With the MasterChef juggernaut about to serve up its latest side dish in the form of Junior MasterChef, the kitchen timer is already trilling with the first claim of exploitation of its young contestants.

Some of the culinary kiddies from last night's show.

Last night the nation’s most lucrative TV brand shortened the apron strings and lowered the bench heights as a bunch of eight to 12-year-olds battled it out to become the most precocious kid …. oops, I mean, the most talented tween chef in Australia.

But not everyone is happy about combining kids with reality TV and it’s not because they’ll be staying up past their bedtimes.

“All but one [of these kids] will ultimately fail,” says Dr Guy Redden, of the department of gender and cultural studies at the University of Sydney.

“Adults living in a capitalist society are familiar with high-stakes, winner-takes-all competition and are better placed to deal it,” he says. “I’d question whether most adults would feel comfortable watching kids on such an emotional roller-coaster.”

He’s right. Parents will be petrified, or at least bemused, because seeing a child fail these days is as rare as chancing upon a truffle growing in your back yard.

In our age of pass the parcel prizes for everyone and medals dished out simply for participation, there’s no distinction between winners and losers. So concerned are we with little Genevieve’s self esteem that we champion even the most minimal of effort. “Oh darling, I’m so proud of you,” we squeal when they draw something they claim to be a person. “Oh sweetheart, you were so close,” we console when they kick a ball five metres to the left of the goal.

The sight then of a 10-year-old being dismissed from the MasterChef kitchen after failing to temper chocolate is something akin to seal clubbing. Whether or not these kids have to hold it together until they get into the chauffeured car or can run sobbing to their parents remains to be seen but either way it’s going to be tough.

And that’s the point. Life is tough and there’s nothing like a bit of failure to build resilience.

In her address to Harvard graduates author JK Rowling pointed out that without her personal shortcomings she might never have become a squillionaire and we would never have known the joy of Harry Potter.

While acknowledging that their presence at the ceremony suggested they were not well-acquainted with failure, she implored the Harvard elite to embrace failure, perhaps even seek it out.
Citing a divorce, poverty and joblessness as evidence of her own failure, she explained how hitting rock bottom allowed her to rebuild her life on a solid foundation.

“Failure meant a stripping away of the inessential. I stopped pretending to myself that I was anything other than what I was, and began to direct all my energy into finishing the only work that mattered to me. Had I really succeeded at anything else, I might never have found the determination to succeed in the one arena I believed I truly belonged.”

Yet in our modern quest to discover our children’s talents virtually before they have shed their nappies, there is no room for failure. We praise them in anything and everything they do so they are unable to distinguish not only what they are genuinely good at but what makes them truly happy.

For a couple of years I drove (in both senses of the word) my daughter to swimming lessons after her coach told me she had potential. Even I could see she had the right body shape, the killer instinct, the chemistry between muscle and water. Eventually, aged nine, she articulated what I had failed to see: “Just because I’m good at it Mum doesn’t mean that it isn’t really really boring.”

A few years back you were barely out of the labour ward before some child expert was telling you that the key to successful parenting was plenty of praise and ignore the bad behaviour. Now we’re encouraged to get our kids to evaluate their own achievements and failures, to appraise not just for effort but for enjoyment. Instead of telling them they were a fabulous angel in the pre-school nativity play, you might ask them what it was like to be on stage. How did the costume feel? Is it something they’d like to do again?

Recently, rather than cheering every time my daughter scored a hoop in basketball I asked her what it felt like: “I love that moment when I don’t know if it’s going to go in or out,” she told me. “Then when it plops through I feel like a super hero.”

Kids could get quite comfortable with failure – perhaps even learn from it – if only we let them.  At Eton College in England, the country’s most esteemed boys’ school and the alma mater of no less than 19 British Prime Ministers, there is no prompt sitting in the wings as the boys perform their annual school play. If they forget their lines … well, they forget their lines. Apparently it rarely happens.

So back at MasterChef central I hope there will be crying over spilt milk and sobs over sunken souffles. Even better if there is a tantrum or two. Surely it’s time someone dropped a plate on the way to the judges table.

No matter, the lovely George Calombaris will be there with his usual homecooked homilies. “Let me tell you something,” he tells the assorted tweens during one challenge. “To become a great chef or do anything in life, you just have to try your hardest. That’s all.”

Try telling that to the kid blubbing in the back of the car because he lost.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Get The Punch on Facebook

95 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • deb says:

      07:44am | 13/09/10

      children are under so much pressure these days to be pefect little brats and take on social responabilities that should not even enter their woolly little heads.they should be allowed to be kids not spouting politics and trying to save the whale.thats our job!cooking should be burning the toast on the weekends and slopping the cornflakes all over the kitchen floor while mum has a sleep in.about time parents took back the role of being mum and dad not the people who go to work to pay for little jimmys new computor/ipod.time for the adults to grow up and put the burden back on our shoulders.

    • HappyCynic says:

      10:11am | 13/09/10

      Bullsh*t.  Kids have passion too and opinions, even if they are misinformed opinions… as a kid I loved to help cook, and by the age of 10 I was allowed to, on occasion, run the kitchen.  I also loved to engage in debates, be politically active (I was too naive to realise it’s all corrupt) and have debate the pros and cons of nuclear energy or environmental activism or whatever.  Mind you I was actually a smart kid and privately educated, encouraged to discover the answers for myself, both by my parents and by teachers, encouraged to succeed and learn from failure.

      The only reason why you think kids, whether they’re yours or others, have “woolly little heads” is because you refuse to teach them otherwise and actively discourage them from learning or satiating their curiosity under the pretence that “kids should be kids”.  That’s the only crime Australian parents are guilty of however it’s the most heinous one of all.

    • Anne71 says:

      12:56pm | 13/09/10

      HappyCynic, couldn’t have put it better myself. Like you, I was helping in the kitchen from a very young age and enjoyed cooking. My family also discussed current affairs and politics around the dinner table, and everybody had an opinion. Kids are only as stupid as you allow them to be. And we were definitely NOT allowed to be stupid!

    • AFR says:

      01:08pm | 13/09/10

      I hope you guys can see there is a TEENY bit of difference between “helping in the kitchen”, and cooking in front of a couple of million TV viewers, and the media attention?

    • becca772 says:

      07:12pm | 21/09/10

      so do the kids actually win anything if they come 1st?

    • Jolanda says:

      07:48am | 13/09/10

      At the end of the day these children applied to be on the show.  They would have watched Masterchef and they know how it works.  So what if they get upset and they cry if they loose, that is normal even adults do it.  Do we want children to have no emotion and no feelings or to feel bad if they show how they feel?.  Maybe some people don’t realize it but playing the game is part of the fun if it wasn’t there would be no competition, these children know that there can only be one winner and they know that the chances are slim that it is going to be them but they still try their luck and give it their best go.  I think good luck to them.  I enjoy the show.

      Education – Keeping them Honest
      http://jolandachallita.typepad.com/

    • KH says:

      08:09am | 13/09/10

      Good.  A bit of failure doesn’t hurt you - it makes you a better person.  Look at the result of this ‘everyone gets a medal’ approach - GenY (maybe not all of them, but the majority) is possibly the most self-absorbed, vain, demanding yet oblivious to everyone else generation ever produced.  From time to time, we stupidly hire them at my work, only to see them leave 6 months later because they haven’t been promoted fast enough.  Get over yourself.  Just because you show up, doesn’t mean you get a promotion, or a medal, or ‘win’.  These kids have been brought up to believe the world owes them a metaphorical medal just for showing up.  Well it doesn’t. 

      I don’t see anything wrong with children learning that not everyone gets a medal.  There is nothing wrong with finding out you aren’t great at something - it means you keep looking for your strengths, instead of wasting time pursuing a dream that your weakness will never let you reach.  Theres nothing wrong with finding out you have to work for something - it won’t just be given to you.  Telling a child they are brilliant at everything is cruel.  You just give them an excuse to blame others for them not getting what they want, and let them keep wasting time pursuing it and possibly never finding out what their real strengths are.  Oh sure, its the ‘judges’ - they just don’t see how talented you are.  Thats way more pathetic to watch than junior masterchef.

      I watched the show - yes, there are some annoyingly precocious kids, particularly the one who referred to herself in the third person.  But the judges were gentle.  They found good points in the dishes, and gave encouragement where it was required.  Particularly when a disaster occurred like melted ramekins or putting the oven on grill instead of cook.  I liked it.  I didn’t see anyone getting put down or belittled.  Children aren’t that precious unless the parents have ‘protected’ them from life.  They will get over it, and they will learn from it.  And the lesson isn’t a bad one.

    • Markus says:

      09:28am | 13/09/10

      Soon as I started reading this one I knew someone would use it to take a stab at those younger than them.

      “These kids have been brought up to believe the world owes them a metaphorical medal just for showing up.”
      No, they’ve been brought up to (correctly) believe that loyalty gets you nowhere nowadays, so they should always look out for their own best interests first.
      Why act shocked when they leave after 6 months for a higher paying job?

      “GenY (maybe not all of them, but the majority) is possibly the most self-absorbed, vain, demanding yet oblivious to everyone else generation ever produced”
      Funny, I’m sure everyone was saying the exact same thing about the Baby Boomers throughout the 60s and 70s, and then Gen X through the 80s and 90s.

    • KH says:

      11:09am | 13/09/10

      mmm no Markus - this is an example of the kind of thing the article is referring to - this idea that you should tell your kid how great they are at everything, all the time.  It has a longer term effect.  My work example is just one - in the last year we have spent time, effort and money on hiring - and 5 of them (all under 30) have left after 6 months - 3 of them admitting it was because they hadn’t been promoted.  I was a little taken aback - I mean they were up against people who had a lot more experience.  They just didn’t seem very prepared to put in the work - they just expected things, and didn’t take it very well when it didn’t happen the way they thought it should.  Their older counterparts do seem to take these things in their stride much better, and are willing to put in the time required.  We got a couple of good ones who will probably do much better in the long run, but that was by accident - you just can’t tell from a couple of interviews.  As I said, its not all of them, but enough to be noticeable.  I presume I am allowed to comment on my own experience.

    • swinger says:

      03:18pm | 13/09/10

      Well KH, that’s how to be successful in the brutal dog-eat-dog world of capitalism that these Gen Y kids have been brought into. So tell me, how long would your company hesitate before sacking workers when the next downturn hits? It works both ways you know, and if these kids are taking advantage of a tight labour market to get better opportunities, good for them.

      As for MasterChef, my main concern is not for the Kids involved but for the ongoing transformation of food into just another yuppie “lifestyle accessory”, all style, no substance.

      Now we have another meaningless triviality for people to obsess about in a desperate need to present an sophisticated image. No doubt it will soon fade away as all the other fads before it, but in the meantime we’ll have crazed masterchef-inspired parents pressuring their little kids to perfectly flambe their asparagus…or you’ll going to bed without dinner.

    • KH says:

      03:43pm | 13/09/10

      Swinger - i had my third redundancy a couple of years back.  I don’t live in fantasy land - these people aren’t my family, they are a business and will do what they are going to do.  However, when there are other people with more experience and understanding around you, maybe you need to accept they will get the promotion, not you.  And even in this ‘dog eat dog’ world, a CV full of six month stints when you arent a contractor is not a good look.

    • Kim Croft says:

      08:48am | 13/11/10

      After reading Angela Mollards “unique take on life” in the Sunday Magazine I was interested in reading some more of her articles.  I just happened to chance upon this discussion group and read KH’s comments.  Well done!!! I couldn’t have said it better or agreed more. 

      As a person who works with young children I am now starting to become acutely aware of how this “praise all” attitude is starting to affect the resilience of our younger generations.  I know of schools that give an award to every student at the “recognition” ceremony held at the end of each year.  Is this really necessary?  And I’m sure you’re right in the sense that we have produced this generation of over indulged, unappreciative and essentially materialistic young people who feel it is their “right” to be given applause just for turning up to work. 

      As the mother of four very young children, I am now recognising the errors of my ways with my eldest daughter (8 yrs).  I, (not my husband who has more sense than me) wanted my daughter to experience so much.  We have done the swimming lessons, the ballet lessons, Little Athletics and netball.  But it took me a good seven years to realise that it probably wasn’t about my daughter so much as it was about me and my wanting her to be the best that she could be.  It has been a hard lesson for me to learn as I finally realised that all kids really need is the essential knowledge that you love them and you will be there for them when it really counts.

      I will make one interesting observation though.  I feel this issue is very much “geographic” in the sense that many underdeveloped nations have not experienced this epidemic of behaviour.  When traveling in Thailand and Indonesia I am heartened by the beauty of the people.  In the areas in which I have travelled, I have seen human kind in its purest form.  These people virtually have nothing compared to our standards of living, yet they are happy and their little ones seem very well adjusted to life.  They appreciate everything given to them and realise that family is the most important thing in life.  Not what type of car you drive or how much you are being paid.  If only we could turn back the clock 30 - 40 years and get back to the “simple things” in life. Food for thought!

    • Tom says:

      09:10am | 13/09/10

      Child Abuse! Yeah right the children applied to be on the show—its their overpowering obsessive parents ... again! Exactly like those child pageants.
      Besides, when the eventual child wins, what then, it becomes the next Chef at Tetsuyas? Let children be children!

    • Jen says:

      10:34am | 13/09/10

      You make it sound like shamelssly exploiting children for the sake of entertainment is a bad thing… what else are we going to watch on a Sunday night?

    • Steve says:

      09:13am | 13/09/10

      Why don’t they have a competition like this for underprivilidged kids who could really use a bit of help, instead of a bunch of kids from well off families who have put them through some kind of intensive chef training with professionals just prior to going on the show…

    • BobM says:

      11:24am | 13/09/10

      Because it would be pretty boring watching them all looking for the Happy Meal in the pantry….

    • Anne71 says:

      01:04pm | 13/09/10

      @BobM - wow, aren’t you the comedian? What an offensive generalisation. Do I really need to tell you that not every disadvantaged family subsists on fast food? That some of them manage to cook nutritious meals for their kids? And let me just add that when I go past McDonalds, Krispy Kreme, etc, I see quite a lot of kids from the more exclusive private schools queuing in there too. It’s not the sole preserve of the “disadvantaged”. Get over yourself, do.

    • Eric says:

      03:04pm | 13/09/10

      Hey Bob - laughed at your comment.  Boy, don’t we have some uptight and serious people around (eh Anne71)?

    • Rossco says:

      09:29am | 13/09/10

      Turned it off after 2 minutes. Absolute rubbish. It was bad enough with try hard adults vying to get into the celebrity world. They will never be real chefs even at the “master level”.

    • trish says:

      10:32pm | 25/10/10

      that is complete rubbish! “They will never be real chefs”? What a insulting remark! Just because they can cook & choose to help around the kitchen, rather than playing with dolls & toy trucks?

      Ok, so they’re still very young, but I think the show is a great opportunity for those kids to really help build up their skills & confidence in their cooking. They obviously love cooking, and probably would want to pursue a career as a chef once they grow older…and I think the show is a great stepping stone for them.

      I don’t know you, but I won’t be surprised if some of those kids on the show can cook a zillion times better than you do!

    • Mayday says:

      09:51am | 13/09/10

      Sponsorship, Marketing, Ratings, Consumerism and Reality TV is not suitable for children under the age of ten, developmentally they are not ready for the adult concepts the show revolves around.

      I work in Early Childhood and constantly see the negative effects television has on children’s thinking, imagination and ability to reason fact from fiction.

      Parents who place children in these sorts of positions need to critically think about their own personal motives and just what benefits the child is getting from attempting to mimic their own unfilled desires.

    • Adam Diver says:

      03:17pm | 13/09/10

      I am sure the kids are being fed consumerism by cooking on a television show. I am also sure that the kids take place in the TV execs meetings with the producers as they discuss sponsorships and ratings.

      But beyond that how dare the parents give thier children an opportunity of a lifetime (to be on TV) on a show that promotes cooking (i.e healthy living despite some of the ingredients) to a generation, the first to not outlive thier parents because of an obesity epidemic.

      They should cancel it so little jonny can tell fact from fiction, and imagine himself being skinny, whilst his early childhood teacher re-inforces how good he is, and how bad consumerism, reality tv and ratings are.

    • Mayday says:

      06:45pm | 13/09/10

      Adam the show is there to generate ratings, create a profit for the companies involved and fill a need for family entertainment on TV.

      Its the age of the children involved and their ability to cope that is in question.
      It is one thing to watch the show with mum and dad at home but competing in a commercial offshoot of an adult tv reality show!
      As far as an opportunity of a life time, yes Coles et al must be loving it!

    • Sarah says:

      09:53am | 13/09/10

      “Everyone wins a prize” in pass the parcel?
      WTF?
      Only one person wins a prize - the final layer. What is this all about?

    • Tess says:

      10:25am | 13/09/10

      Sounds like you haven’t been to a kids’ party lately (lucky you).  These days there’s a prize in every layer of paper.  The adult running the event and stopping the music is expected to keep track of who hasn’t had a turn yet and utterly rig the results so that by the end everyone wins.  And hopefully the number of participants matches the number of layers so that nobody wins more often than anyone else.

      It’s more expensive and more hassle for the party organiser, and it sends extremely misleading and deceptive messages to the kids about how life really works.  Worst idea ever.  Bring back the tough love version.

    • NEFFA says:

      10:42am | 13/09/10

      pass the parcel has changed alot over the years. these days theres a prize on every layer (no-one can miss out)

    • Nicola says:

      11:38am | 13/09/10

      @Tess, “It’s more expensive and more hassle for the party organiser, and it sends extremely misleading and deceptive messages to the kids about how life really works.  Worst idea ever.  Bring back the tough love version.”
      Hilarious.  It’s a party, not a life-skills building course!  And if you find wrapping up a few little gifts in newspaper for your 3 year old’s b-day party all too expensive and a “hassle”, maybe it’s you who needs the tough love, not the kids.  Sheesh.

    • bella starkey says:

      12:31pm | 13/09/10

      Of course there’s a prize on every layer but the GOOD prize is in the last layer.

    • Cooko says:

      01:13pm | 13/09/10

      Umm - We used to have little treats in every layer when I was a kid - just little penny chews or somthing, nothing life changing. I’m 36 and grew up the gritty, no nonsense North of England. Now, call me a hand wringing, yoghurt knitting, lefty, pinko, do-gooder, but i thought pass the parcel at kids parties was supposed to be fun.

      As for junior masterchef - a) it’s nothing new; these precocious little twerps were cooking up a storm in the early 90’s in the UK version; and b) have you heard the way they talk? “I’m not ready for my “journey” to end today” uttered one 11 year old.. how many 11 year olds do you know who are on a “journey”? Go and climb a tree or something….

    • Rob says:

      01:31pm | 13/09/10

      I rana party on the weekend and did exactly that -  a lollipop in each layer and final big present at the end. No biggie. What shocked me was the tears and howlings when each kid got eliminated in musical chairs….no prizes for each in that one! My mistake I guess!!

    • Sheedy's Left Foot says:

      09:57am | 13/09/10

      Guess I must be the anti-modern parent.  If my kids fail, they fail. It happens. They know they cannot win all of the time or be the best at everything. It is called reality. However the know that I expect them to try to be the best they can be at anything they do and learn from any mistakes they make.

      Just a shame the education system doesn’t always support it with nonsense such as non-competitive sports day or prizes for all regardless of whether you have deone anything to warrant a prize.

      That’s why I dont have an issue with Jnr Masterchef, it is no different to kids being enrolled at ballet, or soccer or auskick, or the chess club ot maths tuition or drama lessons. It is about parents wanting their kids to do well and fostering their interests. As long as when they fail they are allowed to fail and learn, then we dont and shouldn’t have a problem.

    • Eric says:

      03:16pm | 13/09/10

      Absolutely agree with your views.  I have 2 very well adjusted kids (a PhD for one and a law/ finance degree for the other).  They learned by making mistakes and knowing their strengths and limitations.  We provided support for them when needed but they were encouraged to have a go.  As for Masterchef last night - thought it was very well handled by the judges.

    • Mervak says:

      12:12am | 14/09/10

      @Sheedy’s Left Foot.
      The ‘education system’ encourages children to try their best, which is something that you yourself expect from your own kids. Rewarding kids for this attitude is great in my opinion. I’d much rather my kids go through an education system that encourages this, rather than the system I went through that encouraged the talented kids, and left the rest to sit back and watch. And, in regard to non-competitive sports days, they encourage a healthy lifestyle, and show kids that being active is not necessarily boring. I fail to see how this is a bad thing.

      I agree with you comments on the show. I watched junior masterchef and I don’t think it’s a bad thing. These kids are being encouraged and the judges are supporting them. The kids that are in it are 50 from 5,500, that in itself is a great achivement and one that I’m sure they’re proud of.

    • AdamC says:

      10:06am | 13/09/10

      I don’t object to the idea of high-stakes competition, but am not so sure about the voyeuristic, ‘reality TV’ melodrama tacked onto it.

      There is something fundamentally unhealthy and misleading about not challenging kids to succeed or fail. JK Rowling’s comments are terrific: educators and parents need to stop being afraid of their children’s failure. Fear of failure must be one of the most toxically debilitating characteristics to have.

      PS, KH, is there some Godwin’s law equivalent when it comes to Gen Y? Seriously, it’s time to move on. First-wave Gen Yers are pushing thirty; soon there’ll be a whole new set of youngsters for you to get stereotypically curmudgeonly about.

    • KH says:

      01:08pm | 13/09/10

      Again - I have said, numerous times (but apparently you don’t read the whole comment), it isn’t all of them that are vain and selfish - but enough to be noticeable.  There are some decent people out there in their 20s - probably ones that are way more well adjusted than I was at that age - I just haven’t met them. Doesn’t change the fact that the ones I have contact with seem to come almost exclusively from the bad pile.

    • Damo says:

      02:40pm | 13/09/10

      KH you can see what you’re saying, right. It’s kind of like this: “I’m not a racist but most of the [insert race here] I’ve met are lazy/alcoholics/bad drivers etc etc”.

    • AdamC says:

      03:03pm | 13/09/10

      KH, what Damo said.

    • Von says:

      06:20pm | 13/09/10

      KH, is it really the Gen Y generation, or is it more age that is the issue?
      I’m GenY (late 20s) and I’ve been at my job for 5 years. I wasn’t promoted in the first 6 months. I only got my first (inflation) raise maybe 1.25 years after I started. I didn’t even get an inflation raise the first year! This was starting at grad rates too.

    • Jim ng says:

      10:08am | 13/09/10

      This is nothing compared to what Chinese parents put their kids through to get to selective schools. If you call this child abuse…

    • jim says:

      10:13am | 13/09/10

      let kids be kids, just doesnt seem right - they will have plenty of time to gain cooking skills as they get older

    • Sam says:

      10:29am | 13/09/10

      I’m sure before these kids were chosen to go on the show they were put through a battery of evaluations to see if they had the emotional maturity to handle it. There was a ton more crying in the adult show after the first round then in the Jnrs.

      I think it is patronising to children to say things like they should only be cooking “burnt toast and soggy conflakes”. These kids have a passion and its much better to see them doing something with it then playing mindless video games like 99% of kids out there. I didn’t see any parents interfering with or pushing their kids. All I saw was parents hugging their kids and telling them they were proud whether they won or lost.

      I see nothing wrong with this show. For those who think it is an “abuse of childhood” you should go talk to the children sold into prostitution or to your nearest hospital with the latest child beaten within an inch of its life. Allowing your child to go on a show that they are perfectly capable of handling does not rate very high in the abuse stakes to me.

    • Scott says:

      10:39am | 13/09/10

      I can’t believe the amount of people that have a problem with the fact that only one child will win??? Isn’t that the same as a school race on the athletics track?  what’s next, ban school sports because there is only one winner.  To Angela Mollard, the author of this piece of literary excriment, if you can compare one of the kids not progressing to “seal clubbing”, I suggest get off your backside and change the channel.  These kids were amazing.

    • Sheedy's Left Foot says:

      11:08am | 13/09/10

      Scott, many schools already do ban competitive sports day.

      My son did his races a week before his classmates as he could not attend sportsday due to a family matter. He was given a prize and certificate for taking part. Same as all the other kids who would do the same the following week.

      He learned nothing from this experience.

    • Miranda says:

      11:54am | 13/09/10

      @Sheedy’s Left Foot, I found your comment very interesting - I’d like to ask how athletic your son is, generally? Is he the type of kid that wins races? I only ask because I recall plenty of primary school competitive sports days and “phys ed” time - and hating it all with a passion because I was terrible at sports. I loved reading and writing and ended up being Dux of my year, but this didn’t make up at all for being forced to huff and puff my way around the oval as the more athletic kids overlapped me time and time again. Or standing as far out in the outfield as I could during games of softball/T-ball/cricket in the hope that nobody would hit the ball to me, because I couldn’t throw it very far (and of course they did, and it took me ages to get it, while the rest of my team’s yelling obscenities at me, we lose and the most athletic kid tells me it’s all my fault).

      I could think of nothing worse than having to compete in the sports day in front of everyone and prove to an audience that I was an unfit nerd. I was fully used to failing in this area. I had no doubts about that. But at the very least, in my early years,  “everyone gets a certificate” (this would have been about 1993, hardly a new thing), made me feel better for trying my best. The kids that came 1st, 2nd, 3rd won still got the shiny ribbons and the cheers.

      I’m now 26, tertiary educated and work full time (having been in the workforce for 5 years, I have been promoted once and changed my job after four years, simply for a change of scenery). I always worked my hardest at school and at sports, admittedly doing much less of the latter than the former, and was fully prepared to accept my failings with successes. I’ll admit that I’m still competitive but more at academics than at sports, because I always knew with sports I had absolutely no chance at being the best, and that was okay with me.

      Is there really such a problem with “everyone gets a medal” if it at least means the unfit kids aren’t getting slammed, in our Australian sports-crazy society?

      (And no, I wasn’t overweight, my mother rarely bought junk food and we didn’t have video games. I just inherited her love for sitting on my butt with a book rather than running after a ball…and the uncoordination that has dogged her side of the family for years!)

    • bella starkey says:

      12:48pm | 13/09/10

      Oh Athletics carnivals, how they damaged my psyche.

      My major problem with them was that while swimming carnivals had optional participation, at the athletics carnivals, at least one race was manditory.

      Now as a child i was quite a good swimmer and would usually win a race or two (untill high school when some of my classmates were going to junior pan-pac games etc) but i couldnt run to save my life. Literally, faced with a texas chainsaw style massacrer, i would deffinately be picked off first.

      Absolutely scarred by it all.

    • Anne71 says:

      12:52pm | 13/09/10

      @Miranda - you don’t see anything wrong with giving someone a reward or prize which they did not earn? Let’s put this another way - how would you have liked to have seen another student made Dux, a student who did not put any effort into their studies but only got there because someone thought it would be bad for their self-esteem if they didn’t get it? Raising kids to believe that there are no losers and that everybody wins is, quite simply, cruel. Because when they get out into the real world they will find out very quickly that there is only one winner when it comes to that fantastic job they want, or that house they want to rent or buy.  What on earth is wrong with letting kids grow up with the knowledge that you win some, you lose some?  They need to learn that losing isn’t the end of the world, just as they need to learn that winning isn’t everything. Stop wrapping them in cotton wool and let them experience life’s ups and downs. They’ll be better people for it in the long run.

    • Steve Smith says:

      12:59pm | 13/09/10

      Miranda, why is competing academically any different to competing athletically?

      In the HSC/Tertiary Studies, we are graded by our success. Should we all just receive pass marks so the academic failures feel better?

    • KH says:

      01:16pm | 13/09/10

      Funny you should bring up that subject, Steve Smith!! My first degree was back in the 80s - one of my classmates failed a subject, and had to front an academic review committee to explain why they should continue in the course.  Fast forward to the early 2000s - I did a third degree - it was hilarious.  Just about everyone ‘passed’.  Some of the questions on noticeboards (a lot more online stuff this time around) made it clear at least half the class didn’t understand assignment questions, couldn’t write english properly, and didn’t understand basic concepts.  One group assignment I refused to do after the 2 of the group didn’t do anything, and the other one gave me this drivel that he had clearly copied off the internet.  How they ever passed an exam remains a mystery to me.  Yet somehow, they magically kept going up year after year, and graduating!!  And people wonder why I am cynical…...

    • Scott says:

      02:01pm | 13/09/10

      @ Miranda. Boo Hoo
      @ Miranda71.  I agree with you 100%.  Thanks

    • Markus says:

      02:08pm | 13/09/10

      Sadly KH, it seems you have been welcomed to the wonder of privatised tertiary education.
      It is not so much a result of the ‘everybody wins’ mentality, just that there is very little financial viability in grading students so hard that they are forced to/choose to stop attending (and paying money).

      This was especially the case for international students paying full fees up front.
      On the plus side, I used to make good money proofreading essays of international students that could barely speak English. It beat working at Maccas, at least.

    • Miranda says:

      02:29pm | 13/09/10

      @Anne71 - I’d hardly view a certificate of participation for sports as an “equal prize” with winners or as wrapping kids up in cotton wool. As I mentioned, the kids that won at sports days got the ribbons and the prestige and were the ones who were also successful at it during the year. I didn’t view myself as anywhere near their level and certainly didn’t see myself as a “winner”, or that it was any sugar-coated metaphor for life, etc. It simply made me think “well I’m not very good at this, but at least I tried, and someone noticed this.” Which is the attitude my parents also raised me to have. Regarding your comments about a student being made Dux who didn’t try at all….well, there’s just no way that would happen. I had to work incredibly hard to achieve that, just as kids who are good at sport worked hard at that too.

      (Yep, *gasp* I even remember kids’ parties of pass the parcel where there was a lolly in each layer. If you got one, great - it still wasn’t as good as the end prize, and the music didn’t stop for every person. If you didn’t, you’d forgotten about the whole thing 10 mins later and were still stuffed full of sugar by the end of the day)

      @Steve Smith (and which Anne71 was also saying), well obviously not, I would never condone that. But I think there’s a huge gap between being literate and having basic reading/writing skills, which is fairly necessary and also an important skill for parents to pass on to their children, and for being “good at sports”, which I personally don’t view as being “essential” to a well-rounded life. Being fit and healthy, yes, without a doubt, but I think there’s a huge difference between the unfit kids not having to feel like crap on a mandatory sports day (NOT so they can feel like “winners” just so that it’s acknowledged that they tried their best. Ask anyone like Bella Starkey below, who hated sports days. They’ll tell you no amount of prizes could have ever made them enjoy doing it), and for literary tests/standards to be “dumbed down” so that everyone passes. I don’t see the former having long-term damage (it didn’t for me), but the latter quite obviously does.

      Obviously my view is tainted by the fact that I loved school work and hated sports. But I’m really enjoying this debate and realise everyone has different views.

    • nicola says:

      04:34pm | 13/09/10

      Steve Smith -  believe it or not, but education is not actually a competition between students.  Shock horror.  It’s actually about getting, well, an education.

    • Anne71 says:

      07:37pm | 13/09/10

      Miranda, you’ve missed my point entirely. I have no doubt that you worked very hard to be made Dux. I just wanted to draw a parallel between a child being given a prize for sporting achievement that they did not earn and a child being made Dux without earning it academically. Neither is fair to the children who really put the hard work in, regardless of whether it’s sports or study. And one more thing:  I hated sports days with a passion, but accepted them as a necessary evil. I was never upset that I didn’t win anything, because I knew very well that my talents lay in other areas. I certainly would have treated any “prize” that I didn’t actually earn with the contempt it deserved.

    • Steve Smith says:

      08:16pm | 13/09/10

      @nicola: do we not compete for places in University? Do we not compete for that one job vacancy? Shock Horror. Life might be competitive.

    • Miranda says:

      12:00pm | 14/09/10

      @Anne71, no I haven’t missed your point, I think you’ve missed mine. I completely disagree with you that a certificate of participation in sports day is ever/should ever be seen as a “prize” or intended to convey that all competitors have achieved equally (come on, how would any child think that was equivalent to a first-place ribbon?). If a non-athletic child does their best on sports day but fails, I think that should still simply be acknowledged. I understand that we disagree on whether they have “earned” this right and I respect that, but it certainly had no negative long-term effects for me. If a non-academic child works hard but still fails at school work, well I think that should still be acknowledged, but that is a completely different kettle of fish. It then needs to be seriously looked at and methods of improvement suggested, and definitely not given a “pass” mark, because that has major negative long-term effects and not just for the individual. In both sports and academics, the biggest prizes and distinct “winners” should be the ones who have worked the hardest - we seem to agree on that, but you can’t honestly claim that merely “participating” should be judged equally in both areas.

    • Miranda says:

      12:56pm | 14/09/10

      Can I just clarify…my argument was never for an overall “non competitive” sports day. By all means keep your 1st, 2nd, 3rd prize ribbons in and make it clear that those kids are the winners on the day, just as I experienced. I’m just saying there’s nothing wrong with everyone else getting a certificate for trying (no, not a medal, not a “prize”).

      I’ll shut up now raspberry

    • Louise Piazza says:

      11:09am | 13/09/10

      Well, you guys who saw the show are lucky,I didn’t because where we live in Kalgoorlie WA,WIN tv who picks up a lot of Ten’s programs deemed it not a good watch for us Goldfielders who waited with baited breath ,got our dinners over early…I got my visitors out the door by 7pm so i could watch it and what happened? WIN didn’t show it ,just the usual shows for Sunday nights!
      I was devastated but not surprised because we didn’t get the first Masterchef here until 4 weeks before the show ended and I knew the winner via the media before the afternoon shows shown by WIN Nine showed the last episode. NOT impressed .
      By the second Masterchef show,WIN had learnt a lesson and showed it similtaneously with the Eastern Seaboard so why are we not going to get the Junior version here?
      I’ve just phoned WIN in Perth to commplain bitterly about this because heaps of us viewers here were hanging out to see the show!
      Still waiting for return call.

    • Tony of Poorakistan says:

      01:47pm | 13/09/10

      I respectfully disagree. I think you are lucky to have been spared it. I had to go down the other end of the house, closing every door between myself and the television before I could get away from it.

      I dislike the ‘normal’ version of the show and there is no way i would subject myself to a kiddie version designed to suck the last advertising dollar possible out of an already stale concept.

      I’d rather emasculate myself with a blunt spoon than watch crap of that sort.

    • Alicia says:

      02:53pm | 13/09/10

      Tony - at least you HAVE the option to turn it off or walk away. It’s ridiculous that we still don’t have across the board TV channels/broadcasts in 2010! I’m in Alice Springs and the moment and miss channel ten (which we only got a few years ago in Darwin).

      People should have the option in this day and age.

    • Tony of Poorakistan says:

      04:05pm | 13/09/10

      Alicia

      don’t panic. Conroy and Gillard will be personally running fibre down every outback track next week (if not sooner) and you’ll not only be able to stream this talentless piece of drivel, but the Scandinavian, Japanese and Brazilian versions as well.

    • jim says:

      11:19am | 13/09/10

      The kids were great.  They all seemed to know what they were doing and appeared to enjoy the competition. (Steve), you have stated that all the kids are from well off homes and were trained by chefs for the competition. Do you know this for a fact or are you blaming your personal failure in everything on some imaginary advantage that other people have?  You will always find smarter and richer people than you who got there by effort alone.  Accept it and get over it.

    • dw says:

      11:36am | 13/09/10

      Most kids I know are caught up in the moment - and it often involves the desire to run around. Go to a junior sporting match - win or lose, after 20 minutes most kids have moved on and will be mucking around chasing each other with water bottles. The emotions linger a bit longer on the faces of the parents.

      I once coached my daughter’s soccer team. They lost. One vocal parent took his daughter aside after the game to wax lyrical about trying your hardest, being a good sport etc - all of which she personified already. She went over to her giggling team mates after and said ‘Hey guys - we lost!’. And they all started dancing to Pink….

      It may come as a shock, but the only lasting lessons a kid will learn in life will be generated by themselves. The parent will either be telling them something they already know or speaking of things that they are not ready to comprehend.

    • David says:

      12:32pm | 13/09/10

      Watch Junior Master Chef and behold another accelerant to the down-trending spiral of society.

      This isn’t like some weekend sport.

      This is on TV and in the media and is controlled by an entity who expects to turn a profit from the idea (which is natural, but not in this context).

      It’s not abuse, but it’s a massive worry.

    • HappyCynic says:

      02:07pm | 13/09/10

      What downward trend of society?

      Seriously, life’s never been better and the health of society is fine thank you very much.  Worrying about it though doesn’t make it any better.

      If you have a problem with how things are run, might I suggest looking in your own backyard first.  Your perceptions are what influence your view of a society as a whole, if society is going down the drain then reason suggests that you’ll be the first one down there wink

    • Shane L says:

      12:38pm | 13/09/10

      From watching the show last night it appeared to me that to have made it to the top 50 out of the 5000+ strong applicants that these top 50 kids have already won. Not to forget that at the start of the show they were told that they’d each be receiving a prize no matter what.

      Why is it that we as adults are saying they are going to be so damaged? Didn’t “you” ever go after something in your life as a kid simply because you had the drive to do so. Win or lose you’ll still gave it your best and that has shaped “you” into the individual that you are today.

      Be proud of yourself and these kids for stepping outside of their comfort zones and giving it a “red hot go”

    • miketron says:

      12:39pm | 13/09/10

      I reckon the next reality-competition show on the cards should be “So You Think You Can Coal Mine”. Then, inevitably we’ll have the junior version. Whoever comes ou with the blackest lungs wins!

    • Tony Bee says:

      12:40pm | 13/09/10

      Bravo, Angela! All of this positive reinforcement in schools is producing a generation of delusionally arrogant failures.

    • Michael says:

      12:43pm | 13/09/10

      The funniest part of Junior MasterChef is that we can prove someone is lying.  However, unlike most real-life situations, we can pin it down to one of two culprits: either the judges who are spinning bullcrap about how good the meals are, or it’s the entire restaurant industry that is.

      Every damn dish, it seemed, was met with rapturous praise by George et. al., even with pronouncements that they’d be happy to serve up a 10 year old’s dish in one of their own restaurants.

      There’s only two alternatives here.  Either George and his mates are overstating their liking for a small child’s meal, which cuts into the entire concept of the show as an open, honest test of cooking ability ... or we’ve just had it demonstrated conclusively that a 10 year old kid can do whatever a supposed master pastry chef with 20 years’ experience can do for $100 per dish, and probably for half the price and with half the histrionics.  If the latter is correct, this would indicate the entire castles-in-the-air food tasting and restaurant industry is, in essence, bullcrap.

      And no, this wasn’t a case of being gentle with the kids.  It was well over the standard of “pity about the salt, you made a good try, that’s a nice dish.”  Half the things the judges were saying were being said by them to the last four or six *adult* contestants on the show.  You could just about have cut and pasted clips from the final four week of MasterChef into the judge’s reactions for the first episodes of Junior MasterChef.

    • KH says:

      01:49pm | 13/09/10

      I thought that baklava looked pretty damn good!  And they didn’t show all the comments - there were a couple of ‘needs more salt’ and ‘a little overcooked’  - maybe you are in shock because they dwelled on the positive things instead of the negative…........I know, its not normal in todays reality TV universe…......

    • DMR says:

      12:58pm | 13/09/10

      I’m all for kids learning the lessons of failure as preparation for the adult world, I just don’t see why they have to do this under the gaze of the nation.

    • Kel says:

      01:06pm | 13/09/10

      I was blown away at the creativity of these kids, they were amazing! Kids are resilient and doing something like this is a once in a lifetime opportunity, how could that be denied if its something they really wanted to do? Kids face let downs all the time, being picked last for a sports team? Coming last in a race? This is life and we live in a modern society. They will deal with the fallout, there is no point being sheltered from hurt feelings, like kids do they will move on, and they get some scanpan saucepans to take home regardless if they win or not? it seem’s its the adults who need to take a chill pill not the kids.

    • Ella says:

      01:14pm | 13/09/10

      I’m not so much worried about the competition aspect of it, more the fact that it exposes these children to all kinds of nutbags. Hate sites were set up on facebook about some of the adult contestants of masterchef, not because of anything they had done, just because people took a dislike to them. I would like to think that people would be a little gentler on children but given the horrendous responses and death threats to some children who have posted videos on youtube over the last couple of months I think it is unlikely.Not only that but it allows the possibility of someone you don’t know walking up to your child, addressing them by their name and pretending they know them.

    • Happy Life says:

      01:28pm | 13/09/10

      More power to the junior chefs! Kids that don’t make a contribution to family life are doomed to be poor team players at work when they grow up and terrible spouses if they can’t cook .

    • jf says:

      01:46pm | 13/09/10

      I was pretty impressed by the twenty dishes served up by the 8 to 12 year olds last night.

      Made me think, maybe cooking isn’t the mystical, ‘art’ that the celebrity chefs like to make out.

    • Auserix says:

      03:25pm | 13/09/10

      To all you child “experts”. Face it. In every aspect of life there are winners and losers. Nothing will ever change that fact. I thought that the kids in last nights Junior Masterchef were exceptional. I also liked the way the judges conducted themselves, never talking down to any of the contestants and encouraging every one. I think it will be a good show and we will see some amazing performances.

    • Nicola says:

      04:16pm | 13/09/10

      Auserix, come off it, mate.  Think back to your own childhood: there were people who ENCOURAGED you and there were people that DISCOURAGED you.  Which ones do you think helped you the most?  That’s right: the idea is to encourage kids as best you can, not put them off something by declaring them “losers” before they’ve even had a chance to develop.  It’s just common sense.  You don’t need an expert to tell you this, mate.

    • Zeta says:

      04:34pm | 13/09/10

      That’s so strange you illustrated the piece with a JK Rowling quote since any critical reading of her work shows she failed as a writer as well. She must mean she found success in adolescent marketing, her true calling.

    • Paul says:

      04:44pm | 13/09/10

      I’d advise these kidlets to read Kafka’s “The Imperial Message” , a one paragraph piece the central thrust of which is “very often all the diligence, perseverence and hard work in the world is not enough: you will not succeed”.  Helps to put all the other “work hard and realise your dreams” crap in perspective.  the other thing I would advise is to stop watching garbage on TV and go outside.

    • AndyG says:

      05:05pm | 13/09/10

      I actually watched the show last night, unlike Angela Mollard and many posters to this story, and the academic wanker from Sydney whose downbeat take she channelled…

      The show was great,. I remarked to my wife that the enthusiasm and the drive of the young kids was infectious, the mix of bubbly personalities and more subdued kids, the failures and the successes. And a boy whose dessert was a little overcooked got into the pick, as did seven other young people.

      I thought the judges’ performances were exceptional, very supoportive, helpful and positive. A great experience, and a positive one, then spoiled by the whining commentariat and downbeat academic and journalistic stories.

      Life is about the will to try and the will to compete and the desire to win. All present in spades last night, in Rove’s “Are you smarter than a fifth grader.” and many other shows. Let’s support the efforts of the kids and the programs.

      I’ll definitiely watch it again.

    • Paul says:

      08:01pm | 13/09/10

      AndyG’s right!  They were tops!  The judges were fabbo!  The experience was fundamentally life-altering!  The world is safe in the hands of these little wunderkinder!  Hooray for Everything!

    • Yvonne says:

      05:06pm | 13/09/10

      How is Junior Masterchef any different to those kid quiz shows that’s been on tv for years - like ‘It’s Academic’ etc.. there’s winnners and losers - so what?! The only difference is, this time, it’s not about how good you are at maths or spelling, but how good you are at cooking! I think it’s about time that kids - other than the academic and sporty ones - got a chance to shine and be recognised for the skills…...! smile

    • Rayk says:

      05:42pm | 13/09/10

      It’s great to see kids being encouraged, admired and congratulated for something other than sport.

    • Von says:

      05:56pm | 13/09/10

      “The sight then of a 10-year-old being dismissed from the MasterChef kitchen after failing to temper chocolate is something akin to seal clubbing. ” - This line made me laugh!

      Junior Masterchef may be tough and make all the kids bar one upset but in the end, you know that if you win Junior Masterchef, you are bloody brilliant.

    • Ryan says:

      07:08pm | 13/09/10

      Theres a really good article in NY magazine about the problems of excessive praise. Its called The Power (and Peril) of Praising Your Kids. Google it. It has really insightful reasons as to why parents shouldn’t praise excessively. Interesting to note as well that in the end the writer suggests its the parents that are addicted to praising kids (ie they praise to compensate or make themselves feel better) not kids receiving it.

    • Bob H says:

      07:35pm | 13/09/10

      All a bit creepy - milking emotion out of adults is fine but children?

    • George says:

      08:03pm | 13/09/10

      Keep the exploitation going!
      Put pressure on the kids, put them under the spotlight, take away the fun part of being children…..
      How about “Pensioner MasterChef”? or even better “Disable MasterChef”..!!!
      Can you imagine the ratings?????

    • GBS says:

      11:19pm | 13/09/10

      Oh year, its suck a crime having children able to cook good food. Just terrible -_-

    • Katie says:

      07:07am | 14/09/10

      I don’t think these kids when grown up are going to say - I blame Master Chef for all my failings and phsycological hang ups.  No they will say it was the best experience a kid has.  Kids are more resilient than you think, and by the time they do their HSC it will be another one of their life experiences .

    • Mario G. says:

      09:55am | 14/09/10

      “Ultimately all but one of these kids will fail” - claims the expert! Then don’t have gold medals at the Olympics; just hand out “participation awards” to everyone! Sunday’s show was brilliant. The kids were superb and their triumphs and errors were expertly handled by the 3 judges. The fact that there were 4 winners and 6 “losers” in each heat was a perfect balance. It’s only traumatic if you are the only “loser” in a group (e.g. The last one picked for a team). A refreshing wave of positive television!

    • stephen says:

      11:06am | 14/09/10

      Someone once said that cooking has civilized us.
      This is wrong and un-true.
      Cooking has only kept us inside, and children should be out.

    • Barbara Mason says:

      07:37am | 16/11/10

      My phone ran hot last night after the show, one of disbelief considering the 11/10 score received by Jack.
      One sided and makes you believe it was a foregone conclusion and those rated 11 scores were to make the competition appear closer.  It could have been handled better, by selecting 5 unknown judges and the challenge plate by number not by contestant.
      You have contradicted yourself, either Jack’s was the better by your own admission with the scores, or it was not! To have exceeded the chef’s own creation, he should have won hands down.
      A far better choice all round for all, would have been to have had 2 Junior Master Chiefs of Australia, male and female! But now all you have done is isolated many viewers who will see this as being rigged, just like the Japanese Iron Chef that none of us no longer watch either.
      You may be wasting your time setting up for 2011 2nd series, because if my friends and their friends are anything to go by, you have just lost a lot of viewers. One sided, favoritism, and an all round fiasco. I am out, never to be viewed again in this house.

    • TerryErin says:

      07:37am | 12/07/11

      All people deserve very good life time and loans or just student loan would make it much better. Just because people’s freedom relies on money state.

    • Lou says:

      10:19pm | 06/11/11

      Love the show & contestants. The only disappointment is the continual stupid hype the judges insist from the kids. The kids are lovely In their own right the hype takes away from that. stop the screaming!!!!!!!!

    • kimberly gordon says:

      07:34pm | 29/01/12

      if you dont like the show why dare watching it im a kid actually 12 years old and i also love to cook stop shattering my and other kids dreams people!!!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter