Note: Labor MP Richard Marles and Liberal MP Sophie Mirabella are among our favourite contributors to The Punch, and we have asked them to write a piece every Friday during this five-week election campaign giving their take on events.

Class act: Julia Gillard in Canberra yesterday. Pic: Gary Ramage

Julia Gillard speaks from the heart. She is the best performer in the federal parliament.

Through five weeks of controversies this is a proposition that is not controversial. The Liberals may quibble about how she uses notes, but for anybody who follows politics her ability to perform is beyond debate. Yet this is just one attribute of Julia Gillard.

Having known Julia for more than twenty years and having seen her operate at close range, I know something of what makes her tick.

Julia has ideals. She has always been about the promotion of opportunity for all: through great education, through fair employment, through having the ability to protect one’s health. She is compassionate and sensible. She has idealism tempered with a hard nosed sense of what’s possible. Even in her twenties, when many were all over the place in what they thought and said, she was making sense.

Julia has judgement. She has the capacity to apprehend quickly the full landscape of a decision. She has an instinctive sense of which alternative best advances the national interest. In a world of complex problems and competing views, Julia has long been a voice that people listen to.

Julia is accessible. I spoke to one Labor MP who expressed the view that Julia was the first PM who she felt was one of us. And that is because Julia does not live in an ivory tower. She has an open door. She is generous with her time.

Julia is joyful and funny. I know a person – not involved with politics herself – but who has a lot to do with Julia, who observed that Julia’s office is always filled with laughter. Julia knows that life without laughter struggles for meaning. She also knows the power of good humour in navigating a crisis. And Julia’s staff love working with her.

Julia is calm. I have never seen Julia Gillard lose her temper. I have never met anyone who has. It is an enviable quality.

Indeed as a politician trying to become better at my craft hers are the qualities I would most want to emulate.

In short, Julia Gillard is a class act.

I also know something of Tony Abbott and I recognise that he is a good man.

The Tony Abbott I know is a man of firm beliefs. Aside from the shroud that has been placed over them in the last month, they are beliefs which he has held throughout his life with sincerity.

They are legitimate beliefs but they are not mainstream beliefs.

Deep inside, Tony does harbour an old fashioned view toward women. He believes in a workplace where the rights of an employer are held to the exclusion of those of the employee. He has a fundamentalist belief that governments should never have a role in the market, even in the depths of a financial crisis, which is why he did not support stimulus in 2009 even though he knew the result would be hundreds of thousands more people on the dole queues.

In his heart Tony hankers for the safety of the 1950’s. And when your frame of reference is a world which pre-dates the internet or climate science it is little wonder you believe that climate change is crap and that broadband is there for the kids to download songs.

What worries me most about Tony Abbott is that his rigid beliefs are for him the basis of combat. They are there to be ordered into battlelines.

His thinking is fixed and he is not generous to other views or other fields of enquiry to the ones he has pursued himself.

Tony is not interested in economics. And his dismissiveness of that field of enquiry is the only explanation of why a man of his undoubted intelligence has not taken the time to get his figures right in the biggest campaign of his life. If you thought economics mattered even a little bit would you have allowed yourself to be at odds with your shadow treasurer over election promises to the tune of $8billion as he lined up for his treasurer’s debate?

Tony is not interested in science and technology. And being dismissive of it is the only explanation of why he hasn’t bothered to get his head around even the basics of broadband or the unambiguous consequence of climate science.

It is this ideological combativeness which is the most glaring contrast with Julia Gillard, for she has an open mind that is keen for new knowledge and enjoys hearing the ideas of others.

For Tony Abbott leadership is about ruling via the division which inevitably flows from intellectual conflict. For Julia Gillard leadership is about bringing people together and finding the consensus in public policy which can unite a country.

Tomorrow the choice is stark.

28 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • aghast says:

      07:01am | 20/08/10

      what concerns me is seeing Julia lying to people on her meet the workers trips treating them like complete idiots. unfortunatly labors campaign has been based on spin, work choices, 1bil from healthcare, and dont start me on the NBN, and then on the last 24 hours of the campaign she eventually lets out the secret that if elected she may bring in a carbon tax after months of saying this wont happen in the next three years. the worst government in my 37 years as a voter.

    • acotrel says:

      08:56am | 20/08/10

      ‘Deep inside, Tony does harbour an old fashioned view toward women. He believes in a workplace where the rights of an employer are held to the exclusion of those of the employee. He has a fundamentalist belief that governments should never have a role in the market, even in the depths of a financial crisis, which is why he did not support stimulus in 2009 even though he knew the result would be hundreds of thousands more people on the dole queues’

      And people are actually thinking of voting for him?  THAT’S A WORRY!

    • aghast says:

      09:24am | 20/08/10

      Libs did support the first poorly managed tranche of stimulus and supported a much smaller 2nd stimulus, which in hindsight would have been smart. By the way the GFC was mainly a northern hemisphere bombshell only NZ went into a mild short term recession in the SH. and there you go bagging someone who cares about his family his daughters and old fashioned values in his life not yours. Tell me another Polly who volunteers as a lifesaver, bush fireman and spends part of his Xmas leave doing volunteer work for our most needy in the Northern Territory. But unfortunately in 3 years time the libs will have to step back in when our interest rates hit double digit and unemployment heads the same way as has been the case every time Labor has been in Government since Federation FACT.

    • Phil says:

      07:04am | 20/08/10

      Richard, the main difference I see is that one has big ears, the other a big nose and ar#e.

      Seriously, werent you one of those singing the Kevin Rudd jingle last election. Given the strong sense of fidelity that seems to work its way threw labor the country over, isnt it slightly hypocritical to state that Julia is now the Queen Bee. Can you and everyone in labor give a guarantee in writing that if she wins she will recontest the next election as PM. Doesnt the Australian people deserve at least that much from you lot. Cause if Abbott wins, you can guarantee that he will be PM at the next election, sure Malcolm wont be happy, but the party is strongly behind Tony.

      Kevin at my work who only 12 months ago said labor was in power for a generation, and that the liberal party would become the democrats at this election looks like a right twa7 right now. I just wish at the time he had the nuts to accept my $1,000 bet that Kevin would not win the next election for Labor as PM.

      The campaign has been bland, no one would disagree with that even the political tragics. No major policies, cause you lot spent all the cash last time.

      As you say Tony is not interested in economics, he is a Rhodes Scholar. Who on your side currently has the same credentials, and dont bring out Bob Hawke, he is probably not a bad bloke but far closer to pushing up daisies than being part of a Labor Ministry.

      You lot have f@ck all knowledge of business workings, as most of you have attempted to bleed and extort monies as union hacks, going on junkets overseas and living the high life whilst your members struggle day to day.

      You ask treasury to do you numbers and the coalition accountants. Please advise which year treasury got the numbers right? Last election you had a 4b broadband its now 43b and some recon it will get to 60+b. You fail to say that to bring it in your home you will need to rerun cables at a massive cost, and that with wireless now able to offer 100mbps at a cost, yours might be outdated by the time it is finished.

      I pity our country if you lot are relected. The voters as in NSW get the government they deserve.

    • Nicole says:

      07:57am | 20/08/10

      Richard, your discription of Jooolya is, well, gooey and soppy. A little bit hard to take this early in the morning. You’ve completely put me off my trail of thought. So I just have one question for you: Who’s going to replace Jooolya as opposition leader after tomorrow night?

    • The Badger says:

      09:11am | 20/08/10

      Nicole,
      The conservative mutual admiration blog
      is over there ———->

    • Dom says:

      10:44am | 20/08/10

      @Nicole,
      Adopting a “train of thought” will get you there faster:)

    • Nicole says:

      11:49am | 20/08/10

      @Dom, no with the way public transport is at the moment!

    • The Scarlet Pimpernel says:

      07:58am | 20/08/10

      I’m seeing a few backflips, frankly, and they don’t seem to point to a person of deep conviction as you state.

      Carbon tax - will there or will there not be one during the next term if Gillard gets in? One minute no, next minute yes.

      Internet censorship - one minute waiting for a report (which means dumping it if they don’t need Family First senate support), next minute (and last minute, I might add) we are definitely having censorship.

      One computer per child - will this continue until they all have one or will it stop? Again, conflicting signals.

    • fehowarth says:

      08:02am | 20/08/10

      Coalition voters that yearn for the so-called golden Howard years be aware.  Mr. Abbott might be rebirthing Howard’s policies, he is not a Howard.  He was Howard’s enforcer and shit digger, nothing more.

      Does this describe Mr. Abbott or is ADHD nearer the mark.  He could not stand still during the first debate.  Rocked back and forwarded on his feet.  In the last 23 hours his behavior is frantic.
      Hyperactivity
      Fidgets with hands or feet or squirms in seat.
      Leaves seat in classroom or in other situations in which remaining seated is expected.
      Runs about or climbs excessively in situations in which it is inappropriate (in adolescents or adults, may be limited to subjective feelings of restlessness).
      Has difficulty playing or engaging in leisure activities quietly.
      Appears “on the go” or acts as if “driven by a motor.”
      Talks excessively.

    • acotrel says:

      08:59am | 20/08/10

      They don’t call him the ‘mad monk’ for nothing!

    • Sigmund Freud says:

      09:31am | 20/08/10

      You can smell the panic in the Labor ranks. What smear will they pull out next?

    • MarK says:

      03:18pm | 20/08/10

      It is all they have left Sig…just a hope.

      Remember all the positive politics and ending of the blame gaem Rudd and Julia were bringing us in 2007? Just more spin.

    • Adam Diver says:

      08:58am | 20/08/10

      I feel sorry that labor has you writing for them for the punch Richard. You really have served up really poor pieces and on the punultimate day you give us this article, whilst positive just really dumb. Politically and otherwise.

      Best Performer: Nobody wants a performer we don’t know if its real or fake. Not exactly an endearing quality for a politician

      Ideals: Socialist ones? Poor choice to use particularly as everyone has ideals anyway

      Judgement: Rudd and Latham???

      Just on the substance that is a really poor effort, I can only hope its due to lack of time as you are campaigning heavily. Surely there are better qualities of the government to praise moreso than being funny and calm.

    • Carl Palmer says:

      09:34am | 20/08/10

      “His thinking is fixed and he is not generous to other views or other fields of enquiry to the ones he has pursued himself”

      I believe that there is real substance in TA book and the proposition he puts forward makes complete sense and certainly challenges the reader thinking. At least TA documented his views and beliefs, I haven’t read or seen anything of any note, depth or substance from Julia. If we were to compare the two on that basis it would be chalk and cheese.

    • haggis says:

      12:27pm | 20/08/10

      JULIA GILLARD wrote in a Socialist Forum leaflet c 1985 “This cycle of expectation and disappointment is fuelled by the Labor Party often promising the world when in opposition, whether or not the promises can be upheld in government, and the lack of political experience with and education about the realities of government.”

      The Socialist Forum came from far to the left of the Labor Party.

    • Joan says:

      10:39am | 20/08/10

      `Julia Gillard speaks from the heart.` Yes the hypocrites souless heart made of A4 paper/

    • Paul says:

      11:03am | 20/08/10

      I have nothing against Abbott as a person. He has some odd personal & religious beliefs, but that’s okay. He’d probably feel the same way about me. But I do not think he is Prime Minister material, nor are Hockey and Robb fit for controlling Treasury and Finance. I readily admit that the Rudd govt stuffed up badly several times in its first term, but I still think a Gillard govt is the safer option for Australia (however, if Turnbull was still leader of the Opposition I would be tempted to vote Liberal).

      The Coalition supporters cointually cry about Labor spin and alleged media bias while myopically overlooking the b.s. coming from Abbott & co and the manufactured ‘scandals’ over Gillard’s marital status (who cares?), the fact she has no kids (good choice, in my opinion), she’s an atheist (very sensible), her use of notes at the ALP campaign launch (yawn), taxing the poor miners (boo hoo), and so on. At best, it’s amusing; at worst, it’s extremely pathetic.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      12:46pm | 20/08/10

      I feel fairly similar to you Paul. I reckon Abbott would be a great guy to meet in person, but a poor choice for PM.

      I also find it not so much amusing but surreal that coalition supporters can feel aggrieved about spin in a Murdoch nation.

      Still Labor doesn’t get my vote, neither does Tony though.

    • MarK says:

      03:32pm | 20/08/10

      Ok Paul let us dissect your 2nd paragraph

      1. Spin occurs from both sides no argument but I will contend Labor are the master of the soundbite and 24 hour news cycle.

      2. Gillards marital status was never a scandal. No one cares. It is a fact that is all

      3. Ditto re kids. A fact.

      4. That she is an atheist is also a fact. It has certainly not been used by Liberals members to bash her and make up names about her because of it

      5. It was her minders that talked up the “off the cuff” speech. She lied about it. She sed notes. If nothing had been said by her mionders no one would have cared. Abbott used notes. He didn’t try to lie about it though. A problem of their making that goes to the heart of the incessant spin and media control.

      6. Yes taxing the “poor” miners was a big thing. She backflipped and was weak.

      At best you have misunderstood most of the things that you have raised.

      At worst you are misrepresenting them.

    • Rosie says:

      12:02pm | 20/08/10

      After watching Julia Gillard last night and this morning I think that you guys should be deeply concerned with what will happen to her if she loses. Her negativity seen yesterday and today towards Tony Abbott only tells us of a very desperate and calculating human being. I feel very sorry for her and her supporters as I know what it is like to be a staunch supporter of a political party.

      This morning it was absolutely refreshing to see on Channel 9 “Abbott’s Girls” being interviewed by Karl. It oozed so much family values and support. How wonderful it was to watch and hear Tony Abbott’s wife and daughter chat in a pleasant manner to Karl.

      It made me think if Tony Abbott loses this election life goes on normally in the Abbott family. Julia Gillard on the other hand has to win to save face from the brutal act she had to do to achieve her ambition as PM of this nation. It would not be anything I am certain any of us would like to put ourselves through. I think about who is going to be there for her if she doesn’t make it tomorrow? You may say well Tim will be there! I wouldn’t be that sure because he also was asked to appear this morning on Channel 9 but declined.

      She has a lot more to lose than Tony Abbott.

    • Liz says:

      01:59pm | 20/08/10

      Why aren’t you watching Sunrise?

    • Nicole says:

      02:17pm | 20/08/10

      @Liz, probably because it’s crap!

    • fairsfair says:

      12:09pm | 20/08/10

      “which is why he did not support stimulus in 2009 even though he knew the result would be hundreds of thousands more people on the dole queues.”

      The above is not spin - it is a lie - there is a difference. You should have your biro license revoked for stating the above.

    • Steve_of_Cornubia says:

      12:24pm | 20/08/10

      I suppose, Richard, that when you say “Julia speaks from the heart”, you’re actually spelling ‘heart’ a little differently, i.e. “N-O-T-E-S”?

      Also, it’s been interesting - and amusing - to watch Gillard morph into Tony Abbott over the past weeks. Not only has she copied various policies (i.e. offshore processing) but she has studiously watched his style and even copied that, i.e. getting off her high perch and imitating his more down-to-earth style following the Rooty Hill meeting.

      Will she, like all Labor shape-shifters,  revert to the real-real-real Julia if she is elected?

    • C'mon says:

      04:40pm | 20/08/10

      “He has a fundamentalist belief that governments should never have a role in the market, even in the depths of a financial crisis, which is why he did not support stimulus in 2009 even though he knew the result would be hundreds of thousands more people on the dole queues.”

      Let’s be fair here. The Coalition did support the first round of stimulus because they agreed it was an appropriate measure. They didn’t support the second round of stimulus because they believed it was not necessary and too much too soon after the height of the financial crisis had passed.

      The merits and impact of the second round of stimulus on the crisis is debatable.

      But Tony Abbott was not the only one warning the government against the necessity or rush nature of the second stimulus package. Others, including unions were sounding similar warnings to a deaf government and the results, unintended as they may have been, can be clearly seen in the waste of money and human lives that we got from the BER and pink batts schemes.

      But Richard, trying to create an impression that the Coalition was against all stimulus is a dishonest attempt to fool the less informed voters. It is this kind of tactics that is giving Labor a bad reputation in the eyes of those who are not loyalists of any particular party. 

      I just wish politicians would stop for a moment and recognize that it is much more effective and worthy of praise to be honest and concentrate on spelling out their merits and strengths, even pointing out genuine mistakes of their opponents rather than relentlessly fabricating deceitful attacks against them.

    • Katz says:

      07:21am | 21/08/10

      I will vote for the party that has a vision for the future that includes things we don’t even know about yet; that is sometimes prepared to take a bit of a risk because if you don’t try you always fail; that understands that the future of ...the country lies in the hands of those not yet old enough to vote and therefore have to have the best education opportunities possible. I will not vote for a party whose core philosophy is to invest in nothing and hoard wealth during times of ecomonic prosperity to guard against bad times but then oppose using that wealth to ease the burden when times are bad. I will not vote for someone who has held firm and consistent views about women, gay rights, indigenous issues, the poor and the homeless for all of their adult life and then at the age of 50 pretends to change those views because there is an election. I will be voting Labor.

    • marie curtin says:

      10:30am | 25/08/10

      the difference is..She is a woman and he is a man…..she believes in nothing so falls for everything..and in so doing appeals to the masses..he believes firmly in something above himself..and creates distinctions…He has beliefs and she doesn’t..
      Chesterton once said..“A dead thing goes with the stream..only a live thing can go against it..” and further
      Orthodoxy or traditionalists..are accused of being old fashioned..but in reality..they are the radicals..why should you have the right to have modern opinions/change laws, based on fashions..merely because you are walking the earth at the moment…traditionalists beleive in the tried and tested..thats our Tony..

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter