While pregnant, I remember gazing at the slim, lissome models in the posh maternity wear catalogues and wondering if they were going to give birth to a basketball instead of a baby.

The kind of stuff you'd expect from pregnant models

Those graceful elongated elks seemed to inhabit an enchanted forest a world away from mine. They wore clothes I couldn’t afford to buy. They were tall, slim and had beautiful round compact baby bellies. I was short, squat, perspiring, and afflicted with varicose veins in unmentionable places.

But it never occurred to me that these catalogue women posing in the chocolate Toorak wrap dress ($269.99), the Point Piper aqua tee ($69.99) or the Double Bay print pant ($99.99) were not actually pregnant.

In fact, it’s a relief to discover that many of Australia’s leading maternity fashion houses commonly use non-pregnant models with a prosthetic bump stuffed up their shirts (a $129.99 Peppermint Grove cotton waffle weave of course).

As I report in today’s Herald Sun, designers say maternity models are hard to come by, despite the fact that there’s now an Australian modeling agency offering nothing but expectant models.

It’s a relief because I realise now that the pregnant women that made me feel frumpy and inferior were almost certainly faking it.

It’s a total con because the shape of even slim women change when they are pregnant.

Even if you don’t put on much weight, your boobs fill out and your hips become more curvy. (That’s if you’re lucky: most pregnant women retain more water than the average camel, get ankles the size of boab trunks, and wave goodbye to their shoelaces at the start of the fifth trimester.)

As Amanda Cox from the brilliant website realmums.com.au told me yesterday, the glam look of these models “does not reflect the mismatched, elastic-waist pyjama look that is the reality” for most pregnant women. Too right.

Women are really sick of looking at pictures of women in the media that have been digitally altered without acknowledgment, and this is no different.

Maternity houses using non-pregnant women as models should be encouraged to declare their deception for the mental health of all of their customers.

In any case, you’d think that using real pregnant women would be a good marketing strategy and basic commonsense.

If they started using real women and sold a few more clothes, they might be able to bring down the cost of the garments. This might mean they could start naming the clothing ranges after suburbs we can actually afford to live in for a change.

When you see the Broadmeadows maternity sundress ($7.99) or the Paramatta crop pant ($11.99), we’re probably getting somewhere.

Most commented

48 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Bill says:

      12:49pm | 22/03/12

      Pregnant women are beautiful and I dare anyone to say otherwise.

    • Mattj says:

      01:00pm | 22/03/12

      You know there are magazines for that Bill.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      01:08pm | 22/03/12

      Otherwise.

    • SimonFromLakemba says:

      01:11pm | 22/03/12

      Well not if they are fat and ugly

    • Al says:

      01:17pm | 22/03/12

      Actualy Bill, it depends on the individual women.
      A women doesn’t suddenly become beautiful just because she is pregnant with no consideration of if she was beautiful beforehand.
      As such, pregnant women are not necasarily beautiful.
      Have I met your dare?

    • Woodsy says:

      01:31pm | 22/03/12

      Based on the above comments, it’s fair to say:
      Al - 1
      Bill - 0

    • Nick says:

      04:26pm | 22/03/12

      I’m with you Bill

    • neil says:

      09:27pm | 22/03/12

      Pregnant women are vulnerable and needy which makes them appealing to their impregnator, their blood relatives and other women who sympathise with them.

      To everyone else they are fat and unavailable, they are moody and demanding. So not beautiful not sexy.

    • Inky says:

      01:03pm | 22/03/12

      Otherwise.

      I just can’t help myself when you taunt me like this.

      But on a serious note, even if they used actual pregnant models, it’s not like they wouldn’t be digitally touched up beyond recognition to achieve about the same result as what you’re seeing now. All you’re really doing is trading an easily accessible/obtainable model type for a niche, which will only drive costs up if anything.

    • M is for Moderation says:

      01:04pm | 22/03/12

      Mmm I’m still trying to figure out who’s buying those size 8 maternity short-shorts I saw on sale one day…

    • Nick says:

      02:53pm | 22/03/12

      I guess if they were on sale then nobody is but if it was anybody it might be my wife…our youngest is nearly three and she’s very fit but she hates any pressure on her adomen so she still wears maternity shorts and trousers if they look nice.

    • Belinda says:

      01:13pm | 22/03/12

      Otherwise

    • A real women says:

      01:17pm | 22/03/12

      I’m sure there are plenty of gorgeous pregnant girls out there who could model maternity clothes. I know a few girls at the moment who look sensational and would do maternity fashion proud. Plus, they have real babies in tow not polystyrene. Get a grip fashion houses. Women want real models not real skinny ones.

    • Lexi says:

      01:20pm | 22/03/12

      Good on you Bill smile

      I’m less offended by the obvious fake bumps in maternity catalogues and more offended at the Jenny Craig “you’re a crap mum if you haven’t lost the baby weight in a month” ads. As if seeing Miranda Kerr (who probably has nannies, personal trainers, nutritionists and chefs at her beck and call) bounce back into her size 0 jeans isn’t rubbing our noses in it enough (well, it’s not Miranda rubbing our noses in it, it’s New Idea, Women’s Weekly and all the other trashy mags obsessed by celebs’ weight)!

      For goodness sake Jenny Craig, give new mums a break - we have enough on our plate without you trying to create societal expectations and new norms of postnatal weight loss. Way to ruin the best time of your life - obsessing about what size clothes you fit into.

      Our priorities should be caring for our beautiful babies and being happy mums.

    • Lauren says:

      01:35pm | 22/03/12

      It’s funny, the other day I was reading Mx on the train ride home after work and there was woman who wrote in in response to another readers comment about working whilst having an infant at home. This particular woman took offence, stating “if you really loved your child you would be at home with them, not working”.

      Hilarious!

    • Gomez12 says:

      01:22pm | 22/03/12

      WHAT!?!?!?!

      Models being used to sell things that aren’t actually like the people who buy them??? I AM OUTRAGED!!. This has never happened before!!!

      Right up until this very moment, everytime I wear clothes I look exactly like the male model wearing them. The ripped abs, the glistening torso, the magestic hair, the lot.

      And now I have to face a world in which the models for maternity wear might, in some cases, potentially, not be pregnant. However will I cope….

    • JT says:

      01:29pm | 22/03/12

      I agree Gomez12, this is outrageous. Next they’ll be telling us the food in commercials is fake!

    • ScottB says:

      01:25pm | 22/03/12

      Susie - I thought you were talking about human type females then but you were clearly referring to elephants when you mentioned “at the start of the fifth trimester”. That would be the start of the thirteenth month and elephants carry for 24 months don’t they? From memory my wife carried our children through three trimesters for each one.

    • Brian says:

      01:47pm | 22/03/12

      Even elephants would only have three trimesters… each trimester would just be 8 months long. I suspect it was an attempt on humour which will be lost on many and confusing to most of the rest

    • M says:

      04:40pm | 22/03/12

      I just thought she couldn’t count.

    • gobsmack says:

      01:25pm | 22/03/12

      Excuse a comment from an ignorant male, but I would have thought that when you’re pregnant the latest look in designer clothes would be one of the last things on your mind.  “Maternity fashion”!?  Who are you trying to impress?

    • Lauren says:

      01:40pm | 22/03/12

      Well what else are they going to wear? When you gain 20 pounds of baby weight your normal sized clothes aren’t going to fit anymore are they?

    • Inky says:

      02:10pm | 22/03/12

      @Lauren

      Pretty sure gobsmack wasn’t suggesting pregnant women don’t need clothes.

    • gobsmack says:

      02:32pm | 22/03/12

      Correct, Inky.
      I would have thought that being pregnant would free a woman from the tyranny of having to look fashionable or even attractive for that matter.  It’s not like a woman who is seven months pregnant will be going out clubbing.

    • iansand says:

      02:57pm | 22/03/12

      I reckon that, if your body is basically out of your control and doing weird things on a daily basis, what you wear and how you look is one thing that remains within your control to give yourself a fillip.  But I’m a bloke too, so I’m probably wrong.

    • Lauren says:

      03:21pm | 22/03/12

      Thank you Inky, because that was not at all what I meant.

      I’m saying that just because you’re pregnant doesn’t mean you don’t want to feel nice. And for most women, LOOKING nice makes them feel nice. Saying that just because you’re pregnant means you shouldn’t want to feel attractive is ridiculous. In fact, at the end of a pregnancy is when a lot of women feel the most unattractive. They’ve been lugging around all this extra weight for 8 months, their feet have swollen, they can’t even sit down properly anymore - I’d say that is about the time were a nice dress that DOESN’T look like a potato sack would make the world of difference.

      And the OP wasn’t necessarily talking about “designer” clothes either - could be the local target catelogue for all we know. Which is where my original comment stems from.

    • Ooh shiny says:

      08:07am | 23/03/12

      You might be shocked to find out that some pregnant women actually have a job to go to, and they work up until a few weeks before birth. And most jobs have some kind of dress code. You can’t just turn up in tracky dacks and a nightie, even if you are pregnant.

    • maggie says:

      09:31am | 23/03/12

      Stop acting like women do things just to impress men. People dress to express themselves and because they feel more comfortable and confident when they look nice. Anyway maybe they also want to look nice for their partner or their family, just because they’re not trying to look sexy for random men doesn’t mean they don’t want to dress smart.

      Some women actually feel very attractive when they’re pregnant too. It’s not like we all turn into frumpy messes when we get pregnant sometimes it feels great.

    • Anna C says:

      02:06pm | 22/03/12

      God I’m sick of hearing pregnant women whinge about everything. No one forced you to get knocked up.

      If this is the full extend of your problems Susie then I think you should consider yourself lucky.

    • jess says:

      04:19pm | 22/03/12

      uhm actually some people are forced. but that’s a different issue.

    • Reality Girl says:

      07:45pm | 22/03/12

      jess

      yes, some women are forced however, in australia they have a choice to do something about it

      totally agree anna c, its not like you don’t know going in that you are probably going to look like a little round elephant by the end of the experience (most australian women anyway), the fashion houses are trying to sell their clothes, they put them on models who look unrealistic, this also applies to non maternity fashion as well

      time to stop whining about it and don’t buy the magazines or pick up the catalogues, if magazines don’t sell, they won’t get ads

      but no, we women pick up the magazines by the millions to read the latest gossip and read what someone else has to say about how we should live our lives and then we bitch because the advertising models don’t look real

      my ex-husband didn’t look like johnny depp either (always a source of disappointment to me) but really, magazines, tv and films are about FANTASY, not reality

    • maggie says:

      09:35am | 23/03/12

      You have a baby, then we’ll see who’s complaining.

    • HD says:

      03:11pm | 23/03/12

      Wow, that’s a pretty touchy response to an article that is in no way being sold as hard hitting journalism (sorry Susie, I’m assuming you weren’t going for a big expose here…)

      Yes, we have a choice and we continue to go back and get pregnant over and over again.  Yes, we complain about this and that and occasionally some of it makes it into these sort of articles but your comment leads me to believe that you have never complained about a hangover that you caused by making the decision to drink to excess?  You’ve never complained about a blister caused by a pair of shoes that you made the decision to buy even though they rubbed a little?  Would I be right in that?  Somehow I doubt you have that much restraint.

      Perhaps there is something else that is bothering you?  Because if it’s just that pregnant women complain all the time then you can make the decision to not read articles related to such issues.

    • Anna C says:

      02:10pm | 22/03/12

      Why do women these days feel the need look sexy even when they are pregnant?

    • Lauren says:

      03:26pm | 22/03/12

      I am loling at your comment.

      God forbid a pregnant woman wanting to look nice! How dare she!

    • Ooh shiny says:

      08:13am | 23/03/12

      Who said “sexy”? How about “dress code” - scandalous, I know, some pregnant women still WORK! Not everyone has a luxury, or even inclination, to sit on the couch in they PJ the moment pregnancy test comes in positive.
      Another thing that may shock you - some pregnant women continue feeling sexy, even after they get knocked up. And even more mind-blasting - their partners find them sexually attractive still! Amazing!
      See, that’s what’s wrong in the world. Women stopped using sex just for procreation, and started enjoying it. Apocalypse in 3…2…1…

    • Scotchfinger says:

      09:51am | 23/03/12

      Why do women feel the need to look sexy even when they are not pregnant? Why do they feel the need to look sexy at any time after leaving their teens behind? Beats me, but who is complaining? Apart from Kika, who disapproves of any show of Female Flesh as a contravention of Sharia Law…

    • Eleanor says:

      02:17pm | 22/03/12

      “fifth trimester”

      huhwhat?

    • Al says:

      03:48pm | 22/03/12

      Sure, thats when most people would call them between 3 and 6 months old or 3 to 6 months after the birth. Not sure what it has to do with disappearing shoelaces though?

    • Trude says:

      07:16pm | 22/03/12

      One of the problems with using fake bumps is that the dresses will not sit so nicely on women with bigger boobs and hips. Using real pregnant models means the customer knows how the dress is really going to look.

    • Datman says:

      09:12pm | 22/03/12

      It is absolutely amazing how the slightest issue concerning women gets voiced by the media. Oh my God, maternity models are wearing fake baby bumps? How will women ever survive?

      Women are treated like delicate little flowers by our media, and if you think that you are a strong, independant woman with the world at your feet , then sit back and listen as the Australian media tells you what a victim you are and watch as they come rushing to your defence when they see anything that might offend you.

      I cannot wait for the day that we have a major study of our media, and hopefully its patronising and sexist attitudes will be recognised and someone will do something about it.

    • neil says:

      09:13pm | 22/03/12

      Give it up Susie, 33 responses here, 16 on your HS blog. Nobody cares! What are you suggesting, dyed blondes cant be used to advertise shampoo? Models with spray tans can’t advertise Queensland? Actors can’t pretend to be mechanics in car insurance ad’s?

      Get a grip, this is just irrelevant to everyone, pregnant or not.

    • Jem says:

      10:13pm | 22/03/12

      Sorry, you thought the models were really pregnant?  I’m kind of stunned.  It has never crossed my mind that the models would be pregnant.  Just like the people in ads probably aren’t really pregnant, and don’t love whatever product they’re trying to sell.

      It never affected my mental health while pregnant.

    • Matt says:

      07:47am | 23/03/12

      Susie, I think the government should pass a law so that only models who are actually pregnant can portray pregnant ladies in advertisements. In fact, I would go further and apply the same law to movies, television shows, theatre productions etc.

      The mental health of literally dozens of Australians is at risk. The government can’t bury its head in the sand, it must act now!!!

    • Watermelon Smuggler says:

      10:51am | 23/03/12

      In Cosmo Pregnancy the models are really pregnant. It’s visible, and they even say how far along each model is. It’s really quite a relief to read. That is until you see the prices of the clothes they’re trying to sell. $200+ for a dress you’re only likely to wear for 6 months is a bit rich.

      Maternity clothes are incredibly frustrating. I need a plain black collared maternity business shirt that I can wear to work, but can’t find one anywhere. And if I did manage to find one, odds are it’d be out of stock, or not available in my size, or it would cost me a weeks pay. And yes it has to be black, to substitute the uniform I ordinarily wear, because they don’t have maternity uniforms. Sigh.

      Yes I chose to be pregnant, but it’s not exactly feasible to obtain a baby any other way. So it’s just another one of those things about pregnancy that you learn the hard way when it happens to you.

    • T says:

      11:06am | 23/03/12

      I am friends with several high fashion models who have had children now (and like Miranda Kerr and other Victoria’s Secret models they shot maternity brands while pregnant and then went straight back to work in lingerie and swimwear shows after giving birth). They all kept their figures during pregnancy and truly did look like they just had a basketball in front. I believe it is because they took such amazing care of their bodies through healthy eating and excercise BEFORE pregnancy, DURING pregnancy as well as after pregnancy. That is why they were all back to work within 6-8 weeks of giving birth with no stretch marks or loose skin and defined abs.

    • Robert Smissen of country SA says:

      11:14pm | 23/03/12

      That’s nice for you, but other than these “virtual women” do you know any real women?

    • sandra says:

      11:49am | 23/03/12

      I think the problem here is that items are almost being misrepresented in adverts. No that isn’t new but it shouldn’t be acceptable. Many pregnant women work and need to look presentable, the clothes have a limited life and are generally expensive for something you only wear for a short time.  It would be nice if how an item looks in an advert was a little closer to reality. Disillusioned shoppers tend NOT to spend as much money.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

KRudd gives marriage equality folk hope, but odds still against it passing on June 6. http://t.co/QmQffMkSvH

Malcolm Farr

ACL says gay marriage would lead to gay sex (how to do it) being taught in schools. You really haver to credit them with vivid imagination.

ToryShepherd

Welcome to your wombiverse. On orgasmic births and being so happy you could cry http://t.co/7JrbQSCV6j

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @GordyPls: So much is wrong with this article but the last setence is absolutely astonishing http://t.co/IpoXoCiN8Y

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter