The American architect, Philip Johnson, once said “all great architecture is the design of space that contains, cuddles, exalts, or stimulates the persons in that space.”

The reading room in the Victorian State Library. Picture: Peter Ward

A trip to the State Library in Melbourne bears testament to that. The glorious reading room, which at the time of its construction boasted one of the largest domes in Christendom, manages to exalt the entranced tourist while cuddle the engrossed researcher all at once.

Yet it is hard to feel cuddled by a building if you cannot get into it. And for millions of Australians with a disability the state of our public built environment prevents them entering or using the bathroom let alone feel stimulated or exalted by the wonder of the architecture.

Last Monday, an important step was taken to change all this.

The Rudd Government, through the agency of the Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research Kim Carr and the Attorney-General Robert McClelland, launched the Commonwealth’s new Premises Standards which will provide for greatly increased access for people with a disability to buildings in Australia.

Indeed Australia will now have a set of Premises Standards that are among the world’s best, and that will deliver a high level of accessibility at an affordable cost.

Both myself and the Parliamentary Secretary for Disabilities Bill Shorten had the privilege of participating in the launch along with Graham Innes, the Disability Discrimination Commissioner, before an audience consisting of the Patron of the International Day of People with Disability Thérèse Rein, the Chair of the Parliamentary Committee which recommended the adoption of the Premises Standards Mark Dreyfus, and with representatives from the disability movement and the construction and property sector.

Each group came to this launch with different perspectives. For the disability movement it was a long awaited recognition of the passive discrimination which they face as they live their lives among our nation’s buildings. For the construction and property sector the Premises Standards represent design certainty.

For all, this was a moment to celebrate, although given it has taken a decade to come to fruition, the festive mood at the launch was matched by a sense of sheer relief that the job had at last been done.

What has become clear in this process is that the construction and property sector, which is effectively charged by the Premises Standards with the responsibility of creating a more accessible built environment in Australia, recognises the importance of equity and social responsibility.

They also recognise that the Premises Standards will create new commercial opportunities as they promote innovation and the development of a built environment better suited to the needs of a diverse and ageing population.

For the Government’s part it has been mindful that like every part of industry the property sector operates within tight financial constraints. Accordingly the regulation contained in the Premises Standards is directed prospectively applying to new public buildings where designing for these standards can be done at minimal cost.

Above all, the Premises Standards will offer the greater certainty that the property industry has been looking for – certainty that new building work will comply with the Disability Discrimination Act, and the certainty to go ahead with new investment decisions.

The Premises Standards inevitably represent a balance between the interests of Australians with a disability and what the property sector can afford in building new constructions. There has been an enormous effort on the part of Government to reach consensus on each issue between these differing interests and by and large the Premises Standards is a product of consensus. But where that has been impossible, of course, the difficult decisions have been made.

Once the Premises Standards have been adopted by the Commonwealth Parliament, their technical requirements will be mirrored in the Building Code of Australia, which in turn will need to be referenced in State and Territory building regulations.

In this way the Premises Standards will exist both as regulations to the Disability Discrimination Act making new non-complying buildings unlawful; and as part of the Building Code of Australia which will ensure new buildings are constructed in a compliant way.

The replacement rate for buildings in Australia is about 2 per cent a year.

That means around a fifth of our building stock has been replaced since the process for the establishment of the Premises Standards started ten years ago – one building in five might be more accessible today had the Government then got its act together quicker.

That is why the Government has been so determined to avoid further delay and we are very proud to have delivered this important reform during our first term in office.

The Rudd Government is committed to meeting its responsibility to people with disabilities by ensuring at last that our built environment is properly and genuinely accessible. For millions of Australians the Premises Standards will literally see the building of a better future.

5 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Darryl says:

      08:28am | 19/03/10

      A couple of points arise from Mr. Marles article that deserve further mention;
      Disability access has been a mandatory requirment in the Building Code of Australia (BCA) from 1990, with these provisions strenghtened in the 1996 to present BCA, with the requirements applying to all classes of buildings with the exception of single dwellings or owner occupier home units. It is disingenuous for the claim to be made that had the ‘Government then got its act together quicker’ one in five buildings would be more accessible.
      Secondly, whilst acknowledging the need and rights for accessability of all people to all commercial buildings, one critical issue has not been adequately addressed in that standard, that of emergency escape. Whilst it is fine to provide lifts for access, all lifts are signed ‘in case of fire do not use lift’. What consideration has been given to evacuating non-ambulant disabled persons from multi-storey buildings in a fire event?

    • formersnag & disability worker says:

      09:25am | 19/03/10

      when building entrances are properly designed with wide gentle ramps, they are more accessible to “normal” people as well. They also make for, a more “grand” entrance.

      Same for toilets & bathrooms, we all get older.

      When you throw in the need for rain water tanks collecting the water from all roofs, grey water recycling, dry composting toilets, passive solar design to reduce the need for aircon.

      The entire building & construction industry has a long way to go. And all architects, civil engineers, town planers, property developers with them.

    • Sam Chowder says:

      05:50pm | 19/03/10

      Disability access to buildings is a Dalek plot

    • Eno says:

      08:52pm | 19/03/10

      I’m sorry but putting ramps into all buildings is unacceptable - or do you secretly want to help the Daleks to take over the world??

      Sorry - somewhat tongue in cheek. My only concern is that there are many older / historic buildings with corridors that were not designed wide enough to allow chairs and people to pass - let alone two chairs. Are there exceptions for buildings with that sort of problem in the regulations or are these buildings going to have to be devalued as a historical record?

    • Kitty says:

      10:53pm | 20/03/10

      Sam, don’t be stupid, we all know Daleks can levitate up stairs now.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

@joekiely an Irish ghost called a mist fairy comes on dark road and pushes you into the ditch. nothing to do with six pints

Paul Colgan

@joekiely @pjlogue @franksting @cowoods I love 100. The dead man was known to the Garda.

Paul Colgan

A history of Ireland in 100 excuses http://t.co/YK5tblI6 cc @pjlogue @franksting @cowoods

Paul Colgan

Wow the official Chewbacca website looks like it was designed by... a wookie http://t.co/SCTBVbVt

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Would you kill for a job?

Would you kill for a job?

Who would work in an abattoir? Most of us have done jobs we didn’t want to do because we needed…

Friday Dilemma: child cruelty or harmless fun?

Friday Dilemma: child cruelty or harmless fun?

Parenting. It’s the new oneupmanship. Ah, how quaint the days now seem when parents could raise…

Hipsters with hip replacements

Hipsters with hip replacements

Someone once told me that when people reach a certain age they begin dressing in the manner they did…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Punch on: Open thread 09/02/2012

marley says:

I'm one of the older ones, so I've certainly seen a few changes in my time. When I started school I learned to write with a nib pen, dipped in an inkwell (no, I'm not kidding). My mother became a dab hand at getting inkstains out of my clothes. Flicking ink at one another in the classroom was an essential… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

152 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter