You’ve got to hand it to Michael Clarke. His reinvention is complete. He is now Michael Clarke 4.0. He wins, the haters lose.

Shane Warne attended the wedding. So did a horse.

Let’s go back to 2004. The first version of Michael Clarke is the young, likeable kid with blond tips and ugly reflective sunnies who makes a Test century for Australia on debut in India, then later snares 6-9 in the same series. Six for Nine! Not even Warney ever boasted figures like that.

And if you think the young Pup can do mean things with a cricket ball, you should see him bowl the ladies over. They love him! Australia loves him! Everybody loves him! And then they hate him.

Look at the horse. Then his hair. Now look at the horse again. Now look at his hair…

The national hate affair unfolds as the scent of metrosexual wafts through the Australian dressing room and out onto the terraces where men wear Rexona and don’t exfoliate. In fact they can’t spell exfoliate. In fact, they don’t know there is a thing called exfoliation.

As Clarke’s popularity wanes, so does his batting. By late 2005 his average dips into the mid 30s and he is excused from Australian duties for the summer. He is back wearing the baggy green by mid 2006, which is about the time he meets Lara Bingle. Uh-oh.

I love you, I want you, I kneeeed you

Pup n Lara move into a swish Bondi pad and do loads of stupid ads for products with names like “Synergy” which no one ever buys because no one knows what purpose they actually serve – much like the Test selectors.

The Bingle Clarke pad overlooks Bondi Beach. Bearded photographers camp outside it, each of them as odious as the backpackers on the streets below. Michael and Lara are Australia’s Posh and Becks, and give every indication they love being positioned as exactly that. They don’t, however, necessarily appreciate the constant invasions of privacy.

This exterior shot of the Clarke/Bingle apartment never made the real estate brochure. Pic: John Grainger

Somewhere in this period comes the ill-advised Bonds undies ad in which Clarkey catches a tennis ball in his jocks. Also around this time, the happy couple announce that they are to be married. Then they announce they’re not. Whatever.

And that's the last time we embed an image of a woman's mag in a Punch sports story. Promise.

Meanwhile, Clarke is batting well again. He is Australia’s standout batsman in the futile 2009 Ashes campaign, and cricket fans almost start to like him again. Almost. And then comes the Lara nudey pic scandal. It has everything. A greedy agent, a dodgy footy player, nudity. Everything.

The next thing you know, the romance is on the rocks. Clarkey flies home from his tour in New Zealand and calls the whole thing off. He immediately knocks a brilliant century to celebrate.

Turned out to be a mercy dash

Let’s speed this thing up. Clarke ditches the Bondi pad, moves to The Shire and holds a press conference to announce he will be keeping a lower profile. Does Australia love him? Nope, not yet.

It takes Ricky Ponting to open the floodgates of adoration. The minute he forcedly hands over the captaincy reigns, Clarke shows intuition and flair, nous and bravado. It’s like having Mark Taylor and Steve Waugh in one body. Australia even starts winning games again.

This pic was taken in 2004. Who'd a thunk Clarke would prove a better skipper than the other bloke? Pic: Stephen Cooper

Do we love him? Starting to, but we still need a final reason to declare our allegiance. Even though it is now eight years after Clarke first came onto the international cricketing scene, and much of macho Australia has taken on exfoliation as part of its daily ritual, the deal is not yet sealed.

January 4th, 2012, dawns sunny and still. Or maybe it dawns grey and drizzly. Can’t really remember, as I pretty much just put that in for effect. Anyway, by the end of that day, Michael Clarke will be a monumental 251 not out.

He could bat most of the next day and still have time enough to bowl out India and win the game. In so doing, he could break Brian Lara’s record and plenty more. So what does he do? He declares on 329 not out. It is the ultimate selfless act. Actually, in all likelihood it is the ultimate act calculated to make Australia believe he is selfless, which he actually is, for the record.

He falls short of Bradman. Get it? Pic: Brett Costello

See, that’s the thing with Clarke. He has gotten in such a PR knot with the Australian public, he has had to deliberately unspin a lot of that. This he has done with great skill, and the Michael Clarke you see today is actually pretty close to the way the guy always was. Seriously, he’s actually pretty down-to-earth. He’s as embarrassed about some of his indulgences as we were.

Oh, I almost forgot the last chapter. He then marries Kyly Boldy with not a single women’s mag in sight. And lives happily ever after. Or does he…?

Sharwood 4.0. Follow him on Twitter @antsharwood

Most commented

57 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Little Joe says:

      06:39am | 18/05/12

      What?!?!? You didn’t think the lone wedding typifies why most people think .... that he is above the team.

      His batting form prior to the end of the NZ Tour was substandard ..... actually worse than Ponting’s form. Sensational Indian 2011-12 Tour ..... but slipped again in the West Indies Tour averaging just 31 ..... and it would have only been 23 if not for his 73 runs in the first innings of the first test.

      I will always wonder the reason for the decision to retire at 9/406 in the first innings of the first test .... still 43 runs behind the West Indies. Harris (68no) and Lyon (40no) had shared a partnership of almost 100runs.

      Why wouldn’t you keep them out there ....
      1) knock off a few more runs from the West Indies lead,
      2) possibly keep the West Indies out there for another hour,
      3) let Lyon and Harris get their century partnership,
      4) maybe Lyon could have got his maiden first class half century.

      All morale building factors for Australia and morale eroding factors for the West Indies.

      Why wouldn’t you keep them out there ....
      1) Clarke could be top scorer for the innings.

    • Macca says:

      07:17am | 18/05/12

      I think he average of 31 in the West Indies was about as good as anyone in that series.

      And they won that game on the final day, he was running out of time do he made a big call.

      There’s no point with people like you, is there, Joe?

    • Nathan says:

      07:19am | 18/05/12

      Little Joe
      They won the game did they not? How can you say it was a bad decision when they had time to consider. If anything it shows belief in the bowling unit that they will get the job done. No point batting for the sake of batting and chewing up overs.

      It was a gutsy decision and proved to be the correct one. If he was all about ego he would of kept batting against India to break records

    • gobsmack says:

      08:10am | 18/05/12

      Last summer there were two occasions when an Australian batsman made a century in trying and difficult conditions.  First was Warner’s century in Hobart which, but for the lack of any support, could have stolen the game.  Second was Warner’s match winning century in Perth.
      The Melbourne Test was won thanks largely to Ponting’s pair of 50s.
      Then there were the flat tracks in Sydney and Adelaide where everyone made runs.

    • acotrel says:

      08:27am | 18/05/12

      Is he related to Arthur C. Clarke ?

    • K says:

      09:01am | 18/05/12

      Little Joe - I’m gonna guess you don’t know a lot about the strategic side of cricket.

      Clarke sent the windies out there in fading light with an hour to go. Windies try to block there way to stumps but instead end up losing 3 top order wickets. Clarke took a gamble and it came off.

    • Little Joe says:

      09:13am | 18/05/12

      @ Macca

      Oh please ..... running out of time??? It was the first innings!!!

      Clarke had a chance to show how good he was in the second innings when chasing less than 200 .... came in at 4-131…left 9-runs later on 6. The game was left to be won by the tail-enders. Reminded me of other recent performances

      Aust vs SA - Second Test Match, Second Innings

      Chasing just over 300, Clarke comes in at 3-141…left 4-runs later on 2. Haddin, Johnson and Cummins saved the Test Match.

      Aust vs NZ - Second Test Match, Second Innings

      Chasing just over 200, Clarke comes in at 3-159…left 13 balls later with a duck. Australia lose the Test Match.

      I just find it appauling that Clarke is considered a “better captain” than Waugh by Ant .... and has been recently out-captained in Test Match Series and ODI’s.

    • Little Joe says:

      10:08am | 18/05/12

      @ K

      What was that garbage that you posted?!?!?

      Now I know that some of what I write can upset some people, and that my interpretation of Clarke’s life, lifestyle and captaincy may displease people who think that Clarke is “God’s gift to Cricket” ..... but I don’t write the absolute crap (ICB).

      Clarke called the innings between Lunch and Tea on the 4th day of the Test Match. Lots of light, great batting conditions and after both teams scored 400+ with Australia’s No.9 and No.11 were batting without fear.

      There is no way the declaration was to get a result because, due to his effort with the bat, Harris couldn’t even open the bowling!!!

      It was a brilliant and, I would say, unexpected bowling spell by Hilfenhaus that turned the game. It was 3/4 off less than five overs before Harris claimed the huge wicket of Chanderpaul.

      There was only one strategy behind the declaration ...... and it wasn’t about winning the game.
      There was only one reason

    • nathan says:

      11:13am | 18/05/12

      Little Joe
      Correction mate you do talk crap, critical even when the experts applauded. You don’t like the guy and that is clouding your judgment

    • Little Joe says:

      11:39am | 18/05/12

      @ Nathan,

      He tripped over a win with a shallow decision.

      All that I have posted are facts or my opinion based on the facts. If you want to shoot me down do it with facts ..... not BS like K’s little attempt!!!

      You like the guy and that’s what is clouding your judgement.

    • jarrod says:

      01:51pm | 18/05/12

      Joe, do you even read what you post? You said yourself it was half way through day 4 and still in the first innings. You then persist in claiming that he wasn’t running short on time to close out the match?!

      Even ignoring that play was called early on the first 3 days for bad light that’s a ridiculous claim.

    • Little Joe says:

      04:47pm | 18/05/12

      @ Jarrod

      Are you reading what I have written??

      There was no reason to think that Clarke’s decision was about winning the Test Match.

      1) Over three and a half days only sixteen wickets had fallen.
      2) It was still a good batting wicket.
      3) In the First Innings the Australian Bowler with the best figures was Warner (2/45). Australia’s strike bowlers collected only 4-wickets.
      4) Harris could not open the bowling because he had been batting for more than 3 hours.
      5) If he was thinking about time .... and this is a big one .... he would have declared at drinks, NOT THE OVER AFTER DRINKS!!!

      He wasn’t thinking about winning the game!!!

      Quote :
      “Looks like the declaration by Clarke was just in time to make sure his score was the highest of the innings!”

      (http://www.espncricinfo.com/west-indies-v-australia-2012/engine/match/540176.html?innings=3;page=1;view=commentary)

      Hilfenhaus took 3 wicket in 14 balls that was the difference.

      And then it could have ended so so badly!!! Chasing 192 :

      - Cowan : dropped on 6 when Australia was 1/32
      - Watson : dropped on 4 when Australia was 1/36. Watson went on to score a half century.

      There was no way Clarke was thinking about winning the Test Match when he declared, and he got very lucky. The Australian Team (not Clarke) plucked a victory out nowhere ..... but it was almost a game that was lost from nowhere also.

    • Nathan says:

      02:58am | 19/05/12

      @Little Joe
      You are wrong simple as that, the game needed to be moved along. What are you going to do bat and force a draw. The game went from what was a certain draw to one that most likely only Australia could but still force a draw if need be.

      He played the odds and came up trumps. I have never been a clarke fan until he has become captain and he is a brilliant captain.

      You continue to ignore the fact that if he played for his own record why did he declare in Sydney?

    • Little Joe says:

      08:43am | 19/05/12

      @ Nathan

      I put together an argument listing facts pertaining to the game and your response is “You are wrong simple as that”. I am sorry but my 14YO son could do better

      If “the game needed to be moved along” as you state, why didn’t Clarke move it along at the drinks break!!! It stands out like “dogs balls” that if he was thinking about forcing a win he would have declared at drinks.

      The most likely result was still a draw. Other than that I would have put a higher probability on an Australian Loss. Why would he think that he could win?? West Indies were still over 40-runs in front. The most likely event was they would have scored 200 runs leaving an unattainable 240+ run chase on a deteriorating pitch that would have been a minefield for a run chase in deteriorating light on the 5th Day.  As stated, two dropped catches early in the innings would have seen an Australian loss.

      As for “a brilliant captain”, as I have shown, he has been given three opportunities to be a brilliant Captain in the past 12-mths and lead the Australian Team to success in difficult run chases. FAIL, FAIL, FAIL!!! Maybe next time he will show some backbone and tenacity.

      He is a show pony. His declaration was simply a reiteration of what Mark Taylor did a few years back.

    • Dave-o says:

      06:47am | 18/05/12

      If he loses the Ashes, we’ll burn him at the stake. Metaphorically….possibly.

    • Tator says:

      08:09am | 18/05/12

      shouldn’t that read burn him at the stumps

    • Eskimo says:

      09:19am | 18/05/12

      The Ashes aren’t Australia’s to lose.

    • Macca says:

      07:14am | 18/05/12

      I’ve always been a fan of Pup and have asserted his detractors have been far too critical of a young bloke who has too many people around him telling him what to do.

      His captaincy has been more than a breath of fresh air in Australian cricket and the most recent (extended) summer has been one I’ve enjoyed considerably compared to recent years.

      Let’s hope it continues, the bloke can do little wrong right now

    • TChong says:

      08:18am | 18/05/12

      agree Macca.
      We all do dumb things,  ( the Bingle side show, etc) , and mostly, move on.
      Pups outstanding results show he has more than met the expectations of the cricket loving population.
      Long may he reign.

    • TJ says:

      09:22am | 18/05/12

      What is it with everyone calling him “Pup” like he’s your best mate or something?

      It’s so sad and embarrassing.

    • Claire says:

      10:39am | 18/05/12

      @TJ

      Pup is his nickname. Like Ponting is Punter. Like M.Hussey is Mr Cricket. Everyone calls him that.

    • TJ says:

      12:10pm | 18/05/12

      @ Claire

      LOL I’m well aware that’s his nickname, I’m not a fool.

      I don’t have an issue with his friends, teamates and people who actually know him calling him Pup. I just think it’s sad a bunch of strangers call him Pup like they are all buddy bubby with him.

    • stephen says:

      07:32am | 18/05/12

      Nice piece, and his latest wedding photos show a man at the top of the pile.
      Good luck to him, and we do indeed wait for The Ashes.

    • Tim says:

      07:52am | 18/05/12

      That declaration was not a selfless act.
      He had plenty of time and choose the option that was the least likely to produce a bad result for M. Clarke.
      If he bats on and they draw everyone would be calling for his head.
      If he declares early and they still draw the criticism wouldn’t be anywhere near as harsh.

    • Rev says:

      08:45am | 18/05/12

      Maybe, but the difference is that Ponting would have batted on, damn the result.

    • gobsmack says:

      07:53am | 18/05/12

      Couldn’t she have ridden side-saddle?
      Really tacky.
      It looks like they were inspired by an episode of Kath and Kim.

    • TChong says:

      09:21am | 18/05/12

      i thought it was more Bollywood than K + K

    • Tim says:

      09:26am | 18/05/12

      Why do you care about his wedding photos is the more pertinent question?
      Are you a closet no idea subscriber?

    • gobsmack says:

      09:49am | 18/05/12

      @Tim
      Why do you care that I care about the wedding photos?
      I came out as a no-idea subscriber a long time ago.  I suggest you do the same.

    • Tim says:

      10:53am | 18/05/12

      Gobsmack,
      I buy Woman’s Monthly instead, it’s a great periodical.

    • Tubesteak says:

      08:00am | 18/05/12

      Didn’t this fool learn his lesson last time he went out with some high maintenance princess. How he expects to keep a marriage going to a woman that expects the fairytale everything when he’s away 9 months of the year is beyond me. He should have had a long chat with Bing about how that works out. Then pick up the hot 20 year old when he retires from the sport still with a few million $ endorsements. He’ll still have the money and fame that chicks love but he won’t have to be on tour all the time

    • Gregg says:

      08:09am | 18/05/12

      Good luck to the Pup and Kyly for he has certainly been through a few wringers to get where he is now.
      It’s hard to say whether he’ll be a better captain than Steve for the ACB tapped him on the shoulder rather prematurely as far as I was concerned.
      Steve and Taylor both had great sides to captain, still a great side when Ricky took over and one of the faults of Australian cricket is that teams have been allowed to get to a stage where you just have too many older players all at the same time and there ought to be a bit more planning for continual introduction of new blood as has been seen in the last year or so.

      I go back to Alan Border to see one of our great captains, a guy who could do it all, a bit like Pup and Steve and who also had to carry a young side along a bit and see growth into the strength it was for well over a decade following his retirement.
      The Pup is going to have a similar role and hopefully he’ll have great success too though there’s still a couple more yet to be tapped.

      It ought to be goodbye Ricky and Mr. Cricket, you’ve served your country well but It’s Time fellas.

    • Kika says:

      08:27am | 18/05/12

      What sort of parents would subject their child to spelling their already boganified name Kylie into Ky-ly. Is it Ky-LAI? (Sounds like lie). Really? KY-LAI. Haha. Gosh parents can be cruel.

      Oh CRAP i have porrdige on my scarf.

      Sorry Ky-LAI.

      When I have kids I will call mine ANFERNEE JIMINY CRICKETS.

    • TJ says:

      09:50am | 18/05/12

      You know what’s even more bogan than that name?

      Posing on a white horse in a foul dress.

      What’s the bet they have a tiger skin rug in their lounge room?

    • Gregg says:

      10:00am | 18/05/12

      How’s about Ky lee and it’s porridge!
      That’‘d make a good name - Porridge, Pudding for a tomboy and Dumpling for a sweetie.

      You’re eating porridge with your scarf on!

    • Sarahh says:

      10:35am | 18/05/12

      Oh god, I thought I was the only one who noticed the elephant in the room being that awful spelling.  I kept double taking when I’d see the name, it’s really clunky to read.

    • Kika says:

      12:25pm | 18/05/12

      Yeah the porridge was in a cup - one of those instant ones and I must have dropped some onto my scarf. Don’t worry. I didn’t travel on the bus and walking through the city with a big lump of porridge on my scarf and I wasn’t eating out of a bowl and let it drape inside. hahaha.

      Yeah I know! It’s crazy. It is really clunky. Kyly. If the first syllable is pronounced KAI, but the last part is spelled the same, then it reads as KAI-LAI.  Maybe Michael should change the spelling of his name to MAIKEL. or MYKIL. Or MYKL.

    • Budz says:

      08:27am | 18/05/12

      You just can’t make everyone happy. All I know is that he is clearly a great captain as he has had lesser players to work with yet his results have been amazing.
      Also I have not heard of a single person that has met him say a bad word about him. I think the biggest issue is the clear generational gap between the old fans and him. He is the new breed and the old beer swilling fan can’t relate to him.

    • Josh says:

      08:39am | 18/05/12

      Ponting got better better after he married. Clarke has shown he has matured measurably in the last few years.

      His captaincy (especially) compared to Ponting’s is nothing short of a breath of fresh air. He has Steve’s aggressive gamble on the win mentality and Warn’es unorthodoxy.

      He has done really not done much wrong since being captain.  15 matches, 9 wins. He averages 56 with that bat and has 8 wickets.

    • Josh says:

      08:50am | 18/05/12

      AB is underrated and almost forgotten by some. Australia’s surge to the top was started by AB.

      Don’t forget his name kids.

    • Cynic says:

      12:05pm | 18/05/12

      Yeah but pity he’s an arse of a human being in person.

    • Little Joe says:

      01:50pm | 18/05/12

      That’s why the best Australian Cricketer over the past 12-months doesn’t get the Bob Simpson Medal or the Shane Warne Medal or the Greg Chappell Medal or Richie Benaud Medal or the Bill Woodfull Medal ....... he gets the Alan Border Medal

    • Nathan Explosion says:

      08:51am | 18/05/12

      Look, I don’t give a hit about sports, or sports stars.

      And at the risk of having to hand in my man card forever, that is the fugliest, trashiest wedding dress I have ever seen. She look like one of the chicks on My Big Fat Gypsy Wedding.

    • miloinacup says:

      09:40am | 18/05/12

      MBFGW is a brilliant show! It’s so tacky & delicious - I love it.

      But I agree. For some reason, my boyfriend said it was nice. I side-eyed the hell out of him for that comment.

    • Tubesteak says:

      12:00pm | 18/05/12

      You don’t like sport
      You give a rat’s toss about wedding dresses and how they look
      You actually know something about some fat gypsy show

      That’s three strikes. Yep, hand in your man card now. There is no redemption.

      I bet you don’t like beer either and you thank your wife for having sex with you on the rare occasion she does.

    • Anna C says:

      09:03am | 18/05/12

      I’m not a fan of the man but good on him for not selling out his wedding to the women’s magazines for a shit load of cash. 

      I bet Lara’s fuming about the one that got away.  Don’t like her at all.  She’s a pretty girl but what exactly does she do again? 

      Good luck to Michael and his new wife.

    • Kika says:

      09:53am | 18/05/12

      I debate the point about Lara Bingle being pretty. She’s attractive if she doesn’t open that god damn toad mouth of hers. I’ve seen prettier smiles on a Cane Toad!

    • Gregg says:

      10:03am | 18/05/12

      Especially when they’ve got away Kika.

    • NicoleG says:

      10:10am | 18/05/12

      LOL Kika, that was bluddy funny. Haha

    • Wayne Kerr says:

      01:14pm | 18/05/12

      personally I don’t see what the big fuss about Lara Bingle is.  She had a good bod in the where the bloody hell are you ad but I can’t say that her face is anything special or could be considerd pretty.

    • stephen says:

      07:36pm | 18/05/12

      And she’s certainly very pretty ... and not a bad rhymer, too.

    • Kebabpete says:

      09:30am | 18/05/12

      The reason people hate him is not because of what he does but because he comes across as media trained.

      He may as well be a politician because every answer to every question is so calculated that there is not a shred of honesty about him.

      People would forgive his misgivings if he seemed genuine.

    • Rosie says:

      09:46am | 18/05/12

      We are getting enough razza matazz from Warnie & Liz! Thank goodness Clarke kept his wedding low key and both individuals for respecting it, more so for his wife, the not famous one. She had the right idea, all the publicity would have been because Clarke was famous. Great respect for his wife!

      All the very best for their future as a married couple.

    • Tell It Like It Is says:

      10:11am | 18/05/12

      It is hard to imagine any subject less interesting than the personal life of M Clarke, his wedding and certainly Lara Bingle. Except perhaps media coverage of Kyle. Talk about self-perpetuating nonsense.

    • Wilma J Craig says:

      10:27am | 18/05/12

      Dress looked like the skirt was made up of 10s or 1000s of Kleenex sewn together. What a shocker! Probably cost the equivalent of some small country’s entire annual income.
      He looked nice.

    • TheOzTrucker says:

      12:18pm | 18/05/12

      It’s not just Clarke. It’s all cricketers. They make me sick.
      The selectors seem to pick players regardless of form.
      The whole lot of them are arrogant and seem to have that sense of entitlement you find in the youth of today.
      They have no respect for history and the traditions of the game.
      I feel certain the likes of Bradman would be appalled by some of the press surrounding some the players.
      I have no doubt that cricket is not the game it once was.
      I truely wonder what Richie really thinks.

    • P says:

      03:50pm | 18/05/12

      “The minute he forcedly hands over the captaincy reigns…”

      You may ‘reign’ as captain, but you hand over ‘reins’.

      Love the article though.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter