In the past week we have all grieved in our own particular way over something lost. For some it was trivial: a train ticket, phone number, or perhaps a bet on the big race. For the more unfortunate it was something significantly worse: a job, a house, a friend or loved one.

It's as if it really happened.

But for much of Australia, it seems, as millions gather to attend tonight’s funeral, it has been the loss of Melissa Rafter.

The something I’m currently concerned with losing is our collective plot.

It seemed to disappear for good last week, when Wednesday’s biggest news story was about the writers of Packed to the Rafters putting down their pens for a popular character because the actress who plays her—the admittedly lovely Zoe Ventoura—is off to seek work in the USA.

‘Mel’s Death a Shock!’ headlines grasped for our attention, while on the same page a smaller caption and photo announced that the body discovered on a Central Coast beach was indeed that of missing teenager Matthew Appleby. Then further down the page, even smaller, was the story about the cold-blooded execution of another teenager in western Sydney.

Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m a big fan of television. I may not watch Packed to the Rafters, but can appreciate how the fans are feeling—I’m happy to admit I cried like a girl during the Lost finale, partly because of the bittersweet end to Jack’s story, partly because after six years of dedication I still had no idea what the bloody island was.

But last week it struck me how very strange and unsettling it is that TV death (in media terms, at least) can be more important than the deaths of very real, and in the cases mentioned above, very young Australian people.

So why do we feel such attachment to fictional people? We know they have been written with us, the audience, in mind. We know that every event in their lives is carefully predetermined by writers, hidden away in a room somewhere, playing God with a select cast of genetically-blessed actors.

Yet time and again we fall for their troubled stories, while potentially dismissing some equally troubled lives in the real world.

It’s true that we let these fictional people into our houses on a daily or weekly basis. Sometimes we know more about their lives than perhaps we do our own friends. Through the magic of television we can get inside their heads and journey with them, sharing the ups and the downs, empathising, sympathising, hoping and dreaming along with them as they strive for whatever goals the writers have conjured up this particular episode.

If we are lucky, we do not know those who have met untimely, tragic deaths in reality. They are only a small picture on our computer screen, TV or newspaper, while a reporter tells us of their passing.

Yet is it simply that we care more for plot over people, or is it that we have become so desensitised to the horrors of real life that we are just more susceptible to fantasy? If so, you can understand it. In this day and age of news at your fingertips, we are confronted almost 24/7 with death, murder and injustice in the world. Who can blame us for getting caught up in an alternate reality?

Perhaps the media got it right last week and tapped into exactly what the public wanted and indeed needed. Mel’s death, after all, was written in such as way as to highlight a particularly relevant problem that has killed and injured many in real life. With the story continuing tonight, the coverage surely can’t hurt the cause.

But I can’t help thinking our need for such fictional news has been misjudged. I don’t think we’re there yet. I certainly hope we’re not there yet. Reaction to the storyline may have been strong, but at a time when others in the real world were grieving for actual loss, would it not have been more appropriate to limit the news coverage of what in the end was just entertainment?

Once upon a time I’d be able to appreciate the logic of caring more about the passing of a fictional person you thought you knew than that of someone in real life you did not.

But as a recent father, all I can think about now is how the parents of those poor boys felt last week, when, at an already difficult time, their sons’ stories were overshadowed by a television plot.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day
Get The Punch on Facebook

164 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Dan says:

      06:44am | 09/11/10

      It probably doesn’t hurt for people to get lost in their fantasies, but, according to Media Watch last night, Channel Seven news ran this event as a story EIGHT times!  Someone needs to get a grip.

    • Sarah says:

      08:24am | 09/11/10

      Did you say… a “news” program talked about a TV show’s plot? WTF?

    • mike j says:

      09:43am | 09/11/10

      Clearly not counting the number of plugs David Koch gets in on Sunrise.

    • Davida says:

      09:55am | 09/11/10

      Channel 7 should stop blurring the line between fantasy and news and focus on the real issues like Today Tonight’s report on Altyan from X Factor’s night in the cave.  Oh dear…..

    • The Badger says:

      10:32am | 09/11/10

      Davida
      and when they are successful, perhaps they can show News Ltd.  and Fox how to stop blurring the line between opinion and news.

    • Jeff says:

      12:00pm | 09/11/10

      The ultimate was Channel Seven News Perth’s 6pm bulletin - which failed to report the death of surfing champion Andy Irons (a real person) on the night they ran a four minute or so item on the death of a fictional character (Mel Rafter).

    • Ray says:

      12:42pm | 09/11/10

      No rocket science here. The media cross-promotes to maximise its investments. And, so called ‘real’ news, bores or frightgens the Bogan, so to maximise profits, the commercials give the Bogan what it wants.

      Media company profits are one thing, f you want a snapshot of the consequences of this for Australian society, have a look at mainstream America and be afraid, very afraid.

    • BK says:

      07:27am | 09/11/10

      That the character was so annoyingly arrogant made her death into a good news story.

    • Evan Muir says:

      07:28am | 09/11/10

      I agree, we’ve lost a sense of the important plot - our own and each other’s in the REAL world.

      The media should be obligated to impartially report on the real world and quit using ‘news’ as a tool to plug their programs and products. It’s deceiving, completely partial and flippn frustrating.

    • Joanney says:

      07:42am | 09/11/10

      It’s a goodam TV show people, get a grip!!!!

    • Judi says:

      06:08am | 10/11/10

      These are probably the same people who needed counselling because Pandora (from Avatar) isn’t real.  Apparently that was a real problem in some places too - people struck with grief because they couldn’t go & live amongst the sentient & glowing plants.

      Yes, I’ve been known to cry at a movie/tv serial death, but it was then & there, caught up in the moment I was watching, & that was it. No more after that. No grieving for the loss, no sleepless nights caused by the fact that someone on TV or a movie had died.

      Some people invest far too much of themselves into making tv serials (in particular) into part of their everyday lives.

    • MJ says:

      07:45am | 09/11/10

      I cried when Captain Kirk died. *shame*

    • Robert Smissen, rural SA, God's own country says:

      10:02am | 09/11/10

      I was shattered when Skippy bit the dust

    • Macca says:

      12:52pm | 09/11/10

      Mine was Nurse Roberts in Scrubs, but then Zach Braff did something silly and I was fine again

    • Pathetic says:

      01:49pm | 09/11/10

      Mine was Daniel Jackson from SG-1, but he came back to life so I’m all happy again

    • gg says:

      02:55pm | 09/11/10

      Mine was Nurse Roberts in Scrubs too. The actress who plays Carla was brilliant.

    • Kate says:

      03:30pm | 09/11/10

      When Cyril in OZ got his death sentence I cried for about fifteen minutes.

    • Lee says:

      07:44pm | 09/11/10

      Mine was Ronan Dex (the extremely buff guy with dreads) in Stargate Atlantis, not that he died for long before popping back to life. Not sure what made me cry most him dying or knowing it was the last episode of Atlantis and I couldn’t have my weekly perv.

    • antony says:

      11:16pm | 09/11/10

      My god….......Captain Kirks dead…............Nooooooooooooooooooooooo

    • St. Michael says:

      11:59pm | 09/11/10

      Optimus Prime in the animated Transformers movie, you tryhard mourners.  There was not a dry eye in the entire movie theatre when I saw it at the age of 14 or so.  Every fan remembers that, and it’s been 25 years since it screened.

    • Christine says:

      07:45am | 09/11/10

      This is way channel 7 overload. It has turned many of us off watching tonight’s programme. Get over it people, it’s only TV drama.

    • Tanya says:

      07:46am | 09/11/10

      Mel Doyle on Sunrise this morning actually said “we all need counselling after this”. Oh, PULEEZE! I’m all for counselling after a tragic situation, but if anyone is so affected by a TV show, they need to seriously reassess what is important in their life. Leave our (hopelessly inadequate) mental health system to deal with real emotional/psychiatric troubles, not television induced hyperbole!

    • Kate says:

      08:46am | 09/11/10

      That is unbelievable! Bit of an insult to people with legitimate mental health issues, I’d think.

    • Riley says:

      10:16am | 09/11/10

      I’m not surprised Mel Doyle said that…she is an air head and annoying. Pity she isn’t a television character and we could just kill her off….

    • Kelly says:

      11:42am | 09/11/10

      oh my kill mel Doyle off are you nuts she is real and I am sure that your comment will hurt her feelings. Yes it is a show and most people understand this dahhhh!!!! But when you watch a show every week you get to know the characters as if they are real , yes I found it sad its just human nature and yes I will be watching Packed to the Rafter’s tonight and everyother night it on. I am sure Mel Doyle did not in anyway say ” we need counseling after this” to insult anybody with mental issues. It happend years ago when Molly died on A Country Practice and it will continue to happen in the futur just get over it !!!

    • Dave says:

      11:49am | 09/11/10

      Maybe she was making a joke

    • McLovin says:

      12:32pm | 09/11/10

      No, Riley’s right - she’s an airhead and very bloody annoying. I personally would like to see the Weekend Sunrise crew take over. Andrew O’Keefe has what is missing from the Koch’s and Doyle’s out there - a personality.

    • Riley says:

      02:44pm | 09/11/10

      Yes I was making a joke, thank you Dave and McLovin..obviously I don’t wish her death just off the airwaves. Though it doesn’t really matter because I don’t watch that show because of her…she makes me want to stab my eyeball with a ice pick! I am sure she could not care one bit about my opinon of her. Although what right minded, grown up person says ‘we will need counselling over this’ about a fictional character?! does someone need to tell her that Mel is not real??
      I love Packed to the Rafters and yes I cried a bit when Ben found out she died but 10mins later I was fine because the moment was gone. I will be watching it tonight and shedding a tear then laughing with my boyfriend when it’s finished….

    • Scott says:

      07:47am | 09/11/10

      The reason is simple. A fictional character is someone we know, a person in the news is just a name. Sad, but true. I feel for the families of those that lose loved ones tragically, but the state of play is, we have no personal connetion to them. Mel was someone we watched on a weekly basis and someone we grew to know, as if one of our own.

    • Ing says:

      03:48pm | 09/11/10

      Also is the fact that there are many other people who died that day that didn’t even make it to the newspaper.  Some who noone probably even realised they’d died.  Sometimes real life gets tough, and we need a chance to take a break.  Plus, if the message of not using your phone whilst driving gets through, or that life doesn’t go on forever and we should talk to those who we love more often gets through, then thats good.  I know its hard to imagine, but if all we did all the time was focus on real life tradegies, as a society, we wouldn’t cope.  There is too much in this world thats bad, sometimes we need an out.  And thats ok.  The boys weren’t forgotten completely, and like I said, there are many more who wider society will never even know about.  But, if we knew about everyone, and never had a chance to deal with non-threatening crisises, well the world would likely collapse and be bloody depressing.

    • Donna says:

      07:24am | 10/11/10

      You are right Scott. How many of us see some of our family regularly? We meet at weddings, funerals, catch up & promise to keep in touch but hardly ever do so a show like this becomes ‘family’. We know more about them, enjoy their weekly dramas, form an opinion. We go up & down with their emotions, week in week out. That’s not to say that family isn’t important but the phone works in both directions so if they are concerned/interested in what I’m doing they can pick up the phone. One of our family ( I didn’t believe this at first ) has brought her children up to never make a phone call but to get their friends to phone them & this person also sends a Christmas card back the next year, simply crossing out ‘To” & ” From” & changing them over! True! Of course I am supposed to see the funny side of this, HA. She is definately off my Christmas list.

    • Suzy J says:

      07:50am | 09/11/10

      The crunch is in the last paragraph, a very sobering indictment of our society.  My heart and thoughts are with the Applebys

    • Marnie says:

      07:56am | 09/11/10

      The point is, we are human. We know the plot is fictional and the characters are actors, but we see ourselves in their lives.  Have you never lived in a small community and felt the devastation and pain of losing someone you barely knew? You feel the anguish of their family, their neighbours, their friends. The shock value is the same - there by the grace of God, go I.
      Every real tragedy is overshadowed by something meaningless to the family of the victim.  Those that know them will feel the same as the general community feels about the Rafter the death - shock and sadness.
      As for the sensationalism - Channel Seven are advertising their business and raking in the dollars and Punch is doing a great job in keeping it going.

    • Nicky says:

      01:37pm | 09/11/10

      Marnie, the point is, why can people not distinguish between fantasy & reality anymore? Psychologically, its a very important development step. When did the regression take place?

    • Debra says:

      08:04am | 09/11/10

      Could the fact be that we grieve for Mel and other fictional characters who die on screen, and not people we read have been killed be because these people are in our lounge rooms on telly every week for months..  We get to know these characters and when they die we feel a loss because we won’t see them again..  I feel for those who have lost their lives and their friends and families but you should get a grip on reality - if they are not in our faces and we don’t know them how can we grieve for them..  we can feel sad but not necessarily get upset by their misfortune….

    • Zeta says:

      08:07am | 09/11/10

      After much debate my houshold is a strictly Today Show only zone before work, and I remembered why when I accidently watched their Packed to the Rafters coverage on Sunrise this morning. Kochie and the other one were weeping.

      It was really weird to see a fictional character like David Koch crying about the death of another fictional character on a different TV show. Kind of like that one episode of Picket Fences that crossed over with the X-Files. Anyone else remember that? It had something to do with cow mutilation.

    • Ash says:

      09:09am | 09/11/10

      Um… sorry Zeta but David Koch isn’t a fictional character

    • Rev says:

      09:40am | 09/11/10

      Lol @ Ash…caught the slow bus this morning did we?

    • Hermano says:

      09:55am | 09/11/10

      Um… sorry Ash, but David Koch is no more real than Humphry B. Bear.

    • FFS says:

      09:59am | 09/11/10

      Umm Ash… you haven’t read one of Zeta’s comments before, have you?

    • Zeta says:

      10:29am | 09/11/10

      Kochie is a fictional character on the science fiction drama Sunrise based loosely on the Harlon Ellison novel I Have No Mouth But I Must Scream. The characters are all imprionsed within their own shared sub-conscious, which takes the form of a television studio, and after endless years of going slowly mad, tortured by their own sins before the world ended, they decide the only way to cling to sanity is to create a morning television show where they articulate their fears through fake ‘news’ broadcasts and infomercials about products they hope will enrich their meaningless, never ending lives.

      In contrast, Today on channel 9 is an off the wall comedy about a 30 something man child named Carl.

    • Zeta says:

      10:33am | 09/11/10

      Oh yeah and if anyone was interested, that Picket Fences / X-Files crossover episode was called Red Museum from Season 2 - it was about children being injected with Alien DNA as part of some end-of-the-world cult.

      Got me thinking - Picket Fences, The X-Files, Millenium, The Lone Gunmen and bizarely - Chicago Hope all had cross over episodes that mean they took place in the same consistent universe. How cool wouldn it be if more Australian shows did that? Like Neighbours has a cross over episode with Battlestar Galactica were it turns out one of them is a Cylon.

    • Rorie says:

      11:11am | 09/11/10

      Zeta, my hats off to you :D Made my day it did!

    • FFS says:

      11:27am | 09/11/10

      Aaaah, thanks Zeta. Best laugh I’ve had for days. I needed that, thanks again.

    • Missy Moo says:

      11:58am | 09/11/10

      Zeta, I don’t believe I have had the pleasure of reading one of your post; you have given me a huge laugh…still giggling, so thank you so very much.

    • Davida says:

      12:20pm | 09/11/10

      Thanks for articulating my long- held uneasiness about Sunrise/Today, Zeta.

    • St. Michael says:

      12:31pm | 09/11/10

      @ Zeta: I thought we’d already seen at least one BSG crossover with Neighbours.  None of the Bright Young Things on the latter show could possibly be human beings.

      However, I will also note happily that you have restored your nerd cred, with those careful bibliographical references to the X-Files.  I am now willing to forgive you for wrongly confusing Marines’ identities in Aliens some months ago. wink

      There’s even a little synchronicity there: Drake (Mark Ralston) actually played the cult leader in Red Museum.  All is interconnected!

    • Zeta says:

      01:37pm | 09/11/10

      @ St Michael - Mind = Blown.

      How’s this for scary - that episode, Red Museum, actually cites the date of the end of the world in The X Files as being December 22 2012, a date not mentioned again until the series ends. Red Museum aired in like, ‘95? A good decade before the Mayan Calender prophecy would sink into the collective sub-conscious. I mean, you’d have to be Terrence McKenna or that other bro who did heaps of shrooms to know that back then. There was no Wikipedias in 1995.

      Now, normally you could chalk that up to coincidence, but Chris Carter, the creator of the X Files, has an eerie knack for predicting the future - in 2001, months before the World Trade Centre attack, an episode of his short lived series The Lone Gunmen, a spin-off from the X Files, featured a conspiracy by the US Government to fly planes into the WTC as an excuse to start a war.

      I bet you’re feeling hungry right now, and that craving you have is for a mouthful of WTF.

    • St. Michael says:

      02:12pm | 09/11/10

      @ Zeta: WTF certainly was part of my initial response, although the words “are you smoking” were appended after it. wink

      Love your work. :D

    • Shifter says:

      02:12pm | 09/11/10

      @Zeta - I hope it’s Toadie.

    • R says:

      08:08am | 09/11/10

      I don’t think it’s that people care more about a fictional character, it’s because stories give us the opportunity to process our real emotions. Perhaps someone we knew died unexpectedly and we identify with what Ben Rafter is going through. Perhaps it allows us to imagine what it would be like to lose someone we love so that we ring mum that night to say, “I love you” or we make sure we say, “I’m sorry” to our partner before going to bed. For me, I lost someone I loved days before giving birth and then someone else I loved a month later so I never had a chance to grieve properly. Stories such as this give me an outlet to feel things that I never got to when it was actually happening. I think it says something important, not trivial, about ourselves as a society that we do care so much about this storyline.

    • Jo Hilder says:

      01:08pm | 09/11/10

      These arent stories, these are marketing and health promotion opportunities. Mel Rafter died because the scriptwriters sat around a table with some people who are paid to be concerned about the rising number of texting related accidents occuring on our roads. Like the big dude in The Green Mile put it “He keeled them with dere love”....its because we care that we cry, but its sorely misplaced emotion. One word…..Applebys, people.

    • Gerard says:

      07:43pm | 09/11/10

      R, your comment does not address the point- what is a manufactured storyline about fictional characters doing on the news? To be fair, it was on channel seven, a network which has admitted in court that the Today Tonight host is a ‘performer’ rather than a reporter, but surely even they must realise that portraying this as ‘news’ is blatent dishonesty?

      Seeing as channel seven are going down this route, why don’t they run a story on the destruction of Winston Smith’s capacity for logical thought? Now THAT would be worth reporting.

    • Donna says:

      10:36am | 10/11/10

      That’s a lovely comment from you & it puts it into perspective nicely.

    • Scarneck says:

      08:11am | 09/11/10

      I agree Dan, People and their fantasies are fine but when the media covers the story in their news section this becomes a worry. My local FM station ran this story on their news for days, I’ve never watched the show but after hearing it on the news so often I began to wonder - were the Rafters for real? I thought ‘what’s her name’ was an actor. how stupid of me, it must be a reality TV show about Pat Rafters family? Poor Pat, was it his Mother or Father?  how awful for Pat.

    • NicoleG says:

      12:53pm | 09/11/10

      You’re not the only one Scarneck. My dad was reading the paper and then starts telling me how tragic it was that this actress had died in a car accident. I tried, hopelessly, to tell him that she really didn’t die, her character in the show died. No, says dad, she really did die. She was moving to the US and she had a crash. It took me days to convince him. Over the top much?

    • Edward James says:

      08:20am | 09/11/10

      I hope I am not the only person who is annoyed at the level of cross media promotion which happens nowadays. In Mondays Telegraph we seen the same photo punch is running and the whole thing was run as NEWS. I am with Dan 08 44 am Get a grip. Or just wake up to your responsibilities. I do understand why they are TV guides and not programs any more. When i come home to a replay of the ” death scene episode”  don’t they understand we record programs so we can ditch ads!  Edward James

    • John says:

      09:12am | 09/11/10

      Agree whole heartedly, I no longer watch commercial news services because I was sick to death of seeing “news” about Dancing with the Stars on 7 Nightly News taking precedent over interest rate hikes or something to that level of importance. On all commercial news services you get less than 10 minutes worth of actual news. The rest is taken up with self promotion of other shows during the news, sport which is often covered twice, during the “news” part and then in the “sports” part. Followed by weather which runs for 3-4mins when all we all want to know is what the temperature will be for the next few days which takes 2 seconds to deliver.

      Thank god for internet news, I can just read what I want.

    • BobbyDan says:

      09:34am | 09/11/10

      Fictional or real people do mean something to many people. My case is that I live in a close knit town in Western Australia with a population of 9600+, nearly everone is related, works or has a social interaction with 90% of the population.
      In the last 9 months there have been 5 road deaths on the main road into the town. The media has reported these with graphic photos and opened the reports for public discussion. The main theme has been the unsafe condition of the road and the lack of funding for Police Patrols and upgrades of the road. But there have been outpourings of grief and notices of condolence to the bereaved.
      I had a personal interest in one of the deaths and was able to follow the event via the media rather than by facing the family and having to ask about how, why etc at that early stage.
      As a tennis fan the name Rafter rang bells so I followed the story and grieved with the family. Mondays paper had a Bill Smith in the Death Notices, I know several Bill Smiths and was relieved to see I did not know that one.
      The media plays a big part in informing us of what is happening and I thank it for doing it.

    • Col says:

      09:38am | 09/11/10

      I got so sick of TV 12 months ago I packed up the TV and put it in a cupboard and now read whatever news I want from the computer.

    • ChelseaLee says:

      10:55am | 09/11/10

      John - with all due respect, I would hardly even consider interest rate hikes to be news. There are floods and famine and people with actual news-worthy problems in the world. We watch half an hour of ‘Edna’s cat got stuck up a tree today’ and the like, and think that we’re well informed about the world.

      Today Tonight and all other similar ‘news’ programs are not news. They are 80% fear mongering, 19% entertainment, and 1% actual real news worth listening to. That is, of course, unless you’re interested in their new found ‘dodgy’ butcher or supermarket scam. Pffft. Whatever.

    • Kate says:

      01:00pm | 09/11/10

      @BobbyDan - this story is about a fake TV character from a fake TV family who ‘died’ in the show. Not former tennis player Pat Rafter and his real life family.

      In fact, the whole point of the article was that it’s pretty silly to put a fake TV character’s death in the news with more prominence than the real people you mention in your comment.

    • John Dark says:

      08:31pm | 09/11/10

      Inane suburbanites getting upset over the fictitious death of some silly cow in a show about ... inane suburbanites! Talk about an emotional circle jerk. How about watching something vaguely educational, or escapist even? Read a book? Talk to some REAL people? I’ll bet all these idiots are the same people who went silly over the deaths of Princess Diana and Micheal Jackson. You want escapist entertainment impact - Darth Vader being Luke Skywalkers’ dad, now THAT’S impact!

    • Charlie Chan says:

      08:42am | 09/11/10

      You can understand Channel 7 flogging it to death, but everyone else needs to take a reality check!

      As to why the public might feel more moved by Mel’s death than the deaths of real people, I think it’s easy to work out: they’ve come to know the TV character in greater depth than they’ll ever know about “real” people who’s deaths are covered by the 6pm news. They have a greater emotional tie to the TV character than to real victims, no matter how fictional the TV character is.

      And, of course, it’s a chick thing - girls just get sucked into Tv dramas grin

    • Lee says:

      07:51pm | 09/11/10

      Speak for yourself. I have no desire to ever what Packed to the Rafters or any episode of sex in the city. Not all girls get sucked into a TV Drama

    • jane says:

      09:10pm | 09/11/10

      This girl doesn not get sucked in to tv dramas, this girl finds less mindless shows to watch and is sick to death of the media reporting fantasy as reality.

    • Richard Andrews says:

      08:46am | 09/11/10

      I can’t believe the over reaction to the dumb show, who the hell cares? There are so many real issues we all face each day, and we get front page stories regarding this show, as if it was real. Talk about loosing the plot.
      It’s a Z rate show, watched by Z rate folk, with zero IQ.

      Rick A

    • Mel Rafter says:

      09:27am | 09/11/10

      Ok, well you obviously don’t watch the show and never intend to (because you must have such a high IQ). You can throw your two bob in but you have no merit calling it a Z rated show. I am pleased to see more Aussie TV on our screens, of course you’re probably busy watching more Two and a Half Men then you can poke your intellectual stick at.

    • dobbieb says:

      10:17am | 09/11/10

      Onya Richard. Spot On. A Zrate show watched by Z rate folk with zero IQ

    • Marto says:

      03:32pm | 09/11/10

      A show made by idiots, for idiots.  A simple message to all those sad piles of turd that have been hitting blogs to tell the world of their grief over a fictional TV show - identify yourselves so as we can arrange a group desexing in order to prevent further breeding of nutcases and the mentally handicapped into mainstream society.  If you watch commercial news and those current affairs tripe then you deserve what you get.

    • Richard Andrews says:

      04:55pm | 09/11/10

      I tell you Mel, Hell would have freeze over before I would watch non-entertainment like PTTR.
      I’m not trying to get a bit out of you, rather point out there are real issues in our world, & this is surely not one them.
      We now have our own version of that American trash ’ The Waltons ‘
      ” good night Mel ”

    • graeme2250 says:

      08:53am | 09/11/10

      This should be a reminder to all drivers that mobile phones and cars do not mix. Her husband should have known she would be driving at that time and should not have sent her a txt. The message here should be - don’t drive and txt or even think about your mobile while driving. But yet , we see it all too often when we are driving. Drivers on their mobile.

    • Richard Andrews says:

      10:06am | 09/11/10

      For Mel Rafter,

      Listen Clown, seemingly unlike you I live in the real world, maybe you should try it.
      I have far better things to do with time than watch mindless shows like the Rafters, 2 & half men.
      If caring about the really important issues in life is being intellectual, then I suggest you have lost the plot like all those making this empty issue into something life changing. I suggest they kill off the rest of the cast, & use the air time for something use full !

    • Mel Rafter says:

      11:54am | 09/11/10

      I know what you’re trying to do and you’re not going to get a bite out of me, Richard. Looking forward to curling up tonight with PTTR, a cuppa and a box of tissues.

    • Elizabeth says:

      12:10pm | 09/11/10

      Richard….why are commenting on such trivial things then? I mean with such an exceptional IQ, one would think that you would not be even reading this trash…..Listen Clown of thorns….you are IN THE REAL NASTY WORLD!!! Grow a brain!!!

    • Gerard says:

      08:11pm | 09/11/10

      Elizabeth, I think you’ll find that Richard was commenting on the loss of real journalism in Australia- hardly a trivial issue. If ‘news’ programs are more concerned with providing light entertainment than with keeping the public informed about what’s happening in the real world, how will powerful people making decisions that affect everyone ever be held to account? Bread and circuses…

    • Mother Rose says:

      09:04am | 09/11/10

      About the only thing better that Mel dying would have been if the writers had have taken her lame TV husband with her.
      Neither one of these “actors” can act and there should be some sort of award for worst character ever presented to Australian TV audiences.

    • Richard Andrews says:

      05:09pm | 09/11/10

      For Elizabeth.
      Listen you small minded Goose, I made no comment regarding my IQ,
      if you are unable to comprehend what I was getting at, then I say it again,
      A mindless show, for mindless people, as I said there are real issues in our world and they shouldn’t be confused with a empty TV show.
      Only someone who possesses such a NASTY ATTITUDE such as yours, would have to make such a cheep shot. You are a NON PERSON !

    • Embarresed says:

      09:06am | 09/11/10

      It’s really comes as no surprise that for the real News, quality journalism and current affairs the ABC and SPS surpass these commercial stations advertorials!

    • Gerard says:

      08:19pm | 09/11/10

      What’s really scary is that if you want news, you have to get it from media outlets controlled by the government. And Conroy’s (read: Gillard’s) internet censorship program isn’t even in effect yet.

    • DK says:

      09:17am | 09/11/10

      I also find it strange and upsetting that anyone watches this rubbish show.

    • Randall says:

      09:18am | 09/11/10

      Now if only The Bold and Beautiful would kill off Brooke and Ridge!!

    • Mark says:

      10:51am | 09/11/10

      problem is if B&B killed off Brooke and Ridge, they’d be back from the dead withing a month and giving them even more story lines to keep the show running for another 20 years - haha

    • MarK says:

      11:02am | 09/11/10

      They would just get a head transplant or something and be right back in 18 months as if nothing happened

    • Aitch B says:

      12:47pm | 09/11/10

      In 18 months nothing WOULD have happened!!

    • Shifter says:

      02:18pm | 09/11/10

      Isn’t Ridge 80 years old or something by now?

    • Lee says:

      07:53pm | 09/11/10

      I vote for Taylor and Stephanie if she hasn’t died already

    • Richele says:

      09:18am | 09/11/10

      It was upsetting because it was so relatable. And we don’t get as emotional over real life Australians dying because we only hear or read about it. If we were to witness the event, as we did Mel’s death, I’m sure emotions would run high.

    • Fair Go says:

      09:26am | 09/11/10

      The plots in TV shows are designed to be relatable to audiences. That’s why a show like Rafters is so popular because people are able to relate to the situations the family is put through. It’s also why the death on the show has affected a lot of people because they can relate to the loss of a loved one and how they would feel walking down that lonely, cold hallway to identify the body. When it comes to real life stories such as the death of the boy on the Central Coast, I doubt anyone wouldn’t feel for the family but many who aren’t parents would have no idea what it would actually feel like. The media knows this and taps into it by producing lead stories about popular shows because they know it will get reader numbers up. That’s why celebrity gossip runs on the front page while soldiers dying and actual news only make page 5.

    • Peta says:

      09:27am | 09/11/10

      Its a sad reflection on the times we live in, I have often been commenting these days on how cheap and expendable human life seems to be murders and horrible tradegys get no airtime, then I flick to a news station to see tiger woods affair or even worse middle class australias distress over a tv character dying.
      Is everybody that disenchanted with there lives that there only emotional outlet is to sit in front of a box everyweek and pretend they are involved in an imaginary story, its sad.

      Go get to know your neighbours call a friend talk to your children walk the dog, it a TV show affects people this strongly its time there were some changes made.

      My thoughts are also with the family of M Appleby that picture of him smiling still makes me sader than any fictional characters death and any of you with sons, brothers cousins should make you feel this way also.

    • Nathan says:

      09:33am | 09/11/10

      Personally, I have never watched the show but I would guess that the reason why people care more about those who die in a TV show as opposed to real life is because they have become attached to the characters in the show.  Television (and films also) is deliberately written as such to hook you in, to get you involved in the character’s life.  I believe the reason why people tend not to care as much about real life tragedies is not because they’re insensitive, but simply because these victims are total strangers to them whereas the characters on the screen are not.

    • Jess says:

      09:39am | 09/11/10

      Mel’s death was the catalyst to make me cry, but it was me picturing losing my own family and friends that had me sobbing

    • Nay Nay says:

      09:39am | 09/11/10

      Thank you Scott and Marnie for being reasonable and logical enough to see the truth and reality of why people feel connected to a fictional character on TV. It’s our EMOTIONS that connect us to it.. and why even compare a tv show’s sensationalism / advertising to the awful tragedy and gut wrenching sorrow of real deaths in the first place? The two just don’t belong in the same category. Entertainment is part of news today cos we choose to make it a part of our lives… so what? Why put such a good show down or their characters just because you personally didn’t like it or them? Nothing will ever explain the tragedy of death and how everything else next to it appears so trivial and insulting, no matter what the subject. Maybe we could just learn to live with it and get a grip on THAT?

    • Gerard says:

      08:54pm | 09/11/10

      Thanks for your comment Nay Nay. You’ve done an excellent job of missing the point.

      What Dan was saying is that you CAN’T compare a TV show’s sensationalism/advertising (i.e. bullshit) to news. That’s why it doesn’t belong on a program purporting to be news. No one is putting the show or its characters down, simply stating that they should remain on the show and not be reported as real life events that actually effect real people.

    • Clare says:

      09:42am | 09/11/10

      People get worked up about it because it is not real and it doesn’t cost them anything in real emotional terms. In real life it is very hard to be with people who experience these things, on TV it is pseudo emotion….you can even pause and go and get a beer if you like.

    • Smell the roses says:

      09:50am | 09/11/10

      I’m not a “chick” and I’m not an idiot! My wife and I enjoy the sweet humour and grace of “Rafters”. We think that the makers of the show get suburban Australian life pretty right (yes it is idealised) and do a decent job of exploring some very real themes too. I happen to think its a testament to art and fantasy that we get “sucked” into caring for fictional characters. So can I encourage all you rationalists out there to get a life, smell the roses, chill out and not take life so seriously. My ability to “grieve” for Mel Rafter does not rule out my ability to empathise and sympathise with those who have lost people in sad real life situations.

    • Riley says:

      10:25am | 09/11/10

      The smartest comment on here….very well said!

    • Angela M says:

      10:39am | 09/11/10

      I think shows such as the Rafters are a great opportunity to escape the harsh reality of life and remember for a short time that the majority of people do treat each other with love and respect and that family should always be important.  The reality dished up on TV is often disheartening, with many families shown as dysfunctional, young children bashed or killed by their own parents, teenagers die through drinking and driving or making bad choices, or involvement in drugs, or take their own lives because ‘reality’ is too confronting.  Road rage is rampant, the use of the ‘f’ word frequent, lack of respect everywhere and elderly people bashed or raped by sick people.  The Court systems fail us and murderers and rapists are given a second chance or a rap over the knuckles.  There is not enough attention given to the type of people portrayed by the ‘Rafters’ - normal, humorous, loving, supportive of each other through good and bad.  I too shed a tear for Mel Rafter - I wish there were more shows like it.  Good luck to Zoe in her future career.

    • Gerard says:

      08:58pm | 09/11/10

      Smell the roses, if you think that there is any justification for reporting this non-event on a program that millions of bogans consider ‘news’, then yes, you are an idiot.

    • Sonrahjacksar says:

      09:57am | 09/11/10

      People are still going on about this? People really need to stop living vicariously.

    • ImaWestie says:

      01:06pm | 09/11/10

      Of course they are, Dan’s been paid to plug tonights episode. Coverage like this doesn’t “just happen” you know!

    • Geoff says:

      10:04am | 09/11/10

      I like the majority of Australians don’t watch “Rafters”, never have never will, just not interested.  BTW I stopped watching “Lost” after the first season…  it was quite obviously, going nowhere.

    • 14/11/04 says:

      10:10am | 09/11/10

      I don’t watch this show, but by chance when channel flicking last night, I happened upon the repeat at exactly the moment she was driving and soon to crash, so I watched on. I have to say, I wasn’t that moved by it. The scene with the cast doing the ‘slow mode’ walk down the hospital corridor was just awful, such tackiness. Nothing much about it was believable.
      I have first hand experience at the tragic unexpected death of a loved member of the family, so I cannot be accused of being heartless or naïve. Perhaps that’s why this glorification of a death is so entertaining, it’s nothing like the reality of it and so many are yet to know the truth. Equally, whilst we might feel sorry for the family of Matthew Appleby, most of us can’t know what they are going through, we can only imagine. If my experience is anything to go by, they won’t look anything like the Rafter family. People should enjoy their soaps by all means, but lets not ever forget that its fiction and should not be misplaced with real life or the news.

    • Peter says:

      10:15am | 09/11/10

      Am I the only person in Australia that doesn’t watch this show??
      For the people who are “grieving” for the character who ‘died’..... get a life and get a bloody grip on reality. Watch a show like RPA and see *real* people, in *real* life, in *real* life and death situations.
      The character who ‘died’ is off to America to “make her fortune”..... so you’ll see her back on another Aussie soap opera within 12 months.

    • Grumpy says:

      10:16am | 09/11/10

      So then how much did Channel 7 paying you to write this?

    • BigScotty says:

      10:17am | 09/11/10

      The reason is simple. Because the Australian public, by and large, are idiots.

    • Tails says:

      10:29am | 09/11/10

      If they played Fix You by Coldplay while they reported on real life deaths, we’d probably cry more while watching the news.

    • Stig says:

      10:34am | 09/11/10

      Although I’ve never watched the show and just presume that it is just as amateurish and puerile as the other rubbish produced by the commercial channels, I can imagine that people getting caught up in the show are just empathising with the characters the way a person would with a novel. I doubt whether they have lost their grip with reality and that this means to them more than a real death or event.

    • Budz says:

      10:38am | 09/11/10

      Why are more people sad about a tv character dying than a real life person? Well it’s actually quite simple, all of the people that are sad feel like they knew the person, even though it was on TV. While the random teenagers who died in NSW is just another random person dying, and we hear about it nearly every day. It’s about being able to relate to the person too.

    • Paul Horn says:

      10:40am | 09/11/10

      It’s just a shame that the entire cast of this perverted show did not suffer the same fate. In fact better still if it had been real rather than on TV land! 
      More useless people with nothing to offer society prancing around desperately seeking fame and a “oi look at me, look at me” lifestyle!

      Now if only the same fate could be engineered for the moronic masses that view this tripe the nations collective IQ would jump by 100 points!

      Have a nice day

    • Lee says:

      07:58pm | 09/11/10

      Paul you just have to remember 50% of the population is below average intelligence. If shows like this keep them happy and calm it lets the other 50% can get on with life

    • Yawn says:

      10:53am | 09/11/10

      This is well and truly pathetic. People need to get a life!

    • Ross says:

      11:06am | 09/11/10

      After watching 4Corners last night and Media Watch. and Q&A .I will also greeve for the barren 3 months or so till they reapear. However with all the cross promotion on the news and Sunrise with Humfry B Kosh I am over it allready to hell with the rafters.

    • ChelseaLee says:

      03:54pm | 09/11/10

      Ross, I have been in a foul mood all day, but Humphrey B Koch - that is the funniest thing I’ve read and now I can’t stop laughing. Thanks!

    • ibast says:

      11:31am | 09/11/10

      From discussion with people with friends and colleagues about TV show in generally I’m suprised by how much people invest in the plot emotionally.  They talk about the events of these shows almost in the first person.

      I think morning and afternoon radio DJs share the same power unfortunately.  They form part of peoples lives.

    • Bugalug says:

      11:33am | 09/11/10

      Perhaps we need to have labelling laws for news similar to those used to distinguish between ‘fruit juice’ and ‘fruit drink’.  Time slot needs to contain 100% real news else it’s called ‘Advertorial’, to use Embarresed’s term.  I sometime wonder why 7 bothers calling their programs ‘news’ and ‘current affairs’.  Call it what it is, cross-promotion and snake oil sales, the punters who watch these shows probably could not care less.

    • BJA says:

      11:40am | 09/11/10

      Zoe Ventoura is smoking hot!!

    • ibast says:

      12:03pm | 09/11/10

      Yes and she had the only palatable character in the show, but her agent should be a bit more honest with her about her acting ability before she flies out.

    • R says:

      12:53pm | 09/11/10

      ibast, she’s been out once before on a break from filming and due to the positive reaction she got, she decided to make the move. Rumour is that we might see her on Entourage.

    • Cate P says:

      11:44am | 09/11/10

      I had precisely the same thought listening to the news this morning; the NEWS (!) story of the impending fictional funeral juxtaposed with a few seconds reporting the the death of an old lady who was only discovered to be dead when a carer visited to check the welfare of her disabled son.  Not one person appearing to care for the old lady who had obviously devoted her life to caring for her son; and millions weeping over a soapie fiction.  Pretty tragic stuff.

    • Bella says:

      12:18pm | 09/11/10

      If there’s a market, the media will provide it!  Australia is turning into the US and it’s cringeworthy!!!!!

    • LJ says:

      12:18pm | 09/11/10

      How Baudrillardian of you Dan, the simulation has indeed taken precedence over the real. Welcome to life in postmodern society.

    • Kerri Doherty says:

      12:20pm | 09/11/10

      Since we first started viewing movies & TV shows and even before that
      through books we have felt attachment to fictional characters. Empathy is
      a healthy and very strong emotion in some humans.  Given the violence,
      aggression, bullying and inhumanity that we see going on around us in the world at large, I see very little to worry about when people are experiencing this very positive human emotion.  We can’t spend all our time immersed in
      “the serious issues”. There are far too many people in this world already
      victims of “the black dog”.

    • Gerard says:

      09:15pm | 09/11/10

      Kerri, how many shows on TV report on “the serious issues”? I’ll give you a big hint: there aren’t any on the commercial networks. There were a lot of people in Zimbabwe complaining about all the emphasis on “the serious issues” about fifteen years ago…

    • Greenhouse says:

      12:23pm | 09/11/10

      This is just crazy.
      we have become a disconnected community where it has become easier and preferable to fulfill our social requirements by watching others interact rather than participating ourselves.
      Teenagers and 20 somethings know no other way. What of the next generation?? At this point the question needs to be asked….Do we have any real need to have any personal contact with others at all?

    • St. Michael says:

      02:17pm | 09/11/10

      Come on, Greenhouse, admit it.  You shed many tears when Molly died on “A Country Practice”, didn’t you?

    • Bryan says:

      12:41pm | 09/11/10

      Creativity a good story line and good acting can make (some) people feel and belive just about anything. The fact that media is now a science and something that can be used to manipulate just about anything from enhancing the bad boy (or girl) image of misbehaved actors to coaching and prompting bulldusting politicians is the scary thing.

      For all those that have lost loved ones, the feelings are deep and private and the manipulation of these feelings to a point of becoming desensitized to the real thing is something we should all be concerned with. It appears that everything from mini masterchefs to the huge beatups on the current affairs shows that we see nightly, hunger more and more for that reality feel.

      For goodness sake, there is a difference between reality and acting and the sooner we learn not to mix up the two the better.

    • Christine says:

      12:50pm | 09/11/10

      OMG!!!  I remember when Molly died on A Country Practice.  It was so sad and I cried.  I also cried then they put down Old Yella.  I was 5 or 6 at the time and the morning matinee was packed with sniffling kiddies.

    • Nigel No Mates says:

      12:50pm | 09/11/10

      And I thought I had taken all the funny pills…I find it sad, cheesy, and just wrong that people out there including my wife cried…and then cried again with the second showing of this fictional rubbish.

    • Stef says:

      12:51pm | 09/11/10

      I think it’s a little unfair to judge people who watch these fictional shows and get upset.  I cry everytime a fictional character dies because it brings back memories of when my father died.  But I do think it is a bit over the top for this to overshadow real deaths in the newspapers.

    • Here Today says:

      01:02pm | 09/11/10

      I don’t watch Rafters - and after this, I doubt I’ll watch anything on Seven ever again. I don’t mind people watching their soapies - I have mine too - but soapie story lines are not “news” and using a network news programme to publicise your plot line devalues the news service by robbing it of credibility.
      So all this goes to prove where Seven’s priorities are, and it’s not with integrity of news. Bye Bye Seven - back to Nine we go.

    • TheRealist says:

      01:06pm | 09/11/10

      This reflects the “shallow” World a lot of people exist in today.
      They have very few morals, no respect for self or others, no motivation to “lie life” and expect to be kept by parents or grand parents.
      I’m not a fan of War, but this generation needs a swift boot up the arse to shake them into life.  Most of them live in a “false World.”
      Brace yourselves for change people; because change is coming in a BIG way sometime soon.
      Oh, google “Common Purpose” and see how you are all being manipulated…

    • Edward James says:

      01:07pm | 09/11/10

      Advertisers have a lot to answer for. The evidence of cross media promotion is right here in front of us with this Dan hanks by line. There will be people who have read or commented on this string who will watch Packed to the Rafters and some who will be hooked. It is Australian made pop corn for the mind. Hands up, who remembers The Sullivan’s or Division 4 ? Unfortunately main stream seems to be considered NEWS as entertainment and the lines of communication have become blurred.  Art will imitate life for as long as the public continue indirectly to pay the piper by absorbing the advertising which props all this up. Edward James

    • Nicky says:

      01:39pm | 09/11/10

      What type of bubble is being lived here in Australia that the distinction between reality & fiction is so blurred & such trauma results from fiction?

      To everyone who says, its because we see these “people” every day in our living rooms, perhaps less emotional investment should be put into tv programmes and more should be put into real life?

    • Steve says:

      01:47pm | 09/11/10

      It is a sad state of affairs in the world when people are grieving for a fictional charecter on a tv show and that it all gets reported on the news as though it’s news. Personaly I dont watch a lot of Australian procduced television shows most of it is drivel except for RUSH.

    • sneakers says:

      01:51pm | 09/11/10

      Seriously, people watch Channel 7?

      I’ve seen the effect it’s had on people around me .. trying to talk to them is like trying to talk to cheese.

    • St. Michael says:

      02:15pm | 09/11/10

      ...smelly, generally happens in refrigerators, and goes well on pasta?

    • Marto says:

      03:45pm | 09/11/10

      ...Gold!

      It’s an easy way to sort out the ‘tards when introduced to new people.  Ask them what shows they watch on TV and if there are more than 2 FTA commercial networks in there then you can safely assume that they are not worth talking to any further.

      Combine that with the overload of reality TV created to keep the Gen Y spastics happy…...

    • Mem says:

      02:27pm | 09/11/10

      Speaking of cross-reference selling of their commercial cr@p, try watching the cricket on Ch9 - drives me insane when they push their shows on that format. Going to start turning the sound down and the ABC radio on - far better coverage! We are meekly being turned into vacuous robots!

    • Destry says:

      02:30pm | 09/11/10

      So, the deaths of real Aussies should replace the death of TV characters in the Entertainment news?

    • Steve Smith says:

      06:01pm | 09/11/10

      Don’t confuse entertainment news for cross promotion.

    • Nicole says:

      02:32pm | 09/11/10

      The reason that we are far more interested in the lives (and deaths) of the Rafters as opposed to the deaths of two ‘real’ people is that we feel we actually ‘know’ Mel Rafter. We had no prior attachment to those other boys, and although their families will feel grief in real life, we get that simulated sense from the ‘relationships’ we have developed via our television screens.

    • Megan R says:

      02:34pm | 09/11/10

      I got excited when I heard it was someone called Mel on channel 7. Alas, wrong Mel.

    • Hank van Essen says:

      02:38pm | 09/11/10

      1000% right. There are people out there tha are so addicted to this type of show. I found my self watching a few episodes of “number 96” and realised that I had my own life to live.

    • craig says:

      02:57pm | 09/11/10

      Why is it that the ‘real life’ brigade are always so quick to show contempt?  Surely being above TV Drama also includes maturity and respect.

    • Carly says:

      03:10pm | 09/11/10

      lmao at the people who think they had a choice! The media force feeds this crap to you…you do NOT decide. That is what the internet is for…for you to decide what and when you watch…tv is run by fat white agenda pushing profit monkeys!

    • Somewhere over the rainbow says:

      03:10pm | 09/11/10

      Agreed. So sad.
      I can’t believe the hype.
      Never seen the show. Don’t really care.

      I care more about real news than this drivel.

      Real People died, but you wouldn’t think it considering a fiction person got more coverage. What is up with that?
      There is something terribly wrong there.

      Condolences to the real families who experience real life tragedies.

      This makes me sad in the same way, so much is emphasised on celebrities for just being celebrities, and yet Haiti is going through a Cholera Epidemic as well as Pakistan. So many other world issues.

    • edwina says:

      03:28pm | 09/11/10

      i can’t speak for everyone else, and I agree it was probably given too much coverage, but I have to disagree in regards to people being so upset seeing such a scene on TV. I had tears in my eyes- not because some character was going to die- but seeing that in front of you hits home what such a scene would be like if it happened to you. Not only did it show how easy it is to die like that, but the scenes after- the police coming to the door, the identification at the morgue- that is the stuff of my worst nightmares and something I never hope to experience. This story can be related to by so many Australians who have lost loved ones in car crashes, or in accidents generally. Please don’t be so quick to judge and assume everyone who got upset about this are shallow just because they wont see one of their favourite characters on tv again. It is reality coming to life on the screen that affects many of us emotionally.

    • Em says:

      04:31pm | 09/11/10

      I don’t think we (as a viewing audience) value the lives of fictional characters more than real people. It’s simply because we’ve come to “know” the characters stories and invested our time in watching them live their lives. It’s a loss of the familiar.

      I see a picture of a family brutally murdered and think, “Oh my goodness, that’s bloody awful…” but there’s not a lot more I can say. Do I know these people? No. Sorry, but I don’t know them from soap.  With Rafters, I can go “OMG! Lisa’s dead! Oh no!” and cry because I know more about her and see her story played out in front of me, regardless of the fact that she’s completely fictional.

      For the record, I don’t watch Rafters but I felt the same when my favourite CSI character died. After investing years in watching him, I was crushed.  It’s not hard to put yourself there.

    • fake fake fake says:

      06:21pm | 09/11/10

      Good one Dan. I used to love watching films for the ‘emotional releases’ and ‘art imitating life.’ Now I abhor these emotional roller coasters and can’t think of more of a waste of time than watching other people’s lives instead of living my own. Fake fake fake.

    • Karl says:

      06:57pm | 09/11/10

      Get a grip people.

    • Steve says:

      08:11pm | 09/11/10

      Maybe I should be in mourning over the fact that I’ve never watched the show, since it’s apparenlty better and more important than real life.

    • John Dark says:

      08:15pm | 09/11/10

      Just proves once again that a person may be smart, but people - collectively - are morons. When I become God-Emperor everyone’s viewing habits will be tracked and those who watch tripe like this as well as brain dead ‘reality’ TV will be turned into plant fertiliser, since it’s about the only thing they’re good for. Unfortunately the media caters to morons because there are so many of them, and this tyranny of the masses is what is creating the latter-day decadence reminiscent of the decline of the Roman Empire, what with all the bread and circuses. The Disposable Heroes of Hiphoprisy nailed it when they updated Karl Marx with “Television is the drug of a nation”.

    • Beep Me says:

      08:25pm | 09/11/10

      I cried for the boy who was shot in front of his mother and little brother and mourned his death for a couple of days.

      I don’t watch that mindless soap on a rope Rafters.  The 20 mins I caught one ep was a showcase of acting worse than that of Home and Away - and that’s saying something.

    • V says:

      08:27pm | 09/11/10

      It’s the direct consequence of the consolidation of media companies. You’ll find things such as this are plugged from morning/afternoon radio, to the newspaper, breakfast TV news, regular news, in the middle of cricket commentary and on and on ...

      On the other hand, a good distraction for the sheeple, rather than spend time seeking in-depth knowledge about some of the larger issues in broader society.

    • JB says:

      10:18pm | 09/11/10

      I also have never watched the show.  Judging by the number of comments, clearly its having an impact. 

      I’m sure that the station will be well pleased that so many people feel the need to express an opinion (myself included).  Rregardless of whether they watch the show or not most people now know what the most recent episodes included and may tune in to ‘see what the fuss is about’ just what the station wants!!  I will be not be one of them.

    • Stace says:

      10:29pm | 09/11/10

      The fact is, it’s hard to get emotional and care about people you don’t know. We are made to feel that we know these fictional people, in books and movies as well as television, and their loss becomes emotional. I cried when Dumbledore died, but when a stranger is murdered it’s just a reflection of what society has come to. And I think that’s natural - we can’t be expected to have a genuine emotional reaction to every single calamity reported in the news; we’d never stop weeping.

    • schmemmm says:

      11:20pm | 09/11/10

      Just because something gets airtime on the news doesn’t mean that people care less or more about it and how other people react to that personal loss doesn’t say anything about that person who died or their life. If we are all equally valuable then why judge a persons emotional intelligence and scorn them? How is there anything wrong with people having emotions when they see fictional characters go through something tough? Writers are using life experiences to discover these characters, actors are using their emotions to bring them to life, and the person who perceives the experiences whether real or fictional are reacting the way that they do because of their life experiences and the unique makeup that makes them themselves. Most of us do not know the person on the news who tragically may have crossed over as you yourself as a writer of this article do not know the people who cry during a television show, or the impact watching it will make on their life. So why judge their experiences as wrong? Their experiences are what they are, we are in a free will zone and what you do not have is insight into their personal emotions, why or if they cried when real people died or what these shows and the people in them reflect and mirror for them in their own lives.
      For all you know they may send prayers for many families they have never met going through a hard time, but this has nothing to do with whether they also cried when a fictional character died. Should we preach compassion for one set of people whilst judging others for being themselves? Our emotions are our own to experience as we do and they tell us many messages that are personal to ourselves.

    • Taxpayer says:

      04:30am | 10/11/10

      I am with you, Suzi J. Looking at this post, it makes me so sad that people did not find it appropriate to send message of condolances to Appleby family but so many commented and cried on this trash.
      Sad state of affairs.

    • Lucky Phil says:

      06:08am | 10/11/10

      I cried when I saw the Oz Lotto numbers.

    • vanilla says:

      06:41am | 10/11/10

      Someone here hit the nail on the hdea when they commented that:

      “When it comes to real life stories such as the death of the boy on the Central Coast, I doubt anyone wouldn’t feel for the family but many who aren’t parents would have no idea what it would actually feel like.”

      Being able to emotionally put yourself in the position of a real person enduring a tragedy is called compassion. Watching a fictional TV show in order to have your emotions manipulated, thats apprently what passes for entertainment.

      We have lost compassion, and replaced it with what amounts to emotional wanking.

    • Stevem says:

      08:51am | 10/11/10

      Quite a simple answer as to why we take a fictitious death to geart over something more real. A tv character is someone that has become part of our lives. You live with them through watching that program and you become attached to them in someways like your family and friends. A random being murdered out there which you have no connection to will not have the same effect. Really think about it.

    • R says:

      08:50am | 11/11/10

      Loved last night’s episode too smile

    • TheLostThing says:

      03:00pm | 14/11/10

      I still don’t understand why this was such a shocking death or why it was talked about all over. Characters die in T.V shows all the time, Why is her death more important or sad than any other one thats happened on T.V? And why is Mel’s death so shocking its all over the news and being talked to death?!?!? (excuse the pun) Its all Fake for one and two WHO CARES??!!?!

      Is it because its more realistic that you or someone you know could die like that as apposed to in a bomb exposition or murder or some other storyline used in another soap to kill of a character?

      That fact this happened not long after the character got married is such an old tale….noone that gets married on a soapy gets to live very long. Look at Neighbours recently , , only about a month before Mel died on Rafters there was a death on Neighbours. The character of Ringo had only been married for a couple of weeks before he got killed off. In fact in an older neighbours ep Di didn’t even make her honeymoon before she was knocked off.

      Its just what they do. To make them get married and live happily ever after would be an end to all there storylines and be boring. They even have a affair or die, simple.

      The only time I got upset over a soap character dying was in an All Saints storyline. Not long after she got married the character of Erica went missing and was found murdered.  I was sad, not because Erica was dead but the actor who played her husband in the show, was dead.  Mark died in real life and I knew they were scenes filmed hours before he died. Thats really sad. Not some fake car crash like what happened on Rafters.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter