Andrew Bolt is concerned. Frankly, he’s quite beside himself. As if he didn’t have enough to worry about with the endless squawking from the Doomsday Brigade and their so-called ‘scientists’ fretting about ‘climate change’, when everyone knows it’s naturally occurring heat and why on earth should anyone – let alone large, multinational corporations run by hard-working, faceless billionaires whose fortunes have been built on the back of corporate environmental irresponsibility – have to apologise for that?

And don’t even get him started on the gross incompetence of the Federal Government.. Honestly, sometimes it’s just like beating his head against a brick wall. Is he the only one who cares about this godforsaken country?

But now they’ve gone and given him something else to bite his nails about. You know who ‘they’ are. The stalking, predatory creatures with nothing but lust on their minds and the sweet scent of young flesh propelling them forward.

The trussed-up, pumped-up, toned-up, sexed-up New Divas of Dating. The ones who swan about the place pretending nothing and no one can hurt them while hiding the fragile, love starved heart of a tremulous 15 year old girl at her first rainbow party. Yes, you know who ‘they’ are. You may have even seen them in their natural habitats.

The cougars..

We’ve been hearing a lot about this curious breed of woman for some time. They’re the slightly salacious flavour of the year; the taut, tight and terrific women over 40 who not only refuse to act their age but also seem to be laboring under the idea that they deserve better than their single contemporary male peers for whom the right to date a much younger woman seems sacrosanct and immutable.

Silly cougars!

Don’t they know that once they pass the age of 40, they cease to be sexual creatures at all? They’re supposed to retire all notions of frivolity unless such larks involve elastic-waisted jeans, comfortable shoes and an embrace of book groups – basically, become lesbians or feminists, or a socially frightening combination of the two. Quelle horreur..

But here they are, flouting the system and openly declaring their proclivities for the golden boys still basking in the jasmine scented springtime of their youth. But Bolt knows that what they don’t see is the enormous emotional minefield they’re wading into, so high are they on the heady combination of come-hither French perfume and immovable Botoxed face muscles. These boys will BREAK their HEARTS and all they’ll have left is the tacit reminder of her folly – because “when the cougar unsheathes her claws, it’s on her own skin – and not her young man’s – that we must search for the scars.” Sad cougars.

And so the Boltster is worried about all these frightfully desperate cougars pouncing about, trying to regain their youth.

Because that’s what this comes down to, according to the Boltster: “A  woman at 60 is feeling her looks and sexuality - her youth and her life - slipping away.” Her very life! Poor cougars.

That’s the problem with womenfolk though. They’re always using sex to get something else they want. Like respect or diamonds or a house.

But if Bolt was worried that he’s the only one wanting some pretty damn hardcore investigation into women’s disturbing treatment of sexuality, he should think again. He very fortunately has yet another sound social researcher on the case in the form of Ms Samantha Brett, columnist and blogger for the Age.

This week, Ms Brett posed the question of whether or not casual sex was actually harming women as opposed to liberating them. This exceptionally new line of questioning – because Lord knows it’s asked so rarely, like, at least every other day – was met with possible agreement from Brett.

In this particular case, Brett was trying to establish if David Wygnant – “an infamous Los Angeles based dating expert who coaches men on how to pick up women” was correct in his assertion that “women are increasingly having sex like men” making it “impossible for a man to look at this woman as a prospective future partner.”

Rather than critically assess the stupidity of Wygnant’s words – ie that perhaps it’s not women but in fact men who have the problem behaving like adults, and that maybe, just maybe, we all have sex like each other and it’s only recently that women have gained the social power to do so – Brett employed what seems to be an historical tactic on her part. She asked a man with questionable credentials what he thought about some such question involving female empowerment and reported his answer as fact.

I quote:

“I decided to ask Dr Drew, host of hit TV show Sex Rehab on VH1, who agrees that it’s really the women who are to blame.

“Women hold the keys to the castle,” he said. “Women should set the standards and the men will co-operate….you guys can change this.”

Did you hear that, you guys? We can change this. But we gotta get our castle in order and pull up that drawbridge. Or something.

Far be it from me to question the authority of a man whose important televisual outings include the hard hitting Celebrity Rehab with Dr. Drew and its dramatic follow up Sober House. No doubt Dr Drew has had incredible success dealing with the rehabilitation issues of malaise soaked celebrities and their many problems – but when it comes to deciding whether or not it’s my fault that some men are children when it comes to dealing with sex and sexuality, I have to make some noise.

Which is exactly what I would hope – and, against my better judgment, continue to hope – Samantha Brett would do. As a highly successful sex and dating columnist, no one could possibly accuse her of being stupid. And yet time after time she continues to trot out the same kind of sexist rubbish that feeds into the clap trap Bolt was getting his knickers in a knot about.

Women try too hard to be like men. Women are having sex like men. Women think they’re tough, but really they’re soft and gooey and fragile on the inside. Men are base. Men are incapable of deep emotional thought. Men are incapable of viewing women as real people. Men are only after one thing. Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free? And on and on and on!

This line of thinking isn’t just offensive to women, it’s offensive to men. We cannot continue to push the ridiculous idea that men are rabid sex maniacs for whom women’s only role is to serve and pleasure. I know vast numbers of men who wouldn’t turn their nose up at pursuing a relationship with a woman just because she slept with him on the first date. I’d like to believe that this is largely because these men are fully formed emotional creatures, and not the single celled entities apparently swimming around in Dr. Drew’s pool. Because here’s an idea – if men can’t handle a woman having sex on the first date, maybe it’s not the role of the woman to change. Maybe the man just needs to grow up.

Women are constantly expected to walk a fine line between sexual availability and prudence. As pop culture would have it, we have to show that we’re up for it technically but that really we’ll only let you into our pants once you’ve bought us three dinners. We sensationalise older women dating younger men and call it a ‘phenomenon’ and create TV shows that simultaneously idolize and patronize them. We have columnists quoting the spurious opinions of middle aged men – or worse, columnists who ARE middle aged men – to lambast and shame the actions of women simply because they’re no longer playing by the rules.

Don’t we honestly have more important things to talk about than what a woman decides to do in her bedroom? Can’t we all be just a bit more interesting than that?

49 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • persephone says:

      06:30am | 06/02/10

      Maybe the cougars passed these men by.

      Nothing more bitter than a columnist scorned.

      Oh, and of course, it would be teh woman’s fault, for not realising what an opportunity they had missed.

    • T.Chong says:

      07:53am | 06/02/10

      Here in the socialist republic utopia of Pandora us Navi have a simple system.
      Tiddles may be a good singer, but Fuffy is a better hunter etc, so we let The Magic Shayga tree decide who wakes up in whos basket.
      (See the subtle feline connection to Cougars,? )
      After the ceremony we cat people then indulge in a feed of Snappy Tom, after all, no one wants a partner who only eats shoots and leaves.
      Peace to all Skywalkers,or as we say “Nannoo,Nannoo, Shuzbut.” (Please Respect Me In The Morning).

    • Realist says:

      08:07am | 08/02/10

      Post of the day!  I was in tears!!

    • June says:

      07:58am | 06/02/10

      Fantasic piece—an absolute pleasure to read.  I look forward to more posts from you!

    • Davy says:

      09:07am | 06/02/10

      “Don’t we honestly have more important things to talk about than what a woman decides to do in her bedroom?”

      Well apparently you dont.

    • clementine says:

      11:18am | 06/02/10

      Touche! Perhaps I should have phrased it thus: “Don’t we have more important things to do than shame women for daring to enjoy sex in a way she deems fit?” Pushing the idea that withholding sex leads to respect just reinforces the idea that women’s greatest use for it is as a bartering tool.

    • Davy says:

      03:07pm | 06/02/10

      If respect is something worth having, I would doubt very much that these women respect the younger men. I know from talking to guys about this kind of thing that they do not respect these women.  Most will take a “cougar” for fun if the pickings are lean. Its easier and you dont have to buy the drinks.

      Perhaps what this engenders in younger males is that it is ok to just have sex, and to treat a woman as a sex object. Something I would have thought you would not be so keen on.

    • DrNaomi says:

      07:14am | 07/02/10

      ‘Most will take a “cougar” for fun if the pickings are lean’ ... and here was I thinking young men were, you know, evolving ...

    • Billie says:

      12:24pm | 08/02/10

      Well said, Clementine. Women enjoying sex as they see fit.  What is so very wrong with that?

    • Napolean says:

      09:15am | 06/02/10

      Go girls!

    • Vicki PS says:

      09:40am | 06/02/10

      Where’s Eric today?

    • Eric says:

      12:47pm | 06/02/10

      I’ve got more important things to talk about than what a woman decides to do in her bedroom.

    • Jim says:

      10:12am | 06/02/10

      Why is it that female journalist have to write about female sexuality ad nauseam.
      What you write about is not a new phenomena - years ago young males trawled what was in those days, hotel, ‘ladies lounges’ with a view to getting it off with an older lady.
      The dictum “they don’t yell, they don’t swell, and they don’t tell’ was quite relevent in those pre-pill days.
      There must be more interesting things to write about for both you and Andrew.

    • Catharine Lumby says:

      11:54am | 06/02/10

      Clementine, brilliant stuff. When I turn 60 - in just 12 years - I’m throwing a pool party and inviting all the girls to come in bikinis. Hope you can make it.

    • clementine says:

      02:21pm | 06/02/10

      Hmmm. I’ll be 40 by then so provided I’m not savagely trawling the streets for young men to stave off the gut wrenching realisation that my youth and my very life will soon be slipping away, I call dibs on the floatie with the drinks holder.. Do you think there’ll be someone there for me to have casual sex with?

    • stephen says:

      09:07pm | 06/02/10

      Yeah, yoo hoo,(!!)  I can make it, am I’m comin’ in Alexander Downer’s dress.
      (It’ll look like a bean-bag on me, but hell, It’ll float.)

    • formersnag says:

      12:32pm | 06/02/10

      Haven’t female journalists, femanists, etc been saying, for decades, that men dating younger women, do so because they can’t handle, women their own age? Hmmm.

    • Eric says:

      02:03pm | 06/02/10

      Formersnag makes an excellent poiny.

      Now that cougars are all the rage, let’s see an end to all the whingeing about older men who chase younger women.

      After all, we have more important things to talk about than what a man decides to do in his bedroom.

    • Chase Stevens says:

      09:40pm | 06/02/10

      I thought you had more important things to do Eric old chap.

    • bec says:

      12:16pm | 07/02/10

      Yeah. I thought that you’d be too busy with fudging job interviews for your Newstart allowance, Eric…

    • James says:

      09:01am | 08/02/10

      Nah - I would much rather complain about both.

    • AdamC says:

      03:09pm | 06/02/10

      I am pro-cougar.  It makes sense for twenty-something men and forty-something women to date. Quite simply, cougars can solve a persistent failure in the dating ‘market’.
      What is the failure? Well, men in their twenties have a horrible time with women their age who are at the peak of their sexual market power and therefore very difficult to attract and retain. Meanwhile, women in their forties (and mid-thirties) find that they are no longer the sex-selectors they once were, and men their age often prefer younger women.
      The reason for this is that both men in their twenties and women in their thirties and forties tend to want to date people their own age, while twenty-something women and forty-and-thirty-something men are happy to date each other. The result, young women and middle aged men command a premium, while younger men and middle-aged women sell at a discount.
      The cut-priced stock can turn the tables by getting together with each other. Problem solved!

    • RB says:

      03:25pm | 06/02/10

      Its funny, but most of the derogatory comments i have heard & seen directed at ‘cougars’ has been from young women, not men.Women often seem to be their own worst enemies.I suggest you open up your eyes Clementine.

    • Liebe ist fur alle da says:

      03:35pm | 06/02/10

      No-one wants leftovers for Christmas lunch but the starving will take whatever morsel they can find.

      Just because a man will sleep with you doesn’t mean we want to date you, respect you, or marry you. It’s not because you slept with us that we’re not interested, we just didn’t think you were worthy of much more than a shag from the moment we met you. But if you offer it up freely enough we’ll take it (if we’re desperate and drunk).

      It’s up to you to decide whether leading such a life and engaging in such activities will fulfil your emotional needs on a deeper basis. If you just want a string of random flings and be used by guys who are desperate and willing to settle for anything for a bit of time then go for it. I’m sure you can validate your attractiveness that way.

      Frankly, I’m sick of going to clubs and having some middle-aged woman sidle up to me and start hitting on me. I can tell that under those size 12 jeans you’ve packed in some cottage cheese and the reason you’re not wearing a sleeveless dress is to hide the tuckshop arms. I can also spot botox faces when I see them. You’re not fooling anyone.

      That’s not to say, however, that I’m interested in the bleached and tanned Paris Hilton wannabes, either. I’m looking for quality.

      I doubt you could understand that considering that what you’ve written is full of contradictions, completely hypocritical and the usual shaming language you’d find in any pseudo-feminist writing that also isn’t properly referenced (no links to Brett or Bolt I note).

      Good luck with that

    • clementine says:

      02:16am | 07/02/10

      I rather think I do understand you, despite my feminist addled brain. Quality, for you, consists at least partly of a lack of hidden ‘cottage cheese’ and ‘tuckshop arms’.

      Good luck with that.

    • BT says:

      03:00pm | 07/02/10

      With comments like that, I can’t think why women have given up trying to have emotional relationships with men!

    • Lorraine Heaven says:

      03:39pm | 06/02/10

      The problem , Clementine, is that some women have decided to no longer live by the antiquated rules set by men.
      These rules were set to protect the monies and estates of men. Those days have passed…...  long ago.
      A woman has the right to do with her body what she will and the best of luck to her.
      Shame she can’t keep producing children like some of the very OLD men in our society.
      Lovely to see your work again. Feel sorry for poor old Jim, he can only talk about it like all the other guys.

    • Richard Young says:

      03:58pm | 06/02/10

      Unfortunately, any cougar who wants this young 61 year-old will have to be over 80 and into oral sex. Sadly, all I can do is talk about it. Aint nostalgia grand!

    • Lisa says:

      05:28pm | 06/02/10

      I am so sick of women lecturing men and other women on what the latest ‘rules’ are in sex right now. Sex is timeless, beyond fashion, discovered anew every generation, but unchanging.  I prefer to be with a permanent and loving partner, who has hopefully not shagged half the state in their ‘quest for fulfillment’. How about you?

    • xiaoecho says:

      06:22am | 08/02/10

      Hear! Hear! Lisa

    • S.L says:

      07:05pm | 06/02/10

      Those who talk about it the most…........ do it the least!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Old Bert says:

      01:51am | 07/02/10

      I,ve been subjected to the “cougar” over 40’s behaviour at a club, from one who had sex drive that I thought would never end. Trouble is, I had to walk home 10 miles afterwards. It was the bowls club, and she was clearly my senior by 10 years,  at age 85.

    • James says:

      09:22am | 07/02/10

      I find people who concern themselves with the sexual “goings on” a bit weird, if it ain’t illegal who gives a rats.

    • bec says:

      12:18pm | 07/02/10

      You’ll note that neither cottage cheese cellulite or bingo wingos can be found on RealDolls, Clementine. There’s hope for this one yet!

    • Wake up. says:

      06:19pm | 07/02/10

      So what, old men can chase young women and oogle at play boy magazines and its perfectly normal, but if an old women decides she wants to chase younger men this biast writer automatically turns HIS- note HIS- nose up at it? Absolutely sexist. Cut women some slack.

    • murray says:

      07:33pm | 07/02/10

      Hmm.  User ‘Wake Up.’, I’m certainly not a fan of HIS- note HIS- opinions, but I’m farily certain that hew would be at least as disapproving -if not more disapproving - of older men chasing younger women.  I offer his pieces on the television series ‘Californication’ as evidence.

    • DanTheVespaMan says:

      09:19pm | 07/02/10

      Cougars eh? The latest regurgitation from marketing scum trying desperately to create another label to exploit. The avalanche of movies, tv, books etc. will be positively hideous.

      Well said as always Clementine.

    • James M says:

      10:01am | 08/02/10

      If the womean is gay and has a younger partner (ie Ellen and PDR) is she still a cougar?

      I’m just asking…

    • DG says:

      10:27am | 08/02/10

      Who do peple try so hard to make this a gender issue - person A says they prefer a world in which there are no “Cougars”. Good for person A. That’s their right. I don’t see the controversy.

      RadioHost B says that one group, collectively, has the capacity to use sex to get the other half to behave as the group wants. That’s hardly new. It’s simply common sense. If you have something that someone else wants, you can control their behaviour pending giving them what they want (depending on how much they want it). If a group work collectively, and control supply, they can control the behaviour of the market. Why is this a gender issue?

      Journalist C trots out article after article of the same stuff week after week to an audience that love discussing the same topic week in and week out. It’s called knowing your audience. It’s a pretty basic part of providing a popular and profitable service.


      As for the issue of who should be having sex and when -

      Why isn’t is simply recognised that different people want different things? Some men as well as some women would rather be in relationships where the sex is kept for relationship rather than one night stands, similarly some men and and some women don’t want sex to be limited to relationships.

      Isn’t it just an issue of values? Is it really that bad to not want to be in a relationship with someone because of differing values? If a person doesn’t believe in having sex on a first date isn’t it likely that they may feel a values conflict when the other person is willing to have sex on the first date? If the person is uncomfortable with that values conflict they don’t have any obligation to enter a relationship.

      I agree there is a point of hypocrisy where a person of one gender expects that they should be able to do one thing while expecting something different from their partner. But who is the loser there? Presumably both are consenting adults - if you don’t like the hypocrisy don’t enter a relationship with a person.

      For example - Person A is well within their rights to only want to enter into a relationship with a person who has never had sex before. Whether they have had sex before is irrelevant. People are allowed to want whatever they like and are under no obligation to enter into a relationship or show any enthusiasm for individuals who behave otherwise than as they would like their partner to behave. Unless it is proposed that individual’s are no longer allowed to determine their relationships based on the likes, dislikes, behaviour and values of the other person.

    • Dave says:

      10:46am | 08/02/10

      Well, the day we just sit back and listen to Andrew Bolt and take on board his point of view we may as well all go and jump off the motorway bridges en mass!! Idiot!

    • Lily says:

      11:45am | 08/02/10

      GREAT ARTICLE! BRAVO! I have had these debates with friends (and even the guy I was sleeping with) about the issue of women who like sex or to “sleep around”. All have the horribly annoying view that they can’t respect a woman that sleeps around, has sex on the first date etc. And then there is the whole stupid cougar thing. You have summed up the points I have been trying to get across. Your article is the kick in the balls and ovaries these old fashioned arseholes need. Thanks!

    • Billie says:

      12:35pm | 08/02/10

      Oh hear hear!!  The idea that women, of any age, are only and ever looking for a long-term emotionally fulfilling relationship seems to persist in these comments.  It doesn’t seem to occur to people that sometimes women just want sex, they don’t want a deep and meaningful. And all this ‘I’d shag her but I’d never respect her’ - did it occur to you that she’d do the same - shag you with no interest in a relationship with you, and no intention of respecting you or calling you again?  And by the way, cougars don’t care if you don’t respect them, because they respect themselves.

      Newsflash: women enjoy sex and think it’s fun. Sometimes there’s no deeper meaning than that.

    • Sally says:

      12:57pm | 08/02/10

      Hey Ms Ford. I like your style.

    • Rossco says:

      02:11pm | 08/02/10

      I have no problem with women enjoying sex and plenty of it, but I do not find women having sex from randoms at the pub or club involving drugs and alcohol the least bit attractive at all (and I think women should demand the same regard of men). I have chick friends and have dated girls who have done this before and I dont judge them for, its what they do and if they have fun, good for them. Sure most of us have done it a few times, but I have learnt from life experiece that I just wouldnt want to be involved romantically or emotionally with girls who had once chosen this particular lifestyle. Id be willing to let a prior few bouts of drunken fun (or mistakes in some peoples dictionary) go by no problem, I mean most of us have done this even a few times. But there is a point of repetition of this behaviour when it becomes as a lifestyle for some, when it comes across as nothing more than the product of low self esteem and self destructiveness. Which is not attrative for a partner at all. I know the taboo is firmly aimed at women, but I think it’s the case for both genders. Girls enjoy sex and more power to them. But the girls who seek sex with randoms in alcohol and drug fuelled environments with randoms aren’t attractive in the least. Thats why most guys have problems with it.

    • Martin Snigg says:

      04:52am | 09/02/10

      Hold on, I thought sex was important. The author makes it sound like mere recreation. Women grow human beings inside their body - the existence of everything depends on this, the health of the family is . .  I mean its all important to the continued existence of our nation. People put their sexual lives somewhere near the centre of their identities - if we can’t be concerned about the propriety of sex what can we be?

      The author should remind that her fundamental attitude toward life saw her kill two of your own children in the womb. I would have thought that would be grounds to issue warnings; instead I read the words of a booster for the culture of sex and death. The words of a booster for massive corporate interests -  women who will sell their fertility and sexuality to this corporate culture and kill her own babies are a boon to profits. Even hard bitten Germaine Greer is able to nod towards feelings of remorse for her attitudes to sex - can’t reproduce (abortion damage) , can’t get married (failed relationships poison attitudes to opposite sex) . The sad vision of the cougar may be all the author can now imagine for herself after what she has done - she may feel compelled to try and recruit other to join her sad group if she cannot truly repent an rejoin the moral community - that is she may feel driven to create her own community of the sick and unrepentant. What we need to ask of her though is in the interests of young girls, make it clear that following her example would mean jeopardising the greatest goods in a human life. The author ought to ask her readers that by thinking with her about these things whether they are prepared to carry for the rest of their lives the burden of having procured the death of their own children. That would be writing.

    • Phil says:

      12:43pm | 18/02/10

      I think you are not alone in placing some hope with Sam Brett. I have read her column on and off for a few months. All here articles that start out sounding full of promise and insight, quickly scuttle themselves into a fluffy cross between New Idea & Dolly Doctor.

      I think as far as women’s and men’s sexuality goes. Do what you feel is the right thing to do.
      When or if, that certain someone special comes along, and won’t accept you because they disapprove of you “numbers”, you are the one that will have to live with it.

      That’s called cause and effect. You and only you are responsible for your actions. Not society and not a belated women’s movement .

    • Pharian says:

      05:09pm | 12/05/10

      Blah Blah Blah… Blah Blah Blah Blah.

      Blah.

      People may have sex with whoever they like. Stop being so precious. Unless someone is having sex with YOU then it is none of your business.

      Go outside and play in the sunshine now… or go to the bedroom and have lots of sex, either way, i dont care.

    • Ken says:

      08:16am | 16/08/11

      Well said Martin Snigg. Action leads to consequences.

    • Catherine says:

      10:46am | 13/03/12

      Two observations, for what they are worth:
      1. My experience (a few years ago) in the realm of online dating suggests that you sometimes have to fend off younger men with a virtual cricket bat! My profile pictures were recent and acurate and my age clearly stated as 45 and yet I was consistently contacted by younger men - the record holder was 23. I have no theory to explain this but found it interesting and widespread.
      2. Translation of the word “consequences” in the spiteful little world of Martin and Ken: when women have sex outside of marriage and without the express purpose of reproduction they will be punished. The punishment will come on the form of an STD, an unwanted pregnancy, an abortion that leads to infertility or becoming tainted both physically and socially and therefore unfit for marriage. See Old Testament or Barnaby Joyce for further details.
      (ps Clementine, you are a goddess of the highest degree)

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter