If Ralph Waldo Emerson was right when he said: “a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds,” then the Australian Greens must hold the bragging rights to having the biggest brains.

ACT Greens Amanda Bresnan, right, with party colleagues Meredith Hunter and Shane Rattenbury. File photo

For no other political Party has the ability to be so inconsistent when it comes to public policy than the Greens.

Two recent incidents, which received huge media attention, demonstrated this perfectly.

Here in the nation’s capital, one of the Greens’ MLAs Amanda Bresnan was outraged when, as a joke, two other politicians pretended to pick her up and throw her off stage during a trivia night to raise funds for a 10-year-old girl’s wheelchair.

She wrote and demanded an apology of the two male MLAs, one Labor and the other a Liberal. Both said they thought they were acting in a lighthearted fashion before apologising, but not before Bresnan had told the chief minister she was “deeply offended” at their actions.

The story ran for days and proved the last straw for Labor’s John Hargreaves, who quit the ministry, although it should be noted his career was already under a cloud.

While this was being played out, in Sydney, another high profile drama involving the Greens was unfolding, although this one was far more sinister.

On the first day of a NSW upper house parliamentary inquiry into land dealings in Sydney’s west, Greens MP Sylvia Hale asked a property developer whether he had anything to do with the murder of seamy businessman Michael McGurk.

“You’ve got to be joking. You’re a shocker,” an outraged Ron Medich replied. “This is a bloody disgrace.”

It was. Medich had not been arrested or accused of any crime, but the Greens MP had effectively turned the inquiry into a courtroom, where the “witness” was given no representation.

By turning the inquiry into a kangaroo court, Hale injected herself into headlines right around the country but traduced a man’s access to what most would describe as a fundamental right and a cornerstone of the rule of law in Australia.

I wouldn’t have a clue who Ron Medich is or what he’s been up to in land dealings but I support his right to defend himself in a real court with a real judge, not in a Greens’ media opportunity.

While it might just be me trying to inject a bit of consistency into the two events, I find it hard to get worked up about Amanda Bresnan’s offended feminist sensibilities after her male colleagues pretended to pick her up and throw her offstage.

Particularly when Ron Medich had his rights and reputation picked up, chucked on the floor and trampled on by Sylvia Hale.

All of this serves to underscore just how inconsistent the Greens can be when it suits them. And it shows just how far they will go to generate media coverage as a minor Party floating under the radar of real scrutiny.

Imagine the outcry if a serious politician had asked Medich the same question.

For a Party which bangs on about human rights ad nauseum, it clearly had little regard for those Ron Medich. And anyone who follows the political debate like I do as a professional campaigner who now consults to the Liberal Party, would know that the hobgoblin of consistency does not trouble their approach to policy.

Here in the ACT, the Greens campaigned hard to win four seats and the balance of power at the last election.

But after telling anyone who listened that their policies held the key to a better future, they refused to accept the offer to take on actual ministerial portfolios as part of a coalition.

The Greens were offered two ministeries, including the environment portfolio, but turned it down, preferring to sit on the backbench and support another term of Labor government.

Despite promising to lower everyday household bills and to achieve better education standards in ACT—code for reopening the dozens of schools closed by Labor before the last election – they have done little or nothing.

Household bills and rates have steadily risen and just last week they backed Labor in maintaining the vast majority of school closures.

But they continue to exploit media opportunities and keep complaining about all the stuff they could have fixed had they taken on the responsibility offered to them and accepted a real job with real decision making and real accountability.

Most bizarely, they keep endlessly calling for more to be done on the environment, seemingly oblivious to the fact that one of them would now be the environment minister had they just accepted the responsibility of taking on the portfolio.

Why anyone would vote for a Party which campaigns for a chance to make real decisions and effect real change, but refuses to take the opportunity when it’s sitting on a plate is beyond me.

That’s a hobgoblin I just can’t seem to shake. Maybe it’s just my small mind. I don’t believe so. I think it’s because they aren’t up to it.

Most commented

37 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • watty says:

      06:58am | 30/10/09

      Would it be unkind to summarise that the Greens are a waste of space who rely more on publicity stunts than developing workable policies?

    • Mobius Ecko says:

      07:04am | 30/10/09

      The Greens inconsistent?

      Have you seen the performance of the Federal opposition over the last two years, the epitome of inconsistency?

    • Liz says:

      07:06am | 30/10/09

      Seems everyone takes too seriously the things that aren’t serious and doesn’t take seriously the things that are.Shouldn’t the Greens be getting on with saving the dying Murray,finding better sources of water and power so we don’t have to build wind farms that kill Wedge-tail eagles?
      Seems we scarcely have any effective opposition these days to keep the Government honest.

    • John A Neve says:

      07:25am | 30/10/09

      When will people wake up to the fact that politics is no longer, if ever, about serving the community. It’s a well paid job, where results have little bearing on maintaining your seat. Getting pre-selection is often harder than getting elected.
      What we have in this country is the Pollie Club, ask yourself, have many pollies have partners, parent/s or other relatives in the same game?
      Ask yourself, who employs most of them after they retire or get disenfranchised?
      Ask yourself, who comes first, the party or the electorate?

      Wake up Australia.

    • watty says:

      07:27am | 30/10/09

      Mobius…hate to tell you but you are pinching Rudd’s lines.

      Try and concentrate,,,even give examples of the Greens “consistency”

      Perthaps an explanation of their consistent opposition to more dams being built in a drought stricken country.

      Or why “sunny’ California used only 1% of the Greens much vaunted solar power in their 2008 energy mix?

      Many,many years ago the Luddites had similar policies and the change of name doesn’t fool too many.

    • Darren says:

      07:47am | 30/10/09

      In NSW the Greens stopped being an environmental party a long time ago - people like Ian Cohen have been pushed to the side by the Rhiannon camp -

    • Daniel says:

      08:07am | 30/10/09

      Personally i think the ACT Greens are doing a great job with the limited numbers in the ACT government they do have. If only this was replicated across Australia more we wouldnt have so many scandals and dramas such as what we have in NSW with deadwood Rees.

    • Disaffected says:

      08:22am | 30/10/09

      Gazard’s own cv hardly inspires confidence in his objectivity, however, in this case I agree with him.

      In the ACT, the Greens have staggered from farce to farce. No “Leader” in their pure Party.  No grubby Ministers in their pure Party.  Tosh.  All carp and no responsibility. All promise and no practical progress.

      Now we see Dr Clive Hamilton, once of the Australia Institute and the concocted GPI measure, as Greens candidate for the Federal seat of Higgins. Head of his *own* little think tank, Hamilton was disgustingly adept at gathering good information and comprehensively misrepresenting it to his own ends.

      A plague on him,  and on all the Greens, with their poorly focussed, poorly realised policies, too-often hysterically expressed.

    • CArl Palmer says:

      08:58am | 30/10/09

      I’m not a great fan of the greens. If the statement by Mr Gazard that “The Greens were offered two ministeries, including the environment portfolio, but turned it down, preferring to sit on the backbench and support another term of Labor government” is true then it only reinforces my perception of the party.
      Their contribution to the climate change debate has been nothing less than woeful, inept and void of any meaningful contribution. There are many other environment issues which unfortunately have the same outcome for The Greens - NOT.

    • Nateasaurus says:

      09:03am | 30/10/09

      Gazzard, talk about those in glass houses… The federal liberal party has been a disgrace the last two years, ruled by bitter infighting and an inability to present a unified front. They can’t form their own policies when it comes to environmental issues themselves.

      As far as your attack on Sylvia Hale and Amanda Bresnan - how do their personal actions have any relevance to Greens policy. Amanda is entitled to feel outraged as she so wishes, and while I agree Hale’s actions were out of line, it’s not like the other parties aren’t the same. You’ve got Wilson Tuckey sitting in the back throwing doubts into the public spectrum about his own leader, Belinda Neal abusing restaurant employees - there are nitwits in every political chamber at every level of parliament in Australia. What is the point of pointing out the actions of two Greens MPs as though they are an aberration.

      I don’t know much about the ACT’s current parliament, but to me it makes no sense them forming a coalition with the Liberals. In many cases your policies are polar opposites, it’s the far left and the (increasingly) far right of the political spectrum. You simply sound bitter that the Libs are relegated to opposition again.

      My final point - The Greens aren’t a major party. They are a minority, and as such it’s not their role to be the consistent opposition that the Liberals/Nationals or Labor have to be. They are a minor party that continues to, at least on a federal level, represent the concerns of their voters against an increasingly centralist Labor government. They continue to ‘keep the bastards honest’ when every other minor party in the last 10 years (see: One Nation, Democrats, even the Nationals are failing) disappears from the political spectrum. I think Bob Brown and co are doing a great job with the limited influence they have.

    • Tim says:

      09:06am | 30/10/09

      Ha ha Daniel that’s Hilarious. The ACT Greens are the biggest waste of space ever to grace the Legislative assembly.
      The only things they’ve managed to achieve is whinge.
      Oh sorry, they’ve also managed to help enact legislation that will raise household power and water bills, hurting the poorest residents, whilst achieving no environmental benefits.
      They had their chance to take a portfolio but instead choose to sit on the sidelines, so they would never have any real responsibility. What a surprise.

    • H says:

      09:15am | 30/10/09

      Witness also the Greens driving investigations into the Exclusive Brethren and trying to stop them campaign against the Greens. For a “human rights party” they don’t seem to care much for the right speech…..

    • Cal says:

      09:15am | 30/10/09

      I was at the event involving Ms Bresnan and how you can call an incident that you were not at “a joke” requires an explanation. How do you know it was a ‘joke’? Are you saying that a female politician man-handled against her will in public is funny? Are you seriosuly suggesting that any politician picked up by two men and treated like a toy to be thrown about should just be laughed off? Is that the message we send out to young women wanting to enter politics - just be prepared for a bit of groping and boys stuff, it’s all part of the ‘game’? Let me put it this way - if Albo and Barnaby grabbed Julie Bishop at a public forum and pretended to hurl her into a crowd, would that be a joke? I doubt it. By all means attack a party’s policies, but to call being man-handled in public at a fund raiser a joke says more about the author than the victim.

    • paul says:

      09:24am | 30/10/09

      Why continue to market a dud product David? Instead of flogging a Labor-lite, corporate-muppets copycat political Liberal party, why not use some imagination and come up with some different policies and offer choices instead of scapegoating minor parties? The Libs must be in a desperate political ditch if you are targeting the Greens?

    • deconst says:

      09:25am | 30/10/09

      What a cynical article. Let’s see you enter politics and do better.

      Of course the Greens rely on media stunts. All politicians today too. The smaller the party, the more you rely on them - just look at Mr X and Fielding. Do you think the media has the time and the resources to actually examine party’s policies?

      The Greens don’t have the polished image of the Liberals and the ALP because they can’t afford the ad agencies and PR consultants. When the Greens slip up, they don’t have the benefit of greased hands in opinion journalism to apologise for them.

      The honest truth is the Greens represent the best force in progressive politics in Australia today.

    • Chase Stevens says:

      09:38am | 30/10/09

      So what? It’s not like the greens are different from any other party in terms of publicity, and who wouldn’t want to vote for the only progressive party left in Australia? They’re the only party that will enact laws to defend human rights (See ACT greens attempting to allow gay marriage, marriage being a human right according to the UN)

    • Tim says:

      09:47am | 30/10/09

      Yes Chase, marriage is a human right according to the UN.
      Gay people are free to get married in Australia as defined under our law.

    • Margaret Gray says:

      09:59am | 30/10/09

      Greens are little more than an ideologically-driven sewing circle.

      Never having to do any of the heavy-lifting means you have more time to piss and moan about how you’d solve life’s ills, invariably done with a heavy emphasis on Nanny State invective and clueless misanthropy.

      They are also the greatest source of observational comedy and taste great when slow roasted with a sprig of rosemary.

    • Leonid says:

      10:04am | 30/10/09

      The Greens actually are completely (and horribly) consistent.

      Old commos may adopt new guises but they never change their spots.  They just keep using the same old politically correct dogma to try to bring down the democratic society that generously allows them free rein to do so.

    • bella starkey says:

      10:34am | 30/10/09

      I really dont think you can criticise someone for being upset by two men picking her up and pretending to through her. Not funny, at all.

      It is pretty much assault.

      F*** your mind is demented if you think that is remotely ok.

    • paul says:

      10:36am | 30/10/09

      @margaret so we should take a faith based approach and vote for the dysfunctional NSW Libs? Arn’t the Libs about to be hijacked by the Christian Neocon Faction? Be truthful @leonids yeah and Neocons are pretty consistent and predictable these days too.

    • Matt Horan says:

      10:44am | 30/10/09

      Oh no! I find myself agreeing with Gazzy! Must. Stop. Now….

    • Helen says:

      11:00am | 30/10/09

      What Cal and Bella said. So far the Greens party is much further ahead than either Labor or the Coalition in recognising that women are human beings and not some kind of sub species to be groped and humiliated. The author doesn’t get it and is being left behind in the smelly locker room of history.

    • steve says:

      11:50am | 30/10/09

      Women are a sub species? goodness girl lighten up
      Call them green all you like they will always be the Communist Party
      They sit on the side lines, carping, knowing they will never have to bear the responsibility of actually getting into power and having to deliver on their “off with the fairies” promises. Can you imagine what would happen to the economy of they did. Spain, here we come, even there would look good

    • Cameron Price-Austin says:

      12:18pm | 30/10/09

      There is inconsistency in the Federal government’s policies as well.

      They’re proceeding with plans for a mandatory Internet filter, in order to ‘protect Australian children online’, yet as soon as they came to power they cancelled a program (started by the Liberals) which was offering free client-side Internet filters to parents.

      The arrogance is astounding.

    • SimonH says:

      12:47pm | 30/10/09

      Lovely to hear you’re the champion of the rights to due process and legal representation of… millionaire property developers.

      You’re aware that there is no right to legal representation before being confronted by an allegation of criminal wrongdoing, put by anyone other than investigating police?

      If you think there is such a right, you must have been apppalled by the media who asked Bruce Burrell where the bodies were, years before he was charged. Or that avalanche of reality police shows where alleged ne’er-do-wells are paraded before the cameras for public revilement, without court judgment or acccess to counsel.

      To accuse a political party of inconsistency because they humourlessly demand they humourlesssly demand their rights in one context, while trampling on a ‘right’ that doesn’t exist in a totally different context… gee, whip them with a feather at the end of a long bow. It’s not exactly inconsistency on whether we should have a GST or whether carbon trading should be legislated, is it?

    • stephen says:

      01:51pm | 30/10/09

      RWE was right on just about everything he wrote, and it’s a shame he didn’t inform the Greens that ‘greeness,’ like the defunct Democrats, (Democracy) is a means, not an end. That is, after you get ‘green’ then you must vote another Party in to develop an economy/culture. There’re not worth a single vote.

    • Elle says:

      01:58pm | 30/10/09

      I am mortified and outraged by this article written by a liberal lobbyist no doubt and Howard Hack.

      Gazard’s only two examples of inconsistency was an individual taking offense to the prospect of being thrown off stage and a woman of absolute integrity, and Gazard what I would call a ‘serious politician’ Sylvia Hale having the courage to ask a corrupt and dodgy developer if he had murdered McGurk. A question on the mind of every Australian.

      No wonder the Liberals are struggling having someone who writes a blog with only two strands of weak evidence as a ‘consultant’.

      Would you be a labor MP if they offered you a job? I’d say not. The Greens are a separate party to Labor and have the strength to say no to cushy jobs and fight the hard way for REAL change. On a local level, my Greens councillor is contributing a great deal to the local community and environment. On a state level I am proud of the Greens serving us including Lee Rhiannon. The Greens are fighting for our future; you are fighting for your wallet.

    • EB says:

      02:15pm | 30/10/09

      Crikey’s ‘Where 220 ex Howard staffers are now’: David Gazard:
      Former Howard pressie, who went to Westpac in government relations and then to Cos to John Brogden, then to Kay Patterson, then Abbott and now with Costello.

      ....Now writing poor quality blogs. As Barry O’Farrell stated in a recent article- this blog would fall under the ‘trite cliches and stereotypes’ category.

    • Tim says:

      02:18pm | 30/10/09

      Simon H,
      i didn’t know you had a right to demand an apology for jokingly being picked up either.

    • The Greens Want Us All To Burn says:

      02:54pm | 30/10/09

      David Gazard - you are being unfair!  Shame!  You left off one important thing from your list the Greens are consistent on at the Federal level.  VOTING NO FOR EVERYTHING!

      <check Handsard for confirmation>

    • Margaret Gray says:

      02:54pm | 30/10/09

      “...The Greens are fighting for our future; you are fighting for your wallet…”

      Your indignation is misguided.

      My ‘wallet’ along with those of millions of others is what keeps this country running, dear.

      You would do well to remember that at your next rally about “our future”.

      That the Greens would choose Clive Hamilton and vice versa speaks volumes about the moral bankruptcy deeply entrenched in both.

    • SimonH says:

      03:18pm | 30/10/09

      Tim,
      You have a right not to be assaulted. If it’s ‘all japes between mates here’, then there is the quaint defence of ‘horseplay’ (seriously); but sadly our courts are littered with (almost exclusively) males who are disappointed that she couldn’t see the funny side.

    • Daniel says:

      03:18pm | 30/10/09

      Disaffected says:09:22am | 30/10/09


      So I guess your in favour of Rees and his deadwood mates going from sleaze to sleaze and sellout to sellout then ?

    • paul says:

      05:42pm | 30/10/09

      I wrote a letter to Lib Leader Barry O’Farrell suggesting that the Libs would regain some credibility and wider community trust if they banned ‘donations’ from big companies, instead of the Labor-lite policy of ‘limiting’ donations. (whatever that is supposed to mean -more dodginess?) Silence. No reply. You might know Gazard: Is anyone home at Liberal Headquarters?

    • DWest says:

      06:53am | 01/11/09

      I thought the Liberals got their political / internet censorship inspiration from the #1 Nanny State, Communist China. I love how just the mention of greens makes the conservatives lose their sh*t.  Hilarious.

    • Disaffected says:

      03:21pm | 01/11/09

      So that’s your best shot, Daniel. Put words in a bloke’s mouth, eh. Hows that for sleaze.

      Tough luck. Did I so much as mention NSW politics? No. 

      Kindly don’t pass off your words as mine, you poxy shill.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @adamroy37: Just received a phone call from a young girl apologizing for her actions. Lets support her please #racismitstopswithme#Indi

tory_maguire

RT @adamroy37: Just received a phone call from a young girl apologizing for her actions. Lets support her please #racismitstopswithme#Indi

Daniel Piotrowski

Australia. Where you die for your country and get a rest area named after you http://t.co/hO6LpfwDvI

ToryShepherd

@benpobjie @jessadamson7 @jhwakelin kinda creepy from a high school cheerleader #misheardlyrics

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter