I am a huge fan of political truisms. Love them. Let me take you through a few.

Polling: you know it makes sense.

Red tape is always a bad thing. No matter that a lack of appropriate regulation caused the global financial crisis. Red tape is bad and must be disposed of. On the other hand, frontline services are always a good thing. Regardless of inefficiency or incompetence we simply can’t cut frontline staff.

A further example of unambiguous evil in the political realm is “polls”.

In political discussion, especially among the urban elite, the word “poll” is best said with disdain. Perhaps consider a slight sneer as your mouth spits out the opening “p”.

Most people understand polls pretty well because the major newspapers do their own regularly. So even worse than polls are their shadowy cousins “focus groups”. Jamie Briggs last week described the Labor Party “handing over its policy development to focus groups”. Sinister indeed.

Wrap polls and focus groups together and you have a truly disturbing combination.

Paul Keating said it well when he referred to “conservative tea-leaf-reading focus group driven polling types who I think led Kim [Beazley] into nothingness”. Ouch.

Accusations of being ‘poll driven’ aren’t new and they aren’t unique to Labor. John Howard was often accused of it.

When the inevitable questions about polls and focus groups come up, just once, I’d like Julia Gillard to take up the fight on the pollsters’ behalf.

“I do use polls and focus groups and I follow them closely,” I would like her to say.

“Polls are important because I can only speak to so many people, so they help me to understand the mood of Australia.

“That helps me both to shape the policies people want and to consider how best to persuade the public of the merits of my position”.

Once in a while the polls might make a political party reassess its position on a particular policy. There is nothing wrong with that. An issue on which John Howard seemed to ignore the polls was Workchoices and look where that got him.

However, no one seriously thinks that politicians blindly follow their pollster’s figures independent of their own values and priorities. A majority of Australians support the reintroduction of the death penalty, yet there is no suggestion of either party adopting this position.

More often, a political party will have a vision and an agenda to prosecute. Rather than changing this agenda, focus groups can be used to understand how to sell this vision to the electorate.

Slogans have taken some flak during this campaign, but communicating with the public is not just a way of winning elections, it’s an essential part of leading the country.

The power of persuasion is something which used to be deeply respected. Some of history’s greatest figures are revered for being able to use language to convince and cajole.  We may have lost some of the art of persuasion, but introducing a bit of science to that process is no bad thing.

Polls and focus groups are not intrinsically bad, it’s just that they are sometimes misused. In fact polls are probably a symbol of a thriving democracy. I imagine Kim Jong Il doesn’t bother with them much.

So during the campaign, do I expect to hear a politician sticking up for the pollsters?

Probably not. I doubt it would test well.

- Euan Robertson is a tea-leaf-reading focus group driven polling type (but not a conservative one) who has worked for two major polling organisations.

20 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Rosie says:

      07:19am | 05/08/10

      We all know how the Labor Party with the Unions Powers are captivated with the Polls. It is a matter of life and death for them. It now seems this election is all about the Polls for Labor and no subtance. They work around it, they were spooked when the polling results weren’t in their favour so they politically assissinated the nation’s elected PM and replaced him with their female Deputy PM. Australia had their first female PM and the Polls went up again in favour of Labor. Julia Gillard was enjoying a honeymoon period because when there is a change in PM it is a historic time for Australians. In this case we had not only that to celebrate but we had our first female PM. Our women folk were elated and Gillard had their vote, didn’t matter whether Gillard and the Labor Party could deliver anything, she was a female and they were going to vote for her.

      For the time being the political corpse of Kevin Rudd was discarded, no one knew what he was going to do and when he was going to resurrect from the dead. While Kevin Rudd was away seething and feeling sorry for himself, Julia Gillard’s Labor’s popularity did a dramatic drop in the Polls brought about by their stupidity, incompetency and the fake Julia becoming the real Julia to now the “Dithery Dillard.”

      “Dithery Dillard” is now so desperate, the polls are not in her favour and slowly her female voters are coming to their senses the Labor Party’s campaign becomes a smear campaign against her male opponent who has been showing positive signs of someone with Primeministership qualities.

      Then hey presto the dead corpse of Kevin Rudd awakens, doesn’t like what he sees and is all ready to join forces once again with “Dithery Dillard” so that the Polls are back in their favour before the 21st of August.

      The old Kevin07 is now the new Kevin 0 Ten, nothing much has really changed expect that it is more obvious he is a self selfing, very ambitious and someone that hogs the limelight and says he is back because he doesn’t want Tony Abbott to slide easily into a win by default. Hello! Mark Latham was right after all.

    • T.Chong says:

      07:58am | 05/08/10

      Rosie, we all know the Liberals with their mining execs union is poll driven - thats why the LNP is so grateful the mining ceos are putting on their ad campaign in order to influence the POLLS!
      Rosie, I hope we get good pix of Turnbull and Abbott together on stage, dont you?
      Maybe the serially undying loyal J Bishop will be there as well.
      After all she she has so solidly stood by all the past Lib leaders.

    • Macca says:

      08:31am | 05/08/10

      @T.Chong, feel free to continue with the drivel that poitical Mining Executives are the equivalent of the Trade Union Movement.

      It really is up there with the most ridiculous political statement I have ever heard. Even worse than the Labor mantra that “Abbott is unelectable”, that approach is going really well for them

    • T.Chong says:

      09:59am | 05/08/10

      Macca just clarify. If a group of employees get together to achieve common goals , it is a union? Yes?
      Why isnt a similar group of employers / magnates CEOs gathered together for a common purpose, also a union ? Call it a minerals concil, or whatever title you like, it is still a group gathered together for a common purpose.
      What is your problem with the word union?
      Or do you believe if big corporate players get together for a common purpose it must be good, and only if workers do the same, it must be feared?

    • James1 says:

      11:24am | 05/08/10

      Wow - I actually have to agree with T.Chong on this one.  Any interest group that organises in order to achieve what they see as a better deal for their members is the political equivalent of a union.  After all, they do the exact same thing.  Just because they want different things doesn’t mean they aren’t performing the same function.

      If they are different things Macca, please enlighten us as to why that is the case.

    • Moggy says:

      12:48pm | 05/08/10

      T.Chong after Blighs announcement this morning that breastfeeding mothers will be able to breast feed their babies at work in a lockable ‘breastfeeding room’ & not get docked ant money I can safely say that Labor are truly NUTS!! What employer will allow a worker to take her baby to work all day & every day? And who will look after the baby in between feeds while th emother is working? The Labor party is slowly destroying itself with these ideas that never seem to get thought out to the very end. And yes I know it’s a state policy & not a federal one!

    • Diamantina Dick says:

      08:11am | 05/08/10

      Kevin could be misguided in his renewed interest in seeing Labor re-elected, he could have more chance of a job under an Abbott Government. He may soon come to realise this and leaks will begin again!

    • Statistician says:

      08:44am | 05/08/10

      Euan, the real question is how accurate are polls and focus groups at predicting the behaviour of the larger population group. Imagine the disappointment of the South Australian Liberal Party after the pollsters said they would win at the last election (and they paid good money for this advice). Its important to promote your industry though, reinforces the notion that polls know what they are about.

    • Euan Robertson says:

      04:31pm | 08/08/10

      The published polls in Australia have a very good record in recent years. Sometimes one of the polls will be a bit out, but taken collectively they showed Rudd winning in 07 and Howard holding on in 04.

      In South Australia, the final Newspoll showed the Coalition with a 2PP of 52 per cent and they polled 51.6 per cent. That they didn’t win was because they didn’t pick up enough of this vote in the marginals - but the statewide Newspoll could not pick this up (indeed, was not designed for this purpose).

    • Cat says:

      08:50am | 05/08/10

      We were ‘phoned recently and asked to participate in a political poll. We declined. The following day the poll came out and there were just two categories, one Labor, one Coalition. There was no ‘declined’  or even ‘undecided’.  Just goes to show how wonderfully accurate these polls really are.

    • Rose says:

      12:21am | 06/08/10

      Well, obviously they only counted those who participated in the poll, not those that didn’t.

    • Euan Robertson says:

      04:35pm | 08/08/10

      Those that are unavailable, unwilling or undecided are excluded from the published polls. This effectively means that the polls assume that this cohort of the population will split in the same way as those that do participate. Not a perfect approach, but the polls over the past decade have been accurate enough to suggest it works ok (also the ‘undecided’ group declines as an election comes nearer).

    • Confused of Glenhuntly says:

      09:04am | 05/08/10

      OK, I’ll admit it - your upside-down graphic is too subtle a statement for me. Is it meant to mean that polls actually say the opposite of what the media / politicians want to think they do? Or what?

    • Euan Robertson says:

      04:36pm | 08/08/10

      Nothing to do with me - added by one of the graphics folk at The Punch. There is no hidden message and I would suggest you not take it too seriously - it gave me a giggle.

    • ibast says:

      09:34am | 05/08/10

      One thing that annoys me is when polls are published within a couple of days of a major change and any credence is put in them.  Most people haven’t fully processed a change in that period of time, so how can the polls mean anything.

      I also believe that when the Preferred Prime Minister and Two Party Preferred polls are significantly different, then you can’t take them to mean anything.  In the last few days before the election the two will become more aligned and only then will they mean anything.  It’s something that has happened every election since 1993.

    • Euan Robertson says:

      04:42pm | 08/08/10

      A good point, and really where the commentators earn their stripes. The polls immediately after the change to Gillard were very positive - suggesting that the public at least did not regard the move unfavourably. But a good commentator would have cautioned against reading too much into it. See for example, John Stirton from Nielsen’s comments- http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2010/s2950648.htm

      Also agree that voting intention should always be more important than preferred PM. But it is useful to see if the party is tracking ahead or behind the leader.

    • acotrel says:

      12:46pm | 05/08/10

      Tony Abbott - I note that in the Australian education system two thirds of students are taught in the public system yet only receive one third of the total available funding.  The other two thirds of the available funding goes to already wealthy private schools! I believe this state of affairs must brred the worst kind of elitism.  Even if one believes that kids from private schools, with help from theire parents,go on to build businesses which give the peasants jobs, you cannot deny the unfairness! To my mind it is just another form of the ‘Harvard Test’ in which kids are expected to achieve in the same way as the ir parents.  Of course schools such as Melbourne HIgh School, and MacRobertson HIgh School, prove that idea to be arrant nonsense!  The Liberal party is actively promoting this travesty, and are demanding guarantees that the ALP will not reduce funding in the future.  It’s clear that they will never govern for ALL Australians!

    • iansand says:

      02:47pm | 05/08/10

      Pure, unadulterated fantasy.

    • jg says:

      03:58pm | 05/08/10

      Ah, hate to break it to you, but States fund State schools, not the Commonwealth.

      The Commonwealth has a number of grants and funding agrteement s with the states to basically top up what the States can’t afford. The commonwealth has the same sorts of deals with private BGAs both catholic and independent.

      States do not pay any money whatsoever into private schools.

      And I should add that the attendance figure is very much 50/50 private public.

      So, if you want to rant about education, then at least know something about the subject, which you obviously don’t.

    • interloper says:

      03:53pm | 05/08/10

      How about an article on how much bad the media (and the parties?) interpretation of polls is. Lead story in the newspaper often is that polls have moved within the margin of error - which means, of course, that the premise of the story is completely wrong.
      For a US example of how one can treat polls if one had the time and money, look at http://www.fivethirtyeight.com. Now that’s relevant polling information

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter