Australian school principals say that they need to have more control over what happens in their schools as a natural extension of school performance being transparent for all to see on the new MySchool website. 

Gillard's reforms met with unhappiness in blackboard jungle.

They are dead right, and the Coalition continues to hold to the belief that local school principals and parents (through the school’s governing council) know more about what is best for the school than faceless bureaucrats in Education Departments – number crunchers whose interaction with students is non-existent.

The strange thing about the debate on principal autonomy is that the Minister, Julia Gillard, says she’s in favour of it too – even though every action she has taken as Education Minister gives a lie to this claim.

Through the $16 billion spending marathon of the schools stimulus debacle, not one cent was provided directly to school principals to manage.  Instead Minister Gillard set up three-step process to entrench central authority.

• The Federal Department wrote guidelines for the States on how the program would roll out.

• The State Departments told the local schools what buildings they would receive.

• Local Principals and Governing Councils were given a yes/no choice on whether or not they would receive the building they were offered.

This is why we had the ridiculous examples so widely reported – schools without gyms being given a second hall; schools being told to knock down reasonable classrooms to build new rooms to the same design; and million dollar pavilions constructed by multinational building companies while local builders quoting a fraction of the price were denied.

Any sensible Government would have placed control of a program like that in the hands of local principals and governing councils – the people who know what the local school needs – as the former Government did in our school infrastructure programs.  Unfortunately Julia Gillard has a faith in the infallibility of the bureaucracy that is matched only by her hypocrisy in claiming she supports local autonomy.

In October, Minister Gillard released a document called the “Principal Autonomy Research Report”.  It is a report commissioned by former Minister Julie Bishop when the Coalition was in Government, and it was delivered to the Government in December 2007 – weeks after taking office.  It provides sixteen specific recommendations about how schools may be improved by providing greater autonomy for principals at the local level.

Julia Gillard’s office suppressed this Report’s publication for two years, until the Minister was confronted with the anger of Principals whose schools’ performance would now be held up to close comparison with other schools, but without any ability to take the necessary measures to improve their school.

The Minister claimed in her media release that the report ‘supports the direction of the education reforms the Rudd Government is pursuing’.  I commented at the time that she was clearly hoping nobody would read the report because it does no such thing.

To date Julia Gillard has followed only one of those sixteen recommendations – the development of a national curriculum that was already in train under the previous Government.  Despite her lip service to increased local autonomy, she has presided over the greatest expansion of bureaucratic control over our schools since the Department of Education was set up.

Minister Gillard seems to think that increasing transparency is an end in itself, although she argues that she is “against simplistic leagues tables”.  The fact is that those simplistic leagues tables are the only possible result of publishing school results without a consequent increase in principal autonomy allowing them to take the required action to lift the standards in their schools.  

22 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • persephone says:

      05:52am | 17/12/09

      Load of tosh.

      I’ve got friends who are principals. I know that they had discussions with the State regional offices before they were told what buildings they were being allocated. I know - and so do you, because Gillard has repeated it several times, and it’s also in the info schools get - that schools are encouraged to inform the project supervisor if the proposed structure doesn’t meet their needs.

      And I know, just as you do, that many schools have successfully negotiated with the government to ensure that they get buildings more appropriate to their needs.

      Taking a handful of examples of schools which were dissatisfied (and with a program of this scope, it is inevitable that some will be) and using it to say school principals have no power is drawing a long bow.

    • Ben says:

      06:24am | 17/12/09

      Doctors, teachers, miners, businessess, have all been burned by bad, bad labor/rudd policies. C’m on guys work on the grassroot level to get rudd out of politics.

    • T.Chong says:

      06:49am | 17/12/09

      The usual Lib whinge about “faceless bureaucrats”.
      It is the govt dept that has to deal with the overall picture, rather than just the narrow focus of the particular school and its principal and P+C.
      The local issues are certainly valid, but some one, some where along the line has to overall manage the budgets and plans, hence the bogey man of
      “the faceless bureaucrat”.
      The alternative to the “FB” is lack of accoutability, ad hoc decisions and pork-barreling populism , driven by the loudest mouth - similar to the Libs slush fund of projects before they were resoundingly defeated by Kevin in ‘07
      While the local principal and P+C might be heartfelt and genuine, that does not mean they are expert with finances.
      Similar to the non sense that local boards can somehow manage something as complex and costly as health services and hospitals.
      You need people who know how to manage big money and complex issues, and while the local florist might be a nice lady, that does not mean that they then have some ability to manage a school, or hospital (via boards)

    • Blaise says:

      07:04am | 17/12/09

      Just goes to show that Julia Gillard is an incompetent education minister. With these failures, she can’t possibly be considered for Prime Minister.

    • RT says:

      07:45am | 17/12/09

      Were you a teacher before entering Parliament, Christopher? If so, it’s good for a politician to have a profession to fall back on. From the predictions of analysts about your prospects at the next election, you might not have breathed the last of the chalk dust.

    • matt says:

      08:06am | 17/12/09

      Guys, maybe it’s just that the official Cabinet is too busy doing things like, you know, running the country or something, than to write for The Punch (priorities guys! smile ) but wouldn’t it be nice to have a bit of balance in the selection of writers?
      The Punch is in danger of becoming the Liberal’s in-house online journal.
      At least Chris Pyne is somewhat more rational than the wicked witches of the right, who seem to brew their poison on these pages with too-alarming regularity.
      I know there’s a Steve Conroy piece as well today (how is defending the indefensible going Steve?) but I fear the balance is tipped a little bit in favour of the of the lunar right.
      Better still, ban all politicians and give us more Shanahan (the rational one) and McIlveen.
      And more pictures of those pandas.

    • Drew says:

      08:37am | 17/12/09

      matt - you must have a short memory mate, for the last 18 months or so we have had nothing but anti-Turnbull bashing articles, stories about the Lib Leadership, Libs a rabble, Liberals in the wilderness, Liberals providing no Opposition on and on the stories have gone. Mixed with stories about Rudd the most polular PM in history, Rudd will win the unloseable election, Rudd tops polls again as prefered PM and on and on they went. So fair suck of the sauce bottle.

    • Kelly says:

      08:42am | 17/12/09

      hey matt, maybe the opposition are showing some opposition to the Government for a change, after all they are the opposition.

    • Macca says:

      08:50am | 17/12/09

      @Matt, see Stephen Conroy’s article two up from this. Fail

    • persephone says:

      09:19am | 17/12/09

      Err… Macca, learn to read.

      Matt refers to Conroy’s article.

      BTW, Mr Pyne, no mention that under your government schools had to put up a flagpole to receive funding - and that schools had to display ‘Australian values’ posters?

    • H of SA says:

      09:26am | 17/12/09

      Matt, you mentioned Chris Pyne not being quite as zany as the wicked witches of the right….this is because he is a moderate liberal and therefore somewhat in touch with the vast majority of this nation who sits around the middle. The sad irony is that he is in a marginal seat and the hard right keeps making his job of keeping it much harder.

    • Heléna says:

      09:29am | 17/12/09

      my problem is not so much with the need for the designated buildings but with the ridiculous costs, my son’s school is getting a staff room and a new classroom, to the tune of $800K - insane! how can two rectangular buildings, one room each, on a level site possibly cost that much to build?and these budgets are replicated at each and every school - what a ridiculous waste of our money! - money that is sorely needed elsewhere

    • Sylvia says:

      09:50am | 17/12/09

      The principles are free and can do what they have to do.
      They have to follow the law as all of us.
      In any job we do there are guide lines and safety rules we have to obey.
      I am sure that they and all of us have a line to appeal or complain if there is need.
      If we all did as we like there would be an anarchy.
      Can anyone tell me what Howard government did to improve schools and the system.
      As you can easy tell I am one of Howard’s policy product.
      If it was up to you Chris there would be many more half tweets like me around.
      From very little I know only the Labour invest and improves education.
      Sadly for me I have to go back to school now.
      Thanks Chris.

    • Jack G says:

      10:05am | 17/12/09

      chrisopher pyne reminds of a school yard brat, and the type to take his books and run if nothing is going his way

                                                            JACK

    • Steve of Cornubia says:

      01:39pm | 17/12/09

      Hey JackG, I was going to say what an illuminating, thought-provoking and intelligent contribution you made there….

      ...except it wasn’t any of those things. Just the usual leftie tactic of going for the man, not the ball.

      Surprise!

    • BusterQ says:

      02:14pm | 17/12/09

      Jack G - you have Christopher Pyne mixed up with Kevin Rudd mate.

    • D'oh says:

      02:55pm | 17/12/09

      Wait, here it comes…...

      [face palm]

      Just because there are one or two right leaning articles does not make The Punch right leaning.  In fact, if you were to catergorize the articles over the past few months as Right or Left, you will find more Left Leaning than Right leaning.  Comments seem to be about equal though which is good and as stated elsewhere (was it you persephone??) is good for democracy.

      @ T.Chong “some where along the line has to overall manage the budgets and plans”

      And didn’t they do a bang up job!!

      @ persephone “BTW, Mr Pyne, no mention that under your government schools had to put up a flagpole to receive funding - and that schools had to display ‘Australian values’ posters?”

      Shame on them persephone, being Australian schools and all, shame on them for trying to instill some pride with a flag (as opposed to burning them say) and values into the next generation of Australians.

    • Nol says:

      07:18pm | 17/12/09

      Rudd gets an F in managing Australia, go throw a tantrum about that…....

    • persephone says:

      08:47pm | 17/12/09

      Yes, d’oh, and the only way to make children patriotic is to force them to be so.

      Oh, and wave flags at them.

      And a poster quoting an Englishwoman who pretended to be a man and lived in adultery, with a backdrop photo of a New Zealander, is really going to instill values into them.

      D’oh, you’ve really got to give up the face palming. You must be getting quite sore by now.

    • D'oh says:

      01:08am | 18/12/09

      Meh, no one is forcing anyone to do anything persephone.

      Values listed on the poster:
      Care & Compassion
      Doing your Best
      Fair Go
      Freedom
      Honesty & Trustworthiness
      Integrity
      Respect
      Responsibility
      Understanding Tolerance & Inclusion

      Can’t have our kids learning about these nowcan we, how evil….

      “And a poster quoting an Englishwoman who pretended to be a man and lived in adultery, with a backdrop photo of a New Zealander, is really going to instill values into them.”

      Not a very compassionate, respectful, tolerant understanding or inclusive comment. No wonder you did not like it, you were more interested in the pseudonym and photo that the values themselves.

      I am trying to limit the face palming, you are right it is indeed starting to hurt.  I just cannot believe what some people write on here (myself included!!).

    • avaidaEldek says:

      03:05am | 18/12/09

      Howdy ya’ll!

      I am most likely the first to say this, but most likely not the last: Seasons Greetings!!!

      avaidaEldek
      automated software

    • JonesLea20 says:

      07:40am | 28/08/10

      That’s understandable that money can make people autonomous. But what to do if someone does not have money? The only one way is to try to get the loans or bank loan.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter