Dear oh dear – the Queen of Australia and her other realms and territories beyond the seas – is very angry. She’s sick and tired of the paparazzi lurking behind the clipped hedges at Sandringham – her multi million pounds holiday house in Scotland – taking pictures of the rollicking royals on their Christmas break.

Privacy? What privacy?

So angry is the Australian head of state, she’s threatening to invoke laws if any of the snappers are caught in the royal grounds – there’s nothing she can do if they stay outside the castle’s fences so the guess is ladders will be the orders of the day.

What the Queen fails to understand is that she, along with the other members of her family are nothing more or nothing less than paid public servants.

They get their fortnightly cheques from Whitehall – which are taxed these days – and they go about doing what they are paid to do : open; open fetes, cut ribbons, launch ships and other important day to day duties.

Being in the pay of politicians, means she heads a politician’s monarchy. Being the astute trooper she is, she does what the prime minister of the day orders, even reading from the throne in the House of Lords the government of the day’s legislative program.

This was illustrated when Tony Blair hauled her over the coals and reprimanded her for her lack of sympathy when Diana died and she was made to do the prime minister’s bidding. She knows which side of the bread the butter is on.

The situation she finds herself in these days is one of her own making.

A few decades ago she “let the light in” and approved a series of TV programs showing her and her family doing what ordinary people do – having picnics, watching TV, playing game and other mind bending pursuits.

Of course in letting in the light the monarch unwittingly did something she now obviously regrets.

She created a family of celebrities – of royals acting like lesser mortals: sister Margret giving a new meaning to boozing, Phillip insulting people right, left and centre, Harry in Nazi gear, William living in dad’s house with a “commoner” – the list goes on.

So it should come as no surprise to the Queen that the media is more than interested in the shenanigans of her offspring and other relatives.

It’s sad they don’t take a leaf out her book and behave themselves – either that or hand back their pay cheques and become private citizens.

Then they can as they do now…which is whatever they like but not at the expense of the hapless British taxpayer.

Barry Everingham is a Melbourne writer and commenter on royalty.

Most commented

20 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Darren says:

      07:48am | 08/12/09

      I think we should leave the queen and her bunch of parasites alone - when they stop suckling from the public teat.

    • Digby says:

      09:18am | 08/12/09

      Darren you sound like a typical republican. How much money has it personally cost to maintain the royal family. I reckon you would spend more money on drugs.

    • Old Bert says:

      10:26am | 08/12/09

      The royal family ought to have thought laterally, by inviting the paparazzi to afternoon tea on the lawns, and distributed some maundy money to the poor wretches., and asked nicely not to disturb their yuletide sorority. Furthermore, the ETS in it’s present form of cap and trade is doomed to fail.

    • 6c legs says:

      10:58am | 08/12/09

      Somebody forgot to tell Liz Windsor that Britain is now supposed to be a Class-less society.

      (anybody that truly believes Britain is Class-less? well, I gotta nice, well maintained, old bridge in Richmond. . . )

    • Andreas Jacobs says:

      11:08am | 08/12/09

      Her Maj is the worlds longest reigning monarch.  I reckon she has earnt the right to be a little cranky now and again, especially considering the behaviour of the press over there.  BTW Darren, it is the British press in question here that are the real parasites in this matter.
      Public property they may be, however everyone deserves some measure of privacy.
      Aa for the behaviour of some of the lesser ranked royals, why do you think Liz hasn’t handed over the crown yet?

    • Southernlight says:

      11:39am | 08/12/09

      So the Queen is a public Servant…does that mean that public servants don’t deserve privacy? Where is written in the law that the Queen is exempt from the laws of privacy and that those do not apply to her??

    • James Mc says:

      11:47am | 08/12/09

      Second longest reigning monarch…
      Thailand’s king has been on the throne longer.

      And we pay plenty - we have State Governors and a Governor General.

    • Matt says:

      02:48pm | 08/12/09

      If we became a republic we would still have to pay for a President, which would cost the same amount besides the extra cost of elections, if we even had an elected head of state unlike the politician’s republic proposed in the 1999 referendum. We would also have to pay for elected or appointed state Governors as to represent the individual sovereignty of the states outlined in the constitution. The problem for republicans is that there is no real need to change except to increase costs. A constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary democracy is the most stable form of government there is.

    • Liz says:

      12:07pm | 08/12/09

      Australia should have been a Republic years ago then we wouldnt be reading all this rubbish about Britain being a classless society and Queenie bleating about privacy.

    • Auman says:

      01:47pm | 08/12/09

      Your right Liz, you will be reading about the trashy Aussie drama actors, or the latest naughty celeb with a drink, drug or sexual issue, or the latest sports star beating a woman or worse, or the latest political member who has said the word ‘I hate my leader while out in the street’ or the latest ‘I slept with…. hang on while I check with my bank balance before saying more..’ ... Oh wait that is all happening now.

      I think if people, not just Liz, want to stop reading about all this rubbish… then stop reading about it.

      Unless people have been in the position of having camera’s in your face everytime you step out of your home, it is easy to denounce the person asking for peace.

    • TB says:

      12:24pm | 08/12/09

      Sandringham House is in Norfolk, England. I think you’re confusing it with Balmoral.

    • Drew (Darlinghurst) says:

      02:28pm | 08/12/09

      Its time for a RESIDENT for PRESIDENT.

      Its time we have an AUSTRALIAN as HEAD of STATE…..not some pommy woman in her 80’s.

      ABBOTT still believes that Betty Windsor is better suited as our head of state than an Aussie citizen.

      SHAME ABBOTT SHAME.

    • Garry says:

      03:19pm | 08/12/09

      Ah hell, Drew, do we want Mr. Rudd as President, or even Mr. Abbott, or Mr. Brown? Really do you?

      And isn’t our GG an Australian? Or are you worried about another dismissal? And the way Mr. Rudd is going with not talking to Australians….... grin

    • Mistress D says:

      06:13am | 09/12/09

      I don’t get it.

      When they show emotion, or try to show us they’re human, we condemn them for not being more rigid, but then demand they put up with us prying into their lives.

      When they act rigidly and try and be ‘strong’ we condemn them as heartless and cold.

      So what do we want of them?
      Liz, when did the Queen STOP Australia from becoming a Republic? Wasn’t that the Australian public who voted?

    • Connie says:

      06:55am | 09/12/09

      Sandringham is private property, with a public road running through the grounds, very lovely grounds too.  I could go on…

    • Shane says:

      09:09am | 09/12/09

      The Queen and the Royal Family should be able to use the law so much as any body else can.  Especially now that the rule of law is so firmly entrenched.  To suggest that she shouldn’t because she is paid to do a job is ludicrous. 

      Life isn’t just about money as, perhaps, this writer is implying.

    • Neil Bishop says:

      12:48pm | 09/12/09

      Yeah let’s get rid of the Queen and have a president like the United States of America. That’s worked out so well for them…. George W Bush, anyone? Seriously, the existing system is as close to perfect as we’re going to get. And the Queen is entitled to her privacy as much as anyone else.

    • Roy McKeen says:

      04:42pm | 09/12/09

      Matt says: “A constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary democracy is the most stable form of government there is.”
      How much stability has the Queen’s United Kingdom enjoyed over the last 40 years? More than 3,000 of Her Majesty’s subjects slaughtered and in excess of 40,000 injured in a vicious civil war at the heart of which is the Catholic/Protestant divide. At the pinnacle of this divide is the British/Australian monarchy which is based on anti-Catholic sectarian bigotry. This has been going on for over 300 years. It is embedded in the entire constitutional system of the United Kingdom and, de facto, in Australia’s constitutional system. People like Matt suffer from constitutional amnesia. Like the grovelling sycophants in the story of The King’s New Clothes they refuse to acknowledge that the monarchy is like a boil on the arse of democracy. It’s the cause of the problem! Until Australia takes a knife (metaphorically, of course) to the cause of the problem we will be cursed with a less than perfect form of democracy.

    • LynP says:

      06:47pm | 09/12/09

      The cost of a president would not be more than the current makeup we have now with a Governor General and state governors - The states can legislate for independence individually when we become a republic. We also would not be paying for any costs associated with the royal family such as visits to our country.

      The constitution is good but it can be made more stable and I hardly think a repeat of 1975 which is certainly on the cards now a precedent has been set makes for a ‘perfect stable system’. The inability of the reserve powers to be tested in a court of law adds to instability.  There are many other models on offer that offer the Australian people the transparency and democratic selection methods they desire, whilst still limiting the reserve powers of the Head of State so that a mandate from the people cannot be abused. The United States system has little support as a viable way to go.

      The Queen has not only not stopped us from becoming a republic, she has said we should get on with it. Prince Charles has also said he thought we would have been one long before now.

      Matt you really have to let go of 1999 - it is ancient history. and a lot of work has been done since then to come up with a selection method which addresses a lot of the concerns expressed at that time. The debate shouldn’t be about cost when we are talking about being an independent nation. Australians are very proud and rightly so. Why can’t we have a RESIDENT for PRESIDENT? -  someone who is an Australian citizen and shares our values and beliefs. I think it is a pretty good idea and so do 59% of Australians surveyed a month ago. 

      Kevin Rudd said it would not be addressed in his first term of government so I look forward to it being debated in earnest as soon as the next election is over.

      Not long now!

    • Brian says:

      09:58am | 11/12/09

      Get your facts right. Sandringham House is in Norfolk, not Scotland. It has been the private home of four generations of of the Royal Family since 1862. It is not the property of the British state, but a private house, where privacy is not an unreasonable expectation.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

@ajbau @mcilveenl The latest Nielsen Answers survey. 2,872,000 readers for April. Number one by 53k on the next - Ninemsn, Yahoo7, @SMH.

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @mcilveenl: http://t.co/1Jh1nNcelR Australia's number one news website, according to latest survey. http://t.co/ZRCmNMDN35

Daniel Piotrowski

@ajbau @newscomauHQ More than everywhere else.

tory_maguire

Go @newscomauHQ!! http://t.co/cqclJ0oqrl

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter