Reports of the big Australian-built car’s death are – as Twain quipped – an exaggeration, or at least grossly premature. But there’s no denying the patient has gone from just looking a bit poorly to possibly needing palliative care.

Holden Commodore isn't feeling too well. Mediocre PhotoShop job: Anonymous

The little Mazda3 trounced the 5-year top seller Holden Commodore in 2011, after the big boy slid about 12 per cent in sales. And the Ford Falcon fared worse with a 36 per cent slump. Between them, they hold 81 per cent of the large car segment, with the Aussie-built Toyota Aurion owning 12 per cent – but also diving 24 per cent in sales last year.

The large car segment overall was down 21 per cent in 2011, echoing three years of slides that have seen sales move from 139,677 in 2007 to 78,077 last year.

So over that time, the pulse has dropped 44 per cent. It’s fading. And only the most evasive physician would pretend otherwise. Tell ‘em, doc – they can take it.

The patient needs regular transfusions of sales lifeblood, but the pool of donors is steadily dwindling. And the defribillator application of funding shock-treatment hasn’t always hit the right target.

Long-time friends are increasingly tiptoeing into the room with a bunch of grapes and a minute of chit-chat, then looking at their watches before rushing off. To buy a different car.

Family members – particularly the smaller ones like Holden Cruze—are fluffing pillows and smiling. Mainly because they’re already carving up the estate.

Hard-core fans – and not a few hopeful foes – are gathered outside in a vigil. But even the faithful are buying fewer big cars too.

And some people are already grieving. There will be more joining the tissue-clutching group, and they’ll probably need expert counselling to get through the decline and bereavement.

For that, Elizabeth Kubler-Ross’s On Death and Dying gave us the textbook Five Stages of Grief theory.

Denial – this can’t be happening

Yes, it can. While the suggestion we’ll stop building large cars here amounts to treason in some minds, you need to look at the facts. It’s not a matter of ‘if we build it, they’ll come’ but ‘if they buy it, we’ll build it’.

Anger – it’s not fair, it’s not right, and it’s somebody’s fault

Sure you can blame it on rising fuel costs, tighter budgets, dwindling carparks… that might make you feel better for a few minutes. But pointing the finger at affordable imports and smaller cars is like blaming bread for being eaten in favour of cake.

Bargaining – how can we buy more time?

Wheel in the defribrillator again, make sure it’s fully charged, hit the right part of the body. But while you’re working on the large car, you could be neglecting smaller patients that could flourish here if the conditions were right.

Depression – it’s all too hard, so why go on?

Because it’s not just about the large car. There is a massive tetris-effect of interlocking industry that supplies and supports local car manufacturing. But if Holden, Ford and Toyota stop building here, it’s likely a lot of those businesses will fold. And then tetris becomes dominoes.

Acceptance – it’s inevitable and we’re at peace with it

Life goes on, and the future belongs to others. Acceptance is often strengthened by helping make provision for your descendants.

Kubler-Ross cautions that you might not go through all five grief stages or might go through them in a different order. And be warned that somebody near you might get stuck in the denial, anger or depression stage, sobbing hysterically and losing perspective. Give them support, buy them a drink, take them for a spin in a small car… they’ll move on.

Oh, and the handful of family members born and bred here request mourners at the funeral to not send flowers. Instead, you can keep making donations to the government’s Medicar system that—while flawed—is still crucial to keeping the industry healthy.

64 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • acotrel says:

      05:50am | 26/02/12

      We are now finding out the truth about Australian businesses - they cannot survive without protection.  For years Ford and Holden have sold us garbage knowing that the imports had been made uncompetitive by the tariffs they had succeeded in having applied.  If Australia is to become competitive in the globalised market, it must be on the basis of quality.  Most Australian companies have only paid lip service to ISO9000 Quality Management Systems.  The whole thing has been disingenuous.  What concerns me about the subsidies to the car industry is that they will still make crap which nobody really wants.  The impetus towards continual improvement won’t be there.  However the simple fact is that we cannot afford to lose this industry.  It is relatively hi-tech, and we don’t do anything else which is hi-tech !  If it falls below the threshold, there will be no way back.  When the resources boom ends our kids will be left with nothing in an intellectual/technology wasteland. Anybody who believes that Australia can survive on services and tourism industries is deluding themselves, they don’t really know where wealth really comes from.  How much value do money shufflers really add ?

    • Dave-o says:

      09:30am | 27/02/12

      You can hardly call the product they make crap when foreign car makers utilise the components that the major manufacturers generally co-develop.

      Your Mazda being a prime example of the fruits of the Australian auto industry and Japanese protectionism

    • Nath says:

      09:41am | 27/02/12

      Acotrel, to say that Ford and Holden have sold us garbage is a broad and unfair sledge.
      Admittedly, they have stuck with large car product when the market has moved toward smaller, but what they have built is not garbage, not by a long shot. Drive a new Falcon or Commodore - they are good! Don’t judge based on your last ride in a cab, which was probably a current looking model but had 600,000ks on it…...

      Holden’s move to build the Cruze in Australia, Ford’s innovations with EcoLPi & EcoBoost show a bit of flexibility - but flexibility requires investment - the more money, the quicker you can move to meet the market. And the market now wants economy, much much more than it did in a Pre GFC environment.

      Companies with large fleets are reducing fleet sizes, keeping fleet vehicles for 80,000ks rather than the old 40ks, and moving more towards novated leases. And when on a novated lease, people aren’t picking a Holden or a ford, as everyone will pick them as being a company car. Our corprate carpark might as well have a sign up for a Subaru & Mazda sales yard, as that is what it looks like out there!

      GM Holden invested a billion dollars in the leadup to the release of the VE commodore in 2006 - a billion dollars. On the reduced sales numbers, and a post-bankruptcy parent company, they will never commit that amount of money again. But the reality is, to create something decent for 2016 onwards, it would be time for a new platform, and they would need to commit at least this again.

      “However the simple fact is that we cannot afford to lose this industry.  It is relatively hi-tech, and we don’t do anything else which is hi-tech !”
      I agree 100% - you hit the nail on the head with this one.

      When we’ve sold the farm, sold the minerals underneath it, made education a luxury, what are we as a nation actually left with??

      I will think about that before I buy my next car.

    • Adrian says:

      09:38pm | 27/02/12

      We certainly need an automotive industry, but Holden needs to be more innovative.  Why they didn’t deliver a diesel Commodore with outstanding fuel consumption with their Green Grant I don’t know.  The E85 Commodore they “developed” was just a con… they’ve been exporting E85 capable Commodores to Brazil since the VT in the mid 90’s.  The diesel has been ready and put on ice for more than 3 years now thanks to US GM shelving several projects because of the GFC.  This could have saved the Australian large car, and Ford would have followed suit with the Falcon (seeing as the Territory now has a diesel, it would be a bolt in to the Falcon).

    • LC says:

      08:53am | 28/02/12

      @ Adrian,

      Holden didn’t develop an ethanol 85 engine, it developed an engine that can run on normal unleaded, in addtion to various ethanol blends: A flexi-fuel engine. It’s all well and good on paper, and in the US and Brazil, where many cars have been running on various ethanol blends since the turn of the century, it works. But here (at least for now), due to only a handful of petrol stations stocking e85, it’s defeated it’s purpose.

      I won’t argue with your points on diesel though. Holden’s woes with it are understandable considering the GFC, but Ford…Ford haven’t got an excuse, really.

      Diesels have been a bestseller amongst big sedans from the European 3, they’d be the same here. Holden and Ford’s only challenge is making sure it doesen’t sound like a light truck from the inside (this was a big turn-off factor from early diesel passenger cars).

    • ronny jonny says:

      06:00am | 26/02/12

      It is a crying shame that as a nation we have come to this. I have always regarded small car nations with a certain amount of contempt. A small car is fine for puttering around cities and tiny countries like the UK or NZ but our wide brown land demands a large, comfortable torque-y vehicle that can eat those long miles on smooth roads in comfort and with ease. Being a somewhat larger than average man I feel ridiculous crammed into a buzz box, ducking my head so it’s not jammed against the roof. My children aren’t exactly tiny either and to see the poor loves bent up with their knees around their ears in the backseat gives me a twinge of nostalgia for the old mans HQ with the wide, hot vinyl seats. Alas, it appears that with the cost of fuel and of building our behemoths locally those grand days may be over and we are all to be condemned to a motoring life where neccesity rules. A major step backwards in quality of life. Here we are, supposedly the richest we’ve ever been and we can’t afford a decent sized car. Very sad.

    • L. says:

      08:36am | 26/02/12

      “A small car is fine for puttering around cities and tiny countries like the UK or NZ but our wide brown land demands a large, comfortable torque-y vehicle that can eat those long miles on smooth roads in comfort and with ease.”

      Even if you don’t drive those long miles..?? which most buyers don’t. But even if they did, have you driven a new small car..?? New Golf, 3, Deso i30 etc… they’ll happily sit on 110Kph 3, up with luggage for almost ever…

      “Being a somewhat larger than average man I feel ridiculous crammed into a buzz box, ducking my head so it’s not jammed against the roof.”

      Rubbish… I stand 6’4”, and drive a 2002 Mazda Metro. I have inches of head room, and oodles of room.

    • marley says:

      09:38am | 26/02/12

      @ronny jonny - it’s not that we can’t afford a ‘decent sized” car - it’s that we don’t want one.  Most Australians live in highly urbanized environments, not out in the “wide brown land.”  They need a car that’s got good fuel economy for shortish drives, that is easy to park and that can accommodate their 1.8 offspring.  They don’t need a car that can eat up the miles because they seldom venture out of the CBD and if they do, it’s to go to the airport and fly to Bali.  Anyway, a lot of small cars are more fun to drive.

    • rudy says:

      11:12am | 26/02/12

      ronny, the ‘wide brown land’ view of car ownership is completely outdated. Cheap air fares have killed it. Families are taking fewer holidays in Australia and of those that do, fewer take a driving holiday. Result: fewer people can justify owning a large gas guzzler for the few days a year that the family is in it, on a trip of more than a couple of hours. If you live in a part of the city with good public transport,  you may not even need a car at all - but not enough people realise that yet.

      It’ll come though. Car ownership will dive in the next few decades.

    • scumbag says:

      01:46pm | 26/02/12

      Only problem with a small car is, with a trailer attached, the track width in same states should not be wider than the towing vehicle. That means we need to have trailers made to say, about 10ft x 4ft for the Barina or other toy car to pull the damaged one year old 3 piece lounge suite to the dump, along with the old 400 inch plasma tv, as the nuclear family is getting neck pains from watching tennis, and they’ve pulled the stuffing out of the lounge in excitement spasms from watching Home and Away. No, keep the Falcons and Holdens alive as the primary truck, and have one of those overpriced small ones for going to ‘work’, and carrying 4 shopping trolley’s worth of ‘groceries’, (mostly shit stuff), picking up the mother-in-law who intends to stay for a week, along with her ocean liner shipping trunks.

    • Condor says:

      03:56pm | 26/02/12

      scumbag
      No-one bothers with trailers anymore. We have Tritons and Hiluxes that can do that. Also, we have utes and 4WDs.

    • sunny says:

      11:20pm | 26/02/12

      I’ve been keeping my eye on Tesla motors (100% battery powered cars). They have built a good looking sports car and family sedan and might soon build a people-mover. I hope they build a large 4WD too just to prove it can be done. I reckon advances in battery technology is what everyone should be looking towards. If they build a battery pack that has say twice the endurance of the current crop (taking it to say 700+kms), then a whole range of vehicles will start taking up this power train. As cost of fuel / pollution then won’t be an issue, take your pick of whatever you want to drive. Maybe in about 10-15 years but “driven” by companies like Tesla.

    • M says:

      11:02am | 27/02/12

      Keep dreaming Sunny. Batteries aren’t anywhere near taking over yet, certainly not within 30 years.

      Hydrogen fuel cell is the future.

    • JP says:

      01:12pm | 27/02/12

      Sunny - I don’t trust the Tesla, from a reliability standpoint. I’m backing the Japanese over the Americans when it comes to high-end manufacturing, even if that leaves me with the small car again.

      Also - does running on power-grid electricity really mean we substitute oil for coal? What does that do to the carbon score of these ‘green’ cars? (I hope the powerpoint service stations at least run on solar!)

    • Musclecar74 says:

      09:25am | 28/02/12

      Agree, you cant beat a large family car. SUV’s are too top heavy and bulky. Work utes are just that - work utes. the only thing that comes close to the practicality of a big family car is a small one. Small cars have only got better as a consequence of being bigger.

      As a tall person, I want legroom and headroom. i dont always want to be rubbing shoulders with the passenger. Anything other than Australian, will have you paying double or triple the price.

    • TeeJay says:

      08:35pm | 28/02/12

      If you live in a part of the city with good public transport, well sorry i don’t I live in the country because that’s where i work and play, and I need that large car because I have a disabled son that I have to ferry to Melbourne every 3 months because of his condition his wheelchair doesn’t fit in your so called buzz boxes don’t get me wrong they are nice cars for what they are but not for me, I agree about time Holden and Ford bring out a diesel and make them cheaper to buy then they would both out do the imports.

    • The Old Man says:

      07:43am | 26/02/12

      Our government gave vast amounts of OUR money to Toyota to build the hybrid Camry. Made us all ‘feel good’ about saving the environment and stopping ‘global warming’. Well where are the sales of the Hybrid Camry, down the toilet?

      I am particularly affronted after GMH, having gone, cap in hand again, to the government, to hear about the latest wages deal they have agreed to!

    • Jim says:

      05:59pm | 26/02/12

      Spot on Old Man…the REAL reason why Australian manufacturing is not competitive! Got absolutely nothing to do with quality as acetroll always harps on about.

      Can anyone tell me why our illustrious leader, when meeting with ‘car industry representatives’, only really met with union thugs who barely got their snouts out of the trough long enough to complain, and didn’t meet with, well, car industry representatives?

    • stephen says:

      06:29pm | 26/02/12

      BMW has been for 10 years working on a car which uses hydrogen to power an internal combustion engine, and I think it will be a winner.
      Not sure about battery engines.
      Batteries use electricity to re-charge, and coal-powered stations to maintain the current.
      Seems a waste of economic sense to me.

    • neil says:

      09:28pm | 26/02/12

      The GMH wages deal is their way out of massive redundancy payouts, They will be able to sack 70% of their manufacturing work force and blame it on the union and Gillard will cover the cost.

      Unions and Labor are so dumb.

    • Fiddler says:

      08:05am | 26/02/12

      As yet once again we are screwed over by governments being more interested in protecting unions and big business. Our cars are second rate and overpriced. The only thing more overpriced are the far better imports due to the monopolies the government allows over importing on order to protect our industry.
      Yes it will cost jobs, but we currently pay close to a hundred grand a year per job being protected in subsidies. We also pay over twice as much as the rest of the world for cars.

    • Fred says:

      08:15am | 26/02/12

      I don’t see the problem, it’s only $100 million and we spend billions on welfare.

    • Fiddler says:

      10:58am | 26/02/12

      yeah except when you want to buy a car and realise we a paying twice as much as the rest of the world for cars. THAT is the real cost.

    • Dan Webster says:

      10:51am | 26/02/12

      But Japan doesn’t build a 6ltr V8 that can be purchased for under $45k.

      Australia, the country that now imports everything as we no longer make anything.

    • Tubesteak says:

      11:47am | 26/02/12

      The longer we waste money on propping up inefficient and uncompetitive industries the worse off we will be. That’s hundreds of millions of dollars that could have gone into the education system creating employees for the 21st century that werent intent on sitting at a machine pressing a button for 40 years on 10 times the salary of an overseas counterpart

      Australia will never compete on quality because you’ll never convince consumers that a falcodore is the equivalent of an S500

      We don’t need big cars because we now fly long distances on cheap airlines. Most of our trips are short distances of well under an hour

      Propping up the industry is all about jingoism. Time to stop

    • GB says:

      03:12pm | 26/02/12

      Yep. Too right tubesteak. Yet small businesses, which really are the backbone of our economy, are failing at record rates in the past 12 months. Pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into an uncompetitive and terminal industry, just to appease their union cronies, at the expense of these small businesses really shows how backward thinking these clowns are.

    • acotrel says:

      07:07am | 27/02/12

      @Tubesteak
      ‘Australia will never compete on quality because you’ll never convince consumers that a falcodore is the equivalent of an S500’

      Remember when the Japanese stuff was all garbage ? You can cease making cars and spend the money on education - what hi tech industries will the graduates work in ? Will they all become accountants and artists ?

    • Pickles... The Drummer says:

      12:15pm | 27/02/12

      @acotrel - Have to agree its all about quality. Germany pays high wages, invests in innovation and new platforms, and has higer commercial rent than Oz, yet makes money building cars and other stuff. How? They build quality that people will pay for.

      What did Australia never figure this out? We kept churning out the same unfinished crap. And don’t tell me its awesome quality people, its well below European, worse than Japanese, slightly better than South Korean and way better than Chinese. With our wages we should be building German level cars.

      Stop funding the sinking ship, its like polishing the brass on the Titanic.

    • Tubesteak says:

      04:38pm | 27/02/12

      Stop living in the past, acotrel. We don’t need “hi-tech” industries. They are secondary industries. We need to focus on tertiary industries. This means accountants, bankers, lawyers, doctors and other service professionals whose skills are needed here and can’t be shipped overseas due to the need for local skill and knowledge. As was said in a thread elsewhere, we can develop the IP here and then get overseas to do the manufacturing. We can finance and set up the company here to benefit from that.

    • LC says:

      08:26am | 28/02/12

      Acotrel is 100% correct Tubesteak. Something that resembles a manufacturing industry is required. Without one, post mining boom, where will all the unskilled workers go?

      The best manufacturing we can support here is not the creation of clothing or plastic toys the like, but rather the manufacturing of high-tech objects, like computer components, aircraft components and motorized vehicles, cars trucks, buses, heavy machinery. We would be insane if we tried to manufacture everything we use here ourselves, but we definately must manufacture some of it.

      Although Acotrel’s support of a local manufacuring industry is ironic considering his support of a carbon tax which does nothing for the enviroment and really only serves to encourage local manufacuring operations to offshore.

    • rohan says:

      03:40pm | 26/02/12

      For anyone who knows anything about the auto industry, you would know its all about volume. They cant sell enough Australian cars to make them any cheaper but thats exactly what they need to do. Maybe instead of this money given to the car industries, they should give incentives through medicare to buy Australian made cars or cheaper rego.

    • stephen says:

      05:05pm | 26/02/12

      Our homemade cars are not second rate.
      And if the average journey is under an hour, and urban, then surely a Holden or a Ford is up to it ?

      An alternative scenario is one where the floorpans we use in our local cars are designed overseas and used for their own markets, but we design our own cars floor up.
      That means we have smaller vehicles.
      The commodore and falcon are dustbinned, and extra effort is used on quality.

      Have a look at , (and besides the local offerings like Modern Motor and Wheels, both excellent mags) Motor Trend, (USA) and Autocar (UK).
      They often print the latest GM and Ford offerings that will make it into overseas production, and if we do decide to use European or American underpinnings, I can tell you now, local drivers are in for a real treat.

    • Michael R says:

      06:04pm | 26/02/12

      “Life goes on, and the future belongs to others”. Ah, the mindless optimism inherent in all free trade ideologues. To whom exactly does the future belong? If we don’t make cars then what do we make?

      Don’t expect free traders to answer these questions because all they have is hope and faith in the ideology of free trade. But in reality, we are being priced out of the market in far more than we can compete.

      In America we can see where the demented ideology of free trade leads if you are not blessed with a minerals boom i.e. it leads to massive irrecoverable unemployment.

      I am sick to death of free trade advocates who tell us what isn’t working but NEVER tell us what WILL work. And that’s because they don’t know. And that’s because the theory is fundamentally flawed and doomed for the scrapheap of ideologies-in-a-bubble that don’t work in the real world.

      Moderate protectionism is the only thing that will allow us to shape our economy, as opposed to being shaped by the desires of China.

    • Condor says:

      09:39pm | 26/02/12

      Wrong. We have been saying it for decades. we need to work in areas where we have a comparative or absolute advantage. For Australia this means concentrating on white collar professional jobs such as engineering, law, banking, architecture.

      The most profitable companies in the world develop the IP locally but manufacture overseas eg Apple. They retain all the rights to it but leave the grunt work to be done by cheaper labour sources. Not only do they retain the IP but they use local financiers and local legal experts to protect and dvelop their company. This is the future for Australia.

    • St. Michael says:

      12:05am | 27/02/12

      “In America we can see where the demented ideology of free trade leads if you are not blessed with a minerals boom i.e. it leads to massive irrecoverable unemployment.”

      America’s problems come primarily from the size of its government debt: presently at World War 2 levels with no worldwide war to fight, and rising literally every minute.  And that debt comes overwhelmingly from far too much government spending (vote buying, that is) on various “entitlement” programs, which will eventually wind up like all socialist programs: fine until you run out of other people’s money.  America has not been a free trade economy since roughly the late fifties or so.  It is indeed a testament to the success of its model that it managed to keep feeding the leftie vampire as long as it did.

      “I am sick to death of free trade advocates who tell us what isn’t working but NEVER tell us what WILL work. And that’s because they don’t know. And that’s because the theory is fundamentally flawed and doomed for the scrapheap of ideologies-in-a-bubble that don’t work in the real world.”

      Two things: first, it’s a bit rich to expect perfection out of free trade when it works better than any other economic ideologies and nobody’s yet designed a perfect one that works.

      But in terms of what will work, we actually do have such an example: Germany, after 1945.  Google the term “Wirtschaftswunder”—the economic miracle—and you’ll see how a country which had no flower of its youth left and had been bombed back into the Stone Age managed to build itself into the pre-eminent economy of Europe, paying back all of its war reparations and Marshall Plan payments by 1972.  Not to mention that the flower of its intellectual capacity had also been airlifted to serve the US (Von Braun, Einstein, etc.)

      Primarily, it happened because the (West) Germans created a free trade environment and cut red tape.

      As for what will work to pull America and the West out of the crap, here’s the full plan: http://web.archive.org/web/20101124065307/http://johntreed.com/growth.html

      Moderate protectionism at best leads to the exact situation that the Australian car industry finds itself in, or at worst to trade wars which can result in the Great Depression—Google the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act and you’ll see what happens when you engage in protectionism to even a practical, if not its absurd, conclusion.

    • azzure says:

      06:38pm | 26/02/12

      Once you buy a euro you will not even entertain the thought of a Holden or a Ford. They are so far behind the 8 ball its not funny.

    • stephen says:

      07:32pm | 26/02/12

      That’s garbage.
      German, Italian and French car makers are excellent, no doubt about it, (and especially the 3 series BMW which apparently uses a better metal in their engines) but apart from some GM cars in the US, (which still use live axles and and they construct their bodies as a ‘sit on’ ) Holden and Ford are as good, price for price, as anything else.

      The only problem is that our cars no longer take a family of 4 to Shepparton, or to Perth.
      We fly there because the fares are cheap, and we can use our phones, whereas when you drive, you have to concentrate.
      If the big 2 make our cars smaller, (and I remember seeing in Wheels mag, about 6 years ago a new Torana liftback. Forgotten its designation, but it was purple with white leather interior ! Fantastic, but it never made it to production) then we can outsell Mazda and Toyota.

      Isn’t that what we want ?

    • acotrel says:

      06:59am | 27/02/12

      @Stephen
      ‘Holden and Ford are as good, price for price, as anything else.’

      When they build a car which is better than a Mazda 6, I’ll buy one ! The Holden Camira of the mid-eighties was a bloody insult ! Their small cars these days are usually badge engineered models from overseas. I live 200km from Melbourne, and often drive there down the Hume.  The Mazda is comfortable, fast, economical, has cruise control, is a joy to drive. It’s motor is 2.4 litre - big enough for anyone.

    • Dave-o says:

      07:05am | 27/02/12

      Once you service a euro, you could save the local auto industry 3 times over

    • alex says:

      03:22pm | 01/03/12

      acotrel - ‘better’ is in the eye of the beholder. How can you assume to know what suits everyone? - “It’s motor is 2.4 litre - big enough for anyone”. I for one wouldn’t buy a 6 sorry - its 2.4 litre unfortunately is not powerful enough for me. Shock horror, I know. But after owning 380s for years I could never go back to the power-weight ratio of a 6 unless I had to. A 6MPS now that’s a different story, but it’s just too expensive for me.

    • stephen says:

      07:53pm | 26/02/12

      By the way, Memo to Brisbane Porsche at Newstead :

      They’ve got, I think, a ‘95 911 in the showroom, but it has the wrong wheels on.
      The wheels offered on that car were only first put on the late’98 911, which was the first of the water-cooled engines - the 996, probably the most popular version, by sales, of any 911.

      The car actually looks like a Ron Wanless Special - you know, ‘go grab your spanner and build it yourself’, sort of thing.
      And the tyres are oversize.

      The ‘97 Targa, white, is my favourite.
      I’ve driven one around beach road in Melbourne in ‘99.
      Better than food, sex, or a tax refund.

    • neil says:

      08:48pm | 26/02/12

      I’ve never owned a “big car”, well there was that 7 litre Mercedes Limo but that was an anomaly. I’ve driven more than most people will in a lifetime and have been involved in the “base design” of all Holden large cars since 1996 and Fords since 2000. I left the industry in 2008 but those base designs are still current.

      Is the Aussie big car finished? No The Falcon is finished and the Aurion should be allowed to die a natural death asap. The Commodore will be with us for a long time at least the next decade and probably longer as it will take up the slack from the demise of the others. But this does not have to sound the end of the Australian car industry, Holden is the only manufacturer of the Cruze Hatch and this will expand their export opportunities.

      When I stated working for Toyota in 1989 I could not understand why they didn’t build Land Cruisers in Aust, we were then their biggest market followed by Saudi Arabia and they had adopted our design rules for convenience. Toyota Aust and Holden pinned their future on exporting engines and aluminium these are energy (electricity) and resource Iron ore and bauxite) intensive with low labour perfect for cheap ore and power. The carbon tax and the pending MRRT have wiped that competitiveness so engines and alloy wheels are no longer viable. Holden is trying to adjust but Toyota must build a mid size 4WD/SUV (Kluger) in Aust or close up shop.

      Ford will most likely continue with the Falcon ute until about 2016 long after they have replace the sedan with a local version of the Mondeo hoping to find export markets in Asia and they may try building an American SUV with the same objective.

      The future of Holden and Ford is in their engineering and especially their testing facilities and their proximity to Asia, Ford designed the Ranger and Mazda BT-50 utes’ in Aust but builds them in Thailand, Holden already builds a version of the Caprice in China and it’s only a matter of time before they build the Commodore sedan there, the ute may stay in Aust.

      The carbon tax and MRRT will eventually kill off Toyota and the remaining Nissan and Mitsubishi facilites.

    • HappyCynic says:

      08:11am | 27/02/12

      80% of the population or more live in cities, and we rarely, if ever, leave them anymore.  Why the hell would we want a monstrous, 2 tonne, 6.2 litre V8 behemoth?  Sure, they’re great cars with great personality (like a big lumbering, happy dog, tail wagging all the time) and they eat up the miles like little else, but living in the city means small expensive parking spots, idiot drivers and their terrible 4WDs, traffic lights every 20 metres.  there just isn’t room anymore for the V8 and everyone who isn’t stupid enough to buy a 4WD has woken up to that fact.

    • marley says:

      08:32am | 27/02/12

      I live out in the country, so none of the problems you describe (lots of 4WDs, but they all have real mud on them).  And I get by very nicely on a 2 L, 4 cylinder car.  So do a surprising number of friends and neighbours.

    • prosperity says:

      08:33am | 27/02/12

      The problem is that they are just not very good.

    • M says:

      11:09am | 27/02/12

      Rubbish. They’re brilliant cars. It’s just that they aren’t what australia wants to buy anymore.

    • LC says:

      10:53am | 27/02/12

      The Coalition would have also handed out cash to local car manufacturers too. Neither party wants to be seen as responsible for the death of local car manufacturing. There are still plenty of people passionate about our local industry, and with good reason.

      Sadly, Toyota’s Aurion is finished. Plain and simple. Ford looks like it’s going that way too, though they’ll still be importing cars way into the future. Holden may save themselves yet with their locally manufactured Cruze, and if they add the Barina to the lineup, their future is secure.

      All of big cars made here are amongst the best built and best value cars of their size in the world. Some of our local offerings would make the Yanks green with envy; they don’t have a lot of choice anymore when it comes to large cars (it’s all SUVs and medium-large FWD cars now). But for the short-term at least, large Aussie-built cars look like they’re going to become a fleet and niche market. Local manufactures don’t need to have a line-up of 10 small cars, but if they produce 2 each, they’ll have a future.

      Local big car sales could be boosted by the incorporation of diesel powertrains (as seen in the Big 3 German marquees) or by the introduction of e85.

    • Sir Osis says:

      11:05am | 27/02/12

      For all those bemoaning the death of the large Australian car…. when was the last time you put your money where your mouth was, and bought one, brand new? Never? I thought so.

      I drive a large Aussie car. But I bought it 5 year used, when quick depreciation and availability made it ideal for my family situation, but would I buy one new? Unless I won the lottery, probably not. Most people in love with the big aussie car got their vehicle in a similar situation,  a used, ex-lease or ex-company/executive car, and that is how its been done for decades.

    • TeeJay says:

      06:28pm | 29/02/12

      I agree the Australian large cars are to expensive to buy new,  cheaper to buy a small car so how can they compete. Some people need a larger car but cannot buy new so second hand is the only way to go.

    • Country Realist says:

      12:26pm | 27/02/12

      People who denegrate the locally made cars have no idea what you are talking about.  If you actually do some research on the technology in these cars, you would correct yourselves! Unfortunately alot of it is about perception. The perception is that Falcon, Commodore buyers are bogans.  Also, as mentioned earlier, the market has shifted to smaller cars.

    • robot from the future says:

      01:08pm | 27/02/12

      The industry is simply fixed. Copy the production techniques of the market leaders. They did it to us decades ago, and then made them more efficient and cheaper. The result is the current market.

      Globalisation has initiated the greatest race to the bottom the globe has ever seen. So beat them at it in a few easy steps.

      1) Halve car manufacturer employee wages. Double working hours. Remove penalty rates. Make them work twice as long for half as much money.
      2) Remove ridiculous, expensive and time-consuming OH&S legislation and the self-serving, self-righteous leeches in the HR department.
      3) Take away the right to litigation.

      Once this is done, the car industry fixes itself and we will begin selling our locally produced cars to China and Japan!

      Don’t like it? Don’t work. See you on the production chain!

    • realist says:

      01:19pm | 27/02/12

      The real problem is too many highly paid, lowly educated drones on the factory floors. Suppliers of parts are paid far too much. Transport costs are ridiculous. Australian made just costs too much. Everything is far too expensive. It is more attractive to buy the same thing from Asia at half the price. I notice that there are a lot of good imported cars available for cheaper than ever before. Money talks. Cheapest wins every time when quality is comparable. A car is a car. Many different brands of cars are made in the same factories by the same people using the same parts. Only the brand name is different, and brand is quickly becoming meaningless as more wake up to this.

    • Hicks says:

      03:28pm | 27/02/12

      This I find myself agreeing with.

      Holden quality isn’t anymore. The same can be said with Audi. When I sat in their TTRS, which has a 6 figure price tag, the build quality was on par to the cheaper asian built vehicles - screws in plain view, cheap plastics misaligned edges etc etc etc.

      But you must also understand you can’t have a Jaguar quality car for cheap. If you have a cheap budget, your car will reflect that and Holden/Ford all companies are cutting costs to fulfill those expectations.

      So you can’t have everything. The majority market wants cheap and as good as possible. As far as Holden/Ford go, they’re still selling units by the load and of every 10 cars on the road I see, 5 are Holden/Ford.

    • John Oh says:

      04:32pm | 27/02/12

      Im driving an 1985 Corolla and its just as eco friendly as the latests cars. With 175,000 kms on the clock mine was driven by three littleold ladies, whose brother was a mechanic.  Saved amny thousands of dollars. Thank you toyota.

    • neil says:

      09:05pm | 27/02/12

      You are delusional, your piece of crap pumps ouy at least twice as much crap as a new 6 litre Holden. You’re like the idiots that buy a motorcycle and think they are making a differance, motorcycles are not required to meet polution laws they pump out as much as 300% more polution than a modern car, yet wankers smuggly ride around thinking they are superior then blame car drivers with their ABS brakes and air bags when they get run over. IDIOTS, just like the wankers who by a Toyota Prius, it runs on coal and produces 6% more CO2 than a Commodore V6. MORONS!

    • Buddha says:

      09:28pm | 27/02/12

      As someone who owns a V8 Falcon and a Corolla wagon, I’d just like to make a couple of points.

      Firstly, nearly all car-building nations provide government money and protection to their vehicle manufacturers, mostly far more than Australia does.

      More importantly, I’m disgusted in the priority people place on bagging out each other’s choices while the very big threat to many thousands of Australian jobs isn’t even considered.

      The bogan element is prevalent amongst all vehicle types.  The proof is seen around every Australia Day when the drunken bogans get their free Aussie flags out of their bulk beer purchase and proudly attach them to their imports ... and they think they’re being patriotic!

    • Mal says:

      08:11pm | 28/02/12

      Commodore was the sales leader for 15 years not 5 as stated in the opening of this artical!

    • MARK says:

      01:10pm | 29/02/12

      I think both Aussie cars Falcon And Holden are world class. Just two years behind in the update cycle.Shame.Kiwis and Aussie are still proud of them.
      Thousand flock to watch them race at Bathurst. Maybe   the SUV is the car that is killing them. They are bigger and thirstier but it convenience that people want now.Not so worried about its 0-60 time any more Just look at Territory sales.
      in both countries.Going gang busters. Holden ,You need to make an SUV

    • Graham says:

      10:49am | 01/03/12

      Just recovering from a T-bone accident (LHS) in my Commodore. Wife might not be here if I had a smaller car.
      Commodore just needs a 2L turbodiesel to make it a winner

    • Graham says:

      10:49am | 01/03/12

      Just recovering from a T-bone accident (LHS) in my Commodore. Wife might not be here if I had a smaller car.
      Commodore just needs a 2L turbodiesel to make it a winner

    • Declan says:

      11:57am | 01/03/12

      It matters little what engine Ford or Holden put in their cars, how fuel efficient they are or what price they sell them at (a discount of 20-25% on retail is common), the market simply doesn’t want what they are offering.  They are demonstrably lower overall quality than most modern cars. And there is good reason why.  They simply don’t make anywhere near enough of them to be able to invest in globablly competitive platforms and quality engineering.  Car making is a very high fixed cost business, so volume is everything.  VW has said it is impossible to make a competitive car of global standard at less than 300,000 units off one platform.  They make serious money because they make gazillions more than that off the Golf platform.

      I would love to buy an SS Sportswagon because my children are turning into baskeballers and I drive plenty of country miles and carry loads. I like the way it drives.  But I just can’t face another poor quality product, crappy interior, electircal issues and inefficiency etc.  There are much better ways to get legroom.  And Holden is never going to be able to make way over 300,000 of them so be able to invest properly in their car.  Sad, but true.

      And private buyers (the profitable ones) are departing in droves to options better suited to their needs, because they prefer “better” products.  Fleets are voting with thier feet too.  The world has changed.  I’m no snob, so I would buy a Holden or Ford if is was as good as other cars I can buy.  But since they aren’t, I won’t.  Like most other people.  Many people don’t notice or care about the diffeence and are happy to drive them.  Obviously, more people are caring now.

    • alex says:

      04:19pm | 01/03/12

      True but if falcadores were built with higher quality interiors but still kept their performance, they would then be more expensive. An SS is about 50k. You can’t go that quick in a similarly sized, comfy and practical car without buying secondhand. So it’s expected there would be some sort of sacrifice when buying from the falcadore line up as they are cheaper than rivals but offer better overall performance. One could look at it as a trade off I suppose - Falcadores sacrifice a bit on quality but gain in performance, imports favour quality but then you miss out on the over-all performance. If you want both in a car then you pay the extra for it (like comparing a v6 Accord to an SV6) - and that’s what people don’t seem to get when judging falcadores.

    • Adam says:

      01:49pm | 09/03/12

      If people would stop buying 4 wheel drives as their family cars which cost more to run than a V8 Commodore (and lots more to buy) then these cars would survive.
      Apart from 7 seats (if you really want to call the dicky seats, seats) there is nothing 90% of 4wds do that the Falcodore can’t.
      When you add serivicing costs again the big Aussies are better.
      I can understand the Mazda 3 being a top seller. It’s a great car. I can’t understand why there are so many 4wds on the road in the city and at schools.

    • realist muslce car says:

      03:14pm | 09/03/12

      People keep on about people now flying as it is so cheap therefore they dont drive long distances anymore is rubbish in WA no flight is cheap and if you want to go away for a weekend you drive.  People are in a fairy land if you think any manufacturer will do anything with any other fuel source until they have to and no one will pay for an overpriced small car to save the enviroment until they have no choice as the cost is far too high.  I like a large car and would never own a small car no matter the cost but thats my choice.  I have just bought a new muscle car and when I cant get one here I will import from then on.  All the new small cars are always getting bigger thats why people are going for them no one really wants a tiny car besides who would feel safe with that lttle protection!!!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Last year, thousands of Azerbaijanis spontaneously took to the streets of Baku shouting and chanting.…

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Last month, Katy McCaffrey boarded the Disney Wonder cruiseliner. At some point during the trip, a sneaky…

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

ClubsNSW is set to introduce a fresh new effort to combat schoolyard intimidation, insisting on a principal’s…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter