Treasury secretary Ken Henry should spend less time hanging around with hairy-nosed wombats and more time talking to working families in suburban Sydney.

Ken Henry saved this western Sydney wombat from a burrow slated for a Macquarie Bank toll booth


That’s not to bag wombats, especially hairy-nosed ones. Nor to question the right of anyone to take a holiday, and to do what they like with their leave.

As Dr Henry said last year amid criticism of his five-week wombat-rescuing odyssey into Queensland’s far-flung Epping Forest National Park, there are 10 times as many pandas in China as there are hairy-nosed wombats in Australia.

These wombats are endangered.

But they’re only marginally more endangered than the average family budget will be - nowhere more so than in Sydney - if Ken Henry holds sway with his muddle-headed proposal for new road taxes and congestion taxes to discourage people from their reliance on cars.

And if it’s good enough for the bloke who oversees the nation’s finances to spend 35 days crawling through wombat holes, the least he could do is come out of his burrow in Canberra and spend maybe a week in Castle Hill, Campbelltown, Liverpool, the Northern Beaches and the Shire to discover just why Sydney has no choice but to drive - and is already paying through its own hairy nose to do so.

In releasing his tax blueprint last week, Dr Henry said he wanted to encourage lateral thought and creativity about how Australia generates tax revenue. He said it could be possible to make our big cities less brutal and more liveable by embracing innovative reform. He said that he wanted to encourage debate, which can only be a good thing.

But as part of that debate, I’d humbly counter that when it comes to Sydney, don’t even think about it, as it is much too late to overlay some conceptual framework inspired by boutique towns such as Copenhagen or Portland on a mess of a joint like Sydney.

A few key points here which, sincerely, would be beyond Mr Henry’s grasp because he spends no time living here:

- Sydney residents are already paying more than they should for road services which were once run by government, but have been shamefully gifted to one of the greediest parts of the private sector, toll operators, which as The Sunday Telegraph established last week have consistently increased user charges above the rate of inflation. These tolls have the same effect as taxation, except they save the government from spending money on a service, and (excessively) reimburse the private sector for doing so.

- As Four Corners demonstrated two weeks ago in its commendable potted history of this city’s transport woes, thousands of Sydneysiders live in suburbs which are not serviced by viable public transport at all. As infrastructure fails to keep pace with urban sprawl, working people are left with no choice but to drive - and generally, to pay more than they should for the privilege.

- The areas that are served by public transport are marred by over-crowding, untidiness and, on a number of routes, unreliability. Using the tax system to force more people onto buses and trains which are at breaking point (or just broken) would only make things worse. 

- As The Daily Telegraph established on Monday, the State Government does not have a single co-ordinated plan to address the seemingly permanent hotspots which plague the basin. Two cases in point: the current desecration of Iron Cove to let motorists spend about seven seconds going like the clappers on a double-span bridge (before returning to gridlock) and the utter chaos being perpetrated with the interminable widening of the M5 around Campbelltown and Hoxton Park.

Unless Dr Henry is trying to find ways of generating less tax revenue - unlikely I would have thought in his line of work - his ruminations about road and congestion taxes can have only one result in Sydney.

That is, to charge people more for using cars which they are forced to use by the absence or inadequacy of public transport.

(That’s not to labour the other little point that, unless you’re an inner-west vegan with no kids and a love of light rail, the only way to get to the school and daycare and the shops and soccer practice and home again to get dinner on is with a nice big station wagon.)

Dr Henry obviously has a national role and much of what he says could apply in less congested and more functional parts of Australia, certainly in my old home town such as Adelaide, where the city is served by a more reliable transport service, where cycling is a less suicidal option than in Sydney, where the whole place is much, much smaller.

Not here.

It’s surprising that no-one in the Rudd Government has ruled out his transport tax talk. You’d have to think that Sydney hardheads such as Anthony Albanese and Mark Arbib, the instinct politicians who have Sydney in their DNA, will take Rudd and Swan aside at some point and discreetly advise them to ice this part of the Henry plan.

It is difficult to envision a more direct attack on the million-odd people who read this newspaper every day.

The people who will suffer the most under the models Dr Henry canvassed are tradies in white vans, men and women who run small businesses, and suburban and outer suburban families - that is, about 95 per cent of the readership of The Telegraph.

These are hard-working people who already pay far too much money to use toll roads which the city has been re-designed to funnel them into, by a hapless RTA at the behest of a criminally incompetent state government.

All of it to line the pockets of privately-run companies such as Macquarie Bank which, this year, to avoid any fallout from the lingering backdraft of the GFC, are forcing guests to their lavish Christmas parties to agree to keep the details confidential, lest they suffer any public wrath at seeing just how much of your daily road toll can be pissed up against a wall, a nice glassed wall with harbour views, at a lavish five-hour swim-through somewhere down at the Quay.

Sorry Ken, but a one-off save the wombat levy would be better received in this city where we’re already paying too much to drive to and from work at roughly the same speed as your hairy-nosed friends.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

44 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • John A Neve says:

      05:59am | 21/10/09

      The whole concept of taxing at different levels, different parts of our lives is inequitable. As such taxes of this type will always be divisive.

      This will be are second tax review in twenty years! So why, Oh why won’t our governments look at and debate a Financial Debits Tax?

      Maybe because it will be more equitable and we would all pay our fair share

    • Dan says:

      06:07am | 21/10/09

      You may very well be right in your criticisms of his proposed tax, but to be fair, he’s a public servant. It’s up to the government to decide whether or not to take it up. Henry’s job is to enact policy and to make recommendations; it’s up to the politicians to detemine whether or not these recommendations become law.

    • Keith Orchison says:

      06:31am | 21/10/09

      Just back home in Castle Hill after a week on business in Denver, Colorado, and reminded all over again how a half million people in Sydney’s north-west have been dudded by generations of pollies. As Four Corners showed, this area is wholly without rail and,what it didn’t say, is going to add an urban area the size of Canberra in the next 10-20 years. Without a good rail service, what is already a right royal pain for commuters will get very much worse. Imposing a car tax without a viable public transport alternative is dumb policymaking. In any event, out here we are already taxed for going in to the CBD—up to $15 in road tolls daily for a trip that is about 90 minutes each way in the peak periods.

    • watty says:

      06:53am | 21/10/09

      DAN,
      Are you are telling me that Ken Henry is not the Treasurer but just the Head of a Department? May even come as a surprise for Henry.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      07:07am | 21/10/09

      Doesn’t matter how you slice and dice the tax system, the rich will pay less through tax minimisation and tax evasion and the PAYE taxpayers will take the brunt, as usual. Don’t mention equality and tax system in the same sentence…

    • Matt says:

      07:19am | 21/10/09

      Well said David.  Inner-city smarties get a light rail they don’t need and don’t want at exhorbitant costs while long-suffering central coasties like me get smashed again. Bye Bye Belinda.

    • Grog says:

      08:07am | 21/10/09

      Nice scare campaign David.

    • Paddy says:

      08:19am | 21/10/09

      Where does Ken Henry live? In Canberra?
      The only city in Australia where there is sufficient budget for everything its inhabitants desire. There are no tolls, there are no clearways, it is almost Utopia.

    • Elle says:

      08:32am | 21/10/09

      I have two comments for Mr Henry.
      Firstly, I will be delighted to travel by public transport rather than car when the NSW State Government can provide a RELIABLE service (although I am on the North side so ANY service would be appreciated). I have a child to collect from after school care by 6pm. The only way I can guarantee to get there from the city is by car.
      Secondly, I will be cheerfully sending a bill to the NSW Government for my services. I am a full time, long term foster parent. I have to work to support my foster child and myself. The ‘allowance’ I receive is a pittance of what is required to give my foster child the life now needed and deserved. So I will send through my bill, which by current calculations is in the order of $15,000 per annum. Fair is fair. I am providing essential services pretty much free of charge for the State Government. More importantly, I am breaking the cycle for a child in a dysfunctional family, and teaching the child how to live a fulfilling and loving life.
      User pays goes both ways.

    • Johnno says:

      09:00am | 21/10/09

      Where’s the solution Penbo? Keep driving? It’s all very well to bash the public transport system (I’m prone to that myself), but to suggest that driving is ok is ridiculous.

      Come on Penbo - you owe us more than this.

    • Alex Sanchez says:

      09:07am | 21/10/09

      Whoa - just hang on a minute. Before we publicly flay Dr Henry, pay him some due respect and actually read what he had to say. Dr Henry makes two, absolutely, compelling points. The first is that perhaps, and just perhaps, there are better ways to fund road services than petrol excise and motor registration. One of them may be road pricing another congestion taxes. So, he wasn’t saying that you stack one on another but that you relieve one mix for the other. Simply, he doesn’t want a “new” tax lobbed on the other taxes - he wants to find a better way. Nothing wrong with that - unless you like paying taxes on petrol etc, which I am sure many don’t.

      The other point was this - and this has been completely missed. That advocates of change (and Dr Henry would include himself in this) need to make sure that the case for change is compelling and that it takes into account equity (including ensuring the “winners” of change can resource and support the “losers” of change). Here Dr Henry was giving us some advice - before you argue for a cut in tax here or there, think about who loses out. And maybe, just maybe, think about what the taxes could be used for - such as for public transport for example.

      So, far from giving Dr Henry a serve we ought to be saying - nice one, well done. And before anyone gives me a serve for nothing more than being in his corner, I live in Canberra North - or better still, a suburb of South West Sydney. (Meaning I know a bit about the M5 and the South western Sydney Train lines and certainly more than those who are champions on my behalf but get apoplexy getting out to Glenfield station). And for what it’s worth, I would happily swap anything in the world to have him as the Premier of NSW.

    • RT says:

      09:10am | 21/10/09

      Dr Henry is right. Sydney’s private car commuter addiction can’t continue. It needs the fix of massive improvement to public transport however the NSW govt doesn’t have access to the necessary funding, whichever party is in office. This is best funded through taxes on car commuters (of which I am one).

    • westie says:

      09:22am | 21/10/09

      RED KEN strikes again. . .

    • Tim says:

      09:36am | 21/10/09

      Ha Ha Paddy,
      You obviously haven’t been to Canberra in a while. Now you may be a bit out of the loop but you do realise the ACT was forced to have self goverment in 1988. Where is this magical money for Canberra you speak of?
      The budget is well and truly in the red.
      The only government who comes close to the incompetence of the NSW government would be the ACT government supported by their coalition partners the ACT Greens. These two set new standards for stupidity.

    • Micko says:

      09:44am | 21/10/09

      Kind of cheeky for the Federal Government to suggest a congestion tax for Sydney, the most congested city in the country, with 20 per cent of the population, received only 1 per cent of the $22 billion in national infrastructure Australia funding. 

      Meanwhile every other state gained a major public transport project fully funded by the Federal Government – what did Sydney get? A piddling $100 million for a “feasibility study” into the West Metro rail line.  Clearly the feds would rather spend $1.5 billion on a freeway to Branxston which we probably don’t need.  Thanks a bunch.

      It appalling that the feds were able to get away with dudding Sydney on the flimsy argument that the NSW Government submission was not up to scratch when they were perfectly prepared to throw $42 billion at a National Broadband Network without three pieces of paper or who knows how much for school Halls with no due diligence whatsoever.

      It is doubly appalling that they seem to have gotten away with it – the day after the infrastructure announcements I expected outrage from our local screamer – the Daily Telegraph – instead they fell for “me too” lets blame the State Government that everyone hates anyway line.  How boring…

      Before the Federal election Rudd came to Sydney and specifically acknowledged the need for additional infrastructure funding…especially for transport…so far he has delivered absolutely nothing for this city.  He should be held to account.

    • Poseidon Burke says:

      09:45am | 21/10/09

      Surely we are loading up our available infrastructure with a population that it cant support. We are on a treadmill where population grows the economy (but not necessarily GDP per head) and to argue for a lower net migration is to be anti economic growth. Shouldnt we be increasing GDP per head though increasing productivity, slowing rates of immigration and rebuiding our infrastructure?

      I think tax reform is fundamental to this agenda. There is nothing fundamentally sound about the current taxes applicable to cars and roads.

    • Milson says:

      09:47am | 21/10/09

      Why do I keep getting this felling “Ken Henry” runs the country??????

    • Jerry says:

      09:52am | 21/10/09

      Rudd does what ever Henry tells him,  Kevin doesn’t actually make any decisions if you notice over the past 2 years. That way if it doesn’t work he can blame old Ken.

    • Dave says:

      09:55am | 21/10/09

      Albanese and Arbib are part of the usless NSW ALP that has failed to deliver public transport.  Of course they will not want a light shone on the incompetance of their bedefellows.  In fairness though the people who would be most hurt by this proposal are the same fools who have kept labor in power in NSW for all these years so frankly its hard to feel sorry for them at all.

    • Bob says:

      09:57am | 21/10/09

      Get over yourself Rudd, your becoming very anoying!

    • Chade says:

      10:02am | 21/10/09

      Milson: because Ken Henry has had to, for the last 13 years? He had to do everything for Costello…

    • Carl Palmer says:

      10:02am | 21/10/09

      Well said David.

      As a Sydneysider, getting around anywhere by car is a pain in the ass. How the government and the RTA keep getting it wrong is mind blowing. I occasionally use the M5 and I keep asking myself who was the dimwit who came up with the idea to make it a 2 lane motorway. We were and are constantly told that Western Sydney is rapidly expanding and growing phenomenally yet the government of the day delivers a “solution” that would have been more appropriate for the traffic loads we had back in1980.

      I spent a little time in Perth last year and was impressed with what they were doing. They were building 3 – 4 each way motorways with a train line in the middle.  I wonder what the M5 (or any other motorway) would be like if it was 4 lanes each way with a trainline in the middle.  In Dubai with a population of1.5Mil they are doing the same, 4 – 5 lane expressways however in Sydney with a population of about 4Mil we build 2 lane motorways. Go figure.

      I won’t even go near the cash back scheme of which I’m a beneficiary.

      In Europe for example train travel is not cheap and nor should it be. Why? Because their trains are modern, clean, on time, comfortable and well run. Some of them go really really fast. I guess you get what you pay for. Here in Sydney / NSW / Australia? Let’s skip the NSW basket case.

      Yes there is a difference between Australia and Europe and each has its own set of challenges but we seem to get it more wronger that they do. Someone in government has to take a long term view of our infrastructure needs and have the balls to implement.  If we have to spend the money, then spend the dam stuff because the place is growing with more people not shrinking.

      Regarding the congestion tax – Dear Mr Henry, I think you have it the wrong way around - the congestion we have is due to POOR GOVERNMENT PLANNING not the increase in cars.  The place is growing with more people not shrinking. Get this right and we can talk then about how it is funded.

      Penbo, funny you should mention “criminally incompetent state government” and “Macquarie Bank” in this article, I wonder who was running the government and is now working for Macquarie Bank?  I’m been screwed now, aren’t we all silly wombats.

    • Gerald says:

      10:41am | 21/10/09

      In all fairness Chade -  Costello had brains and could think and speak for himself, unlike the dumb Rudd Robot Goose, Swan is.

    • DG says:

      10:44am | 21/10/09

      Here’s a curve ball with no costing or any other assessment (but guaranteed to annoy drivers) - make public transport tax deductible (when used to and from work). Suddenly there is a real incentive to go out of your way to get on a bus/train/ferry rather than punishing people for using their cars.

      Offer a benefit for a certain behaviour and people will adopt the behaviour (see the baby bonus) - making people pay more for something that they are already doing will have a less direct affect (see increased tax on pre-mixed drinks).

      Now I appreciate that it is the feds that deal with income tax while the State is responsible for public transport but, as a novelty, how about the two work together in the best interests of the peace, order and good Government. i.e any increase (above CPI) in the revenue from trains goes to the Cth in repayment for the tax break offered to get people on trains. Now that would really show whether the priority was getting people on trains or increasing revenue.

    • laurie says:

      10:58am | 21/10/09

      In 1970 I lived at Randwick and caught buses to Bondi Junction or to Taylor Sqare to connect further buses. Down Cowper Street I would watch 20 320’s pass me with no spare seats before I could get on. Also the 314 to Double Bay would pass me in Avoca Street full to the brim and I would have to wait another 15 minutes for the next one. To get to work on time you always allowed an extra 30 minutes to get a seat. I wonder what its like now.

    • laurie says:

      11:10am | 21/10/09

      Further regarding my comment on bus services in 1970 I have been back in Tasmania since 1971 and have been a municipal councillor for 16 and a half years. As I have just retired I am not catching buses to work.  But in my life’s experience I am amazed at the mistakes that government’s repetitively make in doing what has failed before. The recent stimulus package will show up some doozies. Investing the stimulus in infrastructure was probably not populist enough Imagine how good a fast train to Melbourne-Sydney would be. Save second airport needs and link inland towns and cities. Oh well would nt meet the electoral cycle I suppose.

    • Marek Bage says:

      11:19am | 21/10/09

      “Boutique towns such as Copenhagen or Portland.”?

      Oh Please!
      Try cities like Milan (1.3 million people), Singapore (5 million) and London (7.5 million).

      Nice strawman, though.

    • Margaret Gray says:

      11:28am | 21/10/09

      Here’s an idea…

      Ban anyone living within 5km of the CBD from using public transport and owning a car.

      Let them walk/cycle to work and rent a car if they to need use one.

      Too hard you say?

      This utopian public transport fantasy is the sole province of cloistered academics and public servants, both of whom know precious little about rapid transit systems and the economies of scale required to make their stupid and ludicrous schemes viable.

      Any real proposal gets shouted down by a procession of special interest groups and NIMBY’s who threaten violence and dissent to any form of progress.

      Try getting a transport tunnel or overpass built in Melbourne…BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      Public transport is anathema to government.

      Cars are here to stay.

      Deal with it.

    • jonathan says:

      11:37am | 21/10/09

      Margaret:  I live within 5kms of the CBD, dont own a car and cycle/walk everywhere.  I get places faster and for less cost than my friends with cars.  Your suggestion is brilliant, although I would just say we should do what London did: put in a congestion tax for the city and then spend every cent on public transport improvments. 

      Sydney’s transport is rooted.  I’m making a genuine effort to keep my life as localised as possible.  That means living close enough to work to ride everywhere, thereby negating any of these traffic issues.  I hope to never own a car again…

    • boden says:

      11:55am | 21/10/09

      Anyone arguing for more private transport (cars) at the expense of public transport should take a trip to LA. It’s basically the logical end point of low-density car orientated ‘city’ living and it’s a disaster. Or Phoenix in Arizona.

      Sydney needs to abandon the 50’s post-war idea that every family needs a huge house with a backyard. Higher density is a viable option and should be encouraged to meet the needs of our growing city. Living in an apartment doesn’t mean living a terrible life. Looks at all the sitcoms Australians consume by the millions: Seinfeld, Friends, How I met your mother etc for inspiration.

      Unfortunately Australians are wedded to the idea of a backyard and spending their mornings and evenings stuck in a car which is why we need to discourage private car ownership through taxes. As long as those taxes lead to increased public transport services, of course.

    • Margaret Gray says:

      12:18pm | 21/10/09

      Jonathan,

      Whilst your intentions appear noble, the quality of your lifestyle is very much dictated by what happens beyond your inner city ring fence.

      Where your argument breaks down is that goods and services into your chosen postcode need a route by which to travel.

      Preferably the most direct and efficient.

      Milk doesn’t miraculously appear on the shelves at your local Whole Foods Market

      Neither does Double Pressed Cold Extra Virgin Italian Olive Oil.

      Diverting funds from roads into public transport is mindlessly stupid, considering buses run on them as well as trams.

      For a bigger laugh, consider it takes longer to travel from Melbourne to Sydney by train than it does to drive….HILARIOUS.

      “...I hope to never own a car again…”

      That’s great news and a terrific sacrifice so we can travel from unsurpassed transport ‘hubs’ like say Warrandyte to Seddon by car much more quickly.

      I hope also that you’ll be giving up flying too, as that is the most destructive form of public transport on our fragile planet.

    • Margaret Gray says:

      12:24pm | 21/10/09

      “...Living in an apartment doesn’t mean living a terrible life. Looks at all the sitcoms Australians consume by the millions: Seinfeld, Friends, How I met your mother etc for inspiration…”

      Whatever became of the HUNDREDS of small children that regularly appeared in those sit-coms?

      Endorsing the lifestyle of childless, vain and narcisstic kidults is hardly a valid argument for high-density inner-city living.

      Seven million New Yorkers would also agree with me.

    • shabangabang says:

      12:40pm | 21/10/09

      A couple of things I don’t understand:
      Why do 50 storey high rises built in the CBD need parking spaces for 200 cars? People live there for the convenience. No parking should be included in the design of these towers.
      Why do the buses run the length of the CBD? They should come into the city, pick-up/drop off, turn straight around, then bugger off back to the suburbs. It takes upwards of 30-40 mins to travel 2.5km from Circ Quay to Central during peak hour, longer than it takes to walk the same journey.
      Why are the idiots who choose to live in the western suburbs the first to whinge about roads and lack of public transport. Try choosing to live in the inner city. Not a problem in the world.
      Why do NIMBY’S living in new apartment buildings in Green Square opposing more apartment buildings being built in Green Square.
      Why are NIMBY’s living in Kuringai Council (and some bone-headed’celebs’ who don’t) whinging about higher-density living in an urban area? Don’t like it, leave. Gosford it just over the river from you.

    • ShaneO says:

      12:58pm | 21/10/09

      DG -  Encourage behaviour through some form of positive reinforcement???!!!!!

      Are you barking mad!!!

      Lets extend this madness:
      Medicare reduction if you maintain a healthy lifestyle.
      Car registration credits to encourage safe driving.
      Financial incentive to reduce carbon output rather then a new tax.

      “Now that would really show whether the priority was getting people on trains or increasing revenue.” – I think you have answered your own question!

    • boden says:

      01:00pm | 21/10/09

      Margaret: Are you trying to tell me people in New York don’t have children?

    • Mr Pastry says:

      01:02pm | 21/10/09

      @ Magaret Gray - quality comments as always Margeret - but do not always agree.  The quote you used condemns itself   “Seinfeld, Friends, How I met your mother etc for inspiration…”  Inspiration from TV shows, how deep.

    • Chade says:

      01:17pm | 21/10/09

      Gerald: don’t make me laugh. “dumb Rudd Robot Goose”? Work on your invective. Plus, Costello is as ideologically blind as the best of them - check out any of his columns in the past three months.

    • ShaneO says:

      01:20pm | 21/10/09

      Mr Pastry in Margaret Grey’s defence she is quoting from another blogger’s comments (boden says:12:55pm 21/10/09). That comment is not hers.

    • Capn Bligh says:

      02:06pm | 21/10/09

      Bit of a laff, this, really.

      The coalition is in fact looking right down the barrel of another 25 seat swing, and one of those is very likely to that of the right honourable member for Wentworth, that battler Eastern Suburbs, Malcolm Bligh Turnbull.

    • jonathan says:

      03:23pm | 21/10/09

      Margaret Gray:  My choosing not to drive benefits everyone, including you.  If everyone decided to live and work locally (yes, it is a choice) then the roads would be cleared up for the trucks bringing in my milk etc.  Whole Foods Market?  Virgin Olive Oil?  You take me for some snot-nosed yuppie, which I can assure you I am not.
      You argue that diverting funds from roads to public transport is mindlessly stupid.  That’s because you can’t see past your nose:  the car you drive is the cause of congestion, and every new road and lane that is built actually adds to the congestion (look it up, the research is in).  The only way to decrease congestion is to spend money elsewhere, ie public transport, cycling infrastructure etc.
      Stop living such a selfish lifestyle, start thinking of those around you and you just might become a nicer person (but I doubt it.).
      Re-reading your comment, it seems to me that you’re a very bitter person: you can’t even acknowledge the nobility of my personal sacrifices without turning it into a back-handed compliment.  Enjoy your drive home.

    • Pedro says:

      03:49pm | 21/10/09

      DG (11:44am | 21/10/09) you will never be a politician/public servant.

      The solution to the whole of the worlds problem lies in TAXATION. Tax fast food and solve the obesity problem, tax cars more and that wil solve the congestion problem, tax carbon and that will solve climate change. Tax alcohol and ciggies more and that will solve the hospital crisis.  You dont do the opposite as that may actually work and then where would we be? If they truely encouraged us to use public transport with tax DEDUCTIONS, more people may actually take them up on it. Then they may have to seriously adress public transport which would require them to find something else to tax. Or even worse, THINK!

    • AJ says:

      03:57pm | 21/10/09

      Here’s a thought (oh dear god, it’s an idea instead of criticism!):

      Build free carparking capacity in regional transport hubs and increase the number of express trains/buses from those hubs to the city.

      The idea being, you drive a short(ish) distance to a train station, get on an express train to and from work, when you get home, you get in the car (perhaps that large station wagon someone mentioned earlier), do the shopping and pick up the kids in the car on the way home.

      Any reason this couldn’t work (other than the seeming inability of CityRail to not have trackwork half the bloody time)?

    • Voxpop says:

      04:20pm | 21/10/09

      This proposal comes from an understanding that technology with cars is advancing to the point where electric and fuel efficiancy are going to be the norm which = less tax revenue from fuel (remember tax is evil but we need it to pay for improvements).  so as far as I can see it’s a user pays system (which I support) and other costs will reduce as these are applied. 

      Me, I have 3 registered vehicles - I have to pay Rego and CTP on each but can only drive 1 at a time and have always felt that CTP should be applied to the individual driver rather than each vehicle - this is an insurance rort and as such off topic but an example of applying user pays in a fair manner.

    • Carolina says:

      03:39pm | 26/04/11

      Because of the widespread use of digital technology, generating fake pictures has never been easier. Making fake photos of celebrities to impress your friends or doctoring media photos to alter public opinion is just as easy. Because image manipulation happens at the pixel level, detection is not as easy as it was before the digital era. Tricky fakes can be exposed by algorithms that detect discrepancies or statistical irregularities at the bit level. Photoshopped Image Killer is such a good example of this kind. It’s free.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter