Former Prime Minister, Paul Keating, has long been a champion of better architecture and planning. Most recently, he caused a stir by describing our national capital as “a great mistake”.

LIke Light's vision for Adelaide, good design stands the test of time.

Keating also lamented the bulldozing of much of Melbourne’s heritage in the 1970s, but even had a shot at some of the Victorian buildings that remained.

“I used to call it Whorehouse Rococo and Bordello Baroque”, he said. And he teased Australia’s “heritage mafia” for making a crust out of pretending that old buildings are of significance.

“Things that were never good in the first place, by sheer dint of age, become important,” he said.

A few years back, Keating gave a speech to a city development conference in Sydney.

There he took aim at “modernism”, and described ‘McMansions’ as “an eczema on the Australian landscape”.

But behind the colourful barbs, Keating talked thoughtfully about the importance of good design.

“Design does nourish the soul,’’ he said.

“Our brains are built to comprehend shape and form and are pleased by harmony.

“The eye sees everything. When we walk into a room, we know instantly whether we are pleased by the ambience, even though we cannot instantly articulate why this is the case.

”Similarly, in the built environment, especially in the urban landscape, we know in a heartbeat whether a new construction is a net addition or subtraction from our own interpretive world.

”The old cityscapes have mostly felt good for us because of their human scale, their material use, their architectural exclamation marks and their places for people.

“We regard them as soul-ful, not soul-less, ….”

In my own State, planning and design have long occupied a place of importance.

Surveyor Colonel William Light’s 1830s plan for Adelaide has stood the test of time.

The design of central Adelaide and its parklands, an enduring ‘City in a Park’, is not only revered at home, but admired abroad.

Planning and architecture students around the world are taught about the design principles of 19th Century Adelaide.

But neither Light, nor our State’s pioneers who began arriving in 1836, could have envisioned 21st Century Adelaide and a 20th Century invention - the motor car.

That’s why I will soon release a 30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide.

This is a blueprint that will shape our metropolitan area and its future.

It will enhance its vibrancy, preserve its liveability, and enshrine its sustainability.

The Plan, which follows a huge consultation effort, will emphasise the value we place on Adelaide’s heritage and unique character, and help underpin the highest quality in urban planning and design.

Sometimes, people criticise plans as an excuse for inaction.

That doesn’t wash now.

There’s plenty happening in Adelaide, either under construction or about to be.

It’s our big build, worth billions.

A desalination plant being built to secure water for our city.

A redeveloped tram network.

A modernised, state-of-the-art electrified and extended suburban train system.

A world class hospital and medical research centre.

The biggest road building roll-out in our history.

A high-tech defence precinct at suburban Osborne, where Air Warfare Destroyers will be built.

And an upgraded Adelaide Oval, for footy as well as cricket.
Our city is experiencing a massive, unprecedented investment in infrastructure.

But both the planning, and the biggest infrastructure build ever means we must also embrace world’s best practice in architecture and urban design.

I’m not just talking about the better design of buildings, but also the spaces between them.

It’s about a greener, more vibrant city, for pedestrians and cyclists, as well as cars. 

It’s about a commitment to quality streetscapes, as well as better roads and public transport. 

It’s about a city that people want to come to, rather than leave.

For years, we have looked at planning issues or areas within our CBD, in isolation.

It is the same in cities around Australia.

A patchwork quilt that is patched, not interwoven.

Too often, it’s been a slanging match.

Heritage versus development, but never about building future heritage.

I want South Australia to be as celebrated for excellence in design as we are for our wines, our festivals, our leadership in renewable energy.

But it’s got to be integrated design.

The recent work and recommendations of our Canadian Thinker in Residence, Architecture Professor Laura Lee, have challenged us to do better.

Much better.

Her work was a collaboration with local architects, local planners, local business, local and State Government.

The South Australian Government has listened and, in an Australian first, we will establish an Integrated Design Commission to better co-ordinate and add value to the changing face of our city.

This is critically important as we face the challenges of population growth and climate change, the need to be smarter with our water and energy use, a growing economy, and our greater embrace of public transport.

We are not creating another level of bureaucracy.

The Integrated Design Commission will have an enabling and co-ordinating role, and will advise us on how we can better improve the quality of life of our cities and communities around the State through better design, and by fostering innovation.

It will ensure that our future development and infrastructure investment is better co-ordinated and of the highest quality, not something we, or our children, will regret later.

The South Australian Government will seek to attract a Commissioner with international leadership credentials, supported by an advisory board of leaders from the building industry, from architecture, planning and design backgrounds.

Like other States, a Government Architect will be appointed as part of this team to make sure we’re as proud of the new heritage we build, as we are of the old heritage we seek to preserve.

Through COAG, the Prime Minister has challenged the Premiers to do better with urban design, given that the Commonwealth is now partnering with us in infrastructure.

Through this initiative, I am determined South Australia will not only meet his challenge, but lead Australia in doing so.


- Follow Mike on Twitter at @premiermikerann

25 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • stephen says:

      06:07am | 18/01/10

      I’ ve been to Adelaide once, in 1988. It reminded me of Houston in 1950.
      Now I’ve never been to Houston - or to America - but ‘lady ‘laide’ has that old world charm, (without, unfortunately, the charm.)
      Mr. Rann, your town is just old. She seems like old america, with a few pretty sandstone buildings (I was looking for clark kent ), boring straight up-and-down roads, and, unfortunately, a very good transport system.(That’s only cause there’s no-where to go )
      I think S.A. has the prettiest country anywhere, and Adelaide deserves the very best treatment. She’s a desert city. That’s the theme I reckon, and the next time I go to Adelaide, I don’t wanna be staring through the glass of a 30 year old bank building (which bank?) wonderin’ ‘which way’s the Guggenheim’.

    • Joe Public unfortunately says:

      07:29am | 18/01/10

      Mr Rann, What exactly is the point of the tramline extension down Port Rd when 50 metres away is the train line? It makes absolutely no sense, you’d almost think you’re doing it just to keep good with developers. Oh speaking of developers and getting “better by design” do you think it is fair that you’re taking away St Clair reserve from the public to sell to developers and replacing it with a block of land to become the new park that used to be a factory site now on contaminated land? Doesn’t sound like a good deal for the public that one. I appreciate you sending out the half-wit for Croydon (or should that be North Adelaide)  to try and sell it but the letters laced with your spin coming from local councillors from Charles Sturt council were pretty galling. Sorry Mr Rann but this crap and the R-rated DVD cover up in video stores (a real Atkinson special clearly cooked up with FF) say to me you are becoming fat & tired in government and are solely interested in greasing the required wheels to keep power. You no longer deserve my vote. And no you won’t be getting it back from preferences either.

    • Paul says:

      09:24am | 18/01/10

      Well you designed your city on the arse end of Australias biggest farming and water disaster. A slow disaster that was studied to death by some of the worlds top scientists. What is humanly heroic or soulful about your wishful McCastle built in the desert, with no regard for water- or the longevity of its farming sectors- and dictated to by architecturally cost sensitive developers with McMansion tendancies? Perhaps you have confused design, science and planning, with Mike fairy tales where once again you play the out of touch hero? And who, after several years in power, promises to plan for a 30 year plan?  Desperate spin mate. Perhaps you are also planning to wait for planning salvation from Abbott’s heroic Green Army or a miracle-like city beatification?

    • Liz says:

      09:54am | 18/01/10

      Hopefully the plans involve making sure no more valuable agricultural land disappears under McMansions as it is rapidly doing down South.Heritage listing sould involve tracts of land as well as farm and agricutural buildings and settlers’ cottages, many of these rapidly being lost.The character of our countryside is disappearing faster and faster under a rash of bad buildings and bad council decisons..witness Sellicks’ Beach.
      Trust also that plans for the River Murray to be saved are moving rapidly as time is running out.Maybe you should try channelling back Old Tom!

    • Lucas says:

      11:39am | 18/01/10

      Sounds as promising as Melbourne 2030 which then got sheleved into the too hard basket when people complained about the inner suburban “renewal” contained therein.
      I love the thought of good planning, but the fixation current ALP governments have with planning and committees and summits (craftily disguised junkets) as distinct from actual delivery makes it hard to trust you Mr Rann.

    • Alex says:

      11:50am | 18/01/10

      Why must new houses be derided as “McMansions”?  It’s a dodge, not an argument.

      We hear daily about the housing shortage in our cities, and rapidly rising prices for existing houses.  More houses are built on the fringes to accommodate the growing population, and to house those who can’t afford inner city prices.  Oppose that if you must, but do it with a cogent argument, not McInsults.

      Liz: if you want to preserve the character of the countryside, please do - buy some and keep it intact.

    • Liz says:

      07:34am | 19/01/10

      Already did thanks Alex.McMansions are called such because they are built in a rubbish way with no regard for design,self-sufficiency or their huge and wasteful use of power and other resources.
      Councils and Government need to develop more imaginative ways to solve the ‘problem’ of housing our growing population.Not everyone wants to live further and further out of town.
      Once all the useful agricultural land has gone under bricks and mortar where will be get our food from? It can’t be replaced ever and is a shortsighted practise that must stop if we are to be viable.

    • George says:

      12:31pm | 19/01/10

      Liz says:
      “McMansions are called such because they are built in a rubbish way with no regard for design,self-sufficiency or their huge and wasteful use of power and other resources.”
      Hmm - so I take it you are an architect and design specialist, Liz ?
      I’ve seen plenty one-story houses (you know - the ones you don’t call McMansions, that comply 100% with your definition - rubbish, no design, huge and wasteful.

    • Dallas Beaufort says:

      12:17pm | 18/01/10

      After a long list of backroom deals, the Multi - Function Polis died a disgraceful death at the hands of these do nothing labor leading lights on the hill, where the only thing they can really take responsible for is building their own pay packet. Its about time that green labor gets out of the way and allows the proven performance based creative class to express themselves again in the building of livable communities to sustain a nation. The cost of housing is not the only way to improve incomes!

    • BULMKT says:

      01:05pm | 18/01/10

      Where are the new Dams, Mr. Rann?
      Your city is at the arse end of the Murray and the Desert. You’d been far better off in the long term to have built a new hydro dam.

    • Angry George says:

      09:04pm | 19/01/10

      Desert, you reckon? You eastern-centric morons are no smarter than Americans that think milk is made in a factory. Adelaide is a coastal city (with some of the finest beaches in the country, but our tourism authorities are too gutless to take on the pile of dirt and drunken tossers that make up Queensland beaches) and, being bounded by hills inland, we normally have more than adequate rainfall. However, in times of national drought we suffer too, and that’s made worse by you selfish arsehats upstream that think that just because the media is based in your stinking big towns that you’re the centre of the frickin’ universe.

      Grow up, do a bit of research before you dump on a place you’ve never been and go back to your failed state. We’re doing quite nicely here, thank you, and you’re not welcome.

      By the way, it’s all well and good to be ‘big’, but success comes from growth - and we have potential. Pantloads of it. Suck it up.

    • Dom says:

      01:29pm | 18/01/10

      Is Mike Rann a member of the ALP, who is this journalist?

    • KJ says:

      01:49pm | 18/01/10

      BULMKT, a hydro dam? you don’t actually know where Adelaide is do you?

    • Ned says:

      02:52pm | 18/01/10

      Liz, new houses are derided as McMansions because they deserve to be. They take up entire blocks, leaving little space for green areas. They are built within centimetres of the adjoining houses, they are environmentally unfriendly (in this country we should be building classic country homesteads - single-story solid brick with wide verandahs) and the design is largely crap (although I’ll admit this is subjective). Most are also far too big. Most families do not need to live in houses as big as today’s.

    • James says:

      03:19pm | 18/01/10

      Good city planning is essential, sadly it is not common.  I think Justin Madden would have to be the last person on Earth I would want in planning a city.  Adelaide is reasonally well planned, Melbourne probably started off pretty good but is going downhill fast, Sydney started bad and got worse.  Canberra, would be good if it wasn’t for a complete lack of public transport.  Perth also reasonalbly well planned and decent public transport.  It is probably the best designed city in Australia and it isn’t really that great.

    • 6clegs says:

      04:03pm | 18/01/10

      (I grew up in Adelaides north eastern suburbs, also lived at Belair, Happy Valley, and Lower Hermitage. Have lived in Tassie since 1975, my youngest son & his family live at Mt Barker (in the Hills). I’ve always loved Sth Australia-the countryside, towns and the city. I get back there only frequently these days)
      What scares me is how the Adelaide hills have become suburbia! Sure there is the Hwy, but only skinny country lanes connect the thousands of homes needed to get to the Hwy to get out in case of fire!
      How the agricultral ability of the hills district has been allowed to be covered in houses is a scandal!

      The Capital City of Sth Aust IMHO should have been moved to a more sustainable area in The Sth East. THAT is where you should be encouraging growth, Mr Rann. Adelaide, at least the country Adelaide is on surely cannot handle any more ‘growth’.
      If you want to see how heritage buildings have been used into the 21st century you need to visit Launceston where the CBD is 95% Heritage.

      Will these new buildings have Green stars and be efficient? or will it be more of the same blandness that lurks along every street-cape except King William Road and Nth Terrace?

    • Chewy says:

      05:16pm | 18/01/10

      How I wish Mike Rann, Paul Keating or someone else could stand up for the destruction inflicted upon us poor and unfortunate souls who happen to live in the safe liberal electorate of Ku ring gai. Where councils and opposition are impotent to stop tree lined streets and federation homes being buldozed to make room for the latest grey generic ten storey McAppartment building designed offshore and brought to you by the doners behind the largess of NSW ALP. The area is scarred beyond repair. Truly gut wrenching.
      http://www.smh.com.au/national/friendless-and-furious-kuringgai-fights-for-life-20090918-fvcr.html

    • Jon says:

      05:42pm | 18/01/10

      My opinion of Labor is at rock bottom, they make the problems then delight in telling us plebs how they will fix them. I equally have no faith in the other lot. The disaster that is NSW Labor is politcally and structurally plain to see. My feeling that the Labor machine needs to be totally rebuilt with a new mind set able to meet the complexity of the future. Sadly Mike Rann is product of broken system and his rhetoric sounds a lot like the crap they spew out in good old NSW.

    • TWH says:

      06:27pm | 18/01/10

      Dear Premier,
      When I remove the ‘spin’ from this article, there is unfortunately very little substance in the 1,005 words (yes, I counted them) you wrote today.

      Your use of hyperbole and statements designed to send a focus group into sweat is nothing but bread and circuses.

      You should be ashamed that in the choice to actually take a hard decision or   take the easy path will ensure your legacy is more about spin than substance.

      I welcome anyone to re-read the Premier’s article and evaluate how much is spin compared to substance.

      You have made no commitment about integrated planning - just platitudes.

      You will find the article unsatisfactorily wanting.

    • Michael says:

      07:42pm | 18/01/10

      This sounds great - but where IS Adelaide?

    • Zwiebodin says:

      10:45pm | 18/01/10

      I live in Adelaides inner west. The state electorate is Croydon.  My experience indicates that this new planning world will be far from brave, and maybe that’s the problem - not enough of the Keating or Dunston charisma to move the electorate - let alone inspire us. Maybe a “leader in residence” might be better than any number of thinkers passing through.

      The “Transport Orientated Development” in Bowden began its life swathed in vision statements, but through a thousand “stakeholder” cuts has turned into something truly pedestrian.

      And the local Councils contribution is a proposal to actually reduce the residential heritage and character zones over large areas of the electorate without indicating in any way how it will “embrace world’s best practice in architecture and urban design” to forestall the inevitable market forces this will attract.

    • 6clegs says:

      11:05pm | 18/01/10

      “Chewy” thanks for that link, I had no idea that was happening to that beautiful area!  how sad.

      and govt want this country to support 35million people?! call me selfish/dumb/wotevah but where is the water for all these people comming from?!
      (no-one tell ‘‘the developers’’ about Tassie, I couldn’t stand it)

    • Stewart says:

      06:48pm | 19/01/10

      Good design requires the involvement of good designers.  I believe less than 1 percent of buildings in Adelaide have been designed by a registered Architect.  Looking around at the built environment in Adelaide this is certainly believable.

      Just imagine what a difference it would make if ALL buildings were designed by an Architect (likewise if Landscape Architects were involved in ALL public space works ... rather than leaving it to engineers and the likes)?

    • Terry Walsh says:

      10:08am | 20/01/10

      As the Urban Development Institute of Australia (SA) Executive Director I see Adelaide as having an opportunity to become a city of good design, not only on buildings but of communities with integrated spaces for housing, transport access, leisure and retail.

      We have the desire in the development industry, we need the support of our planning authorities to recognise the need to plan for the future not simply defend the past that may not appeal to all of us.

      Heritage has a necessary place in development of urban space.  We need to balance the preservation of the past with use of vantage spaces for contemporary designed dwellings suitable for the current requirements – that then become the heritage buildings of the next century.

      Too many commentators and planning approvers err on the side of ‘too much retention of the old simply because it is old’.  The heritage dwellings we need to keep must make a statement about the era and provide enjoyment for the majority in the future.

    • Joe Rossi ex MP says:

      12:37pm | 08/09/10

      Mr. Don Dunstan his idol organised the Natural gas Pipelines Authority building and roof leaked in the first winter. Mr. Don Dunstan organised the Natural gas Pipelines Authority building and roof leaked in the first winter. Mr. Don Dunstan organised the building of Adelaide Festival centre behind Parliament House and the roof leaked. Mr. Don Dunstan his idol organised the Rundle Street Male. Mr. Rann has forgotten to extend it to Hind ley St which has remained a dump. Mr. Don Dunstan organised the West Lakes suburb by getting ride of the wet lands and then made new wet lands at Salisbury. Mr. Don Dunstan got ride of the local trams and he Rann is putting them back in at tax payer’s expense. Overseas town planners are making wide road for increased motor traffic. Rann and Atkinson are making matchbox houses with narrow one way vehicle streets. Call this progress,  Call this vision? I call it a joke.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

How we're getting ripped off at the ATM http://t.co/Vpu8DuHy

Anthony Sharwood

The factory where they make Boeing aeroplanes is the world's largest building #Todaysrandomfact.

Lucy Kippist

Can you wear skinny jeans when you're old enough to get a hip replacement? You bet: http://t.co/14b6UGnY

tory_maguire

@jessmcguire I can't decide if that's the best thing ever or really troubling!

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Hipsters with hip replacements

Hipsters with hip replacements

Someone once told me that when people reach a certain age they begin dressing in the manner they did…

La dole cheque vita is not so sweet on $16 a day

La dole cheque vita is not so sweet on $16 a day

Your task is simple. Here is $115.50. It must last one week. You have no savings, no assets, but thankfully…

Those greedy ATMs gobble up more than your card

Those greedy ATMs gobble up more than your card

We’ve been talking a lot about interest rates this week. And the 30 per cent of us who have mortgages…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Punch on: Open thread 09/02/2012

marley says:

I'm one of the older ones, so I've certainly seen a few changes in my time. When I started school I learned to write with a nib pen, dipped in an inkwell (no, I'm not kidding). My mother became a dab hand at getting inkstains out of my clothes. Flicking ink at one another in the classroom was an essential… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

151 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter