I like a bit of luxury as much as the next person. A facial here, an upgrade there. God knows, I’d have more of it … if I could afford it.

Nikki also likes cutting her toenails with diamond-encrusted clippers.

But luxury tampons? Sorry, that’s just a teeny bit too far.

I spotted the ad last week. Gorgeous girl (mid-body shot only, no bloat evident). Looks like she never scoffs five burgers in a row or yells at her partner. Never gets PMT. And why would she? She’s using luxury tampons – presumably wrought from the pelt of a resting panda,  tufts of angora rabbit and a tennis bracelet.

These tampons are so fancy, they’ve given themselves platinum status. It’s “a touch of luxury where you need it most”.

Pardon? The only difference I can see is well-designed box (pardon the pun) and a jazzy website with lots of helpful info. It’s time to get a grip. This is one product where practicality and convenience rules.

Sure, the Federal Government has been trying to convince us for years that the humble tampon is the equivalent of, say, a knuckle-dragging diamond. That’s why we still pay GST on them.

But you don’t see feminine hygiene products emblazoned with Chanel’s iconic double C. You don’t see tampon rip-offs at the markets in Hong Kong or Bangkok. I’m yet to have a conversation with a friend (male or female) that started with the words “Did you see X’s tampon? Geez, I wish I could afford one of those.”

And if luxury equals status, the very notion of the trumped-up tampon begs one question: Who would ever know you were using one? Nope, this is marketing gone mad. The final frontier in the push for posh.

And it goes hand-in-hand with a trend that says only the best will do – for everyone, always – because, no matter that we bludged all day at work or bitched about our mates or kicked the cat, we deserve it.

We told daily we’re worth it. We’ve bought into the idea that $500 shoes are a ‘must-have’. That labels are such desirable social currency that we’ll fake it rather than admit we can’t afford - or (gasp!) don’t deserve - the real thing.

The market for “replica” luxury bags is worth an estimated $12bn a year. Consumers buy counterfeits bags, belts, sunnies and suits by the truckload. The American Marketing Association says it’s because we need a bit more love: fakes help “gain approval in social settings”.

But no matter how magnificent the luxury tampon, I can’t see a market for counterfeits any time soon. And I despair that marketers think some women will be so dim as to be sucked in by a bit of premium branding on a product that is, in the end, a necessity.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

27 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • T.Chong says:

      04:28am | 21/10/09

      Anne- you may be right, but the campaign has worked,as witnessed by the fact that this article is here.
      These blokes have earnt their money. You have given them publicity, and hilighted the “Luxury” aspect. All good publicity for them.  Evil,cynical advert men 1, outraged Anne 0 !

    • Big M says:

      06:11am | 21/10/09

      My question is if these tampons are better, why have they been holding back with the quality for?  Surely you want the best all the time.

    • Liz says:

      06:27am | 21/10/09

      A fake’s a fake in my book however much it cost.Can’t do much with a tampon to make it a luxury item except glam up the box.Maybe it’s a plot to avoid taking off the GST!

    • Pogs says:

      07:08am | 21/10/09

      what a bloody joke….

    • Steve Smith says:

      07:31am | 21/10/09

      Whats next? Premium Fuel?

    • Sam Chowder says:

      07:59am | 21/10/09

      Is this iOnPro V1 from Kraft?

    • Suze says:

      08:11am | 21/10/09

      This ad is a total turn off - I initially thought this was for condoms.

    • Clover says:

      08:28am | 21/10/09

      I used to work there - the UbK team are all women.

      When the ‘Beaver’ campaign came out people said the exact same thing: ‘It must have been thought up by a man’, but again - all women.

      Why is the first thought that because you don’t like it, it can’t have been thought up by a woman? Marketing people are marketing people. No matter what sex they are their job is to come up with new ways to sell the same things.

    • DG says:

      08:41am | 21/10/09

      “This is one product where practicality and convenience rules.” - Come off it. We are talking about a class of persons stupid enough to pay a premium for uncomfortable shoes - clothes that are too tight -  spend thousands for less than 1 cubic centimetre of compressed coal because it’s “pretty” - and we haven’t even gotten around to considering the hundreds of dollars on a bag to carry around things they don’t need.

      Marketing to women always has been, and always will be, about being special. Diamonds are special because??

      Marketing to men always has been, and always will be, about activity. You need a super-car car because??

      And BOTH gender’s (traditionally) see the tools of their ‘goals’ as an advertisement of success. Practicality is not a consideration of marketing to either group. However there is an increasing trend to advertise the safety and practicality of SOME products - which is undoubtedly a response to a our age of fear - and is generally linked to the protection and safety of loved ones (i.e a partner or kids).

      The reality is that women will wear uncomfortable or disfiguring things, and pay a premium for the privilege, because “It makes me feel special” or beautiful or some such nonsense - practicality is NEVER a consideration.

      You’re right, its because they have been told that they deserve to be treated special and the result - “When every one is special, no one is”.

      Now I appreciate that the manufacturer has the consumer at a disadvantage - but the point is that the generic brand has always been available and the manufacturers KNOW women will pay the extra for a so called “premium product”. Every 12/18 months they come up with a new “feature” that allegedly makes the product more effective, and increase the price a little with a new product - and you know what, women dive on the new product.

      Unfortunately I don’t share your optimism - I have no doubt that there will be plenty of people out there “so dim as to be sucked in by a bit of premium branding”. I suspect that it’ll be a popular line. Only time will tell.

      @Big M - you hold back technology for one reason. To increase demand. When you release something new, you get an initial rush of new customers and keep some of those new customers and will, from time to time, grab a few more customers with new packaging or a temporary reduction in price. When those two things stop increasing interest in your product, you introduce a new product with the new feature and the system starts again. This way you keep introducing new products and keep drawing customers from your competitors and also from your other lines (that are less profitable).

      @Liz - the fact that you care about the label or brand of the product (and where it was obtained) proves the point of the article. Your interest is in the status (i.e as proof of success)  rather than the practicality and purpose.

      I’m constantly having this discussion with my partner. I couldn’t care less about brand names, she INSISTS on brand names and gets so frustrated when I would rather buy ‘generic’ products that achieve the same purpose.

      There are exceptions: my sports gear MUST be of the highest quality (as a matter of practicality) regardless of brand, and my technology must have the right specs for my intended use (again regardless of brand). In these areas I am perhaps subject to marketing where the reputation of the product may influence whether I consider the product reliable.

    • Budz says:

      09:13am | 21/10/09

      It’s all about the status. You repackage a normal tampon in fancy packaging and market is as a status symbol, and women will buy it will every other status symbol brand name they buy. D&G sunnies with the Ralph Lauren shirt and now they can try and out do their friends with a luxury tampon too. Possibly to make the proud when they open their bag to get one out instead of embarassed?

    • June says:

      09:19am | 21/10/09

      Once again a faceless naked torso of an idealized woman is used to sell a product.  (Or after all these years, did I get it wrong. Should I have been inserting the tampon into my navel ...?!)

    • Kit says:

      09:33am | 21/10/09

      Hmmm, tampons aren’t a status symbol? Talk to a sixteen year old.
      I’m a few years out of High School now, but “back in the day” (okay, okay, I’m only 20) Moxie tampons were THE brand. Y’know, the regular look-like-every-other-product ones, except they cost a mint because they come packaged in those super cute little tins? We’d all be standing at the mirrors in the bathroom applying our contraband lipglosses and someone would ask if anyone could spot a “girly thing” and inevitably everyone would pull out a little Moxie tin in offerance. None of those ugly libra or carefree cardboard boxes that were crushed within a minute of bouncing in your bag with a million text books, sooooo last year!
      Sad, but I still use Moxie today. If anyone were to ask why, I’d probably just reply
      “we’ve been through a lot, Moxie and I.”

    • girly says:

      09:39am | 21/10/09

      At the end of day, I won’t be buying them. fail.

    • gavin says:

      09:40am | 21/10/09

      Maybe they are better. Try them out first.

    • Eric says:

      10:09am | 21/10/09

      Will Annie Markey apologise for the gratuitous and inaccurate slur on men in the title of this piece?

    • DG says:

      10:10am | 21/10/09

      June (10:19am | 21/10/09) - They wanted to show more but were concerned that Conroy’s internet filter would block their adds.

    • Fanny says:

      10:26am | 21/10/09

      Now there’s aspirational for you. I couldn’t give a hoot about the luxury tampons but I right now want a tin of Moxies more than anything!

    • Charles says:

      11:02am | 21/10/09

      If it were a product for men, attractive women would be involved in the imagery e.g. Cigars being seductively rolled by/against attractive female(s).

      Extending this same concept, the advertising could have involved eunuchs rolling the tampons by using their bodies.  Thank those above that we were spared from that.

      Luxury denotes something desirable that is not a necessity - can the ladies explain how these may be ‘desirable’ and/or ‘not a necessity’?

    • Max says:

      11:03am | 21/10/09

      Platinum Tampons… sounds cold, uncomfortable and non-absorbent

    • SJ says:

      11:18am | 21/10/09

      @ Kit - totally agree. Sad to say i also became a Moxie convert - “but only because they’re more practical and don’t get squished”.

      Very high embarassment factor when using old Libra boxes to find a maverick tampon stuck in the ring binding of my diary during class (Okay, i didn’t actually find it, it was the cutre exchange student sitting next to me who pointed it out.)

      However, almost gave up my Moxie affair this year when I realised the marketing gurus have so cleverly disguised the humble tampon it is beyond recognition. Took my partner a couple of minutes of mucking about with the “cool-looking” tin before asking what was in it. After hearing the answer, he waited half a second before throwing tin across the room in manner of Brett Lee trying to salvage the Ashes. My beautiful Moxie tin hit me in the face, and broke my $300 designer glasses.

      Perhaps it’s time to rethink my spending habits…

    • AFR says:

      11:26am | 21/10/09

      DG - interesting comments.I must admit I never really thought of it like that before. I must admit when I first saw the billboard, I couldn’t see how it would appeal to women.

    • Dee says:

      11:58am | 21/10/09

      Well, all I can say is: having my roots in Germany, within the last 3 years I have been living in Sydney now, I was not able to find a tampon brand here that could keep up in comfort with a particular German product… and call me crazy if you want, but I keep getting them send over to me in parcels, because I think if that’s not a necessity where comfort counts then one obviously deserves paying $500+ for painful shoes on top of it!

    • Weary says:

      02:13pm | 21/10/09

      Of course a man invented it.  Like 95% of all the inventions in the world.  Including the ‘regular’ tampon.  Even that took a man.  I guess he felt sorry for women who were struggling with the disgusting and unhygenic alternatives of the day, but couldn’t think of a solution.  But why single out this invention?  Why not cars, aeroplanes, computers, the monetary system, languages, the renaissance….the list is endless - and they were all men.  Thank god these men worked so hard to create all the things YOU use every day and which make your life so much easier and richer.  Let me guess - your lack of objectivity stems from what you think is ‘feminism’? (sniggers)

    • Shane says:

      12:47am | 22/10/09

      HaHa! I actually came in to post a (funny?) comment that Eric would have something to say about how men are hard done by in the sexism arena… and he was already there! good on ya Big E, consistent to the end. Even a humourous piece on women’s hygeine can irk you. Because you’re obviously an tampon expert enough to comment on Politically Incorrect Titles. What do you use them for? Let your kitten play with them or ...?
      “Hi, my name is Eric and I only log into Punch to tell people that they (and the whole world) is sexist against men”
      You peanut.

    • Hi gene says:

      11:53am | 26/10/09

      What are you all talking about? Moxie tampons cost the same as any of the others. It’s the unnecessarily earth-raping packaging you should be worried about.

    • Eliza says:

      03:32pm | 28/10/09

      Platinum + tampon? Err, thanks to the marketing brains trust for this cold, hard, metallic, uncomfortable (and not terribly absorbant) mental image, but I’ll pass.  This really is marketing gone mad.

    • Eliza's boyfriend says:

      03:56pm | 28/10/09

      My first thought when I saw the ad for platinum tampons was, that’s gotta hurt.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter