There’s a simple reason why some three million Australians watched the Masterchef final last night - instead of making heroes out of people you would do anything to avoid, it celebrated people you’d be happy to have as friends, or proud to have as part of your family.

On paper it was merely the latest phase in the reality television format, another game-based cooking program, similar in theory to so many others which now infect the Lifestyle Food channel, not even an original idea but the re-heated antipodean version of the British program of the same name.

As such, many Australians were slow to respond to the program, assuming it was formulaic fluff, cooked up by the marketing people in a cynical bid for ratings and targeted advertising.

It not only ended up being an antidote for cynicism, it quickly shattered whatever formula it had inherited from the UK with a refreshingly representative mix of contestants, a civil and encouraging panel of judges, not to mention some very classy guest chefs appearing throughout the show.

Apart from being fun, polite and informative, it also reflected the multicultural face of modern Australia - as Yvette Andrews wrote on The Punch last week, what other TV show has devoted an entire episode to the family moussaka recipe of a Greek-Australian judge, or culminated in a final between an Adelaide artist with a Malaysian-Chinese background and a suburban mum from the NSW Central Coast?

Julie’s victory last night inspired some toffy-nosed criticism, chiefly via Twitter, of her cooking technique as being plebby and every-day, with conspiracy theorists her victory had been rigged because her cookbook (with a family-based scrapbook format) would sell   well, and because as an “ordinary” Mum she’d make the best public face for the show’s supermarket sponsors.

Such talk ignores what happened last night - Poh, by her own admission, had a brain fade and bungled two parts of her dessert by not following the recipe, while Julie showed amazing and uncharacteristic calm when, having made a mess of the sorbet, she made it again and nailed it with seconds to spare. In addition, when the finalists were presented with a chicken as their main ingredient for the food invention category, Poh’s choice of Hainanese Chicken Rice did seem to lack adventure, given that it’s the Malaysian equivalent of a roast chook in the everyday stakes. In contrast, Julie’s stuffed breast and ballotine ensemble went way beyond the everyday, and far behind the talents she possessed when she debuted on the program.

The snobbish or conspiratorial nonsense on the sidelines over Julie’s victory is easily eclipsed by the dominant sense of joy and gratitude that such a genuine feel-good show went to air. It had none of the contrived schmaltz of other programs in this “family” category. It involved a group of people who were so genuinely nice that, as the finals heated up, even the contestants seemed just as interested in each other’s well-being as their own chances of victory.

We watched it at home last night, having structured our last seven days around being plonked down with the kids in front of the telly bang-on time every night, and at the end we were trying to think of an Australian television program we had ever enjoyed so much.

The domestically-produced TV programs which have been hailed as classics have all tended to involve people being shot or blown up - Phoenix, Janus, Blue Murder, latterly Underbelly - while the juggernaut programs of reality TV, such as the early seasons of Big Brother or Idol, have often been banal or cruel.

If the measure is simply watchability, good values and unadorned fun, Masterchef may have set a new benchmark.

Last word can go to viewer James Dellow (@chieftech) of Wollongong who said on twitter last night: the downside of this whole #masterchef thing is that my kids now want to eat at ARIA Restaurant.

78 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Madison says:

      07:20am | 20/07/09

      For Poh, deciding to serve up the Asian equivalent of Mcdonalds in round 2 was terrible mistake. Given also that the judges clearly stressed they wanted to see them use the entire core ingredient which was the WHOLE chicken, what does Poh do? She goes and uses just the legs. The 3rd round was complete disaster for Poh. You would think Poh, with all her dessert skills would know that the first thing about tempering chocolate would be not to heat it over a direct heat. The mistake was so amateurish it almost looked staged. Then she goes and puts it in the fridge having no regard for the specific instructions of the accomplished chef who created the very dish she was attempting. In the end, Julie won based on her performance on the night which was far superior. That said, Poh is undoubtedly more versatile in her cooking ability, and a better chef overall. If only her laugh was less annoying.

    • Matt says:

      07:43am | 20/07/09

      Great post Penbo. Amazingly, it was compelling viewing that didn’t rely on the standard reality TV format and instead was positive and encouraging. Good luck to all of the contestants.

      Julie really deserved her win but I hope that in following its success the producers don’t seek to lock in clones of the same characters next series or down the track trace the path of evolution that saw Burke’s Backyard spin off into the formulaic Backyard Blitz into the cloyingly sentimental Random Acts of Kindness…

    • Jan says:

      08:02am | 20/07/09

      Master Chef is the first reality show that I have watched right through.
      No sex, no swearing, no back stabbing, no Chef yelling at cooks telling them they are morons, no judges screaming in delight as someone
      does a back flip on the dance floor.  At last we are back to a show that the whole family can watch together, and enjoy.  I have checked out the receipes on line and made some of them.  My family does like an occasional special meal, but it is the good wholesome meals that they enjoy best.  Don’t know where you live, but my supermarket does not stock 100 year old eggs and squid juice,
      Congratulations to Julie and I hope that the producers continue with this type of format with the second series.

    • Lexi says:

      08:23am | 20/07/09

      Julie deserved to win - she took the most risks to deliver the biggest bang in Round 2 (and showed all her newly-acquired skills in doing so - Poh showed what she could’ve cooked before she entered the competition); Julie religiously and studiously followed the recipe in Round 3 with great success (Poh thought she knew better). 

      Aside from that, of all the contestants, Julie grew the most as a cook and as a person from beginning to end.  She survived every pressure test and was never eliminated.  She was also the person who was fair, friendly and just so positive towards everyone else. She learnt how to conquer her own fears and frustrations - giving her the drive to do what she did last night.
      Yay Julie!

    • Peter says:

      08:41am | 20/07/09

      Perhaps the producers of ‘reality’ TV will now realise that most Australians prefer roast turkey to ‘turkey slaps’.

    • Fred says:

      08:59am | 20/07/09

      I’ve watched two episodes (including last nights), I thought it was tacky. I much prefer Iron Chef.

    • Jethro Hayseed says:

      09:24am | 20/07/09

      Cant stand it. Screaming and bellowing from the cats on the balcony. Continous beating of war drums. Adolescent + corny musical score. Asinine food commentary from pompous boring judges.  Ordinary cooking. A stram of bellicose advertising.  Just another cheap TV stunt. Whats next?  Groom that ordinary dog into a show pony?  Sweep that verandah into a courtyard pazza? Give me a break.

    • Nathan says:

      09:58am | 20/07/09

      Can someone tell the Daily Telecrap that Poh didn’t win. Where did they get the quotes from if it was an ‘editorial oversite’ on the website. Sounds like a bunch of amateurs who should be sacked.

    • Tim says:

      10:05am | 20/07/09

      I am ‘one of those’ who watch UK Masterchef and have not watched our version, except for the first show and last nights. I see nothing changed. It was an overdramatised popularity contest of a show which is totally unrealistic in terms of preparing these amateur chefs for the professional kitchen. Just how many times where the contestants thrown into a ‘real’ kitchen and made to survive? On the UK version it is just about every other round. These people last night were given 2 1/2 hours to do a desert in the final round of the competition! Do you get that long in a professional kitchen? Where were the Michelin star chefs? - not some Oprah Winfrey-come-TV show cooks. A very weak version of a great classic show. Shame on you Channel Ten.

    • Lucy says:

      10:19am | 20/07/09

      TIm if you had watched more than 2 episodes you would know that they were thrown into professional kitchens all over Sydney as well as HK very regularly.

      As for Channel Ten, I think the ratings speak for themselves.

    • P says:

      10:35am | 20/07/09

      Its over thanksGod, i have watched the show from beginiing and i bet 10 buks with my son that Julie will win , [AND SHE DID]  WHAY??Because she is a typical aussie mum with 3 kids a good home cook but not a chef,  crying if something goes wrong, sweating over the dishes, thats what the avarege aussie likes. Chris was a bit arrogant but his ideas were excellent, Justine put a bit of french flavours in her dishes, again aussies do not like frogs,, Sam and Andre tryed italian dishes , again they did not like it , , finaly Poh , a artistic, inovative cook, but she can not be a AUSTRALIAN MASTER CHEF she is Malaysian -chinese origin been in the country since she was 9 years old but still a New australian, no hope for her She can not be AUSTRALIAN MASTERCHEF [ Do not forget the aussie pride] It would be a disaster to have a chinese for aussie masterchef Terevor and Lucas show lots of talent also, again they are not Family mum with 3 kids iT HAD TO BE JULIE. THIS SHOW SHOULD BECALLED the best home cook in oz, then you can give the title to julie. She can cook lambchops and roast chiken red rooster style.
      It was a rigged show from the begining , it was my first and last masterchef show , ch.10 you lost me.

    • Sully says:

      11:01am | 20/07/09

      This has set the benchmark for the feel-good reality genre. A great piece of production from Fremantle and Ten.

      The numbers really do all the talking. Shame that the Tele website tried to pre-empt the result and got it very wrong. Not a great advert for the journalistic integrity / accuracy of traditional media.

    • Lurch says:

      11:01am | 20/07/09

      @ P : jeez, bit of a racist rant there, what do you mean because Poh is of Malay origin she cannot be ” a AUSTRALIAN MASTER CHEF” ? Grow up and get in the real world, half of Australia is made up of immigrants who have bought their cusine here and enriched our lives ............ Julie won on her merits and the those who didn’t get through lost on theirs it’s as simple as that.

    • RC says:

      11:11am | 20/07/09

      Julie deserved to win - 100%. Julie never was eliminated. Poh should never have been in the top20. Poh was given ample opportunity to show what she was capable of and never got there. Even in the auditions, the judges gave her a second chance. Why? Then she was eliminated and she was given a second chance.

    • RKW says:

      11:29am | 20/07/09

      I loved Masterchef and watched it from beginning to end despite my loathing of the reality TV genre. That says it all for me. Julie deserved her win last night and proved to the judges that she could take her excellent home cooking to the next level. All Poh did last night was prove that she really hadn’t learned anything - least of all how to follow a recepie. She will do a fantastic job with Curtis making other chef’s creations pretty on the plate.

      And don’t we ALL now want to eat at Aria restaurant?

    • stephen says:

      11:33am | 20/07/09

      Think about it : watching tv ..about.. a… cook..rushing.. from.. one.. stinking.. pot.. to.. the.. next..

      Go outside and learn a ball-game.

    • Jacinta says:

      11:37am | 20/07/09

      As a Chef and a foodie i think as Ben O’Donohue put it well, The winner here is Food!  As a mum i found the fact that my two children were so interested every night in watching food-based show i was rapt.  Initially i found Julie chaotic & disorganised, but last night we all cried joyful tears with her as she won and shared the win with her family & castmates.  Well done to the creators of this series, the contestants, the judges and to the guests!!

    • Jonathan says:

      11:41am | 20/07/09

      Everyone knows that Julie shouldn’t have been there after last week.  Judged a success on dishes she didn’t even plate up…  Epic fail on the part of the judges, Donna Hay and the producers.  They’d decided that Julie’s cookbook would sell the most, so she was going through.
      Regardless, Julie did better than Poh last night.  But I’d still go to Chris’s restaurant over any of the other contestants, and I won’t be buying Julie’s cookbook.

    • Alan Partridge says:

      12:00pm | 20/07/09

      It was about the interests of media placement, further promotion of channel 10 as ‘the cool lifestyle’ option and of course RANDOM HOUSE. The winner was always going to be the one that best appealed to the audience demographic of future spin-off sales. Wake up. Yes better than UK, but hardly supports your gushing review.

    • Ted Carrivick says:

      12:01pm | 20/07/09

      Viewing figures speak for themselves, so the show has to be a success, they can all cook better than I can so no complaints from me except that once again Western Astralia dipped out on the “live” transmission thing due to time difference, the winners name was posted on the web long before the show had finished last night, I found out by accident because I was checking the latest storm warning, too bad if I was a real fanatic and was waiting on the surprise element on the winner being shown live on T.V.
      For Julie good on her, for the whingers, shut up unless you can do better and go and join Rick ponting in the whingers corner.

    • Jo says:

      12:04pm | 20/07/09

      Poh’s stellar performance in the challenges leading up to the finale - she beat the 5 other cooks in 2 out of the 3 challanges of the final week, for example - easily trumps Julie’s efforts in the finale last night. She won simply because Poh was admittedly not her usual best. My guess would be that the outpouring of support for Julie’s win is coming mostly from the million or so new or non-regular viewers of the show who cannot possibly fathom what a joke it is that Julie has won. Please, people, watch the finals week of masterchef again and please tell me how on earth Julie was allowed through over the talents of Justine, Chris and Poh. Seriously, what an embarrassment and an insult for the other contestants.

    • T says:

      12:04pm | 20/07/09

      guess what? I missed it, I was cooking at the time.

    • Sean says:

      12:16pm | 20/07/09

      Thanks God MasterChef has finished.. Unfortunately it seems destined to return to our screens :(

      Something is seriously wrong with our culture if 3.7 million people tune in on a Sunday night to watch this emotional schmultz..

    • W says:

      12:23pm | 20/07/09

      Dancing on TV: Audience participation and judgement = Sight.
      Singing on TV: Audience participation and judgement = Hearing.
      Cooking: Can’t participate - Taste.

      Flat as a pancake.

    • Vi says:

      12:31pm | 20/07/09

      Poh was in the final two because she’s a great sacrificial lamb. There’s no way Julie should ever win in a fair contest so they put her up against someone that had been given two chances at the auditions, had been eliminated and then re-instated. How someone can fail to complete dishes, burn dishes and generally stuff up consistently is deemed to be the “best” points to a rather sad state of affairs. Worse is that the judges have comprised themselves to the altar of media whoredom.

    • Madison says:

      12:37pm | 20/07/09

      There are always going to be the haters out there.

      Fact is the finale of Masterchef set a new record for viewership.

      If you didn’t like it then maybe it’s you, not us. I think our culture is just fine Sean.

    • Charles says:

      12:47pm | 20/07/09

      Interesting format.  The exceptional contestants (those that won a celebrity challenge)  ‘exited’ early to understudy elsewhere, while the rest ‘understudied’ (studied) the judges and became aware of what was required to win.

      As a contest, the rules were a moving ‘feast’.  As a show, it has proven to be spectacularly successful.  Congrats to 10 and the amateur chefs - it would be interesting to follow-up in 6 months and see where they and their dreams have landed.

    • mastercomment says:

      12:56pm | 20/07/09

      “toffy-nosed criticism”—you’re missing the point. just because julie did well last night doesn’t mean she deserved to be there. she totally bombed in the malaysian challenge (raw fish) and failed miserably in the pie challenge, yet they let her through. and ran out of time on the donna hay episode. THAT is why most ppl are feeling ripped off now she’s won. toffy-nosed criticism doesn’t come into it.

    • Tim says:

      01:02pm | 20/07/09

      Lucy, I’m reliably informed that you could count the number of times they went into professional kitchens on 1 hand (2 max) - Masterchef UK - every night contestants are hauled into a pro kitchen. Anyhow, like people have alluded to, the show seems more about drama, popularity and helping Curtis Stone sell more books (even if they are at the least the annoying parts on the periphery) than aspiring to a showcase a decent plate of food night in, night out. Why do we need drama in a cooking show? I can understand it BB but are peoples lives really that dull?

    • nigel says:

      01:06pm | 20/07/09

      Australia’s first Masterchef. A $100,000 prize. Julie: “That’s an onion isn’t it?” Yikes. A truly bogan moment. And I’m no great cook but when our family heard it was Beef Bourguignon for the taste test we wrote down 15 ingredients before getting one wrong. Geez, you could see there were carrots in the pot from your living room! Great telly though. We’ll be watching again. But think they need to get rid of the music and chopping block sound effect for Series 2. Was getting a bit Howdy-Doody towards the end.

    • Smudge says:

      01:13pm | 20/07/09

      Methinks there’s a lot of you out there who need to GET A LIFE !!!

    • Clint says:

      01:29pm | 20/07/09

      Conspiracy theorists - please get a grip. Julie has been a standout (along with Chris and Justine) since the second week. The “Pohlercoaster” - thanks Matt - was entertaining and equally brilliant and diabolical. Great show, great entertainment, and thanks to Masterchef I have now added twice baked souflle to my limited kitchen repertoire.

    • Ben says:

      01:35pm | 20/07/09

      No.

    • sharon says:

      01:40pm | 20/07/09

      A shocking show….I cannot get into this kind of crap TV.  I could cook my own creation in the time it takes them to judge someone, who could be bothered, you can’t smell it and you can’t taste it…what’s the point.

    • Razor says:

      01:56pm | 20/07/09

      Julie won the competition but I think Chris and Justine are the most likely to continue on the great success on the back of this.

    • Paula says:

      01:56pm | 20/07/09

      People are sick of being served up violence, sex and foul language,  It makes a refreshing change for a family show where you might actually learn something.  Just one plea.  Hope we are not bombarded by the other stations with a similar format.  Show some originality.

    • AM says:

      02:02pm | 20/07/09

      I loved MasterChef and I was delighted with the result and I appreciate David Penberthy’s perspective because it seems to reflect a large proportion of those 3.75 million viewers – and me!
      Whoever it was at Channel 10 that recognised that the viewing public had so far be starved (unintentionally apt pun!) of anything remotely approaching quality in reality tv should be instantly promoted to CEO. And whoever it was who selected Gary, George and the wondrous Matt, three such affirming, encouraging, knowledgeable gents, should surely be awarded an Order of Australia for services to television and the wellbeing of the entire country. (And of course Gary, George and Matt need to be knighted.)
      Reality tv has finally delivered something that normal, socially functional and interested people actually want to embrace. And about bloody time!!!

    • Stuart says:

      02:05pm | 20/07/09

      I don’t feel sad that I do not have a Donna Hay cookbook in my collection after the other night. Final should have been Poh and Chris, now that would have been interesting!

    • Henry says:

      02:06pm | 20/07/09

      No you’re wrong here Penbo. It’s not the greatest show ever, the second season will show that when the ratings drop. And Julie was hopeless and did not deserve to win. She was consistently in the bottom three and didn’t even complete tasks on more than one occasion.

    • Tuggernuts says:

      02:08pm | 20/07/09

      Gee there are some negative people out there.  If you don’t have anything nice to say, shut up.  Maybe try getting off the couch and find something better to do if Master Chef is so hard for YOU to watch.

    • Lexi says:

      02:48pm | 20/07/09

      @Jo - I watched every episode.  I was addicted.  I blogged on the forum and set our dinner six nights per week by Masterchef.

      I had a few faves - Julie, Justine, Tom, Trevor.  Had a few would I didn’t like from the get go - Sam, Kate.  Some I grew to dislike - Andre, Sandra, Chris…. Whether I liked or loathed depended on how people behaved, whether they b!tched or wished ill towards others.  Whether they were arrogant or grateful for the tuition and help they received.  Whether they were bitter and spoke out after they left the show.

      It also depended on how they cooked.  Poh is innovative, at times.  Poh can be a great cook, at times.  Poh can definitely plate up well.  Julie learnt how to avoid falling to pieces under pressure (Poh didn’t - it’s how she got eliminated first time, and how she lost the final round), Julie developed a more sophisticated style, she learnt so much technique and finesse.  She was always honourable.  Always dedicated.  Always supportive of others.  People can say they won’t buy her cook book, but I will.  Probably one for me, one for my mum, one for my mother in law.  If I can get my hands on a copy - I bet they sell out quickly.  Hope they’re out in time for Christmas!

    • Lucy says:

      03:02pm | 20/07/09

      Aah Tim, your faith in your ‘reliable’ informant is sadly misplaced.

      Off the top of my head I can remember contestants getting experience through the course of the show in professional kitchens including Aria, Manu, Quay, Flying Fish, numerous restaurants at Wooloomooloo wharf, The Ivy, Catalinas…the list goes on.

      Sure the format is different to Masterchef UK BUT the Australian version has had a far greater impact on people of all ages getting interested in food and cooking.

    • Blake says:

      03:06pm | 20/07/09

      I love Masterchef, But i do not think it is right to say it is the best ever australian tv show. How can that be said, when great aussie shows like Blue Heelers, All Saints and ESPECIALLY Prisoner have been around!

    • Johan says:

      03:09pm | 20/07/09

      Good clean family entertainment, my wife (fabulous cook) was crying at the end

      I do find the overly-dramatised format wears thin, but good TV all the same. I think my wife woulda iced them though

    • Arianne says:

      03:13pm | 20/07/09

      LOL!
      MasterSh**
      Lets all cry a bit and tell a sod story about your children,
      OH WOW! what’s that? I get 100k too

      Fan-freakin-tastic.

    • Chef Al says:

      03:18pm | 20/07/09

      Chicken rice is not as easy it looks. trust me, I know, I live in Malaysia for 17 years and to this day I still can’t get it right.  The chicken has to be cooked at the right temperature and that’s the single most important thing to mess up on and there goes the tenderness and flavour.

      chicken ballentine, phuff, I’ve done that many times, it’s fool proof.

    • Philip Brookes says:

      03:22pm | 20/07/09

      Brilliant!  I now have an interest in cooking.  I agree with all the positive comments.  The gormless cynics can stew in their negativity and get stuffed.

    • LD says:

      03:25pm | 20/07/09

      What an absurd article.  Masterchef has been on Foxtel for years, in the correct format, whereby winners are selected for cooking ability.  This series was more a rip off of the American show Top Chef, also on Foxtel.  It shows how lackluster Australian TV is that you suggest an unoriginal rip off is our best ever show.  The British Masterchef and American Top Chef are far better shows.

    • Adam says:

      03:50pm | 20/07/09

      Like most reality shows, the first season is likely to be the best - because contestants go on for the right reasons, not to be famous. Now that it’s been such a big hit,  I predict that in the coming seasons more and more people will go on looking for fame, unconcerned with the cooking bit.

    • Henrietta says:

      04:00pm | 20/07/09

      This show has been so refreshing! Hy husband and I (who would not normally watch reality TV) have had half an eye on the show throughout the series, and were sitting on the couch last night cheering for Julie!

      It has been so nice to see a TV show that treats people as human beings…without the swearing, sex and violence that we see on TV. To have a wholesome TV show showcasing a true cross-section of society has been fantastic!

    • Anna says:

      04:01pm | 20/07/09

      Julie is a real person, a warm and gentle mum. I would love to eat from her hands one day & definitely will buy her cook book. The best cook won. Poh will grow in time and will have her future. Had a bit of a problem with the “Turkey” looking big judge…but gluttony comes with it sometimes…

    • S says:

      04:16pm | 20/07/09

      Forty Years ago today we huddled around our black and white television sets to marvel at Armstrong and Aldrin on the Moon. Fast forward to 2010 and the nation is spellbound by a game show cook off. Is this the end of civilization as we know it?

    • iansand says:

      04:18pm | 20/07/09

      I may have missed it, but did any challenge involve getting 6 different main courses to a table at the same time?  Budgetting?  Purchasing?  Kitchen organisation?  Front of house stuff?  A cook is not a chef.

      If Julie does start a restaurant I give it 3 months if she does not have a lot of backup.

    • Looking to leave Oz says:

      04:31pm | 20/07/09

      Master Chef and shows alike are the reason the average IQ of Australia’s public is reducing. 3.7 million fools.

      Herd of irrational moron’s with voting rights. No wonder our country is up the shitter.

    • Smart people everywhere says:

      04:42pm | 20/07/09

      Australia’s best TV show of all time? Is that supposed to a joke?

    • DJG says:

      05:23pm | 20/07/09

      Best reality show ever. Clearly Penbo is too young to have watched Sylvania Waters. Now that was entertaining.

    • Bethy says:

      05:26pm | 20/07/09

      I don’t think people begrudge Julie personally as she seemed a really lovely honest contestant and the strength of this program was that it was supportive and not nasty but she was not the best chef in the competition.

      The controversy isn’t that Julie won last night it’s that she didn’t deserve to be there in the first place having consistently underperformed.  Which is ok if this show wasn’t billed to be finding someone suitable to be working in professional kitchens, as she clearly isn’t fit for it.  They should position it as they do So You Think You Can Dance and call it Australia’s Favourite Chef and then there wouldn’t have been this issue arising now but to sell it as finding the best chef in the competition was misguided.  She was selected because she appealed to the demographic they were chasing and will sell books and magazine columns etc , let’s hope next year they make some changes

    • Lucy says:

      05:28pm | 20/07/09

      Yes iansand, there were NUMEROUS challenges that involved all those aspects.

      I love it when people who haven’t got their basic facts about the show right, come on here to criticise the show when its obvious they’ve hardly watched it.

    • Shane says:

      07:02pm | 20/07/09

      No Master Chef is not the greatest show of all time, it was shit and no better than any other reality crap.
      I don’t give a toss if it was rigged or not. The record ratings only show there are plenty of morons willing to watch reality television.

    • iansand says:

      07:15pm | 20/07/09

      Lucy @ 5:28 Do you understand the concept of “a question”?

    • Chris says:

      07:31pm | 20/07/09

      It was slick and clever. As noted in the article, the production crew was fantastic, and (IMO) were the real “winners”. Plus, the show featured enough ethnics, mums, dads, babes, geeks, fatties and eccentrics to appeal to most people in the community. Celebrity MC will be a let-down and a cheap money grab after this.

    • Gordon says:

      11:20pm | 20/07/09

      It was a great show with much potential but failed miserably in the last week with blatant favouritism shown for the ‘chosen’ winner. Julie didn’t deserve her spot there, she didn’t finish one dish on the Thursday night episode and served up bland food. The whole challenge was for plating dishes that were meant to be exciting and front cover material, none of Julie’s dishes even came close to it yet the judges completely disregard this criteria when it came to judging her dishes. Donna Hay even made excuses for her so she could get through. The whole contest was a manipulated scam on the Australian viewing public to produce a winner best suited for Womans Weekly & Family Circle covers. I see people saying it’s just ‘tall poppy’ syndrome, it’s more about letting the other contestants having a fair go instead of giving someone suspect help.

    • Mr Subramanian says:

      01:41am | 21/07/09

      Excellent point about the production values - it’s one of the things that continues to distinguish the original Survivor from the multitude of its progeny. We haven’t followed Masterchef very closely at all, but have enjoyed the episodes we did watch and tuned in for the final anyway. And quite enjoyed it.

      I see all the “toffy nosed critics” Penbo mentioned have come out of the woodwork with a vengeance to post their rants on here. Why don’t you join “Looking to leave Oz” @ 4:38? The rest of us in “normal” Australia will be more than happy to buy you a plane ticket outta here, instead of having to listen to your constant carping negativity in pulling things down rather than trying to build them up.

    • Chris Kneller says:

      04:41am | 21/07/09

      Whilst I was happy with the show and agree with all the comments made about why it was such a success, was Julie not handed a big adavatage when told her sorbet was not up to scratch ?. I doubt she would have made the decision to have another go had she not been told it was not good enough. Its a bit like being able to take the penalty again because the first kick was way off the mark.

    • john says:

      07:51am | 21/07/09

      A real live adventure show.  Real people, doing what they love best, pleasing others through food.  No stage play, no bad language, no half naked women to sell the show and no viewer judging, just everyday people looking to learn through experience.  This is a true reality show and it captured many families.  Far more pleasing to watch people battle it out in the kitchen rather than watching dopes pushing and fighting on the football field.  Ball games, they are a dime a dozen.

    • Bernard King says:

      08:36am | 21/07/09

      “Australia’s best TV show of all time?”  Let’s hope not.

    • Tim says:

      10:06am | 21/07/09

      Well if they did go into as many professional kitchens through the course of the series as you say Lucy, then it certainly didn’t show in the final. And just how long did they spend in those professional kitchens - 1 hour, 2 hours? Try spending 17 hours in their like the finalists of other Masterchef versions do. And I don’t think it will ever be forgotten that the winner still could barely tell the difference between a shallot and an onion, and some of the main ingredients in a beef burgundy - I’m no chef by a long shot but how could you forget the basics of tomatoes, oil etc…Masterchef…I don’t think so.

    • Joe says:

      10:08am | 21/07/09

      OMG a cooking program and you ask is it the best Australian T.V show of all time. That really must be a poor reflection on every other program ever produced on these shores. Australia must surely be a cultural vacuum if this is the best it can come up with. What amazes me is Australians don’t see this, they appear to have no appetite for knowledge, variety, or entertainment risk.

    • Toby says:

      10:21am | 21/07/09

      “....cooked up by the marketing people in a cynical bid for ratings and targeted advertising.”

      Fortunately for me I was out on Sunday night so had the luxury of fast forwarding the adverts using IQ. The program was 2 hours long, my guess is that at least a quarter of this was dedicated to ads telling us how much better value one supermarket is that the other, or how it’s sensible to buy a new car right now (and lose 1/3 of the price as soon as I drive it off the forecourt!?!?) because the manufacturer is happy to shave some margin… I understand advertising and the need for brand recall, but this surely I can’t be the only one who has vowed to never buy products due to the spam I receive through the television. Please, give me a break from ad breaks, I don’t need 18 cups of tea during a two hour program.

    • Theo says:

      11:11am | 21/07/09

      Another TV show about the best and most talented contestant only this time was about cooking. Starts with to many expectations and finished like all the other shows. The winner?????? Mediocre and stressed .Unfortunately the best cook was at the balcony applauding in demand of the producer . Is not about skills, is about what captivate the viewers.

    • FILL says:

      12:56pm | 21/07/09

      As a Ten Network shareholder I’m glad it’s done well. But “Australia’s best TV show of all time?” - no way. The reality TV pause-for-the-next-statement torture was, as always with these shows, too much for me. To find the best look at Blue Murder, Janus/Phoenix and The Dismissal just to name a couple of starters.

    • stuart says:

      02:38pm | 21/07/09

      The problem is that the networks will run the same formula over, and over, and over, and over, and over again ad naseum :-(

      At least SBS seems to have avoided the worst of it.

    • Anayah says:

      04:34pm | 21/07/09

      One of THE best things to come out of Master Chef is that people are being re-connected with food. No longer seen as something to merely taste good and fill us up regardless of its nutritional value, food Master Chef style, is treat (oh, I just couldn’t help the pun) from start to finish!

    • Monty says:

      04:25pm | 22/07/09

      Pembo -last time I looked Hainan was still part of China. Hainanese means coming from Hainan not Malaysia (which would more likely by NanHai (as in the sea). Still as you say it is not held in the same esteem by foreigners as it is to Chinese.
      I would have liked them to have gone to mainland China or Thailand rather than Hong Kong. Then they would have learned a lot more.
      Now all we need to see is the Chinese version of Iron chef.

    • Dianne says:

      03:51am | 07/11/09

      I am watching this program here in NZ at the moment. I just can’t believe the lady (Julie Goodwin) was considered the best. Mastechef Australia, good lord I haven’t seen a decent dish from her. Clumsy sweaty and disorganised. The food she was putting forward, we have every night of the week. Boring.Did you see what she did to the Leg of Lamb. OMG unbelievable. Bad format, and quite frankly a rigged show. The best cooks were side stepped. I would of chosen Chris and Justine for the finals. They were the two that came through with honours. Pfffff to the rest. Hopeless.

    • Bruce says:

      08:47pm | 22/01/10

      More Americanised doffing of the hat to Generation Y reality rubbish with too many ‘whoas’ and ‘yays’ and dumb people jumping up and clapping themselves. Australia seems to take British reality shows and make them American. The British version is far superior, and as for the line in this piece: “it quickly shattered whatever formula it had inherited from the UK with a refreshingly representative mix of contestants”, Oh I suppose the UK version was full of snobs? Oh what a stereotypical verdict on anything British: wrong. The original UK version is polite, intelliegent, and covers a complete cross-section of British society, which was majorly multi-cultural when Australia was still practising its 1970s backwater apatheid, and doesn’t pander to the all-American / Australian generation Y market. Far from it. And when is Australia actually going to come up with an original idea for any show, never mind reality?

    • Kyle says:

      07:52pm | 14/09/10

      Why is the headline “Best Australian Show Of All Time”? Sure this show attracts alot of viewers - but in answer to the headline - I think shows like “Neighbours”, “Home And Away”, “A Country Practice” and “Play School” are more likely to be Australia’s best shows of all time…

    • Jani says:

      06:11am | 23/05/12

      One word sums up Australian TV, BORING. Create a show like Korea’s “running man” or “infinity challenge” in Australia and I gurantee it will be the most watched show in Australia. Please not another singing, cooking, dancing or home improvement reality show. I’m pretty sure Australian TV producers have the potential to be alot more creative than that.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Greece makes the final and Ireland gets in on a golden ticket. How awkward and embarrassing. Love it. #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Every single #eurovision band is roxette #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

The weird thing about #eurovision is you've got this massive collection of dorks in a room and no one is wearing Spock ears #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Europe has the large hadron collider which is light years ahead of its time and #eurovision, where the eighties never die

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Eurovision can’t drown out the human rights abuses

Last year, thousands of Azerbaijanis spontaneously took to the streets of Baku shouting and chanting.…

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Revenge. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than this

Last month, Katy McCaffrey boarded the Disney Wonder cruiseliner. At some point during the trip, a sneaky…

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

Friday dilemma: can school bullies grow out of it?

ClubsNSW is set to introduce a fresh new effort to combat schoolyard intimidation, insisting on a principal’s…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter