On 23 November Richard Fleming of the Global Poverty Project wrote an article on the Punch entitled “You don’t have to be a brain surgeon to rejuvenate a life”.

Krishna and Trishna's birth parents at their home in Bangladesh. Pic by AFP.

I think it is perhaps fair to say that I am more deeply involved with the beautiful journey of Trishna and Krishna than Richard. 

While I cannot avoid discussing the twins, my response is aimed at the broader issues of development and poverty Richard raises in his article rather than focusing only on the unique story of Trishna and Krishna.

It is fair to say that for everyone concerned, the benefits of involvement with the miraculous experience of the twins has been far more than any cost-benefit analysis would show. 

The hospital has achieved international recognition as a pioneering pediatric institute. The medical staff have had a once in a lifetime career opportunity to develop knowledge and skills that will enable them to help save the lives of other children in the future.

Moira Kelly and her foundation have been given media attention and public support that will assist her in bringing countless children unlucky enough to be born in countries without medical services to Australia for life-saving operations.

The Australian public is inspired to do good by a news story other than our appalling treatment of asylum seekers or the failure of our leaders to do something about climate change. 

And of course, Trishna and Krishna have been given the ultimate gift – life – which is certainly something money can’t buy.

So, to try and reduce the experience of the twins to economics is naïve and simplistic.  In much the same way that saying dollars will fix poverty is uninspired.

To compare the cost of clean water and sanitation with the amount of money spent on cosmetic surgery in the USA in any one year is about as useless as comparing the number of children who could be immunized for the same cost as the twins’ separation. 

The fact remains that people were willing to spend time and money on the twins but if I had approached those same people and asked them to donate that same amount of money to immunize thousands of faceless children in Bangladesh, they would not have supported me. 

The money spent on the twins surgery did not take resources away from other deserving children.  There was no simple tick box questionnaire with the option of reducing this question of cost to a simple moral question of prioritizing the lives of many over the lives of two. 

To claim that helping the millions of people who live in abject poverty survive is less complex than what has been achieved for the twins is not only condescending.  It is wrong.

Topping up bank accounts will not ‘solve’ the crisis of poverty.  We need to do much more than that.  $9 billion alone will not bring clean water and sanitation to the world’s poorest. 

That may build the infrastructure, but who, then, will train the local communities on how to service their new toilet when it breaks, who will teach them more general messages about hygiene, who will build new toilets as populations grow and more people need services? 

Money alone, without skills, technical assistance, research and ongoing support, is counterproductive.

Lack of clean water and adequate sanitation is the cause, but not the root cause, of more child deaths than malaria, HIV/AIDS and measles combined. 

The root cause is the lack of capacity in governments, institutions and individuals, to address poverty in a holistic way.

The root cause is the lack of an education system to produce well-trained doctors and nurses, the lack of a national health institute that prioritises primary and preventative health care for women and children, it is the lack of infrastructure that means people can’t get to the hospital (if there is one) because there are no roads, no public transport systems, no telephones. 

We can’t keep relying on technical solutions to problems of poverty.  History has shown this does not work.

Most commented

8 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      08:23am | 25/11/09

      The root cause is the corruption of third world governments and their officials, who steal aid money and supplies for themselves. The root cause is a culture of superstition and tribalism which has the world’s poor killing and maiming each other instead of working to build, as the successful societies have done. The root cause is overpopulation.

      On another note, you say “the lack of a national health institute that prioritises primary and preventative health care for women and children” is a problem. Why do you hate men?

    • Liz says:

      08:26am | 25/11/09

      Gosh well good the twins have ben useful in their short lives already!! I suppose you also think the loss of their parents,country and culture will be a good thing too? We’re talking about two vulnerable babies without choice here where’s your hunanity?

    • Annabel says:

      11:49am | 25/11/09

      @Eric Danielle doesn’t hate men because she believes in helping the marginalised population (women) in impverished nations.

      @Liz i’m sure they would have been happier living out their lives joined at the head - where’s your humanity?

      We do need a holistic approach to fixing poverty - education is the key, knowledge is power. We also need to look in our own backyard and address the need to bridge the gap. Culturally specific programmes would go a long way, rather than just throwing money at the problem.

    • Annabel says:

      11:57am | 25/11/09

      @Eric - Promoting women’s health and wellbeing isn’t about hating men, it’s about protecting the marginalised in the most impoverished nations.

      @Liz - you’re right, we should have left them in a orphanage joined at the head. giving them the chance to lead a normal, active and healthy life is inhumane.

      We also need to bridge the gap in our own backyard, education is the key, knowledge is power. Culturally specific programmes are much more effective than throwing cash at a problem. Now to convince the policy makers!!!

    • Brad says:

      01:07pm | 25/11/09

      She’s a Man-hater, make you work more
      Make you spend more
      Make you want all, of her love.

    • Ken Evenden says:

      01:47pm | 25/11/09

      Wrong Danielle , it is all about money.  I am sure you are aware that the UN frequently calls upon member-states to increase their development assistance budgets to meet the Millenium Development Goals.  As you would also be aware Australia has commited to a target of 0.5 of GNI by 2015 (Many countries have gone further).  The mechanisms you detailed as necessary to combine with money to provide effective relief (skills, technical assistance, research and ongoing support), strangely enough all require more money.

      I think you may be confusing your feelings withthe real issues.  For you, it isn’t all about money as I am sure you find satisfaction in giving an orphan a hug, but for the kids money is everything.  Money buys the schools, the vaccines, the sanitation systems and most importnatly money pays for people to upskill and to teach others their new skills.

      While I am sure your hugs are as soft as a Pelicans and would not underestimate the comfort they could bring, they will never take the place of money and we are negligent if we suggest that money isnt everything when we are rescuing others from the depths of poverty.

    • AW says:

      02:41pm | 25/11/09

      I think Danielle conflates a few issues here.

      There is nothing wrong with people donating money for the separation of the twins or for the institute to gain valuable experience.  Also, as Danielle noted, philanthropy isn’t a zero-sum game and it is close to ‘impossible’ to apply a cost-benefit analysis on the separation surgery. Indeed, giving them life is ‘priceless’. This is where she should’ve left it.

      But, Danielle then goes on to argue that the same people who gave money for the surgery wouldn’t pay for the immunisation of ‘faceless’ children in Bangladesh. That’s ridiculous. Many of these people, theoretically all of them, could be altruistic individuals who are perhaps paying money domestically or internationally through oxfam etc.

      There’s no need to admonish the call for greater funds to fight poverty. Of course there’s more to it than money! I think people involved in raising money to fight poverty are painfully aware of this fact. Also, there’s nothing wrong in comparing the GLOBAL cost of sanitation with US expenditure on cosmetics, dog food or alcohol. It’s a very simple measure illuminating global need with local, particular excesses by the rich.

    • Richard Fleming says:

      05:46pm | 25/11/09

      Thanks for the response Danielle.

      We at the Global Poverty Project totally agree with your call for a holistic approach. However, my article focused on our Government’s (and more importantly our community’s) greater responsibility for the 1.4 billion people living in extreme poverty (and subsequently dying from preventable diseases) not, as you suggest, on base economics.

      The figures you mentioned I merely used as a point of comparison for the current priorities within our community. Whilst money (in particular Official Development Assistance from OECD nations) is important, within the Global Poverty Project and our presentation ‘1.4 billion reasons’ we ensure that it is not defined as the single solution to ending extreme poverty.

      Rather we recognise that poverty is a complex and multifaceted issue and we focus on educating and engaging the Australian community on key aspects that can have the greatest impact within developing communities. These key aspects include:
      - Improving the quantity of aid provided by Australia and other developed countries
      - Increasing the quality of the aid that is provided to developing communities
      - Working towards fair and balanced trade relations internationally
      - Increasing the consumption of ethically produced and equitably traded goods and services
      - Meeting the Millennium Development Goals, with a particular focus on those goals that will not be met in 2015

      Our focus is also to increase the debate and discussion around these issues within Australia. I welcome and encourage people like you who comment and constructively disagree with us.

      Keep up the great work Danielle.

      @ Eric - Danielle is one of the kindest and most giving people you could imagine and has no reason to hate men. The reason the industry focuses on empowering women and children in developing communities as it is because they bare the brunt of all of the poverty issues… and they are key players in the solutions to end extreme poverty.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Lucy Kippist

'We are not here to sell fashion' - adore this post on clothes and nostalgia by @MaggieAhttp://t.co/nSlWkfv2o5

Daniel Piotrowski

Found a TV meteorologist on Twitter with the last name Piotrowski. There's a whole newsroom of Piotrowskis out there

Paul Colgan

RT @businessinsider: Man Being Questioned For Boston Bombing Connection Shot And Killed By FBI by @paulszoldrahttp://t.co/OtypP2PRgI

Daniel Piotrowski

This is a must read @TheAtlantic. Whether you think you know everything or think you know nothing http://t.co/naoUutCoWF

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter