Have you ever loved anything as a child only to grow and have someone completely ruin it for you?

Did somebody say swarthy type?

Well that’s exactly how I’ve felt when I saw Jake Gyllenhaal as the lead in the new trailers for the ‘Prince of Persia’ movie.  Now I’m happy to admit that I have an unacceptable level of personal attachment to the franchise - it being my favourite computer game growing up and being of Iranian or ‘Persian’ heritage myself. 

Seriously, when did a dose of bad spray tan qualify someone as being Middle Eastern?  And it’s not just the lead role, none of the principal cast members are of Iranian decent. This is despite the fact that Iran has a thriving film industry that is always exporting talented actors and creative types courtesy of its hardline government. 

It really doesn’t matter that the movie ‘Prince of Persia’ is more reflective of science fiction then any actual representation of Iran or Iranians.

As a child I loved the computer games. They weren’t just fun, they gave me an easy way to talk to and relate to others over something that was special to me and my heritage.  As an adult, I feel like the movie has totally wiped out that aspect of it. The movie has reduced my identity, my heritage and my cultural background to lighting and make up.

Why should we care about the casting of the latest Hollywood epic action film? Castings of movies like the ‘Prince of Persia’ are important because we know that media images have profound impacts on our identities.  We’ve seen this link over and over again in the body image debate.  In the words of Mia Freeman from the Government’s action plan on body image:

“It troubles me that so many people, particularly young people, feel unhappy with their bodies. Whether it’s girls comparing themselves with the unrealistic images they see in the media and thinking they’re not tall or skinny enough or boys feeling they need to bulk up or slim down. All too often this translates to feelings of inadequacy and, in some cases, mental illness.”

Just like positive images help young people - particularly young women - feeling more positive about their bodies, young people from ethnic backgrounds need positive and strong role models in the media. In some cases, young ethnic children are even more in need of positive role models to help them with the journey of growing up in two cultures with different expectations.  There are very few positive ethnic role models in Hollywood and even less are from a Middle Eastern background.

The absence of these role models helps to reinforce the idea that being white is better, more beautiful and inherently more virtuous.  After all there’s never been a shortage of ethnic characters to play terrorists and villains in Hollywood action movies.  At worst, casting decisions like the ones made in the movie ‘Memoirs of a Geisha’ whose two leading ladies were from Chinese decent despite the Japanese context of the film whisper that in the end all ‘Asian’s look alike’.  It’s sad and disheartening to realise that even though there was wide outcry in China and Japan over the movie it went with barely a blimp in western audiences who failed to notice the difference.

Young people from ethnic backgrounds do internalise these images no matter how implicit they seem to be.  We can see this in Kenneth Clark’s pioneering ‘doll’ experiment that helped move America away from segregation. 

In the experiment Clark gave black children two dolls one white, the other black.  When he asked which doll was ‘nicer’ the majority of the children said the white one, when asked why, they simply replied ‘because it’s white’.  When asked which one was the ugly one the majority pointed to the black one.  Finally the children were asked which one looked most like them and there is a moment of hesitation and then complete devastation in their eyes when they point to the black doll and accept that their ugly and lesser then the ‘white’ doll. 

The experiment was redone only a few years ago by a seventeen year old filmmaker and the results were almost identical.  You can watch a new version of the experiment here and the high school students version here

The children in the Clark experiment had not yet reached their 13th birthday- but they had already internalised a lack of self worth because of the colour of their skin.

Even more alarming, when these girls grow up with an inherit belief that lighter skin equals being more beautiful then they are more likely to succumb to dangerous skin whitening treatments. Such products promise women whiter and therefore more attractive skin.

Statistics of how many women use skin whiting treatments are incredibly hard to find, however a study published in the International Journal of dermatology had found that in Senegal 36% of women had used skin whiting products at one time, and that 75% of those women had suffered adverse effects as a result of continuous use.

So next time you support a film that actively ‘whitewashes’ its characters, think about it. What exactly are you supporting?

189 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • JJJ says:

      07:10am | 07/06/10

      Seriously? It’s a movie. They aren’t normally celebrated for their accuracy and similarity to real-life. I think you’ll be okay.

    • Larien says:

      09:23am | 07/06/10

      And I think you’re vastly underestimating the impact movies, and the messages they subliminally send have on society at large.
      Casting choices like this send the message that a white actor could play an Iranian part (or Indian, in the case of Gemma Arterton’s princess character) far better than any Iranian actor could hope to do. Does that really make sense?

    • Becky says:

      09:37am | 07/06/10

      Dude, this is a page from Derailing 101, entitled “Belittle and Deflect! Why I Don’t Care About This and You Shouldn’t Either!”. What you see as “just a movie” is one little piece of systemic racism. Media is in important part of how people perceive and relate to each other and, as this very article even pointed out, people internalize the messages they find there in varying ways.

    • Markus says:

      10:43am | 07/06/10

      “Casting choices like this send the message that a white actor could play an Iranian part (or Indian, in the case of Gemma Arterton’s princess character) far better than any Iranian actor could hope to do.”
      No, casting choices like this send the message that a known American actor will draw more box office revenue in an American market than an unknown (outside Iran anyway) Iranian actor.
      The exact same reason that white American actors portray English, Irish, Australia, South African, Zimbabwean, and every other white nationality you can think of.
      And the same reason that Turkey re-creates American sitcoms using Turkish actors to appeal to a Turkish TV market. Is this racism in your eyes too?

    • Banicks says:

      11:55am | 07/06/10

      When Iran has the cash or desire to make a Prince of Persia through it’s own film industry - they may choose whomever as a cast they wish.

      In the meantime, why misplace your discontent towards Jake G or Hollywood. Your frustration does not solve anything - it’s paramount to asking a business to stop making profits.

      Jake G and associated cast was hired by Hollywood to sell tickets. In all honesty, and you know this too, hiring an unknown Iranian cast would not have sold the movie. Maybe it would have to hardcore fans such as yourself - but Hollywood is not in the business of satisfying fans, it is in the business of satisfying its stakeholders.

      I was disappointed at Downey Jr. being Sherlock Holmes - as there are many purely British actors who would have excelled at the role of a British detective. Is it something to publicly write a blog about? No.

      I think your trying to cash in on subtle sensationalism and attempt to get a racial discussion of inequities in Hollywood. Don’t be so petty minded - if you did not enjoy it, move on and never think of it again. Remember what you do enjoy about Prince of Persia.

    • Schartos says:

      12:32pm | 07/06/10

      I have to agree with JJJ. I doubt that the studios should be held accountable to the sensitivities of a small pool of folk who might be offended. It’s a movie that costs a lot of money to make, is supposed to make a lot of money and provide distraction and entertainment. I don’t know anything about Iranian born actors (though I’m sure there are good ones as you say) but I do think that the studios have a better bet financially by casting a proven, popular actor. It’s a fact that movies are more likely to make money and therefore cover the production costs with a popular lead. I’m not sure that the studios should be responsible for the impressions their decisions make on people. People are generally ignorant anyway. Seeing American or English actors play Australian roles is generally well received (though the accent can raise a laugh here and there). Would it have been more authentic if they cast an American actor who looked more the part?

    • suzycreamcheese says:

      12:58pm | 07/06/10

      well said…like I’m going to stay home. I’ll tell you who I’m supporting.  JAKE GYLLENHAAL!

    • Chris L says:

      07:41pm | 07/06/10

      Actually I think Robert Downey Jnr is one American who can play an Englishman. I haven’t seen Sherlock yet (still too scarred by Van Helsing!) but I did see him play an Aussie in Tropic Thunder and was most impressed!

      I didn’t like Keanu Reeves and Winona Rider playing the lead roles in the ‘90’s Dracula (although the movie on a whole was quite good) and I refused to watch Kevin Costner play Robin Hood (same with Russell, though he may be able to pull off the accent). Therefore I think I mostly share Sara’s viewpoint.

    • Rachel says:

      02:20am | 08/06/10

      Yeah, tell that to anyone whose had plastic surgery to look more white, tell that to any woman who bleaches her skin, tell that to any child who hardly, if ever, sees someone from their culture as the hero in a movie and not a background character, a villain, or a sidekick.

      ‘It’s just a movie’ is not an excuse for Hollywood to discriminate against people. Besides, haven’t you ever heard the rule of story telling? ‘Fantasy has to make sense, reality doesn’t’. I personally cannot suspend my disbelief that a Persian prince and an Indian princess can be white with British accents.

    • JJJ says:

      06:56am | 08/06/10

      No you don’t, Chris L…. you just refuse to sit through B-grade hollywood movies where shite actors/actresses have been cast into ill-fitting roles. Sara goes one step beyond this and is actually offended by it (if someone is going to be offended by hollywood, it’s going to be a long, sad life ‘cause hollywood ain’t changing). Instead of writing about it and providing said B-grade movie with free advertising, just don’t support hollywood or their dodgy actors and don’t see it. It’s fairly simple.

    • Tony says:

      09:07am | 08/06/10

      I wonder if the people that are against Sara’s article are of color?  Probably not and its just not ONE movie.  Remember “The King and I”, “Dr. No” , not to mention almost every Western ever made in America.  I know movies are usually not historically accurate, but come on.  You didn’t Denzel Washington playing the lead in “The Passion of Christ” did you? Well why not if ethnic accuracy is not important.  And in my opinion the most blatant disregard for ethnic accuracy in history was David Carradine cast as Chinese in the tv show Kung Fu…a show that was co-created by Bruce Lee, and who was rejected for the role because he was too Asian for America at the time.

    • Red says:

      10:00am | 08/06/10

      @Markus, the problem with ‘casting choices like this send the message that a known American actor will draw more box office revenue in an American market than an unknown (outside Iran anyway) Iranian actor’ doesn’t fly anymore. The movie has done poorly at the box office and from the looks of it, will BARELY even profit once it leaves theaters. Big names don’t means what they used to anymore. And despite the fact that Jake may be a big name, the numbers don’t reflect the profit suggested.

    • Seriously? Passion? says:

      09:43am | 09/06/10

      @ Tony

      Whilst they didn’t cast Denzel in Passion of the Christ, they tried to make that one historically accurate and I still seem to remember the Jews whinging about it anyway, so it seems Hollywood can’t win either way… might as well pick the big name.

    • Bob says:

      07:59pm | 11/06/10

      this chick suffers from inferiority complex. When Iraniwood produces A-list actors and producers/directors/writers i am sure there will be a remake of POP with the skin/eye/hair colour she prefers and in the correct language. Who knows maybe there will be English subtitles aswell to ensure it becomes a box office hit worldwide….

    • Adrian says:

      08:37am | 12/06/10

      Yes Rachael, you are correct, it has “only” made 22 million profit world wide in the first 2 days. What where they thinking!

      Once Iran starts getting the capital to make an international movie that will make the cash, or an Iranian actor becomes a bankable star, then it just will not happen.

      Simply put, Money talks, and from most of the comments here, bullsh*t walks….

      ps, i am of Egyptian heritage and certainly not white.

    • Eric says:

      08:19am | 07/06/10

      You think that’s bad? Imagine my ourage when I learned that most of the actors in The Good, The Bad And The Ugly were Italians!

      At least I can be consoled by the fact that Star Trek uses real Klingons.

    • Chris L says:

      07:43pm | 07/06/10

      Only the ones in the Original Series are real!

    • Dingo_aus says:

      09:46pm | 07/06/10

      Haha, good one.  Seriously the author of this article needs to check her statements against reality.  She is trying to drive a wedge that isn’t there.  A movie using English actors based on a computer game that used English voice actors does not equal a grand conspiracy against you and the people you think you represent.  If you don’t like it, don’t see it.  If you think you can do better, write a script, get funding and do your own casting. Nothing is stopping you.

    • the apologist says:

      08:21am | 07/06/10

      Agreed - first time I saw the trailer I thought it was a joke that some American was playing the prince. Surely it’s not that hard to get it right! Cast someone who can actually convince me!

    • Please says:

      01:19pm | 07/06/10

      Convince you?! Its a movie based on a VIDEO GAME!!! Geez

    • Aliens says:

      08:50am | 07/06/10

      I can’t believe they cast a scrawny white guy to play an aciton superhero. That’s enough to make me lose interest in the movie.

      Similar to the new Predators movie coming out. Another scrawny white guy. Predators are meant to be fought against by gigantic musclemen with massive guns.

      Or chicks with massive guns

    • Markus says:

      09:40am | 07/06/10

      Not even the 80s musclemen Carl Weathers and Jesse ‘The Body’ Ventura stood a chance against the Predator, what in the hell hope does the weiner kid from That 70’s Show have?

    • Markus says:

      08:59am | 07/06/10

      I’m offended that it took one of the most fun game franchises of the last 20 years and made this hunk of crap (why does he speak with an English-esque accent?). That said, you are definitely reading too much into this.
      Hollywood has always had free license on all things cultural. The outcomes are often ridiculous, we all know this (again, see all the actors who think they can do a flawless ‘English’ accent).
      Your emotional attachment to a video game, a 2d platformer of all things, is a little worrying.

      I did find this interesting though “these girls grow up with an inherit belief that lighter skin equals being more beautiful” In an ironic twist that even M Night Shyamalan would be proud of, white Anglo women seem to think that there is nothing more hideous than white skin, doing everything they can to achieve the ‘natural’ tanned look, often with hilarious results(Oompa, Loompa, doopity do!)

    • maybe says:

      12:14pm | 07/06/10

      The prince spoke with a freakin’ “English-esque accent” in the games too.  It’s the standard ‘we want this to be in english eventhough these people would not have so we use a generic as accentless as possible way of sepaking english.  Or heaps bagan accent if you’re Sam Worthington’

    • Rachel says:

      02:43am | 08/06/10

      Your sensitivity and empathy for people not white or male astounds me. Tell me, is that view from White Privilege Mountain nice? Personally I was getting a little tired of seeing the same damn thing over and over so I hiked down to see what it was like LIVING IN REALITY! Turns out it’s a place where people are discriminated against for their culture, skin color, or features and where white is shown in the movies, magazines, tv shows, etc… to be more beautiful, more heroic, and just generally better than everyone else.

    • Rich says:

      09:07am | 07/06/10

      Middle eastern and Europeans are both Caucasoid people and there isn’t really a huge difference between them. I’ve met a heep of Iranians and Turks who all have very fair skin.

      If we’re just going by tone of skin, why aren’t the Spanish and Italians considered Middle Eastern? their hair and skin colour has far more in common with Persian and Arabs than it does with northern Europeans.

      Let’s be honest though, I really don’t think people are going to the movie to see cultural accuracy. When it comes to how much money they’re going to make I think Jake Gyllenhaal killing dudes with scimitars will attract far more people than anything else. Maybe Antonia Banderas would’ve been better.

      Perhaps this will remind people of the rich history of Iran and sway their opinion against decimating it in a soon to be war.

    • Sick and tired of it says:

      11:40am | 07/06/10

      If it were only this one isolated film I would say sure—if the person “looks the part”, go for it!

      But we’re talking about an industry that has no problem finding Middle Eastern and Persian/Iranian people to cast in the “negative” parts, as terrorists and evil-doers. There are more than enough of those parts and more than enough of the people who “look the part” to fill them.

      When it comes time to cast a Hero and a Heroine in a major summer blockbuster, why did they chose white people?

      The Princess in this film was supposed to be a Persian actress, but when that fell through (Iran would not let her leave the country), why did they not look for a second Persian actress? Why did they then go for a white British actress?

      What about Sarah Shahi? What about Bahar Soomekh? Shahi was in two major television shows (The L Word and Life) and Bahar Soomekh was in Mission Impossible 3 and Crash.

    • AdamC says:

      12:08pm | 07/06/10

      “But we’re talking about an industry that has no problem finding Middle Eastern and Persian/Iranian people to cast in the “negative” parts, as terrorists and evil-doers”

      Really? When? The last time I remember Hollywood casting a Persian or Arab as a villain in a completely discretionary context was True Lies - over fifteen years ago!

      There is something ironic about this discussion, in that it is superficially about Persian/Iranian national identity but it would be completely bizarre outside of a western discourse. The idea that a casting director in Hollywood should consider the impact of his casting decisions on the ethnic self-image of ethnic Persians in anglophone countries is quite outlanish really.

      This is especially so when the film in question, while supposedly using some Persian stylistic elements, is a fantasy set in a non-historical world.

    • maybe says:

      12:21pm | 07/06/10

      ‘What about Sarah Shahi? What about Bahar Soomekh?’  Whilst they are hotties, they are in their 30’s, and maybe they didn’t audition or have crap agents.  Gemma is a young hot 24 year old biddy on th up and up in her carrer.  And she could probably do a better job of the generic english accent.

    • Sick and tired of it says:

      01:31pm | 07/06/10

      @ Adam C:

      Have you never heard of the television series “24” which has done a good job of portraying the average Arab who is your next-door neighbor as a “terrorist”. Orientalism manifests itself in other ways as well—the exotic “Jasmine” type Arab woman, or the semi-terrorist male (think Sayid Jarrah from LOST (who was incidentally portrayed by a British Indian). He worked under Saddam Hussein and specialized in torture.

      The two women I mentioned, by the way, are Iranian-American. If we say our country celebrates diversity, why don’t we show it in film and other media? Why is it suddenly “outlandish” that casting directors should keep in mind that a “Persian-themed” film should, in fact, have Iranian actors?

      Everyone realizes that Prince of Persia is not a documentary film on the History Channel. However I find it interesting that everything else is “Persian/Iranian” save for the people. If the Persian elements didn’t really matter, why didn’t they just set the film in France in the 1920s or Ghana in the 1700s?

      Divocring the actors from the ethnicities they are supposed to play is just plain lazy.

    • Sick and tired of it says:

      01:48pm | 07/06/10

      @ Maybe:

      Those two look younger, at least to me.

      Halle Berry is 43 years old, and she has been rated the most beautiful woman in the world for years. Rachel McAdams and Charlize Theron are both in their 30s. If you’re talking about women in action, Angelina Jolie starred in “Wanted” when she was at least 30. The lead gal in “Watchmen” Malin Ă…kerman was at least 30 when she was in the movie, although some fans complained that she looked too young to play the part.

      On the flip side, there have been some complains about Scarlett Johansson being too young to play Black Widow (she’s 25).

    • AdamC says:

      02:02pm | 07/06/10

      Sick and Tired, I am happy to accept that it is ‘lazy’ not to have any Persians in Prince of Persia. But if that was all that was being argued, there would be no article. As I see it, the contention is that casting white Americans and Brits as Persians denigrates the Persian ethnic identity of immigrants in Anglophone nations. That is what I find outlandish.

      It may be that you don’t endorse that view, but given you trotted out that ridiculous fallacy about Arab/Iranian Hollywood villains, I felt justified in assuming you do.

      And, on 24, as I recall, that show was about an American anti-terrorism unit. Clearly, they were going to bump into some Arab terrorists. It is hardly evidence of Hollywood singling out Arabs or Persians as villains. In fact, it is amazing the extent to which there is little Hollywood use of the ‘war on terror’ as a theme for mainstream films. The art-house set have made a few, largely unwatched, anti-war movies that mined it for ideas, but commercial directors have eschewed it almost entirely.

    • Sick and tired of it says:

      03:00pm | 07/06/10

      @ AdamC

      The point is that in all of the television shows and movies from Hollywood and other avenues, Arabs and Iranians (Persians) are most often portrayed as terrorists, if they are portrayed at all. In 24, they are still preying on the “fear” of Arabs and Persians as your neighbors, because hey, they could turn out to be terrorists. Isn’t that a little stale?

      You do realize that many Persian/Iranian Americans are actually not immigrants, and are, in fact, the same as your average American. This has more to do about fair representation than white people sullying the name of Persians.

      With Prince of Persia, we had an awesome chance to cast an Iranian American in the lead of a major blockbuster, but as usual, chose not to.

    • AdamC says:

      03:58pm | 07/06/10

      “With Prince of Persia, we had an awesome chance to cast an Iranian American in the lead of a major blockbuster, but as usual, chose not to.”

      This is exactly what I mean. This comment males no sense to me - why would one necessarily cast an ethnic Persian to play the Prince of Persia? Just because it would be ‘awesome’? I mean, I get that it is a little silly to have people who are obviously of northern European ethnicity (i.e, don’t look at all Persian) as leads in a film set in a fictionalised Persian Empire, but it doesn’t offend me.  And I certainly don’t see why it is some giant leap for multicutural mankind to have roles cast based on ethnicity. Quite the contrary really.

    • Jay says:

      09:23am | 07/06/10

      Thank you for writing this article. It’s really sad that a lot of people don’t understand and ignore what movies like Prince of Persia, 21, Dragonball Evolution, and The Last Airbender are reinforcing in young ethnic and racial minorities minds in that their skin color and physical characteristics are wrong and abnormal.

      “After all there’s never been a shortage of ethnic characters to play terrorists and villains in Hollywood action movies.”

      That and there is no shortage of ethnic characters to celebrate the coming of their white saviors.

    • Markus says:

      10:33am | 07/06/10

      Dragonball is an anime.
      Are you honestly crying racism because the live-action version of Goku did not have giant eyes that take up half his head and a mouth that varies between the size of a 5 cent piece and the size of a watermelon?

    • Michael says:

      12:10pm | 07/06/10

      I’d say he’s crying because the whole dragonball movie was just so horrible it litterally made him and most of the cinema cry raspberry

    • mcleveland says:

      09:29am | 07/06/10

      If nothing matters, and movies are “just movies”, then why did you even bother reading that article?

      It seems to me that you just came here to stir up something. It bothers me that someone can have access to the internet and not understand how influential media and entertainment can be, especially to those who are young.

      Most people are directly influenced by what they see on the television. Do you know how many young black girls felt empowered when Oprah was shown on network television? What about the fact that Lost has so many varied people of different ethnicities? What about Logo? Univision? If entertainment is just “entertainment”, why do we need these things?

      I think it is ridiculous, and a little short-sighted to use the same, age-old argument of “it’s just a movie”. If movie are “just movies”, then I doubt people would even want to see them at all. We are affected in one way or another by what we see on the screen. If watching white people spray-tanned up to represent Iranian people is fine by you, then okay, move along. If it doesn’t affect you, move along and enjoy your life, while some of us try to make a change for our kids. I don’t want to live in a world where my children are told they can’t be represented onscreen. Maybe you’re okay with that…but I refuse.

      Ignorance is bliss, they say, but please stop trying to silence others who desire to make a change.

    • Angus says:

      11:33am | 07/06/10

      So you think people should only read (and then comment on) an article if they agree with it?  The possibility that perhaps the writer of the article really IS “reading too much into it” shouldn’t even be considered or discussed?  Why even have a facility for people to post comments at all, then?  We could just assume that anybody reading the article agrees with it completely and then move on with our lives, secure in the knowledge that everybody’s opinion is the same as ours, thus proving that we are right and those nasty Hollywood producers are wrong. 

      Fortunately for us all, we have important, self-righteous people like yourself to show us the error of our ways.  The only person who seems to be trying to silence anybody here is YOU, by suggesting people not make any comment unless they’re going to stick to the line laid down by the article.

    • Sick and tired of it says:

      01:54pm | 07/06/10

      Actually, Angus, If it doesn’t matter, you wouldn’t be here, discussing it.

      You think it’s important that people don’t focus on the ethnicities of the people playing the parts, while others thing it does matter and it’s important to take into account who is playing what part.

      TThose are the actual arguments. But saying that “it’s just a movie” is lazy and a bit non-participatory, especially if we’re actually discussing it.

    • Angus says:

      03:55pm | 07/06/10

      Where in my post did I say it doesn’t matter?  I was objecting to the assertion that others were somehow trying to silence those who desire to make a change.  This coming in the same post that somebody with a different opinion was accused of just commenting to stir up trouble and they should not only have not posted a comment that dared to disagree with the article’s position, but should not have even read the article itself in the first place.

      Telling somebody they shouldn’t read or comment on an article if they don’t agree with its position is stifling discussion and debate far more than somebody stating their perfectly valid opinion that the movie is “just a movie”.

      Where was all this outpouring of righteous indignation over racially inappropriate casting when they cast a black boy to portray the young Bob Dylan in I’m Not There?  Or casting of Ossie Davis (a black man) playing an elderly John F Kennedy in Bubba Ho Tep?  Sure, that wasn’t the most serious movie ever made, but neither is Prince of Persia.

      There’s another film adaptation of a video game coming out soon, this time it’s Kane & Lynch in which Jamie Foxx (a black actor) is portraying a character who was white in the original videogame.  So I look forward to similar expressions of anger and disgust then.  Or maybe we won’t bother, because “it’s just a movie”.

    • Did I just waste 5 minutes on a xenophobic? says:

      04:46pm | 07/06/10

      Wow you and the writer need to get out the brdge building gear.
      I wonder if the villains in ME movies are umm caucasians - Americans even? 
      Bollywood uses an Aussie, Tanya Zaetta, not an Indian but someone who has a look they want.
      If you are so upset go and get a script, producer etc etc and make a movie.  Or boycott the movie. 
      Jake is in it for star value - box office - profits.

    • Chris L says:

      07:52pm | 07/06/10

      You raise a fair point, Angus, but Ossie Davis was playing a black guy who thought he was JFK. Anyone can think they’re JFK.

    • AdamC says:

      09:33am | 07/06/10

      Talk about a Trojan Horse of an article! No ethnic Persian stars in the latest (faux-Persia-themed) Hollywood series of action set pieces becomes black kids like white dolls - someone call Mahmoud Ahmadinejad!

      I would hate to think what you made of 300!

    • Adam Diver says:

      09:34am | 07/06/10

      “sad and disheartening to realise that even though there was wide outcry in China and Japan over the movie it went with barely a blimp in western audiences who failed to notice the difference.”

      OH no, we cant tell the difference and then segregate these communities properly. Imagine my embarrasment after hurling derogatory whale eating, sword fighting, raw fish eating related abuse at an asian person, only to find out they were in fact Chinese. I suggest we have everyones forehead tattoed with thier nationality so that we can properly identify these people in public and in movies.

    • Y says:

      09:42am | 07/06/10

      Morgan freeman played nelson Mandela; Orlando bloom played a clueless French guy who spouted gibberish as Arabic in Kingdom of Heaven, Johnny Depp has played an Irishmen/gypsy/brit , and Ben Kingsly played a SPECTACULAR Iranian in “house of sand and fog”.  ect ect.  i’m half Iranian, grew up in Iran. i never thought the lead drummer from Aryan (famous iranian band) would pull of a British accent and play a fantasy prince a la rehashed Aladdin. Let move on together, ok?

    • Zeta says:

      09:46am | 07/06/10

      When I was a kid, I’d get picked on mercilessly at Greek school because I didn’t look Greek at all, my last name was not Greek, and by 12, I still couldn’t grow a moustache like the rest of the boys and girls. Yet inexplicably, all the Greek heroes of ancient myth portrayed in film were white, blue eyed and blonde.

      I confronted my grandfather with this one day, who explained, in his broken English, that in ancient times, all Greeks were blonde and blue eyed, and that it was because the Turks invaded and raped all our women that our people grew progressively darker. This made me feel better about things, until I was kicked out of Greek school for telling someone that I might not look Greek, but at least my mother wasn’t raped by a Turk.

    • Petros says:

      11:25am | 07/06/10

      Best post ever.

      LMAO.

    • Cimbom says:

      11:27am | 07/06/10

      Unfortunately, your grandfather has a warped understanding of biology. Greeks were not blonde and blue-eyed, as much as you may like this to be the case. I’m sure you know of the Greek word “barbaros”. That was used to describe the blonde, blue-eyed people from the North (of Europe). Also, the evil eye amulet features a blue eye. How can what your grandad claims be true then? The only reason Greek characters look that way in movies is because white (Northern European) people want to claim the cultural and political innovations from the region. They do that by pretending they look the same as them. Greeks have “non-white” features due to African admixture.

    • joshgtv says:

      12:48pm | 07/06/10

      Cimbom do you have a dictionary to hand? “Humour” starts with H.

    • Good One says:

      01:27pm | 07/06/10

      BaHhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

    • stephen says:

      07:01pm | 07/06/10

      Just had a good look at the word ‘Greek’.
      Perhaps, ‘Greak’ ?
      The Greeks have already paid their dues.
      Or are you a Representative Man ?
      Zeta ?

    • Jenni says:

      02:34pm | 08/06/10

      I think I love you Zeta - will you marry me? wink

    • Eleanor says:

      03:32pm | 09/06/10

      I recall reading somewhere that blonde hair and blue eyes were considered signs of divinity/divine favour in Ancient Greece, and as such were incorporated into the portrayal of their heroes.

      That’s just what I remember, though, so don’t hold me to it as gospel.

    • TheRealDave says:

      10:16am | 07/06/10

      I thought Iranians took great pains to point out they were of Ayran descent and aren’t fond of being descibed as Arab or ‘Middle Eastern’ ??

      You think you’ve got it bad…I still have nightmares over the Wing Commander movie…...  *shudder*

    • Zeta says:

      10:47am | 07/06/10

      You are probably the only person who ever saw the Wing Commander movie.

    • Chris L says:

      07:57pm | 07/06/10

      No, Zeta, I saw it too. I still randomly break into incosolable tears, despite the absolute hotness of Saffron Burrows! Strueth, the Kilrathi in the computer games were better done than in the movie (not to even start on the plot, dialogue or acting “tallent”!)

    • MRCAB says:

      10:26am | 07/06/10

      Nice article, but, wow, a lot of fail in the comments section.

    • Mato says:

      10:27am | 07/06/10

      I get what your saying, but Jake’s character was a street urchin adopted by the king.  They never say he was persian.  He could have been an albino, but still a prince of persia.  Gyllenhaal is also half Jewish (mum’s side) which makes the casting choice interesting!
      The Disney/Bruckheimer mob also made Pirates of the caribbean which also randomised history. 
      When you see the modern versions of Prince of persia, he’s pretty anglo in them too…
      All that said- I thought the movie was an entertaining piece of escapeism.. and I think that’s all it should be seen as…

    • Hayley says:

      10:45am | 07/06/10

      It’s not a topic I can really relate to (english heritage with some dutch thrown in), but your article was thought provoking and I understand your point. Thanks. It was a good read.

    • Paul says:

      10:48am | 07/06/10

      Overinvested in a video game much?  If you feel culturally maligned by one media conglomerate’s packaging of another media conglomerate’s rendering of an archetype into a game (do you think anyone involved really cared about Persia?  Or where it is?  or what it is?  It’s a backdrop to a generic good v evil set-up just with a different variety of monster and a sand-toned colour palette)  you need to go outside and take a walk in the sunshine.  Sure Jake sucks, but the whole thing sucks - we all know it sucks.  It’s just a stupid movie.  Like it is a stupid video game.  Look, if you want to write a cultural studies PhD on this stuff, go for it - god knows my seventeenth century english lesbian womens writing thesis is a rollicking page turner - but how about pitching it to your lecturer and not us?

    • Becky says:

      11:38am | 07/06/10

      Because the discussion of racism is only an academic pursuit? While the majority of people interested in clicking this story might already know all this sucks, talking about racism in a big Hollywood blockbuster might just be a good way to get people who haven’t considered the topic give it a little thought. I don’t really believe that Hollywood -will- do better but that doesn’t mean it’s pointless to say it should.

    • Chris L says:

      08:03pm | 07/06/10

      I get the feeling you got fragged in Counterstrike a lot Paul, or perhaps got overly frustrated trying to get Crash to jump in the right direction? Don’t hate games just ‘cause you are a noob!

    • Sick and tired of it says:

      10:51am | 07/06/10

      There is a huge problem in Hollywood (and in television, and in the media) of portraying the world as nearly completely white when in fact it is the complete opposite. And when they do portray these “others”, they do it smugly and pat themselves on the back (see: M. Knight Shyamalan and everyone else involved with The Last Airbender movie).

      Major Hollywood writers and directors like Woody Allen have said that the reason why their movies are so “white” (i.e. have a lot of white actors) is because that’s the environment they live in: white people usually are with other white people.

      A television series like Sex and The City, they explain, features so many white people because rich white women usually only have rich white friends.

      Cool. We get it. Even though New York City has the largest number of African Americans in the United States, we get it.

      But if that’s truly the case, why is it that Hollywood and television producers seem incapable of using non-white actors if the stories they use feature non-white people?

      If the Prince of Persia takes place in an all-Persian and Middle Eastern environment, why are most of the principal actors white? If The Last Airbender takes place in an Asian-inspired environment, why is most of the principal cast white? Why is it that the “trend” nowadays is for white models to portray themselves as black people (using dark skin paint/makeup and afro-wigs/hair)?

      Even if you don’t agree with the premise that there is a problem, what could possibly be the downside of casting more non-white actors?  What could possibly be the downside of selecting black models?

    • Markus says:

      11:16am | 07/06/10

      Again, Airbender is an anime, a fantasy one at that.
      By the logic some are using here, I could accuse you of racism for assuming that because an animated character was designed by a Japanese person, then they must be Japanese.

    • Anna says:

      11:17am | 07/06/10

      You’re right, I bet every movie made in another culture about an American/English story actually casts American/English people. They cast white people because the majority of actors in that country are white. Asian movies have Asian casts and that isn’t discriminatory?

      The only thing that annoyed me about PoP was their atrocious accents and the illogical ending - other than that is was a good time.

    • maybe says:

      12:33pm | 07/06/10

      The fact the ‘Persia’is in the name doesn’t stop the setting for Prince of Persia (movie and all the games) being set in a fantasy land that is very loosely based on any real historical content.  The thing was never trying to be either historically or culturally acurate.

    • citizn says:

      02:04pm | 07/06/10

      Actually, the last airbender isn’t even japanese, it’s american. It’s pretty much isn’t even anime in the traditional sense. So, an american cartoon turned into a movie with a large amount of indian people cast? hmm

    • Sick and tired of it says:

      02:09pm | 07/06/10

      @ Marcus

      The creators of The Last Airbender said it was an Asian-inspired atmosphere. They used Chinese in the show, and the clothing, hairstyles, and cultural practices were all Asian, East Asian or Inuit. Not to mention that two of the characters have very dark skin typical of the people they are supposed to represent (Inuit).

      The creators of TLA are American, BTW, and they have also said that many of the facial features of the characters they drew were based off of family members, friends and celebrities that were Asian.

      Logically speaking, if a Japanese person makes an anime about a white European person, who had red hair and blue eyes, complete with a non-Japanese name and cultural practices more similar to Scotland than Japan, I would have to assume that the person was not Japanese and was in fact, Scottish.

      How is this hard?

      @ Anna

      We’re talking about a historical trend in film and television here, specifically in the United States, not isolated incidences of cross-cultural casting. Get out of the conversation if you don’t really want to have the conversation.

      Japan is 99% Japanese. It seems logical that they would have an extremely hard time casting non-Japanese actors. The United States is nearly 3 times the size of Japan, with sizable Asian American, African American, Native American and Latino American populations. The film industry in the United States is also huge, much larger than that of Japan’s.

      @ Maybe

      I’m confused about how you’re trying to tie in “historically accurate” with casting Persians/Iranians. The thing would still be historically inaccurate with a Persian/Iranian at the helm. That is not the issue we’re discussing here.

    • maybe says:

      04:35pm | 07/06/10

      Sick and tired of it - you conveniently left out half my point, that it wasn’t meant to be ‘culturally accurate’ either, which has to do with what is being discussed, otherwise why even mention it?

      Anyway, my points are based on the fact that the Prince in the movie represents the prince in the games very accurately.  And it boils down to tha fact that this was a film adaption of video games that depicted equally non-ethnically persian sorts as persians, which the Author says she was a fan of. makes not a great deal of sense.

    • TheRealDave says:

      11:18am | 07/06/10

      Try Mick Jagger as Ned Kelly ...... yeah, now who’s got it bad huh??

      :p

    • casey. says:

      11:24am | 07/06/10

      Prince of Persia is the virtual child of an American, which was then distributed by an American software developer.

    • Violetta says:

      11:28am | 07/06/10

      This is typical hollywood white washing, I watched a Nickeloden cartoon “avatar: The Last Airbender” now they have decided to make it a live action version, for the “water tribe” which in the show is obviously innuit character’s they decided to cast two white people for the roles, one being from the twilight franchise, the main villan in the first film “prince zuko” was originally going to be cast as Jessie McCartny but now they cast Dev patel, if you watched the series you would see that this is just all wrong, hollywood keeps white washing tv shows and movies, then you get the brainless morons who say it’s just a movie quit fussing! Obviously they are more conditioned to racisim and not stand up to it and say no this is wrong, which is why they will continue to get away with it. Much like the tv show adaption of the Earthsea books.

    • Luke says:

      11:29am | 07/06/10

      Alittle more “reality” to this film would have gone a long way…

    • Kurt says:

      11:30am | 07/06/10

      If you put an arab in the lead role and make the movie authentic in ‘Persian’ ethnicity it will lack a wide appeal to western society. In other words the more arab it is the less the west will want to watch it. That’s the reason like it or not. Putting it in a dollars and cents terms, the more you make it to the wider audience the more of a profit you’ll turn as a result ...its not personal its just business

    • Pete says:

      01:59pm | 07/06/10

      Someone should point out that Persians aren’t Arabs.

    • Red says:

      06:17pm | 09/06/10

      Whether it was personal or not is not the issue. You’re basically saying that the ASSUMPTION that a Middle Eastern leading cast wouldn’t fetch more money than a Caucasian one is true, despite the fact that it isn’t. ‘Slumdog Millionaire’ proved that when it nominated for ten Oscars and won eight, including the Oscar for Best Picture. They had the most wins for any film in 2008.

      Yet this film, with it’s leading cast of Caucasian actors, including a ‘named’ actor, isn’t anywhere CLOSE to that.

    • Alan says:

      11:47am | 07/06/10

      Your article covers many related topics, and triggers many related thoughts. First, I’m reminded of how “Dances With Wolves” was considered a landmark, for using actual Native Americans to play the Movie Native Americans [ Indians to the older non politically correct generation ].

      In your “white is better” argument, I’m reminded of my time in Thailand. Thai skin can vary from light to dark. However, “common” field workers tend to build up a tan. Meanwhile, upper classes work indoors. As a result, darker skin is considered a sign of poverty… and the number of Thai adverts for skin whitening products has to be seen to be believed.

      As for accuracy in Hollywood movies - most of the world has long given up looking for truth in a Hollywood movie. The depths were truly exposed, however, in “Pearl Harbour”. There are several heoic stories about what Americans did on the fateful day of the Japanese invasion. When these stories were mangled by the movie, even the Americans were disgusted - part of the reason why the movie tanked at the box-office.

    • Lily says:

      11:51am | 07/06/10

      In Cantonese movies women like Michelle Yeoh - who’s Malaysian reigned supreme. Maggie Q who’s American by birth and part Vietnamese was often cast in lead roles in Cantonese movies.

      Sam Worthington - an Australian - was cast a Greek in Jason and the Argonauts, Monica Belluci has been cast as a French woman despite being Italian.

      Russell Crowe was cast as a Spanish- Roman legion in Gladiator. The Pablo Escabar character in Blow was played by a New-Zealand born Maori. Desperate Housewife star Felicity Huffman stared as a transgender person in TransAmerica. Robin Willimas played a gay guy in the Bird CAge - the list goes on.

      Unless your painting an “Anglo-Actor ”  to play Malcolm X or even using “Anglo-Actors” to portray Asian people i.e Katherine Hepburn in the “the Good Earth”, movies like Prince of Persia are fantasy-based movies that’s not based on real historic characters. For me I could care less that M.Night Shamalyan’s The Last Air Bender has “anglo” actors because guess what it’s based on a cartoon.

      Although it irritates me that the new Karate Kid is so named because the movie centres around “kung fu” - two very separate and distinctive martial arts styles.

      Lets say if we had a Persian-made movie adn there was a “anglo” in it would they cast someone who was English or would they use someone natvie to Persia and dress them up? I would’ve been offended if this movie was a historical prepresentation of Persian culture and they used Jake Gyllenhal - but come on its on the same lines as Clash of the Titans!!!

    • Lilys fan says:

      02:42pm | 07/06/10

      Well said Lily

    • Sick and tired of it says:

      03:54pm | 07/06/10

      Michelle Yeoh is actually ethnically Chinese. (She’s Chinese Malaysian, in the same vein that people are Chinese American) She speaks English, Malay and Chinese (Cantonese). Even still, Michelle Yeoh plays Asian characters (Chinese, Japanese, Malay, etc.) because it is believable that she could be that character.

      Sam Worthington has played ethincally white characters, never ethnically Asian characters. It is reasonable that Sam Worthington might resemble a Greek person as they share the same heritage. Monica Belluci played Mary Magdalene, and was also supposed to play the Indian woman Sonia Gandhi, which is quite ridiculous because, even though on the surface she has dark hair and dark eyes, she is not Arab and she is not Indian. Same for the rest (Russel Crowe, etc.)

      The problem isn’t even that people are playing other ethnicities. If it were equal across the board—-Asian people playing whites, blacks playing Asians, Native Americans playing Arabs, with the same frequency—-I doubt it would be an issue.

      What we’re dealing wth is the exclusive trend of white actors playing non-white characters (real or imagined) in major Hollywood films.

      It’s the complete opposite of Shakespeare in theater—where people of various ethnicites play any character, no matter the ethnicity or race.

    • Sick of Sick of it all says:

      10:00am | 09/06/10

      @Sick and tired of it

      Hang on, hang on, you say “Even still, Michelle Yeoh plays Asian characters (Chinese, Japanese, Malay, etc.) because it is believable that she could be that character.” - After you supported the fact that the writer said that Chinese were used instead of Japanese in Memoirs of a Geisha? Hypocrite much? I’m sure Japanese people LOVE being mistaken as Chinese, just like Mexicans vs the rest of South America, Jews and Palestinians, French and Anyone else.

      Your point and opinions are now totally moot, and bunk. You are not trying to make a point, just defending a besieged and ill advised position.

    • Kurt says:

      11:55am | 07/06/10

      If young people are taking their role models from movies, we have a much bigger problem than ‘a lack of ethnic equality in movies’

      Sara if this is how you get your role models you need to seek help. Also if you expect hollywood to be ‘realistic’ then I have bad news for you.

    • Sick and tired of it says:

      04:28pm | 07/06/10

      It would be a completely different world if kids didn’t find role models in people on television and the media.

      Little kids have real life heroes like presidents and astronauts and historical figures, and then they have heroes like Superman, Wonder Woman and a myriad of other imagined characters.

      Denying this is denying human nature, and denying the impact television and the media has had on shaping the identities of children and even adults is really ignoring the problem. Movies, television and film have shaped entire generations. Think of how many astronauts have credited television shows like Star Trek in influencing them when they were children.

      Mae Jemison (the first African American astronaut) found a role model in Lt. Uhura, and it is the reason why she became an astronaut.

    • Hutch says:

      12:00pm | 07/06/10

      When was the last time an Iranian won an a world recognised acting award?

    • N says:

      02:14pm | 07/06/10

      1-2 years ago. The chick who plays the aunt in Stoning of Soraya. Don’t remember the movie but think it was an Oscar or a Golden Globe.

    • maybe says:

      12:04pm | 07/06/10

      Can I just point out that the origianl Prince of persia was a very pink skinned, blond haired little pixelate.  Jake Gyllenhaal actually resembles the Prince from the games on which the movie was based.  So I don’t understand how you had no problem with the games (because they weren’t real people maybe?) butthe film offends your sensibilities?

    • A Richards says:

      12:32pm | 07/06/10

      I think there is alot of anti-american sentiment here. Fact is, they are the ones making the movie, therefore they get to choose. After all it is a business and more people will front up to see Jake as the lead than they will with some Iranian know one knows. Plus if Iran had any decent actors they would of done this movie themselves and made the money!! Get over it.

    • Jonathan says:

      12:36pm | 07/06/10

      The movie was so bad I think you should be grateful no Iranian actors were associated with it.

    • A Bob says:

      12:40pm | 07/06/10

      “Have you ever loved anything as a child only to grow and have someone completely ruin it for you?”

      Welcome to adult life.

    • Markus says:

      01:04pm | 07/06/10

      Clearly she is yet to be been defiled by Rule 34. I envy those whose childhoods have not been shattered thusly :(

    • 6c legs says:

      01:00pm | 07/06/10

      Hollywood has been doing this since it began making movies for mass entertainment.
      Anglos playing Native Americans.
      Anglos putting on “blackface”
      Yanks doing Southern accents, Southerners doing Yank accents
      Americans doing anyother type of world accent.
      Americans playing every ethniciity known to man.
      Humans playing (space) Aliens…
      Heck, hollywood has even had humans dressed in animal suits (as an animal lover I’d prefer that to stressing out animals)

      Hollywood has just found its latest ‘flavour of the month’ - the Middle East.  Methinks that you need to go stand in line behind all the other people that it has insulted over the decades!

      (i just love how youth always think that *its* (always) the *first and only one* to discover something that the rest of us just somehow missed to see..lol)

    • Darren says:

      01:00pm | 07/06/10

      What would I know. I’m from mongrel convict heritage. How could I be racist if I have most races in me somewhere?

    • mike says:

      01:02pm | 07/06/10

      I think you are racial profiling.

    • Baffled says:

      01:08pm | 07/06/10

      Wow. I still get amazed at how easily people like to dive in and criticise fantasy films. So the fact that he is not persian is horrible but magic daggers and what ever else are acceptable? Seriously, I think we are all becoming far too PC for our own good. They say that people are developing more allergies due to us living in a more sanitary environment than previous generations. I think it is starting to apply to our egos as well. Look back at some of the more more famous movies over the years from the 50’s etc. How many “authentic” characters were there then? Face paint was acceptable in those days for pities sake!
      Get over yourself!

    • Metro says:

      01:13pm | 07/06/10

      Get over yourself, Croatians came from Persia 8000 years ago, and I’m not crying… and we all originate from the same woman in Africa 200,000 years ago! The movie was fun… and if they had to spray on tan Gemma Arterton for the role… it was worth it.. heck, they covered her in oil for James Bond!

    • dean says:

      01:15pm | 07/06/10

      I agree, i was devasted to hear Jake had been cast as the prince of presia. no doubt he is a great actor, but come on, i wanted to see a real prince of persia not some overated hollywood actor.

    • Russel Crowe says:

      02:45pm | 07/06/10

      No, he’s not a great actor.

    • Bengeck says:

      01:25pm | 07/06/10

      I thought this was going to be about Rule 34. i was disapointed.

    • matisyahu says:

      01:38pm | 07/06/10

      I agree with you a little bit but there is a seriously long history of actors playing characters and ethnicities which aren’t the same as their real ones. Australians play Americans and vice versa. Jews are played by gentiles and vice versa. British play Germans. Straight people play gay people. It’s called acting! In the end, Prince of Persia is an American movie mostly for viewing in America and Disney’s spending hundreds of millions on it and it just comes down to money. You also shouldn’t try to sully Jake’s good name and accuse him of being a thief.

    • Ann says:

      01:53pm | 07/06/10

      Avatar: The Last Airbender, Billy Sing mini-series,  countless others and now this as well.

      It’s no longer cool to play “yellowface” “blackface” blah blah… it’s much easier now to just “white-wash” them - you know it makes it easier for the majority public to digest.

      PFFT!
      I’m with you on this one Sara - great article.
      People who don’t understand this - obviously come from the majority ethnicity - race doesn’t matter to them - because “White Privilege” affords them that.

    • Hayden says:

      02:52pm | 07/06/10

      So because someone may have a difference of opinion than you - you automatically claim that ‘race doesn’t matter to them’ ? Almost basically calling someone a racist - even though you know nothing about them or their background.    How dare you accuse people in such a way…...

    • Brett says:

      10:41am | 09/06/10

      The Billy Sing thing is regrettable, but was done on a budget of like $10k, with no actors actually being paid. The director could not find any Chinese actors to play the roles, so had to go with whites. If you give him $100k I’m sure he can hire some Chinese actors and re-shoot the film, he would no doubt love to.

    • Arimura Gao says:

      02:09pm | 07/06/10

      To Sara:

      When I read your article, I totally understand and symphasize what you are saying in this. As a Japanese-American, I too know how it felt when I saw a certain show get whitewashed and changed. It DID feel like I was not good enough, AND like my own cultural identity was being stolen and replaced. Our culture is ‘cool,’ but the people who make that culture are ‘not cool enough.’  I do not know if it’s because of narrow-mindedness OR a certain form of ‘power’ being manipulated, but I know for a fact that it is very discouraging and almost crushing to see it.

      You article hits a lot of good points, and is very well-written. Please keep on writing, and keep speaking out!

    • colour what colour says:

      02:16pm | 07/06/10

      Why didn’t they just use Robert Downey Jr.
      A White American playing a White Australian playing a Black American.
      (Tropic Thunder).
      Problem solved.

    • N says:

      03:22pm | 07/06/10

      I like that.

    • The Cricket says:

      02:29pm | 07/06/10

      I agree with those who argue the casting was based primarily on the potential for box office returns by using “big name” Hollywood stars, rather than racism. And if I’d invested in the movie, I’d be fully behind that decision! Most movies lose money and lots of it.
      In saying that, I understand Sara’s disappointment and agree with much of what she wrote. There are so very few positive Middle Eastern role models in western culture, and a dashing Persian hero would greatly lift the self-esteem of many young people from that background.
      CNN recently did a story covering a study where young people were shown drawings depicting six children standing in a row, white at one end, getting darker and black at the other end. They were asked, “Which is the smart child?” or “Which is the most attractive child.” The kids, white or black, consistently chose the lightest-skinned child for positive attributes.
      When asked “Who is the dumb child?” or “Who is the ugly child?”, they opted for the black kid. It was quite sad to see, and evidence that while “only a movie”, casting decisions in films can have a powerful impact on audiences.

    • BB says:

      12:09pm | 12/06/10

      I’ve always hated that quiz as it is introducing the idea to children that the colour of their skin is related to either good or bad qualities.  I’ve wondered with that quiz if the kids just chose the one that looked the least like them for the negative comments so they couldn’t be thought of as having that negative trait.
      But on the article, the thing that did confuse me is how can you base your betrayal of your culture on a movie of a computer game that originally ripped off your culture using very sterotypical characters just to make money?

    • Hello says:

      02:31pm | 07/06/10

      The studio Goldie Hawn pitched Private Benjamin to wanted another actress because the lead character in the movie was Jewish.  Goldie is born and bred Jewish!  Such is life.

    • Erin says:

      02:40pm | 07/06/10

      Morgan Freeman played the Persian character Azeem in Robin Hood Prince of Thieves.  Did he steal your identity too for being too black?

    • BTS says:

      02:58pm | 07/06/10

      Such nastiness Erin.

    • N says:

      03:16pm | 07/06/10

      As far as I remember, he was a Moor and they are black and Muslim.

    • Erin says:

      03:34pm | 07/06/10

      Merely making a point that I think this is a load of tripe.

      As for all of you whinging about the English accent, if you had actually played the game you’d recall that Dastan had an English accent in the game too. And who said the movie wasn’t authentic?

    • H says:

      02:53pm | 07/06/10

      They didn’t use real Vampires for Twilight either….

    • Phil says:

      02:54pm | 07/06/10

      Why dont you write an interesting article about something interesting like the senseless violence over there.

    • Mark says:

      05:10pm | 07/06/10

      Because that would make Sara deal with her own biases. Why deal with the human rights crisis in the Middle East when she can bag the West, and her particular target (white people) over the casting of movie roles.

    • Dan says:

      04:45am | 08/06/10

      So, because she’s of Iranian heritage, she’s obligated to write an article about the Middle East? Right, so I guess since you two guys are presumably white Australians, you will only post on topics regarding the White Australian policy, racism by whites to non-whites etc…

      She has a right to write about whatever she wants.

    • EM says:

      03:00pm | 07/06/10

      Ok then, I’m assuming that you also believe that when Iran makes a movie they too should use actors of correct ethnicity?  So if they have an American in the movie, that character must be played by an American; a Brit by a Brit, etc.  What a crock or crap.  They can use whoever they damn well please; if they want to use some Iranian guy to play an Australian in a movie then more power to them, w it doesn’t change my live one iota…

      Why so precious? 

    • SM says:

      03:07pm | 07/06/10

      I agree that Hollywood should do more for there casting than just relying on a big name to draw a crowd. But they are in that business to make money. Yes they have a huge problem with people of different ethnicity being caste as black/white/yellow/red but as long as tickets get sold they don’t care. Besides that its Disney, so who isn’t surprised that they have xenophobic tendencies, just look to Walt for the example.

      One thing i did find amusing though was i didn’t know that Persians had Toff English accents. At least they could have got that right, reminds me of Leonardo Dicaprio as Louis XIV in “man in the iron mask.” shocking

    • NA says:

      03:27pm | 07/06/10

      What an endless debate about a movie!
      Lets ask the ppl who feel Prince of Persia should have been Persian to make the movie….

      At the end of the day it is about money, box office
      Sure they could get a good Persian actor to play the lead, but would the producer recoup the money?

      I’m sure this argument is stale – who played Gandhi in the original movie?  Not an Indian! And the list of examples go on…..
      That’s because movies use “actors” – people who are not what they are to fit into someones character, straight ppl portraying gay, single people playing married, young people playing old,  etc etc.

      Don’t people have other pressing problems on their plates then getting worked up on movies (movies = entertainment / fantasy)
      This is not a documentary!!

    • WombatQueen says:

      11:30am | 12/06/10

      Err… Gandhi was played by Ben Kingsley whose birth name was Krishna Bhanji. His ethnicity is half Indian half English. So yeah, they got someone of Indian heritage to play Gandhi. Thanks for playing, though.

    • Jannette says:

      03:46pm | 07/06/10

      This reminds me of the absolute despair I felt in the recent Dragon Ball Movie where Goku was played by Justin Chatwin, and not a Japanese arse-kicking monkey-turning karate master.

    • Ando says:

      05:02pm | 07/06/10

      Goku isn’t even from Earth, so why would his character be best suited by a Japanese actor? Is it just because the creators were Japanese?

      By this logic, Jake G was the correct choice for Prince of P given the creators were American.

    • Violetta says:

      03:47pm | 07/06/10

      As i mentioned before the Earthsea novel series was adapted into a television show, the author specifically wrote her lead characters to be dark skinned, in the show they totally changed them to be white. You can read her response here http://slate.com/id/2111107/
      There is an issue with Hollywood racism and if you ignore it then you are silently agreeing with them. I have read comments saying “oh but it is just a fantasy movie” yes that is true but it also has source material to draw from which clearly states the writers intentions and setting.
      Stop defending clear cut cases of racism, just because you can’t be bothered to stop think about it.

    • AD says:

      04:39pm | 07/06/10

      Did you and she object just as strongly to the animated movie adaptation where they were all speaking Japanese?  Or is it only racist when white people do it?

    • a d says:

      03:48pm | 07/06/10

      idris elba, black british actor cast to play white norse god in thor. http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2010/apr/27/idris-elba-thor-race-debate there’s been outcry.  it’s just the way things are, they cast the actor they want for the role.
      (Axel Foley was original beefy white guy until they cast Eddie Murphy in Beverly Hills Cop)
      Russell Crowe was an English-accented Spaniard in Gladiator and Linda Hunt played a man in the Year of Living Dangerously.

    • Brad Coward says:

      04:18pm | 07/06/10

      Honestly, how does Sara fill in her day on the odd occasion where someone of something isn’t offending her sensibilities ?

      Sara…you’re complaining about a movie….about a video game ! 

      I’m sure that had the producers known that you would be personally offended all care would have been made to cast an Iranian actor in the role of the Persian Prince.  Take note, movie producers….always reference Sara Haghdoosti before letting the camera roll, next time !

      In the meantime, when you have $100 million to make a film….do it however you want.  Just don’t offend anyone.

    • Leonidas says:

      04:40pm | 07/06/10

      pshttt next you’d want spartans to play spartans =_=

    • Bob says:

      04:42pm | 07/06/10

      In summary, no one really cares.

    • Mark says:

      04:46pm | 07/06/10

      After Sara’s last rant about how Muslim women voluntarily cover their faces and that we Westerners have it all wrong (remember, they are not forced to), I would have thought her follow-up blog would have dealt with the five Al Jazeera news anchors who quit because they were being FORCED into a more conservative dress code they disagreed with. But no, that would force her to deal with facts rather than just her off the cuff opinions on how the West just has it all wrong. Well done Sara, you are proving that it is you who should open her eyes up a little more.

    • 6c legs says:

      09:41pm | 07/06/10

      Whoa there “Mark”... you made a post criticising Al Jazeera, and it got published?!
      ...someone please pass me the smelling salts…

      Seems to moi (via my journeys right across the net; from US equestrian boards where there’s no topic that hasn’t been broached, to current affairs/political/science boards here and abroad) that this latest generation of adults uses forms of Entertainment Media to shape their “moral compass” in a way that is completely foreign to anyone over 35yrs of age.
      And if that’s really what they’re doing ?, then the West is in some seriously deep do-doo.

    • Ando says:

      04:58pm | 07/06/10

      The game was developed by Americans, you know? It had nigh ZERO reference to anything Persian in it. It was Mario Brothers with guys in turbans substituting for Koopa Troopers.

      I guess it’s their fault too.

      You’re making a very, very, loose correlation in this article, Sara. You may have a point about passive racism through reinforcing negative stereotypes in the media, but using Prince of P as your point-in-case is farcical.

    • Bitten says:

      05:15pm | 07/06/10

      Jake should have stayed way out from this movie, not only to avoid treading on the sensitivities of the Iranian people, but also to avoid making a sh*t movie. It’s bad Jake buddy. Stick to good jam like Brothers - heavy sh*t but good.

      On a similar note to today’s article, I’m annoyed that Kung Fu Panda wasn’t played by an actual panda - it was Jack Black’s voice, folks! I feel ripped off.

    • Rob says:

      05:22pm | 07/06/10

      OK, you just cant win can you? First, Iran (modern day Persia) goes ballistic after the release of the movie ‘300’ because it showed Persians as a barbaric enemy. Now, you have a movie about a Persian HERO and you still cant be happy?!?!? I didn’t see too many Scots get angry that Mel Gibson portrayed William Wallace, or Liam Neeson portray Rob Roy. How about Mick Jagger acting as Ned Kelly? Calm down…IT’S A MOVIE!!!!

    • Roy says:

      06:26pm | 07/06/10

      Huge double standard here. Historical TV dramas regularly show non-white actors in white roles, such as in portrayals of Robin Hood (black Friar Tuck), King Arthur (Guinevere) and Oliver Twist (Nancy). When anyone complains they’re criticized as racist and advised to ‘look beyond race’. Deluded white liberals actually pretend they don’t even notice the character’s ethnicity. There are now calls for a black James Bond and Spiderman, while Halle Berry already played Catwoman.

      TV dramas almost always show white males as evil and arrogant while films like The Matrix and Avatar overwhelmingly show white people as the bad guys, while The Lord Of The Rings was criticized for being too white, despite it being based on Nordic mythology.

      Sure, make your own movie. But make it yourselves, and while you’re at it don’t have the actors speaking in English.

    • Bob says:

      06:39pm | 07/06/10

      As others have said, Sara, if you invest yourself emotionally in a video game, and get so upset when it doesn’t turn out exactly the way you wanted, I think you shouldn’t why no-one here is taking you seriously. It’s a very childish way to think and backs up the view of many Australians that ethnic ‘culture’ is little more than MTV, KFC and saving up to buy gold bangles.

      Secondly, you are beginning to sound like those whining African-Americans who seem to think that even the most insignificant point is somehow racist (for example, one even argued that the gremlins in the movie of the same name were modelled on African-Americans). You don’t do yourself or your people any favours by complaining about petty issues like this.

      I feel sorry for the many Iranians right now who I’m sure are cringing at your bizarre comments.

    • Beka says:

      06:41pm | 07/06/10

      Oh please. What happened to the idea that the best person for the job should have it? For all we know they auditioned hundreds of Iranians.  Saying that only an Iranian should play a character in a movie based on a video game (ie completely removed from reality or history) is paramount to saying that only white people can play James Bond or Batman, for example.

    • Mel says:

      08:02pm | 07/06/10

      The author makes a good point. Hollywood likes to pat itself on the back about how liberal and progressive they are but when it comes to the crunch they’re as conservative as they come. I suppose it all boils down to dollars and cents, although they like to pretend that they’re ‘artists’. Bullshite artists maybe.

    • Adam Mitchell says:

      08:30pm | 07/06/10

      Oh please. I’m sure a movie called “The Prince of Iran” with a no-name Iranian cast would do absolute wonders for the world film industry. You should be happy anyone is even mentioning Persia/Iran without the words “nuclear” or “war-torn” in the same sentence.

    • Rachel says:

      03:22am | 08/06/10

      So equality in Hollywood casting is too much to ask for then? Good to know.

    • James1 says:

      11:22am | 08/06/10

      The fact that you think Iran is war torn just shows how little you know of international affairs.

    • Don DJ says:

      08:34pm | 07/06/10

      My favourite game as well.  They could have done so much with this movie but the moment they cast Jake… I didn’t need to know more… not interested in watching.

    • Paul says:

      08:51pm | 07/06/10

      you are delusional,  maybe if you stopped looking at things to be outraged by you may have enjoyed the movie.  Get a clue

    • Mary says:

      10:11pm | 07/06/10

      it would be nice if an asian could play a white character.  I think this is what this article is all about - it’s ok for white people to play any character of any ethnicity, but how about the reverse?  how would it make australians feel if a person of asian descent played ned kelly?  pretty outraged i’ll bet especially because he is an Australian icon.  They would be outraged because it is an inaccurate portrayal.  Ok so ned kelly is real and the Prince of Persia is fiction, but the Prince was a Persian icon in this writer’s eyes.  Of course she should be outraged that the directors didn’t even bother to cast someone who looked the part.  The arguments that directors are entitled to make as much money from movies by casting white actors do little to add to this debate.  Sure they are entitled, but is it right to allow this continued white supremacy in acting?  When Robert Downey Jr played a black man in Tropic Thunder there was similar outrage - it took people back to the days of segregation, where white people rubbed black paint on their faces to depict dark-skinned people.  The same is occurring here people - other ethnicities are being given the raw end of the stick.

    • WombatQueen says:

      11:38am | 12/06/10

      Hear, hear. I’d like it if they cast a black person to play a famous white character like Spiderman, or to play a famous white historical figure. The same people deriding this debate as being a PC-whinge would be up in arms at it being political-correctness-gone-mad. Because apparently ‘white’ is a neutral ethnicity whereas anything else is a gross rewriting of history and popular culture.

    • are you fair dinkum? says:

      02:07pm | 13/06/10

      If her idea of a persian icon who she can culturally connect with is a pixellated fantasy character designed by americans then id say she needs to get out more.

    • Jack says:

      10:12pm | 07/06/10

      after reading a bunch of these comments I have released that most of you seem to have no understanding of 1) the point Sara is ACTUALLY making and 2) racism.

      Firstly Sara ia simply trying to point out the effects that mass media has on us and our children and how we need to be thinking consumers. She is simply saying that, st the movies, there are heaps of positive white role models for us and children to be looking towards but a lack of positive Iranian/persian role models. Of course this is related to the fact that hollywood, who has a hegemonic dominance of the movie industry, makes films dominated by white people, white culture and white storylines. So given that, wouldn’t it be great that when a film has an oppurtunity to broadend out its racial casting and go beyound white casting, why not do just that. And I think she makes this point well and that when a film in fact doesn’t do this we should question why.

      Thanks for your time in puting this article together Sara, I look forward to following up on your included links and I wish you all the best in writing for the punch and dealing with all these close minded indivduals, who have never questioned much in their life.

    • Eligius says:

      11:34pm | 07/06/10

      Well, I’m half-Greek and constantly told I don’t look Greek, even though I have dark hair and dark eyes. (Apparently my Irish great-grandfather wiped out the Greek DNA.) Personally, I love it when I see non-Greek actors playing Greek characters in movies. (No-one in ‘Clash of the Titans’ looks Greek!) Maybe it will send a message that you can be Greek Othodox, and not look Greek.
      If Jake Gyllenhaal is half-Jewish, then surely he is close biologically to Persian? Anyway, aren’t the Persians Indo-European?  That means virtually any actor of European background, even English or Swedish, could play a role in this film.

    • Jessie says:

      11:54pm | 07/06/10

      I’m not Persian and when I heard Jake was being cast I felt seething hatred boiling in my gut. I am just so sick of whitey being cast to fill any cultural void . . . then let’s slap some stupid British accents on top of it. Didn’t you know that many years ago people in the middle eat were white and cockney? Ugh.

      Same problem with a lot of films, it’s stupid. I hate it and I’m white raspberry

    • Greg says:

      03:09am | 08/06/10

      Me and my mates went to see this movie and that was ones comment after the movie.  all the lead roles where played by ‘white’ actors lol.
      I think the actors where picked more for their pulling power rather than their actual background.  After all the movie producers are in it to make money when they produce the movie so they have to pick actors that are known and recognised to get audiences into the cinema.  This movie has been a victim of hollywood and Disney when all is said and done.

    • NESLIHAN KUROSAWA says:

      09:07am | 08/06/10

      Hi Sara,
      You are straight to the point that what most people actually know about the very rich culture of the Persian Empire anyway? Some of my ancestors lived on that land called Persia for centuriries.  And I did send you an email thanking you and your contributions to the general public opinion especially, living in the West.  The Persia that I know was a totally different and modern society and it used to make headlines during the regime the Shah Pehlevi and his lovely wife and family. Unfortunately, may be because of old ideals are dead, I am totally disappointed to say the least, that the Hollywood and other film makers are not as determined as they were before, no offence. I know for a fact that to make a great film requires a very big budget and also audience to actually make an effort to go and see it for themselves. I do miss “the good old days” where you would sit in an open air cinemas and you could not take your eyes off the screen.  If we look around our world is an amazing place and lets stay away from preconceived ideas and assumptions. Thanks once again, for a great topic. And the very best regards to your editors.

    • Sussan Khadem says:

      10:46am | 08/06/10

      I’m an Iranian Australian feminist too and I feel very proud of Sara Haghdoosti for writing this article and pointing out these injustices. Like Dan who commented earlier on I agree that Sara should be able to write about whatever she wants to write about. We are more than just the colour of our skins or the cultural background we are from. Positive role models, like the ones Sara suggested, would help this be realised.

    • Alice says:

      06:39pm | 08/06/10

      Oh please,

      Most movie and TV stars are Jewish, and I know very few people, none in fact that has been inspired to be circumcised.

      Now for some fun facts to diffuse the blame the white guy nonsense.

      Persians are Aryans.

      So are Indians.

      So are the Europeans.

      Chinese are not Aryans, nor are the Japanese, yet, for millennia all of the above groups has had a tradition of skin whitening amongst the upper and fashionable classes.

      In the main the tradition arose from the elite in every society seeking to distance itself from the lower orders. In the past the lower orders where invariably sunburn from slaving in the fields.

      The aristocracy therefore deemed that it had to be the opposite and therefore white, or at least whiter. Later the process reversed when the workers slaved in factories and became pale and the rich could afford holidays in the sun.

      Currently in Australia the desperately fashionable are in a lather about distancing themselves as much as possible from ‘Bogans’ and ‘McMansions’.. This means, living in the inner city, driving an approved car and being a card carrying uncritical member of the Religion of Political Correctness.

    • madb8d-stuff says:

      07:49pm | 08/06/10

      The same arguments: “it’s only a movie”, then the other excuses come out. Kingpin was Black, Agent Zero was asian. They miss the point that both characters were secondary to the story. Wolverine would not be cast with an asian american or Daredevil with a black actor.

      Now the new one that Prince of PErsia is not really based on Ancient Persia, so all the people must be white, rather than brown. Perhaps, they should have chosen Rathbone with his TAN? Seems to have worked in Last Airbender. No one could tell the difference between, Rathbone, Peltz and all those Inuit extras in the background.

    • Jerome says:

      02:33pm | 09/06/10

      I wonder how many how many of the “it’s just a movie” or “go make your own movie LOL” are white suburban hipsters.  Probably a lot.

    • Matt says:

      06:22pm | 11/06/10

      I couldn’t agree more. And what was with his accent. Stupid Hollywood.  Plus I was looking forward to seeing a real life version of Farah and what did we get? a ginger English girl with a spray tan (with the wrong name.)
      If I was you I’d be *pissed.* I’m annoyed at it and I’m white.

    • Anthony says:

      06:26pm | 11/06/10

      Oh just enjoy it for what it is. It’s just a movie.

    • John Dark says:

      06:28pm | 11/06/10

      Yes, yes, and Germans should be insulted by being played by Brits with evil accents for years. Robert Downey Jr played an “Aussie” in hilarious fashion in “Tropic Thunder”. It’s movies - get over it. If you want to feel closer to your heritage, read anything about Persia vs Everyone from historical texts.
      Next thing you’ll want only people of a certain heritage to play a character of a certain heritage. How many Iranian actors can carry a blockbuster film?

    • White but never better than anyone. says:

      06:43pm | 11/06/10

      Thank you Sara for putting forward your opinion on this.I may be white and of english german heritage but these hypocrisies also bother me at times.I’m sure there are occasions where it is ok to cast movies racially inaccurately but it should never be the norm.If the actor is respectful and does a good job then the cringe factor goes down.

      One casting has always bothered me, Sean Penn as a retarded man in I Am Sam.And he won an oscar for it, ridiculous.In this day and age arent we advanced enough to accept an actual retarded person in an acting role?Yes i loved Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man too, but how hard is it for an actor to act that way really?

      Matt Frewer in Eureka as an australian, well his accent doesnt cut it even nearly.But i’m not too bothered about it really as it doesnt detract much from the show.

      I find it strange that darker skinned people want to be whiter.Growing up around white people they all wanted to be tanned and darker.I guess people will always want to be something that they arent.Anyway i’ve always been a fan of shows like Star trek and Lost, with their multicultural casts.

    • Tim says:

      07:01pm | 11/06/10

      Jake G looked Persian enough for me. I really can’t see why its a surprise that when $200m is invested in a film, that they would want a name actor to help recoup their money and beyond. An unknown Iranian actor (and lets be honest, Iranians are hardly popular at the moment so that wouldn’t help) would probably do as good a job, but we are not doing a Year 12 drama play here are we. Its a business.

    • Manoj says:

      07:43pm | 11/06/10

      Thank you for writing this. I’m willing to bet 90% of people who don’t get the big deal about this are white and haven’t had to suffer negative ethnic stereotyping of any sort. (Altho some of you will come back with an anecdote rather quickly). Over years, we been brain-washed into thinking ” white is right’  - indians wanna use ‘skin-lightening creams, (which disgusts me), repeated potrayals of my kin as either terrorists or ugly, classless pushovers(too many movies to mention).
      Sure, its no big deal…to you,but my 4 year old says he ‘hates’ the Sudanese kid next door coz he’s “black and ugly” (hes actually a sweet cute looking kid) and wishes he wasn’t indian coz transformers had some indian mockery, its a big deal. I’m sure Asian kids watching “The last Airbender” movie whitewash feel similarly heartbroken. Moral: non-white kids need heroes, roles models and their own cultural concept of beauty too.

    • DOS says:

      07:56pm | 11/06/10

      You loved the game, and you’re upset about the movie not portraying a real “Iranian/Persian”...

      It’s based on a game from 1989 (first one), and in the original game, the Prince had blonde hair, are you complaining about that as well?

      Are people seriously this uptight these days?  This article started off talking about a movie based on a computer game, and flew off into a tangent about racism and body image, this is so stupid! LIGHTEN UP PEOPLE!!!!!!!!! You only live once!

    • Frustrated Fan says:

      08:11pm | 11/06/10

      I’m all with you. There are many great Iranian actors out there who could have easily worked this role. Not that I’m dissing Jake G here, I’m sure he’s lovely but couple that with Perseus in ‘Clash of the Titans’ being Aussie with one of the worst accents I’ve ever heard in a movie, worse than Russell as the ‘Gladiator’ (playing a spaniard WTF?) and ‘The Last Airbender’ being a total Whitewash of everything that was good with the animation. Hell ‘Percy Jackson’ the book series and consequent film adaptation practically claimed all of Greek mythology for the Americans!
      Largely I just think the film industry just doesn’t care. They don’t care what they might possibly be doing to the youth of today nor the true fans of what they are planning to massacre on the screen be it video game, animation or myth.

    • Destry says:

      08:43pm | 11/06/10

      If Iranians want a movie with Iranians in the leading roles, let them make the films and pay for them.  What’s the problem here?

    • Cly says:

      09:21pm | 11/06/10

      Boohoo. How many Robin Hood’s spoke with a British accent?

    • Frustrated Fan says:

      02:05pm | 12/06/10

      two words: Cary Elwes - Robin Hood: Men in Tights

    • Aussie actor says:

      11:01pm | 11/06/10

      No disrespect to anyone here, but if Jake is being paid to play a role that some people think is offensive, then great for him I say!

      As an Australian actor of Chinese descent, if Hollywood paid me big bucks to play Bruce Wayne or Peter Parker, I’d say ‘hell yeah!’ and do it, despite the millions of Batman and Spiderman fans wanting to kill me for doing it… Although I suspect noone is going to cast me as John Mclean in Diehard…

      If they think it’ll work, and people will pay millions (collectively) to see it, then well done I say.

      I’m limited to ‘ethnic’ roles so I’d jump at the chance to play ‘someone else’...

      The Middle-eastern/Arab/etc actors in H-wood films that are cast as terrorists etc, if they had an issue as being stereotyped as forever the bad guy, they’d probably wouldn’t take the role… so perhaps not all ‘Persian’ people have an issue with Jake playing to role.

      And by the way, some posters shouldn’t get nationality and ethnicity mixed up… my nationality is Australia - and proud, but my ethnicity is Chinese.

    • JT says:

      08:49am | 12/06/10

      Interesting points Aussie Actor. Did you get an audition of the biopic on Chinese Australian Sniper Billy Sing? I only ask that because the production team said there were not any good Chinese Australian actors to play either Billy Sing or his father…

    • Aussie Actor says:

      12:11am | 13/06/10

      JT: No I wasn’t informed of the auditions. I think Billy Sing’s father was Chinese and mother was English… so I probably don’t look the part… although the actors they chose apparently don’t fit either…

      Still, I’d take any opportunity to play any part anyone is willing to pay me for, if I like the role that is… Perhaps I could be the next Batman… Bruce Wang… hehe

    • Dan says:

      07:23am | 12/06/10

      100% ethnic Persians are WHITE. I can’t believe you don’t know this.

    • Jo says:

      12:51pm | 12/06/10

      That’s exactly what I was going to post. How do you whitewash a Persian? They are already white!

    • Tom T. says:

      09:33am | 12/06/10

      It’s interesting that most people against this article succumbs to what’s wrong with our society…the “laid back, if it doesn’t concern me, then it’s just people whinging” type of mentality.  If the topic raised here doesn’t concern you, then no one is forcing you to read this article, but obviously it is an issue that many others find important.  For some to go as far as to say that the author shouldn’t have used this outlet to express such views is just ridiculous.  No one’s blaming JG for accepting the role, the problem lies with the movie studios.

      I applaud the author of this article for raising the point.  Excuses like “it’s just a movie, it’s just a videogame” is just that, an excuse.  Finding a counter-example of Americans playing Italian/British roles means nothing.  First of all, nationality does not equal ethnicity.  Second of all, two wrongs do not make a right.

      As a previous poster had mentioned, I’m sure the discussion would be very different here in Australia if Denzel were to be casted to play in Passion of the Christ…“it’s just a movie” afterall no?

    • Bjay says:

      10:37am | 12/06/10

      Interesting article and certainly made me think about things from a different perspective. I grew up playing Prince of Persia too but movies based on video games are hardly worth much thought - i didn’t notice the inaccuracies of the Tomb Raider/Resident Evil or MK movies all of which i enjoyed playing as a kid. Personally id rather not walk in to watch a movie and go ‘that guys persian’ ‘that girls chinese’ - the world will probably be better off when we stop noticing which race a person belongs to.

    • Robert says:

      12:03pm | 12/06/10

      Sweetheart get over yourself, it’s a movie.

    • verticalsmurf says:

      12:25pm | 12/06/10

      So you feel a close link to a computer game you played when you were a kid and you are upset that an Iranian didn’t have the lead role. How many Iranians do you know who wear MC Hammer pants and Fez hats that never fall off, and who search through torch lit caverns fighting ghosts and evil characters chasing fortunes with three lives to spare?
      Come on, it’s a movie, it’s hollywood. You didn’t hear us harp on when Glenn Close started screaming that a dingo ate her baby.

    • Andrew says:

      01:04pm | 12/06/10

      I saw this film and absolutely loved it. Now if this was an Iranian production, there is no way on earth I would have watched it. Let America and who ever make there films and Iran make there own.
      As it was stated earlier movies are also about making money. Having a well known actor can do that.

    • Phil says:

      01:37pm | 12/06/10

      Wow. When did it become bad to be white? I thought we were finally getting past all this. I can’t believe people are still judging based on their skin, rather than their idiotic and ill-advised actions.

    • true brooty says:

      01:51pm | 12/06/10

      I thought ethnic Persians were Anciet Aryans ie “white” ?

      Many of the high rollers in movies & tv in the U.S are Jewish so it stands to reason theywill ot churning out “arabic heroes” anytime soon.Last thing on Earth they would want is people to empathise with Arabs.

    • Quentin George says:

      02:56pm | 12/06/10

      Film makers cast actors their audiences want to see. It’s just as stupid to complain about the Scando-Jewish Gyllenhall playing a Persian as it would be to complain that Youssef Chahine directed his film on Saladin and had Richard the Lionheart played by an Arab in a really bad blonde wig.

      I look forward to this writer’s next article - possibly on the inherent racism involved in the Canadians baking up a pastry dish and calling it Persian.

    • Banksia-Aus says:

      03:22pm | 12/06/10

      No, I’m not buying it.  Sara the journalist makes, in her words ‘adult’ comments about childish video games, movies, racism & hollywood. 
      Reaction: hundreds of comments:
      Result: journalist gold.

    • Good article, but less sensationalism please says:

      04:26pm | 12/06/10

      Might have been better had you of said that Hollywood stole your identity. It was them, after all, who cast him in the role. As an actor, I don’t see why he should refuse a role. Heck, maybe he too enjoyed the game and saw it as a way of fulfilling that fantasy in his own way.

    • Mark says:

      05:39pm | 12/06/10

      Stop laying into this girl for having an opinion. Several reviewers have made the same observation and it is a valid point.
      Studios are not interested in cultural authenticity, they are interested in selling seats in a cinema. They will therefore use a known actor, to sell a lame movie. you gotta wonder about Jake as an action hero, but I digress.
      When cultural authenticity enhances the story they will go for people that look right. All of the extras looked right, because it would have looked ridiculous otherwise. The negro dude, was definitely authentic.
      Why put this girl down and attack her? Do you find people with alternative views threatening? I think thats called Fascism.

    • Matt says:

      08:26pm | 12/06/10

      Without the high-profile, highly skilled “american actor” these movies wouldn’t make any money. And without any money these movies wouldn’t be made in the first place. So until other countries come up to the same standard as Hollywood and produce big profit movies i don’t see how there can be so much criticism regards an “american” playing an iranian.
      Just enjoy the fact that you got to go down memory lane and remembered the times you use to sit on your computer hours on end playing Prince of Persia.

    • Michael says:

      10:03pm | 12/06/10

      You would think an iranian woman/jouranlist would have more important activist issues to concern herself with.

    • zoe says:

      10:53pm | 12/06/10

      I don’t know if anyone else addressed this but

      “Statistics of how many women use skin whiting treatments are incredibly hard to find, however a study published in the International Journal of dermatology had found that in Senegal 36% of women had used skin whiting products at one time, and that 75% of those women had suffered adverse effects as a result of continuous use.”.

      How many whities are dying of skin cancer because of trying to get a tan?  Increased rise in tanning salons hello, us whities are all trying to get brown, none of us are happy in our own skin, get over yourself.

    • Seth Drake says:

      02:13am | 13/06/10

      I wish people would live their lives without worrying about what they construe as a racial slight. I for one don’t care what race the cast are. They’re actors. Build a bridge, get over it. If you are that insecure maybe you have more issues to worry about than a movie.

    • Jonny says:

      12:27pm | 13/06/10

      Its based off the most recent games, not the old old old one.
      The newest editions cast a caucasion prince…

      so quit yer bitching

    • Andre says:

      02:09pm | 13/06/10

      Imagine if Crocodile Dundee was played by an American, like George Clooney for example… there would be an uproar. The negative commenters here need to open their eyes a little more and realise that just because something doesn’t offend you, doesn’t mean it’s not necessarily offensive to someone else. The dismissive ‘get over it’ attitude is easy to say when your the dominant culture.

    • RichardAK says:

      02:16am | 23/06/10

      The ancient Persian empire was a polyglot empire in which numerous ancestors of Jake Gyllenhaal—who is of partial Middle Eastern descent—lived.  Since his character is a street urchin who is adopted into the royal family, there is no reason to suppose that his character should be ethnic Persian.

 

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Some cricket relief during a political rain delay

What has become increasingly clear from the dithering statements from the three independents is they…

Trivial independents miss chance at making history

Trivial independents miss chance at making history

A hung parliament is a golden opportunity for serious reform. The independents should not waste their…

Body image crusaders must avoid normalising obesity

Body image crusaders must avoid normalising obesity

The Melbourne Spring Fashion Festival is now in full swing.  In a few days it will coincide with…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Trivial independents miss chance at making history

Tarzan says:

I have every confidence these 3 guys will make the right decision. In fact the scrutiny they have put the parties through nobody else could have done. And it made some interesting exposures, enough to change my mind who is the best of the worst. In my mind they are the 3 Wise Men. Just one other thing,… [read more]

From: How an 80’s look can suck the youth out of anyone

Pete says:

Last week a saw a girl with massive white "sea shell" earings (likely to be plastic clip-ons) wearing a shiny black dress (likely polyester) with high, ruffly shoulders! I couldn't work out if they just filming a movie or if she actually knew what she was wearing? I've seen a few other examples, and… [read more]

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Lucy Kippist

Are you a fan of 1980's fashion? @alex_carlton thinks it makes everyone look middle aged: http://bit.ly/dvvBqH#thepunch

Leo Shanahan

@arisharp have you a night there? You should to the national park near there

Leo Shanahan

Something to do during a political rain delay http://tinyurl.com/2da2qu3

Leo Shanahan

This is hilarious via @simonkearneyhttp://tinyurl.com/35f8r3p

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Gillard and Abbott get a digital makeover

Gillard and Abbott get a digital makeover

Warning: this has nothing to do with politics. We thought we’d see how the Prime Minister and Opposition… Read more

26 comments

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter