All this baby talk is enough to make your hair stand on end.

Look down- do you have a uterus?

Yes? Good luck with that, because no matter what choice you make concerning that particular piece of bodily real estate, you will be criticised, harangued and nagged by the media, the medical profession and friends. Whatever you choose to do with it, or the fates lump you with in terms of partners and fertility, you’re going to have to justify your decision with greater rigour and intellectual vim than if you were contemplating voting for the Democrats.

Dissenting opinions are fine and dandy, but when it comes to this particular topic, its not that everyone has something to say, they think they have every right to say it loudly and bang on about it in several thousand word essays.

And this particular curiosity has only become more apparent in the past week or so as a scuffle has broken out online with the digital commentariat busying spilling their lattes onto their keyboards in their haste to join in the fray.
It started with Cameron Diaz, who in an interview with Cosmo, eschewed the “All I want is a dog and husband to make me perfectly happy” line and unashamedly admitted that she is not sold on the idea of joining the ranks of Mum-dom. Sacrilege! To openly, confidently assert that she’s not sure about whether she wants kids was tantamount to dancing naked on the grave of Mother Teresa.
But, Cam went further, suggesting that to even utter such thoughts was taboo, adding, “I think women are afraid to say that they don’t want children because they’re going to get shunned”.
In a time when a baby or six, (preferably one from each continent and named after New York suburbs- “Here Bronx! Brooklyn! Little Upper East Side!”) are the accessory du jour and hipper than the latest Marc Jacobs bag, it takes some guts for a woman to admit that getting knocked up is not on her to-do list.
Then from across the Atlantic, British journo and Guardian scribe Polly Vernon got stuck into the melee, defending the actress and agreeing that women who openly admit their lack of interest in having kids are seen as unnatural and transgressive. Vernon has some personal experience of this particular spat, after having penned a highly contentious article earlier this year outlining why she had made the choice to not have children.
In a follow-up piece published this week, Vernon writes that the reaction to her initial piece was “terrifying. Emails and letters arrived, condemning me, expressing disgust. I was denounced as bitter, selfish, un-sisterly, unnatural, evil. I’m now routinely referred to as “baby-hating journalist Polly Vernon”“.

For Vernon, we live in a time “when popular culture fetishises parenthood in general and motherhood in particular.”

Motherhood isn’t every girl’s cup of tea but to admit as much, you might as well suggest you spend your Saturday night’s torturing kittens. To not want children and to publicly acknowledge this position is to invoke bewilderment, anger and downright disbelief.
The lesson is, bring up issues around reproductive choice and watch the mayhem ensue because every man and woman armed with nothing more threatening than a keyboard thinks they have every right to get stuck into the fray.

But let’s say you do fancy getting sprigged up, and voila, welcome to an even messier, bigger fertility fracas.

Say you traipse across the vodka-stained terrain of finding Mr- You’ll-Do- To- Get- a- Mortgage- and- Get- Knocked- Up- With; say you find a way to momentarily quell notions of a career and any semblance of burning ambition; say you stop guzzling wine and eating soft cheese and decide you are willing to sing ‘The wheels on the bus’ 6,568 times you will still be getting it wrong according to various concerned quarters who will happily explain your shortcomings at length.

Firstly, chances are you will have left it too late. 25 or older? Sorry dearest, you’ve missed the most fecund window because you were too busy pretending to read University texts and getting a foothold in the professional world. Research published last week by The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists in the UK so very politely points out to young women they’re busy wasting their most fertile years in the errant pursuit of other pesky pastimes like a career or education.

And when you think you’ve heard enough from celebrities, doctors and journalists, there are the environmentalists to contend with. Forget V8 guzzlers as the prime suspect in depleting the ozone layer- the carbon footprint of babies is what we should be truly concerned about.

In the UK an environmental lobby group has set up the “Stop at two” pledge to try and save the planet, one less sprog at a time. “Every additional human being is increasing the burden on this planet which is becoming increasingly intolerable” says Jonathon Porrit, head of the British government’s Sustainable Development Commission, “I think we will work our way towards a position that says having more than two children is irresponsible.”

Even your very desire to have a child will be called into question, with there being plenty of thinking that children are little more than a selfish piece of lifestyle accoutrement.

This argument goes, there are billions of children in the world, many of whom who have not been whisked out of poverty by Brangelina or Madonna, and to wantonly add to that number is pure self-indulgence.

A very good friend of mine with no plans to even come within a spermatozoa’s length of having a child, resents that he will have to, by way of taxes and the occasional birthday present, pay for his friends’ children. He sees children as a choice, something you consider acquiring like a house by the beach or the entire first series of the West Wing on DVD.

He does not see my willingness or that of his coterie of female friends of relative fecundity as something generous or giving, but a selfish, wilful want, like demanding a new pair of heels. Why, he argues, should he fork out to pay for our reproductive whims?
Ladies, you’re damned if you do get up the duff and you’ll be demonised if you don’t.

So, I propose this- give up. Stop defending whatever reproductive bandwagon you’re on, and stop explaining why you’ve decided to get knocked up or not. Revel in the fact that you have a choice about what is right for you and that you have access to a whole heap of pretty impressive medical science to help you get there.
But dear god, please don’t tell try and tell me about it.

Most commented

10 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • T.C. says:

      07:27am | 26/06/09

      Can women actually ‘look down’ and see that they have a uterus?

    • Lexi says:

      09:36am | 26/06/09

      “resents that he will have to, by way of taxes and the occasional birthday present, pay for his friends’ children”

      I love this argument. How does he like the reverse of it - when he’s retired and expects taxation to support his pension/healthcare/nursing home/$2.50 pensioner public transport/subsidised rates and car rego etc etc etc is he going to expect those children who he was too stingy to buy a bloody birthday present to pay taxes to support him?

      What goes around, comes around.  We actually NEED future taxpayers to pay for us (LOL and care for us!) in the future.

      I don’t have kids - yet - but I am so tired of hearing about how I’m leaving it too late (hello, it’s not just up to me) and how bad the current generation of parents are… Like previous generations, we are doing the best we can in the circumstances we find ourselves.

    • Nico says:

      09:44am | 26/06/09

      Upon ‘reproductive whims’ rest the future of the human race. Two or less is a good idea tho.

    • Kate says:

      09:46am | 26/06/09

      ah, it’ll never stop. endless interest. my thoughts have changed 1000 times on the topic and im only in my mid twenties, no doubt they’ll change 100 more before i decide what’s right…. then change my mind again.

      *sigh*

      WHOSE DAMN BUSINESS IS IT ANYWAY!?!?!

    • Jörn says:

      09:59am | 26/06/09

      I like the environmental argument…  Maybe our fearless smiling national leader - Kevin07 - could channel some of the benefits parents get to those who chose not to reproduce.  That way he gets to stimulate the economy and push trough some of the environmental changes he promised us, without having to commit Australia to an expensive carbon trading scheme.

    • Ford says:

      11:30am | 26/06/09

      Lexi - Are you actually delusional enough to think that by the time those of us in our 20’s will have a taxpayer funded pension (regardless of the birthrate)?  Seriously?

      Look, I’m putting my hand up right now as someone who’s very much like Diaz.  I’m in my late 20’s and I have absolutely zero desire to reproduce.  I hate kids.  I love my life.  And I’m also perfectly happy to live with a husband and a couple of pet dogs! 

      But I’m also sick of being told “you’re an incomplete person if you don’t have kids”.  It’s neverending.  I think I live a very fulfilling life.  I’ve studied what I wanted to study.  I got a PhD.  I get to travel the world.  I have an awesome job (and while the pay may not be spectacular, it allows me to lead the lifestyle I want).  This is the life I want, one of freedom.  I don’t want to be tied down. 

      I’m childless and happy.  People need to get over that.

    • Deliberately Barren Jezebel says:

      08:31pm | 26/06/09

      Lexi, I too love this argument,  his tired preditcable and very old “taxpayers of the future” meme trotted out by parents these days.  You are claiming children are a public good. So then it makes no sense to inflate the PRIVATE wealth of parents with taxpayers’ cash. If children are a public good, then parents should be offered public services for their children. Take for example the baby bonus. It is akin to giving $5000 to 1000 high-school students to spend as they please rather than giving $5m to a school. 
      Parenthood is a personal lifestyle choice, with costs and consequences, rewards and sacrifice. Provided fertility can be controlled,  having a family is just as much a valid choice as not having one. That is children are a private good and their benefits are enjoyed mostly by their parents.
      It is true that those who have families have may have less discretionary income, less free time, and more “responsibilities”. However, if the rewards of doing so were not also great, why would so many people do it? People who choose to have children are making a private choice that should not burden people who choose not to have children.  Penalising middle-class childless households to cash up middle-class childed households may be good politics but it makes no economic sense. It seems that the redirection of income from the childless to the childed is, at best, pork barrelling and highly inefficient. At worse, it is bald social engineering that seeks to reward those who fit the preferred social mould and punish those who have the termerity to dodge the bullet.

    • Madison says:

      08:21am | 27/06/09

      Damned if you do, damned if you don’t ... how very, very true!  I was one of those rare 20-somethings that said they didn’t want kids who actually followed through on that (I’m 43). However I find myself also partner-free now, and what I find on the tragic middle-aged dating scene is that men never extract themselves from that old Madonna (mother) vs Whore (child-free) way of thinking, so at some point I found I had to concoct a story about how I “couldn’t have kids” lest they tarr me with the slut brush again, assume I eschewed motherhood for a life of hedonism and debauchery, or accuse me of being anti-family.

      I am not anti-family, but I don’t believe the traditional family unit idea works for everyone. I don’t believe you should pop kids out just to give you “a purpose” in life.  That little dream can turn into a nightmare.  I should never have to justify my choice.  All my life I rejected my mother’s notion that womanhood equals martyrdom.  I wanted to enjoy my life, the way I never saw her doing.  But unfortunately, even now, I think society only respects us if we adopt that role.  Suffer, sacrifice, or slut.  What can you do?  Seems the only solution is to follow in old Chastity Bono’s footsteps and get a sex change!

    • Bekker says:

      07:59pm | 27/06/09

      this article’s great, and i agree. it’s hilarious how people are still putting their two cents in through the comments.. as though “don’t try and tell me about it” was actually an invitation to debate about it some more.

    • Catherine says:

      09:54pm | 10/07/09

      I completely agree with you. I am now in that 25+ bracket. Gee. Women around me - my age and much younger - are all getting married and having children. I have been in a long term relationship for over 3 years and not a day goes by that my partner does not get harassed about when he will propose to me. I am studying (for my 3rd qual admittedly) and have no real intention of either getting married or settling down right now. I get tired of answering the question. My uterus = my decision. But in saying that, I do realise society’s pressure is only going to get greater. My father used to tell me about how much pressure he had on him when he was in his late 20’s (in the 70’s) to settle down and get married. He was “unusual” for not having kids at 18. So my dad was 33 when I was born. I consider my parents more experienced and wiser for having had me later, as they were far more emotionally ready to deal with children and all the PROBLEMS associated with them. So in my view, its something I think I would want to be a bit older for. So I can give my kids more from my own life lessons. This experience is surely something I will remember.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Lucy Kippist

RT @HeatherSmithAU: Can living in another country change your life for the better? by @lucyjk on @newscomau f. moi http://t.co/E5Ma3kBut2

David Penberthy

@mooks83 sophisticated response. Think the kids parents saw it differently

David Penberthy

More class from 9's footy show, lampooning a baby that allegedly looks like Sterlo with a pic swiped from Facebook http://t.co/BGoYP6Pn68

Lucy Kippist

A story that's close to my heart - can living overseas change your life for the better? With thanks, @Alisa_reduxhttp://t.co/n6tksJstqs

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter