the insinuation that mummy bloggers are unethical in their treatment of sponsored posts and can’t be taken seriously.

“The truth is mummy bloggers are agenda-free. Marketing companies are attracted to us because our readers trust that we only recommend something that we really like. That’s what they expect. As long as we work with integrity we have the right to be heard and be an accepted part of the media landscape,” she told The Punch.

Foale says she has good working relationship with around five or six PR companies, and gets a package in the mail at least once a month. She is under no obligation to write about anything receives and the income she does receives from any posts she does write is just “pocket money”.

She also said that mummy bloggers deserve to be treated in the same way technology and food bloggers who are free to endorse products without scrutiny. Good point.

It’s hard to find any overwhelming evidence to suggest a huge backlash against sponsored mummy bloggers posts outside of Twitter and the responses to the Lee article. Mostly because these blogs, by definition, cater to a pretty niche, albeit increasingly influential market.

That growth is the most interesting part of this chapter in the Australian mummy blogger story. As the popularity of their online communities continue to grow, so will the opportunities for commodification - and our army of mummy bloggers should snap them right up.

Eventually the haters will just fall to the wayside. Otherwise, do as your mother told you, and just ignore them.

Follow me on Twitter: @lucyjk

Most commented

52 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • acotrel says:

      06:25am | 30/06/12

      Well, whatever blows your hair back !

    • Tim says:

      06:39am | 30/06/12

      Byestella.com is my favourite mummy blog. It typifies the genre with raw honesty and a willingness to discuss any and all topics. Its also written by a good friend.

    • pa_kelvin says:

      01:21pm | 30/06/12

      @Tim   Good plug.grin

    • cheap white trash says:

      07:54am | 30/06/12

      Are Mummy bloggers related to Hummy Mummies?Please…..

    • Michellemac says:

      09:37am | 30/06/12

      I have a good friend who is a mummy blogger in the UK. I am astounded at just how often PR companies approach her and how little they want to pay her.

      In new media the cost per thousand argument is different to the old mass market FMCG companies targetting household grocery buyers…and the very nature of mummy blogging is intimate and confessional so monetizing that relationship is a difficult area. I would imagine the brand recognition and cut through would be much stronger than a 30 second ad during a day time soap so there should be adequate return for the blogger.

      My friend gets around it by saying her posts were courtesy of her sponsor….usually she is trying out a toy or a household gadget. I see no difference between this and journalists on women’s magazines getting the latest clothes or cosmetics to write about.

    • Annalie says:

      10:30am | 30/06/12

      Yep to all of that. However there are plenty of bloggers - or perhaps just people with a free blogspace - literally begging for free stuff or a bit of cash for a sponsored post. And that’s worth satirising.

    • JS says:

      10:50am | 30/06/12

      can we put a ban on labelling people as a “mummy” anything. that word makes my skin crawl, it is SO patronising.

      Please say no to mummy blogger, yummy mummy, mummy porn…......

    • pa_kelvin says:

      01:27pm | 30/06/12

      Is it okay if I still call my mum mummy?  What about Prince Charles doesn’t he call the Queen, Mummy???  ;-b

    • Michelle says:

      01:39pm | 30/06/12

      Absolutely! The term “mummy insert popular culture genre” reeks of bored, condescending pop culture guardians. That’s at least according to my sisters and friends who themselves have children. A classic example is the term “mummy porn” (porn is evil, EVIL, I tell you….unless we MOTHERS have validated it!).  Using the prefix ‘mummy’ in an attempt to define something as being hip or exciting only comes across as incredibly lame and dumbed down, in a “but if MOTHERS have collectively given their approval and endorsement, then it MUST be worthy!”  The mums at work refer to these blogs as “internet white bread” (bland, lacking in creative and intellectual fibre, thereby constipating the net!).

    • js says:

      01:48pm | 30/06/12

      @pa_kelvin answer, no. once you turn 13 you can never use the word mummy ever again (unless you are refering to the ancient egytian kind)

    • lee says:

      02:37pm | 30/06/12

      YES! What is with this mummy-fying everything?

      I get that in this instance, it is probably not quite as bad- we are talking about mothers writing essentially parenting blogs, but mummy porn, yummy mummy etc- really?

      Ugh, I really thought we had moved passed defining women by their motherhood (or lack thereof). Guess not.

      (and pa_kevin, I hope you are joking, coz a grown man calling their mother “mummy” is plain creepy)

    • Ben says:

      04:00pm | 30/06/12

      oh dear someone said mummy…. better fire up the whhaambulance

    • pa_kelvin says:

      07:02pm | 30/06/12

      @js Ok i’ll have to stop.smile  Better tell Charlie too as well. @lee Just a bit of light humour on the last day before EFO.

    • Singular Insanity says:

      11:10am | 30/06/12

      Well said, Lucy.  The backlash may only appear small to those outside our community, but it is felt very strongly by all of us.  It is sad that it is women who are turning against other women to ridicule and belittle them.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      12:02pm | 30/06/12

      Mummy bloggers can kiss my ass. They already get the handouts from the government, so what’s their problem?

    • Mummy Blogger says:

      09:14pm | 30/06/12

      Government handouts? I must have missed mine. Sweeping, ignorant generalisation much?

    • pa_kelvin says:

      11:15pm | 30/06/12

      @SFM   Do you own a donkey?  Hope you have a big backyard.smile

    • Mrs Woog says:

      09:38am | 02/07/12

      Jeez, they must have list my address.

    • By Estella Dot Com says:

      05:13pm | 02/07/12

      What’s YOUR problem? I am a mother who coincidentally blogs, who receives NO government handouts whatsoever. That’s right. NO part A, B, rent assistance, large family allowance, Newstart allowance etc. I did NOT even get Kevin’s free money when it was going around either. Check your facts before you high-handedly start accusing people of things you know nothing about . FYI what people choose to do with their time is their own business.

    • Anna says:

      12:23pm | 30/06/12

      “mothers busy raising families and living in the real world.”

      They can’t be that busy if they have enough free time to write pointless blog entries about shopping and the consistency of baby poop.

    • not a plug says:

      02:37pm | 30/06/12

      So Anna, are you saying that mothers deserve no time to themselves??
      I am a Mum who blogs.  I also work full time.  I also have a PhD and at one point I was studying full-time with two children under the age of 6.  Blogging gave me an outlet for MYSELF that I otherwise wouldn’t have had.  ...and no, my blog isn’t about poo and shopping. 
      FTR I’ve done some hard jobs in my time - from farm labouring to managing multi-million dollar projects but not one of those jobs is anywhere near as full-on as motherhood.

    • lee says:

      02:41pm | 30/06/12

      Oh cmon now Anna! Harsh much?

      What is it with this idea that if mothers have time to do anything other than chase their child around cleaning up after them- they must be lazy etc.

      What do you want? Them working 24 hours a day? Do you? Surely you have some down time in your day- you know, to do things like read this blog and then write a comment…

    • Anna says:

      03:38pm | 30/06/12

      Obviously touched a nerve there…

    • marley says:

      04:43pm | 30/06/12

      @Anna - unless you’re a journalist running a site like The Punch, the same principle applies to any blogger - it’s a spare time thing.  I don’t know any adults who don’t have spare time in their life - bloggers just use it differently from people who spend it watching TV, playing football, going to the opera or doing whatever it is that rocks your own socks.

    • Mummy Blogger says:

      09:16pm | 30/06/12

      Who the f*ck writes about shopping and consistency of poop? Seriously. Name me one.

      And poo to us for finding something we like doing and doing it, IN OUR FREE TIME!

    • Astrid says:

      12:32pm | 30/06/12

      Started following mummy blogs years ago before the sponsors got hold of them.  Many a good blog has been ruined by it.  No problem with a mum who comes across something they love, but loath the posts that start off nattering about how hard school lunches can be, then bang the product name placement is there, then followed by a giveaway. 

      Since that there are few that I follow these days.  Yes, they have lots of followers, but is it due the actual content, or the possibility of getting something free?

      To me it has taken away the essence of what blogs are about.

    • Tahlia says:

      05:36pm | 30/06/12

      Polarising again are we ???  Bet no one would dare to criticise “refugee blogger” or “ethnic minority blogger” and demand they don’t sell out for a chocolate biscuit.  But sticking the boots into mummy blogger is clearly the must have accessory of the season, particularly for female journalists which is somewhat ironic.
        Frankly it makes me laugh to read the guff produced by so called “writers” who are so obviously threatened by Sally suburbia reviewing a stick on hook or brand of yoghurt because the daisy domestic is clearly perceived as a credible recipient of the advertising budget and a clear and present threat to mainstream media in general.

    • Gordon says:

      07:52pm | 30/06/12

      Person-kinds eternal search to find new ways to sell you shit…

    • carla brown says:

      10:25pm | 30/06/12

      I agree with Anna in a way, mommy bloggers that I have come across seem to be so judgemental and have a pack mentality, if anyone disagrees with what they say you have at least a handful jump in and attack you. I agree that everyone has a right to express themselves how ever like but when a blogger seems to have the time to sit behind their computer and blog, tweet facebook etc for hours each day I begin to ask the question how much quality time are they spending with their children and family. The bloggers who work I dont have a big problem with its the so called stay at home mommy bloggers who can spend so much time not paying attention to their children but cant seem to go out and work using up tax payers money to sit behind a computer all day. I agree that there are some good bloggers out there but mommy bloggers are the ones who exclude and victimise victimize themselves.

    • Mid 30s Life says:

      11:14pm | 30/06/12

      Not everyone likes blogs, and that’s fair enough.  Ignore them if you don’t.  But don’t get your knickers in a knot over us “mummy bloggers” getting the odd freebie.  As a blogger (who is also a mother, therefore a “mummy blogger” - ugh!), if I do write about something I’ve been given it’s fully disclosed.  I’m certain 99% of bloggers do the same.

    • Kaz says:

      11:59pm | 30/06/12

      I just hope they are declaring the value of all these “free” things received in return for their services to the tax department and paying tax on them - otherwise we will soon have the new term “mummy auditor”.

    • Lucy says:

      12:13am | 01/07/12

      it doesn’t matter whether you blog on technology or food, everyone should declare any sponsorship or conflicts of interest.

    • Harry Q. Hammer says:

      07:24am | 01/07/12

      “mummy” is in; “gate” is so passe.

    • A Bloke says:

      11:01am | 01/07/12

      Not a huge fan of the ‘mummy blogger’ genre, but then again I’m a bloke and don’t expect I’m the target audience.
      Still, the backlash against these women trying to write about themselves or their lives really does irk me. Good on them for having a go at learning to write well, hopefully it will rub off on their kids.
      And goodness me, some of them try to supplement their income from it to be made a mockery of… by ‘professional’ writers? Yes, I’m looking at you http://www.sponsoredlady.com - Why shouldn’t women have the ability to earn something on their own terms. It’s possibly one of the few ‘jobs’ they can have with flexible work hours that suits them. As long as, just with any article on any website/newspaper/TV show, any sponsorship is clearly indicated… WHO CARES.
      GIRL POWER!

    • Jaydee says:

      02:35pm | 01/07/12

      That is because some of the blogs are better written and more interesting than “some” of the professional journalists work. Falls under the “how dare she, I’m the professional. As to anything with “mummy” in the title, it is just another way to put mothers down as being air headed bimbos.

    • Mid 30s Life says:

      05:44pm | 01/07/12

      Well said.  On behalf of mummy bloggers (although I still can’t stand that expression) everywhere - thanks. X

    • BB says:

      11:10am | 01/07/12

      Love Ree. Love Veronica. Bloggers are as diverse as our community.  It amuses me that we need to constantly label everything - usually says more about the labeller than the labelee.  (New label there? Heh).

      Don’t know what category I fall into - I just know I love sharing my part of the world and those who choose to visit me seem to enjoy it too.  Am yet to be offered a serious ‘freebie’ but certainly don’t begrduge those who do, as LONG as it doesn’t affect how they blog.  Like any kind of media - alienate your audience and you will lose it.

      Getting a giggle from some comments here.  I guarantee not to talk about human poo on my blog. Cow poo however…
      grin
      BB

    • Gerry says:

      01:26pm | 01/07/12

      Mummy bloggers are, almost without exception, women with low self esteem, a lot of spare time, few to no real life friends, and limited in their understanding of how well they’re being played by the corporate world.

      In summary, very dull people.

    • Mummy blogger fan says:

      03:37pm | 01/07/12

      And you are the expert of course how very sad to be you

    • marley says:

      04:00pm | 01/07/12

      And those who get their kicks out of denigrating people they don’t know for writing blogs they don’t read are obviously wonderfully interesting and self-assured people with exciting lives.  Or perhaps not.

    • Jaydee says:

      05:33pm | 01/07/12

      As opposed to “other” people with a seemingly very small man complex, grandiose ideas of his/her own importance and an utter bore to anyone but himself/herself. Oh you don’t think this accurately describes you? Funny but this is how you “Gerry” come across. Dont like it? Then perhaps you may think twice before you write such a condescending piece of drivel.

    • Mrs Woog says:

      09:35am | 02/07/12

      Classic. You are totally wring of course. I know dozens of bloggers in real life, and not one of them falls under your perceptions. Not one. Those dozens must come under your “almost without exception” group.

    • Sandra says:

      04:57pm | 02/07/12

      Amen Gerry! I asked my fellow mummy-workmates (sorry about the use of ‘mummy’) about so-called mummy-blogs and they too described those bloggers as “bored, dull, isolated” as well as “inabilty to communicate face to face” and so on, and so on. Mind you, when not with their husband or kids, the women with whom I work with do a lot of charity or volunteer work, are active in sports or art/reading/music/gardening clubs, or do short courses run via the local universities, so have wide circles of friends.  I asked my three daughters what they thought, their response was “gawd mum, we’d be soooooo embarrassed if you started a mummy-blog!”.

    • TJ Wylde says:

      05:32pm | 01/07/12

      The comment that the mummy blogger should be treated like other blogger is the one thing I can’t take seriously, I’ve read tech and food blogs that give absolutely scathing reports of the free product they where given that don’t pass their tests or even are just too damn expensive. I haven’t read anything but praise for any or the products that mummy bloggers go on about, this means either the PR people are perfectly right everytime or the mummy bloggers are soft on the freebies and treat all reviews of products they do as paid advertising without any of the guidelines for actually telling the truth advertisers need to stick to.

    • Toushka Lee says:

      08:46pm | 01/07/12

      most of the bloggers I know, myself included, just don’t write about a product if we don’t like it. If we get sent freebies, we have no obligation to write about it. The products we like, or may be of some interest to our readers, get the coverage on the blog.
      I’ve been hired to write about a product but it did not work for me at all so I turned the job down.
      I’m happy to tell anyone in public forums that the product was not good for me, but I’m not taking their money to do so. And I would never lie about it.
      What I’m getting tired of is the generalisations - “mummy bloggers do this. All mummy bloggers do that.”
      Mummy bloggers are as diverse as any other group of people that share a title.

    • TJ Wylde says:

      09:03am | 02/07/12

      ICB on that excuse that mummy bloggers don’t write about products that they don’t like, not writing about something that you don’t like means your having your silence paid for and makes mummy bloggers look even softer and I can see why PR companies love them, you can give a mummy blogger a product and if they like it you get free advertising and if the mummy blogger doesn’t like it you don’t get a bad review because they won’t write anything about it. This habit makes it difficult for a reader to know if their likes and dislikes align with the writer because all they ever get is good reviews. To paraphrase, when good reviewers only write good reviews, then bad products triumph.

    • Helen says:

      08:59pm | 01/07/12

      Mummy bloggers write glowingly about their free stuff, can’t take them seriously. Plus they have such a sense of blogger entitlement and just moan about any media they get not realising if it wasn’t for the media they wouldn’t get those freebies they all love so much.

    • Hey, I blog too! says:

      10:00pm | 01/07/12

      So if you are a good looking mum who blogs about porn, does that make you a ‘Yummy Mummy Porn Blogger’?..

    • B says:

      11:38pm | 01/07/12

      I totally turned off a blog after a 2000 word essay on how “amaze balls” KFC are.  I’m offended that pr companies think we can’t read through the rot.  No KFC I do not buy that you think you can buy us via Bloggers, you’re product is unhealthy.  I’m sorry that bloggers feel to earn in income they have to sell their soul to the devil.  And the PM chat?  No Julia you are not going to buy me with that either!!

    • Tam @ NearlyNotQuite says:

      04:37am | 02/07/12

      I’m a mum, I blog. I loathe the name “Mummy-Blogger”.

    • Kate says:

      10:49am | 02/07/12

      Good on these women for having a voice and creating a community and income that fits with their busy roles as mums. However, some within their ranks are doing them a disservice with their approach to money making. Their are others setting standards though and the criticisms and generalisations made here are crazy - eg that they all have low self esteem or are collecting handouts. Weird. Also, finding the line of how much they reveal publicly about others is challenge. A child can’t provide informed consent re having their photo and life issues used for blog posts. Mia Freedman wrote an interesting column about this in yesterday’s The Sunday Telegraph - .http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/wheres-your-online-privacy-line/story-e6frezz0-1226413151897

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter