A couple of months ago, no-one had heard of the plump, bushy-browed lady who lived alone with her cat, Pebbles, and volunteered at the local church. A woman who not only dared to dream of a different life, but sing about it as well. Initially hostile, audiences and judges were swept off their feet, including the millions that watched her performance on YouTube.

Not exactly cut from the same cloth: Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt and Susan Boyle. Photos: AFP / ITV

Susan Boyle has experienced 15 hellish minutes and then some. Now she’s paying the price. So many long for the patina of stardom, but the cost is high – public adoration, humiliation and desecration – and they must do it without the attendant minders, spin doctors, psychologists and personal trainers to boost the flailed ego that Hollywood stars know is essential.

The scrutiny SuBo (the nickname bestowed upon her by fans), has endured since first stepping onto the stage and swinging those hips, has been intense. From the moment she opened her mouth and that voice soared, we invested in Susan and her dream, understanding that if she could fulfill hers, then us ordinary folk had a chance too. We shared vicariously in her triumph.  Susan came to stand for all those who, for whatever reason, were denied opportunities, in life, relationships and careers. She became a beacon of hope in a world that tends to offer mostly false ones.

From being the darling of the world press, however, Susan quickly became its target as tantrums and tears were reported and read. But is anyone surprised? Poppies that dare to raise their vibrant heads above the field inevitably get cruelly lopped. Even poppies who for years were left to seed and didn’t ask for the kind of elevation they received.

From incredulity and excitement about this middle-aged dreamer, to taunts and even, during judge Piers Morgan’s rapturous analysis of her final performance, hissing and booing, Susan Boyle has been on a roller coaster. She thought that in entering Britain’s Got Talent, she was playing one kind of game only to find that, somewhere during the competition, the rules changed and she was immersed in the fame game instead.

Her sexual life was exposed, the fact she was deprived of oxygen at birth – the kind of minutiae that used to be reserved for biographies of famous people was now water cooler talk. When she had her eyebrows plucked, hair styled and wore a new outfit, it made global headlines. Suddenly, Boyle was depicted as having had a ‘make-over’ as if this lovely, dowdy woman with a sense of humour was afflicted with a big head. Her raised voice and swearing were also reported as symptoms of either a rampant narcissist or a personality ill-equipped to handle stardom and therefore undeserving.

How unfair is this? We put this woman on the Petri dish of celebrity, magnify her every word and moment and wonder why she doesn’t appear so wholesome or appealing any more.

Celebrity or even the desire to have your talents recognised is, in this YouTube eats Twitter world, not for the feint-hearted or even those with a big heart. Susan might be on track, as runner-up, to earn (as the pundits predict) somewhere in the vicinity of $20 million, certainly she’s already a household name. But the truth is, her private dream has become a very public nightmare.

6 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • delperro says:

      01:38pm | 01/06/09

      yeah fair call but you fail to admit that the reason that she became so famous was not that she sung, but that she sung and was hideously ugly. That was novel.

    • p davis says:

      01:43pm | 01/06/09

      I don’t believe some of the remarks about this woman.Frumpy,bushy eyed,virgin,she had a great voice and some people obviously don’t own a mirror.Take a good look at yourselves before ripping shreds off others.

    • tracy heiss says:

      01:44pm | 01/06/09

      Let’s face it…humans (as a species) suck.

    • regina says:

      02:37pm | 01/06/09

      to answer the question, at least one person who knew the real susan boyle had expressed concern about how she might deal with the attention, and would not be surprised by what’s happened now.

      back in april, after her first appearance on the program, her parish priest said in an interview with a catholic news service …

      ‘people are slightly worried about what might happen after this bout of fame … i am quite worried for her. i think it’s great at one level. it might just be the thing that will make her, but she is a very vulnerable person and it could be quite difficult’ …

      http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0901753.htm.

    • Vicki Pavlos says:

      03:10pm | 01/06/09

      It would seem she has some intellectual and/or emotional impairments , due to being oxygen-starved at birth. That is now well documented.

      When the Susan Boyle hoop-la began, a reporter from The Scotsman newspaper battled to get an interview with her. The eventual story, long on comment and back story and short on substance, says Boyle is considered emotionally “fragile”.

      Anecdotal evidence abounds of her being bullied by the village idiots over the years.

      Anyone who shot to mega-stardom the way she did would need an iron-clad support team to manage the consequences.

      Boyle, who seems to have intellectual and emotional disabilities, needs precisely such a team to get her through this. No surprise she cracked.

      She is a fabulously talented singer, who has no problem understanding the emotional depths of the material she sings, but on a more earthly level, her relationship skills and conflict resolution skills appear to be lacking.

      I hope she gets the support she needs.  Psychological help would seem imperative.

      It’s pathetically sad that she is being vilified for her public hissy fits which are due to her impairments.

      It’s a shallow, shallow, shallow world.

    • alf mcdonald says:

      09:05pm | 01/06/09

      who lost the competition, susan boyle and the punters,who backed a winner only to be beaten by the bookmakers by a rigged phone in vote.this this competition should have been only judged by the people who judged them in the first place otherwise why have the panel there in the first place.this outcome has much to be desired,money involved in the outcome of this talent quest should not have been an option for anyone to profit by.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter