When it comes to reality TV, this much we know: Facebook death threats and Twitter hate campaigns are very good for ratings.

Greens means Hines

Just check the huge numbers hauled in by all the mass-hating on Deni Hines, reluctant anti-hero of what could well have passed by as just a paler Aussie version of one more American import, Celebrity Apprentice.

Whether it was for her so-called “bullying” of fellow contestant, Polly, her brittle ego (bristling at being offered advice), or her diva antics (refusing to sing for her team’s KFC campaign because she is a vegetarian), Hines is so detested by the Twittersphere she confessed this week to being “the most hated person on TV”.

Deni says she doesn’t like it, of course, and who would. But could she really be surprised? Having landed in Australia in 2001, the first year of the of the increasingly hideous Big Brother series, reality TV has been a fact of viewing life for a decade. You’d think by now we’d know the rules.

For the producers, Rule Number One is look as hard as it takes to cast a bunch of clashing personalities.

Include at least one whose ego is so humongous, or their delusions (about their ability to out-smart the conflict-loving and weakness-revealing formula) so grand, or their naivete about what these shows expose you to so thick that they’ll happily go on, be themselves, and fire up the punters. That is, make sure you have someone you’re pretty sure could take a nasty fall, then just sit back and rake in the tweets.

Because with enough hate, you too can watch a show featuring no bigger name than comedian Julia Morris give a hiding on finale night to a much-loved mega star like our Kylie, whose 1.45 million bums on couches for her X Factor singalong was trumped by Apprentice‘s 1.6m.

Most interesting to watch has been how Twitter has become as much of a godsend for reality producers as it has a curse for unwary, unwise or unlucky participants.

As everyday folks flock to it in their millions, tweeting is changing the way we consume TV even more than TiVo.

One gives you the power to turn back time, but the other lets you to connect with the mood of the nation in real time and have an impact on the short and long-term destiny of the program, and everybody on it. Who needs to phone a voter line when you can tap out a tweet that, if it’s clever enough, will give you hundreds of times the bang for your feed-back buck.

What started as a Q & A tweet-club has this year spread across pretty much any program with an ounce of controversy; from The Slap to Hamish and Andy’s Gap Year (monstered).

What (incredibly) people like Hines may not have taken in is that for every burst of less than loveliness they fire off on screen - every bit of shameless self-promotion, venal competitiveness or just plain bitchery - an army of ordinary people is primed and ready with a ballistic missile’s worth of tweets to fire back. And for civilians, they’re a surprisingly good shots.

And though the ratings-boosting Hines-scorn was particularly harsh, she’s only the latest in a well-established trend, one she should have been aware of. Remember the online beating administered in June to awful Raquel Moore, self-confessed racist and anti-star of Go Back to Where You Came From?

Moore’s haters were energetic enough to make Raquel a world-wide Twitter trend, and the show became a blockbuster for the normally niche broadcaster, SBS.

Others to feel sting this year include teenaged Australia’s Got Talent contestant, Jack Vigden, pilloried for claiming he’d written a song that in fact he’d had some help with, and “loudmouth” Tasmanian My Kitchen Rules contestant, Melanie Maddock, bollocked for being generally dislikeable.

More bizarre was the slag-fest on happy Danni Venn from MasterChef; seemingly for nothing worse than staying positive.

For anyone silly or ambitious enough to venture onto reality TV, this last example should set off the loudest bells of all. It’s proof that just as the thrill of the cameras can amplify, and possibly distort the “real you”, so jumping on a Twitter frenzy can prompt the erstwhile reasonable punter, tapping away with a vino on the couch, into putting up stuff on the world-wide screen they may very well cringe over in the morning.

Too late though. What goes online stays online, and as Hines has discovered, there is nothing virtual about it.

So here’s a memo to would-be reality celebrities: unless you’re certain you’re so loveable that you’ll never be the flash-point for this kind of immolation, stay out of the TV kitchen… even dear old MasterChef’s.

Most commented

22 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Gary Cox says:

      05:34am | 25/11/11

      I reckon The Mole was the first reality TV show in Aus. Was it on in 2000?

    • TChong says:

      06:56am | 25/11/11

      I thought it was Sylvania Waters.
      Though it was probaly Lancelot Link and the Secret Chimps.

    • Reggieman says:

      04:00pm | 25/11/11

      It was definitely Sylvania Waters. I grew up in Sylvania Waters and knew the Donahers

    • Bill says:

      06:45pm | 25/11/11

      What is Silvania waters?

    • Mahhrat says:

      05:35am | 25/11/11

      All this is just proof that we love to hate.  It’s kinda sad.

    • dancan says:

      11:31am | 25/11/11

      Or we’ve all become so jaded with reality tv and know it’s all a farce, so when the producers or a contestant attempt to trump up a role to get that emotive reaction we now slap them back down to where they belong.

    • Marhat Macoat says:

      02:39pm | 25/11/11

      Dont worry Mahhrat,its all contrived crap anyway,even more pathetic are the morons who follow and believe it

    • Torkona says:

      06:48am | 25/11/11

      I choose not to watch crap like this.  I enjoy watching other quality television programs such as Jackass .

    • Dave says:

      07:55am | 25/11/11

      Such stimulation!!!

    • marley says:

      07:25am | 25/11/11

      Who are all these people?

    • mick says:

      07:52am | 25/11/11

      I saw but 5 minutes of miss Deni Hines.  Miss precocious I venture to say.  What a handful Deni must be in private life. 

      As these types of reality shows irk me and as I find these types of individuals hard to come at I did the only thing possible….channel surfed.  Asta la vista beby!!

    • Micky G says:

      10:05am | 25/11/11

      I think we are setting ourselves up for a future “boring Australia”...Every person with character who actually says what they think gets immediately hammered by the public until they come out and apologise with the result that they never say anything interesting again. Remember when Tiger Woods told a reporter that he played “like a spaz”...The media jumped on about everyone being offended, Tiger apologised and now every interview he gives is the same. I used to love watching Joh Bjelke give an interview. It was always entertaining whether you agreed with him or not. Now all our politicians are so beige that they put you to sleep every time they give an interview. Cmon Australia, lets get some character back into us. Bring back the likes of Joh, Warwick Capper, Paul Keating, Ian Chappell, John McEnroe (yes I know he’s not Australian). I dont like all these people, but they were at least interesting to watch…

    • Wilma J Craig says:

      10:37am | 25/11/11

      Why do people watch those ghastly ” reality shows”?
      All so contrived. Winners pre-selected - particularly one where one of the judges (male) quite obviously had ” the hots’ for one of the youngsters (also male)!!

    • n_dude says:

      11:49am | 25/11/11

      It’s just entertainment. I suspect people enjoy loving and hating someone on a show and when that person is real and being themselves, I guess it makes it even more interesting for some.

    • Mumma4 says:

      04:09pm | 26/11/11

      I don’t think we can say all reality shows are contrived or the winners pre-selected. My son was on Four Weddings, and none of the four couples knew the winner right until the end. Of course the show was then edited accordingly, to make the winner seem like the sweet girl, two of them the ‘bitchy’ girls and the other the contry bumpkin. Having met all four brides, I can say they were nice girls, who said as much nice stuff about each other as they did mean stuff, but of course nice doesn’t make ratings. The tweets and facebook comments during and after the show were fairly horrendous, those girls were called ugly,slags, dogs, you name it they copped it. I know they put themselves out there but I think facebook and twitter give voice to alot of keyboard warriors who wouldnt otherwise be brave enough to be so insulting if it were a face to face scenario.

    • Cyn says:

      10:47am | 25/11/11

      It certainly is a time when you’d hardly venture outside for fear of someone tweeting about it!

    • Farken says:

      11:08am | 25/11/11

      um who is deni hines!

    • Cynicised says:

      12:59pm | 25/11/11

      Reality programs used to be fun and shock horror! every once in a while unconvered some truly deserving talent. Unfortunately or fortunately, depending on your point of view, the genre was bound to burn itself out when the formulae became glaringly obvious and the “talent pool” - read fools willing to take an almighty gamble with their reps, sanctioned by the producers - began to dry up. Now, they are eating themselves alive, cannibalizing themselves, never mind the Tweeps (folk who use Twitter) dishing the dirt. 

      Said dirt on social media sites can be unrelentingly vicious,and I agree, Wendy, deadly accurate. I totally concur with your article’s conclusion: unless you have a hide like an elephant or are capable of selective blindness, don’t venture anywhere near a reality program as a contestant (read sacrificial lamb). Or if you are determined to have that shot at instant fame/ notoriety  for gawd’s sake come loaded for bear in the protective armor stakes!! However if the wise amongst the potentials heed this warning, they will be  ensuring the demise of the genre in the not too distant future, when folks FINALLY wise up that the benefits accrue to the very few, the TALENTED few who acually deserve it and the opprobrium  generally settles on the also rans or the deadset fakes, or just who happens to piss off enough people on any given occasion! In other words, it’s the modern equivalent of the Coleseum!

    • Rachel Laurel says:

      01:03pm | 25/11/11

      Cartoons have more reality than Reality TV
      Television’s “Parliamentary Question Time ”  is Reality Television go mad!
      It lacks reality.

    • E Fermi says:

      04:06pm | 25/11/11

      It’s a pity. I used to think of Deni Hines as the sweet little thing who sang for the one-hit wonders the Rockmelons. After watching some of CAA I have seen what an egotistic, arrogant and spiteful little person she really is. The Rockmelon song now doesn’t sound so good anymore.

      On another thing - the show seemed to be one big promotion for Bouris’s business (I won’t mention it as I think it got way too many mentions). For a person with the charisma and TV presence of a wooden board, he got the best deal out of the series.

    • BrackBits says:

      04:15pm | 25/11/11

      For ages TV programs have had the “hated” person and the “nice” one. It’s been the staple of talent shows for years. All that has happened is twitter has invited people to make comments. You would be a bit stupid to go on one of these programs and not know the producers are going to play up every small act as a major drama, and forcing participants into either the hero or villain role.

      The saddest part about this is that now “news” sites are picking up one or two twitter comments and making whole articles about it, as though a few ranting tweeters represent the majority of viewers.

      Please explain to us why Marcia’s daughter is an anti-hero, assuming you know what the word means?

    • In the Genes says:

      10:49pm | 26/11/11

      why do we ‘hate’ these annoying reality celebs? There’s a pretty good evolutionary explanation. Not that anyone probably cares but here goes…

      Our ancestors evolved in-group/out-group biases, that most likely arose from war (it paid to band together with your own and not trust outsiders). This led to altruistic/prosocial behaviours directed toward kin & those in our group but came with both rejection of the out-group and some serious ‘cheater detection mechanisms’. We are wired to spot and punish the exploiter (i.e. those who dont play fair and are likely-to-not-reciprocate favours). Thus, today when we are faced (in our lounges) with these ‘unlikeables’, we react rather strongly, as if they were part of our in-group and we’ve just detected a cheater that needs to be punished - or a member of the out-group. Either way, its ‘normal’ behaviour albeit maladaptive given today’s technology. Evolution needs some time to catch up with reality TV.

      and that was my (most likely useless) essay for the evening.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

RT @CrawfordFund: @farrm51 u may like 2 help spread word of our #foodsecurity journo award http://t.co/FwbMWwJmLf

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @adamroy37: Just received a phone call from a young girl apologizing for her actions. Lets support her please #racismitstopswithme#Indi

tory_maguire

RT @adamroy37: Just received a phone call from a young girl apologizing for her actions. Lets support her please #racismitstopswithme#Indi

Daniel Piotrowski

Australia. Where you die for your country and get a rest area named after you http://t.co/hO6LpfwDvI

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter