It’s been a big week this week for the politically correct.

Cartoon: Mark Knight

Tracey Spicer is worried her children are being indoctrinated into Christianity at school.

Some Coalition backbenchers are worried they can’t indoctrinate new citizens to Christianity.

And then there are the sheep which have been feeling all sorts of things because the minority group of ‘black sheep’ has been singled out in the following:

Baa baa black sheep
Have you any wool?
Yes sir! Yes sir!
Three bags full!
One for the master
One for the dame
And one for the little boy who lives down the lane.

What’s wrong with this nursery rhyme? Well if the politically correct would have their way, we will be singing ‘Baa baa rainbow sheep’ to account for the many different skin colour types of sheep we have in our world.

To date, I have only ever seen dirty grey sheep and black sheep, and apart from Mem Fox’s green sheep, I am not aware of any other coloured sheep. Nonetheless, we must recognise the rainbow sheep.

But the failure to address the other exclusionary language in this rhyme is systematic of the myopia that has been created by single-issue policy teams.

Or put more simply: one trick ponies.

Let’s start with the distribution of wealth. Who gets the wool? While I’m happy for the master to get the bag as he owns the sheep, and happy for the dame to get a bag as she’s probably part owner of the same sheep, I’m less happy that there’s an ambit individual who on residential status alone gets the third bag.

Who is this child and why does he get this wool? What criteria did he fulfil to get this wool? What are his family’s assets and income? Were these tested? And was there some sort of citizenship requirement? (Did he get a Bible or Koran?)

Now about the use of the incorrect measurement of ‘bag’ rather than ‘bale’; I get narky about people using imperial measurement over metric. I have to insist that the ‘bag’ of wool be changed to a ‘bale’ as per the standard unit of wool.

Clearly there are no ‘masters’ and ‘dames’ anymore. The Labor Government saw to that in the late 1980s. We should address these people more correctly and with more of an Australian sense of egalitarianism.

We are also compelled to address the issue of same-sex couples. While same-sex marriage is not legal in Australia, under tax rules same-sex couples are recognised as ‘spouses’.

And what have the feminists done about getting the little GIRL down the lane a bag of wool? If pay parity between men and women is such an important issue in women’s rights land, why has the distribution of the third unit of wool not been split in half?

Just in: the Angora Goats Growers Association has protested that the lack of representation of goats in this nursery rhyme has built an unfair prejudice against Angora goat wool. They are seeking their goats’ inclusion in this nursery rhyme.

(By including the goats we may have opened up a new issue with the goose down industry, who have always felt uncomfortable about the death of the old grey goose for Great Aunt Rudvee’s bed. But, as the issue of bedding isn’t in play here, we will get to that another day.)

So, in the interests of fairness, equity, pay parity and inclusion, Baa Baa Black Sheep will now be sung as follows:

Baa Baa rainbow sheep and angora goat
Have you any wool?
Yes sir/madam, yes sir/madam
Three bales of them
One for the man in charge and owner of the livestock
And one for the person who is his spouse (for tax reasons) and half owner
And one half each for the little boy and girl who reside in the area and are eligible under the criteria (available from the website).

102 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • TChong says:

      05:00am | 04/03/11

      Morrison and the bibles - is there no end to this blokes stupidity ?

    • Brutus Balan says:

      08:51am | 04/03/11

      The Answer:  As much as there is no end to your leftist stupidity that you spill here regularly, TChong.

    • Rev says:

      10:02am | 04/03/11

      It’s about as bright as an unmarried atheist being opposed to gay marriage…

    • hot tub political machine says:

      10:38am | 04/03/11

      Morrison could do with having a read of his. Something in there along the lines of “I was a stanger and you let me in”

    • Peter Simmons says:

      03:20pm | 04/03/11

      Yes You

    • jgm says:

      05:24pm | 04/03/11

      FFS chongie, do you have to comment upon everything? And find an anti conservative comment in everything?

      Give it a rest, you sound like an idiot with your incessant rubbishing of everything not ALP.

    • Tedd says:

      05:42am | 04/03/11

      Maaaaaaaaaa(d) is what goats say.

      “PC gone maaaaad” - yep, Scott’s a goat.

      Dirty grey sheep, Julia?  Ya gotta get your hands on one with a long fleece, and part that fleece - beautiful colour, beautiful crimp pattern.  One of the wonders of the real natural world.

      Terrific what one can find below the surface. 

      Pity we can see Scotty’s pronouncements are just bald assertions.

    • LauraBoBaura says:

      10:47am | 04/03/11

      Not pulling the wool over your eyes is he Tedd? wink

    • Tedd says:

      11:38am | 04/03/11

      No, not now he is just a one trick pony.

      I don’t ‘live down the lane’ that Scotty would visit, nor would I be “eligible under the criteria” he would set.

    • Robert Smissen, rural SA, God's own country says:

      02:28pm | 05/03/11

      Didn’t Dr. Suess Have blue sheep? ? ?

    • Macca says:

      06:39am | 04/03/11

      next they’ll all be asking us to wear pants in the street!

    • acotrel says:

      06:42am | 04/03/11

      You mentioned ‘feminists’.  Erick will be right with you on that!

    • kyra says:

      09:30am | 04/03/11

      I’m more concerned about the fact the rhyme features a talking sheep? A sheep certainly wouldn’t be able to talk and why are we asking the sheep who it is distributing it’s wool to anyway? Shouldn’t we be asking the livestock owner? We are providing our children with unrealistic expectation as to what sheep are capable of.
      By the way, I’ve heard the Rainbow Sheep argument before, It’s not a new argument.

    • Gregg says:

      11:35am | 04/03/11

      It might not just be ” a ” talking sheep kyra for if it is being addressed as ” Baa Baa ” the one doing the Baaing might well be a sheep too.

      Maybe we’re missing the whole context of this nursery rhyme and others and that it might just be teaching the little ones that all our friends that cannot walk on two legs as well as the ones that can all have a heart, mind and soul and do communicate with oneanother and some even with us, examples being
      The pup/doggie who’ll come up alongside your bed with a wake up hello or who will let you know he/she is back inside after being let out for a night pee.
      And then we often have the birds in harmony or not in the bush.
      Even a Kangaroo who’ll eat a bit of good multigrain bread but knock back some floppy Mountain bread wrap.

      And let’s not forget Babe.

      With Baa Baa and the Baaer it could be one of the majority white or muddy grey sheep just acknowledging one of the minority.

    • Liz says:

      06:46am | 04/03/11

      Onya!!Take a stand someone needs to.

    • Heather Rowledge says:

      06:51am | 04/03/11

      ... and I thought rainbow people were proudly gay - or has this PC issue got confused with gay marriage? Or am I wrong to question the sexual preferences of the sheep?

    • Chris L says:

      08:01am | 04/03/11

      That’s what I was wondering. Gay sheep are not unheard of and I guess they might need some sort of representation.

    • hot tub political machine says:

      10:39am | 04/03/11

      Never met a gay sheep, seen some bi-sexual ones though

    • Nigel says:

      06:58am | 04/03/11

      The lad down the lane must be a reference to the lower income who will reap a bale of wool because the master’s sheep produced too much emissions and was taxed an extra third of his income to a SFTS. (Sheep farting trading scheme)
      As for PC. This is actually an impingement on our civil rights to be able to speak freely! Some people need to harded the @#$% up and grow some thicker skin.

    • stephen says:

      10:25am | 04/03/11

      That reminds me.. There’s a bloke called Professor Garlick, (read it yesterday) who is doing research on kangaroo farts…
      “hey mate, was that you !”
      “Nah, and i don’t talk to kangaroos.”

    • Samuel says:

      07:02am | 04/03/11

      A point well made.

    • Mahhrat says:

      07:03am | 04/03/11

      Okay, here’s what is wrong with society today: We’ve all turned off.

      Sure, we all watch TV or Internets or whatever, and we all read “the news” but we’re disconnected from it, because none of it happens next door.  And even if it does, most of us will move away, unless we’re too poor, in which case we’ll probably become the news sooner or later.

      We listen to music wherever we travel, we never say hi to the guy or girl standing next to us on the plane.  We only really interact on the internet, where we’re able to find people who we like - forums for Warhammer geeks, forums for gym junkes; hell, I see ads around for “EliteMeet”, some kind of dating site for people who believe bank balances are important relationship requirements.

      We just don’t need to worry about people we don’t like any more, we can tune them out.  And that’s the wedge for the PC brigade and those like them.

      Even as little as 30 years back, getting around was much harder than it is now, late trains notwithstanding.  Your social group lived on much the same block, or maybe the next suburb, so you made friends with who you had available.  That meant learning to live with little irritants like “Black Sheep”.

      Nobody does that now.  Shit, I’ve got friends in Scotland, the US, Sweden, four states of Australia, and I’m a homebody! 

      People, understand that there are things in this world that are going to piss you right off.  Then, get over yourselves, take a deep breath, and go on about your day.  It’s not up to you to tell everyone else how to live, mkay?

      (Yes, I know that comment’s hypocritical by definition, but you get the idea)

    • rufus says:

      10:04am | 04/03/11

      I can’t grasp your reasoning at all. We’ve become more insular and on the other hand we’re in touch with people through the world wide net, so that somehow means political correctness has grown?

      I think you need to try to reduce your point to a single sentence and see if it makes sense.

    • Beth says:

      10:41am | 04/03/11

      I agree with you.  People who communicate on the internet only or mostly, are those who cannot function normally in a real world, in a one on one or face to face situation.  They can only live in a fantasy world - that’s what it is!  - they can hide their true looks, feelings and character in this manner.

    • rufus says:

      11:05am | 04/03/11

      So do you include yourself in that ‘living in a fantasy world’ description, Beth, or are you the exception to your character assessment of people who communicate through the internet?

    • Shifter says:

      11:35am | 04/03/11

      See that’s the thing, in days of yore the ‘black sheep’ would be shunned from society for their unconventional ways. Now they just group up globally with other black sheep over various social networking sites and, presumably, have a jolly old time.

      Meanwhile the white sheep believed they were missing out, so they took it online too, and soon everyone was the same; a stranger in real life isolated in their own iPod bubble to afraid of a bad reaction to smile at or help another.

    • Bilby says:

      12:38pm | 04/03/11

      I’m sorry Shifter, but that is patently untrue. Don’t you know there are no black sheep on the internets?

    • Mahhrat says:

      01:02pm | 04/03/11

      You lack of ability to grasp is not my problem, Rufus.

      Shifter made an excellent summary though, you should review and try again.

      See, I live in Hobart, because people here are in a small enough town that everyone is only a couple degrees of separation from everyone else.  In Melbourne, that’s usually 6 or 7 steps.  It’s a massive difference.  Even talking to people in Melbourne can be confronting until I remember it’s simply a different culture.

    • Gina says:

      02:26pm | 04/03/11

      What’s wrong in society today is that sentence, this umbrella statement is never going to keep all societies problems dry. There are plenty of things wrong in today’s society, but what people forget is there were plenty of things wrong in yesteryears as well. That sentence is the equivalent of rose-colored time glasses.
      PC is the product of what was wrong back in the day. If we don’t call our coffee (or sheep) black, maybe people will forget slavery, if we refer to both sexes when addressing the unknown gender of our audience maybe people will forget that women have been overlooked for millennia. I know the purported purpose of PC is to correct these wrongs, but didn’t 1984 teach us anything, delete the word, and what is represented ceases to exist “if all records told the same tale-then the lie passed into history and became truth” (Book 1 Chapter 3). What’s wrong in today’s society is we are forgetting what went wrong before.

    • rufus says:

      03:15pm | 04/03/11

      If you think that’s a cogent comment, mahrat, please avoid the disappointment of trying a career as a writer. Shifter makes something approaching more sense out of it, but not much.

    • Wynston Cruso says:

      05:42pm | 04/03/11

      I don’t know what you’re talking about Mahhrat and Beth, I for one have no problem interacting with real people in the world…...

      ...of warcraft.

      I believe, if anything, my interactions with people on the interwebs has increased my interpersonal skills. And if you don’t believe me I’ll get my level 85 Orc Warrior to hit you for 25,000 hp.

    • Sodapoppy says:

      12:49pm | 02/04/11

      People, understand that there are things in this world that are going to piss you right off.  Then, get over yourselves, take a deep breath, and go on about your day.  It’s not up to you to tell everyone else how to live,okay?
      So who are these twisted people who think they can tell the next generation “We had a great life with every thing you could wish for, but you lot are going to ride bikes and eat in the dark because we say so” Bah, what intellectual bullshittery!

    • Ron says:

      07:06am | 04/03/11

      What about those disadvantaged people who do not have access to the website in the rhyme?  You should make the information available as an appendix to the nursery rhyme for those folk.

    • Wendy says:

      07:07am | 04/03/11

      Nursery rhymes are just that nursery rhymes. Why on earth would grown people worry about what’s in a nursery rhyme? Most of them have been around for a hundred years or more, so just leave them alone and for goodness sake let kids be kids they only get one childhood why do adults need to spoil it for them. Adults teach children prejudice, children are unaware until they are taught. If we didn’t teach our children prejudice the world would be a better place.

    • kerry says:

      12:49pm | 04/03/11

      Oops Wendy, your slip is showing.
      Nursery rhymes were/are political commentary and contain history lessons for all.
      See http://www.rhymes.org.uk/
      I find it strange that most people don’t know that. Stil, I agree that adults teach children prejudice - and that’s why I support PC - to make people think more critically of their received ideas, instead of just parrotting them as a matter of fact.

    • Sheldon says:

      07:10am | 04/03/11

      You cant call them rainbow sheep. You’ll ofend the gays.

    • Two Mummies says:

      08:09am | 04/03/11

      I’m gay and I’m not offended in the least.

    • Ryan says:

      09:07am | 04/03/11

      What about rainbows, rainbows have feelings too.

    • Geoff - Brisbane says:

      11:35am | 04/03/11

      @ Two Mummies

      Well thats just not right is it. According to the rules of PC (and those who follow them) you should be irate and ready for a middle east style government change over the use of “rainbow sheep”

    • Kiwi says:

      08:58am | 05/03/11

      Can I have the good lookin’ sheep?

    • pete says:

      07:35am | 04/03/11

      You forgot to give due credit to Alpaca’s and at the same time dismissing out of hand the effort of sheep raised for their meat thereby marginalising them.
      then you gave unrequired credit to the man who owned the livestock. That in actual fact would be the family trust set up by the man in a further tax minimisation strategy so that the man could be paid below minimum wages by the trust to minimise his personal income and assets.

    • Jim says:

      07:51am | 04/03/11

      Just goes to show that the loudest groups set the rules.

      When I was a kid the conservative old biddies had the voice…as a toddler I loved Romper Room (hey, Nickelodean wasn’t invented then), and the presenter back then was sacked for wearing a ‘revealing’ dress (revealing meaning it was slightly low cut), not on Romper Room, but on another late-night show!

      Fast forward to when my kids were that age - what dad didn’t enjoy watching Charlii or Kathleen bounce around on Hi-5??

      But by that stage the PC goons had the voice - “Noddy was feeling a little queer” ring a bell?

      The god-botherers still tried - SEX written in a dust cloud on the Lion King, Bert and Ernie being closet gays etc - but by then they had been relegated to the loony bin.

      One can only hope PC champions get relegated soon!

    • stevie p says:

      07:58am | 04/03/11

      Shit! Are you actually paid to write this?

    • grumpy says:

      12:35pm | 04/03/11

      lol Comment of the day. i thought i was the only one thinking it.

    • Todd says:

      01:46pm | 04/03/11

      Well that makes 3 of us!

    • Reg says:

      07:59am | 04/03/11

      On behalf of all sensitive sheep, I’d like to object to the marker block we rams have to wear to show everyone which ewe we’ve been screwing last night.

      Anyhow wasn’t that a spy rhyme intended to disclose where the ammunition was being stashed? If it’s not then the master was getting his share as well.

      A doco I watched last night about the British who used slaves and made their fortunes in the sugar industry, didn’t pull any punches about using the nigger word, and it’s an historic fact that should never be diluted.

    • RGG says:

      08:00am | 04/03/11

      I generally find that anyone who uses the phrase “political correctness gone mad” might as well say “I’m not racist but…” or “no offence but…”. Generally they are only ever complaining about the fact that their casual racism or prejudice is no longer openly accepted. See also: “unaustralian”, “vocal minority”.

    • Jim says:

      09:31am | 04/03/11

      I think it’s more a fact that any minority group with a chip on their shoulder has used the racism word so often that it has been watered down to the point where everythig has to be qualified first with a disclaimer.

      If the police describe a suspect as ‘being of middle eastern appearance’ he better be prepared for accusation of racism! It’s little wonder now that people have to say things like that when they want to speak their minds.

    • rufus says:

      10:06am | 04/03/11

      No, RGG is right. What ‘political correctness gone mad’ means is ‘I want to say whatever I like, no matter who it might offend’.

    • Markus says:

      11:23am | 04/03/11

      @rufus, last time I checked, the ‘right not to be offended’ was not covered under Australian Law.

    • LauraBoBaura says:

      11:44am | 04/03/11

      RGG & Rufus… are you both mad? Okay so you don’t have an issue with the following things being changed:

      Manhole - changed to personell access unit (so as to not offend us womenfolk, who would probably never want to go down a ‘personhole’ anyway)

      HO HO HO - changed in some shopping centres to HE HE HE so as not to offend prostitutes I guess.

      Blackboards to chalkboards.

      I struggle to think of anyone who is actually offended by any of these things…

    • fml says:

      12:25pm | 04/03/11

      The problem is RGG, the people whose the term “Political correctness gone mad” fail realise the thin line between personal freedoms. As a democratic citizen of a “free” nation who pays my taxes, i shouldnt have to hear derogatory comments directed towards anyone.

      I dont want to stop freedom of speech, i want people to realise the power of their freedom of thought. To use this freedom of thought to ask themselves, where does my personal freedom stop and where does anothers begin? These people never ask them selves this, its always ME ME ME, my freedom is more important.

      I dont want this tolerant country of ours to turn into the US, with crazies like the Westboro baptist church picketing the funerals of dead soldiers.
      Technically thats allowed under freedom of speech, so what our own crazies have to understand is, everytime they yell, “what about freedom of speech” or “Political correctness gone mad” they are encouraging others to say and do with out thinking. This would be a very bad outcome for a nation built on tolerance and intelligence.

    • pete says:

      01:16pm | 04/03/11

      Notice they still call them white boards, maybe we should call them a shade board that would cover both black and white, but then we would be in danger of marginalising the beige vote. however we could then adopt a policy that neither black or white could enter into a legal union with any beige entities and then move to block equal rights for anyone who resided in a territory even though we were not representatives of a territory but representatives of a state who already enjoyed more rights than territoreans, like torrens titles on land and the right to have laws passed by your assembly not to be interferred with because someone who didnt live there might get their nose out of joint

    • fml says:

      05:09pm | 04/03/11

      @pete,

      maybe you can call it a board. as in.
      Johnny can you please get up and write something on the board.

    • JIM says:

      08:01am | 04/03/11

      by using sir/madam are you implying a preference becasue sir appears first?

    • The Original Oz says:

      08:09am | 04/03/11

      Erick Where are youuuuuuuuuu - The word feminist was uttered and you have failed to comment. Any one seen EricK around, we seem to have lost him.

    • Helen says:

      08:24am | 04/03/11

      Oh HILARIOUS. Julia, if you get the urge to switch to a career as a standup comedian, just lie down until the feeling passes, OK?

      This pearl-clutching story about the Rainbow sheep has been circulating around the tabloids for at least a decade now, with desperate attempts at actual verification. (Along with the obligatory “Kindergarten Nativity Play Cancelled!111!!!!!1!” at Christmas.)  If you read the linked article, the ONE child care centre implicated in this STALINIST!! PLOT!!1!11! has a worker who sings the Rainbow version hence the kids, as the article describes, sing BOTH versions. OMG WE’RE DOOMED, DOOMED.

      What about reporting some news?

    • The anti-Helen says:

      10:07am | 04/03/11

      Wow, someone’s having a worse Friday than I am.

      I thought this was a funny enough read.

      If you want news reports I suggest you go to a news website. DUMBASS.

    • Gavin says:

      10:13am | 04/03/11

      Helen, if you want news, buy a friggin paper. This is an opinion piece which often features satire from writers on a freelance basis.

      And Helen, remember to hold down Shift when using a gross overabundance of exclaimation marks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Elphaba says:

      10:38am | 04/03/11

      Opinion blog, not news blog.  Nice one, Helen.

      Better go read the Daily Terror for a news fix, I think SMH might be waaaaaay over your head!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • AFR says:

      08:31am | 04/03/11

      This whole rainbow sheep malayky was a “story” about 15 years ago. I guess when you have run out of ideas. Recycle.

    • fairsfair says:

      10:36am | 04/03/11

      The Innisfail factor is what has brought it up again. It was in our local news about two days ago. It does take a while for things to make it all the way up here - like electricity, colour TV and hygiene.

      Meanwhile, it is Friday and I had a chuckle. I’ve heard the story before but I have never read a Politically Correct version.

      Shoot me, I thought it was funny.

    • AFR says:

      11:15am | 04/03/11

      Fair enuff, but when i first heard this one rearing it’s head again, I thought back to every Christmas where a school somewhere decides to not sing a particular Xmas carol, and everyone gets up in arms, marking the death of the Australian way of life. In fact, its a bogan favourite: http://thingsboganslike.com/2009/12/03/38-political-correctness-gone-mad/

    • fairsfair says:

      11:56am | 04/03/11

      crack up! I am going to have to get on that website more often smile

      Is that particular carol “six white boomers”?

      Now all I can think about is Love Actually - “there was a second lobster present at the birth of Jesus?” *eyeroll* “yes mum”.

    • malohi says:

      08:32am | 04/03/11

      PC gone mad, got it.
      I think someone said the poem originaly had racial undertones, I don’t really care it is all rediculous.
      More importantly, the article left me with one question… what is an angora goat?
      BRB
      Ahh i get it now, very clever, and the pics on google made me smile. Thankyou for your article.

    • Jade says:

      09:40am | 04/03/11

      It doesn’t have any racial undertones actually.  Its from when there was a tax imposed on wool many moons ago.

    • Cat says:

      08:34am | 04/03/11

      And you left out the alpacas.

      Which just goes to show that “political correctness” is utter nonsense that does more harm than good but it suits certain political agendas so we are likely to be stuck with it.

    • James says:

      08:53am | 04/03/11

      The boy who lives down the lane was a disproportionate beneficiary of wool-related disbursements due to the high socio-economic status of his parents allowing them to afford a house in a high-wool area.

      Henceforth, the distribution of all packaged wool products (PWPs) must take account of the level of deprivation of any given lane.

      The $4.2bn annual administraion cost of this social engineering will be paid for by a termless series of one-off annual levies (i.e. not a tax) applicable to all Australians (who have a postcode beginning with “2”).

    • rufus says:

      09:01am | 04/03/11

      Let’s hope the sheep, regardless of colour, was not subjected to mulesing, or PETA will be on the case, wheeling out naked models to protest.

    • Bilby says:

      09:59am | 04/03/11

      HEY! Lay off PETA! Who else is as good at getting hot celebs to get their gear off? Apparently they also have a message, but buggered if I know what it is.

    • Markus says:

      11:27am | 04/03/11

      I did love it when Pink (P!nk ?) got all high and mighty about mulesing on her tour to Aus, then changed tact after having mulesing, and the alternative (slow painful death by flystrike), explained to her.

    • LauraBoBaura says:

      11:52am | 04/03/11

      @Markus - there was also a good PETA moment, when Pam Anderson (PETA ambassador) was setting the ‘ugg boots with mini skirt’ horror trend… oh the outrage when she discovered she’d been walking around hollywood with dead sheep on her feet :D

    • stave says:

      09:04am | 04/03/11

      Point made.

      What about transgender?

      But a question about the Myschool web site when I visited what does the fact that there is 1% aboriginal student have to do with anything? I was really confused about why this is relevent?

      What are they suggesting ?

      Is this another example of inclusion and exclusion and PC gone bonkers?

    • Tim says:

      09:11am | 04/03/11

      Hehe, great piece! Loved it - cheers.

      (p.s. you should get them to update your bio. It says “A strong advocate of Western Australia’s succession…” I think it should be “secession”.)

    • Lee says:

      09:11am | 04/03/11

      There is another colour sheep. Those from the Gascoyne area with its rich red soil are a beautiful shade of red.

      Apart from that I agree. PC has gone mad!

    • hot tub political machine says:

      10:41am | 04/03/11

      Don’t mention Redskins…..they are bad for kids with braces

    • Bilby says:

      09:27am | 04/03/11

      As far as I know, the accepted conversion rate is 1 bale = 2.45634 bags full, although due to modern efficiencies brought about by the addition of women to the slave force, it may be up to 3 bales by now.

    • Peter says:

      09:41am | 04/03/11

      Why cant the people in the nursery rhyme have black wool, they wanted black wool, they have waited all year for sheep shearing. Are black wool sheep owners being penalised because black wool gets more money. Will all black sheep now be sent to the abattoirs for meat instead of wool production. All because the wool buyers can now only have rainbow wool without any black in it.

    • JK says:

      09:47am | 04/03/11

      Now as a straight white man who can not say anythign in life without offending someone and who rarely gets offended myself i must say that the term rainbow has been used in the past to denote a person of a homosexual nature. So by calling him a rainbow sheep are you now descriminating againest straight sheep sayign that only gay sheep produce good enough wool?

      See anyone can make anything into something bad if they want to or society to get jstu get over itself i for one prefer the latter option.

    • Kathy says:

      03:56pm | 04/03/11

      I agree JK , was wondering why it was OK to ignore the straight sheep.  And the bisexual & asexual ones for that matter.

    • The Old Salt says:

      09:48am | 04/03/11

      Well, buggar me! I’m certainly offended. I’m always being told I’m full of bull. So where’s the nursery rhyme about me? My ex spouse (the Old Cow) gets a mention in literature now and again . . .  Hey Diddle Diddle, and all that . . . but we manly bulls are treated with distain.  Okay, so I’m a caucasian, straight, christian bull, but is that any reason to discrimate against me? Or is it just that those sheep with questionable habits have poisioned everyone against me and my mates? Just because those emission-blowing ruminant mammals who often have to be separated from their friends the goats and have nice cuddly coats, why should they get all the publicity . . . inferring they are the saviours of bullkind. Sorry, I’m out of line here I know. I’m not allowed to criticise other species, am I? I’ve just got to be manly (or is that horney) and take everything thrown at me on the chin. Anyway, all these bleating sheep tell me I’m only good for one thing, and I hear they are even trying to take that away from me and make me completely superfluous. Think I’ll just head down to the bottom of the paddock to have a natter to my mate over the fence. He’s probably got some theory on why that spoilt little brat down the lane gets more attention, and gifts, than we do.

    • PTom says:

      09:56am | 04/03/11

      Julia,

      You got it wrong. The little boy down the is the shepard, not some welfare case.

    • Economist says:

      11:13am | 04/03/11

      Isn’t the sheep the working class? Saying yes sir yes sir. The little boy could be anyone except for the worker. It could be the little boy of the Master and Dame who lives in the same exclusive residential area, but just down the lane a little bit.? Or it could be a derogatory term for the government/Church/King.

      Either way Julia has it wrong.  Basically the worker gets screwed and should be thankful for the scraps of grass and weeds they get to live on. While the wool is taken off their backs by an elitist class who claim that any entitlement by the working class to a share of the wool is political correctness gone mad.

    • kerry says:

      12:23pm | 04/03/11

      As a self-proclaimed iconoclast, I’m surprised Julia Thornton does not know the origins of nursery rhymes - and the political/historical content therein. See http://www.rhymes.org.uk/

      As for political correctness, I’ll probably cop a belting for my views: I find people who attack PC as being intellectually lazy; they want to cling onto old beliefs and ideas rather than using a big of brain power to examine why these (invariably) received beliefs are still acceptable in an educated modern society.

    • Big Daddy D says:

      11:09am | 04/03/11

      Discrimination is for fools.  Unless you’re a fool, in which case, I apologise. (apologize |??päl??j?z|
      verb [ intrans. ]
      express regret for something that one has done wrong)

    • Zaf says:

      11:17am | 04/03/11

      I strongly feel that we should include some native animals (baa baa wombat, etc.)

      Also - sheep’s hooves are terrible for the soil (ditto goat’s hooves)...could you look into replacing both of these with a more environmentallly friendly (and economically for value adding, I might add) animal or animals - llamas, alpacas, etc.

      Scott Morrisson is still a ham head.

    • Traxster says:

      11:19am | 04/03/11

      Politcal correctness ??
      You wanna talk about pee cee ??............OK…...
      Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional minority which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

    • Mouse says:

      05:45pm | 04/03/11

      rflmao!  Very good!!

    • Gregg says:

      11:49am | 04/03/11

      Hey Julia,
      No White Sheep!
      You haven’t been to those shaky isles then where that Long White Cloud is washing so many of them on nice green pastures often enough that they’ll stand out like dogs balls.

      And come to think of it why shouldn’t dogs get a mention too for some of the shaggier ones as in coat and not that a lot of them will have shagging on the mind can have that coat hair collected for making garments.
      But look, that Tracey can have some weird things going through her mind herself so maybe it is best she does mess with her kids mind as it’d seem she is something of an expert on it.

      But back to the colours, if you want colourful take a trip to the dog salons of China and it is hideous what those poor mutts are having done to them other than being eaten and that wouldn’t be too nice for them either.

      There’s Cashmere Goats too by the way and plenty of the two legged variety in many houses of parliament no doubt, with and without goatee beards, and not making a differentiation on the sexes with that.

      And on the bags and bales, of course one goat would only have enough for three medium size bags and about three hundred or more might be needed for one bale.

      And we shouldn’t forget our cotton farmers either I suppose, even if they are a good whipping post at times for all the water they use.

      Anyone for a technicolour lamb roast with Tom!

    • Tedd says:

      03:11pm | 04/03/11

      sheeps’ balls stand out more, Gregg

    • Colette says:

      01:02pm | 04/03/11

      There are brown sheep in a paddock up the road from my house?

    • Lee from WA says:

      02:01pm | 04/03/11

      Yes, Scott Morrison wants to indoctrinate all new citizens by giving them Korans. Great point Julia.

    • Birdman104 says:

      02:13pm | 04/03/11

      People thought this actually merited a response?

    • Gregg says:

      02:35am | 05/03/11

      It is Friday or as otherwise known POETS day!

    • mmr 4/3/2011 says:

      05:45pm | 04/03/11

      The Solution is simple.
      Tracey Spicer needs to meet with the Liberals to decide the future of Christianity in Australia and schools should become optional for all children.

    • michael j says:

      01:03am | 05/03/11

      Christianity as the only true place you can find out about the use of early iron
      nails should be taught twice a week in all of our schools

    • Apostate Mate says:

      09:08am | 05/03/11

      All Abrahmic religions teach do as their imaginary friend says or else - after all, poor father Abraham was more than willing to kill his son to prove a point.  I’m sending my kids to The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster - it’s less frightening and they will sleep at night.

    • jim morris says:

      09:10am | 05/03/11

      An aborigine came to my daughter’s primary school to tell the kids how wonderful are all things aboriginal. My daughter told me she was going to ask him why they are allowed to kill turtles but she didn’t because she would have got into trouble from the teacher. See, the PC isn’t going to waste.

    • Al says:

      10:16am | 06/03/11

      If people stopped labelling themselves and associating with certain groups there woudln’t be a problem. Just be aperson. Theer’s no need to tell people you’re gay or a muslim or whatever group feels they’re being hard done by this week. Just say we’re all human.

    • Graeme & Alice says:

      10:50am | 06/03/11

      I just read that young girls are getting Gillard is a c**t tattoos! Amazing! (but cool!)

    • Mensur Cehic says:

      01:07pm | 09/04/11

      Why is it that Anglos always bitch about Political Correctness? So you can keep plucking a new victim out of the portfolio of “ethnic” minorities?
      I think you should toughen the fuck up. WE all know you have been SKIPping your well-deserved turn. There’s no way around it.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter