Look! Up in the sky! Is it a bird? Is it a plane? Is it the coming carbon tax calamity? No! It’s Asteroid 2005 YU55!

The asteroid is made of strange square-like shapes… Pic: AFP PHOTO/NASA/JPL-Caltech

The 400m-wide rock (please let us know if you need this translated to Olympic swimming pool or football field units of measurement) will whiz by Earth today at a whopping 19km a second, a mere 324,600 km away. That’s closer than the friggin’ moon!

But don’t head for your swine-flu-resistant bunker, we’re going to be fine. Reassuringly, NASA says we’re not going to get smashed to bits by asteroids for 100 years. That means your bunker’s probably a good real estate investment, keep stockpiling that Spam!

Asteroids are very cool. Let us count the ways in which they are cool.

1. All those wispy-haired moonbats who believe that the movement of things in space affect their daily lives must be FREAKING OUT. Maybe when they realise that lumps of inert material far far away do not exert enough gravity to help them meet a dark-haired stranger they’ll realise the error of their Zodiac-loving ways. Or maybe not.

2. They now know some really nerdy details about what would happen if this specific asteroid actually hit Earth. Little old 2005 YU55 would create a 6.4km wide crater about 520 metres deep. It could cause 21-metre tsunami waves and shake the ground like a magnitude-7 earthquake. Woah.

3. Scientists know how to deflect an asteroid heading for Earth. According to this report, the B612 Foundation has worked out how to save us from the fate of the dinosaurs by smashing dem asteroids up, using a gravity tractor, or ‘Mirror bees’ and foil wrap. Hey if it’s got foil it’s gotta be true.

4. Scientists were also able to confirm that it does in fact look like a grey potato by pinging radio beams off it to create an image. See above.

5. Asteroids are not all the same. The European Space Agency last year discovered that the Lutetia asteroid was an ancient malformed baby planet,  a “primitive ‘mini-world’ that used to be round and may even have tried to grow a metal heart like a fully formed planet”. Awwww.

6. NASA has a whole section called Spaceguard to keep an eye on objects lurking dangerously close to Earth. And here’s a list of the things they’ve learned (ooh, a list within a list) – including the fact we should probably thank them for bringing us into existence.

That officially makes asteroids cooler than God.

117 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • VVS says:

      08:14am | 09/11/11

      But won’t Bruce Willis be dead in 100 years (assuming he’s not some sort of man-robot hybrid)?

      Who will save us then? Surely not Ben Affleck…

    • ZSRenn says:

      10:26am | 09/11/11

      Scoff if you will VVS but remember Sunday is the 11/11/11. this rock being here at 11:11 on that day is just too spooky. Me! I am heading for a bar with my 1.3 billion Chinese friends to discuss the ying and yang of it all.

      Most have forgotton they only started using a solar calender only a few decades ago and under the luner calender there is no significance at all. Hey but 1.3 billion can’t be wrong. Can they?

    • VVS says:

      10:44am | 09/11/11

      So you’re saying to make sure I get laid on Saturday night?

      Thanks for the advice, but it was already part of my plans anyway.

    • michelle says:

      10:50am | 09/11/11

      I think you’ll find Friday is the 11/11/11, however maybe I’m just following the georgian calender and on some other calender today is actually Friday, Which si great becasue I can have the next 2 days off

    • Enoklys says:

      02:52pm | 09/11/11

      Lest we forget…

    • ZSRenn says:

      03:00pm | 09/11/11

      @ Michelle You’re correct, sorry bloody Chinese made calender got me all mixed up!

      VVS you better bring that forward to Thursday night. I might go for the hat trick just in case.

    • Cynicised says:

      06:42pm | 09/11/11

      @VVS. Aah, doncha just love disaster porn? The cheesier the better!

    • stephen says:

      08:15am | 09/11/11

      Bob Brown has shaved his head, and is come to get us.
      (Where’s a missile when you need one ?)

    • TheBrad says:

      08:16am | 09/11/11

      Asteroids are cooler than Haemorrhoids

    • Danie says:

      08:16am | 09/11/11

      it’s lego asteriod

    • Anne71 says:

      12:18pm | 09/11/11

      No, it’s the Vogons, coming to demolish our planet to make way for the new interstellar bypass. Just make sure you know where your towel is, and remember - DON’T PANIC!

    • Eleanor says:

      08:20am | 09/11/11

      I’m kinda disappointed it missed. A meteor strike could be just the proverbial kick up the arse the entire world needs to pull its priorities back into line. Not to mention a good healthy cull.

    • dms says:

      08:55am | 09/11/11

      Please, nobody feed the troll

    • michelle says:

      09:21am | 09/11/11

      I don’t think eleanor is trolling it’s true. World debt crises, the new ipad, Earning $100K +  and planning your next overseas trip, retirement, house renovations, electronics purchases will all fade into oblivion if you are now in a position of having to search for new shelter and hunt for your food each day

    • amy says:

      10:03am | 09/11/11

      @Eleanor, well if you like the Idea of a cull then perhaps you should sign up to be first…or at least volunteer your freinds and famility for the honour

      @michelle and why the hell would that be a GOOD thing?....I would like to think we dont need some disaster to plan our lives for us

    • Eleanor says:

      10:29am | 09/11/11

      Amy - I’d take one for the team. It’d be kind of nice, knowing exactly how and when you’re going to cark it (albeit maybe in a firey/watery and violent way). I hope it’d strike on a beach, so I could die on the shore with a nice glass of wine.

    • amy says:

      10:57am | 09/11/11

      not everyone feels the same way…you know

    • cayal says:

      11:36am | 09/11/11

      I’m quite happy living a comfortable life and seeing the world. I will live once and I don’t plan on struggling to live it.
      If you want to be one of those ‘save the planet because humans are destroying it’ hippes, be my guest. Don’t make the rest of us suffer because of your ignorance.

    • HappyCynic says:

      11:53am | 09/11/11

      We’re doomed to extinction at some point in time anyway, why not make it quick and violent?

      The truth is we’ll probably just poison and starve and bomb ourselves slowly into extinction before any asteroid hits because we’re too lame a species to bother doing it properly.  I think it’s got something to with G-d deciding to end the world with a whimper instead of a bang, if only to prove those religious doomsayers like Camping wrong smile

    • cus says:

      11:59am | 09/11/11

      @michelle @eleanor

      why can i never meet women who think like you in real life. i have no trouble finding the amys.

    • Kika says:

      01:13pm | 09/11/11

      I am with Eleanor. Where’s the sign up list>?

    • PsychoHyena says:

      02:21pm | 09/11/11

      @Eleanor, unfortunately those who are currently prioritising making as much money as possible (that will likely go to the Government when they die because they don’t have heirs) will continue to do so even when the asteroid is in the atmosphere. They will be talking to business clients as the asteroid hits.

    • fml says:

      04:24pm | 09/11/11

      MIchelle, are you the type of person who watches the news and roots for the disaster to win?

    • Utopia Boy says:

      05:19pm | 09/11/11

      Would be nice if it crashed in say, the general area of the Middle East (while our troops were on R&R in London of course).

    • amy says:

      07:17pm | 09/11/11

      @cus

      you mean the “sane” ones?

      thats because the nutters are harder to spot in real life

    • Leah says:

      09:24pm | 09/11/11

      Amy, I actually think Eleanor’s as far from a nutter as you can get. Don’t worry, it’s not like I really agree with her (though I wouldn’t discourage a shake-up of the world’s priorities), but her thoughts are really pretty logical and not everyone feels or thinks the same way, so just because someone thinks differently to you doesn’t make them a ‘nutter’.

    • John in Alice says:

      11:01pm | 09/11/11

      I agree but suggest the real threat lies with solar flares/magnetic storms that will wipe out our electrical/power systems upon which man has become dependent on, as mankind’s natural aggression will force us to cull ourselves as we struggle for food, water and shelter.  There will be a weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth.  When the lights go out, how will you survive?

    • St. Michael says:

      12:02am | 10/11/11

      @ John in Alice:

      “When the lights go out, how will you survive?”

      Same procedure as one adopts for the zombie apocalypse: the higher gauge shotguns are more than adequate for this line of work.

    • Ben says:

      07:36am | 10/11/11

      More Eleanors and Michelle’s in the world please….
      Whats the bet that amy is a religious individual that wants everyone to “feel the same way” about what she believes in ?
      Bring on the priority re-adjustment - in any form…. and hopefully we can start letting darwinian theory assert itself again and end up with less politicians.

    • amy says:

      07:35pm | 11/11/11

      @Ben I am an athiest….or a “whatever”-ist

      I was under the impression that mass genocide of the human race was a bit crazy..thatsall

      @leah I generally consider myself a pretty logical person..I just have a porblem with other people suffering..you know?

    • Eleanor says:

      08:27pm | 13/11/11

      Amy - Like you, I also have a problem with people suffering. Especially because of the malice, greed, or general lack of sympathy by the rest of us. To my understanding, this strike wouldn’t wipe out all of humanity, but just enough for us to survive and re-evaluate what’s really important.

      And thus, true to humanity’s often hypocritical nature, it seems only fitting that the violent and painful deaths of millions of people would be what it takes to recreate society into something more benevolent.

    • Mahhrat says:

      08:20am | 09/11/11

      I reckon it wanted to stop ‘n say hi, realised what was going on down here, and is veering off at the last second just as fast as it’s little gravitons will take it.

      Seriously, closer than the moon.  That’s closer to Earth than a lot of recent policy decisions.

      There, but for the grace of physics.

    • Anne71 says:

      12:13pm | 09/11/11

      Yep, and we just have to hope that whoever calculated the trajectory remembered to carry the one wink

    • Erick says:

      08:21am | 09/11/11

      This illustrates one good reason we should be moving into space on a bigger scale. Asteroids have hit the Earth before, wiping out many species. Sooner or later, one will hit the Earth again.

      We should be in a position to prevent that. Space colonisation would not only enhance survival in the event of such a cataclysm, it would almost certainly guarantee that another hit would be prevented.

    • PJ says:

      09:28am | 09/11/11

      Unless the new planet we locate to has an Asteroid coming at it…..just saying.

      but I agree, we should start colonising space Doctor Who style (not a tardis, although that would be cool) it would solve overpopulation problems if we started spreading out rather than up, and we wouldn’t need to use up all a planets resources if we don’t all go to the same one

    • acotrel says:

      09:32am | 09/11/11

      @Erick
      If we had nuclear capability we could fit a uranium warhead to a missile, and blast it to smitheroonies ! Sounds like risk-free enterprise ?

    • MarkS says:

      10:52am | 09/11/11

      A hit by a nuke could just make things worse, a shotgun instead of a bullet.

      NASA says no worries for 100 years. Well yes by the big near earth asteroids that we know about. Could be that a large kuiper belt object miles wide that has just lately moved into an orbit with our name on it.

      If so Homo Saps are gone. One planet is a very fragile basket to hold all our eggs in. We need to get off this hicksville planet asap.

    • Brett says:

      01:38pm | 09/11/11

      @PJ - So we need to find a space whale then like New Britain? Or hitch a ride with another species?

    • Erick says:

      01:42pm | 09/11/11

      @acotrel - At least we can always rely on you for uninformed comment. As MarkS points out, sending a nuclear weapon at an asteroid is not a good idea.

      As I implied above, there are a number of realistic ways to prevent an asteroid impact, none of which rely on your naive idea of “blasting it to smitheroonies”. The most practical ones involve minor course changes over a long period before impact.

      All of this, of course will only be possible with more investment in space exploration, and will become relatively easy if we invest in space colonisation.

      @PJ - Who said anything abut a planet? Or relocation, for that matter?

      Of course the colonisation of Mars or the Moon is an interesting idea, but we could just as easily colonise space itself. Who needs a planet when the asteroids are full of resources, and empty space is full of energy?

      Also, colonising a new place doesn’t mean abandoning the old one.

    • PJ says:

      01:47pm | 09/11/11

      @Brett - space whale would be a cool way to travel but I don’t think there’s many left, hitching a ride is also a good idea but we tend to freak about new and different things so we’d be more likely to lock them up and experiment on them. all we need to do is focus our energy in building space craft that can go further than this solar system, it won’t happen in our lifetime but it could be just around the corner, the next great human empire, New, New York being served by the Oods.

    • nihonin says:

      02:00pm | 09/11/11

      Erick says:

      02:42pm | 09/11/11

      @acotrel - At least we can always rely on you for uninformed comment.

      Erick, you can’t say that about acotrel, he’s a scientist, don’t ya know.

    • PJ says:

      02:11pm | 09/11/11

      @Erik - where did I say 1 planet? go to many, spread out among the stars, go forth into the greater universe and do alien chicks, maybe they will restore your faith in women as the feminist movement hasn’t reached space yet that I know of

    • Nick says:

      03:16pm | 09/11/11

      I agree with Erick about increasing space readiness. Half way between the Earth and the Moon IS TO FREAKING CLOSE!!!

      I mean jez, what if some unknown quantity had an impact on the trajectory at the last moment. Despite what you think you know about the capabilities of the evil American Empire, there is no way they could have deployed a solution at a moments notice. And real world nukes point towards continents along a parabolic arc… not high altitude outer space…

      For all the whinging scientists do about climate change in a 100 years, not one of them campaigned on this matter, which could have wiped us out, well, yesterday. People really are stupid.

    • acotrel says:

      04:18pm | 09/11/11

      ‘@acotrel - At least we can always rely on you for uninformed comment.

      Erick, you can’t say that about acotrel, he’s a scientist, don’t ya know. ‘

      I’m not a Rhodes Scholar !

    • Randy says:

      06:38pm | 09/11/11

      I’d like to colonise Uranus

    • mick says:

      08:27am | 09/11/11

      Asteroids rock.

    • VVS says:

      08:54am | 09/11/11

      I see what you did there… and I like it.

    • Steve Perry says:

      09:21am | 09/11/11

      Bam!!!

    • JS says:

      12:54pm | 09/11/11

      I don’t get it.

    • VVS says:

      01:56pm | 09/11/11

      @ JS - ask your mum. She gets it all the time

    • JS says:

      02:53pm | 09/11/11

      @VVS - I decided to ask my Dad instead. he doesn’t get it either ????

    • Mouse says:

      03:27pm | 09/11/11

      @JS, lol, Dad’s never do!!

    • St. Michael says:

      04:44pm | 09/11/11

      You should never take asteroids for granite.

    • skepdad says:

      07:33pm | 09/11/11

      I’ve never metamorphic’kle bunch of people. Maybe this will shake us out of our sed(im)entary lifestyles.

      +10 internets to whomever can pun “igneous”.

    • NESLIHAN KUROSAWA says:

      08:36am | 09/11/11

      Hi Tory,

      Thanks for all that information about asteroids, since we really & truly have respect for your judgment & expertise in all interesting things.  Could you also let us know where it is heading exactly?? So that we could all take precautions to protect ourselves from the imminent danger.

      Surely, it will not be the end of the world as we know, hopefully!!  Have you also thought about the delicate balance in our universe & far away galaxies, Right now there might be some kind of unbalanced activities surrounding us.  And may be, may be in all honesty God is trying to tell us something!!  Best regards to your editors.

    • Jono says:

      09:20pm | 09/11/11

      I think God’s heart lurches at the fact that humanity still hasn’t changed in its ways since the tower of Babel… it’s such an extravegant thing God’s wrath was instead poured out on Christ all those years ago - which is something the majority of these doomsday nuts forget to remember.

      I fail to see how this makes Asteroids cooler than God though? If God created the universe, including Asteroids, and God’s creation was meant to reflect God’s glory… Asteroids being only a tiny spec in the midst of the greatness of the universe only add to God’s coolness! raspberry

      Perhaps if God is saying anything at all, its to remind us that for all our achievements and human glories, ultimately it could all come to an abrupt end in the blink of an eye completely out of our control…

      However, for the time being, God has the grace and mercy to let us continue on in our folly, in the hope that one day we might actually have an epiphany and realise we exist to need each other and God; to display the wonder and glory of the love and magnificence of God whom we exist by, through, and for!

    • Chris L says:

      10:23pm | 09/11/11

      There’s one possibility I’ve heard in some documentary or other that life here was due to microbes being brought here by an errant asteroid…. which, if true, would mean our creator was an asteroid!!! All hail the mighty rock!

    • Peachy says:

      08:58am | 09/11/11

      It’s not always the hit that’s the problem, it’s the skim that takes some of the atmosphere with it…just saying

    • Grandma says:

      09:32am | 09/11/11

      Does this mean I can play my favourite Aerosmith song all day?

    • Ray Rivers says:

      09:36am | 09/11/11

      Quickly bung a tax on it Julia that should stop it.You can save the Planet again.

    • Tom says:

      10:29am | 09/11/11

      Don’t give them ideas, Ray.

    • Blind Freddy says:

      01:01pm | 09/11/11

      Or, Tony could pray to his “friend” in the sky.

    • P. Darvio says:

      09:45am | 09/11/11

      Maybe the Chinese Manned Space Program can save us…as Obama cancelled the US Manned Space Program (although the US Congress has approved a token program that will probably go no-where) and Obama is starving NASA of other funding.

      If that Asteroid had hit the CBD of Sydney it would have wiped out the whole Sydney Basin, Newcastle and Wollongong and maybe even Canberra…...and what leads the TV news yesterday evening….Michael Jackson…...

    • perdix says:

      11:57am | 09/11/11

      but it didn’t hit, not going to hit, and if it did hit, MJ would be the least of our worries!
      Kinda agree that the priorities of our journalists is a bit off the mark though!

    • Stodge says:

      09:48am | 09/11/11

      Ay least Canberra will be safe. Nothing remotely interesting happens there ever.

    • Ray says:

      10:01am | 09/11/11

      ROFL +1

    • Macca says:

      09:59am | 09/11/11

      “Mirror bees’ and foil wrap. Hey if it’s got foil it’s gotta be true.”

      Everyone knows that Gaffer Tape and WD40 solves every problem. And if it’s not solved, you’re just not using enough

    • Anna C says:

      10:13am | 09/11/11

      What would MacGyver do?

    • PTom says:

      10:26am | 09/11/11

      Tory,
      But this is the new great carbon threat, which we must take action on it could hit the earth in over 100 years.

    • stu says:

      10:32am | 09/11/11

      Any chance we can get some precious metals outta that bad boy. Im sure all the mining magnates have considered this today. BTW i love how the news update on the potentially earth destroying asteroid has rated behind the celebrity apprentice scandal

    • Darren says:

      12:04pm | 09/11/11

      Obviously not enough Electrolytes in that floating rock huh.

    • Go Bruce says:

      11:14am | 09/11/11

      We should fire Bruce Willis into it and he can head-butt it out of the way.

    • Joel B1 says:

      11:51am | 09/11/11

      I’ve been really liking your work of late Tory.

    • Warwick says:

      12:06pm | 09/11/11

      Hi Tory,

      Please use the colour photo on the news.com link rather than the b&w profile one on Punch. I didn’t realise how much of a spunk you are.

    • iansand says:

      12:07pm | 09/11/11

      It is a pity that someone decided not fund the Australian contribution to Spaceguard (the international search for planet threatening asteroids).

    • cus says:

      12:18pm | 09/11/11

      punch commentators are so much more interesting than the abcers.

    • Aphrodite says:

      12:34pm | 09/11/11

      Toryyy.. you look fabulous in your pic on News.com.au home page… You go girl wink

    • newstainment says:

      12:35pm | 09/11/11

      This is tiny and would barely put a dent in the earth even if it was hit.. Although big ones are rarer; as gamblers would know, chance is a dangerous thing. Statistically speaking tho it’s not likely for at least a few hundred - thousand years.

      The most likely extinction threat we face is disease, and that threat is greatly multiplied by corporations mutating genes for profit. Something like this on an extreme level could wipe out the whole world just as quick.

    • Wayne Kerr says:

      01:18pm | 09/11/11

      especially if we all turn into flesh eating zombies

    • newstainment says:

      02:02pm | 09/11/11

      I know Hollywood has turned the idea into that but let me tell you the true story is one of sickening disease that could kill people within hours or a debilitating few months.
      Genes are mutating every second and it’s a matter of when not if a disease picks up a dangerous mutation; most likely created by big pharmaceuticals.

    • newstainment says:

      02:02pm | 09/11/11

      I know Hollywood has turned the idea into that but let me tell you the true story is one of sickening disease that could kill people within hours or a debilitating few months.
      Genes are mutating every second and it’s a matter of when not if a disease picks up a dangerous mutation; most likely created by big pharmaceuticals.

    • Petersham paradise says:

      03:44pm | 09/11/11

      Are you kidding? It would hit earth at 40,000 mph and even if it did lose half its mass and diameter in the burn out on the way down, when it struck it would make Petersham look like a paradise.

    • A believer in the truth says:

      01:09pm | 09/11/11

      God made the asteroid! How could it be cooler than Him!

    • Gomez12 says:

      04:07pm | 09/11/11

      Can’t help but ask.

      Which God?

    • Bob says:

      01:22pm | 09/11/11

      An asteroid impact did not wipe out the dinosaurs.

    • Brown says:

      01:37pm | 09/11/11

      ...they carbon taxed themselves to death.

    • St. Michael says:

      03:04pm | 09/11/11

      No indeed, while Bob Katter still lives the dinosaur species is not wholly extinct.

    • Timinane says:

      04:26pm | 09/11/11

      Correct, birds are descended from dinosaurs.

      Though the K-T boundary event 69 million years ago did help cause the extinction of many species of dinosaurs even if we do eat their descendents for dinner.

    • Alex says:

      01:28pm | 09/11/11

      You’re article is brilliant - all except for the last sentence. Why bring anti-God sentiment into it? Pretty sad that you feel you need to stoop to that level to write a ‘good’ article.

    • John says:

      01:39pm | 09/11/11

      Why does monotheism need to bring anti anti-god sentiment into almost every sentence in its dogma? Pretty sad religion needs to stoop to endless ad hominem and fallacies from force when testable explanations were what we required all along…

    • Trent says:

      01:49pm | 09/11/11

      I require measurements in ABLs (Average Brontosaures Lengths). Thanks.

    • Jay says:

      02:01pm | 09/11/11

      7) They exist.

    • Grandma says:

      02:21pm | 09/11/11

      If it’s going to hit us, can a little bit hit my roof please. Then the i surance would pay for it instead of me.

    • Ian1 says:

      02:26pm | 09/11/11

      Ahh, we welcome the harbinger of doom to our orbital locale.  Having recently been televised on Chinese TV as a ‘second’ sun (in appearance only), and of Hopi prophetic infamy.
      It’s not this one (also known as Elinin) to be wary of apparently, but the Sumerian ‘Nibiru’ which is not far behind?  Or is it…

    • St. Michael says:

      03:03pm | 09/11/11

      Dude ... generation ship!

      Get a couple of rocket boosters up there on that bad boy, bring it into earth orbit.  Hollow the sucker out on the inside, refit with habitation domes, and off we go to Alpha Centauri!

    • GD says:

      03:22pm | 09/11/11

      Chuck Norris is going to kick ass the asteroid out into space and save us all smile

    • Fred says:

      03:37pm | 09/11/11

      “thank them for bringing us into existence.

      That officially makes asteroids cooler than God. “

      R U KIDDING ME
      Good work “Tory” you’ve shown your lack of insight and reasoning.

      Watch your mouth when mentioning the name ‘God’ you silly little brainless monkey.

    • LauraBoBaura says:

      03:51pm | 09/11/11

      Watch your mouth when mentioning God, but not when addressing people it would seem.

      How Christian of you….

    • Gomez12 says:

      04:10pm | 09/11/11

      Small point - ‘God’ isn’t a name.

      But I like the endorsement of evolution inherent in calling someone a monkey. Well done.

    • Randy says:

      06:43pm | 09/11/11

      Well Asteriods exist, whilst the same cannot be said for ‘god’.  That makes them way cooler in my book.

    • Leah says:

      09:14pm | 09/11/11

      LauraBoBaura - nice how you assume that anybody who holds any respect for the word ‘God’ must be Christian.

      Gomez12 - actually, ‘God’ is a name in a few religions. In Christianity, their god is called God (among other names). In Islam, their god is called Allah, which is just Arabic for God (so Arab Christians refer to their god as ‘Allah’ as well). So… yes, ‘God’ is a name in several contexts.

    • skepdad says:

      11:45pm | 09/11/11

      Aw Fred that’s adorable. You stick up for your imaginary friend, there’s a good indoctrinated mind slave. *pat*

    • LauraBoBaura says:

      10:44am | 10/11/11

      Leah - I thought it was a fair assumption considering the vitriol of Fred’s response. Let’s call it an educated guess and not an assumption.
      I understand that not only Christians have respect for the word god, but I doubt somebody who was not a Christian would respond with the same amount of venom for Tory’s comment.

      Methinks the lady doth protest too much..

    • Gomez12 says:

      03:55pm | 09/11/11

      I for one welcome our new asteroid overlords…

    • Sanchez says:

      07:20pm | 09/11/11

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of asteroids…..

    • michael j says:

      07:12pm | 09/11/11

      ok 400 mts wide ,didn’t help , how deep and how high,no that was a long time ago n a shit movie, unless you mean 400 cubic meters , wish i could afford a telescope,,,

    • Leah says:

      09:09pm | 09/11/11

      I’m sorry, but what does ANY of that have to do with God and his coolness or lack thereof?

      Talk about off-topic tangent.

    • skepdad says:

      10:18pm | 09/11/11

      Pro God troll, Tory.

    • John in Alice says:

      10:51pm | 09/11/11

      Another pathetic excuse for an athiest rant!  Expect more as it gets closer to Christmas.  Do people actually get paid to spew this stuff?  Curiously, I’ve never heard of an athiest insisting they work through any religious holidays while they ridicule the reasoning for the days off.  Instead of writing wasted criticism of religious why aren’t these professional authors explore real problems with research and facts, like how after collecting carbon taxes from our citizens our government is going to magically reduce the carbon dioxide in our atmosphere?

    • Unionist says:

      04:19am | 10/11/11

      This is where typical dickwad neo-abbott lovers get it wrong and again we see them making crap up. Here is the go lil johnny coz it’s plain to see you dont get it. The ALP has NEVER said the carbon tax will reduce the carbon dioxide in our atmosphere as you lot always rant on about. It’s about reducing our countries output of carbon emissions. There is a BIG difference there but you are too stupid to figure that one out you pathetic imaginary friend believing troll.

    • Ian1 says:

      07:59am | 10/11/11

      @Unionist -
      ” The proportion of employees who were trade union members in their main job decreased from 20% in August 2009 to 18% in August 2010. This represents 1.8 million trade union members in their main job, a fall of 47,300 from the previous year, according to figures released today by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). “

      Why don’t you pick on someone your own size…  Representing only 18% of the working population you may as well just take on the ALP.  Oh, that’s you.

    • Unionist says:

      09:34am | 10/11/11

      @Ian1,

      People like you who like to quote statistics on unions always amuse me. You would be the first to squeal like a stuck pig if any of those hard fought workplace concessions by unions were taken away… no toilet break, morning and afternoon smoko, wow! 40 hr week, an 8 hr day, overtime pay, holiday breaks with loading…etc…etc… and the list goes on. If this stuff really makes you angry then by all mean go to your employer and ask for them to be removed. Otherwise stop complaining about unions. Unions only get involved when their members ask them to. This is most PROBABLY because their employer is trying to screw them. What part of that don’t you get? Are you saying these workers are NOT allowed to complain they should just take it on the chin and let you go about you daily lives? And if you are as an employer getting curry from three different unionsthen maybe there is something rotten going on for your workers.

    • Jono says:

      10:22am | 10/11/11

      @ Unionist - Agreed, well said

    • TimB says:

      10:37am | 10/11/11

      Unionist, all of those things are now enshrined by government legislation. (well except the bit about the smoko that’s hardly a necessary workplace concession).  The unions have done their jobs.

      If the unions disappeared tomorrow, we wouldn’t revert to slavery like you seem to imply. Those conditions would continue to exist. Unions need to show their relevance *today* instead of harping on about things they did long ago.

      And there’s nothing going wrong at Qantas. Their staff get better deals than those employed by the competition. The unions are just being greedy and unreasonable.

      ...Why is there union talk in this topic anyway?

    • Unionist says:

      11:40am | 10/11/11

      TimB says:11:37am; ummmm protesting about an iconic Australian brand downsizing it’s Australian workforce so it can move overseas. 1000+ jobs will be lost and probably 1000’s more indirectly in the local industry that services those workers. Interesting to see you ranting for that now Tim, one can only imagine the spin coming out of you if Gillard proposed the same thing. And as Fair Work Australia said it was Qantas’s action that would have led pressure on the economy not the unions industral action. Relevance you say! just one word for this week son ‘Qantas’. As for the off topic union chatter I didn’t start it. and the truth be known my handle has nothing to do with unions I"M INTO RUGBY UNION. I am not a current union member but definitely a trade union man born and breed. Nor have I ever voted in an election for any party. Unions have a place in this country they always have and they always will if they to leave you, me and every other workers rights will
      be slowly eroded over time. We will become corporate canon fodder.
      If it was for unions we may still have Work Choices…. that an interesting tool to get rid of ‘all of those things are now enshrined by government legislation’ not for long if the Liberals get a hold of it.

    • Jay says:

      02:46pm | 10/11/11

      Ugh. @Unionist - ask some Europeans about the long term effects of very powerful unions. I think you’ll find they include high long term unemployment in those countries plus flow on effects, among much else. Better yet; just look at the state of their economies (bar Germany). Unions have a role… but it is by necessity a small one. They are outdated and no longer have much viable use.

    • Unionist says:

      03:27pm | 10/11/11

      Jay… we’ve had unions for well over 100 years in this country and our unemployment rate is what??? (btw those three aren’t question marks they’re my left ear). I think there is a stark difference in the way eastern bloc unions work to what we have here in Australia. Now on your opinion unions aren’t much use…. as mentioned previously only 1.8 million people are active union members tell me a political party that has a similar membership level… how many people are members of the Liberal party… and why is it that rAbbott can rant on under pretext of speaking for all Australians where the Liberal party’s membership numbers represent a very small slice of the population. If he actually got the numbers to form government at the last election he may have some very slim merit in that stance. But the reality is he is a wanker, a non-achiever, can’t negotiate out of a paper bag and would be a BS PM.

      Another relevance of unions is today we see finally the community service sector union has made gains in pay equality for its workers. And you say unions are yesteryear… you idiots have no idea.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter