A little known fact I like to trot out at feminist rallies and family gatherings is that I use to work for the esteemed gentlemen’s periodical, Zoo Weekly magazine. Officially my title was Online Editor, but unofficially it was You Tube surfer and talker to the hottest chicks planet earth has ever produced.

The author has been dogged by rumours since leaving the above place of employment.

Sadly my tenure at the Encyclopaedia Tit-tanica was brief, and a decision that to the male ego sounds like the frothy rantings of a mad man. In bloke-speak the phrase “I quit a job at Zoo Weekly” roughly translates to “I’m a frightful shirtlifter, pass the amyl and pump up the Right Said Fred”.

But after I’ve stopped trying to use my penis for a brain, not only is the fleshy mirage of life at a lad’s mag revealed, but so too are a few finer points of the deluded male mind.

You see, the thing about blokes is, we like looking at chicks. Like, a lot. At any given moment, at any given opportunity, our peepers are ferreting the landscape for body parts. Bums, boobs, legs, faces, it actually doesn’t matter. As long as they’re attached to women, preferably alive, preferably not related to us, we really don’t care.

As sensitive a new age guy I tell myself I am, oh isn’t the plight of the Tibetan people just ghastly, I’d be both a liar and a fool to pretend I’m not chock to the brain brim with naughty thoughts, and am just as sex obsessed as the next guy. And that guy is proper disgusting.

One would think the perfect remedy to such addictions would be a nine to five knee deep in the babes. For me it was my own personal Gitmo. Or if it pleases the court, Titmo.

Call me crazy, a maverick if you will, but I don’t see what’s so great about being forced to look at hot women all day, when none of them are even remotely interested in letting you touch their boobs.

Trotting up to Zoo every day was like a vagrant being forced to sit at Tetsuya’s for eight hours straight reading nothing but cookbooks. And while working at a lad’s mag is one thing, buying one is something else. Most blokes either love it, or are too entranced by the saucy smoke and mirrors to even notice they’re being had.

So if magazines are supposed to be aspirational, what exactly are blokes aspiring to? What do we think is going to happen by constantly sifting through these preposterous pleasure pamphlets?

Do we really think that by some weird science the busty Vodka Cruiser-loving Parra Eels-supporting Nickelback fan and personal assistant from Wetherill Park is going to spring from the centrefold shouting “take me to bed or lose me forever”.

Somehow, in the distant galaxy we call “our brains”, we kind of do.

It’s perhaps a little known fact that every time a man meets a member of the opposite number we run a scenario through our heads called: “What are the chances that this woman will actually let me have sex with her?”

Over the years we’ve developed a simple yet watertight system of checks and balances to help answer this question with pinpoint accuracy, of which I will reveal to you now:

Am I married?
Is she married?
Has she actually said the words “I do not want to have sex with you”?

If the answer to all three questions is no, the woman is then placed in the “Maybe” file and any even remotely flirtatious behaviour will result in us doing whatever you damn want, any damn time you want it.

All others are placed in the second file known as the “Mates” file, and will be asked to take a number. There are only two files.

It is the job of the magazine to trick the male reader into placing every single woman twixt their pages into the former. This is ingeniously done by omitting any details of steady relationships, and by having the woman look directly at the lens of the camera. Lens gazing is crucial. To the malleable male mind any woman looking into the camera is interpreted as eye contact and thus the “Maybe” file is activated.

It doesn’t even matter how famous, far away or out of our league. Until you can tell me for sure that Megan Fox will never need go to the RTA at Marrickville Metro, stop by the Boost Juice counter while I’m getting a large banana buzz and say, “Excuse me, do you know where Kmart is oh and can you please touch my boobs?” Until you can completely and scientifically rule that possibility out, SHE STAYS IN THE FILE. End of story.

But of course, to anyone without a knob for a brain, this is all a ridiculous pile of tosh. An illusion of such complex idiocy that it makes the seasoned World Of Warcraft level eleven dungeon master whose skin hasn’t seen the light of day in over ten years seem far more in touch with reality.

Forget the lad’s mags, mag lads. They’re a con.

Stop drinking the Kool-Aid. Unplug from the Matrix. Put down the pages, take a deep breath and drink in the amazing, beautiful woman sitting next to you. You’ll know her because she’ll be the one laughing at all your bad jokes, not bringing up your expanding girth, and hasn’t been manufactured by Adobe Photoshop.

Give her a kiss, tell her that you love her, and maybe, just maybe, she’ll let you touch her boobs.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

44 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Ally says:

      03:57pm | 19/01/10

      So it turns out Megan Fox is engaged again… Does that put her in the “other” file now?!? heh.

    • Ms A says:

      12:53pm | 13/01/10

      Good luck Country Mum. I hope you find the happiness that you deserve.

    • kaz says:

      11:04am | 13/01/10

      Chris, you really have written a piece to remember here. Thankyou for sharing your thoughts!

    • Country Mum of teenage girls says:

      01:14pm | 17/11/09

      @Lisa

      yep…air brushing…heh…someone do me smile...I mean air brush LMAO

    • Lisa says:

      09:00am | 17/11/09

      Can we talk about airbrushing now…please?

    • Lisa says:

      08:59am | 17/11/09

      DG, I feel upset for you. How could she put you in that position? It’s not at all reasonable. Do you have children?
      Heavy conversation for an article was basically great humour…

    • Jessica says:

      08:19am | 17/11/09

      To Country Mum,
      I know how you feel! I am only 24 years old, totally fit, I spend 5-6 days a week at the gym, have spent some time modelling and my boyfriend does honestly prefer to watch porn than have sex with me 9 days out of ten. This occurred because we worked different hours - I worked nights, and he worked days, so his nights were filled watching porn, and now it has become an addiction. And I LOVE sex, but being rejected for porn is incredibly hurtful and it is really really hard to initiate sex, when I know that I might be rejected, or he might be ‘too tired’ becuase he has already jerked off that day. I still love him & we have a happy relationship, the only probelm we have is the porn problem.

      All I am saying is that to those who might say ‘get on the treadmill’ - you don’t know what you’re talking about. Addiction to porn does not discriminate. I am a victim, my boyfriend is a victim. There are no winners here - and this is not an extreme case, and have a friends who have experienced the same thing.

    • Lisa says:

      01:44am | 17/11/09

      Country Mum I feel bad for you.
      I have had my own brush with porn, and it did affect me emotionally… although my husband had nothing to do with viewing it, really.
      Very shortly after the birth of my second child, and still recovering from the birth, several friend of my husband’s started sending my husband video porn on the home computer.
      My husband opened only a little of it after work but being at home with the children, I began to feel besieged.
      These pornographic messages continued for more than a year. I became a bit obsessed, and some of them, I opened. Some involved quite young looking girls, and there was quite a bit of violence. There were also accompanying comical messages written by the guys, along with each video.
      I wrote emails to each of these (older, family) men, begging them to stop sending the messages, but they just kept coming. it caused a terrible rift with my husband. He told my family I had post-natal depression!
      I had to block them in the end. I felt terribly bullied, and even socially humiliated as these friends of my husband wrote nasty, humorous messages at my expense on their sporting blogs in response to my asking them to cease. They also urged my husband to get a private email address, so he could receive the messages there. Thankfully, he did not do this.

    • tlc says:

      12:30am | 17/11/09

      Chris, I agree with you .
      You are crazy!

    • Shama says:

      07:17pm | 16/11/09

      DG appreciate your thoughtful and honest post.

      Country Mum of teenage girls here’s to things getting better.

    • Country Mum of teenage girls says:

      05:55pm | 16/11/09

      I am sorry DG.
      My anger should not have been aimed at you in any regard.Thank you for being a better prson than me and not snarling back..The frustration and hurt makes one easily turn on others like a bear with a head ache.
      My favorite saying has always been “shit happens”
      But hey, even the shit tends to stick after time and one becomes to down to wash it off.
      May karma bring both of us what ever it is we are entitled to, preferably something better than we have.

    • Tereen Hough says:

      05:00pm | 16/11/09

      You know, women have that filing system, too.  Usually it’s either a) possible relationship material and might be a ‘keeper’ for a while or b) great to F4 but not appropriate for a ‘real’ relationship….probably just a F4 buddy.
      As you get older, you often eliminate category a altogether and b becomes - not even F4able.

      I think it a major male developmental watershed moment when they realize that sex is 99% in the brain and that intelligence is the greatest turn-on of all.

    • DG says:

      04:47pm | 16/11/09

      Country Mum of teenage girls says:

      I apologise if you took that as a defence of his behaviour or an attack on your own. It was intended to be neither. It was intended to be an empathetic appreciation of the complexities involved of an issue that seemed to have been carrying on for 6 years - I’m sorry that it appears to have caused you some distress.

      At no stage did I suggest your appearance was the issue in question, I’m not sure where you got that, but I am sure this is an emotional time so I shall refrain from drawing too much from that and your ongoing diatribe about the evils of pornography.

      As I said, if he doesn’t take up your offer he’s an idiot. So, clearly, he is an idiot. He had affection at home and choose to go elsewhere instead. Now I’m not sure how you blame pornography for that? How about blaming him, how about making him accountable for his decisions?

      Maybe I am naïve,  but I couldn’t imagine that a guy would rather look it up that do it in the real world with a person that actually wanted to be with him. It just doesn’t make any sense whatsoever. Given half a chance I would be with my wife but, weeks after we were married and for no apparent reason, she decided she “isn’t in love” and for years intimacy has been a thing of dreams (I should point out that the idea of porn doesn’t particularly appeal to me at all, if I wanted that I wouldn’t bother with a partner), but to think that someone could prefer a website to their partner is just beyond comprehension (outside of mental illness) - now if their partner wasn’t willing, or they didn’t have a partner I can perhaps understand the appeal. 

      It’s hard feeling so unappreciated, unwanted, unworthy and the feeling of ongoing rejection, It’s how I live every day. I thought that my words could provide some empathy in a topic that I anticipated to be filled with posts on the joys of sex. I apologise that my attempt at empathy was misplaced. Maybe I foolishly assumed the best in people - that he was trying to do the right thing as much as you were, and that some how this had headed down some slippery slope despite the best efforts of both. I should point out that I blamed him - firstly for the wandering eye and secondly because he didn’t feel like changing his behaviour (and hence drove you to feeling that there was no hope). Good luck. I hope you have more luck that I do.

    • Budz says:

      04:28pm | 16/11/09

      Zeta, if you wanted something quality to read why don’t you buy The Economist, The AFR, Think Big or even Men’s Health. They all have some quality stuff in them.

    • Anthony and Justine says:

      03:26pm | 16/11/09

      Kate has a point - women indulge in exactly the same fantasizing over unattainable men. It’s not a man thing or a woman thing, it’s just part of the natural human condition.

    • Sam says:

      03:25pm | 16/11/09

      Rather than offer my 2 cents on whether this was a good article or not… rather than consider the accuracy of generalisations made and whether every man’s brain is being put under the microscope or whether it’s just the ones that buy FHM ... and rather than go into detail to explain how the mere existence of porn on such an accessible platform, such as the Internet, has corrupted so many minds (btw. it’s not irreversable in my view)... I will instead try to be brief (already failed that) and eloquent (who am I kidding)...

      are you ready for it….. here it comes….. “DEMOCRACY IS CHAOS”. Thank You, thank you, thank you. Please come again.

    • Kate says:

      03:18pm | 16/11/09

      Well written Chris- great article

    • Country Mum of teenage girls says:

      03:13pm | 16/11/09

      @Michael :in regards to saying I need to get on the tredmill.
      What a narrow minded, shallow, self opinionated, sexist pig you are.
      Men like you are the reason for the sales of vibrators and the growth of gay weddings.
      My man is obese and does not care.
      I am not.
      He is 49.
      I am 7 years younger and not overweight
      He looks at teenage porn and sex movies that he pays for on the internet and his phone and at work.
      I would only ever get on “the treadmill” for ME. Weight loss for any other reasoning is a lost cause.
      Like he is worth the sweat anyway.lol. 
      As far as the sex goes….I enjoyed the sex and it was always on tap for him right up till recently.
      You should note that
      a) I did not, at any stage ask for comments.
      b) you are a fool who I would assume has not passed the wanking stage or paying for it stage.There for your reply is of no value.
      @DG.
      you guessed WRONG.
      He was getting plenty up till last month for the past 6 years.Yet I have asked that the 24/7 perving to stop 6 years ago and ever since.Which includes profiles of single and cheating married women in our state of victoria.
      I have always had a trim figure and he would be hard put to get more than scorn, were he to try chatting up anything female under 50 without a guide dog or brain damage.
      Did it ever enter your narrow sex driven little brain down stairs, that maybe ...JUST MAYBE…I am being honest and have tried for 6 years to forgive the man I love and cope with the teenage eye candy until breaking point ??????
      The breaking point being scorn aimed at him and men in general and eventual lack of self worth thanks to his daily intake of brain dead, drug adicted teen sluts having sex-romps, doing anything and everything for 5 seconds of slime ridden fame in private lounge rooms all over the world…..*available at any given time on your mobile or internet* - *sarcastic smirk*
      Dirty little tarts need a good slap around the back of their head and a pair of knickers put back over their privates.
      I doubt there is a male with working eye balls over the age of 12 worth the effort and respect that you all think is your due.
      *frowns at self for making an effort to correct the lower end of the gene pool with common sense and happily decides not to bother with any second effort *

    • Shama says:

      02:58pm | 16/11/09

      G - Based on general consumption patterns it would appear that men like a) porn and 2) violence/action. I think it was quite clear that I was referring to them separately though I am sure the two overlap from time to time.

      Zoo exists because it sells.  So regardless of whether you and I don’t read it and don’t know people who read it, there is an LCD out there.

    • James Price says:

      01:40pm | 16/11/09

      The truth hurts; these “hot chicks” had me with the eye contact.

    • G says:

      01:25pm | 16/11/09

      @ Ahh what, 55%
      Hey, what’s happening in that first paragraph?
      I simply disagree with the writer that most men read these types of magazines and that we are governed by their lowest common denominator.
      P.S. by the sounds of it you probably have a Lvl 80 DK or something equally bad.

      @ Scott
      I read the article again; it is clear directed at the majority of males in my demographic.  The language he uses clearly denotes most ‘men’ in general terms, he says ‘blokes’, ‘we’ and ‘we’ve’.

      “You see, the thing about blokes is, we like looking at chicks. Like, a lot.”
      “So if magazines are supposed to be aspirational, what exactly are blokes aspiring to?”
      “Somehow, in the distant galaxy we call “our brains”, we kind of do.”

      @ Shama
      Wrong, my statement was based on anecdotal evidence that is based on personal experience, so they are not sweeping generalisations.

      Actually talking about generalisations.  When you refer to most men liking hardcore porn and the ‘violent stuff’. 

      By violent stuff do you mean that most men like hardcore porn that is based on violence, or that men like hardcore porn and violenence separately, like in action movies for example? 

      Because I don’t know what kind of porn you’re talking about if you think that there is violence in porn.

    • Miss M says:

      01:25pm | 16/11/09

      hmm, i liked this article. thanks Chris

    • stephen says:

      01:18pm | 16/11/09

      This is the sort of topic that needs more pictures.

    • Eric says:

      12:58pm | 16/11/09

      Zeta, maybe it’s the man-hating attitudes of journalists that are driving men away from rags like the Bulletin and the SMH.

      In the meantime, the more intelligent of us have turned to the Internet. What man wants to read mags and papers that only spew misandry? (besides you, that is)

    • Paul says:

      12:53pm | 16/11/09

      Porn is everywhere, you cannot escape it. Yesterday I was behind a bus which was adorned with a huge advertisement of a woman in extremely skimpy shorts crouched down with her hand on her nether regions about to commit an act of extreme intimacy. What pisses me with the liberal countercultural elites who have pushed sexual “liberation” down our throats from the 60’s is that they conveniently forget the rights of those folk who desire to live porn free! The rights of those to access porn exceeds the rights of those who wish to be free of it ! You cannot have it both ways - one will pervade the world of the other.

      Many unfortunate victims of the sexually secular are those men such as the husband of “Country Girl”. They are sex addicts and have become so because of the easy access to pornography that the internet offers. Many millions of relationships have been destroyed because of the insidious nature of the industry. It distorts the basic sex urge and yes many addicted men would prefer to indulge their pornographic tastes than have physical relationships with their wives. I would suggest to him that he attend a sex addicts support group as the only direction open to him presently is a never ending spiral of self destruction. 

      But porn is only a tiny sympton of the general malaise that has befallen us. There is no longer any refreshing innocence to sexuality anymore! The womens mags vomit as much filth and perversity as the mens mags, marriage has just about been annihilated and feminism does everything within its power to stoke the embers of hatred between the sexes! 

      It is strange isn’t it that in this age of so called sexual “liberation” that people are having far less sex than they have ever had. That in fact the people that enjoy the most sex are those that are married! Single folk get the least. Bit of an oxymoron in todays “progressive” enlightened society!

    • Zeta says:

      12:42pm | 16/11/09

      Damn straight men are as dumb as you think, as evidenced by the fact Zoo, Ralph, FHM et al are weathering the magazine downturn that saw The Bulletin close its doors. Am I the only one who thinks that’s a cosmic injustice on a grand scale? That Zoo still comes out every week and The Bulletin is no more?

      I love breasts as much as the next red blooded male, but I also love incisive political and economic commentary. And besides which, these magazines are glorified lingerie catalouges! There is nothing in them you can’t get when the K-mart catalogue arrives at your door step.

      Within a few clicks, there are boobs a plenty on the internet. For free! That saves you money you could have been spending on The Bulletin!

      And while people pay out on Cleo, Dolly, Girlfriend, whatever their names are, at least the ones my girlfriend leaves around the house seem to have the occassional burst of half way decent long form journalism, albeit on topics I could care less about. I could write the next issue of Zoo in my lunch break. ‘THIS WEEK: Breasts, a retrospective. The latest in sub-woofers, another exclusive look inside the SAS we bought from a freelancer who read an Andy McNab book, PLUS reviews of the latest beer adverts, and vapid women who can’t spell their own ridiculous aspirational first names try on impractical underpants for your viewing pleasure.’ There, done, where’s my pay cheque?

      Every time I see a man (or more likely, a boy) reading one of these trashy lad mags on the train, I pray for the end to come. I pray that an enourmous tidal wave will wash over the eastern seaboard, I pray that whole carriages full of vacuous, polo shirt wearing scum will fall to the bottom of the ocean, and that in centuries to come, there will be nothing left of our decadent, ignorant culture except for a seabed of skulls still sporting bleached tips and ancient, turned up collars around which will swim tiny, irradecent mutant fish who’ll nibble on the pulped pages featuring Cowrtnay and Chanaya cavorting in four cylinder sports cars…

      Sorry, that was a bit dark for a Monday morning.

    • H of SA says:

      12:27pm | 16/11/09

      The term “lad’s magazine” says it all. These are no magazines for men, they are magazines for people who don’t want to grow up yet.

    • michael says:

      12:26pm | 16/11/09

      LOL country mum needs to hop on the treadmill. look good for your husband and erase the need for him to seek alternatives.

    • Shama says:

      11:21am | 16/11/09

      G@10.33 is all annoyed at sweeping generalisations and then goes on to suggest that women he knows read trash mags. I am not sure what his point is - that women in his demographic read trash mags? In fact most women I work with read serious mags and if they read anything light it is one of those home reno/cooking mags.  So it takes all kinds. But I do agree that purely by circulation numbers, it must be Zoo and New Idea that are tops.

      It’s true that plenty of women read escapist stuff and are addicted to romance and fashion and the like. But somehow it seems a lot more benign than hardcore porn and the violent stuff that men seem to want. The ideal of most romance stuff is the stable, happy marriage and family -seems far more constructive than a lifelong excapism into naked 18 year olds and shoot em ups.

    • DG says:

      11:02am | 16/11/09

      @Sydney girl (11:39am | 16/11/09)

      I do not know one man who would rather take care of business on their own that do it with their partner. I think you’ll find that men flick through these mags when they aren’t with a partner or when their partner isn’t interested in being with them.

      I agree that anyone who would rather have the mag and daydream than actually live it with their partner has some issues, but when it’s a choice between the mag and nothing (i.d a partner not willing to be part of it)... do you still see it as a big problem?

      Is it any different to a woman watching a romantic movie and wishing their partner was willing to do those romantic things rather than going out for a romantic dinner with their partner?

      I think in both cases the person would rather share with their partner, but when that’s not an option they live vicariously.

    • Sydney girl says:

      10:39am | 16/11/09

      Classic! To the point and I love the last paragraph.

      It isn’t stereotypical, of course not every single guy on the face of this earth behaves this way. But many do!

      It IS indeed unfortunate that there are men who have perfectly wonderful and loving wives and girlfriends, yet they choose to wank off to images of women they’ll never have. For heaven’s sake, appreciate what you do have and be lucky that you have a beautiful woman in your life!!!

    • Scott says:

      10:37am | 16/11/09

      I actually think it is all about fantasy and most sober men with functioning brains realise it ain’t ever, ever gonna happen. It’s like taking a nice break from reality before snapping back to the real world.

      In fact I would argue that men’s perving brain and relationship brain are quite seperate. Men will often look at - some would say objectify - and fantasize about the kinds of women they would never actually want to settle down with. A touch of Madonna/whore, I suppose.

      @Country Mum This is possibly something you should consider. I don’t think the women he looks at in porn have anything to do with the woman he is with. I am not saying his, what sounds to be an obsession is not an issue but you should probably look at your own self esteem issues. Are you really going to let him looking at porn ruin your relationship? Is he?

      @G The article does finish with “forget the lads mags, mag lads”, so if you’re not a lad mag lad then he clearly isn’t addressing you.

    • Chase Stevens says:

      10:35am | 16/11/09

      Some humor on the punch at last! You get one gold star!

    • Mistress D says:

      10:26am | 16/11/09

      G,
      You didn’t actually read the article did you? You just looked for any numbers that might appear in it that might indicate that 55% of all statistics were made up ( a ‘fact’ I’m sure you would have used to dispell any ‘supporting information’)

      The article was about, and correct me if I’m wrong children, that the women in magazines are just that….just women in magazines, that men should be happy with the flesh woman they have beside them rather than slobbering over someone who’s most probably not really that hot and definately not interested.

      I know there’s a lot out there that are happy with the women they have, that was the point. Hell, I know my guy looks at other women but I also hope that at the end of the day when I’m looking after him when he’s sick and telling him I’ll love him no matter what his body shape counts for more than a plastic set of boobs and air brushing.

      Though as a sidenote, there’s no such thing as a Level 11 Dungeon Master in WoW…. Dungeon Masters don’t exist in WoW.

    • DG says:

      10:24am | 16/11/09

      @Gregory (09:23am | 16/11/09)

      I think you are on the right track, but I don’t feel that it is as dire as all that.

      Simply put, the reasons that men’s Mags don’t sell love it that you have to sell all of the negatives that go with it - in laws, etc etc.

      It’s easier to sell the ‘adoration’ and support part of it without the negatives - i.e if they showed the same images with a truthful story about the persons obsession with shoes, nagging parents, vicious mood swings, constant complaining about men playing sports on weekends while she’d rather take him shopping and her desire to conquer the corporate world on her own, no man would buy it.

      Instead they tell only the positives - i.e attractive and some vague bits setting out her desire to be a perfect partner (I don’t know I’ve never actually read one).

      Just as women’s Mags talk about the emotional relationship, loyalty and respect of their partner without referring the negatives of his desire for sex a few times a week (and grumpiness when it doesn’t happen), leaving his dirty footy clothes on the bathroom floor, avoidance of the in-laws and his habit of getting drunk with his mates and forgetting their anniversary.

      Both sell the ideals, without the negatives. If a bloke was asked which he preferred:

      The hottie in the lads mag with the issues or a woman that was willing to accommodate all of the negative bits left out of the woman’s mag - there’s a bloody good chance he would choose the later as a partner.

      But it’s not something that is going to sell a magazine.

      ————————————
      Country Mum of teenage girls says:

      You said he’s got “The next 20 odd years of old age ALONE with only his air brushed teenage boob’s to wank to and pay TV to listen to.”

      He’s not getting any touching now…. I suppose it’s impossible to know which came first the porn or the reduction in touching. But given where he is now, he has the apparent choice of porn or nothing at all. You certainly aren’t going to suggest that he give up the porn and jump straight back into bed - it’s “give up porn and one day I might like you enough to touch the real thing” (i.e no compromise, given an offer that involved the real thing if he gives up the fake, he’d be an idiot not to take it up. Most guys would agree).

      It probably started with him eyeing of attractive people in the street, you getting offended and hence being less interested, with the lack of interest he turned to porn, the porn has resulted in your no interest, and now porn is the only option he has…. As I said, wheres the light at the end of the tunnel? He has nothing to gain here (nothing apparent) - only something to lose.

      Don’t interpret this as “he is faultless”. It’s simply been a spiral with 2 people reacting to each others actions - but from here I’d say there is a good chance he feels that it’s hopeless, and it appears that you feel the same. Neither willing to compromise one because they don’t feel like it, the other because they don’t see any hope.

    • AQB says:

      09:57am | 16/11/09

      Great piece!

    • G says:

      09:33am | 16/11/09

      Hmm interesting. As usual broad sweeping generalisations and stereotypes, no fact checking or supporting information.

      I disagree, I and most of my friends who are in the demographic that Zoo panders to don’t read it.  Most of my friends and other men I know prefer to read BRW, scientific american or choice magazine, Australian PC magazine or similar.

      However, I have noticed for example my girlfriend (who has a masters degree) only reads ‘Who’ magazine for the gossip and photo’s paying out celeberity women on the way they look/dress, or my high powered female boss only reads style magazines and new idea etc.

    • Kate says:

      08:56am | 16/11/09

      Great article. But women do this too. Oh sure, we complain about sexism and how lad’s mags present an unrealistic ideal of women as fake-breasted nympomaniacs that is completely out of touch with the ‘real’ woman. But there would be an alarming number of women out there right now - ranging from teenagers to middle-aged - who secretly have Robert Pattinson in the sort of ‘maybe’ file that you described.

      (Personally? I think Rob Pattinson’s a bit of a wuss. But if Christian Bale was to turn up at the local servo and randomly remove his shirt I wouldn’t say no.)

    • Country Mum of teenage girls says:

      08:33am | 16/11/09

      my man looks at porn on his laptop, mobile and work PC. what hope have I got ? My boob’s rate a 0 to his dream touching boobs he perves on 7 days a week.
      If only he thought like you, because the way he is living means no boob touching at all. His perving turns me off, I can not compete with air brushed boobs of girls 30 years younger than him and 25 years younger than me. So because of my feelings of competing with purt little boob’s, I am turned off him seeing and touching my boob’s 24/7.
      All he is doing is torturing himself with no relief in sight.It will be the cause of me walking out the door eventually, no doubt about it.
      Consider the fact that he is 49 and the boob’s he adores visually are 18 years old. In my mind that makes him a “dirty old man”. My daughters are older than the chicks he perves on.
      What a huge turn off for me.If it were only photos and not sexual acts, maybe I would not be quite as hurt, but I doubt it.
      All I can see in my mind is the simple fact that what he gets a lower brain kick out of is the equal to his step daughters in kinky positions of raunchy sex acts on public view for every Tom DICK and Harry.
      It has taken me 6 years to realise that my retirement years will be spent happily alone in a cheap unit after the last two teenage kids move out.
      So what has his roving lower eye gained him?
      The next 20 odd years of old age ALONE with only his air brushed teenage boob’s to wank to and pay TV to listen to.
      Sad and pathetic to see how dumb a man can really be when he is loved by a size 12 woman who used to enjoy a good romp.

    • EL says:

      08:25am | 16/11/09

      brilliant. smile

    • Gregory says:

      08:23am | 16/11/09

      “Love” has always eluded men’s magazines like Zoo, Ralph, or FHM. This deeply emotional and fearful response escapes the minds of most men. But you’re right Chris, love is an important thing. Maybe the most important of all. Now pass the Kool Aid.

    • Addy says:

      08:05am | 16/11/09

      GOLD!!!

    • JRH says:

      07:47am | 16/11/09

      Top Post!

    • Liz says:

      07:17am | 16/11/09

      Some sense at last, it’s the real women who count.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Weekend Punch: Tea or coffee?

Weekend Punch: Tea or coffee?

This is the week that Craig Thomson defended himself in Parliament, Schapelle Corby got clemency and…

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Last year, thousands of Azerbaijanis spontaneously took to the streets of Baku shouting and chanting.…

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Last month, Katy McCaffrey boarded the Disney Wonder cruiseliner. At some point during the trip, a sneaky…

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter