Special Edition: First Blood, 1982; Rambo: First Blood Part II, 1985; Rambo III, 1988; Rambo, 2008. Spoiler alert: Rambo has difficulty re-adjusting to civilian life.

Centuries from now visiting aliens will come across humankind’s 2008 film catalogue and think that the most powerful warriors among us were chosen by the length of their ear-hair.

They will have discovered The Age of the Late Sequel – an era of elderly Indiana Joneses, Rocky Balboas and John Rambos – and they will pity earthlings for it.

“No wonder they didn’t see that meteor coming,” they will say.

The late sequel is like the late dinner guest. The early arrivals have eaten the food, absorbed the food and said everything they need to say about the food and everyone is well on the way to getting happily drunk. Then there’s a knock on the door that nobody can be bothered to get up and answer but somebody does out of politeness. Then a whole new couple comes in who’s way more sober than everyone else because they’ve just driven from another party and nobody really knows them that well so they make small talk about the food, which everyone is sick of talking about, and then the host feels morally obliged to offer them some food and they don’t want to be an inconvenience but they also don’t want to be rude and so they end up having some which means the host has to cobble together a plate and in the meantime you were just about to hit on your ex-girlfriend and figured she was just about drunk enough to go for it but the gust of cold air through the front door sobered her up a bit and all this talk about the time made her realise she had to get up in the morning so she goes home and you’re stuck there talking to this stupid @#$%ing couple you’ve only just met about how they’ve just bought a fixer-upper in Petersham and you’re about to glass them when you realise you’ve run out of beer.

This is essentially how people feel about the last Rambo movie – and I use the world “last” optimistically – made no less than 20 years after its predecessor, Rambo III. Already at this point we are entering a sequential nightmare. As purists will know, the original 1982 Rambo movie was in fact called First Blood and it wasn’t until its 1985 sequel Rambo: First Blood Part II that America’s least outspoken Vietnam veteran got naming rights. Then what should have been First Blood Part III became Rambo III. I say this to emphasise the point that 23 years before Sylvester Stallone made Rambo there was already a film called Rambo, a fact Stallone himself might have remembered had he not been sucking down human growth hormones like Skittles.

It is this first Rambo film that is rooted in my memory as the nucleus of the whole franchise. I remember vividly its looming arrival in Australia when I was in grade 4 – the posters, the pencil cases, all adorned with a rippling Stallone thrusting his pelvis into the chamber of a rocket-launcher while his red headband dangled menacingly down the side of his face. As previously noted in these pages, my parents had forbidden me from seeing it and the allure was excruciating. I protested to my mother that Steve Whitta and Nick Munro were allowed to see it but she just gave me a disapproving moralistic look that suggested as soon as my back was turned she would report their parents to DOCS.

As a result I weathered my entire pre-pubesence and teenage years without ever seeing Stallone’s masterwork, and arrived at university with a distinctly unmanly world view. The lack of a strong male role model had left me dreadlocked, drug-addicted and devoted to a reconfigured branch of socialism in which everyone was supposed to work equally except me. This state of mind left me vulnerable to exploitation, costing me several girlfriends and the best part of an Arts degree. At one memorable party a lesbian separatist dragged my drunken love interest back to her house while I dejectedly trundled upstairs to find that the boyfriend of the lesbian separatist (whose sexuality was apparently more fluid than originally thought) had projectile vomited red wine on my walls and passed out in my bed. Upon realising this I muttered something along the lines of “Solidarity my arse” and trundled back downstairs to pass out on the couch. It is unlikely that John Rambo would have dealt with the situation the same way.

As a result of such setbacks it would be another decade before I finally reached my ideological homeland, which can be broadly described as alcoholic misogyny. It was around this time I stumbled across Sly’s familiar figure walking down a lonesome road in the Pacific North West and realised I was watching First Blood. In it the grieving and traumatised John Rambo is persecuted by small-town rednecks until he snaps and starts shooting at everybody only to end up in tears. Immediately I was struck by how sparse and yet emotionally haunting it was, almost unrecognisable from its sequels. Showing rare consistency, it appeared that as with Rocky, Stallone had made an exceptionally powerful and thoughtful film about social isolation, only to quickly rectify the mistake and ensure it never happened again.*

In the Rambo series this journey began with First Blood Part II, in which Rambo is sent back to ‘Nam to recover POWs that the top brass secretly hopes he will never find. The film’s immortal tagline was: “They sent him on a mission and set him up to fail. But they made one mistake. They forgot they were dealing with Rambo.” Ironically, this last statement is not borne out in the film, which shows that the military commanders were highly aware throughout that they were dealing with Rambo.^

Indeed, as the first sentence indicates, they specifically selected him. However notwithstanding such minor inconsistencies, the film remains a magnum opus and sets the tone for the remaining movies far better than its predecessor, although maintains some impressive gravitas. Who can forget Rambo’s last exchange with Colonel Trautman before he walks off into the sunset.

Trautman: How will you live John?
Rambo: Day by day.

You could close your eyes and pretend it was Bogart and Bergman.

Rambo III, an excursion into the Afghan-soviet war, has fewer pretensions to such broad philosophical themes, something hinted at early in the film when Rambo plays a game of polo with a decapitated sheep. Even so, there are strong political messages underlying the film, most notably that the Taliban used to be quite nice people. Sadly this view is no longer as fashionable as it used to be, perhaps explaining Stallone’s desire to make the 2008 film. Of interest is that he still waited seven years after September 11 to release it, suggesting he wanted to give the Taliban every opportunity to come good again.

It is perhaps this constant quest for forgiveness, for acceptance, that is the one overarching driver of John Rambo: He cannot be accepted into society because he is, let us be frank here, a fairly serious war criminal; he therefore needs society to forgive him for this, yet at the same time he must forgive society for rejecting him in the first place. He is the abandoned lover, the motherless child crying in the night. As he says at the end of First Blood:

“I want, what they want, and every other guy who came over here and spilled his guts and gave everything he had, wants! For our country to love us as much as we love it! That’s what I want!”

And surely that is what everybody wants in the end: To love and to be loved in return.

Rating: 4X4 stars

* The obvious exception to this is Rocky IV, in which Stallone answers the critics who thought he couldn’t stoop lower than punching up Mr T.

^ The awareness was no doubt heightened during the film’s closing scenes, in which Rambo machine guns their entire headquarters.

Most commented


Show oldest | newest first

    • Josh says:

      08:17am | 12/08/09

      I don’t care what anybody says, I liked the first rambo and the latest. So its dumb fun, every so often you need it.  But the 2nd and 3rd were terrible

    • ANDIKA says:

      09:37am | 12/08/09

      As always Joe, a highly entertaining review.

      First Blood was a great flick - adapted from the David Morrell novel of the same name. Wish they adpated more of his novels.

    • Michael says:

      10:37am | 12/08/09

      I’m hoping that you’ll review “Rosemary’s Baby” next.

    • Ash Simmonds says:

      11:01am | 12/08/09

      I was about 8 years old and my uncle had First Blood on Betamax, being the young horror fan I looked forward with evil desires to watching a good vampire flick.

      I enjoyed it - however I remember asking quite innocently why nobody used their fangs.

    • Margaret says:

      11:02am | 12/08/09

      Nice review. You’ve stuck with the story line and avoided the actual acting skills brilliantly. I think I see a trend here - how about finding something deep and meaningful in “Space Troopers”? (Better make it #7 though, as you have two #5)

    • Anna says:

      11:07am | 12/08/09

      Sorry Michael, I cannot see it being reviewed. So far and Joe please correct me if I am wrong, the only movies that have been reviewed have had sequels.

      if I were a gambling person I would put my money on Indiana Jones.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      12:15pm | 12/08/09

      Please review “Mean Guns” and “Gunmen”- two of the most awesome films ever….

    • Michael says:

      12:31pm | 12/08/09

      Anna, interesting point.  The sequel to “Rosemary’s Baby” was “Look What’s Happened to Rosemary’s Baby”. 

      So Joe will be free to review it if he thinks it worthy of his critical appraisal.

    • timbo of Sydney says:

      01:20pm | 12/08/09

      Hi Joe,
      Could you please review Fellini’s “Satyricon”?  I’ve seen it a few times but still don’t geddit.

    • stephen says:

      03:02pm | 12/08/09

      Just to change the subject, anything by the Coen brothers will do.
      (I still think ‘Millers Crossing’ an undeclared masterpiece.)

    • Bearbrass says:

      03:18pm | 12/08/09

      Such a poignant end to that review, Joe!  And such evocative memories of social and sexual mores at Melbourne Uni in the early 90s…

    • addy says:

      03:57pm | 12/08/09

      Didn’t Mr. T get beaten up in Rocky III? I think heRocky beats up Ivan Drago and subesequently stops the cold war in Rocky IV…

    • meh says:

      04:54pm | 12/08/09

      outstanding mr h. i love how these film reviews just end up revealing the real hildebrand. like an unpeeling.

      and if we’re voting, my $1 worth would be a similarly outstanding review of a much overlooked superhero - Snake Plissken, in Escape from New York, and the sequel ..wait for it.. wait for it.. Escape from L.A.

      gold i tell you.

    • Coloured Glass says:

      10:55pm | 12/08/09

      I read the book in mid “81, and was shocked when he didn’t die, that was the end of Holly wood for me.

    • Anna says:

      12:48pm | 13/08/09

      Michael, doesn’t “Rosemary’s Baby” fall under horror genre?

      Do you really want Joe to watch a scary movie? Review it and encourage others to view it? Joe has a HUGE following ...

      May be ‘Matrix’ will be reviewed next. IMHO the first Matrix was great, with the last one they lost the plot.

    • Griffin says:

      12:34pm | 14/08/09

      Great review, thanks Joe.  I was thinking of this film just the other day, and here it crops up on your review!  How about some Predator?  That was another sensational action movie!  Cheers!  Griffin

    • Pete says:

      02:30pm | 14/08/09

      I think you should be writing self-indulgent mini-novels about your pathetic ‘coming of age’ instead of reviewing a series of movies you seem to have a limited scope of.. wait, you just have.

      If social interaction at it’s best is to maybe score with your ex-girlfriend when you’re intoxicated to the point of violence, I don’t know why I’m taking my time to retaliate to this travesty of a review. I guess it just means that much to me.

      You condemn Stallone for giving his new movie the same title as the first one, directly after outlining that “First Blood” is the name of the 1982 movie, and by running through the names of the sequels you contradict yourself even more by reiterating that none of the films so far have been titled “Rambo”. You have overlooked the entire point of this new film; closure. Hence the title, “Rambo”. It’s an encapsulation of the entire canon, and the final chapter in the story of a legend coming full-circle.

      The first sequel may not have had the same thoughtful pacing of the first so you may have missed the still present undertones of social isolation, but the more important message here is the anti-war sentiment wrapped up in an explosion-fest that even hung-ho rednecks would enjoy. Your analysis of the tag-line is confused too; Colonel Trautman gave Rambo an opportunity to get out of jail, but Murdoch betrayed Colonel Trautman and Rambo without realising what Rambo was capable of.

      In your libelous suggestion that Stallone is still pro-Taliban today you have ignored that in which has resulted in the obvious change of focus. The Taliban were being persecuted at the time of the third movie, the Karen people of Burma are being persecuted by a dictatorship today.  I know you remember that Rambo resides in south east Asia ever since he walked off the Airfield in Thailand at the end of “First Blood: Part II”.

      You have slandered the new film without even one sentence (or one word) about the plot, mood, acting, soundtrack, context, production etc (bloody good review mate), and only use it as a stepping stone down to memory lane and a lot of ill-informed thoughts about a bunch of movies you actually seem to enjoy.

      I do not get you.

      PS. Perhaps you’d prefer to be a tabloid writer instead? I notice after your ignorant ranting about titles you had a cheap stab at Stallone for HGH.

      PPS. I actually do have a sense of humour, and Independence Day is also one of my favourite movies but I guess that’s all we have in common. See what i did there was information gathering or “research”.

    • Adam says:

      03:59pm | 14/08/09

      Well that’s MY working week ended on a high.

    • Michael says:

      02:59pm | 17/08/09

      Anna: Given that Joe is a self-described alcoholic misogynist, I’m sure that his appraisal of the “love scene” between Mia Farrow and Satan would be of interest to many readers.

    • Glen says:

      08:02pm | 28/08/09

      Joe please please review Inglorious Basterds


Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more



Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter