Is it time for Australian media powers to draw up a code of conduct to deal with spin doctor demands?

Free to air? Photo: News.com.au

Championing the media and their moguls may not be fashionable right now given the UK’s phone hacking scandal, and Labor and the Greens calling for their own inquiry off the back of it.

Nevertheless public relations spin is endemic and enduring.

A piece in Britain’s The Times on Thursday last week addressed the pain journos sometimes suffer when they interview a movie star and their publicists sit in the same room vetoing questions.

The story revealed how some reporters had to sign documents promising they would not ask subjects about taboo issues, such as drug habits or celebrity flings.  Such censorship leaves reporters to write clichés about how actors ad lib and live to “serve” scripts.

In Australia politicians have dressed up in tutus just so they reach households. But they will also try dictating who and what joins them in photos, how journalists talk to other talent, and what information runs beforehand.

Some journalists who are young, over-worked, and facing crazy deadlines see no choice but to comply. So could those who run our media join to empower scribes from local rags to national mastheads?

Let them enshrine a journalist’s right to address public figures on any issue, and to report fairly with an industry-wide agreement.

Perhaps this is misplaced idealism, and impossible to enforce, but media consumers are crying out for substantial news.  What stops groups such as News Limited and Fairfax uniting to help reduce the problem?

Maybe it’s because a code would be demeaning to good journalists who already skirt PR bullies with skill and courage. Laurie Oakes did report a whole budget once before it reached parliament. However, media-controlled environments will exist for some time so something must be done.

It could be an industry-wide code, or continuing newsroom-led analysis, training, and solutions to PR trends. Hopefully some answers are found, have been found, or are being found.

That’s not too much to ask. 

33 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Sceptic says:

      05:40am | 28/07/11

      ‘Maybe it’s because a code would be demeaning to good journalists who already skirt PR bullies with skill and courage.’

      Courage? It must be pretty scary not knowing if you are going to come home each day.  Who knew journalists required such ‘courage’?

    • Tom says:

      12:08pm | 28/07/11

      I notice no-one asks the PM about her EMAs. “Courage”?

    • S.L says:

      06:47am | 28/07/11

      I don’t think the problem lies with celebrity minders and what you can ask their charges but how the journo interprets, edits and spins what the interviewee has said.

    • Carter says:

      08:43am | 28/07/11

      Good call @S.L.

      If you’re interviewing someone, surely they have a right to not give you some information that they don’t want talked about (drugs, sex, etc). A “minder” just has the forsight to give advice to their client on what may come back to haunt them.

      Contrary to what the media may think, a role in a movie or some money doesn’t mean a person is public property. When that person seeks out media, it’s a little bit of a different story (Paris Hilton) and they need to deal with it.

      There is, after all, a line between the public interest and what the public may be interested in.

    • Steve says:

      11:48am | 28/07/11

      Agree with Carter - its a media interview, not the Spanish Inquisition.

      Besides, why would you have any faith in a journalist looking for a career-enhancing scoop to accurately and fairly relay your answers?

    • Mahhrat says:

      06:52am | 28/07/11

      A “Code of Conduct” akin to the various Real Estate Acts?  An overarching legal document that enshrines the rights of journalists to report the news, and the responsibilities of journalists to do so with appropriate integrity?

      I reckon that is a fantastic idea. 

      Problem is, who’s going to police it?  The government?  And “Independant Body” like the ACCC?

      I’ve got a better idea.  Why don’t you just forget the money you want to make, and focus on the job you wanted to do when you were 12?

      Pollies want to control the media for power.  Media want to control it for money.  Both reasons are unjustifiable, but you’ve worked together for so long while the system remained status quo.

      The fact is, we quiet majority and simply sick of both of you.  It’s not even rage we feel, it’s apathy.  We don’t care about Gillard, we don’t care about Abbott, we don’t care about whatever independents in other states are doing.  Similarly, we don’t care about Murdoch getting pied in a courtroom.  It’s all other people.

      You and the government both did things to “divide and conquer” us.  Well, it worked.  We want nothing more to do with either of you.

      Stop pretending that we care what happens to the “Young Journo rushing to a deadline.”  The only reason he has to “rush” and “compromise on his principles” is because you made it that way.

      Doctor, heal thyself.

    • Direct says:

      10:13am | 28/07/11

      Brava, Mahhrat. Brava.

    • Tom says:

      12:16pm | 28/07/11

      “Problem is, who’s going to police it?” ... Bob Brown, of course.

    • ibast says:

      12:51pm | 28/07/11

      “Problem is, who’s going to police it? “

      The Advertising Standards Boards is the perfect example of how industry self policing doesn’t.  I put in a complaint to them about how a particular ad in a women’s magazine was sexist against men.

      The claim was rejected on the grounds that the ad was meant in jest and the target audience was women.  I was left to wonder if the same standard would be held to racial advertising in magazines targeting white people.

      Back OT, self policing wont work, because the industry no longer has journalistic standards.  As Q points out (below) most articles are opinion pieces and I will add most are written in 15 minutes flat.  Getting something out there is much more important than getting it right.

      So we have Allen Jones saying today he doesn’t have to give real facts on climate change because he isn’t a journalist.  Well he’s right there, but his listeners believe what he says to be factual.  Who’s going to drag him out of the gutter and enforce standards on him?

    • Mr Cynic says:

      07:44am | 28/07/11

      I can’t think the spin doctors would have placed too many “demands” on you when you worked on The Centralian, Chris, but perhaps the quid pro quo could be a clause in the journo’s code where reporters can’t blame sub editors for mistakes when PRs politely pick them up on sloppy work.

      Just a thought.

    • Huey says:

      07:58am | 28/07/11

      and then fearless journo asks P.M. about planking!!! Any one remember PLANKING..social scourge? end of civilization as we know it etc etc. We want a media inquiry here because of??? or do we just want be involved. Waste a bit more money? let’s have a voluntary code

    • Margot says:

      08:22am | 28/07/11

      Erick must be have called in sick today.

    • Jester says:

      09:15am | 28/07/11

      Erick only shows up if he gets an appearance fee.

    • Markus says:

      11:11am | 28/07/11

      Erick doesn’t get out of bed for anything less than $10,000 a day.

    • Kevin says:

      02:04pm | 28/07/11

      Yes, as someone who likes predictability in my morning routine, his absence was very annoying.
      I had difficulty with my bowel movements as a result.

    • sylvie says:

      05:26pm | 28/07/11

      Choice comment, Kevin.
      Very funny -  and welcome, after the carry-on over the Lemon piece.

    • Flutz says:

      08:29am | 28/07/11

      If Journos were serious about this, they whould refuse to interview “celebrities” or “people in the public eye” of any kind, if they put restrictions on what subject can be addressed and/or what questions could be asked. After all the subjects of their interviews require the publicity and attention the interview provides, so if journos refuse to deal with them they will quickly do away with the publicists who are not doing their jobs in ensuring publicity. Unfortunately many in the media are complicit in the little games played by these publicists, which has created the current day situation.

    • OchreBunyip says:

      08:39am | 28/07/11

      Journalism is confused with entertainment and a work of entertainment does not require honesty, integrity or even facts. Take a look at the picture in the article - that is not a news programme that is an entertainment show complete with guests. The signal to noise ratio in journalism is such that factoids, polls and spin are drowning out any valuable signal that may convey useful news.

    • fairsfair says:

      09:20am | 28/07/11

      For me, mainstream journalism has lost its integrity.  Until it claws that back, it is lost and perhaps a code would help that. Who knows?

      Until journalists return to looking at fact and fact alone and actually ask the questions requried, hold their subject to that answer and stop worrying about being “nasty” (yes you Mal Farr), or ideology - it will remain inane blabber of pointless direction.

      The 24 hour news cycle and sensational demands of the general public feed off each other so it is hard to see where blame really lies. Who the F* cares who’s fault it is though, it is headed down - and fast.

      Politicians are not celebrities and they should be forced to ask any question presented to them that relates to their position. Clearly and concisely I might add too. We have lives to lead - we don’t have fifteen minutes to listen to a response. I’m usually asleep before they even get to the ansering bit.

      Danielle Isdale on Channel 10 is the best television journalist in my opinion.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      03:05pm | 28/07/11

      It would also be nice if they stated interviewing newsmakers rather than each other - its so bloody self-indulgent. Q: So Channel 9 reporter what do you think about the budget? A: Who cares? Did you notice how many viewers just changed channel?

    • Q says:

      09:38am | 28/07/11

      Journalism is now more “my opinion” than actual factual news.

    • Journalism is Dead says:

      11:12am | 28/07/11

      In an interview yesterday, Ms Nixon cited a News Ltd campaign against her and Mr Overland, who quit on June 16 after controversy relating to misleading crime figures, as an example of how the organisation operated against people who did not bend to its wishes.
      No ethics, political bias
      Long live the Sun King.

    • Michael says:

      11:33am | 28/07/11

      Journalist need to remember, they are messengers, or heralds, little more.

      News in general went into decline when the people delivering the news forgot that the point of it all was the news itself, not themselves or their overrated opinion of their political acumen.

      Laurie Oakes is a good example, Mal Farr another.

      I would like to be able to hear Richard Carlton’s views of things since 2007

      Watch the female from the 7pm project barely contain her contempt at the political news she delivers, eyes rolling and comments under her breath as she hands over to Charlie.

    • Steve says:

      11:50am | 28/07/11

      Ban the byline!  Gets the journalist’s ego out of the way.

    • ibast says:

      11:51am | 28/07/11

      “Is it time for Australian media powers to draw up a code of conduct to deal with spin doctor demands?”.

      Nope it’s time the government stepped in and brought in much tougher media ownership laws.  Get a few more alternative views out there and we’ll see a rise in journalistic standards.

    • Not the news says:

      11:59am | 28/07/11

      Having worked for a major newspaper I can tell you exactly what the editors thought of the news.  “The news is simply a collection of words we put together in order to sell advertising space.”  Says it all really.

    • Lesley Laurel says:

      12:23pm | 28/07/11

      In television cricket commentary, Richie Benaud and Shane Warne provide plenty of spin.

    • MarkS says:

      12:54pm | 28/07/11

      Bah humbug

      The pollies etc need the media, you have the power. But as you are known to misuse it everybody who deals with you is carefull.

      Grow up, do your job, without fear or favour. Which will happen sometime shortly after the Carbon Tax saves the planet.

    • Bilby says:

      12:59pm | 28/07/11

      Is this an optical illusion? I keep trying to read the article but all I see is a chick in *tiny* little shorts. It’s a magic eye thing right? I squint and blur my eyes and I’ll be able to read it? Never was any good at those things.

    • Wilms J Craig says:

      01:47pm | 28/07/11

      Moral of this story is:
      Don’t waste time interviewing these puffed up, self-important nobodies: Celebrities.

    • stephen says:

      05:12pm | 28/07/11

      Yeah but you could have been a bit critical of this government’s insistence on a ‘privacy’ bill.
      Bad mistake on Julia’s part, and if she takes Kevin’s R’s advice and goes to the political centre the first boundary she should kick is Bob Brown and his desperadoes right outta the boundary line.
      By the way, why put up Dave Letterman’s pic. : he’s the last TV host who’d play ball with PC.

    • deb says:

      06:26am | 29/07/11

      I rarely buy a newspaper anymore too many ads and the net is so much easier to read. Only problem is i cant line the bird cage without the old newspaper.My lorriket has to have something to crap on!

    • Chris_D says:

      07:49am | 29/07/11

      I saw the photo, liked it and then read the article.

      The photo is more interesting than the article.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Last year, thousands of Azerbaijanis spontaneously took to the streets of Baku shouting and chanting.…

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Last month, Katy McCaffrey boarded the Disney Wonder cruiseliner. At some point during the trip, a sneaky…

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

ClubsNSW is set to introduce a fresh new effort to combat schoolyard intimidation, insisting on a principal’s…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter