The loneliest man in the Labor Party never stops talking to people.

Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard chit chatting in QT yesterday. Picture: Gary Ramage

You would be financially wrecked if you had the telephone bill of Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd who is dialing around the international dateline.

He listed his calls yesterday - over the past few days he has spoken to the UN Secretary General, the US Secretary of State, the US Deputy Secretary for Near Eastern Affairs, and the heads of the IMF and the World Bank.

In addition,  Mr Rudd has reached out to others of his rank. He has contacted the foreign ministers of the EU, UK, Germany, Turkey, Japan, Korea, Indonesia, South Africa, Brazil and Egypt.

It’s all about getting together assistance for the Egyptians: ``And that’s why we are running up the telephone bill quite a lot in recent times.’‘

But why telephone when you can drop in? This week he will leave for visits to Egypt and Tunisia.

The hardest working man in the foreign affairs biz has been flat out keeping an eye on the upheavals in the Middle East and North Africa, and now the dreadful disaster in New Zealand.

And among the many he has been speaking to is Prime Minister Julia Gillard. They spent some time together Monday morning and spoke twice during Question Time yesterday.

However, by some informed estimates there are many more people in the Labor Party talking about Kevin Rudd than are speaking to him.

The former party leader appears a solitary figure at Government gatherings but always produces comments in his wake. The speculation around the confidential Labor Report on the last election has ensured that.

The un-published report is said to point to leaks against Julia Gillard during the campaign, leaks said to have come from pro-Rudd sources, as significant destabilising factors which might have cost victory.

Mr Rudd has consistently denied he leaked or authorised leaks.

But then there was the agonising meeting between him and Gillard in Brisbane which was arranged to settle the intense hostility between them, at least for the duration of the campaign. Instead, he looked like a man who planed to sue for breach of promise.

Mr Rudd has also been travelling through Australia and finding he is something of a celebrity. People in Perth and Adelaide have been stopping him for autographs and photos, particularly young people.

He has bought a $2 million house in Canberra to make clear he is not going away, and he is using the apparent endorsement of Gen Y to justify that decision to stick around.

Also driving him is the belief, probably an accurate one, that he would have won the election scheduled for late last year had he not been knocked off by Julia Gillard in June.

And he is capable of savage words about Gillard if prompted—often when he isn’t. He does not criticise her performance as PM. It’s much more personal and bitter.

And Mr Rudd doesn’t limit himself to one person. He has special views about the right-wing Shoppies, the union which backed Ms Gillard to replace him. He points out that the union’s actively Christian leadership worked to get an atheist for Prime Minister.

There also is a Rudd view of the AWU, the other trade union involved in destabilising him that night in Parliament House.

Yesterday, at the National Press Club, Mr Rudd backed Ms Gillard’s rebuke to the union for heavy-handed attacks on Trade Minister Craig Emerson.

He referred to the AWU leaders involved as ``said factional thugs’‘.

``On the broader question of…factional leaders and their role within the Australian Labor Party: We are at our best when they are at their least. And that is an important principle,’’ he said.

``What I want to see is a party where individual members and individual parliamentary members can say whatever they want, wherever they want, free of any fear of intimidation of factional leaders.’‘

Kevin Rudd doesn’t have any fear of factions. They have done their worst to him and now its his turn.

98 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Against the Man says:

      05:49am | 23/02/11

      KRudd is a broken man. Once a PM. Currently a multi-millionaire. But he has lost all pride and respect and left with a legacy of shame. The history books that high school kids will read 20 years from now will paint him as a inept PM that didn’t even last one term. Not even one term. Images of him crying in front of his family as he said goodbye to Australia as PM is likely what we will remember as the real KRudd. KRudd should have faded away like Nixon and to find another avenue to gain respect from the public but instead he is over-compensating as this run around do nothing foreign minister, very similar to his run around do nothing role as PM. KRudd = NATO (No Action Talk Only). The only way KRudd will expunge his demons and honour his family is if he takes down Gillard. But does he have it in him? Is he brave enough to fight someone stronger than an air hostie? Who knows? At this point who cares? Historical pariah indeed.

    • Grumpy says:

      07:51am | 23/02/11

      Atleast he was elected. Unlike the current PM…and to do it he beat the unbeatable. He has nothing to be ashamed of, except being a part of a party that really has no clue.

    • acotrel says:

      08:17am | 23/02/11

      Perhaps if Kevin Rudd continues to work conscientiously at foreign affairs, we might avoid getting involved in another protracted and dirty war?:  If Alexander Downer had a similar work ethic we might not be in Iraq or Afghanistan?

    • David C says:

      08:48am | 23/02/11

      do you think Julia will cry when she goes (in even less time)?

    • Macca says:

      08:52am | 23/02/11

      KRudd is his own man and nobody else’s. Poitics was probably a poor, although not unlikely choice. Particularly in a Decomcracy.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      09:43am | 23/02/11

      His legacy will be the apology to the stolen generations. Some people today (typically the ones with the least experience and knowledge of indigenous affairs) don’t get why this was so significant.

      Today some people don’t get it. 20-30-40-50 years from now those people’s descendants won’t get how their ancestors could fail to get it.

    • ZSRenn says:

      09:48am | 23/02/11

      @ Actoral Did you not see the wikileak where he suggested we and the US should start arming ourselves for an eventual war with China. Now that is a war we would lose and big time. You would not have to worry about that one being protracted I agree.

    • persephone says:

      10:01am | 23/02/11

      ZSRenn

      no, no one saw that wikileak, because it doesn’t exist.

      There is a wikileak where (according to the US) he said that it would be best to build up a positive relationship with China, but - in case that wasn’t possible - it would be a good idea to be prepared for any possible threats.

      Which is sort of common sense.

    • TheRealDave says:

      10:32am | 23/02/11

      But then we would never have had Lord Downer of Baghdad striding around!

    • John A Neve says:

      10:34am | 23/02/11

      A the M,

      Are you a prophet? How do you know what the “high school kids will read in 20 year from now”?

      Have you ever met Rudd? Please tell, what makes you aware of his loss of
      “pride and respect”?

      Seems to me A the M you are just one of the ignorant blowhards.

    • iansand says:

      10:43am | 23/02/11

      ZSRenn - If you are not prepared to deploy force if everything goes wrong what is the point of an army?  Parades?

      Clausewitz siad “War is diplomacy by other means” and he is right.  So, incidentally, was Zhou Enlai who said “Diplomacy is war by other means”.  Rudd was just expressing a bit of realpolitik.  If you are not prepared to deploy force, and let your oponent know you are prepared to deploy force, you may as well take up crochet.

      The only people who thought Rudd’s comment was the slightest bit out of order or surprising were the irredeemably partisan or terminally bewildered (assuming they are not the same).

    • persephone says:

      10:46am | 23/02/11

      ZS

      No need, yours says exactly what I said it did - that the best course was to try and integrate China into the world community, but to be prepared if that doesn’t work.

      That’s not saying, as you did, that ‘eventual war’ will be the end result.

    • rufus says:

      11:20am | 23/02/11

      Grumpy - if Julia ‘wasn’t elected’, how did she become PM? Why, the same as every PM before her - she leads the party that has the support of the majority of members of the lower house - just as legitimate as if Labor had won a landslide last August. You really must move on from denial.

    • KKS says:

      11:35am | 23/02/11

      Yes, that’s right, Grumpy, at least KRudd was elected and would have no doubt won last year’s election in his own right as opposed to this fake Pm who happens to alternate between “Fake and Real Julia”

      She is a joke and always will be, out of her depth!
      BTW, I am not a KRudd fan either!

    • ZSRenn says:

      12:15pm | 23/02/11

      @iansand and peresphone. Yes yes I agree

      “be prepared to possible threats” (defend)and

      “deploy force” (attack)

      are exactly the same thing.

      In One Eyed Labor Voter Land and Fairy Land.

    • iansand says:

      02:01pm | 23/02/11

      ZSRenn - That would be getting your retaliation in first.

      You and I obviously have a different understanding of the word “deploy”.

    • ZSRenn says:

      02:40pm | 23/02/11

      @iansand deploy is a transitive and intransitive verb to position troops, weapons, or resources in a specific area in readiness for action, or take up position in this way. This is an aggresive move. What would the retaliation by us be for? Because we could not win the trade war we would start throwing bombs at them? With the amount of money the US owes China and they want back I doubt they would attack nor do they have a defence force with the tools to do so. (Aircraft carrier would be the first requirement.) They would only have to call in the debt and it’s game over. US broke massive unemployment. Do we retaliate because the US cant pay its debt? I’m glad your not my bank manager.

    • Against the Man says:

      03:00pm | 23/02/11

      Johnny A my man smile looks like I’ve hit a nerve, a nice raw nerve (are you Ruddd incognito?) Rudd is Mud, you don’t have to be psychic to know his legacy is Sh@*t. Didn’t last a term, knifed by the useless Gilltard, zero policy success, so you see if you can’t figure out Rudd’s shameful legacy than you have a problem and need to see help stat!

      I know of his temper and how he attacks those weaker than himself.

      Hope you’ve learnt something today.

    • iansand says:

      05:42pm | 23/02/11

      ZSRenn - So moving a few troops to Darwin is aggressive?  Or even sending a few of our Army blokes and blokettes over to Christchurch.  If you think so.

      But even if it does imply aggression, so what?

    • Ricky says:

      05:46pm | 23/02/11

      Acotrel, please go and check the speech made by Krudd in Parliament in Sept 2009 as acting shadow foreign ministers, you should kn ow this speech as foreign affairs seem to be something you comment on frequently. Once you have found the transcript (easy enough as it is public information) i would remind to look for the part where Krudd states his and the ALP 100% belief in WMD’s being held by Hussein, He also states that he and the ALP supported the war in Iraq 100%(only to change his tune when it became politically expedianet) he categorically states that “Hussein has used WMD’s on his own people and will do so again in the future” - Once you actually read fact rather than Hawker Britton BS, please come back and remove your idiotic comment. Krudd was ingored by the USA, CHINA, INDIA when these three nutted out the watered down Dopenhagen accord. He was completely shut ot of any meaningful discourse (Whiel he was PM) and now you believe his ranting and screeching is being listened to by anyone??? Another failed ex ALP PM who realies on other peoples money (his Wife’s) to survive.

    • PaulB says:

      06:11am | 24/02/11

      I’d love to think you would be right on that Acotrel, but I think forces bigger the Howard and Rudd were mandating that we be there in these wars regardless of the official public version of the truth.

    • ZSRenn says:

      10:59pm | 24/02/11

      @ iansand. Yeh that will show them lol Talk about twisting what was said. Have you got your app in for that spin doctor job with the ALP in yet?

    • Faz says:

      06:07am | 23/02/11

      Some of the most bitter enemies are within, thus it ever was: Abbott, Turnbull; Turnbull, Nielson; Howard, Costello; Hawke, Keating; Lathan, everybody; Howard, Peacock; Fraser, Howard ...

    • rufus says:

      12:28pm | 23/02/11

      Who are Nielson and Lathan?

    • TheRealDave says:

      02:08pm | 23/02/11

      They were from the Typo Party

    • Faz says:

      05:27pm | 23/02/11

      D’oh. My bad, Rufus.

      LOL TRD

    • Cunegonde says:

      06:13am | 23/02/11

      I am not of a particular party sympatizer: whoever is more honest and progressive will do me. However, what Kevin Rudd is saying is true:AWU are thugs; majority labor party leaders are corrup. Latest Obeid $8.5 mil home. How can “poorly politicians"afford such property?Mr Obeid, who earns $130,540 a year as a backbencher, is the identity behind the purchase of one of Sydney’s luxury waterfront properties. At $8.5 million-and there is more…. I cannot believe voters are still prefering Julia and labor party. But I dont believe Rudd is thief like the rest of them.

    • Paul C says:

      07:55am | 23/02/11

      You are so right Cunegonde, most Labor pollies are typical communists. Preach a fair go for the pheasants, while they line their own pockets with the loot.  Number one rule, keep the workers below the poverty line and therefore dependant on easy to get welfare and your own gravy will continue to flow. My advice to people, if you want to get ahead in life, tear up your union card-they only use your fees to prop up their political party.

    • Tom says:

      08:20am | 23/02/11

      Well said Paul C. I am all for “a fair go for the pheasants”.
      The rest of your analysis is also right on the wing.

    • H. Simpson says:

      08:54am | 23/02/11

      Mmmmmmm….pheasant…...

    • TChong says:

      09:27am | 23/02/11

      Paul C, thats funny.
      Labor politicians line their pockets with loot ?
      really? They are actually stealing?
      Its a wonder the LNP machine hasnt made a big deal about that .
      Or maybe thats just a meaningless lie?
      Keep workers below the poverty line is a Labor tactic, because they are all commies?
      Pahleeze!
      Dont take all your talking points from the HR Nicholls society,and Bob Santamaria, they are stuck in the 1950s, just like your post.

    • Paul C says:

      10:15am | 23/02/11

      You should try it sometime Tom, I was once a Union Shop Steward - so I have seen both sides.  It is better on the Right, my career and life has improved a lot since then.  The union did nothing but hold us back - Just like Labor is doing to the whole country.  I was shocked to find out the obscene proportion of our union fees that was going directly to political advertising. And the procession of Union Organisers getting plush appointments in the Labor Party ranks - No experience or qualifications necessary.  That’s how we end up with useless people in the parliament - take a look at the Labor Cabinets around the country - most people beyond Leader and Deputy Leader are unknowns.  Everything is controlled to ensure that word doesn’t get out that the actual minister is unqualified.  Take the new Minister for Finance and The Arts - Rachel Nolan - Started her degree, but didn’t finish - yet they put this woman in charge of an important portfolio - What other evidence do you need?

    • Julie K says:

      10:25am | 23/02/11

      OOOOOhhhh a personal comment from the famed “TChong”  - Paul, You must honored.  Pity it is just like all the other comments he/she files - pointless.  Paul, your comment is spot on.

    • hermes says:

      10:49am | 23/02/11

      Agreed. I think Rudd is the best of the bunch, and because he didn’t go along with their schemes, was dumped. Lindsey Tanner was also an honourable man…which is why he resigned. Bet he couldn’t stomach Gillard, Swan and their incestuous Unions.

    • PTom says:

      10:59am | 23/02/11

      Paul C

      How many failed business people are in the LNP? So what was Abbott qualifications to run Health?

    • TChong says:

      11:02am | 23/02/11

      “Famed” ? Julie K ?
      I am grateful , ,but in all modesty,
      Hey Jules, instead of acting like a toddler chucking a tanty, if you disagree with what I say, fine, let me know.
      Why dont you try posting something ? Do you have any opinion about anything ?
      Otherwise…,

    • Silent Observer says:

      11:19am | 23/02/11

      Yet another pointless post from TChong ...........

    • John A Neve says:

      11:48am | 23/02/11

      Paul C,
      As I am only learning, please tell, what is a “typical communist”?
      I won’t comment on your feathered friends, although I prefer chicken myself.
      In this age of super,perhaps you could tell us who is a “worker” and who is a boss?
      Unions; if they had never existed, I hate to think what this country would be like.

    • Tom says:

      12:14pm | 23/02/11

      @Paul C, apologies for the “pheasant” thing. Everything else was pretty close to my own past experiences as a union member. They are parasites. At least you flushed out some staffers and union drones.

      @PTom, I would have thought that Abbott being a Rhodes Scholar was not a bad start. What has your girl got?

      @Silent Observer, just factor it in. TChong is having a few challenges of late.

    • Paul C says:

      12:59pm | 23/02/11

      @Tom , Yeah shame about the “pheasant” thing.  Feel like a bit of a fool after reading the post once I sent it - but too late then.  Just goes to show you can’t always trust spell checkers on mobiles.

    • Steve Woy Woy says:

      06:56am | 23/02/11

      Poor old Mal… controlled by the thugs and the factions of the Murdock media.. Is that all you can write about!! a man in your position who is closer to the truth of things than most… or at least you lead us to believe that!! It must be very disheartening to have to write down drivel like this when you know so much more, all because of the thugs and the factions of right wing press jockeys. Stand up to them Mal write what you really want to write, write what you know in your heart of hearts to be true, not some concocted hand me down push from the mountebank Howardites…
      If only others had the same work ethic as K. Rudd. or are you also instructed to write it KRudd!!!

    • Pete from the city says:

      07:59am | 23/02/11

      what sort of malarkey is this Steve? You reckon Mal is told what to write…you’re not even vaguely right son, you’d better lay off whatever they’re serving up in Woy Woy

    • Mal says:

      08:14am | 23/02/11

      Is there a truth being hidden?  We all know the truth.  I pity the “man” who, because of his ego, pathetically stays on in a party which didn’t just replace him, they treated him like pus.  Hanging around taking crappy potshots from the sideline is ego winning over substance.  He truly was and is the emperor with no clothes.

    • Faz says:

      09:42am | 23/02/11

      Geez Mal, I thought for a minute you were talking about your namesake who’s gone all quiet ... for now. But, of course, if Abbott continues to stumble as badly as he did in the last couple of weeks, Mal will not move. Will he? He just came back from being ‘treated like pus’ because ... err ... civic duty ... serve the party ... serve the country! ... etc.

    • Reg says:

      11:50am | 23/02/11

      @Mal…“we all know the truth.”  This is fun. Sort of a Timmy or a Ryan moment talking to themselves like ....

      Like all the slimy advertising gurus who manipulate our children and use their political connections to ease the way into advertising excess that pulls the community down to the lowest level that the f***ing right-wing faux-liberals will permit. Depending on the magnitude of the bribes of course.

      How’s that? I could go on making stuff up but some would fail to understand.

      Such an unappreciative lot these faux-liberals, after all the good their Prime Minister Mal the Trouserless did for them and they still keep choking on their bile about him. wink I reckon all these little indicators point to a serious underlying problem with self-esteem, probably well deserved too.

    • Mal says:

      03:51pm | 23/02/11

      I confess that I don’t understand, Reg.

    • Steve Woy Woy says:

      04:53pm | 23/02/11

      @Pete… I’m sorry your right he just prints it straight from the fax memo’s.. There is no free independent press in this country, they are singing from the Liberal hymn book, and unfortunately the majority of the posters here appear to be happy to swallow it intact and without question. All one sees in the press whether online or in hard copy are button-pressing sensationalist (and frequently inaccurate or misleading) punchy headlines intended to create an irrational response - and here you all are - responding as expected. Why oh why is it so hard to find independent thinkers - who are able to keep an open mind and discuss matters under the assumption that the press have an agenda of their own and therefore should not be entirely trusted? thugs and factions come in many forms oh father Pete even under different banners also like BHP, Palmer payrollsystems and the like.. AWB and Brethren donations to name just a few…. I know what I’m on Dad and clearly your a graduate of the Dumbing Down Of The Nation Programme From JWH Egonomics school!!

    • MarK says:

      05:09pm | 23/02/11

      Reg is like that Mal.

      Here I will translate for you.

      Reg doesn’t like conservatives. No reason of course. Just don’t like us. He once heard the term faux used in conversation. Since this sounded cool he likes to call conservatives faux-liberals (he really doesn’t understand what he is saying). He is taking “liberal” back for the progressives. Why?........Who cares.

      He then continues on his original them of “I don’t like conservatives so there”.

      Actually that pretty much describes this post of Reg’s and his past and future posts. Not understanding Reg is in fact par for the course. The general gist is as described above. I like Reg. He is funny, repetitive, but funny.

    • NicoleG says:

      05:32pm | 23/02/11

      @Mal, good luck with that. Nobody can ever understand old Reg. He just waffles.

    • Flexo says:

      07:07am | 23/02/11

      Rudd never had the talent to be a PM. Say what you will about Howard, he was in for 11 years and incharge. Rudd over-extended himself and over-promised and under delivered together with toxic ‘friends’ like Julia, led to his demise. Gillard isn’t really in charge if you believe what Bob Brown and the Independents have to say. Rudd knows what is wrong with the ALP from corruption to lack of dedication. Rudd also knows that the ALP is slowly losing ground and base support. At the end of the day it is the Australian people that pay the price. It is too late for Gillard, maybe in 30 years the ALP will finally become the political party that people will respect and trust.

    • Reg says:

      07:59am | 23/02/11

      Agree.

      Rudd will probably go down in history as the prime example of how not to be a PM.

    • Reg says:

      01:29pm | 23/02/11

      Hardly, that honour would go to Lord Alexander Downing the Inept.

    • Tedd says:

      07:18am | 23/02/11

      “He points out that the union’s actively Christian leadership worked to get an atheist for Prime Minister.”

      It had nothing to do with extra-parliamentary, extra-terrestrial beliefs and allegiances to or against them.

      It was all about displacing a very dysfunctional leader with as smooth a transition as possible with an election looming and a need to avoid short & medium term instability perpetuated by that dysfunction.  Gillard had proved that by filling in effectively when Rudd was flitting round trying to rule the world.

    • Tom K says:

      07:24am | 23/02/11

      Good piece, Malcolm. It’s sad that he can’t get over the bitterness, but it’s good that he’s in a foreign affairs portfolio that needs a workaholic like him. In a world increasingly unravelling, Under the circumstances, I believe a foreign minister should be allowed to make as many phone calls and flying visits as necessary.

    • Tony of Poorakistan says:

      08:16am | 23/02/11

      I don’t disagree with this comment but I will say that I hope he is not wandering around trying to shore up support for another tilt at the UN Security Council. The last one, with Richard Butler and Alexander Downing, was embarrassing enough.

    • LauraBoBaura says:

      03:08pm | 23/02/11

      Tom - would you get over your bitterness if you got knifed in the back infront of the entire country/world? I sure as hell wouldn’t, but then again I’d never be a politician either.

    • Huey says:

      07:44am | 23/02/11

      Rudd has certainly been freed from the shackles of factionalism. When he was deposed I..like many others…  thought he would not contest the next poll.  He hung in there, embarassingly so I thought.  He may appear lonely but hopefully he is a stalking- horse for the anti-factional elements within the party.  A bitter,resentful, righteous, rich, workaholic, who can command media centre stage at whim and has a lot of public sympathy is bound to make things interesting.

    • Henry says:

      07:48am | 23/02/11

      “Instead, he looked like a man who planed to sue for breach of promise.”

      Planed? You having another dig at his travel expenses there Mal?

    • casba says:

      09:09am | 23/02/11

      Clever proof reading there Henry….well picked up and spotted, at Journo Mal’s expense! What a shame we can’t sue him for breach of promise- promise to always be fair and impartial when reporting the political side of the news, promsie never to push his own political agenda which, sadly, has become de rigeur for the Canberra Press Gallery. Peanut Gallery is more like it!

    • Gary says:

      08:13am | 23/02/11

      “You would be financially wrecked if you had the telephone bill of Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd… “
      Try SKYPE - unlimited calls to 40 countries worldwide - $15.99 per month.

    • nossy says:

      08:44am | 23/02/11

      Its Rudds own fault Malcolm - what ex PM would want to step down to take a lesser role just to remain on the public purse ? He should have departed politics gracefully and found a job elesewhere. Could you ever imagine a Whitlam, Fraser, Hawke, Keating, Howard if they were in the same positiona s Rudd was as an ousted PM , ever staying and taking a ministerial role? Nice chap but “not as other men” ! Fortunately in the latest Newspoll Ms Gillard has pulled out a massive lead over the poor chap that is attempting to lead the Coalition. Gillard on 53% as PPM and poor old “shit happens” on a sinking 31% !

    • Cunegonde says:

      12:24pm | 23/02/11

      I know I know, nossy, but at least Kevin is WORKING whereas the rest of the iliminaries club AND their families are sponging off us! And what of GG state and Federal? What a joke and expensive handshake ; I honestly detest these nobodies.Macquarie street,hello! imagine rent and personal assistance, stationery and free travel-hmmm- best job/business under the sun. What was I thinkin 30 years ago?Must have been economically sedated. I feel sorry for Kevin, though; he was elected and forced upon me.

    • Tom says:

      12:37pm | 23/02/11

      He stayed on to help his party at the time. Had he gone, Abbott would have probably picked up a couple more seats.

      What inducement was made to Rudd to stay on? Well you tell us Nossy, you are a paid spin doctor from the inner sanctum.

    • Jim says:

      08:44am | 23/02/11

      I’ve always thought KRudd was a smug, arrogant little man that struggled with the concept of honesty…but I’ll give him this much; he has always, at every step in his meteoric rise to the top, had plans and contingencies in place to cover his arse. He got caught out with the factional heavies who are using Juliar as a puppet, but never discount one as devious as KRudd.

      I did not feel sorry for him at all, he joined a party notorious for stuff like corruption, factions, union control, he knew they owed their existence to the socialist greens. He will have his revenge, he would have already started planning it through the tears last year. It will be long in the making, but spectacular in it’s release!

      I have the popcorn ready smile

    • Christine says:

      09:13am | 23/02/11

      Leave him alone ,he is doing the best after public humiliation ,how would anyone cope. Its easy to run away and lick your wounds ,he is standing his ground and still serving his country . He is just the wipping boy when there is no news.

    • Barney says:

      09:18am | 23/02/11

      Kevin Rudd would most likely have been elected for a second term, except thanks to the fear of the unions, we’ll never know. A second term would have strengthened his position and maybe have inspired him to act on the things the public wanted him to act on - eg climate change. His first term seemed to be going smoothly until the climate change debacle took some of his authority away and then the knives were out. Thanks, mainstream media. The unions then got scared and took matters into their own hands.

      After the climate change backdown it was going to take a lot for the public to take him seriously. However, younger people I think still had faith in him and faith in the idea of change, hence his current popularity. We all love an underdog. We all also voted for him, so we want him back.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      09:38am | 23/02/11

      I have always thought that Kevin Rudd’s lack of popularity among his less autonomous colleageus was one of his most appealing traits.

    • grumpy old man says:

      09:41am | 23/02/11

      I have absolutely no time for our current bunch of politicians, and total contempt for the likes of Obied who have managed to line their own pockets at the expense of the rest of the population.
      Having said that, I suspect that history will actually paint KRudd n a good light, not for what he has done thus far, but for what he will do in the future. Nothing teaches like adversity and he has certainly had his share , at least politically. As a wealthy man, he has no concern about where his next mortgage or car payment is coming from, and appears to be focusing intently on his role. I think he is learning valuable lessons and , much as it pains me to say it, will probably prove to be one of the better foreign ministers we have had.

    • BL says:

      09:43am | 23/02/11

      I dont know how anybody can have respect for a man who was dumped and treated like absolute sh** by his own political party, yet STILL stays with them. It shows he has no respect for himself or his beliefs and is just there so he can get a job at the UN meanwhile wasting hundreds of thousands of Australian tax dollars to ensure he eventually gets the UN job. He is nothing but a wimpy, scumbag.

    • persephone says:

      10:04am | 23/02/11

      Er, perhaps he believes in what he’s doing? And thinks that what he can achieve as a member of the government is more worthwhile than what he can achieve elsewhere?

      He doesn’t need the money, after all.

      And, btw, he DID get a job at the UN!

    • ZSRenn says:

      10:17am | 23/02/11

      @ BL You might be alone on this one. How many attempts did John Howard have before he was elected PM. They used to call him the Come Back King., I cant remember exactly and I don’t have the time to google it but I think he must have been displaced as leader of the Coalition at least 3 or 4 times and kept on keeping on. Then served as PM for 11 years. I think Aussies like someone with the gumption to fight it out. Kevin Rudd may have the battle but the big question is. Has he lost the war?

    • Syl says:

      11:02am | 23/02/11

      Actually I think this shows that Rudd has absolute respect for his beliefs, as they are in line with the Labour Party.  If he had no respect for them he would have spat the dummy and run off, ignoring his convictions.

      I think Rudd was possibly the most hopeless PM we have had (possibly because Gillard is doing a good job of gaining that title) but I have to commend the strength of his convictions. 
      He believes in what he does and is willing to suffer immensely to show that.  Even though I completely disagree with his political views, I have to respect him for sticking by them.

    • ZSRenn says:

      02:20pm | 23/02/11

      “.......may have LOST the battle but the big question is. Has he lost the war.

      Mental note to self “Do not post when in a hurry!”

    • Cate P says:

      10:00am | 23/02/11

      He’d have won if he’d had the guts to call a double dissolution election in Feb 2010 after ETS legislation rejected; he’d have lost if he’d gone to term.  He let his opportunity go.

    • shirley breen says:

      10:30am | 23/02/11

      I think Kevvy is doing a good job and thank God for the females at the helm in Aussie politics during these tumultous times

    • hermes says:

      10:44am | 23/02/11

      I think Kevin Rudd would have led the ALP to a PROPER election win, not some cobbled together coalition between the socialist greens and loony tunes like old beardy. I think Kevin Rudd was dumped, unfairly, by the right wing faction, obsessed about polling, and due to the Machiavellian machinations of Gillard and Swan. The mining tax wasn’t his idea, it was Swan’s; the debacles of the BER etc, were Gillard’s. Who, after all, reported how “bad, nasty and disliked” Kevin Rudd was…goodness, it was the people in the ALP who dumped him. Who has the most to gain from spreading stories about him? I’d take all negative comments about Kevin Rudd, particularly coming from the ALP, with a very large pinch of salt. I’m generally a Liberal voter, and I’d vote for Kevin Rudd any day…the only time I’ll vote Coalition again is if they dump Abbott for Hockey or Turbull, and the only time I’d ever vote Gillard, would be if hell froze over.

    • TheRealDave says:

      02:29pm | 23/02/11

      And to think Tony ‘Shit Happens’ rAbbott was this close—>.<—to have led the Liberal Party to a PROPER win without some cobbled together Coalition of inbred farmers and ‘maverick’ independents.

      And by ‘Maverick’ I mean even wackier two headed inbred farmers.

    • Jacket says:

      11:11am | 23/02/11

      Let’s hope that Rudd extends his vision, that his party colleagues “can say whatever they want, wherever they want, free of any fear of intimidation”, to those humble Australians who have a well founded concern about our naive acceptance of a fractured cultural conglomerate as valid replacement for our time tested and successful Australian culture.

    • mary monica roche says:

      11:27am | 23/02/11

      Even at his worst, Kevin Rudd (KRudd) is still, Farr and away , a much better political leader and a much more popular political leader than Tony Abbott (TABBOTT)

    • Holly says:

      11:49am | 23/02/11

      Goodness Mal, what a ‘savage’ piece, to use your own term.  Once again another bright spark in the Australian media claims to have psychological insight into Mr Rudd’s psyche.  Are you clairvoyant, or just nasty?  Explain HOW you know what he thinks.

      Mr Rudd seems to be getting on with his job and trying to make a difference. That he harbors criticisms about Paul Howes etc,  is understandable.  But it was Howes who published a nasty little booklet pouring venom on the guy who put the ALP in power after 12 years.  BTW, if it was so easy, why hasn’t anyone else in federal labor been able to do it?

      There have been thousands upon thousands of articles, talk-shows and radio discussions critising the former PM.  Rudd-bashing has become a national passtime and now the guy finally stands up for himself, and he gets abused for that as well.
      We should commend the guy for continuing to serve his country after being ousted in such a humiliating manner.

    • Rosie says:

      11:57am | 23/02/11

      Mr Farr what else did you expect Rudd to do? He is the only member of the Labor Gillard govt that is doing his job honestly because he has no choice but to be himself and try to do for Australia what is required from a Foreign Affairs Minister, One thing with Rudd when he is on TV speaking to the public he is seen to be himself speaking honestly on what he believes in and would be nice if we were given the message from Christchurch from him and not the PM. Gillard has had her say and that is enough. The woman is so fake with with her trying to look and sound sombre that we have become immuned to what she has to say.

      Rudd maybe lonely but am certain is the only member of the Gillard Govt that has no guilt about his job! Good luck to him.

    • Rob r Charteris says:

      12:14pm | 23/02/11

      Red Rosie dribbles again “The woman is so fake with with her trying to look and sound sombre that we have become immuned to what she has to say.” and it does get much better than that. Are you sure you’re not a spurned wannabe lover, but you found Gillard didn’t lean that way? you seem obsessed with the girl.

    • Reg says:

      01:40pm | 23/02/11

      There is nothing so nasty as a woman critical of another woman. Especially of one whom the critic regards as unjustifiably above her station.  Now had it been Mrs Rudd, dear Rosie would have been more kindly on the basis that she is a made woman of worth. What a SNOB.

      Shades of the condescending Mrs Thatcher. wink

    • Andy says:

      12:25pm | 23/02/11

      As much as I don’t like Rudd, he is the only one in the Government that seems to know what he’s doing. The others seem too be like a bunch of school kids with no teacher.

    • Helena says:

      12:37pm | 23/02/11

      Rudd still looks and sounds like the Prime Minister.  Julia looks like she’s still trying to graduate from acting school. Palm out front, slow scripted speech, deep droning voice, all very noticeable acting, not Prime Ministerial though.

    • Against the Man says:

      03:11pm | 23/02/11

      Good thing Gilltard isn’t the ‘real’ PM smile Hail ALP Corruption!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Robert S McCormick says:

      12:27pm | 23/02/11

      During the 1990s John Olsen did to Liberal Premier, Dean Brown, based on one or two poor polls, exactly what Julia Gillard did to Kevin Rudd. Both Olsen & Gillard, to satisfy their own personal ambitions, stabbed the ‘elected’ Premier & Prime Minister in the back. OK, we don’t actually elect people to those jobs but it was they who led their Partys into Government.
      Not that SA politics, politicians & the Parliament here are of any importance but doubtless Dean Brown felt bitter at having his position usurped.
      It is no wonder Kevin is bitter & savage. This is the man who single-handedly took on John Howard & thrashed him. Gillard did nothing & continues to do nothing. This is the man who was deceived & lied to by Gillard. It was Gillard who, repeatedly, said that “The Prime Minister (Kevin Rudd) has my Total Support & Loyalty” for months,weeks & days before she orchestrated his political execution, an execution carried out for one & only one reason: To satisfy Gillard’s over-riding ambition.
      She did not do this for the good of Australia or, indeed, for the irrelevant good of the ALP. She did this for Julia Gillard & Julia Gillard only. She may well have won nothing more than a meaningless Pyrrhic Victory. She may well find herself out on her arse after the 2013 Federal Election. She may even find herself out later this year or early next year. Hell slap it into her.
      The surprising thing is that despite being bitter & savage he has stayed with the ALP. He could just as easily, as Gillard would do, having-won his seat last August, simply resigned from the ALP & moved to the cross-benches where he could have wrought untold & unestimated damage on Gillard. He could have, & should have, bestowed on Gillard the only legacy she deserves: To be the only Australian Prime Minister to be in office for one day.
      That he has stayed loyal to all those in the ALP who deliberately destroyed him is to his everlasting credit. That they should turn their backs on him is to their eternal shame.
      I did not like him as Prime Minister, then I don’t like most Socialists.
      I would prefer Rudd as Prime Minister a million times more than what we’ve been lumbered with in Julia Gillard.
      We can only hope that, if the back-room boys in the ALP do not politcally assassinate her as they helped her do Rudd later this year or early next, at the 2013 Election the predictions of so many political commentators, both Right & Left, turn out to be true & the voters kick her out.

    • jo says:

      12:28pm | 23/02/11

      To all you people bagging Kevin Rudd, Lots of people didn’t vote for Labour, because of the ruthless way they replaced him, and I am one of those people who didn’t vote Labor, 
      Also Wilkileaks cables stated, that Mark Aribb was discussing kevin Rudd being replaced, a year before it actually happened, to america. And we only found out overnight. 
      Why should he do all you Kevin Rudd bashers, a favour and get a job, out of Labour, He has nothing to be ashamed of, he is a decent and intelligent person
      Looking at all the blunders of the julia gillard government, I can see that it was his team that were incomptent not him,  Labour are the people that should be ashamed. they removed a sitting elected government. they had no right to do that, we the australian people should of had the right to decide who we wanted as our government. 
      Its a shame people believe all the spin that is written about Kevin Rudd,  He is doing a great Job, and is the only real talent labour has, Anyway has anyone noticed that Labor started going downhill since they replaced Kevin Rudd.  julia gillard is serving her purpose, until bill shorten gets in. one of the guys who assisted in his removal.

    • Tripper Smurf says:

      01:17pm | 23/02/11

      The modern Labor party would do well to listen to the anti-factionalism of Rudd and give the voice back to those who are actually elected.  Whatever else you say about the man, he does have that right.

    • Cunegonde says:

      03:46pm | 23/02/11

      as I said previusly, Kevin works and behaves like a statesman. Unlike old arrognat worse PM ever, Malcolm Fraser! I must have had vitamin deficiency when voted for him! Mind you I was young and easily led!
      And cannot stand shifty Julia but only because she just oozez with dishonesty and selfimportance.
      Bet Kevin Rudd gets back his old chair. And so will Turnbull. I dont mind having selfmade milioners on the board- it gives me hope!!!

    • hermes says:

      05:31pm | 23/02/11

      yup, agree with you Cunegonde; detest Gillard and Swan. I voted Labor 07 because of Kevin Rudd, couldnt bring myself to vote for anyone in 10…hey my choice was between Peter Sleeper (eeeuuw mr bean) and Chris Cummins (aka minister for nothing). God forbid, even the Greens were better. Come on Kevin Eleven.

    • che guevara says:

      07:37pm | 23/02/11

      its obvious that fidel castro is no longer leadership material

    • coz says:

      07:48pm | 23/02/11

      “He points out that the union’s actively Christian leadership worked to get an atheist for Prime Minister.”

      Krudd is a churchian, not a christian.

    • michael j says:

      11:32pm | 23/02/11

      You would be financially wrecked if you had the telephone bill of Foreign
      well i still believe taxpayers and voters pay for rudds phone bill,,but i do believe that in 4/5 short years Dubbs and his crew have totaly rooted this country,,
      what missey PM GILLARD is surrpose to be doing is any body’s guess,,
      Rudd has his own agenda and it doesn’t include australia ,,,but it would be bloody nice if he paid his own phone bill,,,,,,and i would have gone on a hunger strike for a week to see RUDD ask the same question Tony ABBOT
      was Shit happens Kev don’t take it out on the ones who voted for ya,,,,
      or put you second anyway,,,,,,,,

    • CHA says:

      10:07am | 24/02/11

      Rudd seems to be having trouble understamding that the Labor Party wants him out - they just want to see the back of him but he can’t or won’t get the message.
      Having him out of the Country - no matter what expense to the Taxpayer - is the next best thing for them.
      If I were Joolya I would be more worried about being mooved back then moovin forward - Rudd will be sharpening the knives to get even and then she will become another ex Labor Leader.

    • Natalie says:

      01:17pm | 24/02/11

      Maybe with all this travel RUDD is trying to get a gig on GETAWAY -that is if his chances at a NATO job go down the drain - I mean what can this guy really do - nothing - no skills base what so ever! But he is very good at travelling on others people money

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter