A lot of my comrades on the Left of politics are walking around as if the ascension of Tony Abbott is an early Christmas present, but I’m not so sure.
While some see the rise of the Mad Monk as the Tory version of Latham’s 2004 election car crash, I think the risk is we are gearing up for a re-run of the 1999 Republic referendum.
That was the ballot where Abbott, as executive director of the ‘No’ vote managed to convince battlers to keep the Queen as Head of State because the alternative would be to have the nation run by a bunch of wankers - like Malcolm Turnbull. A decade later and the Left is still coming to terms with the anti-elite backlash that the Republic Referendum – and arguably the 2001 Tampa election – unleashed.
And my growing concern is that a similar dynamic is at play with the climate change debate, now chrystalised into a meaningless acronym, the ETS.
Take this exchange with a Labor-voting cabbie last week:
“Bloody Rudd and his ETS – all he’s going to do is increase power prices; the poor pensioners won’t be able to afford it. And who says we need to pay more? Bloody scientists, that’s who. What would they know – all they’ve ever done is gone to uni”.
These sentiments show the fertile ground an Abbott scare campaign on the ETS has to work with: not just the personal cost embodied in the mantra ‘a new tax’; but the backlash against people from uni telling us what to do.
While Kevin Rudd and Penny Wong refer to the expert advice; Abbott will not engage on the science – he will go after the scientific community as ideologically driven tossers working in league with the phoneys from Canberra.
And for those who want action, he will unleash the nuclear bogey – saying if you are serious about clean energy you will embrace a proven ‘clean energy’ source.
Again this will unleash a backlash from those (like me) who have spent decades opposing nuclear energy, which Abbott will anger dismiss as concerns of the latte drinking set (even though I’m a double mac man).
Can the Coalition prosecute a climate change campaign on ordinary folks verses the elites?
Polling conducted over the last week by Essential Research shows Abbott has a little to work with.
By running the centre line, Rudd and Labor have failed to garner widespread support. In fact, given the choice between Labor’s ETS, the Greens coal denial approach and Abbott’s climate change denial, Abbott is the most popular – apart from the perennial winner in this debate ‘Don’t Know’
With the seismic shift in the political landscape, the big question now is how Labor will respond:
Option A would be to run an Australian Republic Movement style – ‘we know best’ – campaign, where scientific experts are lined up to stomp on the growing band of deniers. This approach will play into Abbott’s hands and could well be disastrous.
An Option B will be to take the time to explain the ETS and how it works (something that hadn’t happened to date) and show the economic benefits of moving first, especially around the creation of renewable industries. The problem is this requires patience and cut through in the face of sustained heckling,
Option C would be to match fear with fear – blame Abbott and Barnaby for the drought, for the destruction of the Barrier Reef, for every thunderstorm between now the next election. This story portrays the government as acting because the current economic base of carbon is unsustainable – ads like the coal mining union ran before the last federal lection illustrate how this can be done.
Finally Option D: would be to attack Abbott and the Tories head on and paraphrase the great Victor Richardson during the Bodyline series : “Which of you wankers are calling these wankers a wanker?” Under this scenario, Labor’s job would be to move the debate away from climate change and onto industrial relations, where Abbott’s determination to bring back WorkChoices clearly has him in the camp of the top-end of town.
Whichever path Labor takes, the Liberals have thrown the game wide open by appointing Tony Abbott leader – it’s now up to Labor to show the same diligent attitude to politics as they have been showing to policy over the past 12 months.
Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day
Facebook Recommendations
Read all about it
Punch live
Up to the minute Twitter chatter
TAbbott to fight PHI rebate cuts on behalf of 2.5 million to pay extra, but won't say what he'd do as PM. http://t.co/lXWpMXXF
Numerous workplace safety rules (no harness, fall arrest etc) broken in this pic of Roosters coach Brian Smith http://t.co/jx4PgtBs
Yo, mummy bloggers! Your expert input is required in this doozy of a child-rearing dilemma http://t.co/0JfOnCq1
Recent posts
The latest and greatest
Would you kill for a job?
Who would work in an abattoir? Most of us have done jobs we didn’t want to do because we needed…
Friday Dilemma: child cruelty or harmless fun?
Parenting. It’s the new oneupmanship. Ah, how quaint the days now seem when parents could raise…
Hipsters with hip replacements
Someone once told me that when people reach a certain age they begin dressing in the manner they did…
Nosebleed Section
choice ringside rantings
From: Punch on: Open thread 09/02/2012
marley says:
I'm one of the older ones, so I've certainly seen a few changes in my time. When I started school I learned to write with a nib pen, dipped in an inkwell (no, I'm not kidding). My mother became a dab hand at getting inkstains out of my clothes. Flicking ink at one another in the classroom was an essential… [read more]From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics
Erick says:
Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]Gentle jabs to the ribs
No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops
Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more
Most commented