Good Government is about empowering people, creating a sense of community, facilitating change and giving people real choices.

Government policies are encouraging a handout mentality. Photo: Getty Images

Fifty years ago the people managed our communities, looked after employment, hospitals, policing and schools. Problems that occurred in the community were sorted out by the community.

However successive policies by both parties have moved Australia away from a community empowerment model towards a centralized control system with bureaucrats managing down on communities. The people with the power to help sort out problems with hospitals, policing and towns have been progressively removed from our communities, taking their power with them.

Now, local police commanders and hospital managers are appointed by State and Federal bureaucrats without local input. Community people are excluded from these decisions and are unable to apply their hard learned knowledge about what works.

Regional communities have been left with low resources and a handout mentality.

Governments have taken over community management. In Australia, roughly 6 per cent of Government spending is allocated to communities - in America and England it’s somewhere around 24 per cent.

I recently came across the following statistic: in the 1960s there were 22 taxpayers for every person on a Government benefit – welfare, pensions, etc. Now there are around six. This is a damning statistic which paints me a very clear picture about what happened to the Roman Empire.

When you stop listening to your communities you destroy people’s enthusiasm to deliver services and they start coming to work for the money and not the passion. Their voices are no longer heard, mistakes are made. Hospitals are a classic example. There are more health service bureaucrats then people delivering the service.

When communities are disempowered to the extent that we have been in Australia you don’t get the best people standing for local Governments. Why waste your time when there is no real decision making? In city and coastal areas you get tin pot property developers on councils after a fast buck - in the bush we generally get the incompetent.

Rural and regional communities have suffered, and Aboriginal people whose lives are buffeted by shifts and changes in government policy, have suffered more.

Most non-Aboriginal Australians would have no idea what it feels like to have your family and community directly managed by bureaucracy.  Indigenous families live daily with the revolving door of Government decision-making.

In our regional communities Aboriginal people wait for the Government to solve their problems. The local council sees Aboriginal affairs as a State and Federal Government issue, so it’s not their problem. It’s why we have large scale dysfunction in our Aboriginal communities in regional Australia.

But despite this, I believe that Aboriginal people lie at the heart of reinvigorating our regional communities.

While years of drought and centralization policies see non-Indigenous Australians leave town, Aboriginal people will remain in regional Australia and grow because of their connection and commitment to their country and their higher birth rate.

So the answer to reviving our regional communities lies with our youth – empowering the next generation of Indigenous Australians to take leadership positions in their communities and drive them forward.

Investing in the Indigenous leaders of tomorrow make both social and economic sense. The collectivist nature of Aboriginal communities means that by empowering individuals through education we will empower those around them.

The Aboriginal Employment Strategy was set up for precisely that reason. It’s a company 100 per cent managed by Aboriginal people that manages up not down. It builds self esteem, pride and self belief and is a grass roots community model that works.

Our goal is to create a group of young, skilled and motivated Aboriginal people that set new standards in Aboriginal success and career path development, and are proud of their communities and where they come from. This group of people will be the new wave of community leaders.

In giving greater decision making and funding to communities some will manage better than others. It’s up to local communities to judge their leaders and remove them where necessary at local elections; a rising tide lifts all ships. If there is money in communities people will focus on the spending decisions.

These days people in regional Australia blame federal politicians and bureaucrats for the failures in their communities and cynicism about politicians and political agendas grows daily.

We get plenty of debate about getting rid of State Governments but the focus should be empowering people and better funding for local Governments, to stop the handout mentality. It’s about giving power and decision making back to communities. 

All politics needs to start at a local level. By empowering communities, and managing up we will get a better standard of politician entering State and Federal Parliament.

We need more politicians that are used to delivering, not lightweights that don’t know how to make a decision and spend millions on consultancies, leaving no funding for local initiatives. NSW is a study in centralized decision making gone wrong. 

The power to turn this around lies in the hands of the people and good debate which focuses on empowerment. It’s imperative that we invest in our Indigenous youth, empower our regional communities and we can rebuild an Australia that is better geared for the future.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Get The Punch on Twitter and Facebook

Most commented

17 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • stevie says:

      07:14am | 27/05/10

      There is only one glaring fault in your article Dick and its where you say “Problems that occurred in the community were sorted out by the community.”

      That’s just it - they weren’t.

    • Stephanie says:

      03:05pm | 27/05/10

      only one? as a working woman struggling to pay a mortgage on my own, I see this “In our regional communities Aboriginal people wait for the Government to solve their problems.” as a problem also!

      But I guess it backs this up “I recently came across the following statistic: in the 1960s there were 22 taxpayers for every person on a Government benefit – welfare, pensions, etc. Now there are around six”

    • Vic Martin says:

      08:50am | 27/05/10

      Your ideas and initiatives have great merit and deserve praise.. The remote areas of the NT and WA are still using the stick instead of the carrot. And while the solutions are as clear as the nose on your face, inept and uncommitted bureaucracies soak up vast sums achieving very little.  Until governments give greater recognition to the people working on the ground in communities and realise they are not just “mercenaries, missionaries and ‘misfits” and are able to produce results everyone wants if properly resourced, things will stay the same for a long time.

    • iansand says:

      09:22am | 27/05/10

      Will the group of young, skilled and motivated Aboriginal people stay in, or return to, the communities?  Or will they leave for, or stay with, the opportunities available to them in the cities?  A large part of any strategy must be the creation of economic opportunities within the communities.  It is a monumental task, and I wish you luck.

    • acker says:

      11:08am | 27/05/10

      @iansand ..Australia needs to get educated that it is unsustainable for everyone to congregate on top of each other in urban shoeboxes in this vast nation. And people flying in and out of remote and rural communities to work defeats the purpose of why the city was built in the first place.

      It does not help any of the local Pilbara communities in the long term that Andrew Forrest or Gina Rienhardt and their circus of travelling fly in/fly out management and workers take their finite resources from the ground forever. And take most of the profits from it back to Perth, Sydney, London, New York, Tokyo, Monte Carlo or Shang Hi

      Leaving little wealth back in the local community they stripped the primary resource wealth from.

      Australia has seen this all before when areas like the Riverina powered the wool boom primary resources that the tax revenue from mostly built the Sydney Harbour Bridge, Opera House, Snowy Hydro and most of pre 1975 Sydney Major Infrastructure. Then after the boom was over the NSW (Newcastle-Sydney-Woolongong) government let the Riverina region for dead..

      One day finite resources like mining will be depleted and exhausted and a hungry urban area that has sucked all these rural and indigenous kids in like a vacuum cleaner will look to agriculture and other rural renewable food and resources to drive it again…but there will be so few people left in the rest of Australia, that will be hard after allowing it to stall to re-start again, and future Australian might look back in anger about how all this resource wealth was squandered by urban politicians continually putting re-election ahead of telling there urban electorate the cold hard truth, they have created an urban real estate bubble and continual urban population growth is totally unsustainable and stuffing up the nation as a whole.

      Inigenous Australians were spread out across this nation prior to our white invasion/colonisation in 1780 for a good reason….it made good logical sense ! ....it still does 200+ years later

    • Sherekahn says:

      10:01am | 27/05/10

      I am surprised, having seen an article in The Sunday Courier Mail, that someone hasn’t bombarded Jenny Macklin, Minister for Indigenous Affairs, with information about your Yurt Structures for Indigenous people who are crying out for new houses and only seven built so far! $millions has been set aside for them!

      I intend to do so myself.

      From the little I know so far, it would be great if your structures were light for easy transportation, (perhaps by air) avoiding wood, due to termites and the temptation to burn the wood.

      A while back I saw an American Science article about endangered Sea-horses off the Californian coast.  Some were captured and taken to a laboratory for study.  They were placed in a rectangular aquarium.  within days they were dead.

      Very much puzzled, they collected some more which were placed in a round goldfish bowl.  These all lived!

      My point is this.  There are very few corners in Nature that the Indigenous Australians have in their Psyche.  They seem unhappy in typical Aussie houses so try something new.
      It would be very useful and ground breaking if you, in the company of an Aboriginal-speaking Aussie anthropologist, travelled incognito, (without fanfare or fuss) among isolated communities to show and discuss with them designs THEY could be happy with.
      For instance, the inside walls or partitions could be just above head height.

      In 1967 I lived for a while in a small one at a Campsite not far from ST Tropez, while they were building the famous Cogolin village and marina.  These had thatched roofs and similar to a Hill’s clothes hoist, they could be raised and lowered.

      There are many people around the world living in houses untypical of western design, yet living a modern existence.  Watch SBS’s program, Global Village, to see many such people.

    • centurion48 says:

      10:05am | 27/05/10

      I agree with a lot of this article but if you delete all references to indigenous or aboriginal people and address it to all Australian people then it is a very similar argument. Most Australians don’t know what it is like to depend on welfare.
      The two factors that can change the circumstances of every disadvantaged Australian are health and education. A good dose of self-help wouldn’t go astray either but people have to believe they can improve their lot before they will be ready to help themselves. Education can show them that. A sense of community will follow.
      I see no hope for aboriginal people while they resist integration into the Australian community. It is unfair to insist on isolation, government support and self-determination. It might make the adults feel a bit better but it is condemning aboriginal children to the exact same fate.

    • Nathan says:

      11:17am | 27/05/10

      It sounds like an arguement for small government. The problem is, small government does not equal big money. The Australian public cannot have it both ways. Handouts come at the cost of empowerment.

    • Anthony says:

      11:26am | 27/05/10

      Aborigines who cast a vote in the Mcmillan electorate must hardly feel like they have much say and power. Look up on the internet what Mcmillan did to the Kurnai people and see why they may be cynical about our attempts to empower them.

    • Ben81 says:

      01:42pm | 27/05/10

      I hope you obtained permission and paid royalties for the use of the image of that copyrighted flag Mr Estens, or a certain artist might demand cash from you!

    • John A Neve says:

      03:47pm | 27/05/10

      Dick,
      I assume by “indgenous people”, you mean early Australian , I refuse to use a term incorrecly.
      But you are correct “fifty years ago people did manage our communities”, but that was fifty years ago. The world has moved on, in many cases not for the better. But that is another story.
      The community as we knew it has gone, we all live in a very fast world, where our every action impacts on our neighbours. You do not have a person making community decisions unless they have the ability. Token participation fixes nothing.
      It is a fact of life nothing stands still, early Australians have to accept, they move with the times, however bad they might be, or get left behind. If they want to hunt shoot and fish like the grandparents, so be it. But they cannot expect to have a foot in both camps.
      If there is no work, no school, no hospital etc, 500K’s from nowhere, they either move or accept the fact.
      I truly appreciate what you are trying to do, but remeber “God helps them, that help them selves”. Sadly, many early Australian won’t or can’t do that.

    • Eye4anEye says:

      05:58pm | 27/05/10

      I agree with John completly - If people want to live a traditional lifestyle and/or are reluctant to move due to cultural reasons then they have to truly live a traditional lifestyle building shelter and living in the traditional way. It is simply inefficient and a gross misuse of resources to build facilities so far out from urban centres for a handful of people when those resources could help so many more people.

      Will likely be crucified for this statement but if you want to increase abororiginal life expectancy and standard of living they need to assimilate into society - clinging to traditional ways is fine and if they want to do that I have no problem with it but clinging to traditional ways is what prevents them from enjoying longer lifespans and better standards of living because these (life expectancy and standard of living) are linked to a very non traditional way of life.

    • Chantel says:

      05:52pm | 27/05/10

      Perhaps the statistic of 1:22 to 1:6 has something to do with our aging population and pensioners, and also a greater diversity of benefits available. I don’t think you examined this statistic sufficiently.

    • eureka says:

      06:07pm | 27/05/10

      Its a widely touted but problematic idea to expect to grow a pool of young educated motivated etc etc people to find the solutions in the future ... if adults can’t find the way today then why would today’s youth stay in their community in the future and solve the problems when they too find themselves as adults in the thick of messy problems? Equal support and organisation needs to be available to help today’s adults alongside today’s youth, not as seperate cohorts.

      Education is crucial but it’s insufficient to “empower” people.  Empowerment is a troublesome notion. The adults of today need to be actively and tirelesslly demonstrating their principles and activism today if they expect the youth to do similar

    • Gary Cox says:

      09:28pm | 27/05/10

      But Dick if you take power away from bureaucrats and hand it to local councils or communities too many bureaucrats would lose their jobs and have to get a real job. Hits on facebook would halve instantly.

    • BTS says:

      05:15am | 28/05/10

      The choice of Local Police Commanders and Hospital staff in Queensland has not had ‘local community input’ for more than twenty years.

      It’s observable, historic fact, that if an Aboriginal Community is made up of more than one tribe, the elected tribe, holding power, distributes wealth disproportionately in favour of their tribe.  Their family’s infrastructure is improved, their family’s service is improved and the other tribes suffer.

      This is probably the major reason for government intervention.  Approval of spending is not based on who’s family hold current power.  It’s likely to be a more equitable distribution.  Your returning to local control, reignites this old issue.

    • slubbense says:

      10:36am | 14/12/12

      An intriguing discussion is worth comment. I think that you really should write additional on this topic, it might not be a taboo topic but typically people are not sufficient to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers

      <a >Youth NFL Jerseys</a>

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

@Cmdr_Hadfield @mattpturner Hope you have sweet views while you heal

Lucy Kippist

RT @HeatherSmithAU: Can living in another country change your life for the better? by @lucyjk on @newscomau f. moi http://t.co/E5Ma3kBut2

David Penberthy

@mooks83 sophisticated response. Think the kids parents saw it differently

David Penberthy

More class from 9's footy show, lampooning a baby that allegedly looks like Sterlo with a pic swiped from Facebook http://t.co/BGoYP6Pn68

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter