News that up to 21 navy sailors were allegedly running a drug ring from the Garden Island Navy base in Sydney, and that about 30 more were possibly involved in distributing the contraband, has shone the spotlight into a dark corner of military life.

The military: is it all about getting ripped? Pic: Bob Barker.

With recent raids uncovering illicit drugs including steroids, heroin, cocaine and ecstasy, the extent of drug trafficking and substance abuse by military personnel is now being exposed and it is not a pretty picture.

The vast majority of navy, army and air force personnel are clean living, law abiding citizens, but for those who aren’t there are many opportunities to take advantage of their status as returning warriors and their mode of military transport to import illegal material.

This is not restricted to drugs and for years the duty free limits on cigarettes and alcohol have been flouted by some personnel returning to Australia on air force flights or navy ships.

While civilian luggage is subjected to layered security screening involving high-tech equipment such as X-ray machines and less technical methods such as sniffer dogs, military personnel are often given special treatment by their uniformed colleagues from the powerful Customs service.

Soldiers coming home on flights landing late at night at military airports, or sailors on warships sailing back to a grateful nation and their anxious families are not subjected to anywhere near the level of scrutiny that civilian travellers must endure.

This lax approach has provided numerous opportunities for criminal elements to ply their trade and the extent of the navy drug ring, operating right under the noses of the top brass at maritime headquarters in Sydney Harbour, indicates that warships have become the platform of choice for the dealers.

The fact that the dominant illicit substance being marketed by the military pushers is anabolic steroids is another worrying development.

Many young men and women in uniform are obsessed with body image and spend hours each day pumping iron and drinking bodybuilding supplements in a bid to gain an edge in the ripped body stakes. Some are even prepared to run the gauntlet of random drug testing and port security to use and import steroids.

The marketing material used by supplement companies provides an insight into the mind set of the body building industry and their buff clients. They openly peddle ``testosterone and growth hormone boosters, fat burners and metabolisers and muscle cell volumisers’‘.

And some firms even use the iconic image of a slouch hat and the Australian flag to promote discounts to members of the Australian Defence Force who they are ``proud to serve’‘.

And what self-respecting iron pumper could resist brands such as Redback, Dymatize, Muscle Tech, Body Ripped, Aussie Bodies or our favourite, Muscle Asylum Project?

At military bases throughout Australia and across the world, larders are stocked with bulk-packaged supplements and gyms are bulging with weight lifting equipment.

At forward operating bases in Afghanistan the muscle building equipment might not be fancy but it is effective. After a hard day’s patrolling, diggers from the Mentoring Task Force settle in for a sweaty session of weights and a long supplement drink often followed by a screening of the latest body building DVD featuring men that look more like the incredible hulk than a human being.

Presumably the top brass have judged that the supplements are safe and that pumped up soldiers are happy campers.

The national obsession with body image has seen the market for illicit anabolic steroids boom in recent years. Once the preserve of elite athletes searching for an edge, the substances are now sold by dealers across the suburban landscape where gyms have sprouted like mushrooms.

Steroids are the best known of all banned substances used by sports drug cheats. Unlike supplements that claim to boost testosterone and growth hormone levels, anabolic steroids actually do just that. They increase protein synthesis within cells resulting in the build-up of tissue especially in muscles.

One indicator of steroid use is body mass index (BMI) and soldiers exhibiting extreme BMI are routinely tested for steroid use.

Using anabolic steroids carries significant health risks and users can suffer from high blood pressure, heart problems, shrunken testicles and psychological disorders including the well documented ``roid rage’’ where they fly into uncontrollable fits of anger.

Last year seven ADF personnel were sent home from Afghanistan and drummed out of the army for steroid abuse. Between 2004 and 2009 a total of 351 military staff were sacked for illicit drug use including steroids. These numbers are not large from a work force of 56,000 people, but they do hint at a growing trend in drug abuse by men and women in uniform.

Defence has a zero tolerance drug policy and the top brass deny that the problem is widespread, but they are concerned enough to expand the random testing regime.

Meanwhile, young soldiers will continue their quest for the perfect supplement and spend hours every day bench pressing twice their body weight or snatching and jerking ever increasing loads as they pack on the muscle mass and cut up the fat in search of that perfect ``ripped’’ body.

58 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Seamus says:

      08:51am | 05/01/11

      Having spent five deployments ranging between 6 and 10 months in the Far East Strategic Reserve and three overseas postings in a twenty year naval career, I had cause to experience customs inspections fairly regularly.  All of my sea time was in destroyers and frigates.  On two occasions I was the naval liaison person between the ship’s company and Customs.  Never did I encounter any of the tales alluded to by Mr McPhedran.  I always found Customs officers to be courteous, thorough and professional.  Sure, there are bad apples in every case but I feel Mr McPhedran’s article was a tad ‘pie in the sky’.

    • Robin says:

      12:47pm | 06/01/11

      When I was serving in the Military Customs scrutiny of flights coming into Australia was extreme with clearance taking hours in some cases. I am sure some of the older Journo’s who accompanied high ranking politicians on journeys overseas can attest to the scrutiny they received on landing in Australia. I can remember once when Prince Charles arrived the clearance took over 2 hours.

    • Jane says:

      09:08am | 05/01/11

      If by ‘well documented’ you mean reported on in the context of government and media scare campaigns then you would be correct. Otherwise I think you’d find that the ‘well documented’ proof of “roid rage” is not so well documented any more. The ‘significant health risks’ you provide are carried by a lot of normal things we do, too.

    • Steve says:

      09:54am | 05/01/11

      If they drug-tested everyone in the ADF on a Sunday morning I think the brass would be in for a rude shock…

    • Leto says:

      11:29am | 05/01/11

      Spot on.

      I knew many a defence member who used to take the odd pill or speed on the weekend. It’s out of your system very quickly. One of them now flies a Black Hawk helicopter.

      But I say, so what? If a soldier has been drunk before, does it then follow that he would be drunk on operations? I do not believe it does. Soldiers aren’t robots. They want to live, and try new things as well. Our society has drugs for everything… but anything for fun is illegal. 

      Join the ANA… you get to smoke hash all day, even when on patrol!

    • Robert Smissen, rural SA, God's own country says:

      10:39pm | 05/01/11

      WWII pilots where given “speed” to keep the flying & so were the boffins at Bletchley Park, nothing new here

    • The Badger says:

      11:35am | 06/01/11

      Robert Smissen
      US Air Force fighter pilots were given preludin in their kit bags during the Vietnam war in case they were shot down.
      They could run through the jungle for days without sleep.
      I believe this drug is now banned in the US

    • AndrewK says:

      10:03am | 05/01/11

      “Between 2004 and 2009 a total of 351 military staff were sacked for illicit drug use including steroids. These numbers are not large from a work force of 56,000 people”

      “Defence has a zero tolerance drug policy and the top brass deny that the problem is widespread”

      Using your figures, I’d say the Defence spokesman has a pretty good point. Crunching the numbers, 351 personnel over a 6 year period = 58.5 personnel per year.

      58.5/56, 000 = 0.001045. In other words, people getting the boot for drugs from the ADF is, on average, approximately one tenth of one percent (0.1045%) of the total force strength of the ADF..

      When compared to the Australian Government’s statistics on illicit drug use in the general populace (see here, page 40: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/phe/soduia06/soduia06.pdf) which plots the rate at hovering around 15%, it would appear that the drug problem in the ADF (where members are subect to random drug testing) is nothing close to that in the civilian world, to the point of being almost negligible.

      Lies, damned lies and statistics!

    • Jay says:

      07:37am | 06/01/11

      Nice work AndrewK - unfortunately your stats don’t help the author sensationalise his story so of course he woudn’t report on them.

    • Sludger says:

      10:20am | 05/01/11

      Obviously written by someone who has never served.  What a load of garbage.  I did 12 years in the service.  Yes, there are those who body build, most of us though just wanted a beer to unwind.  And I don’t remember getting all excited about the latest DVD with big muscles.  DVD’s with good looking women was our choice.  And customs ALWAYS inspected us.  They treated us well, but they still checked what we took home.  A very lazy piece of writing by someone who has no idea.  And your stats suck.  As Andrew K (above) pointed out, the total percentage is very very low.  Why sling dirt on our servicemen and women for the sake of it?  Why not investigate the number of journalists with alcohol/drug problems?  Might make for more interesting reading.

    • Bobster says:

      12:22pm | 05/01/11

      “Why not investigate the number of journalists with alcohol/drug problems?  Might make for more interesting reading.”

      Wouldn’t that just be stating the bleeding obvious?

    • AndrewK says:

      12:22pm | 05/01/11

      I think it is perhaps more disappointing in that Ian McPhedran has written some really ripper things about the ADF in the past. This, on the other hand, gives the impression of being rapidly cobbled together to create controversy.

    • RANsailor says:

      10:43am | 05/01/11

      Totally agreeing with Seamus here, defence members are no less checked than any other member of the general public when we return. Mr McPhedran is dreaming if he thinks we get any special treatment, certainly not in my experience, be it flying back into the country or sailing back in the heads.

    • Rach says:

      10:44am | 05/01/11

      I think the article has a sentence or two wrong… shouldn’t it be:

      “After a hard day’s patrolling, diggers settle in for a sweaty session of weights and a long supplement drink, followed by a jerk and clean during the screening of the latest body building DVD featuring men”...

      Roid use will always be more prevalent in occupations such as police, security and military as it is more likely to attract men with body image issues who believe “bigger is better” in terms of body size muscle, and are prepared to accept a smaller package downstairs as the side effect…

      They do it to impress other men (quite homoerotic when you think about it), not us women… who would rather a man be big where it counts… their brain (get your mind out of the gutter!)

    • Sludger says:

      11:16am | 05/01/11

      Rach, that is probably one of the most stupid posts I have ever read on Punch.  How do you know men work out to impress men?  I certainly did not.  I maintained fitness for my job, that was it.  And where are your figures on Roid use in the military?  As someone who did 12 years, I didn’t see it.  It was probably there somewhere, but was certainly not common or flaunted.  You have a nice little snide jab implying homosexuality.  What happened to you?  Some serviceman give you the flick?  Sad little woman.

    • brain food says:

      11:56am | 05/01/11

      I served 23 years with the RAAF, and I can say returning to Australia, either as regular flight crew or from a posting, posed no problems with Customs. The only other avenue to divert drugs or any other contraband, was in the diplomatic courier sachel, controlled only by the aircraft captain. Other declared items, from RAAF personnel included watches, perfume etc. On the other hand, I want some of those “roids”. My muscles are a bit stringy, but I’m not too impressed with the shrinking goolies (and their handle) bit. My brain tells me this. I’m 80.

    • AndrewK says:

      12:04pm | 05/01/11

      Aaaw, has somebody been studying Gender Studies at uni?

    • Jack says:

      01:03pm | 05/01/11

      Rach

      People are allowed to be gay, military or otherwise. My boyfriend has been in the RAAF for over 10 years (I am a male) and he says there are quite a few openly gay people, both male and female.

      And yes, there is some steriod abuse in the army, but there is also this same abuse everywhere. Way more in the state police departments. I know this from experience.

      You may have something with the body image issues though. That is something that is quite often forgotten about when it comes to men, as we also feel the pressure to look good that women do.

      Sludger, don’t get so defensive. It was only a post from a woman’s perspective. You need to relax more. Make that your resolution for this year, okay?

    • BobbyDan says:

      01:46pm | 05/01/11

      @Jack, the RAAF has always had a tolerance of homosexual people, mainly in the non combat musterings (stewards, clerks, Medical Orderlys’).
      I had a major operation in 6 RAAF Hospital at Laverton in 1982 and the nursing I had from two (1 male, 1 female) known homosexuals was much more gentle and compassionate than any of the other staff.
      As for drug and steroid use, so what, just so long as the use does not effect performance of compromise security.
      Smuggling on aircraft, there will always be users, risk takers and get rich quick people at all levels of rank and job position. I would be the first to blow the whistle on anyone I knew that was selling to others, particularly the young.

    • Roger says:

      04:35pm | 05/03/12

      @Sludger

      Well if you were dumped by a fairly attractive lass for another lass, then it could be a shock to the system. Or a group of guys standing around admiring each others muscles could be homoerotic. Both of those are quite reasonable.


      @Rach

      You agree to ‘roid use, but say they instead use supplements because they’re gay? Tut, tut. raspberry Focus your comment (advice I give out and never follow), and leave out disclaimers. You’ll look more intelligent and anyone who disagrees with you looks silly.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      10:56am | 05/01/11

      Probably not Navy and Army, only Airforce would have regular opportunity to smuggle drugs. I doubt that the Australians do it on a significant scale but I have no doubt that drug smuggling goes on from the Afghanistan campaign to the western world under the guise of military activity and recently UK and US soldiers were under investigation for such alleged activity

    • BK says:

      10:58am | 05/01/11

      There are a range of suppliments in American produced magazines and websites. Many of them are available in most of the world but not here. Part of the problem is Austalia’s excessive drug laws.

    • Joe Stanford says:

      11:02am | 05/01/11

      You all know shit-all!  I was in the defence force 10 years ago and I can tell you it was a multi-million dollar industry back then.  In fact I know of 1 person who went missing when the defence closed in on them and they started to talk…. needless to say the Sydney cartels took him for an extended chat.

      The major drug problems began when the defence force implemented random screening, which turned the mostly pot smoking users onto harder chemicals to avoid detection.  The same issue now facing the Mining Industry.  The problem also lies in the fact that the defence force simply evicts detected personnell rather than facing the issue of why they where using in the first place.  This story shows how little they care and how stupid their arcade policies are.  They are willing to drop people who they have trained and trusted at considerable cost over sometimes a one-time mistake.  It won’t be long time before a clever lawyer puts together a wide-ranging class action for ex-personnell who where adversely affected by defence force policies.

      Oh, and Ian do more research before sticking your neck out

    • QT says:

      03:01pm | 05/01/11

      They have arcades in the military? Like Timezone? How cool…! If all the soldiers took up gaming instead of roids there wouldn’t be a problem.

      Just kidding, mate… but I couldn’t help it… I know you meant “arcane”.

    • Robbo says:

      03:48pm | 05/01/11

      dead on Joe its more prevalent than they think. Just do real random testing on everyone regulary and watch the results.

    • DJ says:

      11:37am | 05/01/11

      The US gov has admitted to protecting opium fields in Afghanistan. The reason,” If we don’t get the money, then Al,Quaeda will.” Problem solved…

      They are drug smugglers full stop.

    • Rob says:

      11:53am | 05/01/11

      I remember when I was at one particular high-profile unit the testers would “randomly” select those people they knew were not on anything, so as to not cause a fuss.

    • Guy Lee Hanlon says:

      12:04pm | 05/01/11

      what else are warships good for but drugs and fireworks?
      Wars are more useless than drugs.

    • Peter Simmons says:

      12:31pm | 05/01/11

      Except you Guy Lee.

      What a ridiculous statement. Twenty years in the Army and I saw one soldier take drugs and she was in the Army Reserve.  Did she smuggle them through customs Mr McPhedron?

      Never once heard or seen any soldier taking Steroids.  Mr McPhedron should reveal his “sources”.

    • Richie says:

      12:56pm | 05/01/11

      20 years and you never heard of anyone taking steroids? Was it the period 1920-1940 by any chance? I have been in for 9 years, and while it isn’t common, it is definitely there. But steroids are not as popular as “party drugs” of course…

    • Tripper Smurf says:

      12:57pm | 05/01/11

      I actually probably would of joined the army in my younger days exceot for the simple fact that I enjoy a smoke of mary-jane in the eveninings every so often in lieu of having the beer that most of my mates partake in.  The sad fact is that I know that I am not alone in these thoughts and that the ADF as a consquence have missed out some rather talented people just because of their life-choice in smoking a relativley harmless substance that is untaxable and therefore controlled.

      Other substances which are more likely to affect you severely (more than beer) and/or arent natural should of course have the penalties applied to them that they do currently.  This is due to the documentated affects that many of these ‘drugs’ have that are still uncofirmed with marijuana.

      While it would be understandable to ensure that noone is intoxicated in a war zone (beers included) outside of this, during the soldier’s spare time, where it doesnt affect their quality of work, you will have a hard time justifying the military’s stance on pot to me.

    • Bob says:

      02:21pm | 05/01/11

      Obviously all these years of being a pot-head has destroyed your spelling and grammar.

    • SM says:

      02:31pm | 05/01/11

      because something is “untaxed”, why does that necessarily mean it is therefore “controlled”?

    • rick says:

      03:23pm | 06/01/11

      no person who really smokes a little herb would really call themselves “tripper smurf”.  Drongo.

    • Outraged says:

      03:48pm | 05/01/11

      What a nasty article!

      These men and women are over in foreign countries, fighting and DYING to protect our lives and way of living…yet people like you try and tear them down with sly hints at their sexuality and drug-use?

      I am more suspicious of JOURNALISTS who cast aspersions on other people. Most people who enter the field of journalism do so so that THEY get to ask the questions of others…but no-one ever questions YOU, Mr. McPhedron! What are YOU hiding?

    • Sludger says:

      04:11pm | 05/01/11

      Absolutely agree with you Outraged.  Why do people see the need to attack a group of basically decent people?  Yes, there are a couple of druggies etc in there.  There is in any walk of life.  Just spite, or perhaps envy?

    • St Michael says:

      05:18pm | 05/01/11

      @ Outraged: I call bullshit and invocation of Rear Area Guilt on your post.  Just because you might take a bullet for your country doesn’t put you beyond criticism.

      Put it this way: there is another group of people in our society who put themselves at risk of DYING EVERYDAY to protect our lives and way of living.  They are also armed, highly trained, and wear uniforms.  They regularly go into dangerous situation.  They are collectively known as “the police”.  Don’t know about you, but I’d be just a tad concerned if my local constable was fired up on ‘roids and/or amphetamines before going out on a night’s patrol round the ‘burbs.  I’d appreciate a JOURNUHLUST who brought those acts to light.  Wouldn’t you?

      Probably not, because Afghanistan’s obviously not in your backyard.  The problem being that such men and women represent this country.  You can’t say an excess by a serving soldier was not in your name if you chose to put the man beyond criticism.

    • rick says:

      06:53pm | 05/01/11

      BS.  They are murdering babies.  Don’t think that we are behind these war criminals or that they are worthy of any respect whatsoever.  The baby killers learnt nothing from vietnam except how to control the media.  All canon fodder must not come back home under any circumstances.

    • rick says:

      04:21pm | 05/01/11

      The official drug rings exist simply because they are just that.  You see the idea behind making drugs illegal in the first place is so that those with power can control man through his vices.  This only works if the powerful officials can control the supply.  They do this by using the law enforcement apparatus to destroy their opposition.  The war on drugs is a war on the opposition. The proceeds are used to finance illegal wars and coups.  Oh and siphoned off to make some individuals wealthy.

      Remember Iran Contra?

      The drugs are indeed brought in via the Navy, they are transferred to war vessels by CIA and other US military officials during war games, at sea, and brought in in bulk.

      Remember who made these drugs illegal in the first place.  And why.

    • bob says:

      12:46am | 06/01/11

      rick, it sounds to me like you need some therapy.

    • Jon says:

      03:07pm | 09/05/11

      rick - put the joint down..! What an amazing statement from such an ignorant pathetic little man. Who exactly are murdering babies? No one that I have ever served with has ever done anything but risk their lives in saving those which these Islamic nutcases would wipe out just to prove that Mohammed loves them. You sound like a brainwashed Taliban moron with no education!

    • kerrie o'rourke says:

      05:29pm | 05/01/11

      the army, the navy and the air force should be abolished.

    • kerrie o'rourke says:

      05:38pm | 05/01/11

      Abolish wars! Abolish the military! Abolish Drugs! Abolish parliament! Abolish the police and jails! Restore Anarchy

    • St. Michael says:

      08:54pm | 05/01/11

      ... just in case you thought the ‘roids problem was restricted to the armed forces ...

    • rick says:

      12:55am | 06/01/11

      yeah baby, yeah!

    • Peter Simmons says:

      05:56pm | 05/01/11

      Did you go to the same school as Guy Lee,  Kerrie?  Another absolutly ridiculous comment.
      No Richie,  I left 18 months ago.  Try taking steroids in an Arms Unit and see how long you last.  Your own colleagues will put you in.

    • Robert Smissen, rural SA, God's own country says:

      10:42pm | 05/01/11

      I think this story is a beat-up, mind you a close friend brought a gold plated M16 home from Vietnam during the 60s.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      05:32am | 07/01/11

      Why would you gold plate an M16? Now an AK 47 I could understand…...

    • Jay says:

      07:55am | 06/01/11

      Mr McPhedran, do you sit in your office and wonder what kind of story you can write to cast the ADF in a poor light?  Your kind of reporting smacks of poor research and dodgy statistics.  Don’t let the facts get in the way of a good story.

      I have deployed a number of times and have undergone very strict AQIS searches where the check through everything in my bag before sealing my luggage with tags (do civvies have to do that???) and then scrutinised by customs when passing back through the airport. 

      I can’t help but feel offended and angry when I read your articles because they appear to attack the ADF - from the guys and girls on the ground to senior officers in Canberra.  It seems you set out to write like you know about our lifestyle but what comes out on paper is in fact you know SFA.  And the uneducated civilian public lap it up and jump on the bandwagon to bash the military with you.

    • SapperDad says:

      09:36am | 06/01/11

      Well said Jay. McPhedran is bitter he never got an embedded patrol while on a visit to Afghanistan. He wanted to get into a combat situation and make a name for himself. Hence the Vendetta against the Army.

    • aker says:

      09:23am | 06/01/11

      Dont know wether to agree or not…but i do suspect that it has happened in the past during Vietnam…..all drug importation is in collusion with governments imo….it keeps politicians in work,lawyers,hospitals,correctional facilities….the list goes on….its all a scam run by the governments and organised by governments…..is it just coincidence that America is supposedly at war with the biggest producer of heroin on the planet…..Iraq:big benificiery of oil…..anywhere they can profit under the disguise of war they’ll invade.

    • Anthony says:

      01:30pm | 06/01/11

      Customs doesn’t scrutinise the Defence much because there is a brotherhood between these two organisations in modern times that most people would not understand. With massive cooperation from Navy/Customs in people smuggling operations, and often joint ops, both these organisations have developed a mutual respect and understanding. I am not condoning nor implying that drug importation or the ‘blind eye’ respectively are alright, but honestly Ian, a few bottles of booze and some cigarettes are a bit different to accusing the Defence of being drug smugglers.

    • rick says:

      02:35pm | 06/01/11

      Are not the police the ones who are accusing Defence of being Drug Smugglers?  Have they not collected the evidence and charged some of the perpetrators?

      Is the world not changing before your very eyes?

    • Rod Gearing says:

      08:47pm | 09/01/11

      Mr McPhedran is not the silly dill you purport him to be . The Australian Military have had modern problems with drug smugglers and users since the early 1960’s. The issues have been dealt with swiftly and effectively by the ADF in a timely manner. Bad apples? Yes. But not many in comparison to the rest of society. My Navy unit at Garden Island (Fleet Maintenance) in the mid-70’s had the full force of the wire-brush and Dettol applied to it at the time and then faced the full force of Naval, Commonwealth and NSW criminal legislation. Heads rolled. Lots of heads. This was serious stuff at the time. My observation is that the Military are no better or no worse than the society that has spawned them.. Just like the Police, we get what we deserve. (Sadly).

    • rick says:

      04:22pm | 10/01/11

      Yes, if only we could have a military that didn’t have as it’s base the committal of war crimes.  How could you expect anything good to come from the deliberate and/or reckless targeting of innocent civilians for violent deaths on an industrial scale.

    • Rod Gearing says:

      11:23pm | 25/02/11

      Dear Rick,
      Please just calm down. We volunteered to look after guys like you. We actually feel responsible for your wellbeing, your welfare, your safety, your future. Take a couple of deap breaths and just settle down a little bit. You’re probably a nice bloke, and your heart is in the right place, but seriously - you appear to me to be a genuine, specially dipped 24 carat gold plated dickhead. Please don’t take my observations personally. It’s just that you appear to be a genuine dicky-whacking wanker. Did you ever have the priviledge of serving in any branch of the Australian Defence Forces? If so, did you actually make any friends (or any difference)? Do you feel safe whilst living in this country right now? If you don’t, once again don’t lose too much sleep, because there are thousands of ADF personnel out there (land , sea & air) sitting on the wall just to ensure that you can have a comfortable, peaceful sleep tonight.  Just loosen up,  relax a bit. Cheers, from the good guys. We’re on your side mate, on your side.

    • rick says:

      08:15pm | 25/03/11

      Yeah yeah, tell me a little about the program son.

      In person.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter