Handbags. They can do a lot for us girls.

Contains more than just lipstick

Big, small, clutch, tote, sleek, patent leather, tasselled and bedazzled. If you can dream it up, you can probably find it and you’ll probably enjoy the experience.

And while never as coveted as a great pair of shoes, handbags come a close second in the ever-expanding bevy of things considered essential to being ‘us’.

Katherine Eisman even wrote a book about the importance of a woman’s handbag. She found 39 examples that confirm what many of us already know; what you sling across your shoulder each day says a lot about your personality.

But can your handbag also help empower the modern multi-tasking, got-to-have-it-all woman?

British department store chain Debenhams chief handbag buyer Sue Tebbitt says yes.

Speaking to the Daily Mail after the company released market researched that showed since the onset of tiny technology think ipod, itouch and iphone, women’s handbags had become 57 per cent lighter, Tebbitt remarked breathlessly:

“Finally the burden placed upon working women is falling, and it’s all thanks to technology.”

Er, really. I mean we all love a good handbag but just because you shrink the physical size of our accessories it doesn’t mean that life itself becomes simpler.

Or that debate around issues like maternity leave and equal-pay becomes irrelevant.  In-fact our iphone could well be an apt metaphor for how much we’re all trying to squeeze in.

And it’s exactly this that makes Debenhams research interesting.

If you want to know about the issues that plague women, start with their handbag. Because how they look and what’s inside them says more about our progress through the ages than you’d realise. 

Take a look at these handbag history timelines here and here and decide for yourself.

  • In the beginning Did you know the first ever handbag was worn by a man? Found in the 14th century Egypt slung around their hips and was used to hold money or tools of their trade. Back in those times women were considered to have no need for money, a job or pretty much anything really other than having children, so what would they need a purse for?
  • Revolution Possibly inspired by the rebellious streak of the French, a few things started to change around the 1700’s. Well, we were allowed out of the house for a start. And women throughout Europe were seen slinging bags over their shoulders. (Long gowns don’t mix with leather-slung bum-bags).
  • A new kind of ‘man-bag Girls in the 18th century used the handbag to snare a husband. Handbags were a showcase for their embroidery skills and by default, their marital eligibility. Because even back then the more decoration your handbag had, the more affluent, talented and important you were perceived to be.
  • The Twentieth Century This century probably saw the biggest change in the shape of our bags. Well-bred women of the early 1900’s stuffed cosmetics, fans and opera glasses into perfectly hemmed pieces of fabric. While the shorter fashions of the 1920’s saw women asserting themselves. Bags no longer matched dresses.
  • The War Years Out with the mirrors and opera glasses and in with plastic and wood. Much cheaper to find, but I’m guessing you’d have been better off with some imagination.
  • Flower Power The 1950’s and 1960’s gave birth to the big design houses like Chanel and Louis Vuitton and so began the obsession with brands. And it was trend that matched huge social changes. More women were working than ever before.
  • Now Big is best. And if celebrities are anything to go by, the bigger the bag, the better you’ll look.

11 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      06:37am | 18/01/10

      I took a look at your linked timeline and decided for myself.

      Unlike your article, the linked piece says nothing about handbags in Egypt being only for men. Far from being powerless, women could be priestesses and even Queens.

      I’m not aware of any period in European history when women weren’t “allowed out of the house”. It would have been difficult for them to help farm the fields, or to lead military campaigns as did Joan d’Arc, if that were the case.

      Where did you get those feminist myths, which are nowhere supported by the article you linked? Did you just make them up?

    • Lucy Kippist

      Lucy Kippist says:

      08:03am | 18/01/10

      Hi Eric, what a suprise to see you here! You’re right (on the link part anyway) I forgot to include both links I used so I can see how you are confused.
      It’s in there now.

    • Danni says:

      08:04am | 18/01/10

      Or if you just had a few pockets made into your clothes, like men have, you wouldn’t need a handbag at all, as your wallet phone and keys would happily sit in pockets. Problem solved.
      Oh I forgot, it’s about appearance not function.

    • T.Chong says:

      08:27am | 18/01/10

      “Now big is best, and if celebrities are anything to go by…,”
      Curios that the article is all about the gals getting ahead and liberating via handbags (no issues there), yet the concluding powerpoint once again relying on the validation of “celebrities”.
      Why the obsession with what “celebrites” do or dont say and do ?
      Is Paris and her chihahua carryong handbag really that important?
      Crazy idea: do something for yourself without waiting for Paris, Nicole ,Britney or Posh to be paid big bucks for flogging a product.

    • brendon says:

      07:57am | 20/01/10

      What is a carryong handbag?

    • Bec says:

      08:58am | 18/01/10

      They can be functional though, Danni. (Though we are in complete agreement about the lack of pockets and craftsmanship of women’s clothing in general. Being able to let your hands swing free without having to hold phone, wallet and lifesaving medication is something we should enjoy too!)

      I miss the days where handbags were the big, leather ones that all mums seemed to carry. They were owned for about fifteen years and always had some sort of crust lining the bottom made up of lipstick, mintie wrappers, lint and old receipts. You’d go fishing for an odd coin, or lolly, and there was always something interesting in there. If I have a feminist complaint about our fashion and consumption today, it’s that accessories like bags and shoes are of infinitely poorer quality than they were ten years ago, and a lot of the pushes for big bag and shoe collections means lower quality, poorer treatment of the labour which makes the product, and increasing landfill.

      My bag is awesome; expensive but no-name in a classic style with both plain calfskin and patent leather (so it can go with any outfit). It’s big enough to hold a jumper and a laptop and textbooks, and is still fairly compact and space saving. It may have cost several hundreds of dollars (which took ages to pay off on layby) but that will equate to a very cheap cost-per-use over the ten years or so that I can use it for, so long as it’s cared for properly. Best of all, I have guarantee of knowing that it was made in a non-exploitative environment. It’s not on-trend, but it will look better over the years than those hideous fabric logo-print bags will next year.

    • Liz says:

      08:59am | 18/01/10

      Who says shoes are more important? Obviously your age showing!
      Doesn’t it depend on your lifestyle..you’re not talking about real working women who need pockets as much as any man!
      Gosh it’s sloppy journalism not to get your links right and your info correct!Must be Monday morning as well as slipping standards.

    • Ally says:

      08:00am | 20/01/10

      A monday morning moan - more like it Liz.
      Maybe just let the story be a bit fun. Something to think about.
      Ok.

    • Marion Simpson says:

      09:40am | 18/01/10

      I recently bought a new black Guess handbag at the sales, its so nice I really think I should frame it instead of using it. Most women love a “decent ” handbag, its a feel good thing.

    • ChrisD says:

      10:36am | 18/01/10

      @ Danni

      Tell a mother of a two year old she doesn’t need a handbag and that pockets will do fine. You’ll be requiring a bodybag after taking that position.

    • allegra says:

      08:22pm | 18/01/10

      i finally convinced my husband to buy me a hermes birkin. he wasn’t too impressed with the price, but understands they never lose value or go out of fashion.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter